Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, March 2001, p. 1947-1952, Vol. 69, No. 3
Department of Epidemiology and Preventive
Medicine,1 Department of Microbiology
and Immunology,3 and Center for Vaccine
Development,4 University of Maryland School of
Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, and Department of
Microbiology, University of Sydney, Australia2
Received 20 June 2000/Returned for modification 31 August
2000/Accepted 6 December 2000
Epidemic Vibrio cholerae strains possess a large
cluster of essential virulence genes on the chromosome called the
Vibrio pathogenicity island (VPI). The VPI contains the
tcp gene cluster encoding the type IV pilus
toxin-coregulated pilus colonization factor which can act as the
cholera toxin bacteriophage (CTX Pandemic cholera is traditionally
caused by specific strains of Vibrio cholerae O1 (23,
41) which are divided into two biotypes with classical biotype
strains representing remnants of the sixth-pandemic clone, while El Tor
biotype strains represent the current seventh-pandemic clone. The exact
genetic relationship between these strains, however, is not well
understood nor have the reasons why the seventh-pandemic clone replaced
the sixth-pandemic clone been determined. Classical and El Tor strains
were originally distinguished on the basis of their differences in
several biochemical properties, including the ability to hemolyze sheep
red blood cells, the susceptibility to polymyxin B, and the
Voges-Proskauer reaction. Interestingly, as the seventh-pandemic has
progressed, an increasing number of strains have been isolated which,
like classical biotype strains, are hemolysin negative (1, 7, 44,
45). The biotypes also differ in the expression of several important virulence factors such as the coordinately regulated cholera
toxin and toxin-coregulated pilus (TCP); however, until recently, the
genetics underlying these differences were not well understood
(5, 13, 20-22, 36, 46, 47). It has recently been shown
that an explanation as to the differences in virulence factor
expression are associated with variation in the tcpPH
promoter region (29). Because it could be argued that
seventh-pandemic strains are losing several phenotypes and developing
classical biotype characteristics and because essential El Tor
characteristics are found in many nonpathogenic environmental strains,
we refer here to the isolates as being of the sixth- or the
seventh-pandemic.
Epidemic V. cholerae strains possess two gene clusters that
provide a normally marine or estuarine bacterium with the ability to
colonize the human intestine and secrete a potent toxin, resulting in
severe diarrhea (24, 35, 47, 49). These virulence gene clusters are absent from nonpathogenic strains. The genes encoding cholera toxin together with the adjacent genes on the CTX element are
carried on the genome of a filamentous bacteriophage (CTX There has long been an interest in the relationship of the sixth- and
seventh-pandemic strains. The characteristics of the El Tor biotype are
essentially those of most environmental nonpathogenic strains, while
those of the classical biotype differ by the absence (loss) of
functions with regard to hemolysin production, Voges-Proskauer reaction, and hemagglutination (1, 7-10, 45). Multilocus enzyme electrophoresis (MLEE) indicates that the strains responsible for the two pandemics are related, but the first presumed housekeeping gene (asd) to be sequenced from both pandemic strains
differed at 1.6% of bases, suggesting a long period of divergence.
This led us to the hypothesis that the two pandemic strains were
independently derived from different environmental strains
(25). However, further study (3) showed that
three genes (mdh, dnaE, and 1,038 bp of
hlyA sequenced) are identical in the sixth- and
seventh-pandemic strains, apart from the known 11-bp deletion in
hlyA of sixth-pandemic strains, which makes them hemolysin
negative. Furthermore, in addition to asd with 1.6% base
differences, recA differed at 4.59% of bases. Thus, the
five genes fall into two classes: those identical or nearly so and
those which are in the normal range for divergence of distantly related
strains of a species. We interpreted the presence of three genes with
no evidence of any sequence differences due to random genetic drift to
mean that the two pandemic strains were closely related, as previously
indicated by MLEE, but not directly derived from each other. The other
two genes differ by 1.6% (asd) and 4.59%
(recA), with every indication that the differences are due
to random genetic drift of neutral mutations. It is highly improbable
that this level of variation could have accumulated over a time in
which no base substitution occurred in the other genes, and we
concluded that for both asd and recA they had
undergone whole-gene substitution by recombination.
