Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, May 2002, p. 2605-2613, Vol. 70, No. 5
0019-9567/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/IAI.70.5.2605-2613.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Departments of Pharmacology,1 Microbiology, Chicago College of Osteopathic Medicine, Midwestern University, Downers Grove, Illinois 605152
Received 4 October 2001/ Returned for modification 8 November 2001/ Accepted 29 January 2002
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Despite extensive research efforts, the exact mechanisms by which C. trachomatis causes derangements of host cell physiology remain poorly understood. During the course of studies to address this problem, we observed that infection of primary cultures of human cervical epithelial cells with C. trachomatis caused the cells to separate from each other without detaching from their growing surface. This suggested to us that C. trachomatis might somehow affect one or more of the molecular elements that maintain epithelial cell-cell adhesion.
One of the most important molecular determinants of epithelial cell-cell adhesion is the cadherin/catenin complex. The cadherins represent a diverse family of Ca2+-dependent cell adhesion molecules (for reviews, see references 23, 42, 51, and 56). Thus far, over 40 cadherins have been described, with the best characterized being the classical cadherins, such as E-, P-, and N-cadherin. These classical cadherins are integral Ca2+-binding glycoproteins that are usually localized at the adhering junctional complexes in epithelial cells (12, 16, 61). The cadherins are transmembrane proteins that contain an extracellular domain, a transmembrane domain, and an intracellular domain. The extracellular domain contains the Ca2+-binding sites, as well as the adhesive regions of the molecule. The binding of extracellular Ca2+ causes the molecule to assume a more rigid conformation and orients the adhesive regions so that the cadherin from one cell can interact, in a homologous manner, with a similar cadherin from an adjacent cell (1, 4, 40, 47, 48, 54). The intracellular domain of the cadherin is linked to ß-catenin, which is also bound to
-catenin, which in turn links the entire complex to the actin cytoskeleton (2, 27, 36, 41, 43, 44, 52). In this context, the cadherin/catenin complex serves as a key structural component of adherens-type junctions
In addition to our observation that infection with C. trachomatis causes cervical epithelial cells to separate from each other, several other lines of evidence suggest that C. trachomatis might affect the cadherin/catenin complex. Majeed et al. (32-34) have shown that the infection of epithelial cells with C. trachomatis and the translocation of the bacterium within the cells involves Ca2+ ions and a reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton, both of which could directly or indirectly affect the cadherin/catenin complex. Moreover, while there is no direct information regarding the effects of chlamydiae on the cadherin/catenin complex, a large number of recent studies have shown that other bacterial pathogens, including various species of Listeria, Salmonella, Shigella, and Helicobacter, can interact with the cadherins, the catenins, or their associated proteins and that this mechanism may play a critical role in microbial infection and subsequent changes in cell physiology (28, 30, 31, 37, 39, 53, 57, 58). In light of these observations, we felt that it would be interesting to examine the effects of C. trachomatis on the integrity of the cadherin/catenin complex and the localization of ß-catenin in human cervical epithelial cells.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Fluorescence microscopy. Preliminary immunofluorescence studies employing a panel of antibodies that specifically recognize either E-, P-, or N-cadherin, as well as a broad-spectrum pancadherin antibody, indicated that the primary cadherin that was expressed in both the primary cultures of the cervical epithelial cells and the HeLa cells was N-cadherin. For the present studies, N-cadherin was visualized by indirect immunofluorescence using the following procedure. Cells on glass coverslips were infected with C. trachomatis as described above. After 24 h, the samples were fixed in methanol at -20°C for 10 min. They were then incubated in 3% goat serum for 15 min (primary blocking serum). The samples were then incubated for 40 min with the primary antibody, a mouse anti-human N-cadherin (Transduction Labs, Lexington, Ky.), washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and incubated for 40 min in the secondary antibody, a fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (IgG; Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.). The samples were washed in deionized water, mounted on glass slides in Aqua Polymount (Polysciences Inc., Warrington, Pa.), and viewed with a fluorescence microscope. ß-Catenin and Chlamydia inclusions were visualized by indirect immunofluorescence using a dual-labeling procedure. Samples were fixed and permeabilized in -20°C methanol for 10 min and then blocked with 10% goat serum in PBS for 10 min. The samples were then incubated for 45 min at 37°C in