IAI FigSearch
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Young, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Spinola, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Young, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Spinola, S. M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Infection and Immunity, March 2001, p. 1938-1942, Vol. 69, No. 3
0019-9567/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/IAI.69.3.1938-1942.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Expression of Cytolethal Distending Toxin and Hemolysin Is Not Required for Pustule Formation by Haemophilus ducreyi in Human Volunteers

Royden S. Young,1 Kate R. Fortney,1 Valentina Gelfanova,1 Carrie L. Phillips,2 Barry P. Katz,1 Antoinette F. Hood,1,3 Jo L. Latimer,4 Robert S. Munson Jr.,5,6 Eric J. Hansen,4 and Stanley M. Spinola1,2,7,*

Departments of Medicine,1 Microbiology and Immunology,7 Pathology and Laboratory Medicine,2 and Dermatology,3 School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202; Children's Research Institute5 and Departments of Pediatrics and Microbiology,6 The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43205-2696; and Department of Microbiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75235-90484

Received 27 September 2000/Returned for modification 8 November 2000/Accepted 24 November 2000


    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

Haemophilus ducreyi makes cytolethal distending toxin (CDT) and hemolysin. In a previous human challenge trial, an isogenic hemolysin-deficient mutant caused pustules with a rate similar to that of its parent. To test whether CDT was required for pustule formation, six human subjects were inoculated with a CDT mutant and parent at multiple sites. The pustule formation rates were similar at both parent and mutant sites. A CDT and hemolysin double mutant was constructed and tested in five additional subjects. The pustule formation rates were similar for the parent and double mutant. These results indicate that neither the expression of CDT, nor that of hemolysin, nor both are required for pustule formation by H. ducreyi in humans.


    TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

Haemophilus ducreyi, the etiologic agent of the genital ulcer disease chancroid, makes at least two protein toxins: hemolysin and cytolethal distending toxin (CDT). Both toxins have potent cytotoxic functions in vitro, but their roles in human disease are unclear.

The H. ducreyi hemolysin is a member of a family of pore-forming toxins found in several bacterial genera, including Proteus, Serratia, and Edwardsiella (22, 24, 26, 31). The hemolysin is a 125-kDa protein encoded by two genes. hhdB encodes the secretion-activation protein (HhdB), while hhdA encodes the toxin HhdA (12, 23, 24, 26). The hemolysin is very labile, and its activity can only be detected in association with live bacterial cells (2, 22-24). We recently reported the characterization of an isogenic hemolysin-deficient mutant (35000HP-RSM1) in which hhdB is insertionally inactivated by the Omega Km-2 cassette (22). In vitro, the parent had cytopathic effect for human foreskin fibroblasts and keratinocytes whereas the mutant lacked cytotoxicity (22). Despite the dramatic activity of the hemolysin in vitro, inoculation of the isogenic hemolysin-deficient mutant caused pustules at a rate similar to that of its parent in human volunteers (26). Similarly, an hhdA deletion mutant caused ulcers as frequently as its parent in the temperature-dependent rabbit model (12).

H. ducreyi CDT is a soluble protein encoded by a gene cluster designated cdtABC (16, 30). CDT is also produced by several other gram-negative organisms, such as Escherichia coli, Shigella spp., and Campylobacter spp. and causes irreversible G2 arrest and subsequent cell death of epithelial cells and apoptosis of T cells (11, 16, 30). CDT is secreted, and its activity can be detected in frozen cell culture supernatants after 1 month (10, 27). In vitro, CDT has cytopathic effect for fibroblasts, keratinocytes, and HeLa cells, and expression of all three gene products is essential for cytotoxic activity in cell culture supernatants (11, 27, 30). CdtB shares significant homology with type I mammalian DNases and has intrinsic DNase activity that may explain its role in eukaryotic cell cycle arrest (13). We recently constructed a mutant (35000.303) in the structural gene encoding one component of CDT, designated cdtC (30). In contrast to the parent, cell culture supernatants obtained from 35000.303 or whole cells of 35000.303 lack cytopathic effect on keratinocytes, fibroblasts, and HeLa cells and do not cause apoptosis of T cells (16, 30). However, the cdtC mutant was as virulent as the parent in the temperature-dependent rabbit model (30).

