Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, May 2001, p. 2815-2820, Vol. 69, No. 5
Ligocyte Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bozeman,
Montana 597181; Department of
Microbiology, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana
597172; and Departments of Pathology and
Microbiology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville,
Virginia 229083
Received 2 October 2000/Returned for modification 30 October
2000/Accepted 25 January 2001
Adhesion interactions during hematogenous dissemination of
Candida albicans likely involve a complex array of host and
fungal factors. Possible C. albicans factors include
changes in cell surface hydrophobicity and exposed antigens that have
been shown in static adhesion assays to influence attachment events. We
used a novel in vitro shear analysis system to investigate
host-pathogen interactions and the role of fungal cell surface
hydrophobicity in adhesion events with human endothelial cells under
simulated physiologic shear. Endothelial monolayers were grown in
capillary tubes and tested with and without interleukin-1 While multiple host and fungal
factors contribute to development of disseminated candidiasis (reviewed
in references 39 and 44), the capacity of Candida
albicans to adhere to many different host tissues is broadly
considered a virulence trait to initiate invasive activity (12,
29). The dissemination process likely begins by fungal cells
gaining access to the bloodstream through gastrointestinal persorption,
by seeding from a biofilm-fouled intramedic device, or through
trauma-related inoculation (10, 23, 49). Exit from the
vasculature is thought to occur by penetration through endothelial
cells lining the vessels, except for possible direct attachment to
extracellular matrix (ECM) components that are normally exposed in
kidney glomerular regions or exposed during vascular damage or
inflammation (35). Thus, successful attachment of C. albicans cells to vascular endothelial cells or exposed ECM during
hematogenous distribution appears crucial for subsequent tissue
invasion and development of organ pathologies (34).
Adhesion interactions between C. albicans and host vascular
tissues may be very efficient, as murine models of dissemination indicate that intravenously administered yeast cells rapidly disappear from circulating blood (13). Static adhesion assays have
described C. albicans (and Candida spp.)
molecules that could facilitate binding during dissemination. They
include integrin analogues (reviewed in references 22 and
29); ligands for CD11b and CD18 (17); mannosylated
and nonmannosylated components that bind endothelial cells
(14-16) or spleen and lymph node macrophages (32,
37); ALS gene products expressed in vivo
(30) that promote adhesion to endothelial cells,
epithelial cells, and ECM proteins (18, 19); ECM-binding
mannoproteins (reviewed in reference 8), including an
Based on the above list, Candida may follow an emerging
theme for microbial pathogenesis in the utilization of host cell
adhesion molecules and receptor ligands, either directly or through
molecular mimicry, to anchor invasive activities (reviewed in
references 38, 47, and 54). A major consideration for
defining vascular adhesins of C. albicans is the variability
of surface antigens (reviewed in reference 8) and the
associated changes in cell surface hydrophobicity (CSH) that occur
during normal growth and morphogenesis of C. albicans, both
in vivo and in vitro (21, 24, 27). Adhesion studies show,
either directly or by inference from the stated growth conditions, that
hydrophobic C. albicans cells adhere better and with greater
site diversity than hydrophilic cells to endothelial cells, epithelial
cells, ECM proteins, and other host tissues (8, 11, 16, 20,
25). Thus, surface antigenic changes related to hydrophobicity
may provide a fungal virulence strategy for evasion of immune responses
and for selective adhesion interactions with host cells.
Our interest in defining the role of CSH on adhesion interactions with
endothelial cells during vascular dissemination led us to use a novel
assay system (ProteoFlow; LigoCyte Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bozeman,
Mont.) that was developed for studying leukocyte interactions with
vascular endothelium under simulated physiological shear
(3). With system adaptations for host-pathogen
interactions, analysis of C. albicans binding showed rapid
interactions with human endothelial cells under physiologic shear. Both
C. albicans CSH status and the endothelial activation status
influenced the number of host-pathogen interactions. Hydrophobic
C. albicans binding in the vascular modeling system could be
blocked by one of the same anti-hydrophobic protein monoclonal
antibodies (MAbs) that blocked attachment to ECM proteins
(40). These studies provide new information about the
dynamics of C. albicans-host adherence phenomena that may
well have important implications in design of novel therapeutic
approaches against candidiasis.
C. albicans isolates and culture conditions.
C. albicans A9 (55), LGH1095 (1),
and ATCC 90029 were maintained as MAb reagents.