In pursuit of our interest in the factors and processes involved in the
emergence, pathogenesis, persistence, and spread of epidemic V. cholerae, we have fully sequenced and compared the entire VPI loci
from representative strains from the sixth- and seventh-pandemics.
Although several previous studies have reported the sequence of
specific regions of the VPI from sixth- or seventh-pandemic strains
(18, 19, 24, 27, 39, 40), a complete VPI analysis and
comparison has not been performed to date. Where genes have been
sequenced from both pandemics, the level of difference ranged from 0%
(e.g., aldA) to 22% for tcpA. It seems clear
that different parts of the VPI have different histories and in order
to study this a complete sequence from at least one strain of each
pandemic is needed. We report here the differences in VPI sequence,
size, and gene structure between the two pandemic clones.
Sequencing the VPI from representative strains.
DNA sequence
from positions 1 to 12,765 (numbering starts after the left
att site) of N16961 was reported previously by us (24) and not resequenced. DNA from positions 1 to 11196 of
strain 395 was sequenced by random shotgun analysis of cosmid DNA as described previously (24). The remainder of each VPI was
sequenced by directional PCR sequencing using overlapping primers as
enough of the VPI had been previously sequenced in either a sixth- or a
seventh-pandemic strain or both. Primers were designed to amplify overlapping segments 1 kb in length. We first sequenced the regions not
previously sequenced for that pandemic clone but, since the pattern of
differences between the two pandemics suggested that some could be due
to sequencing errors, we also resequenced those regions previously done
by other laboratories, specifically the tcp regions of both
sixth and seventh pandemic strains reported by Ogierman et al.
(39) (GenBank accession numbers X74730 and X604098) and
the acf region reported by Kovach et al. (27) (GenBank accession number U39068). Sequences were edited using either
SEQUENCHER software version 3.0 (Genecodes, Ann Arbor, Mich.) or
PHRED-PHRAP-CONSED programs (http://bozeman.mbt.washington.edu) (11). Regions previously sequenced were included as
reference for comparative editing. Any difference between our sequence
and the published sequence was checked in the sequence chromatogram. The sequence differences between sixth- and seventh-pandemic
strains were inspected base-by-base by using the CONSED
custom navigation facility. Sequence comparisons were done using
Multicomp (42). ORF analysis and database searches
were done using the ORF finder and BLAST search facilities of the
National Center for Biotechnology Information
(http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). The substitution rate was calculated
by using a program provided by Li (33).
0019-9567/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/IAI.69.3.1947-1952.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Comparison of Vibrio cholerae
Pathogenicity Islands in Sixth and Seventh Pandemic Strains
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
) receptor. The VPI also contains
genes that regulate virulence factor expression. We have fully
sequenced and compared the VPI of the seventh-pandemic (El Tor biotype)
strain N16961 and the sixth-pandemic (classical biotype) strain 395 and
found that the N16961 VPI is 41,272 bp and encodes 29 predicted
proteins, whereas the 395 VPI is 41,290 bp. In addition to various
nucleotide and amino acid polymorphisms, there were several proteins
whose predicted size differed greatly between the strains as a result
of frameshift mutations. We hypothesize that these VPI sequence
differences provide preliminary evidence to help explain the
differences in virulence factor expression between epidemic strains
(i.e., the biotypes) of V. cholerae.
![]()
TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
) (49). The Vibrio pathogenicity island (VPI) is
one of the initial genetic factors required for the emergence of
epidemic V. cholerae. It contains several gene clusters,
including the tcp gene cluster which encodes the type IV
pilus structure known as TCP that is an essential colonization factor
(16, 47) and acts as the CTX
receptor
(49). We recently found evidence that the VPI appears to
be phage encoded and can also form a plasmid replicative form
(24, 26). The VPI also contains genes that encode proteins that regulate virulence (4-6, 14), and it contains
numerous open reading frames (ORFs) with no known function.