Here we tested the hypothesis that expression of CDT is required for the virulence of H. ducreyi in humans. The virulence of the isogenic CDT-deficient mutant (35000.303) and its parent was first tested in a double-blinded, escalating dose-response study. Since 35000.303 could still produce intact hemolysin, we also compared a CDT and hemolysin double mutant (35000.304) and its parent in a second trial. We compared the papule and pustule formation rates, the cellular infiltrate, and recovery of bacteria from lesions inoculated with the mutant and the parent in each trial.

Construction and characterization of a cdtC and hhdB double mutant. H. ducreyi 35000 is a wild-type strain (30). H. ducreyi 35000.303, an isogenic CDT-deficient mutant that contains a chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (cat) cassette insertion in cdtC, was described previously (30). The plasmid pKLP107 contains an Omega Km-2 cassette inserted in hhdB (22). The plasmid pRSM1791 utilizes lacZ as a counterselectable marker to facilitate allele exchange (9). The interrupted hemolysin gene fragment from pKLP107 was ligated into pRSM1791, and the resulting plasmid, pRSM1920 (9) was electroporated into 35000.303. Colonies were selected on chloramphenicol- and kanamycin-containing plates, and cointegrates were resolved in the presence of X-Gal (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-beta -D-galactopyranoside) as previously described (9). A CDT and hemolysin double mutant was recovered and designated 35000.304.

Lipooligosaccharide (LOS) and outer membrane proteins (OMPs) were prepared from 35000, 35000.303 and 35000.304 as described previously (26, 33). OMPs were subjected to analysis by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in 12.5% acrylamide gels as described previously (26, 33). LOS was analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in 14% acrylamide gels and silver staining as previously described (33). To examine the double mutant for CDT activity, a Jurkat T-cell proliferation assay was performed exactly as described previously (16). Hemolytic activity was measured in a liquid-suspension hemolysis assay, as described elsewhere (23, 26).

Human inoculation experiments. Healthy adult male and female volunteers over 18 years of age were recruited for the study. Informed consent was obtained from the subjects for participation and for human immunodeficiency virus serology, in accordance with the human experimentation guidelines of the Institutional Review Board of Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The experimental challenge protocol, preparation and inoculation of the bacteria, determination of estimated delivered dose (EDD), and clinical observations were done as described previously (5, 26, 28, 29).

A modification of an escalating dose-response study was used to compare the virulence of 35000 and 35000.303 and that of 35000 and 35000.304 exactly as described previously (3, 6, 26). Briefly, each subject was infected at six sites. On one arm, three sites were inoculated with twofold serial dilutions of the mutant. On the other arm, two sites were inoculated with the parent, and one site was inoculated with the highest dose of the heat-killed mutant. To blind the study, the six suspensions containing bacteria were randomized, given a code number, and inoculated at identical sites on each subject in each iteration. The clinicians who evaluated the subjects were unaware of the identity of the suspensions. Subjects were observed until they reached a clinical endpoint, defined as either 14 days after inoculation, development of a painful pustule, or resolution of infection at all sites. When a clinical endpoint was achieved, the code was broken and up to two sites with active disease (one inoculated with the parent and one with the mutant), if present, were biopsied with a punch forceps. The subjects were then treated with antibiotics as described previously.

Each biopsy specimen was cut into portions. One portion was semiquantitatively cultured as described previously (28, 29). One portion was formalin fixed and used for immunohistological studies as previously described (25, 28, 29). The slides were coded and read by a dermatopathologist, who was unaware of the code.

Individual colonies from the inocula, surface cultures, and biopsy specimens were picked, suspended in freezing medium, and frozen in 96-well plates. All colonies were scored for susceptibility to chloramphenicol or chloramphenicol and kanamycin on agar plates.

Evaluation of cdtC mutant in human subjects. We previously reported construction of a mutant (35000.3) that contains a cat insertion in cdtC (30). Five men and two women (one black and six white; age range, 20 to 47 years, age [mean ± standard deviation], 35.3 ± 10.2 years) enrolled in the study. One male subject withdrew prior to inoculation. Three subjects (121, 125, and 126) were challenged in the first iteration, and three subjects (127, 128, and 129) were challenged in the second iteration (Table 1).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1.   CDT mutant trial responses to inoculation of live H. ducreyi strainsa

The EDD in the first iteration was 40 CFU for 35000 and 16, 32, and 64 CFU for 35000.303. Papules developed at six of six sites inoculated with the parent and at seven of nine sites inoculated with the mutant. At endpoint, pustules were present at five of six parent sites and four of nine mutant sites.

