Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, March 2001, p. 1880-1882, Vol. 69, No. 3
Department of Veterinary Microbiology and
Parasitology1 and Department of
Epidemiology and Community Health,2 School of
Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana
70803
Received 26 June 2000/Returned for modification 30 August
2000/Accepted 7 December 2000
We challenged cats transfused with anti-Bartonella
serum and kittens born to antibody-positive queens with
Bartonella henselae to determine the contribution of
antibodies to the control of B. henselae in cats. In both
experiments, antibody-positive cats were protected from clinical
disease but passive antibody to the homologous strain of B. henselae did not prevent bacteremia.
Bartonella henselae is
the causative agent of human cat scratch disease, bacillary
angiomatosis, encephalopathy, and other clinical syndromes, the most
serious of which occur in immunocompromised individuals (reviewed in
reference 7). Cats are the natural host and become
bacteremic following infection (3, 10).
The immune mechanisms important in the control and prevention of
B. henselae infections have not been determined, and the relative contribution of antibodies in both the human and feline hosts
is unclear. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected individuals
lack a functional cellular immune system and do not mount a significant
antibody response to Bartonella infections (12), in contrast to the strong humoral response of human
(12, 18) and feline (4, 8, 15, 16, 19) hosts
that ultimately control the infection. Bacteremia in experimentally
infected cats decreases significantly as the level of antibody
increases (1, 7, 15) but both naturally and experimentally
infected cats can develop a recurrent bacteremia in the presence of
high levels of antibody (1, 3, 4), suggesting that
antibodies may be important in controlling only the initial bacteremia.
There are at least three genotypes of B. henselae, and these
types do not cross-protect; that is, cats infected with type 1 are
protected from bacteremia following challenge with type 1 but not other types (19). The effector mechanism responsible for this
protection has also not been determined.
The long generation time of B. henselae and the chronic
nature of the infection make it difficult to determine the relative contributions of cell-mediated and antibody-mediated effector mechanisms in the control of bacteremia. The purpose of this study was
to determine the role of antibody in controlling bacteremia in the
absence of a cellular immune response. In this study, we used B. henselae LSU16, a strain that causes reproducible disease in
intradermally (i.d.) inoculated cats (15). Following
inoculation with this strain, naive cats develop suppurative skin
lesions, fever, lethargy, anorexia, and lymphadenopathy, clinical signs similar to those of moderate to severe human cat scratch disease, in
addition to the bacteremia characteristic of the feline infection. We
were therefore able to examine the effect of antibody on clinical signs
as well.
All cats were purchased from either Harlan-Sprague-Dawley
(Indianapolis, Ind.) or Liberty Research, Inc. (Waverly, N.Y.). Six
10-month-old cats, culture negative for B. henselae and
seronegative by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and Western
blot analysis, were used as recipients; three of these cats were
transfused with sera from antibody-positive cats and three were
transfused with sera from antibody-negative cats. Six 2- to 5-year-old
cats were used as serum donors; three were inoculated 11 months
previously with B. henselae and were abacteremic at the time
of donation, and three were never exposed and were seronegative.
Blood was collected from donor cats for four consecutive weeks, and
sera were frozen at Cats that received anti-Bartonella sera i.v. had measurable
antibody levels to B. henselae 30 min following transfusion.
The anti-B. henselae titer following transfusion (400:1) was
eightfold lower than that of the pooled donor sera (3,200:1) and was
roughly equivalent to the expected dilution of the sera based on the
body weight of the recipient cats. The cat that received serum
subcutaneously did not have measurable antibody immediately following
transfusion but, 1 week postchallenge, had antibody levels
indistinguishable from those in the cats receiving i.v. transfusion. By
3 weeks postchallenge, measurable anti-Bartonella antibodies
were present in the sera of all three control cats while antibody
levels decreased for 2 weeks in cats that received anti-B.
henselae antisera and did not increase until week 7 (Fig.
1).