PBS containing the primary antibodies, a polyclonal rabbit anti ß-catenin (Zymed Laboratories, South San Francisco, Calif.) at 10 µg/ml and a mouse anti-Chlamydia genus-specific monoclonal antibody (14 M-3-B9) that recognizes a genus-specific epitope of the chlamydial lipopolysaccharide at a 1:300 dilution (18). To assess background labeling, some samples were incubated in the same manner except that the primary antibodies were omitted from the solution. The samples were rinsed quickly in PBS and then incubated for 30 min at 37°C in PBS containing the secondary antibodies, a tetramethyl rhodamine isothiocyanate (TRITC)-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Sigma) at a dilution of 1:100 and an FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Calbiochem, San Diego, Calif.) at a dilution of 1:60. To visualize DNA in the same samples, 0.1 µg of 4,6-diamido-2-phenylindole (DAPI)/ml was also included in the solution. The samples were rinsed successively in PBS and deionized water and then were mounted on glass slides in Aqua Polymount. The samples were allowed to dry in the dark and were viewed with a 100x objective lens on a Nikon Eclipse E400 epifluorescence microscope. Digital images of the cells were captured with a Spot 2 digital camera (Diagnostic Instruments Inc., Sterling Heights, Mich.) using constant exposure times and gain settings. For the labeling of ß-catenin, the Chlamydia-specific antigen, and DAPI-reactive materials, the exposure times were 0.8 s (red), 1.0 s (green), and 0.8 s (blue), with a gain setting of 8. For the labeling of N-cadherin in the primary cell culture, the same exposure times were used, but the gain was set at 16. For the labeling of N-cadherin in the HeLa cells, the exposure times were increased threefold. The digital images were processed using the Image-Pro Plus image analysis software package (Media Cybernetics, Inc., Silver Spring, Md.). All experiments were repeated at least three times and were highly reproducible.
Western blot analysis of ß-catenin. To examine the possibility that C. trachomatis contains proteins that could cross-react with the ß-catenin antibody, protein extracts of C. trachomatis, as well as extracts from the human cervical epithelial cells, were subjected to Western blot analysis. Chlamydia elementary bodies were purified from HeLa 229 cells by differential centrifugation followed by ultracentrifugation over a Renograffin density gradient as previously described (14). The purified elementary bodies were then inactivated with UV light (50), standardized according to protein content (BCA Protein Assay kit; Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, Ill.), and frozen in sterile PBS at -80°C until they were used. Cervical epithelial cells and the isolated C. trachomatis cells were lysed with 1 ml of 4x lithium dodecyl sulfate sample buffer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.) containing 0.5 M dithiothreitol (Invitrogen) at 90°C for 4 min. The samples were subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis using a 4% stacking gel, a 10% separating gel, the standard Laemmli buffer system, and BlueRanger prestained protein molecular weight standards (Pierce Inc.). The separated proteins were electrophoretically transferred from the gels to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. The membranes were blocked in 1% fat-free bovine serum albumin (Sigma)-10 mM Tris-100 mM NaCl-0.1% Tween 20 for 2 h and incubated with the mouse anti-ß-catenin antibody dilution for 2 h at room temperature. The membrane was then incubated in an anti-mouse IgG peroxidase conjugate (Sigma) at a dilution of 1:20,000 for 2 h at room temperature. The ß-catenin probe was visualized using Super Signal West Pico chemiluminescent substrate (Pierce), and the membrane was exposed to X-ray film for 10 s. To visualize total protein, the membrane was stained with GelCode Blue stain reagent (Pierce) according to the manufacturer's protocol.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
To examine the possibility that the ß-catenin labeling in the inclusions resulted from the cross-reactivity of the ß-catenin antibody with a chlamydial protein(s), we first performed BLASTIN and BLASTX sequence similarity searches (5) using human ß-catenin (GenBank accession number NM001904) as the query and the C. trachomatis genome. The results of these searches indicated that there were no statistically significant regions of similarity. In addition, extracts from concentrated isolates of C. trachomatis, as well as the cervical epithelial cells, were subjected to Western blot analysis using the ß-catenin antibody as the probe. As may be seen in Fig. 4, protein extracts from the cervical epithelial cells showed pronounced ß-catenin labeling at an apparent molecular mass of 98 kDa along with unidentified bands at 79 and <27 kDa. By contrast, no ß-catenin labeling was evident in the extracts from C. trachomatis. The absence of labeling in the Chlamydia extracts indicates that there is no cross-reactivity between the ß-catenin antibody and any chlamydial proteins. This strongly suggests that the ß-catenin labeling of the inclusion is, in fact, due to the sequestering of mammalian ß-catenin.