Since inoculation of both the mutant and the parent caused pustules at similar rates, we continued the experiment with similar target doses. In the second iteration, three subjects were inoculated with an EDD of 50 CFU of 35000 and 30, 60, and 120 CFU of 35000.303. Papules developed at six of six sites inoculated with the parent, and at eight of nine sites inoculated with the mutant. At endpoint, three of six parent sites and five of nine mutant sites contained pustules.

For this trial, no lesions developed at sites inoculated with the heat-killed controls. The pustule formation rates were 66.7% (exact binomial 95% confidence interval [CI], 34.9 to 90.1%) at 12 sites for 35000 and 50% (exact binomial 95% CI, 26 to 74%) at 18 sites for 35000.303 (one-tailed Fisher's exact test; P = 0.301). Thus, expression of CDT was not required for pustule formation.

Characterization of the CDT and hemolysin double mutant. In a previous human challenge trial, an isogenic hemolysin-deficient mutant caused pustules at a rate similar to that of its parent (26). We constructed a CDT and hemolysin double mutant (35000.304) in order to exclude the possibilities that the single mutants were virulent because they expressed the other toxin.

In a Southern blot assay, genomic DNA from 35000 and 35000.304 were digested with PstI and probed with the hhdB and cdtC open reading frames as well as the Omega Km-2 and cat cassettes. The hhdB probe bound to a 4.3-kb DNA fragment in the parent and a 6.1-kb DNA fragment in the double mutant. The cdtC probe bound to a 4.1-kb DNA fragment in the parent and a 5.5-kb DNA fragment in the double mutant. The Omega Km-2 and cat probes did not bind to 35000 DNA but did bind to 6.1- and 5.5-kb DNA fragments in 35000.304, respectively (data not shown).

35000 and 35000.304 had similar growth rates in broth (data not shown). OMPs and LOS prepared from 35000.304 and 35000 were analyzed by SDS-PAGE. Both isolates had similar LOS patterns (data not shown) and OMP profiles (data not shown).

The double mutant was evaluated for loss of CDT and hemolysin activity. Jurkat T-cell proliferation was not inhibited by 35000.304 but was inhibited by 35000 as described previously (data not shown) (30). As expected, broth-grown 35000 had activity while 35000.304 lacked activity in a liquid-suspension hemolysis assay (data not shown).

Evaluation of the CDT and hemolysin double mutant in human subjects. Four men and four women (one black and seven white; age range, 21 to 38 years; age [mean ± standard deviation], 28.3 ± 7.3 years) enrolled in the study. Three subjects (148, 150, and 153) were challenged in the first iteration, and two subjects (137 and 157) were challenged in the second iteration (Table 2). Two subjects (151 and 156) withdrew on the day of inoculation. Another subject (178) was excluded because he took azithromycin just prior to enrollment in the study.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 2.   CDT-Hemolysin double mutant trial responses to inoculation of live H. ducreyi strainsa

The EDD in the first iteration was 44 CFU for 35000 and 19, 37, and 74 CFU for 35000.304. Papules developed at six of six parent sites and nine of nine mutant sites (Table 2). Papules resolved at two of six parent sites and five of nine mutant sites. At endpoint, four of six parent sites and four of nine mutant sites contained pustules.

In the second iteration, two subjects were inoculated with an EDD of 64 CFU of 35000 and 25, 50, and 100 CFU of 35000.304. Papules developed at two of four parent sites and five of six mutant sites (Table 2). Papules resolved at one of four parent sites and four of nine mutant sites. At endpoint, pustules were present at one of four parent sites and one of six mutant sites.

For this trial, three papules developed at five sites inoculated with the heat-killed control and resolved in 2 to 4 days. For sites inoculated with live bacteria, the pustule formation rates were 50% (exact binomial 95% CI, 18.7 to 81.3%) at 10 sites for 35000 and 33.3% (exact binomial 95% CI, 11.8 to 61.6%) at 15 sites for 35000.304 (one-tailed Fisher's exact test; P = 0.34). Thus, expression of neither CDT nor hemolysin was required for pustule formation.