General comparison of the VPI in sixth- and seventh-pandemic strains. The VPI is flanked by 13- and 20-bp imperfect direct repeat sequences having homology to phage attachment (att) sites (24, 28). In a previous study (24), we found evidence that the VPI DNA between both att sites is unique to epidemic strains and absent from nonpathogenic strains, while the DNA outside the left and right att sites is common to all V. cholerae strains. Interestingly, it was recently found that the VPI also appears to have been horizontally transferred and acquired by a Vibrio mimicus strain and that the VPI has the same chromosomal (att site) insertion site as in V. cholerae (2). In the current study, we found that the VPI has the same specific chromosomal insertion site in both N16961 and 395 strains. After performing a complete sequence analysis, we have determined that the N16961 VPI is 41,272 bp and that the 395 VPI is 41,290 bp (excluding the att sites). The percent G+C composition of the VPI from both strains (35.5%) is very different from that of the rest of the host chromosome (ca. 47%) (15), a finding typical of pathogenicity islands (12, 30), and suggests the VPI was acquired from a foreign source. Computer analysis of the VPI sequences revealed the presence of 29 predicted ORFs (of >55 codons) for both strains N16961 and 395. Comparison of our N16961 sequence with that recently published by TIGR (15) revealed a discrepancy (an insertion) in the N16961 tagA gene reported by TIGR. Our sequencing of N16961 and 395 showed that both strains were identical at this site and different from the TIGR sequence. The TIGR genomic sequence analysis of N16961 reported the VPI as 45.3 kb rather than the 41.2 kb that we report here. The 45.3-kb size refers to a larger region of atypical nucleotide composition in N16961 that includes sequences outside the att sequences that we use to define the VPI (J. Heidelberg, personal communication).
There were several long intergenic sequences including one region between acfD and int that was reported to contain three ORFs (OrfZ, OrfW, and OrfV) in a sixth-pandemic strain by Hughes et al. (17) (GenBank accession number U39068). However, our two sequences in this region, which differ at only one base between the two strains, differ at several sites from the published sequence, and the longest ORF is 52 amino acids long. It is quite possible that this region once coded for a protein but a BLAST search did not reveal any compelling homologues of the short ORFs. We found 483 polymorphic nucleotides (1.17% nucleotide difference) between the VPIs of the two strains, of which 60 differences are at the first base position in the codon, 47 occur at the second base, 209 occur at the third base, and 167 occur within intergenic regions. There were 97 amino acid differences (0.8% amino acid difference) between the strains. The level of difference varies greatly along the 41.2-kb length of the VPI (Table 1and Fig. 1) and three segments (left, center, and right in Fig. 1) can be recognized based on the level of difference between the sixth- and seventh-pandemic strains. The four genes in the left segment (orf1 to orf2) covering bases 1 to 8804 and the 15 genes in the right segment (tcpR to int) covering bases 21425 to 41139 show relatively little difference between the two sequences, whereas those in the center (orf3 to tcpC) have higher and varying levels of difference. The intergenic regions follow the same pattern as the genes. In the central segment, the tcpI-tcpP and tcpH-tcpA intergenic regions have particularly high levels of variation, but all intergenic regions in this segment have higher levels than do intergenic regions in the left and right segments. These segments with different levels of variation do not correspond to groupings of genes based on function. Our data are consistent with previous studies (34, 43) showing that the VPI "central region" containing the tcp genes tcpI-tcpC, and tcpA in particular, shows the highest level of variation on the VPI.
