Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, April 2002, p. 2171-2177, Vol. 70, No. 4
0019-9567/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/IAI.70.4.2171-2177.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
ID Biomedical Corporation, Bothell, Washington,1 Respiratory Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia,2 Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Department of Medicine, University of Tennessee, Memphis, Tennessee3
Received 12 November 2001/ Returned for modification 19 December 2001/ Accepted 18 January 2002
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Previous studies have shown that the surface M protein is the major virulence determinant and the major protective antigen of group A streptococci (29). The type specificity of each M protein, of which more than 100 are now known, is largely determined by the epitopes located in the amino-terminal 40 to 50 amino acid residues (3, 8, 14, 27). These regions of M proteins have been shown to evoke antibodies with the greatest bactericidal (protective) activity and are least likely to cross-react with human tissues (2, 14, 20). Thus, our approach has been to combine small amino-terminal M protein peptides to make multivalent vaccines that would elicit opsonic antibodies against epidemiologically important serotypes of group A streptococci (12, 21).
In the present study, we constructed a 26-valent M protein-based vaccine by recombinant technology. The vaccine is composed of four different fusion proteins that contain six or seven M protein fragments linked in tandem. Each component protein of the vaccine was designed to serve as its own carrier, thus obviating the need for unrelated proteins. When formulated with alum, the vaccine was highly immunogenic in rabbits and evoked broadly protective antibodies, as determined by opsonization and indirect bactericidal activity assays. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of using highly complex, multivalent M protein-based group A streptococcal vaccines to evoke broadly protective antibodies.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Criteria for selection of M peptides. The amino acid sequences of the M proteins selected for inclusion in the vaccine were obtained from the CDC emm typing center website (www.cdc.gov/ncidod/biotech/strep/emmtypes.html). The amino-terminal regions of the mature M proteins (and Spa) were searched by BlastP for homology against human proteins in the GenBank database. Amino-terminal regions having five or more contiguous amino acid matches with human proteins were excluded. The selected regions of the M peptides and Spa were then analyzed by the method of Hopp and Woods (24) to ensure the integrity of hydrophilic peaks.
Construction and expression of hexavalent and septavalent vaccine proteins. Once the specific 5' sequences of each emm gene and the spa gene had been selected for inclusion in the vaccine, they were used to design four hybrid DNA molecules, each containing six or seven emm gene fragments linked in tandem by unique restriction enzyme sites (Fig. 1). Each protein sequence encoded by the hybrid DNA molecules was again analyzed by BlastP to ensure that there were no significant homologies with human proteins. Restriction enzyme sites were selected to avoid potential cross-reactive epitopes.
|
Construction and expression of individual recombinant dimeric M peptides. Individual recombinant dimeric peptides comprising the vaccine component peptides were expressed and purified for use as serologic reagents in these studies. Each emm gene fragment included in the hybrid DNA molecules described above was independently amplified by PCR, purified, and cloned sequentially into pT5 as an in-frame dimer with a restriction enzyme site in the middle. Each sequence was verified by sequencing both strands of the dimeric DNA molecules. Expression of each peptide in transformed E. coli JM105 was detected by SDS-PAGE analysis as described above.
Purification of recombinant multivalent vaccine component fusion proteins. Each component fusion protein was purified separately. Cell paste of E. coli JM105 expressing recombinant His-tagged protein was lysed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) by Microfluidation (Microfluidics, Inc., Newton, Mass.). After centrifugation, the clarified lysate was batch adsorbed to nickel-loaded affinity chelate resin (Tosoh Biosep, Montgomeryville, Pa.), washed, and eluted with a step gradient of imidazole in PBS. Fractions containing the eluted recombinant protein were pooled, pumped through a 5-ml HiTrap Q anion-exchange cartridge (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, N.J.), and concentrated in a stir cell (Millipore, Bedford, Mass.). The concentrated recombinant protein was further purified by size exclusion chromatography with a Superdex 200 column (600-cm length; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) equilibrated with PBS. Fraction purity was monitored by SDS-PAGE, and fractions containing pure recombinant protein were pooled and stored at -20°C until use. The purity, identity, and concentration of each fusion protein were further assessed by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography, amino acid analysis, and electrospray mass spectrometry.