Surface cultures were obtained from all inoculation sites at each follow-up visit. No bacteria were recovered from sites inoculated with the heat-killed control. In trial 1, H. ducreyi was recovered intermittently from parent and mutant sites in four of six subjects. The recovery rate was 4% from sites inoculated with the parent (n = 73) and 5% from sites inoculated with the mutant (n = 74). In trial 2, bacteria were isolated from one of five subjects, and the recovery rate was 5% from the parent (n = 39) and 2% from the mutant (n = 49) sites. In both trials, the surface culture recovery rates of bacteria from mutant and parent sites were not statistically different. All biopsy specimens were semiquantitatively cultured. In the first trial, bacteria were recovered from five of six parent sites and five of five mutant sites. The yield for 35000 and 35000.303 from positive cultures ranged from 2.1 × 104 to 1.1 × 106 CFU/g of tissue and 1.7 × 103 to 3.0 × 105 CFU/g of tissue, respectively. In the second trial, bacteria were recovered from all three parent and all three mutant sites biopsied. The yield for 35000 and 35000.304 ranged from 1.8 × 104 to 8 × 105 CFU/g of tissue and 1.0 × 103 to 2.6 × 105 CFU/g of tissue, respectively. In both trials, the numbers of bacteria recovered from mutant and parent biopsy specimens were similar.

We examined the cellular infiltrate in nine parent and eight mutant sites that were present at endpoint. In biopsy specimens obtained from both the parent and mutant sites, micropustules with polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) were present in the epidermis. The dermis contained a perivascular infiltrate of mononuclear cells and some PMNs, and the venules were lined with reactive endothelial cells. In both the parent and the mutant specimens, the majority of the mononuclear cells were stained with a CD3 marker (data not shown).

To confirm that the inocula were correct and that we had inoculated the sites as intended, individual colonies were analyzed for antibiotic susceptibility as described previously (33). If available, 30 colonies per specimen were analyzed so that there was a high likelihood (89%) that the cultures were pure (33). For the two cultures used to prepare the inocula in the CDT mutant trial, all 78 parent colonies and 80 mutant colonies tested were phenotypically correct. Positive surface cultures were obtained from four subjects in this trial, and all 39 parent and all 46 mutant colonies tested from their respective sites were phenotypically correct. Of five parent site biopsy specimens and five mutant site biopsy specimens that were culture positive, all 185 parent colonies and 161 mutant colonies tested were phenotypically correct.

For the inocula in the CDT and hemolysin double mutant trial, all 96 parent colonies and 95 mutant colonies tested were phenotypically correct. Positive surface cultures were obtained only from one subject, and both parent colonies and 30 mutant colonies tested were phenotypically correct. Of three parent biopsy specimens and three mutant biopsy specimens that were culture positive, all 144 parent colonies and 100 mutant colonies tested were phenotypically correct. Thus, all colonies tested had the expected antibiotic susceptibility.

Conclusions. Both hemolysin and CDT have potent in vitro cytopathic effect for human cell cultures and are postulated to be major virulence determinants for chancroid. In a previous study, an isogenic hemolysin mutant caused pustules at a rate similar to that caused by its parent (26). In this study, we constructed a CDT-deficient mutant (35000.303) and compared it with its parent (35000) in the human challenge model. Despite its lack of cytopathic activity in vitro, inoculation of 35000.303 caused papules and pustules at similar rates to those of its parent. A CDT and hemolysin double mutant (35000.304) was also constructed and caused papules and pustules at rates similar to its parent. Thus, expression of either CDT, hemolysin, or both is not required for pustule formation in humans.

For subject safety and practical considerations, we inoculate volunteers on their upper arms and allow the infection to proceed only until they develop painful pustules or for 14 days. Thus, a major limitation of the human model is that we cannot study disease beyond the pustular stage, at stages such as ulcers or lymphadenitis. Therefore, we cannot exclude the possibility that CDT or hemolysin contributes to pathogenesis beyond the pustular stage. Nevertheless, isogenic hemoglobin receptor (HgbA)-deficient, peptidoglycan-associated lipoprotein-deficient, and DsrA-deficient mutants are unable to form pustules even at doses 10-fold that of the parent in the model (2, 8a, 14). Thus, the model can be used to examine whether a putative virulence determinant has a role in pustule formation.

An explanation for the disparity between the in vitro experiments using cell monolayers and the human challenge experiments may be the differences in bacterial doses used in the respective models. For example, 105 to 107 CFU of bacteria were allowed to interact with 105 eukaryotic cells to study hemolysin activity (22). In the human model, subjects are inoculated with EDDs that range from 1 to 100 CFU. Thus, the in vitro models employ pharmacological doses of the organism relative to the physiological doses that cause infection.