|
|
Frameshift differences. Orf2 and Orf3 have no known function as yet, but they differ between the sixth- and seventh-pandemic strains in predicted size and structure. This difference results from a frameshift mutation (no base in N16961 and a T in 395) that alters the last 8 amino acids at the C-terminal end of orf2 in 395, thereby extending the ORF and yielding a truncated Orf3 in 395. Although we treat them as two ORFs, it is also possible that orfs2 and orf3 are a single orf with different single-base deletions disrupting the gene. A similar situation applies to acfD, which appears to have a role in colonization, in which the seventh-pandemic strain has the longer ORF. However, in this case, as has been observed before (17), in the sixth-pandemic strain there is a putative ribosomal frameshift motif, which under special conditions might allow the full ORF to be translated in the sixth-pandemic strain. For the comparisons reported in Table 1, we used the largest translated segment common to both. Importantly, the differences in gene structure and protein size observed between N16961 and 395 in orf2, orf3, and acfD were consistent in other sixth- and seventh-pandemic strains that we tested (unpublished data), suggesting that these differences are maintained in the two clones.
Variation in the ends of the VPI. There is a total of five synonymous substitutions (three in orf2 and two in tcpJ) over 28,518 bp in the left and right segments combined, and we treat these two outer segments together, although there is a slightly higher level of variation in the left segment. We have previously shown (3) that the two pandemic strains are closely related since no mutational changes were detected in three genes. The finding of five synonymous substitutions over 28,518 bp of the VPI is consistent with the left and right segments being derived from the common ancestor, since our previous observation of no change in several housekeeping genes (thought to have been derived from the common ancestor) was based on 3,041 bp of the sequence. One would expect to observe some change if sufficient sequence is analyzed, and it may be that 0.018% synonymous substitution is found when sufficient housekeeping genes have been sequenced from both pandemic strains. Such a value is not inconsistent with our finding of no change in three housekeeping genes (the expectation is 0.5 substitutions in the 3,041 bp).
Values of Ks (synonymous substitution rate), Ka (nonsynonymous substitution rate), and the Ks/Ka ratios are also given in Table 1. Ks is a measure of the rate of synonymous substitutions being the proportion of sites which can undergo substitution without amino acid change and which have done so. Such mutations are generally neutral or of very low adaptive value. Ka is a similar measure for substitutions which do alter an amino acid. Although such mutations can be neutral, most adaptive mutations are in this category. The Ks/Ka ratio is often used as an indicator of neutral or adaptive variation. The Ks/Ka ratios in V. cholerae for the housekeeping genes asd,mdh, and recA are 30.88, 50.52, and 42.32, respectively, as calculated from the data of Karaolis et al. (25) and Byun et al. (3). For the genes in the left and right segments, the total number of substitutions is too low to give a meaningful comparison, although tagA has a value of Ks/Ka (1,7), suggesting that the differences may be due to natural selection rather than mere random genetic drift.Variation in the central segment of the VPI. The central segment from orf3 to tcpC contains much of the tcp gene cluster and has a much higher level of variation, with all genes having higher levels of variation (3.71% averaged over orf3 to tcpC and 1.62% excluding tcpA) than any in the left and right segments. However, tcpA which encodes the major protein subunit of the TCP (47) has by far the most divergence (34, 43). Rhine and Taylor reported that sixth- and seventh-pandemic strains differ in their tcpA sequence by 22.5% at the nucleotide level and by 16.9% at the protein level (43). The Ks/Ka value of 8.69 for tcpA also indicates selective pressure. When they were compared to other genes of the VPI, we also found higher levels of variation in the tagD-tcpI and tcpA-tcpB intergenic regions and higher percentage differences in orf4 (2.34%), tagD (1.21%), tcpP (1.50%), tcpH (2.67%), tcpB (1.46%), tcpQ (1.98%), and tcpC (2.17%).
Evolutionary history of the VPI. The data we have presented on the VPI suggest that the two ends of the VPI had their last common ancestor at about the same time as the two pandemic strains themselves, although this will become clearer when more comparative sequence data is available for housekeeping genes. Thus, one explanation for the data is that following the acquisition of similar VPIs, the central region was substituted in one of the strains by recombination. An alternative explanation for the variation is that the two pandemic strains independently acquired differing VPI regions, most probably via phage infection. However, this does not give as ready an explanation of the variation in the level of divergence between the VPI sequences since it requires two events.
