Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, December 2002, p. 7172-7175, Vol. 70, No. 12
0019-9567/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/IAI.70.12.7172-7175.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste,1 International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, 34012 Trieste, Italy2
Received 27 June 2002/ Returned for modification 7 August 2002/ Accepted 11 September 2002
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although we are far from having a complete picture of the Leptospira pathogenic factors, it is clear that these organisms are invasive and that the success of their invasions is mainly due to their ability to survive and grow in tissues by escaping natural defense mechanisms such as phagocytic cells, the complement system, and pharmacologically active tissue peptides and mediators. In fact, pathogenic leptospires can survive in the nonimmune host by evading complement-mediated killing (6) and (probably) phagocytosis. Studies have shown that pathogenic leptospires bind nonopsonically to and are slowly internalized by guinea pig macrophages and human polymorphonuclear leucocytes (1, 5-7, 20). Although nonpathogenic spirochetes are rapidly engulfed and killed by human polymorphonuclear phagocytes, there is no clear evidence of the killing of pathogenic spirochetes other than that mediated by specific antibodies directed against some of their surface components (5). Moreover, live pathogenic leptospires can partially escape uptake by Kupffer cells from perfused rat liver (16). Overall, these data indicate that survival of leptospires is due primarily to scarce uptake by phagocytes. However, whether those leptospires that have been engulfed through nonopsonic phagocytosis are susceptible to intracellular killing is not known.
The bactericidal systems activated after uptake by phagocytes include the generation of oxygen metabolites (O2-dependent killing) and the release of granule components such as proteins and peptides with microbicidal activity (10, 15) into the phagocytic vacuole (O2-independent killing) and combinations of the two. Since it is not known which among the killing mechanisms of phagocytes are effective toward leptospires, we have investigated the in vitro sensitivity of pathogenic and nonpathogenic strains of leptospires to the O2-dependent and -independent killing machinery of neutrophils.
The oxygen-dependent chlorinating system constitutes an important microbicidal strategy employed by neutrophils (13), and we tested its efficacy with respect to leptospires by means of a myeloperoxidase (MPO)-H2O2-Cl- cell-free assay. As previously reported, the complete chlorinating system kills Escherichia coli K-12 (strain AB 1157) very efficiently (reference 11 and data not shown) whereas neither MPO nor H2O2 is effective on its own. However, we found a pronounced killing effect with H2O2 on both the pathogenic Leptospira interrogans strain Hardjoprajitno (serovar hardjo) and the nonpathogenic Leptospira biflexa strain Patoc1 (serovar patoc), regardless of the presence of MPO (Table 1). Both saprophytic and pathogenic leptospires were very sensitive to 0.33 mM H2O2 in the presence or absence of MPO, with the decrease of viable leptospires being at least 2 logarithms. The leptospiracidal activity of H2O2 alone was confirmed by using other pathogenic strains such as 142 (serovar icterohaemorrhagiae), Wijmberg (serovar copenhageni), and Ballico (serovar australis), with the microorganism survival level being at least 2 logarithms lower than that of the controls. We then tested the effect of lower H2O2 concentrations on the Hardjoprajitno and Patoc1 strains, starting with 0.0018 mM (Fig. 1). The dose response curves showed that nonpathogenic Patoc1 was more sensitive than Hardjoprajitno to H2O2, with the level of killing 1 order of magnitude higher at 0.03 mM and 3 orders of magnitude higher at 0.18 mM, which is the concentration at which complete killing was achieved for Patoc1. The apparent absence of a contribution of MPO to the level of killing could have been due to too high a concentration of H2O2, to which these leptospires are particularly sensitive. Therefore, we investigated the possible contribution of MPO (0.1 guaiacol unit [1 guaiacol unit is the amount of enzyme which oxidizes 1 µmol of guaiacol per min]) to the level of killing at 0.033 mM H2O2, which is a concentration that results in only partial killing of the leptospires. As shown in Fig. 2, the presence of MPO did not