The anti-Candida MAbs and control
MAbs used in this study are listed in Table
1. The hydrophobicity and cell wall
location of the Candida antigens are previously noted in
work describing separations of cell wall components by hydrophobic
interaction chromatography and generation of polyclonal antiserum
against the hydrophobic protein fractions for tracking in vivo
expression (21, 27). The MAbs to C. albicans
hydrophobic proteins were produced at the University of Virginia Health
System Lymphocyte Culture Center (9) as described
elsewhere (40). Serum-free antibody preparations of MAbs
6C5, 5D8, and EL246 were produced by LigoCyte Pharmaceuticals from
hybridoma cultures grown in serum-free tissue culture medium, followed
by ammonium sulfate precipitation of supernatant fluids and exhaustive
dialysis against phosphate-buffered saline. The control immunoglobulin
G2a (IgG2a) antibody, UPC-10 (M9144; Sigma Chemical), was
0019-9567/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/IAI.69.5.2815-2820.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Inhibition of Hydrophobic Protein-Mediated
Candida albicans Attachment to Endothelial Cells during
Physiologic Shear Flow
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
activation
in buffered medium containing human serum. Hydrophobic and hydrophilic stationary-phase C. albicans yeast cells were infused into
the system under shear flow and found to adhere with widely varying efficiencies. The average number of adherent foci was determined from
multiple fields, sampled via video microscopy, between 8 and 12 min
after infusion. Hydrophobic C. albicans cells demonstrated significantly more heterotypic binding events
(Candida-endothelial cell) and greater homotypic binding
events (Candida-Candida) than hydrophilic yeast cells.
Cytokine activation of the endothelium significantly increased binding
by hydrophobic C. albicans compared to unactivated host
cells. Preincubation of hydrophobic yeast cells with a monoclonal
antibody against hydrophobic cell wall proteins significantly blocked
adhesion interactions with the endothelial monolayers. Because the
antibody also blocks C. albicans binding to laminin and
fibronectin, results suggest that vascular adhesion events with
endothelial cells and exposed extracellular matrix may be blocked
during C. albicans dissemination. Future studies will
address the protective efficacy of blocking or redirecting blood-borne
fungal cells to favor host defense mechanisms.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
5
1 integrin-like fibronectin receptor (50); and
ECM-binding hydrophobic surface proteins (40, 52).
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
80°C glycerol stocks and were
subcultured aerobically at 23 and 37°C in 2% glucose-0.3% yeast
extract-1% peptone broth (GYEP), in 0.055 M sodium phosphate (pH
7.2)-buffered yeast nitrogen base plus amino acids (Difco) containing
2% glucose (YNB2G), or in antibiotic medium 3 (Difco) with 2% glucose
(AM3-2G). Stationary-phase cultures were harvested from a third
subculture (1) and washed three times in cold, sterile
distilled H2O, the concentration was determined, and CSH
was assessed by the hydrophobic microsphere assay (28).
Stationary-phase yeast cultures grown at 23°C were hydrophobic
(typical CSH values
92%), while those grown at 37°C were
hydrophilic (typical CSH values
8%). Harvested yeast aliquots were held on ice as pellets and used within 4 h. We also
determined for each yeast population the sphere-to-cell unit (S:C)
ratio, which is a measurement reflecting the abundance of singlet
blastoconidia (24). For example, a mother-daughter
combination would be two spheres but one contiguous cell unit. S:C
ratios of
2:1 reflect stationary-phase yeast cultures and were
important for establishing the amount of Candida-Candida
adhesion observed in these assays.
haplotype
similar to MAbs 6C5 and 5D8.
TABLE 1.
MAb reagents used in this study
In vitro shear analysis of C. albicans adhesion to
HUVECs.
An in vitro flow system (ProteoFlow; LigoCyte
Pharmaceuticals) to analyze adhesion events under simulated physiologic
shear across mammalian cells or tissue components was used as described previously (3), with modification for the
Candida work as follows. Human umbilical vein endothelial
cells (HUVECs) were harvested and prepared as previously described
(3) or obtained commercially (Clonetics, San Diego,
Calif.). HUVEC monolayers were grown on the lumenal surface of glass
capillary tubes. Some monolayers were pre-activated for 1 h with
interleukin-1
(IL-1
; 10 ng/ml; Genzyme Diagnostics, Cambridge,
Mass.) to upregulate expression of cellular adhesion molecules like
E-selectin (reviewed in reference 33), rinsed, and placed
in fresh medium for 120 min prior to the assay. Each capillary tube was
inspected, and only those having satisfactory monolayer development
(>75%) along the tube length were used for the assays.
10 fields per capillary)
along the HUVEC monolayer to document numbers of attached yeast cells.