0019-9567/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/IAI.69.3.1880-1882.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Passive Antibody to Bartonella henselae Protects
against Clinical Disease following Homologous Challenge but Does
Not Prevent Bacteremia in Cats
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
![]()
TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
20°C. Prior to transfusion, the sera were
thawed, filtered through a 0.45-µm-pore-size filter, and cultured to
verify the absence of B. henselae. Recipient cats received
40 ml of pooled sera from either B. henselae-positive donors
(n = 3) or negative donors (n = 3).
Sera were transfused intravenously (i.v.) in five of the six cats; due
to transfusion difficulties, one anti-Bartonella-positive
cat received serum subcutaneously in several sites. All six transfusion
recipients were challenged with 3.6 × 107 CFU of B. henselae i.d. on the lateral thorax 30 min following transfusion.
Blood was collected for culture and antibody analysis immediately
before and after transfusion and weekly until the end of the study.
Bacterial cultures, western blot analysis and ELISA were performed as
previously described (8, 15).

View larger version (33K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 1.
Mean ELISA OD and standard deviation as a measure of
anti-B. henselae antibody levels (open circles, n = 3) and mean levels of bacteremia and standard deviation (closed
circles, n = 3) in control serum-transfused cats (A)
and anti-B. henselae serum-transfused cats (B).
By week 2 postchallenge, all three control cats had high levels of circulating B. henselae while one anti-Bartonella-positive (i.v.-transfused) cat was bacteremic (7.7 × 103 CFU/ml of blood). Despite the delay, the level of bacteremia between the two groups was indistinguishable by week 3 (Fig. 1).
The cats were monitored daily for signs of clinical disease, and skin
lesions were scored on a relative scale for diameter of swelling (0, no
change; 1, 0.1 to 0.5 cm; 2, 0.6 to 1.0 cm; 3, 1.1 to 1.5 cm; 4, greater than 1.5 cm), color (0, no change; 1, slightly pink; 2, pink;
3, red; 4, pink/purple), and the presence of pus (0, no pus; 1, pustule; 2, pus). The total skin lesion score was the sum of the scores
in the three categories. Cats that received anti-Bartonella
antisera did not develop significant clinical disease. While all six
cats developed some redness and swelling at the site of injection
within 2 days of challenge, the lesions were less severe and of shorter
duration in the anti-Bartonella-positive cats than in the
control cats (Fig. 2), and, in contrast
to the control cats, the anti-Bartonella-positive cats did
not developed pustules. Control cats developed fever (39.5 to
40.4°C), which peaked between days 4 and 12 postchallenge. In
contrast, one anti-Bartonella-positive cat (i.v. transfused)
developed a fever (40.2°C) on day 18 postchallenge, a timing
consistent with the loss of measurable passive antibody.
|
In a second experiment, we examined the role of natural passive antibody on the development of bacteremia and clinical disease. Four kittens from each of three queens were used. The first queen had been infected i.d. with 2.0 × 107 CFU of B. henselae at 12 weeks of age (chronically infected), the second queen was infected i.d. with 1.0 × 107 CFU of B. henselae at mid-gestation (acutely infected), and the final queen was maintained B. henselae free (control). All three queens were mated to B. henselae-negative toms. At 6 weeks of age, while still nursing, each kitten was challenged i.d. with 105 to 106 CFU of B. henselae. All 12 kittens had been culture negative since birth and were B. henselae culture negative at the time of challenge. The kittens were bled prior to challenge and at 2-week intervals for 6 weeks or until they were bacteremic. Rectal temperatures were taken daily, and the kittens were monitored for inflammation at the injection site.
Kittens born to infected queens had high but variable levels of
antibody at birth (ELISA optical density [OD], 0.69 to 2.10), which
fell steadily and were weakly positive at the time of challenge (ELISA
OD, 0.06 to 0.21). Kittens born to the control queen were negative for
antibodies to B. henselae at birth and at challenge (ELISA
OD, <0.05). Following challenge, the kittens born to the acutely
infected and chronically infected queens showed no measurable signs of
disease, while the kittens born to the control queen developed fever
(>39.5°C) and significant skin lesions, similar to those seen in the
adult cats. The clinical signs peaked in severity at 18 days
postchallenge (Fig. 3). At the
termination of the experiment, 7 weeks postchallenge, 11 of 12 kittens
were bacteremic; only 1 kitten, born to the acutely infected queen, failed to develop measurable bacteremia.