Since we started our studies on the VPI sequence, three new tcpA sequences have been reported. Two tcpA genes (37) are nearly identical to each other but quite different from the tcpA genes of sixth- and seventh-pandemic strains: one was from a clinical O1 strain, and the other was from a O34 nontoxigenic strain. The third (38) is from a toxigenic O53 strain and again differs substantially from the other three forms. In the case of the form isolated from the O1 and O34 strains, restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and heteroduplex mobility analysis was carried out on tcpC/D (900 bp) and tcpE/T (680 bp), and no evidence was found for divergence between the two strains in the flanking segments. These data are consistent with our data in showing that the high divergence level was localized to a specific (i.e., central) region of the VPI. The sharp break at each end of the central segment between genes with an average of 0.3% and those with an average of 1.6% divergence strongly suggests that a recombination event has occurred. The central segment includes tcpA, which encodes the major protein subunit of the TCP. It is known that differences in the TCP lead to differences in antigenic specificity and to substantial specificity in protective immunity (48). The polymorphism in tcpA with a product that is imunogenic and which may interact directly with the human host strongly suggests that it is subject to natural selection, and this may have driven the recombinational substitution of the central region of the VPI. It is also possible that the differences in TcpA affect interactions with various phage using it as a receptor in a way that is subject to selection. The other genes in the central segment having an average level of difference of 1.6% may have simply been part of the donor strain's VPI which was carried along in the recombination. Alternatively, the variation in some of the genes may have contributed to some selective advantage since the differences between two pandemics seem to be, in part at least, subject to natural selection based on the ratio of Ka to Ks (see above).Conclusions. The VPI can also be divided into three functional regions. We use "region" for functional division to distinguish "segment" for recombination segments. The three regions are: (i) the VPI "left region" containing a gene encoding a potential transposase and several ORFs with no known function but which we are currently investigating; (ii) the VPI "central region" containing many of the tcp gene cluster encoding proteins for the TCP structure and also including the tcpPH genes involved in the coordinate regulation of TCP and cholera toxin expression; and (iii) the VPI "right region" including the remaining transport and assembly tcp genes, the toxT regulator of cholera toxin and TCP production, the tcpJ gene (which is required for processing), int (which has high homology to phage-like integrases), and the acf gene cluster (which appears to have a role in colonization). The central segment that has been subjected to recombination does not correspond to the central VPI region containing all of the tcp genes, since the presumed recombination event involved only 7 of the 13 tcp genes, as well as three genes, including tagD of the left region. The recombination segment included tcpA, which has undergone the most change and which may be the gene that conferred all or most of the adaptive advantage leading to the selection for recombination. We have previously reported that V. cholerae appears to have a higher level of genetic exchange (horizontal gene transfer) in its housekeeping genes, including those for the O serogroup antigen, compared to E. coli and Salmonella enterica (3, 25).
The VPI is an essential genetic factor in the virulence of V. cholerae. Our data show that if the two pandemic clones emerged from a common stock, there have been important changes in the VPI during the divergence of the two clones. It is too early to determine the full significance of the changes involved since the function of many VPI genes are yet to be determined. However, it seems that V. cholerae as a species has a pool of variation in the central segment of the VPI and that this has contributed to the emergence and evolution of the pathogenic forms by horizontal gene transfer and recombinational exchange.Nucleotide sequence accession numbers. The nucleotide sequences described here for N16961 and 395 have been deposited in the GenBank database (accession nos. AF325733 and AF325734, respectively).
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Debbie Rothemund for technical assistance.
This work was supported by grants from the NIH (AI45637 to D.K.R.K. and AI19716 to J.B.K.) and the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NH&MRC to P.R.R). D.K.R.K is a recipient of a Burroughs Wellcome Fund Career Award in the Biomedical Sciences.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201. Phone: (410) 706-4718. Fax: (410) 706-4581. E-mail: karaolis{at}umaryland.edu.
Editor: V. J. DiRita
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Barett, J., and P. A. Blake.
1981.