Purification of individual recombinant dimeric M peptides. E. coli JM105 expressing recombinant His-tagged protein was lysed in PBS containing 8 M urea for 3 h with stirring. After centrifugation, the clarified lysate was batch adsorbed to nickel-loaded affinity chelate resin (Tosoh Biosep) and washed and eluted with a step gradient of imidazole in PBS. The eluted protein was then loaded onto a preparative reverse-phase C4 column (Vydac, Hesperia, Calif.), washed, and eluted with increasing concentrations of acetonitrile in water containing 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid. Fractions of eluted protein were monitored by SDS-PAGE. Fractions containing purified protein were pooled and dialyzed against PBS before storage at -20°C.
Vaccine formulation and immunization of rabbits. The four vaccine polypeptides A.1, B.2, C.2, and D.1 were mixed in equimolar amounts and adsorbed to alum (Rehydragel, low viscosity; Reheis, Inc., Berkeley Heights, N.J.) to achieve a final protein concentration of 800 µg/ml and a final alum concentration of 1.5 mg/ml in PBS. New Zealand White rabbits were each immunized with 400 µg of the vaccine via the intramuscular route at either 0, 4, and 8 weeks or 0, 4, and 16 weeks (12). Serum was obtained prior to the first injection and 2 weeks after the final injection.
Detection of type-specific antibodies. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) were performed with preimmune and immune rabbit sera by methods previously described (33). The purified recombinant dimeric M peptides comprising the vaccine subunits were used as solid-phase antigens.
Opsonization assays and indirect bactericidal tests. Opsonic antibodies were detected by in vitro opsonization assays as previously described (6). The test mixture consisted of 0.05 ml of a standard suspension of streptococci grown to mid-log phase, 0.05 ml of test serum, and 0.2 ml of whole, heparinized (10 U/ml), nonimmune human blood. For these assays, the number of streptococcal CFU per leukocyte was approximately 10. The tubes were rotated end over end for 45 min at 37°C. Smears were then made on glass slides and stained with Wright's stain (Sigma Diagnostics, St. Louis, Mo.). Opsonization was quantitated by counting 50 consecutive neutrophils and calculating the percentage with associated streptococci (percent opsonization).
Bactericidal assays were performed similarly (30), except that 0.05 ml of Todd-Hewitt broth containing fewer bacteria was added to 0.1 ml of test serum and 0.35 ml of blood and the mixture was rotated for 3 h at 37°C. Then, 0.1-ml aliquots of this mixture were added to melted sheep blood agar, pour plates were prepared, and viable organisms (CFU) were counted after overnight incubation at 37°C. For each serotype tested, three different inocula were used to ensure that the growth in blood containing preimmune serum was optimal and quantifiable. The results were expressed as percent killing, which was calculated by using the following formula: {[(CFU after 3 h of growth with preimmune serum) - (CFU after 3 h of growth with immune serum)] ÷ CFU after 3 h of growth with preimmune serum} x 100. Only those assays that resulted in growth of the test strain for at least eight generations in the presence of preimmune serum were used to express percent killing in the presence of immune serum.
Assays for tissue-cross-reactive antibodies. Immune sera were tested for the presence of tissue-cross-reactive antibodies by indirect immunofluorescence assays using frozen sections of human heart, brain, kidney, and cartilage by methods previously described (15).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The vaccine was also designed to contain protective M peptides from serotypes of group A streptococci that have been epidemiologically linked to ARF (9). Some of these serotypes have recently been associated with ARF, such as types 18 (38, 39) and 5 (25), while others, such as types 19 and 24, are rarely encountered today but have historically been characterized as rheumatogenic strains (9).
Immunogenicity of the 26-valent vaccine in rabbits. The component fusion proteins of the vaccine (Fig. 1) were purified separately, mixed together in equimolar concentrations, and formulated with alum to contain 400 µg of protein and 750 µg of alum in each 0.5-ml dose. Initial experiments were performed to determine the immunogenicity of the vaccine in groups of three rabbits that each received three intramuscular injections of the vaccine at either 0, 4, and 8 weeks or 0, 4, and 16 weeks. ELISAs were performed with preimmune sera and immune sera (obtained 2 weeks after the final injection) against the purified recombinant dimeric peptide components of the vaccine. The immune sera from rabbits immunized at 0, 4, and 16 weeks contained high titers of antibodies against the majority of the M peptides contained in the vaccine (Fig. 3). Antibody titers were determined for each of the 26 M peptides and Spa, a new protective antigen of group A streptococci (19). All preimmune titers were less than 200. Of the 81 immune serum titers determined (27 antigens times three rabbits), 69 (85%) showed fourfold or greater increases over the preimmune levels (Fig. 3). By the same criteria, the sera obtained from the rabbits immunized at 0, 4, and 8 weeks showed that 67 (83%) of the 81 immune titers showed fourfold or greater increases over preimmune levels (data not shown). Because there was no significant difference in the results obtained with the two immunization schedules, we chose to perform a detailed analysis of the immune sera from rabbits immunized at 0, 4, and 16 weeks.