increase the efficiency of H2O2-mediated killing after 10 or 30 min of incubation. As observed previously, Patoc1 was demonstrated to be the more susceptible of the two strains, with a decrease of viable leptospires on the order of 2 log against a decrease of 1 log for Hardjoprajitno. Altogether, leptospires were found to be sensitive to H2O2 independently of MPO, i.e., not as a consequence of halogenation reactions. This H2O2 sensitivity can be postulated to be due to a scarce or absent production of catalase. In fact, no catalase activity has been detected in strain Patoc1, and strain Hardjoprajitno hydrolyzes only 16 µmol of H2O2 per min per 109 cells (2). This is likely to be the reason that leptospires show a higher susceptibility to H2O2 toxicity than other bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus (21), Legionella pneumophila (12), Listeria monocytogenes (4), and E. coli (19). That H2O2 is less reactive than other products of oxygen metabolism such as O2-, OH, and hypohalous acid allows it to pass intact through cell membranes (8), diffuse within biological fluids containing little or no catalase, and act as an oxidizing agent (18). The lack of a role for MPO in the killing of both pathogenic and nonpathogenic leptospires is in keeping with results previously obtained with Borrelia species (11). We have demonstrated here that MPO is not only not bactericidal but it is also unable to increase the microbicidal action of H2O2. MPO is a cationic protein and, as such, is generally thought to adhere to cell surfaces and result in cell injury (in the presence of H2O2) by increasing the local concentration of hypohalous acid at the target membrane (13). Therefore, it can be speculated that in the case of spirochetes in particular, MPO is not able to bind to the outer membranes and therefore chlorination reactions cannot take place. According to this hypothesis, the lack of such reactions excludes the possibility that the halogenation of Leptospira membrane proteins is the cause of functional damage leading to the killing of spirochetes.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Oxygen-dependent killing of leptospiresa
|
![]() View larger version (12K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Dose response of H2O2 leptospiracidal activity. Leptospires (105) were incubated at 37°C for 30 min with different concentrations of H2O2 in a final volume of 100 µl of minimal essential medium (MEM). Bactericidal activity was evaluated as described in Table 1, footnote a. Values are the means of two representative experiments.
|
![]() View larger version (17K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Bactericidal effect of H2O2-MPO-Cl- on nonpathogenic and pathogenic leptospires. Leptospira strain Patoc1 (nonpathogenic) or Hardjoprajitno (pathogenic) was incubated at 37°C in the presence of 0.033 mM H2O2, with or without 0.1 guaiacol unit of MPO, in minimal essential medium. At different incubation times of up to 30 min, microbicidal activities were evaluated as described in Table 1; footnote a. Data shown are means ± standard deviations (n = 3).
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Oxygen-independent killing of leptospiresa
|
![]() View larger version (23K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Dose dependency of the microbicidal activity of primary or secondary neutrophil granule extracts toward leptospires. Nonpathogenic (Patoc1) and pathogenic (Hardjoprajitno) strains of leptospires were incubated at 37°C for 30 min in the presence of different amounts of granule extracts. Controls were incubated for 30 min with the same amount of acetate buffer (pH 4.2) as that present in the granule extracts. Microbicidal activities were evaluated as described in Table 1, footnote a and are expressed as means ± standard deviations (n = 3).
|
![]() View larger version (49K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Leptospira killing by neutrophil primary granule components. (A) SDS-14% PAGE and sequential Coomassie and silver nitrate staining of Sephadex G-75 fractions showing microbicidal activity. No bands were detected above 31 kDa. (B) Killing activity of the fractions whose SDS-PAGE profiles are shown in panel A, determined as described in Table 1, footnote a. A decrease of at least 1 log in the number of surviving bacteria is referred to as relative activity 1. No microbicidal effect was found before fraction 25 or after fraction 32.
|
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»