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In considering the possible significance of our findings, it is important to note that in addition to serving as a structural component of adherens junctions, ß-catenin functions as an important component of the so-called wingless, or Wnt, signaling pathway in the regulation of gene expression. Originally described in Drosophila, this pathway appears to be highly conserved in mammalian cells. The details of the Wnt/ß-catenin signaling pathway and the possible roles that it may play in developmental biology and in the initiation and progression of cancer have recently been discussed in several excellent reviews (7, 9, 11, 13, 19, 49). The key elements of this signaling pathway are shown schematically in Fig. 6. Under certain conditions, ß-catenin can be released from the junctional complexes into the cytosol, where it may be targeted for proteosomal degradation in a complex process that involves the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene product, or it can be translocated to the nucleus, where it can bind to transcription factors, such as TCF/LEF1, and stimulate the expression of various genes that regulate apoptosis and cell cycle control (10, 11, 13, 19). Activation of ß-catenin signaling has been implicated as a key regulator of a variety of physiologic processes, including cell growth and differentiation, the induction of apoptosis, and carcinogenesis (9, 10, 11, 13, 45).
|
It should be noted that along with the decrease in junction-associated ß-catenin in the infected cells, noninfected cells also showed a decrease in the amount of ß-catenin at the cell-cell contacts. The most likely explanation for this phenomenon is that the disruption of cadherin/catenin-mediated adhesion in one cell indirectly affects adjacent cells. In noninfected cells that are adjacent to an infected cell, there would be nothing for the cadherin/catenin complex to adhere to on the surface of the infected cell. Since each cell is normally attached to many others, infection of just a few cells could affect catenin localization in many cells. Whether this has any functional consequences for ß-catenin signaling in noninfected cells remains to be seen.
Another interesting question that arises is whether the effects of C. trachomatis on ß-catenin may be related to the increased risk of cervical cancer that has been associated with C. trachomatis infections (6). The ß-catenin-mediated nuclear signaling system has been implicated in a variety of existing cancers, and activation of this system has been suggested to play a role in the induction of oncogenes and the carcinogenic transformation of cells (7, 9, 11, 26, 35, 38, 55). Intuitively, it might seem that the ability of C. trachomatis to sequester ß-catenin in the inclusion bodies would inhibit ß-catenin-mediated nuclear signaling and, if anything, prevent the carcinogenic transformation of cells. However, it is important to note that the present study focused on the early stages of chlamydial infection and did not explore the long-term fate of the Chlamydia-ß-catenin interaction. Specifically, chlamydial infection of a host cell in vivo may not always result in host cell lysis, as is normally observed in most in vitro systems. As reviewed by Beatty et al. (8), stressors, such as heat, cytokines, nutrient deprivation, or suboptimal antimicrobial therapy, may induce persistent nonlytic chlamydial infections of host cells and elaborate a structurally and physiologically altered form of the organism. Could such persistent infections prevent host cell lysis or apoptosis and thereby eventually allow a transformation event to occur? While we do not yet know the fate of ß-catenin during the later stages of active or persistent infection, this would be an interesting area for future research.
While this study was under revision, Belland et al. (10) published a report showing that the C. trachomatis strains MoPn and D caused HeLa cells to separate from each other and that this effect may be mediated by a specific chlamydial cytotoxin that resembles known clostridial cytotoxins. At present, it is not clear whether this cytotoxin is involved in mediating the effects of C. trachomatis on N-cadherin and ß-catenin, although this too would be an interesting area for future research.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Victoria Seas for her help with the manuscript.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Adams, C. L., and W. J. Nelson. 1998. Cytomechanics of cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 10:152-157. |