Supernatants and whole cells of 35000 cause apoptosis of T cells, while preparations made from 35000.303 (16) and 35000.304 do not. We examined eight paired biopsy specimens of mutant and parent sites from both the CDT and CDT-hemolysin trial by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) (In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit, Fluorescein; Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Mannheim, Germany). Few (<3%) of the lymphocytic nuclei stained with TUNEL in all of the biopsies (data not shown). TUNEL stains all cells with nicked DNA (15), and in some specimens it was difficult to distinguish necrotic cells from apoptotic bodies, especially in the pustule. In vivo, macrophages clear apoptotic bodies rapidly (15), and clearance may obscure differences between the mutants and parent in their ability to induce programmed cell death. Although we found no gross difference in the ability of the mutants and parent to cause apoptosis in vivo, these results should be interpreted with caution.

In these trials, isolates that did not make CDT and/or hemolysin elicited an inflammatory infiltrate that was similar to that elicited by the parent. The histopathology of natural and experimental infection consists of two major components: a PMN infiltrate that coalesces at the ulcer or pustule base and a dermal mononuclear infiltrate that has features of a delayed-type hypersensitivity or a homing response (1, 18-20, 25, 28). Confocal microscopy indicates that H. ducreyi colocalizes with PMNs and macrophages throughout experimental infection, but the organism remains extracellular and evades phagocytosis (7; unpublished observations). The PMN, macrophage, and T-cell responses apparently do not always clear the organism, and the elicited host response may damage the skin. In a previous study, we hypothesized that CDT interfered with T-cell responses to H. ducreyi by induction of apoptosis (7). Similarly, hemolysin causes lysis of T cells, B cells, and macrophages in vitro and may down regulate host responses (16, 32). If the immune response primarily damages the skin, the inability of these mutants to interfere with the host response might not affect lesion formation or pathology.

In summary, neither hemolysin, CDT, nor both are required for pustule formation in human subjects. Although we cannot exclude the possibility that these toxins contribute to ulcer formation, chancroid may not be a toxin-mediated disease. The organism elicits and apparently evades a vigorous host response, which may damage the skin. Limited data from natural and experimental infection also suggest that infection with H. ducreyi does not reliably confer protective immunity (4, 8, 17, 21). Thus, future studies should focus on examining immunopathogenesis as a likely cause for lesion formation.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by grants AI27863 and AI31494 (to S.M.S.), AI32011 (to E.J.H.), and AI34967 (to R.S.M.) from the National Institutes of Health. The human challenge trials were supported by the Sexually Transmitted Diseases Clinical Trials Unit through contract NO1-AI75329 from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and by National Institutes of Health grant MO1RR00750 to the General Clinical Research Center at Indiana University.


    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Medicine, 435 Emerson Hall, 545 Barnhill Dr., Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN 46202-5124. Phone: (317) 274-1427. Fax: (317) 274-1587. E-mail: sspinola{at}iupui.edu.