Epidemiological usefulness of changes in hemolytic activity of V. cholerae biotype El Tor during the seventh pandemic.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
13:126-128 |
| 2. |
Boyd, E. F.,
K. E. Moyer,
L. Shi, and M. K. Waldor.
2000.
Infectious CTX and the vibrio pathogenicity island prophage in Vibrio mimicus: evidence for recent horizontal transfer between V. mimicus and V. cholerae.
Infect. Immun.
68:1507-1513 |
| 3. |
Byun, R.,
L. D. H. Elbourne,
R. Lan, and P. R. Reeves.
1999.
Evolutionary relationships of the pathogenic clones of Vibrio cholerae by sequence analysis of four housekeeping genes.
Infect. Immun.
67:1116-1124 |
| 4. | Carroll, P. A., K. T. Tashima, M. B. Rogers, V. J. DiRita, and S. B. Calderwood. 1997. Phase variation in tcpH modulates expression of the ToxR regulation in Vibrio cholerae. Mol. Microbiol. 25:1099-1111[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 5. | DiRita, V. J. 1992. Co-ordinate expression of virulence genes by ToxR in Vibrio cholerae. Mol. Microbiol. 6:451-458[Medline]. |
| 6. |
DiRita, V. J.,
C. Parsot,
G. Jander, and J. J. Mekalanos.
1991.
Regulatory cascade controls virulence in Vibrio cholerae.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
88:5403-5407 |
| 7. |
Feeley, J. C.
1965.
Classification of Vibrio cholerae (Vibrio comma), including E1 Tor vibrios, by intrasubspecific characteristics.
J. Bacteriol.
89:665-678 |
| 8. | Finkelstein, R. A., and S. Muckerjee. 1963. Hemagglutination: a rapid method for differentiating V. cholerae and E1 Tor vibrios. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 112:335-339. |
| 9. | Gallut, J. 1968. Actualité du choléra: evolution des problèmes épidémiologiques et bactériologiques. Bull. Inst. Pasteur 66:219-248. |
| 10. | Gallut, J. 1971. La septième pandémic cholérique. Bull. Soc. Pathol. Exot. (Paris) 64:551-560. |
| 11. |
Gordon, D.,
C. Abajian, and P. Green.
1998.
CONSED a graphical tool for sequence finishing.
PCR Methods Appl.
8:195-202.
|
| 12. | Hacker, J., G. Blum-Oehler, I. Muhldorfer, and H. Tschape. 1997. Pathogenicity islands of virulent bacteria: structure, function and impact on microbial evolution. Mol. Microbiol. 23:1089-1097[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 13. | Hall, R. H., P. A. Vial, J. B. Kaper, J. J. Mekalanos, and M. M. Levine. 1988. Morphological studies on fimbriae expressed by Vibrio cholerae O1. Microb. Pathog. 4:257-265[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 14. |
Häse, C. C., and J. J. Mekalanos.
1998.
TcpP protein is a positive regulator of virulence gene expression in Vibrio cholerae.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:730-734 |
| 15. | Heidelberg, J. F., J. A. Eisen, W. C. Nelson, R. A. Clayton, M. L. Gwinn, R. J. Dodson, D. H. Haft, E. K. Hickey, J. D. Peterson, L. Umayam, S. R. Gill, K. E. Nelson, T. D. Read, H. Tettelin, D. Richardson, M. D. Ermolaeva, J. Vamathevan, S. Bass, H. Qin, I. Dragoi, P. Sellers, L. McDonald, T. Utterback, R. D. Fleishmann, W. C. Nierman, O. White, S. L. Salzberg, H. O. Smith, R. R. Colwell, J. J. Mekalanos, J. C. Venter, and C. M. Fraser. 2000. DNA sequence of both chromosomes of the cholera pathogen Vibrio cholerae. Nature 406:477-483[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 16. |
Herrington, D. A.,
R. H. Hall,
G. A. Losonsky,
J. J. Mekalanos,
R. K. Taylor, and M. M. Levine.
1988.