For recording each field of view, the microscope was adjusted through
multiple focal planes to ensure distinction of yeast bound to the HUVEC
surface. Video records were analyzed offline, and the internal time
stamp on each video frame was used to identify the respective fields of view.
Evaluation of C. albicans binding.
Two types of
binding events were observed for C. albicans in the
ProteoFlow system. Heterotypic binding events were defined as
Candida-to-HUVEC adhesion interactions that produced focal attachment sites. The average number of foci per n fields of
view was calculated for each assay. Homotypic binding events were
defined as Candida-to-Candida interactions that
occurred when a yeast cell from bulk fluid flow attached to an already
bound yeast cell at a focal attachment site. To record the amount of
homotypic binding events under physiologic shear, each focus in a field of view was evaluated for the number of blastoconidia attached at that
site and recorded as ranked values of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 to 9, 10 to 15, and
16 blastoconidia per focal site. The ranks with three or more
attached blastoconidia were considered the result of homotypic binding
based on the S:C ratios of the Candida populations used for
these shear experiments. To compare the amounts of homotypic binding
between treatment and control assays, the average number of foci in
the
3 blastoconidial ranks for n fields was
determined. In some assays, the average number of total blastoconidia
per field was estimated from ranked data, using values of 7, 12.5, and
16 spheres for the number of bound blastoconidia in the three larger ranks.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Adaptation of in vitro shear system for adhesion studies with Candida. The ProteoFlow system was tested as a means of investigating host-pathogen adhesion interactions under simulated physiologic shear. Several methodological variables were addressed before the shear assay could be used to evaluate C. albicans binding to endothelial cells under shear flow.
Preliminary studies showed that the data capture could be performed either by monitoring a single field of view over time or by sampling multiple fields within a given period during the assay. The second data capture method was chosen to provide multiple sample fields for statistical evaluation of adhesion interactions. Shear assay tests performed with assay medium containing 5% serum, a typical level utilized in leukocyte studies (3), revealed similar Candida binding levels between certain human donor serum and fetal bovine serum. For all assays reported here (representative data from at least three replicates), a single human donor was selected based on immunoassay screens for low reactivity to hydrophobic and hydrophilic cell wall antigens (data not shown). Serial samples from the donor were monitored to ensure comparable, low anti-Candida reactivity. The HUVEC monolayers were activated on a staggered schedule to ensure similar time intervals before use of the monolayers in adhesion studies. In experiments with HUVECs from single donors, differences in the average heterotypic binding supported by HUVECs were noted (data not shown). Such donor differences in adhesion interactions with C. albicans were anticipated, as observed in other endothelial adhesion studies (51). All data presented in this report were obtained in shear assays involving pooled donor HUVECs. In general, the preliminary studies revealed that the binding of Candida cells out of bulk fluid flow to attachment sites on endothelial cells occurs very rapidly. Offline analysis demonstrated that yeast cells could be moving with fluid flow in two video frames and then be completely stopped in the next two frames (30 frames/s). For both hydrophobic and hydrophilic yeast cell populations, the attachment occurred rapidly. Bound Candida cells occasionally (estimated <5% of foci) detached and rejoined bulk fluid flow.Influence of CSH status on attachment to activated HUVECs.
The
impact of C. albicans CSH status on adhesion events with
IL-1
-activated HUVECs was tested under simulated physiologic shear.
Assay results show that hydrophobic cells bind significantly (P < 0.001) more than hydrophilic cells for C. albicans
isolates grown in defined media (Fig. 1).
The total height of each bar shows the average number of focal
attachments per field (n > 10 fields per assay)
produced by hydrophobic and hydrophilic yeast cells. This average foci
value represents the average amount of heterotypic binding
(Candida-HUVEC) observed in an assay, because each focus
started with a heterotypic binding event. Results shown for the three
Candida isolates in Fig. 1 typify overall findings that
hydrophobic cells show significantly greater heterotypic binding than
hydrophilic cells to endothelial monolayers.
|
3 blastoconidial ranks, where the
3
blastoconidial rank indicates the extent of homotypic binding (Candida-Candida). The S:C ratios (described in Materials
and Methods) for these cultures were 1.18:1 for hydrophobic and 1.09:1 for hydrophilic A9wt cells, 1.30:1 for hydrophobic and 1.16:1 for
hydrophilic LGH1095 cells, and 1.50:1 for hydrophobic and 1.26:1 for
hydrophilic ATCC 90029 cells. These low S:C ratios indicate that the
yeast cell populations used for the adhesion assays were predominantly
singlet blastoconidia with few mother-daughter combinations and rare,
if any, contiguous triplet spheres as a cell unit. Results show that
hydrophobic yeast cells support significantly more homotypic binding
events than hydrophilic yeast cells under simulated physiologic shear
(P < 0.001 for comparison of the average foci in the
3 blastoconidia ranks for hydrophobic versus hydrophilic cells for
each C. albicans isolate shown Fig. 1 [Mann-Whitney rank
sum Test]). The tendency of hydrophobic cells to show more homotypic
binding than hydrophilic cells was consistent in numerous in vitro
shear experiments (at least eight replicates) regardless of the growth
medium chosen.