Editor:   J. T. Barbieri


    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Text
References

1. Abeck, D., A. L. Freinkel, H. C. Korting, R. M. Szeimis, and R. C. Ballard. 1997. Immunohistochemical investigations of genital ulcers caused by Haemophilus ducreyi. Int. J. Sex. Transm. Dis. AIDS 8:585-588.
2. Alfa, M. J., P. Degagne, and P. A. Totten. 1996. Haemophilus ducreyi hemolysin acts as a contact cytotoxin and damages human foreskin fibroblasts in cell culture. Infect. Immun. 64:2349-2352[Abstract].
3. Al-Tawfiq, J. A., J. Harezlak, B. P. Katz, and S. M. Spinola. 2000. Cumulative experience with Haemophilus ducreyi in the human model of experimental infection. Sex. Transm. Dis. 27:111-114[Medline].
4. Al-Tawfiq, J. A., K. L. Palmer, C.-Y. Chen, J. C. Haley, B. P. Katz, A. F. Hood, and S. M. Spinola. 1999. Experimental infection of human volunteers with Haemophilus ducreyi does not confer protection against subsequent challenge. J. Infect. Dis. 179:1283-1287[CrossRef][Medline].
5. Al-Tawfiq, J. A., A. C. Thornton, B. P. Katz, K. R. Fortney, K. D. Todd, A. F. Hood, and S. M. Spinola. 1998. Standardization of the experimental model of Haemophilus ducreyi infection in human subjects. J. Infect. Dis. 178:1684-1687[CrossRef][Medline].
6. Al-Tawfiq, J. A., K. R. Fortney, B. P. Katz, C. Elkins, and S. M. Spinola. 2000. An isogenic hemoglobin receptor-deficient mutant of Haemophilus ducreyi is attenuated in the human model of experimental infection. J. Infect. Dis. 181:1049-1054[CrossRef][Medline].
7. Bauer, M. E., and S. M. Spinola. 2000. Localization of Haemophilus ducreyi at the pustular stage of disease in the human model of infection. Infect. Immun. 68:2309-2314[Abstract/Free Full Text].
8. Blackmore, C. A., K. Limpakarnjanarat, J. G. Rigau-Perez, W. L. Albritton, and J. R. Greenwood. 1985. An outbreak of chancroid in Orange County, California: descriptive epidemiology and disease-control measures. J. Infect. Dis. 151:840-844[Medline].
8a. Bong, C. T. H., R. E. Throm, K. R. Fortney, B. P. Katz, A. F. Hood, C. Elkins, and S. M. Spinola. 2001. DsrA-deficient mutant of Haemophilus ducreyi is impaired in its ability to infect human volunteers. Infect. Immun. 69:1488-1491[Abstract/Free Full Text].
9. Bozue, J. A., L. Tarantino, and R. S. Munson, Jr. 1998. Facile construction of mutations in Haemophilus ducreyi using lacz as a counter-selectable marker. FEMS Microbiol. Let to 164:269-273[CrossRef][Medline].
10. Cope, L. D., S. Lumbley, J. L. Latimer, J. Klesney-Tait, M. K. Stevens, L. S. Johnson, M. Purven, R. S. Munson, Jr., T. Lagergard, J. D. Radolf, and E. J. Hansen. 1997. A diffusible cytotoxin of Haemophilus ducreyi. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:4056-4061[Abstract/Free Full Text].
11. Cortes-Bratti, X., E. Chaves-Olarte, T. Lagergard, and M. Thelestam. 1999. The cytolethal distending toxin from the chancroid bacterium Haemophilus ducreyi induces cell-cycle arrest in the G2 phase. J. Clin. Investig. 103:107-115[Medline].
12. Dutro, S. M., G. E. Wood, and P. A. Totten. 1999. Prevalence of, antibody response to, and immunity induced by Haemophilus ducreyi hemolysin. Infect. Immun. 67:3317-3328[Abstract/Free Full Text].
13. Elwell, C. A., and L. A. Dreyfus. 2000. DNase I homologous residues in CdtB are critical for cytolethal distending toxin-mediated cell cycle arrest. Mol. Microbiol. 37:952-963[CrossRef][Medline].
14. Fortney, K. R., R. S. Young, M. E. Bauer, B. P. Katz, A. F. Hood, R. S. Munson, Jr., and S. M. Spinola. 2000. Expression of peptidoglycan-associated lipoprotein is required for virulence in the human model of Haemophilus ducreyi infection. Infect. Immun. 68:6441-6448[Abstract/Free Full Text].
15. Gavrieli, Y., Y. Sherman, and S. A. Ben-Sasson. 1992. Identification of programmed cell death in situ via specific labeling of nuclear DNA fragmentation. J. Cell. Biol. 119:493-501[Abstract/Free Full Text].
16. Gelfanova, V., E. J. Hansen, and S. M. Spinola. 1999. Cytolethal distending toxin of Haemophilus ducreyi induces apoptotic death of Jurkat T cells. Infect. Immun. 67:6394-6402[Abstract/Free Full Text].
17. Hammond, G. W., M. Slutchuk, J. Scatliff, E. Sherman, J. C. Wilt, and A. R. Ronald. 1980. Epidemiologic, clinical, laboaratory, and therapeutic features of an urban outbreak of chancroid in North America. Rev. Infect. Dis. 2:867-879[Medline].