| 2. | Adams, C. L., W. J. Nelson, and S. J. Smith. 1996. Quantitative analysis of cadherin-catenin actin reorganization during development of cell-cell adhesion. J. Cell Biol. 135:1899-1911. |
| 3. | Ahmed, Y., S. Hayashi, A. Levine, and E. Wieschaus. 1998. Regulation of armadillo by a Drosophila APC inhibits neuronal apoptosis during retinal development. Cell 93:1171-1182.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 4. | Alattia, J. R., H. Kurokawa, and M. Ikura. 1999. Structural view of cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 55:359-367.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 5. | Altschul, S. F., T. L. Madden, A. A. Schäffer, J. Zhang, Z. Zhang, W. Miller, and D. J. Lipman,. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:3389-3402. |
| 6. | Anttila, T., P. Saikku, P. Koskela, A. Bloigu, J. Dillner, I. Ikaheimo, E. Jellum, M. Lehtinen, P. Lenner, T. Hakulinen, A. Narvanen, E. Pukkala, S. Thoreson, L. Youngman, and J. Paavonen. 2001. Serotypes of Chlamydia trachomatis and risk for development of cervical squamous cell carcinoma. JAMA 285:47-51. |
| 7. | Barker, N., P. Morin, and H. Clevers. 2000. The yin-yang of TCF/ß-catenin signaling. Adv. Cancer Res. 77:1-24.[Medline] |
| 8. | Beatty, W. L., R. P. Morrison, and G. I. Byrne. 1994. Persistent chlamydiae: from cell culture to a paradigm for chlamydial pathogenesis. Microbiol. Rev. 58:686-699. |
| 9. | Beavon, I. R. G. 2000. The E-cadherin-catenin complex in tumour metastasis: structure, function and regulation. Eur. J. Cancer 36:1607-1620. |
| 10. | Belland, R. J., M. A., Scidmore, D. B. Crane, D. M. Hogan, W. Whitmire, G. McClarty, and H. D. Caldwell. 2001. Chlamydia trachomatis cytotoxicity associated with complete and partial cytotoxin genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:13984-13989. |
| 11. | Ben-Ze'ev, A., M. Shtutman, and J. Zhurinsky. 2000. The integration of cell adhesion with gene expression: the role of ß-catenin. Exp. Cell Res. 261:75-82.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 12. | Boller, K., D. Vestweber, and R. Kemler. 1985. Cell adhesion molecule uvomorulin is localized in the intermediate junctions of adult intestinal epithelial cells. J. Cell Biol. 100:327-332. |
| 13. | Cadigan, K. M., and R. Nusse. 1997. Wnt signaling: a common theme in animal development. Genes Dev. 11:3286-3305. |
| 14. | Caldwell, H. D., J. Kromhout, and J. Schachter. 1981. Purification and partial characterization of the major outer membrane protein of Chlamydia trachomatis. Infect. Immun. 31:1161-1176. |
| 15. | Carmeliet, P., M. G. Lampugnani, L. Moons, F. Breviario, V. Compernolle, F. Bono, G. Balconi, R. Spagnuolo, B. Oostuyse, M. Dewerchin, A. Zanetti, A. Angellilo, V. Mattot, D. Nuyens, E. Lutgens, F. Clotmann, M. C. de Ruiter, A. Gittenberger-de Groot, R. Poelmann, F. Lupu, J. M. Herbert, D. Collen, and E. Dejana. 1999. Targeted deficiency or cytosolic truncation of the VE-cadherin gene in mice impairs VEGF-mediated endothelial survival and angiogenesis. Cell 98:147-157.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 16. | Collares-Buzato, C. B., G. T. A. McEwan, M. A. Jepson, N. L. Simmons, and B. H. Hirst. 1994. Paracellular barrier and junctional protein distribution depend on basolateral Ca2+ in cultured epithelia. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1222:147-158.[Medline] |
| 17. | Cotter, T. W., Q. Meng, Z. Shen, Y. Zhang, H. Su, and H. D. Caldwell. 1996. Protective efficacy of major outer membrane protein specific immunoglobulin A (IgA) and IgG monoclonal antibodies in a murine model of Chlamydia trachomatis genital tract infection. Infect. Immun. 63:4704-4714.[Abstract] |
| 18. | Cotter, T. W., G. S. Miranupuri, K. H. Ramsey, C. E. Poulsen, and G. I. Byrne. 1997. Reactivation of chlamydial genital tract infection in mice. Infect. Immun. 65:2067-2073.[Abstract] |
| 19. | Dale, T. C. 1998. Signal transduction by the wnt family of ligands. Biochem. 329:209-223. |