In some experiments with hydrophilic cells, we stopped the flow while
viewing a field with no attached yeast at the end of the 8- to 12-min
sampling period. Yeast cells from bulk flow were allowed to gravity
settle onto the HUVEC monolayer for 5 to 10 min, but none remained in
the field of view once flow was restored.
Effect of IL-1
activation of endothelial cells on C. albicans attachment.
Adhesion of hydrophobic C. albicans A9 yeast cells was tested on HUVEC monolayers that were
unactivated or activated with the proinflammatory cytokine IL-1
. The
average binding on activated HUVECs was 23.6 ± 6.9 (SD) foci per
field (n = 14), compared to 12.0 ± 3.8 (SD) foci
(n = 14 fields) for unactivated monolayers. The
difference in heterotypic binding interactions was significant (P < 0.001, Student t test). Evaluation of
the homotypic binding interactions indicated that activated HUVECs
supported an average of 13.2 ± 4.6 (SD) foci in
3
blastoconidial ranks, whereas unactivated HUVECs showed 4.4 ± 1.4 (SD) foci. The difference in homotypic binding values was also
significant (P < 0.001, Mann-Whitney rank sum test).
Effect of MAb treatment on C. albicans attachment under
shear flow.
MAbs 6C5 and 5D8 recognize hydrophobic proteins of 38 and 37 kDa, respectively, and effectively inhibit C. albicans cell attachment to ECM proteins in static adhesion assays
(40). To test whether these antibodies would inhibit
adhesion to HUVEC monolayers under shear, we preincubated hydrophobic
yeast cells with the anti-Candida MAbs or the control IgG2a
antibody and infused the suspension into the system. Results (Fig.
2) of in vitro shear analysis show that
MAb 6C5 caused significant inhibition of hydrophobic yeast cell binding
to IL-1
-activated endothelial cells compared to both the control
yeast-only and control IgG2a treatment groups (P < 0.001 for each pairwise multiple comparison, Tukey test). In
contrast, pretreatment with MAb 5D8 did not significantly inhibit hydrophobic C. albicans yeast cell binding to activated
HUVECs compared to control treatment groups.
|
3 blastoconidia and
total bound blastoconidia compared to control yeast only (P < 0.001 for both t tests). Inhibition of homotypic
binding by treatment with MAb 6C5 was also significantly different from
that of control MAb EL246 treatment (P = 0.003 for
average foci and P = 0.001 for total blastoconidia,
t tests). The homotypic binding differences between yeast
only and EL246 pretreatment for both average foci and total
blastoconidia were not significant (P = 0.114 and
P = 0.06, respectively, for t tests).
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Functional analysis of host-pathogen adhesion interactions occurring during vascular dissemination presents various limitations for in vitro modeling. Previous adhesion studies for Candida spp. or other microorganisms have generally been done either under static conditions with target host cells or under flow conditions with parallel plate chambers and no host cells (for examples, see references 6, 14 to 16, 41, and 48). Both types of assays miss reconstituting the interface between a host fluid and a host tissue with appropriate physiological shear forces, such as the high shear vascular interface in capillary beds or the peristaltic shear interface present across intestinal epithelial cells. To address these limitations, we used the ProteoFlow system to investigate adhesion interactions of C. albicans with endothelial monolayers under simulated physiologic shear. Prior application of the in vitro shear system has been instrumental in characterizing complex host-host adhesion interactions and in distinguishing shear-dependent and shear-independent interactions that happen during lymphocyte homing and leukocyte recruitment to endothelial surfaces (3, 31). The in vitro shear data on adhesion interactions and the effects of blocking compounds correlate well with in vivo experimental evidence for various host-host cell interactions (3).
C. albicans binding interactions with endothelial cells
under shear flow revealed the capacity to form rapid, tight adhesions with host cells. This type of binding behavior by C. albicans is similar to the rapid adhesion interactions between
leukocytes and activated
4 integrin receptors on endothelial cells
(2, 4). Candida cells also acted like
leukocytes in their ability to undergo homotypic binding events.
Rolling adhesion behavior for C. albicans cells, analogous
to selectin-mediated leukocyte rolling on activated HUVECs
(3), was not observed in any of the assays.
