Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, October 2002, p. 5873-5876, Vol. 70, No. 10
0019-9567/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/IAI.70.10.5873-5876.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Departments of Medicine,1 Molecular Microbiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110,3 Department of Pathophysiology, A-1090 Vienna, Austria2
Received 20 May 2002/ Returned for modification 14 June 2002/ Accepted 28 June 2002
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
SCID-HU-INT mice were generated by engrafting human colonic sections into the rear flanks and suprascapular regions of 6- to 8-week-old SCID mice as previously described (7). After a 12-week engraftment period, groups of eight SCID-HU-INT mice received intraperitoneal (i.p.) and intraluminal (human colonic xenograft) injections of 200 µg of purified monoclonal antibody EH5 or of the isotype-matched control monoclonal antibody 1B10 (antiphosphorylcholine). A third group of eight SCID-HU-INT mice received similar inoculations with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Eight SCID-HU-INT mice were not challenged with amebas and served as uninfected controls. Twenty-four hours after antibody injections, the human colonic xenografts were challenged with 106 E. histolytica HM-1:IMSS trophozoites. After 24 h of infection, all mice received an intraluminal (human colonic xenograft) injection of 50 µl of fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled dextran (FITC-dextran), and 4 h later, the animals were sacrificed and sera were obtained for fluorescence measurement as previously described (8). The human colonic xenografts were sectioned, and segments were homogenized for interleukin 8 (IL-8), IL-1ß, and myeloperoxidase (MPO) assays, as previously described (8). Colonic segments were also fixed for histology and stained with hematoxylin and eosin as previously described (7).
Infection of human colonic xenografts with E. histolytica trophozoites results in marked tissue damage and inflammation, with invasion of amebas into mucosal and submucosal layers (7, 8, 10). Elevations in levels of the proinflammatory cytokine IL-1ß and the chemokine IL-8, as well as marked neutrophil influx into the infected human colonic xenograft, are consistent components of infection (8). These findings were reproduced in SCID-HU-INT mice receiving either PBS or the control monoclonal antibody 1B10. As shown in Fig. 1A, levels of IL-1ß were significantly higher in E. histolytica-infected human colonic xenografts obtained from SCID-HU-INT mice receiving 1B10 (P
0.05) or no antibody (P
0.05) than in those obtained from uninfected controls. In contrast, levels of IL-1ß were significantly lower in E. histolytica-infected human colonic xenografts from SCID-HU-INT mice passively immunized with EH5 than in animals treated with 1B10 (P
0.05) or PBS (P
0.05) (Fig. 1A) and were not significantly different from those seen in uninfected colonic xenografts (P = 0.4). IL-8 levels (Fig. 1B) were also significantly lower in E. histolytica-infected human colonic xenografts obtained from SCID-HU-INT mice passively immunized with EH5 than in those obtained from SCID-HU-INT mice treated with 1B10 (P
0.05) or PBS (P
0.05). However, levels of IL-8 in E. histolytica-infected human colonic xenografts from SCID-HU-INT mice passively immunized with EH5 were higher than those seen in uninfected human intestinal xenografts (P
0.05). MPO levels, a measure of neutrophil influx into the intestinal xenografts, were significantly lower in human colonic xenografts from SCID-HU-INT mice pretreated with EH5 than in E. histolytica-infected human colonic xenografts from SCID-HU-INT mice pretreated with PBS (P
0.05) or the control monoclonal antibody 1B10 (Fig. 1C). Levels of MPO in human colonic xenografts from EH5-pretreated SCID-HU-INT mice were not significantly different from those seen in uninfected human colonic xenografts (P = 0.3). Tissue damage caused by E. histolytica infection of human colonic xenografts results in a loss of the intestinal permeability barrier and can be quantified by measuring the flux of FITC-dextran from the lumen of the xenograft to the serum of the SCID-HU-INT mouse (8). We found significant differences in damage to E. histolytica-infected human colonic xenografts between SCID-HU-INT mice treated with EH5 and those receiving PBS or 1B10, with higher levels of FITC-dextran seen in the sera of the PBS (P
0.01)- or 1B10 (P
0.01)-treated SCID-HU-INT mice (Fig. 1D). Pretreatment with EH5 did not provide complete protection against damage to the intestinal permeability barrier, as levels of FITC-dextran were significantly higher in E. histolytica-infected, EH5-treated SCID-HU-INT mice than in uninfected SCID-HU-INT mice (P
0.05).