| 20. | Damalas, A., A. Ben-Ze'ev, I. Simcha, M. Shtutman, J. F. Leal, J. Zhurinsky, B. Geiger, and M. Oren. 1999. Excess beta-catenin promotes accumulation of transcriptionally active p53. EMBO J. 18:3054-3063.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 21. | Dean, D., and V. C. Powers. 2001. Persistent Chlamydia trachomatis infections resist apoptotic stimuli. Infect. Immun. 69:2442-2447. |
| 22. | Fan, T., H. Lu, H. Hu, L. Shi, G. A. McClarty, D. M. Nance, A. H. Greenberg, and G. Zhong. 1998. Inhibition of apoptosis in chlamydia-infected cells: blockade of mitochondrial cytochrome c release and caspase activation. J. Exp. Med. 187:487-496. |
| 23. | Gallin, W. J. 1998. Evolution of the "classical" cadherin family of cell adhesion molecules in vertebrates. Mol. Biol. E 15:1099-1107. |
| 24. | Hackstadt, T. 1999. Cell Biology, p. 101-138. In R. S. Stephens (ed.), Chlamydia: intracellular biology, pathogenesis, and immunity. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C. |
| 25. | Hatch, T. 1999. Developmental biology, p. 29-67. In R. S. Stephens (ed.), Chlamydia: intracellular biology, pathogenesis, and immunity. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C. |
| 26. | He, T.-C., A. B. Sparks, C. Rago, H. Hermeking, L. Zawel, L. T. da Costa, P. J. Morin, B. Vogelstein, and K. W. Kinzler. 1998. Identification of c-MYC as a target of the APC pathway. Science 281:1509-1512. |
| 27. | Herrenknecht, K., M. Ozawa, C. Esckerskorn, F. Lottsperch, M. Lenter, and R. Kemler. 1991. The uvomorulin-anchorage protein alpha-catenin is a vinculin homologue. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:9156-9160. |
| 28. | Jepson, M. A., C. B. Collares-Buzato, M. A. Clark, B. H. Hirst, and S. L. Simmons. 1995. Rapid disruption of epithelial barrier function by Salmonella typhimurium is associated with structural modification of intercellular junctions. Infect. Immun. 63:356-359.[Abstract] |
| 29. | Kim, K., K. M. Pang, M. Evans, and E. D. Hay. 2000. Over-expression of ß-catenin induces apoptosis independent of its transactivation function with LEF-1 or the involvement of major G1 cell cycle regulators. Mol. Biol. Cell 11:3509-3523. |
| 30. | Lecuit, M., R. Hurme, J. Pizarro-Cerda, H. Ohayon, B. Geiger, and P. Cossant. 2000. A role for and ß-catenins in bacterial uptake. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:10008-10013. |
| 31. | Lecuit, M., S. Vandermael-Pournin, J. Lefort, M. Huerre, P. Gounon, C. Dupuy, C. Babinet, and P. Cossart. 2001. A transgenic model for listeriosis: role of internalin in crossing the intestinal barrier. Science 292:1722-1725. |
| 32. | Majeed, M., and E. Kihlstrom. 1991. Mobilization of F-actin and clathrin during redistribution of Chlamydia trachomatis to an intracellular site in eucaryotic cells. Infect. Immun. 59:4465-4472. |
| 33. | Majeed, M., J. D. Ernst, K.-E. Magnusson, E. Kihlstrom, and O. Stendahl. 1994. Selective translocation of annexins during intracellular redistribution of Chlamydia trachomatis in HeLa and McCoy cells. Infect. Immun. 62:126-134. |
| 34. | Majeed, M., M. Gustafsson, E. Kihlstrom, and O. Stendahl. 1993. Roles of Ca2+ and F-actin in intracellular aggregation of Chlamydia trachomatis in eucaryotic cells. Infect. Immun. 61:1406-1414. |
| 35. | Mann, B., M. Gelso, A. Siedow, M. L. Hanski, A. Grachev, M. Ilyas, W. F. Bodmer, M. P. Moyer, E. O. Riecken, H. J. Buhr, and C. Hanski. 1999. Target genes of ß-catenin-T-cell-factor/lymphoid-enhancer-factor signaling in human colorectal carcinomas. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:1603-1608. |
| 36. | McCrea, P. D., C. W. Turck, and B. Gumbiner. 1991. A homolog of the armadillo protein in Drosophila (plakoglobin) associated with E-cadherin. Science 254:1350-1361. |
| 37. | Mengaud, J., H. Ohayon, P. Gounon, R.-M. Mege, and P. Cossart. 1996. E-cadherin is the receptor for internalin, a surface protein required for entry of L. monocytogenes into epithelial cells. Cell 84:923-932.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 38. | Morin, P. J., A. B. Sparks, V. Korinek, N. Baker, H. Clevers, B. Vogelstein, and K. W. Kinzler. 1997. Activation of ß-catenin-Tcf signaling in colon cancer by mutations in ß-catenin or APC. Science 275:1787-1790. |
| 39. | Mounier, J., T. Vasselon, R. Hellio, M. Lesourd, and P. J. Sansonetti. 1992. Shigella flexneri enters human colonic Caco-2 epithelial cells through the basolateral pole. Infect. Immun. 60:237-248. |