Both a fungal variable and a host variable that influence vascular
adhesion events under physiological shear forces, were identified. CSH
status of the C. albicans yeast cells influenced adhesion to
the human endothelial cells, with hydrophobic C. albicans cells showing greater heterotypic and homotypic binding capabilities than hydrophilic yeast cells. The relatively short assay times (<15
min in total) for the shear assays help ensure that the yeast cells
maintain their original CSH values (24). Because
stationary-phase 37°C yeast cultures are not 100% hydrophilic cells
(typical CSH values
8%), the few yeast cells binding from
hydrophilic cultures may actually be hydrophobic cells present in the
cultures. For example, 143 total blastoconidia bound (Fig. 1, 18 fields
of view) in the hydrophilic ATCC 90029 assay could be amply accounted
for by hydrophobic cells in the hydrophilic culture (total adherent yeast much less than 8% of 2.1 × 107 yeast infused).
With both hydrophilic and hydrophobic cell surfaces expressed in vivo
(21), our study suggests that hydrophobic cells would have
an advantage for broader distribution during vascular dissemination
events. Ex vivo adhesion assay differences in binding by hydrophobic
versus hydrophilic yeast cells to various tissues would also support
broader distribution based on CSH status (25).
The host variable demonstrated by the results is that activation of
HUVECs with the proinflammatory cytokineIL-1
supported significantly
more binding by hydrophobic C. albicans cells. IL-1
activation of the HUVEC layer increases surface expression of cell
adhesion molecules including selectins (e.g., E-selectin [3]), as
well as integrin receptors such as intracellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) and ICAM-2 (reviewed in references 7 and 53).
Although ICAM-2 is expressed constitutively on the endothelial cells
(33), cytokine activation increases levels of both ICAM-1 and ICAM-2 well above baseline. The increase in yeast cell binding observed here may be due to upregulation of these host adhesion molecules upon exposure to IL-1
. These results contrast with a
report by Gustafson et al. where tumor necrosis factor activation of
the HUVEC monolayer did not increase binding by Candida
(22). The reason may be that static-versus-stimulated
physiologic shear assays reveal a difference in shear-dependent and
shear-independent host-pathogen interactions. Adhesion differences have
been reported for yeast cells in static assays compared to ones
performed under bulk liquid flow across various synthetic substrata
(reviewed in reference 5, 6, 42, and 43).
The amount of homotypic binding shown for C. albicans
correlates with expression of yeast cell hydrophobicity and with
IL-1
activation of HUVECs. The later suggests that endothelial
cell-derived components that increase during inflammation could provide
a molecular bridge for the observed yeast cell-yeast cell binding
rather than a direct yeast-to-yeast interaction. The Candida
homotypic binding behavior revealed with the ProteoFlow system may be
analogous to coadhesion events that others have reported, but preferred to limit, in static assays (41). The impact of homotypic
binding events on Candida pathogenesis is unknown, but the
formation of vascular microcolonies could amplify a local infectious
burden and influence phagocytic clearance of fungal cells during dissemination.
Pretreatment of the hydrophobic C. albicans cells with MAb 6C5, but not MAb 5D8, decreased both heterotypic and homotypic binding events with activated endothelial cells. In previous studies, both antibodies inhibited hydrophobic C. albicans interactions with laminin and fibronectin (40). The differential capacity of MAb 6C5 to inhibit adhesion in these studies suggests that the 38-kDa hydrophobic protein antigen may play a direct role in mediating attachment to endothelial cells during dissemination. However, based on hydrophobicity theories describing forces acting through primary and secondary interaction distances (reviewed in reference 26), the blocking effect of an anti-hydrophobic protein MAb could result from direct blocking of an adhesin function, by steric hindrance of an adhesin, or by changing the hydrophobic interactive capacity of the yeast cell surface. The abundance and relative exposure of the 6C5 and 5D8 antigens on hydrophobic C. albicans surfaces require further characterization before an endothelial adhesin role for the 6C5 hydrophobic protein can be defined. Another approach in defining the inhibition mechanism would be to investigate the blocking effect of antibodies that recognize hydrophilic cell wall components displayed on hydrophobic C. albicans cells. This approach will be tested once such an anti-hydrophilic protein antibody is available.