|
10% opsonization of each of the 26 serotypes tested (data not shown), indicating that the donor blood used for these assays did not contain antibodies against the test organism and that each organism was fully resistant to opsonization in nonimmune blood. When 30% opsonization in the presence of immune serum (or three or more times the preimmune level) was used as a positive threshold result, 18 (69%) of the 26 serotypes were opsonized by at least one of three immune rabbit sera (Fig. 4).
|
|
Assays for tissue-cross-reactive antibodies evoked by the 26-valent vaccine. To detect tissue-cross-reactive antibodies, indirect immunofluorescence assays were performed with all six immune rabbit sera and frozen sections of human heart, kidney, brain, or cartilage (15). None of the immune sera contained antibodies that cross-reacted with any of the human tissues tested, indicating that the vaccine did not contain potentially harmful autoimmune epitopes.
Bactericidal activity of the 26-valent antisera against type 4 streptococci. Type 4 streptococci are relatively common causes of uncomplicated pharyngitis and invasive infections. To our knowledge, a protective antigen has not been identified on the surface of this serotype. Purified recombinant type 4 M protein does not evoke opsonic antibodies (unpublished data). For this reason, an emm4 gene fragment was not included in the 26-valent vaccine. To determine whether any of the antibodies evoked by the 26-valent vaccine might be directed against cross-reactive opsonic epitopes on the surface of type 4 streptococci, we performed bactericidal activity assays with seven clinical isolates obtained from the ongoing U.S. Streptococcal Pharyngitis Surveillance Program (Fig. 6). Interestingly, bactericidal activity against five of the seven strains of type 4 streptococci was detected. The strains isolated from patients in Florida (FL9) and Illinois (IL23 and IL12) were opsonized by both of the 26-valent antisera tested. The two isolates from California (CA8 and CA12) were opsonized by one antiserum but not the other, and the strains from Connecticut (CT5) and South Dakota (SD32) were not opsonized by either antiserum (Fig. 6). The results suggest that the 26-valent vaccine may evoke antibodies that cross-react with protective epitopes on the surface of some strains of type 4 streptococci. In addition, the data indicate that type 4 streptococci may be a heterogeneous group of organisms that express different protective epitopes even though they all contain the type-specific emm4 gene.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The selection of M protein serotypes for inclusion in the expanded-valency vaccine was based on current epidemiologic studies of invasive disease and uncomplicated pharyngitis and historical information linking certain serotypes to the pathogenesis of ARF (9, 25, 38). The overall goal is to develop a vaccine that will have a significant impact on the total disease burden caused by group A streptococci in North America and western Europe. There is considerable overlap between the serotypes that cause invasive disease and those that are prevalent in a population and cause uncomplicated infections (25). Thus, approximately 80% of the serotypes identified in current epidemiologic studies are included in the 26-valent vaccine. In addition, certain serotypes, such as M19 and M24, that have historically been identified as rheumatogenic (9) are also included even though they are not present in the population today. This decision was based on the assumption that new serotypes could emerge under the immunologic pressure of a multivalent vaccine. If so, it would be desirable that the emerging serotypes have little or no rheumatogenic potential. Thus, the selection of serotypes was based on current data and a historical perspective that took into consideration projections about future epidemiologic trends that may occur under the influence of vaccine pressure.
In the present study, rabbits were immunized with three doses of 400 µg of the 26-valent vaccine. The vaccine contained a total of 31 peptides comprising 26 different M peptides, 1 Spa peptide, and 4 C-terminal peptides that were copies of the N-terminal components. Thus, each 400-µg dose contained the equivalent of approximately 12.9 µg of each component peptide. Based on weight, this is comparable to the adult formulation of recombinant hepatitis B vaccine, which contains up to 20 µg of protein per dose, or the acellular pertussis vaccine, which contains up to 25 µg of purified pertussis toxin per dose. Peptides included in the 26-valent vaccine represent only minimal fragments of M proteins that elicit opsonic antibodies. This approach, together with the fact that each component fusion protein serves as its own carrier, enhances the possibility that the majority of the antibodies elicited will be functionally active.