18. King, R., S. H. Choudhri, J. Nasio, J. Gough, N. J. D. Nagelkerke, F. A. Plummer, J. O. Ndinya-Achola, and A. R. Ronald. 1998. Clinical and in situ cellular responses to Haemophilus ducreyi in the presence or absence of HIV infection. Int. J. Sex. Transm. Dis. AIDS 9:531-536.
19. King, R., A. Gough, J. Nasio, F. Ndinya-Achola, F. Plummer, and J. Wilkins. 1996. An immunohistochemical analysis of naturally occurring chancroid. J. Infect. Dis. 174:427-430[Medline].
20. Magro, C. M., A. N. Crowson, M. Alfa, A. Nath, A. Ronald, J. O. Ndinya-Achola, and J. Nasio. 1996. A morphological study of penile chancroid lesions in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive and -negative African men with a hypothesis concerning the role of chancroid in HIV transmission. Hum. Pathol. 27:1066-1070[CrossRef][Medline].
21. Morse, S. A. 1989. Chancroid and Haemophilus ducreyi. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2:137-157[Abstract/Free Full Text].
22. Palmer, K. L., W. E. Goldman, and R. S. Munson, Jr. 1996. An isogenic hemolysin-deficient mutant of Haemophilus ducreyi lacks the ability to produce cytopathic effects on human foreskin fibroblasts. Mol. Microbiol. 21:13-19[CrossRef][Medline].
23. Palmer, K. L., S. Grass, and R. S. Munson, Jr. 1994. Identification of a hemolytic activity elaborated by Haemophilus ducreyi. Infect. Immun. 62:3041-3043[Abstract/Free Full Text].
24. Palmer, K. L., and R. S. Munson, Jr. 1995. Cloning and characterization of the genes encoding the haemolysin of Haemophilus ducreyi. Mol. Microbiol. 18:821-830[CrossRef][Medline].
25. Palmer, K. L., C. T. Schnizlein-Bick, A. Orazi, K. John, C.-Y. Chen, A. F. Hood, and S. M. Spinola. 1998. The immune response to Haemophilus ducreyi resembles a delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction throughout experimental infection of human subjects. J. Infect. Dis. 178:1688-1697[CrossRef][Medline].
26. Palmer, K. L., A. C. Thornton, K. R. Fortney, A. F. Hood, R. S. Munson, Jr., and S. M. Spinola. 1998. Evaluation of an isogenic hemolysin-deficient mutant in the human model of Haemophilus ducreyi infection. J. Infect. Dis. 178:191-199[Medline].
27. Purven, M., A. Frisk, I. Lonnroth, and T. Lagergard. 1997. Purification and identification of Haemophilus ducreyi cytotoxin by use of a neutralizing monoclonal antibody. Infect. Immun. 65:3496-3499[Abstract].
28. Spinola, S. M., A. Orazi, J. N. Arno, K. Fortney, P. Kotylo, C.-Y. Chen, A. A. Campagnari, and A. F. Hood. 1996. Haemophilus ducreyi elicits a cutaneous infiltrate of CD4 cells during experimental human infection. J. Infect. Dis. 173:394-402[Medline].
29. Spinola, S. M., L. M. Wild, M. A. Apicella, A. A. Gaspari, and A. A. Campagnari. 1994. Experimental human infection with Haemophilus ducreyi. J. Infect. Dis. 169:1146-1150[Medline].
30. Stevens, M. K., J. L. Latimer, S. R. Lumbley, C. K. Ward, L. D. Cope, T. Lagergard, and E. J. Hansen. 1999. Characterization of a Haemophilus ducreyi mutant deficient in expression of cytolethal distending toxin. Infect. Immun. 67:3900-3908[Abstract/Free Full Text].
31. Totten, P. A., D. V. Norn, and W. E. Stamm. 1995. Characterization of the hemolytic activity of Haemophilus ducreyi. Infect. Immun. 63:4409-4416[Abstract].
32. Wood, G. E., S. M. Dutro, and P. A. Totten. 1999. Target cell range of Haemophilus ducreyi hemolysin and its involvement in invasion of human epithelial cells. Infect. Immun. 67:3740-3749[Abstract/Free Full Text].
33. Young, R. S., K. Fortney, J. C. Haley, A. F. Hood, A. A. Campagnari, J. Wang, J. A. Bozue, R. S. Munson, Jr., and S. M. Spinola. 1999. Expression of sialylated or paragloboside-like lipooligosaccharides are not required for pustule formation by Haemophilus ducreyi in human volunteers. Infect. Immun. 67:6335-6340[Abstract/Free Full Text].

Infection and Immunity, March 2001, p. 1938-1942, Vol. 69, No. 3
0019-9567/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/IAI.69.3.1938-1942.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.


This article has been cited by other articles:


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Young, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Spinola, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Young, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Spinola, S. M.

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. J. Virol. Eukaryot. Cell
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. All ASM Journals