Our current hypothesis is that the greater virulence of hydrophobic cells compared to hydrophilic cells is due to the prominent role of hydrophobic interactions in yeast cell attachment to vascular endothelium and exposed ECM. The evidence presented here based on the physiologic shear assay supports this hypothesis and further suggests that inhibition of hydrophobic interactions could affect pathogenesis by modulating the distribution of fungal cells during vascular dissemination and possibly favoring host defense mechanisms.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported with funds from LigoCyte Pharmaceuticals, Inc., by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease grants R01AI31048 (K.C.H.), RO1AI24912 (J.E.C.), and POIAI37194 (J.E.C.), and by Pfizer, Inc.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: LigoCyte Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 920 Technology Blvd., Suite C, Bozeman, MT 59718. Phone: (406) 585-2733. Fax: (406) 585-2766. E-mail: pati.glee{at}ligocyte.com.
Editor: T. R. Kozel
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Antley, P. P., and K. C. Hazen.
1988.
Role of yeast cell growth temperature on Candida albicans virulence in mice.
Infect. Immun.
56:2884-2890 |
| 2. |
Bargatze, R. F.,
M. A. Jutila, and E. C. Butcher.
1995.
Distinct roles for L-selectin, 4 integrin, and LFA-1 in lymphocyte interactions with HEV in situ: the multi-step model confirmed and refined.
Immunity
3:99-108[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 3. | Bargatze, R. F., S. Kurk, G. Watts, T. K. Kishimoto, C. A. Speer, and M. A. Jutila. 1994. In vivo and in vitro functional examination of a conserved epitope of L- and E-selectin crucial for leukocyte-endothelial cell interactions. J. Immunol. 152:5814-5825[Abstract]. |
| 4. |
Berlin, C.,
R. F. Bargatze,
J. J. Campbell,
U. H. von Andrian,
M. C. Szabo,
S. R. Hasslen,
R. D. Nelson,
E. L. Berg,
S. L. Erlandsen, and E. C. Butcher.
1995.
4 integrins mediate lymphocyte attachment and rolling under physiologic flow.
Cell
80:413-422[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 5. |
Busscher, H. J.,
J. Noordmans,
J. Meinders, and H. C. van der Mei.
1991.
Analysis of the spatial arrangement of microorganisms adhering to solid surfaces methods of presenting results.
Biofouling
4:71-79.
|
| 6. | Busscher, H. J., and H. C. Van der Mei. 1995. Use of flow chamber devices and image analysis methods to study microbial adhesion. Methods Enzymol. 253:455-477[Medline]. |
| 7. |
Carlos, T. M., and J. M. Harlan.
1994.
Leukocyte-endothelial adhesion molecules.
Blood
84:2068-2101 |
| 8. |
Chaffin, W. L.,
J. L. Lopez-Ribot,
M. Casanova,
D. Gozalbo, and J. P. Martínez.
1998.
Cell wall and secreted proteins of Candida albicans: identification, function, and expression.
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
62:130-180 |
| 9. | Chang, J.-H., W. M. Sutherland, and S. J. Parsons. 1994. Monoclonal antibodies to oncoproteins. Methods Enzymol. 254:430-435. |
| 10. | Cole, G. T., A. A. Halawa, and E. J. Anaissie. 1996. The role of the gastrointestinal tract in hematogenous candidiasis: from the laboratory to the bedside. Clin. Infect. Dis. 22(Suppl. 2):S73-S78. |
| 11. |
Cutler, J. E.,
D. L. Brawner,
K. C. Hazen, and M. A. Jutila.
1990.
Characteristics of Candida albicans adherence to mouse tissues.
Infect. Immun.
58:1902-1908 |
| 12. | Cutler, J. E., Y. Han, and D. Miller. 1996. Fungal factors implicated in pathogenesis, p. 3-29. In D. H. Howard (ed.), The Mycota. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. Germany. |
| 13. | Evans, Z. A., and D. N. Mardon. 1977. Organ localization in mice challenged with a typical Candida albicans strain and a pseudohyphal variant. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 155:234-238[Medline]. |
| 14. |
Filler, S. G.,
B. O. Ibe,
A. S. Ibrahim,
M. A. Ghannoum,
J. U. Raj, and J. E. Edwards, Jr.
1994.
Mechanisms by which Candida albicans induces endothelial cell prostaglandin synthesis.
Infect. Immun.
62:1064-1069 |
| 15. | Filler, S. G., B. O. Ibe, P. M. Luckett, J. U. Raj, and J. E. Edwards, Jr. 1991. Candida albicans stimulates endothelial cell eicosanoid production. J. Infect. Dis. 164:928-935[Medline]. |
| 16. | Filler, S. G., A. S. Pfunder, B. J. Spellberg, J. P. Spellberg, and J. E. Edwards, Jr. 1996. Candida albicans stimulates cytokine production and leukocyte adhesion molecule expression by endothelial cells. Infect. Immun. 64:2609-2617[Abstract]. |
| 17. |
Forsyth, C. B.,
E. F. Plow, and L. Zhang.
1998.