|
Together, these data suggest that even during homologous challenge, B. henselae can escape antibody-mediated effector mechanisms and cause bacteremia. The titer of antibody in transfused cats was eightfold lower than that of the pooled sera used in the transfusion (400:1 versus 3,200:1), a level approximately equivalent to that seen at 4 weeks postchallenge in the control cats (Fig. 1). It is possible that the level of antibody in the cats following transfusion was not sufficient to completely prevent bacteremia and that antibody levels approaching those in the donor cats may have prevented bacteremia. Yamomoto et al. (19) demonstrated that previous B. henselae exposure protected cats from bacteremia following challenge with a homologous strain. Our results suggest that antibody-mediated mechanisms may not be responsible for that protection, at least at the antibody levels present in our transfused cats and maternally protected kittens.
The inability of antibody to prevent bacteremia suggests a sequestered site of replication, either in blood cells or in some tissue that could seed the blood. Bartonella bacilliformis invades erythrocytes (2), and this has been suggested as an evasion mechanism for B. henselae. Intraerythrocytic bodies have been reported in naturally infected cats (11) and in feline erythrocytes infected in vitro (13). However, using immunohistochemistry, Guptill et al. (9) demonstrated the presence of extracellular bacteria in the blood and spleens of cats infected 8 weeks previously but were unable to demonstrate intracellular B. henselae in any of the tissues they examined including blood, although they saw psuedoinclusions in 5 to 6% of erythrocytes. Blood-associated cells, such as endothelial cells, could act as a site of replication and seeding of the blood. Dehio et al. (5, 6) demonstrated B. henselae invasion of human endothelial cells in vitro, although this has not been demonstrated in feline endothelial cells. Bartonella henselae is sensitive to killing by human complement via the alternate pathway, and the bactericidal effects are not increased by the addition of antibody (17). We have also observed this using feline complement (data not shown). One possible explanation consistent with our observations is that antibody accelerates the sequestering process, resulting in decreased complement activation and decreased inflammation. Clearly, additional work is required to address the bacterial and host mechanisms involved in the establishment and control of B. henselae bacteremia in the cat.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We acknowledge K. Ransom, J. Taylor, M. Mikolaczjyk, R. Tedford, and P. Triche for their technical support; the staff of the Division of Laboratory Medicine for their assistance with the cats; and P. Elzer, M. Groves, M. Philpott, and J. Storz for helpful discussions.
This study was supported in part by grant 1 R15 AI39720-01 from the National Institutes of Health.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Parasitology, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803. Phone: (225) 346-3307. Fax: (225) 346-5715. E-mail: oreilly{at}mail.vetmed.lsu.edu.
Editor: V. J. DiRita
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Abbott, R. C., B. B. Chomel, R. W. Kasten, K. A. Floyd-Hawkins, Y. Kikuchi, J. E. Koehler, and N. C. Pedersen. 1997. Experimental and natural infection with Bartonella henselae in domestic cats. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 20:41-51[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 2. |
Benson, L. A.,
G. McLaughlin, and G. M. Ihler.
1986.
Entry of Bartonella into erythrocytes.
Infect. Immun.