The immunogenicity of the 26-valent vaccine was assessed by ELISA, opsonization assays, and bactericidal activity tests. The ELISA was performed with individual recombinant M protein and Spa protein fragments included in the component fusion proteins of the vaccine. At least one of the three immunized rabbits developed significant levels of antibodies (a fourfold or greater titer increase) against 25 of the 26 type-specific antigens. Opsonization and indirect bactericidal activity assays were performed to determine the functional activity of the antisera by using each of the 26 different serotypes of group A streptococci. For the most part, there was a very good correlation among the results of all three assays. There was a direct correlation between the results of opsonization and bactericidal activity assays with 20 of the 26 serotypes tested. Interestingly, the majority of the serotypes that yielded inconsistent results were serum opacity factor-positive strains. For example, type 114 was strongly opsonized by all three immune rabbit sera yet the same sera resulted in little or no bactericidal activity. Conversely, type 75 streptococci were not opsonized by any of the three sera yet two of the antisera were strongly bactericidal against this serotype. The reasons for the occasional inconsistencies between the two assays is not clear, but we concluded that an overall assessment of the potential efficacy of M protein-based vaccines should be based on the results of both assays performed with the same immune sera.
The predicted potential efficacy of the 26-valent vaccine, as determined by the M types included in the vaccine and their frequency in the population, is reduced by the fact that a protective antigen of type 4 streptococci is not part of this construct. Type 4 organisms currently account for 3.7% of all invasive infections (Fig. 2) and 9.5% of all pharyngitis isolates in the ongoing U.S. surveillance program (B. Beall, personal communication). Studies are currently ongoing in our laboratories to identify the protective antigen(s) on the surface of type 4 streptococci. Of considerable interest was our finding that the 26-valent rabbit antisera showed bactericidal activity against some strains of type 4 streptococci. Cross-opsonic antibodies have recently been demonstrated in animals immunized with amino-terminal peptides of M proteins from strains of group A streptococci isolated from patients in the Northern Territory of Australia (10). A 20-amino-acid peptide from the amino terminus of one serotype of M protein evoked antibodies that opsonized a heterologous serotype. The cross-opsonic antibodies did not cross-react with the amino-terminal peptide of the heterologous M protein, indicating that the cross-opsonic antibodies may recognize epitopes in other regions of M or M-like proteins (10). In the present study, it is also possible that some of the antibodies evoked by amino-terminal peptides of M proteins cross-reacted with opsonic epitopes on serotypes not represented in the vaccine. Studies are currently in progress to determine the nonvaccine types that may be cross-opsonized and the vaccine peptides that may evoke cross-reactive antibodies. We are also conducting experiments to identify the serotypes that express Spa. If Spa is broadly distributed among multiple serotypes of group A streptococci, this may also enhance the cross-protective efficacy of the 26-valent vaccine. Results of these studies should provide a better understanding of the number of serotypes of group A streptococci that may be opsonized by antisera against the 26-valent vaccine.