Interaction of the fungal pathogen Candida albicans with integrin CD11b/CD18: recognition by the I domain is modulated by the lectin-like domain and the CD18 subunit.
J. Immunol.
161:6198-6205 |
| 18. |
Fu, Y.,
G. Rieg,
W. A. Fonzi,
P. H. Belanger,
J. E. Edwards, Jr., and S. G. Filler.
1998.
Expression of the Candida albicans gene ALS1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae induces adherence to endothelial and epithelial cells.
Infect. Immun.
66:1783-1786 |
| 19. |
Gaur, N. K.,
S. A. Klotz, and R. L. Henderson.
1999.
Overexpression of the Candida albicans ALA1 gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae results in aggregation following attachment of yeast cells to extracellular matrix proteins, adherence properties similar to those of Candida albicans.
Infect. Immun.
67:6040-6047 |
| 20. | Glee, P. M., J. Masuoka, W. T. Ozier, and K. C. Hazen. 1996. Presence of multiple laminin- and fibronectin-binding proteins in cell wall extract of Candida albicans: influence of dialysis. J. Med. Vet. Mycol. 34:57-61[Medline]. |
| 21. | Glee, P. M., P. Sundstrom, and K. C. Hazen. 1995. Expression of surface hydrophobic proteins by Candida albicans in vivo. Infect. Immun. 63:1373-1379[Abstract]. |
| 22. | Gustafson, K. S., G. M. Vercellotti, C. M. Bendel, and M. K. Hostetter. 1991. Molecular mimicry in Candida albicans. J. Clin. Investig. 87:1896-1902. |
| 23. |
Hawser, S. P., and L. J. Douglas.
1994.
Biofilm formation by Candida species on the surface of catheter materials in vitro.
Infect. Immun.
62:915-921 |
| 24. |
Hazen, B. W., and K. C. Hazen.
1988.
Dynamic expression of cell surface hydrophobicity during initial yeast cell growth and before germ tube formation of Candida albicans.
Infect. Immun.
56:2521-2525 |
| 25. |
Hazen, K. C.,
D. L. Brawner,
M. H. Riesselman,
J. E. Cutler, and M. A. Jutila.
1991.
Differential adherence of hydrophobic and hydrophilic Candida albicans yeast cells to mouse tissues.
Infect. Immun.
59:907-912 |
| 26. | Hazen, K. C., and P. M. Glee. 1995. Cell surface hydrophobicity and medically important fungi. Curr. Top. Med. Mycol. 6:1-37[Medline]. |
| 27. |
Hazen, K. C., and B. W. Hazen.
1992.
Hydrophobic surface protein masking by the opportunistic fungal pathogen Candida albicans.
Infect. Immun.
60:1499-1508 |
| 28. | Hazen, K. C., and B. W. Hazen. 1987. A polystyrene microsphere assay for detecting surface hydrophobicity variations within Candida albicans populations. J. Microbiol. Methods 6:289-299[CrossRef]. |
| 29. | Hostetter, M. K. 1998. Linkage of adhesion, morphogenesis, and virulence in Candida albicans. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 132:258-263[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 30. |
Hoyer, L. L.,
J. Clevenger,
J. E. Hecht,
E. J. Ehrhart, and F. M. Poulet.
1999.
Detection of Als proteins on the cell wall of Candida albicans in murine tissues.
Infect. Immun.
67:4251-4255 |
| 31. |
Jutila, M. A.,
R. F. Bargatze,
S. Kurk,
R. A. Warnock,
N. Ehsani,
S. R. Watson, and B. Walcheck.
1994.
Cell surface P- and E-selectin support shear-dependent rolling of bovine / T cells.
J. Immunol.
153:3917[Abstract].
|
| 32. |
Kanbe, T., and J. E. Cutler.
1998.
Minimum chemical requirements for adhesin activity of the acid-stable part of Candida albicans cell wall phosphomannoprotein complex.
Infect. Immun.
66:5812-5818 |
| 33. |
Kansas, G. S.
1996.
Selectins and their ligands: current concepts and controversies.
Blood
88:3259-3287 |
| 34. | Klotz, S. A. 1992. Fungal adherence to the vascular compartment: a critical step in the pathogenesis of disseminated candidiasis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 14:340-347[Medline]. |
| 35. | Klotz, S. A., and R. L. Smith. 1991. A fibronectin receptor on Candida albicans mediates adherence of the fungus to extracellular matrix. J. Infect. Dis. 163:604-610[Medline]. |
| 36. | Ley, K., M. Cerrito, and K. E. Arfors. 1991. Sulfated polysaccharides inhibit leukocyte rolling in rabbit mesentery venules. Am. J. Physiol. 260:1667-1673. |
| 37. |
Li, R.-K., and J. E. Cutler.