Toxin, toxin-coregulated pili, and the toxR regulon are essential for Vibrio cholerae pathogenesis in humans.
J. Exp. Med.
168:1487-1492 |
| 17. | Hughes, K. J., K. D. Everiss, M. E. Kovach, and K. M. Peterson. 1994. Sequence analysis of the Vibrio cholerae acfD gene reveals the presence of an overlapping reading frame, orfZ, which encodes a protein that shares sequence similarity to the FliA and FliC products of Salmonella. Gene 146:79-82[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 18. | Iredell, J. R., and P. A. Manning. 1994. Biotype-specific tcpA genes in Vibrio cholerae. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 121:47-54[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 19. | Iredell, J. R., and P. A. Manning. 1994. The toxin-coregulated pilus (TCP) of Vibrio cholerae O1: a model for type IV pilus biogenesis? Trends Microbiol. 2:187-192[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 20. | Iwanaga, M., K. Yamamoto, N. Higa, Y. Ichinose, N. Nakasone, and M. Tanabe. 1986. Culture conditions for stimulating cholera toxin production by Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor. Microbiol. Immunol. 30:1075-1083[Medline]. |
| 21. | Jonson, G., J. Holmgren, and A. M. Svennerholm. 1991. Epitope differences in toxin-coregulated pili produced by classical and El Tor Vibrio cholerae O1. Microb. Pathog. 11:179-188[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 22. |
Jonson, G.,
A. M. Svennerholm, and J. Holmgren.
1992.
Analysis of expression of toxin-coregulated pili in classical and El Tor Vibrio cholerae O1 in vitro and in vivo.
Infect. Immun.
60:4278-4284 |
| 23. | Kaper, J. B., J. G. Morris, Jr., and M. M. Levine. 1995. Cholera. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 8:48-86[Abstract]. |
| 24. |
Karaolis, D. K. R.,
J. A. Johnson,
C. C. Bailey,
E. C. Boedeker,
J. B. Kaper, and P. R. Reeves.
1998.
A Vibrio cholerae pathogenicity island associated with epidemic and pandemic strains.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:3134-3139 |
| 25. |
Karaolis, D. K. R.,
R. Lan, and P. R. Reeves.
1995.
The sixth and seventh cholera pandemics are due to independent clones separately derived from environmental, nontoxigenic, non-O1 Vibrio cholerae.
J. Bacteriol.
177:3191-3198 |
| 26. | Karaolis, D. K. R., S. Somara, D. R. Maneval, Jr., J. A. Johnson, and J. B. Kaper. 1999. A bacteriophage encoding a pathogenicity island, a type-IV pilus and a phage receptor in cholera bacteria. Nature 399:375-379[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 27. | Kovach, M. E., K. J. Hughes, K. D. Everiss, and K. M. Peterson. 1994. Identification of a ToxR-activated gene, tagE, that lies within the accessory colonization factor gene cluster of Vibrio cholerae O395. Gene 148:91-95[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 28. |
Kovach, M. E.,
M. D. Shaffer, and K. M. Peterson.
1996.
A putative integrase gene defines the distal end of a large cluster of ToxR-regulated colonization genes in Vibrio cholerae.
Microbiology
142:2165-2174 |
| 29. |
Kovacikova, G., and K. Skorupski.
2000.
Differential activation of the tcpPH promoter by AphB determines biotype specificity of virulence gene expression in Vibrio cholerae.
J. Bacteriol.
182:3228-3238 |
| 30. | Lee, C. A. 1996. Pathogenicity islands and evolution of bacterial pathogens. Infect. Agents Dis. 5:1-7[Medline]. |
| 31. | Levine, M. M., R. E. Black, M. L. Clements, D. R. Nalin, L. Cisneros, and R. A. Finkelstein. 1981. Volunteer studies in development of vaccines against cholera and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli: a review, p. 443-459. In T. Holme, J. Holmgren, M. H. Merson, and R. Mollby (ed.), Acute enteric infections in children: new prospects for treatment and prevention. Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. |
| 32. |
Levine, M. M.,
J. B. Kaper,
D. Herrington,
G. Losonsky,
J. G. Morris,
M. Clements,
B. R. E.,
B. Tall, and R. Hall.
1988.