54:347-353 |
| 3. | Chomel, B. B., R. C. Abbott, R. W. Kasten, K. A. Floyd-Hawkins, P. H. Kass, C. A. Glaser, N. C. Pedersen, and J. E. Koehler. 1995. Bartonella henselae prevalence in domestic cats in California: risk factors and association between bacteremia and antibody titers. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:2445-2450[Abstract]. |
| 4. | Chomel, B. B., R. W. Kasten, K. Floyd-Hawkins, B. Chi, K. Yamamoto, J. Roberts-Wilson, A. N. Gurfield, R. C. Abbott, N. C. Pedersen, and J. E. Koehler. 1996. Experimental transmission of Bartonella henselae by the cat flea. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:1952-1956[Abstract]. |
| 5. | Dehio, C., M. Meyer, J. Berger, H. Schwarz, and C. Lanz. 1997. Interaction of Bartonella henselae with endothelial cells results in bacterial aggregation on the cell surface and the subsequent engulfment and internalization of bacterial aggregate by a unique structure, the invasome. J. Cell Sci. 110:2141-2154[Abstract]. |
| 6. | Dehio, C. 1999. Interactions of Bartonella henselae with vascular endothelial cells. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2:78-82[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 7. | Fournier, P.-E., and D. Raoult. 1998. Cat-scratch disease and an overview of other Bartonell henselae-related infections, p. 32-62. In A. Schmidt (ed.), Contributions to microbiology, vol. 1. Bartonella and Afipia species emphasizing Bartonella henselae. (ed. A. Schmidt). Karger, Basel. pp 32-62. |
| 8. |
Freeland, R. L.,
D. T. Scholl,
K. R. Rohde,
L. J. Shelton, and K. L. O'Reilly.
1999.
Identification of Bartonella-specific immunodominant antigens recognized by the feline humoral immune system.
Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol.
6:558-566 |
| 9. | Guptill, L., C.-C. Wu, L. Glickman, J. Turek, L. Slater, and H. HogenEsch. 2000. Extracellular Bartonella henselae and artifactual intraerythrocytic psuedoinclusions in experimentally infected cats. Vet. Microbiol. 76:283-290[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 10. |
Koehler, J. E.,
C. A. Glasser, and J. W. Tappero.
1994.
Rochalimaea henselae infection: a new zoonosis with the domestic cat as reservoir.
JAMA
271:531-535 |
| 11. | Kordick, D. L., and E. B. Breitschwerdt. 1995. Intraerythrocytic presence of Bartonella henselae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:1655-1666[Abstract]. |
| 12. | Maurin, M., R. Birtles, and D. Raoult. 1997. Current knowledge of Bartonella species. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 16:487-506[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 13. |
Mehock, J. R.,
C. E. Greene,
F. C. Gherardini,
T. Hahn, and D. C. Krause.
1998.
Bartonella henselae invasion of feline erythrocytes in vitro.
Infect. Immun.
66:3462-3466 |
| 14. | Kordick, D. L., and E. B. Breitschwerdt. 1997. Relapsing bacteremia after blood transmission of Bartonella henselae to cats. Am. J. Vet. Res. 58:492-497[Medline]. |
| 15. |
O'Reilly, K. L.,
R. B. Bauer,
R. L. Freeland,
L. D. Foil,
K. J. Hughes,
K. R. Rohde,
A. F. Roy,
R. Stout, and P. Triche.
1999.
Acute clinical disease in cats following infection with a pathogenic strain of Bartonella henselae (LSU-16).
Infect. Immun.
67:3066-3072 |
| 16. | Regnery, R. L., J. A. Rooney, A. M. Johnson, S. L. Nesby, P. Manzewitsch, K. Beaver, and J. F. Olson. 1996. Experimentally induced Bartonella henselae infections followed by challenge exposure and antimicrobial therapy in cats. Am. J. Vet. Res. 57:1714-1719[Medline]. |
| 17. | Rodriguez-Barradas, M. C., J. C. Bandres, R. J. Hamill, J. Trial, J. E. Clarridge, R. E. Baughn, and R. D. Rossen. 1995. In vitro evaluation of the role of humoral immunity against Bartonella henselae. Infect. Immun. 63:2367-2370[Abstract]. |
| 18. | Sander, A., M. Posselt, K. Oberle, and W. Bredt. 1998. Seroprevalence of antibodies to Bartonella henselae in patients with cat scratch disease and in healthy controls: evaluation and comparison of two commercial serological tests. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 4:486-490. |
| 19. | Yamamoto, K., B. B. Chomel, R. W. Kasten, C. C. Chang, T. Tseggai, P. R. Decker, M. Mackowiak, K. A. Floyd-Hawkins, and N. C. Pedersen. 1998. Homologous protection but lack of heterologous protection by various species and types of Bartonella in specific pathogen-free cats. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 65:191-204[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»