1993.
Chemical definition of an epitope/adhesin molecule on Candida albicans.
J. Biol. Chem.
268:18293-18299 |
| 38. |
Marcantonio, E. E., and R. O. Hynes.
1988.
Antibodies to the conserved cytoplasmic domain of the integrin 1 subunit react with proteins in vertebrates, invertebrates, and fungi.
J. Cell Biol.
106:1765-1772 |
| 39. | Maródi, L. 1997. Local and systemic host defense mechanisms aainst Candida: immunopathology of candidal infections. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 16:795-801[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 40. | Masuoka, J., G. Wu, P. M. Glee, and K. C. Hazen. 1999. Inhibition of Candida albicans attachment to extracellular matrix by antibodies which recognize hydrophobic cell wall proteins. FEMS Microbiol. Immunol. 24:421-429[CrossRef]. |
| 41. | Mayer, C. L., S. G. Filler, and J. E. Edwards, Jr. 1992. Candida adherence to endothelial cells. Microvasc. Res. 43:218-226[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 42. | Millsap, K. W., R. Bos, H. J. Busscher, and H. C. Van der Mei. 1999. Surface aggregation of Candida albicans on glass in the absence and presence of adhering Streptococcus gordonii in a parallel-plate flow chamber: a surface thermodynamic analysis based on acid-base interactions. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 212:495-502[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 43. | Millsap, K. W., R. Bos, H. C. Van der Mei, and H. J. Busscher. 1999. Influence of aeration of Candida albicans during culturing on their surface aggregation in the presence of adhering Streptococcus gordonii. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 26:69-74[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 44. | Odds, F. C. 1994. Pathogenesis of Candida infections. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 31:S2-S5[Medline]. |
| 45. | Perry, M. A., and D. N. Granger. 1991. Role of CD11/CD18 in shear rate-dependent leukocyte-endothelial cell interactions in cat mesenteric venules. J. Clin. Investig. 87:1798-1804. |
| 46. |
Pincus, S. H.,
M. J. Smith,
H. J. Jennings,
J. B. Burritt, and P. M. Glee.
1998.
Peptides that mimic the group B streptococcal type III capsular polysaccharide antigen.
J. Immunol.
160:293-298 |
| 47. | Rostand, K. S., and J. D. Esko. 1997. Microbial adherence to and invasion through proteoglycans. Infect. Immun. 65:1-8[Medline]. |
| 48. | Rozdzinski, E., and E. Toumanen. 1995. Adhesion of microbial pathogens to leukocyte integrins: methods to study ligand mimicry. Methods Enzymol. 253:3-26[Medline]. |
| 49. |
Samonis, G.,
E. J. Anaissie, and G. P. Bodey.
1990.
Effects of broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents on yeast colonization of the gastrointestinal tracts of mice.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
34:2420-2422 |
| 50. |
Santoni, G.,
A. Gismondi,
J. H. Liu,
A. Punturieri,
A. Santoni,
L. Frati,
M. Piccoli, and J. Y. Djeu.
1994.
Candida albicans expresses a fibronectin receptor antigenically related to 5 1 integrin.
Microbiology
140:2971-2979[Abstract].
|
| 51. | Segal, E., and H. Sandovsky-Losica. 1995. Adhesion and interaction of Candida albicans with mammalian tissues in vitro and in vivo. Methods Enzymol. 253:439-452[Medline]. |
| 52. | Silva, T. M. J., P. M. Glee, and K. C. Hazen. 1995. Influence of cell surface hydrophobicity on attachment of Candida albicans to extracellular matrix proteins. J. Med. Vet. Mycol. 33:117-122[Medline]. |
| 53. | Springer, T. A. 1990. Adhesion receptors of the immune system. Nature 346:425-434[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 54. | Tuomanen, E. 1993. Subversion of leukocyte adhesin systems by respiratory pathogens. ASM News 59:292-296. |
| 55. |
Whelan, W. L.,
J. M. Delga,
E. Wadsworth,
T. J. Walsh,
K. J. Kwon-Chung,
R. Calderone, and P. N. Lipke.
1990.
Isolation and characterization of cell surface mutants of Candida albicans.
Infect. Immun.
58:1552-1557 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| J. Bacteriol. | J. Virol. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|
| Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. | Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | All ASM Journals |
|---|