In summary, we have shown that a highly complex 26-valent M protein-based vaccine is immunogenic in rabbits and evokes broadly opsonic antibodies against the majority of vaccine types. The vaccine was free of tissue-cross-reactive epitopes, as determined by indirect immunofluorescence assays. We believe that this vaccine has the potential to induce broadly protective antibody responses in humans that could have a significant impact on the overall disease burden caused by group A streptococci.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We appreciate the expert technical assistance provided by Edna Chiang and Valerie Long and the expert secretarial assistance of Deborah Bueltemann in preparing the manuscript. We also appreciate the assistance of the members of the Active Bacterial Core Surveillance Program, part of the CDC Emerging Infections Program Network, specifically, Carolyn Wright for providing the calculations for the 1998 to 2000 surveillance data.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Baird, R. W., M. S. Bronze, W. Kraus, H. R. Hill, L. G. Veasey, and J. B. Dale. 1991. Epitopes of group A streptococcal M protein shared with antigens of articular cartilage and synovium. J. Immunol. 146:3132-3137.[Abstract] |
| 2. | Beachey, E. H., and J. M. Seyer. 1986. Protective and nonprotective epitopes of chemically synthesized peptides of the NH2-terminal region of type 6 streptococcal M protein. J. Immunol. 136:2287-2292.[Abstract] |
| 3. | Beachey, E. H., J. M. Seyer, and J. B. Dale. 1981. Type-specific protective immunity evoked by synthetic peptide of Streptococcus pyogenes M protein. Nature (London) 292:457-459.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 4. | Beachey, E. H., J. M. Seyer, J. B. Dale, and D. L. Hasty. 1983. Repeating covalent structure and protective immunogenicity of native and synthetic polypeptide fragments of type 24 streptococcal M protein. J. Biol. Chem. 258:13250-13257. |
| 5. | Beachey, E. H., J. M. Seyer, and A. H. Kang. 1980. Primary structure of protective antigens of type 24 streptococcal M protein. J. Biol. Chem. 255:6284-6289. |
| 6. | Beachey, E. H., G. H. Stollerman, E. Y. Chiang, T. M. Chiang, J. M. Seyer, and A. H. Kang. 1977. Purification and properties of M protein extracted from group A streptococci with pepsin: covalent structure of the amino terminal region of the type 24 M antigen. J. Exp. Med. 145:1469-1483. |
| 7. | Beall, B., R. Facklam, T. Hoenes, and B. Schwartz. 1997. Survey of emm gene sequences and T-antigen types from systemic Streptococcus pyogenes infection isolates collected in San Francisco, California; Atlanta, Georgia; and Connecticut in 1994 and 1995. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:1231-1235.[Abstract] |
| 8. | Beall, B., R. Facklam, and T. Thompson. 1995. Sequencing emm-specific polymerase chain reaction products for routine and accurate typing of group A streptococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:953-958.[Abstract] |
| 9. | Bisno, A. L. 1980. The concept of rheumatogenic and nonrheumatogenic group A streptococci, p. 789-803. In S. E. Reed and J. B. Zabriskie (ed.), Streptococcal diseases and the immune response. Academic Press, Inc., New York, N.Y. |
| 10. | Brandt, E. R., K. S. Sriprakash, R. I. Hobb, W. A. Hayman, W. Zeng, M. R. Batzloff, D. C. Jackson, and M. F. Good. 2000. New multi-determinant strategy for a group A streptococcal vaccine designed for the Australian Aboriginal population. Nat. Med. 6:455-459.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 11. | Cunningham, M. W. 2000. Pathogenesis of group A streptococcal infections. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 13:470-511. |
| 12. | Dale, J. B. 1999. Multivalent group A streptococcal vaccine designed to optimize the immunogenicity of six tandem M protein fragments. Vaccine 17:193-200.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 13. | Dale, J. B., and E. H. Beachey. 1985. Epitopes of streptococcal M proteins shared with cardiac myosin. J. Exp. Med. 162:583-591. |
| 14. | Dale, J. B., and E. H. Beachey. 1986. Localization of protective epitopes of the amino terminus of type 5 streptococcal M protein. J. Exp. Med. 163:1191-1202. |
| 15. | Dale, J. B., and E. H. Beachey. 1985. Multiple heart-cross-reactive epitopes of streptococcal M proteins. J. Exp. Med. 161:113-122. |
| 16. | Dale, J. B., and E. H. Beachey. 1986. Sequence of myosin-cross-reactive epitopes of streptococcal M protein. J. Exp. Med. 164:1785-1790. |
| 17. | Dale, J. B., and E. C. Chiang. 1995. Intranasal immunization with recombinant group A streptococcal M protein fragment fused to the B subunit of Escherichia coli labile toxin protects mice against systemic challenge infections. J. Infect. Dis. 171:1038-1041.[Medline] |