![]() View larger version (39K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Effect of passive immunization of SCID-HU-INT mice with monoclonal antibody EH5 on inflammation and tissue damage in human colonic xenografts infected with E. histolytica. Values are the means of results for eight animals ± the standard deviation for E. histolytica-infected human colonic xenografts from SCID-HU-INT mice passively immunized with monoclonal antibody EH5, 1B10, PBS (No ab), or uninfected human colonic xenografts. (A) Levels of IL-1ß, expressed as picograms of IL-1ß per milligram of total protein; (B) levels of IL-8, expressed as picograms of IL-8 per microgram of total protein; (C) levels of MPO, expressed as units of MPO per milligram of total protein; and (D) levels of FITC in serum, expressed as nanograms of FITC per milliliter of serum per millimeter squared of tissue. All levels measured (A to D) were significantly lower in E. histolytica-infected human colonic xenografts from SCID-HU-INT mice treated with EH5 than in E. histolytica-infected colonic xenografts from SCID-HU-INT mice treated with the control monoclonal antibody 1B10 or with no antibody.
|
![]() View larger version (93K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Morphologic findings in E. histolytica-infected human colonic xenografts from SCID-HU-INT mice. Photomicrographs of hematoxylin-and-eosin-stained sections of E. histolytica-infected human colonic xenografts from SCID-HU-INT mice treated with 1B10 (A) or EH5 (B and C) are shown. (A) Extensive mucosal destruction and inflammation and multiple E. histolytica trophozoites (white arrows) that have invaded the mucosa and submucosal tissues are visible in a section from a 1B10-treated SCID-HU-INT mouse. (B) In an E. histolytica-infected human colonic xenograft from an EH5-treated SCID-HU-INT mouse, amebic trophozoites are clumped together in the lumen but the mucosa remains intact and no signs of invasion arevisible. (C) In a section from a different EH-5-treated SCID-HU-INT mouse, mucosal destruction and inflammation are present and amebic trophozoites can be seen invading the mucosa and submucosal regions. Magnification, x176 (all panels).
|
In our study, antibodies were administered i.p., as well as directly into the lumen of the human colonic xenograft, in order to maximize gut antibody levels. It is possible that i.p. administration alone, or direct intraluminal administration of EH5 alone, would have been protective, and work is in progress to address this possibility. Antibodies to EH5 did not completely protect all passively immunized SCID-HU-INT mice in this study, and this was apparent from both the analyses of IL-8 and FITC levels and the histological analysis. Where disease was detected, pathologic findings were identical to those seen in E. histolytica-infected human colonic xenografts from control SCID-HU-INT mice. There was a correlation between histological findings of tissue damage and higher FITC levels in the three EH5-treated mice with invasive disease (mean, 2.6 ng of FITC/ml of serum/mm2 of tissue [±7]) and those in the five EH5-treated SCID-HU-INT mice without signs of disease (mean, 1.32 ng/ml/mm2 ± 0.6; P
0.05), but differences in cytokine or MPO levels between these groups did not reach statistical significance (data not shown). The differences in efficacy among EH5-treated SCID-HU-INT mice were not secondary to differences in antibody levels, as murine immunoglobulin G levels (representing EH5 in these SCID mice) in the human intestinal xenografts were similar in all EH5-treated mice (data not shown).
The mechanisms by which EH5 provided protection in this setting are not clearly established, but previous studies have shown that antibodies to the amebic LPGs-PPGs can block amebic adherence to target cells (9). Consistent with the idea that effector functions of antibodies may not be necessary for protection in this setting, we have found that Fab fragments of EH5 appear to be as effective as the intact antibody in preventing disease (Z. Zhang and S.L. Stanley, Jr., unpublished data). Because these studies used SCID-HU-INT mice to investigate human colonic disease in vivo, it remains to be established whether active immunization with the amebic LPGs-PPGs can engender protective immunity against amebic colitis.
This work was supported by NIH grant AI30084 (to S.L.S.), NIH grant DK52574 for the Washington University Digestive Diseases Research Core Center, and NIH grant HD00836 to the Birth Defects Research Laboratory at the University of Washington, Seattle. S.L. Stanley, Jr., is a Burroughs Wellcome Scholar in Molecular Parasitology.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»