Volunteer studies of deletion mutants of Vibrio cholerae O1 prepared by recombinant techniques.
Infect. Immun.
56:161-167 |
| 33. | Li, W.-H. 1993. Unbiased estimation of the rates of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution. J. Mol. Evol. 36:96-99[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 34. | Manning, P. A. 1997. The tcp gene cluster of Vibrio cholerae. Gene 192:63-70[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 35. | Mekalanos, J. J., D. J. Swartz, and G. D. N. Pearson. 1983. Cholera toxin gene: nucleotide sequence, deletion analysis and vaccine development. Nature 306:551-557[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 36. | Miller, V. L., R. K. Taylor, and J. J. Mekalanos. 1987. Cholera toxin transcriptional activator ToxR is a transmembrane DNA binding protein. Cell 48:271-279[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 37. |
Nandy, B.,
R. K. Nandy,
A. C. P. Vicente, and A. C. Ghose.
2000.
Molecular characterization of a new variant of toxin-coregulated pilus protein (TcpA) in a toxigenic non-O1/non-O139 strain of Vibrio cholerae.
Infect. Immun.
68:948-952 |
| 38. | Novais, R. C., A. Coelho, C. A. Salles, and A. C. P. Vicente. 1999. Toxin-coregulated pilus cluster in non-O1, nontoxigenic Vibrio cholerae: evidence of a third allele of pilin gene. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 171:49-55[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 39. | Ogierman, M. A., E. Voss, C. A. Meaney, R. Faast, S. R. Attridge, and P. A. Manning. 1996. Comparison of the promoter proximal regions of the tcp gene cluster in classical and El Tor strains of Vibrio cholerae O1. Gene 170:9-16[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 40. | Ogierman, M. A., S. Zabihi, L. Mourtzois, and P. A. Manning. 1993. Genetic organization and sequence of the promoter-distal region of the tcp gene cluster of Vibrio cholerae. Gene 126:51-60[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 41. | Pollitzer, R. 1959. Cholera. Monograph series 43. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. |
| 42. |
Reeves, P. R.,
L. Farnell, and R. Lan.
1994.
MULTICOMP: a program for preparing sequence data for phylogenetic analysis.
CABIOS
10:281-284 |
| 43. | Rhine, J. A., and R. K. Taylor. 1994. TcpA pilin sequences and colonization requirements for O1 and O139 Vibrio cholerae. Mol. Microbiol. 13:1013-1020[Medline]. |
| 44. | Roy, C., and S. Mukerjee. 1962. Variability in the haemolytic power of El Tor vibrios. Ann. Biochem. Exp. Med. 22:295-296. |
| 45. | Roy, C., S. Mukerjee, and S. J. W. Tanamal. 1963. Haemolytic and non-haemolytic El Tor vibrios. Ann. Biochem. Exp. Med. 23:553-558. |
| 46. | Sharma, D. P., C. Thomas, R. H. Hall, M. M. Levine, and S. R. Attridge. 1989. Significance of toxin-coregulated pilus as protective antigens of Vibrio cholerae on the infant mouse model. Vaccine 7:451-456[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 47. |
Taylor, R. K.,
V. L. Miller,
D. B. Furlong, and J. J. Mekalanos.
1987.
The use of phoA gene fusions to identify a pilus colonization factor coordinately regulated with cholera toxin.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
84:2833-2837 |
| 48. | Voss, E., P. A. Manning, and S. R. Attridge. 1996. The toxin-coregulated pilus is a colonization factor and protective antigen of Vibrio cholerae El Tor. Microb. Pathog. 20:141-153[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 49. | Waldor, M. K., and J. J. Mekalanos. 1996. Lysogenic conversion by a filamentous phage encoding cholera toxin. Science 272:1910-1914[Abstract]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»