| 18. | Dale, J. B., E. Y. Chiang, and J. W. Lederer. 1993. Recombinant tetravalent group A streptococcal M protein vaccine. J. Immunol. 151:2188-2194.[Abstract] |
| 19. | Dale, J. B., E. Y. Chiang, S. Y. Liu, H. S. Courtney, and D. L. Hasty. 1999. New protective antigen of group A streptococci. J. Clin. Investig. 103:1261-1268.[Medline] |
| 20. | Dale, J. B., J. M. Seyer, and E. H. Beachey. 1983. Type-specific immunogenicity of a chemically synthesized peptide fragment of type 5 streptococcal M protein. J. Exp. Med. 158:1727-1732. |
| 21. | Dale, J. B., M. Simmons, E. C. Chiang, and E. Y. Chiang. 1996. Recombinant, octavalent group A streptococcal M protein vaccine. Vaccine 14:944-948.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 22. | Dochez, A. R., O. T. Avery, and R. C. Lancefield. 1919. Studies on the biology of Streptococcus. J. Exp. Med. 30:179-213.[Abstract] |
| 23. | Fischetti, V. A., K. F. Jones, B. N. Manjula, and J. R. Scott. 1984. Streptococcal M6 protein expressed in Escherichia coli. Localization, purification and comparison with streptococcal-derived M protein. J. Exp. Med. 159:1083-1095. |
| 24. | Hopp, T. P., and K. R. Woods. 1983. A computer program for predicting protein antigenic determinants. Mol. Immunol. 20:483-489.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 25. | Johnson, D. R., D. L. Stevens, and E. L. Kaplan. 1992. Epidemiologic analysis of group A streptococcal serotypes associated with severe systemic infections, rheumatic fever, or uncomplicated pharyngitis. J. Infect. Dis. 166:374-382.[Medline] |
| 26. | Jones, K. F., and V. A. Fischetti. 1988. The importance of the location of antibody binding on the M6 protein for opsonization and phagocytosis of group A M6 streptococci. J. Exp. Med. 167:1114-1123. |
| 27. | Jones, K. F., B. N. Manjula, K. H. Johnston, S. K. Hollingshead, J. R. Scott, and V. A. Fischetti. 1985. Location of variable and conserved epitopes among the multiple serotypes of streptococcal M protein. J. Exp. Med. 161:623-628. |
| 28. | Lancefield, R. C. 1928. The antigenic complex of Streptococcus haemolyticus. 1. Demonstration of type-specific substance in extracts of Streptococcus haemolyticus. J. Exp. Med. 47:91-103. |
| 29. | Lancefield, R. C. 1962. Current knowledge of the type specific M antigens of group A streptococci. J. Immunol. 89:307-313. |
| 30. | Lancefield, R. C. 1957. Differentiation of group A streptococci with a common R antigen into three serologic types with special reference to the bactericidal test. J. Exp Med. 106:525-544.[Abstract] |
| 31. | Lancefield, R. C. 1959. Persistence of type-specific antibodies in man following infection with group A streptococci. J. Exp. Med. 110:271-292.[Abstract] |
| 32. | Manjula, B. N., A. Seetharma-Acharya, S. M. Mische, T. Fairwell, and V. A. Fischetti. 1984. The complete amino acid sequence of a biologically active 197-residue fragment of M protein isolated from type 5 group A streptococci. J. Biol. Chem. 259:3686-3693. |
| 33. | McLellan, D. G., E. Y. Chiang, H. S. Courtney, D. L. Hasty, S. C. Wei, M. C. Hu, M. A. Walls, J. J. Bloom, and J. B. Dale. 2001. Spa contributes to the virulence of type 18 group A streptococci. Infect. Immun. 69:2943-2949. |
| 34. | Miller, L., L. Gray, E. H. Beachey, and M. Kehoe. 1988. Antigenic variation among group A streptococcal M proteins: nucleotide sequence of the serotype 5 M protein gene and its relationship with genes encoding type 1, 6 and 24 M proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 263:5668-5673. |
| 35. | Sargent, S. J., E. H. Beachey, C. E. Corbett, and J. B. Dale. 1987. Sequence of protective epitopes of streptococcal M proteins shared with cardiac sarcolemmal membranes. J. Immunol. 139:1285-1290.[Abstract] |
| 36. | Schuchat, A., T. Hilger, E. Zell, M. M. Farley, A. Reingold, L. Harrison, L. Lefkowitz, R. Danila, K. Stefonek, N. Barrett, D. Morse, and R. Pinner. 2001. Active bacterial core surveillance of the emerging infections program network. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 7:92-99.[Medline] |
| 37. | Stevens, D. L. 1999. The flesh-eating bacterium: what's next? J. Infect. Dis. 179:366-374. |
| 38. | Stollerman, G. H. 1997. Rheumatic fever. Lancet 349:935-942.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 39. | Veasey, L. G., L. Y. Tani, and H. R. Hill. 1994. Persistence of acute rheumatic fever in the intermountain area of the United States. J. Pediatr. 124:9-16.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 40. | World Health Organization. 1986. Community prevention and control of cardiovascular diseases. Report of a W. H. O. expert committee, p. 732. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| J. Bacteriol. | J. Virol. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|
| Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. | Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | All ASM Journals |
|---|