| 40. | Nagar, B., M. Overduin, M. Ikura, and J. M. Rini. 1996. Structural basis of cadmium induced E-cadherin rigidification and dimerization. Nature 380:360-364.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 41. | Nelson, W. J., E. M. Shore, A. Z. Wang, and R. W. Hammerton. 1990. Identification of a membrane-cytoskeletal complex containing the cell adhesion molecule uvomorulin (E-cadherin), ankyrin, and fodrin in Madin-Darby canine kidney epithelial cells. J. Cell Biol. 110:349-357. |
| 42. | Nollet, F., P. Kools, and F. van Roy. 2000. Phylogenetic analysis of the cadherin superfamily allows identification of six major subfamilies besides several solitary members. J. Mol. Biol. 299:551-572.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 43. | Norvell, S. M., and K. J. Green. 1998. Contributions of extracellular and intracellular domains of full length and chimeric cadherin molecules to junction assembly in epithelial cells. J. Cell Sci. 111:1305-1318.[Abstract] |
| 44. | Ozawa, M., and R. Kemler. 1992. Molecular organization of the uvomorulin-catenin complex. J. Cell Biol. 116:989-996. |
| 45. | Pearson, C. A., and W. C. Prozialeck. 2001. E-cadherin, beta-catenin and cadmium carcinogenesis. Med. Hypotheses 56:573-581.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 46. | Peluso, J. P., A. Pappalardo, and S. A. Hess. 2000. Effect of disrupting cell contact on the nuclear accumulation of ß-catenin and subsequent apoptosis of rat ovarian surface epithelial cells in vitro. Endocrine 12:295-302.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 47. | Pertz, O., D. Bozic, A. W. Koch, C. Fauser, A. Brancaccio, and J. Engel. 1999. A new crystal structure, Ca2+ dependence and mutational analysis reveal molecular details of E-cadherin homoassociation. EMBO J. 18:1738-1747.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 48. | Pokutta, S., K. Herrenknecht, R. Kemler, and J. Engel. 1994. Conformational changes in the recombinant extracellular domain of E-cadherin upon calcium binding. Eur. J. Biochem. 223:1019-1026.[Medline] |
| 49. | Potter, E., C. Bergwitz, and G. Brabant. 1999. The cadherin-catenin system: implications for growth and differentiation of endocrine tissues. Endocr. Rev. 20:207-239. |
| 50. | Ramsey, K. H., W. J. Newhall, and R. G. Rank. 1989. Humoral immune response to chlamydial genital infection of mice with the agent of mouse pneumonitis. Infect. Immun. 57:2441-2446. |
| 51. | Redies, C. 2000. Cadherins in the central nervous system. Prog. Neurobiol. 61:611-648.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 52. | Ringwald, M., R. Schuh, D. Vestweber, H. Eistetter, F. Lottsperch, J. Engel, R. Dolz, F. Jahnig, J. Epplen, S. Mayer, C. Muller, and R. Kemler. 1987. The structure of cell adhesion molecule uvomorulin. Insights into the mechanisms of Ca2+-dependent cell adhesion. EMBO J. 6:3647-3653.[Medline] |
| 53. | Sansonetti, J. P., J. Mounier, M. C. Prevost, and R.-M. Mege. 1994. Cadherin expression is required for the spread of Shigella flexneri between epithelial cells. Cell 76:829-839.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 54. | Shapiro, L., A. M. Fannon, P. D. Kwong, A. Thompson, M. S. Lehmann, G. Grubel, J. F. Legrund, J. Als-Nielson, D. R. Coleman, and W. A. Hendrickson. 1995. Structural basis of cell-cell adhesion by cadherins. Nature 374:327-337.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 55. | Shtutman, M., J. Zhurinsky, I. Simcha, C. Albanese, M. D'Amico, R. Pestell, and A. Ben-Ze'ev. 1999. The cyclin D1 gene is a target of the beta-catenin/LEF-1 pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:5522-5527. |
| 56. | Takeichi, M. 1990. Cadherins: a molecular family important in selective cell-cell adhesion. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 59:237-252.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 57. | Terres, A. M., J. M. Pajares, D. O'Toole, S. Ahern, and D. Kelleher. 1998. H. pylori infection is associated with down regulation of E-cadherin, a molecule involved in epithelial cell adhesion and proliferation control. J. Clin. Pathol. 51:410-412.[Abstract] |
| 58. | Tran Van Nhieu, G., A. Ben-Ze'ev, and P. J. Sansonetti. 1997. Modulation of bacterial entry into epithelial cells by association between vinculin and the Shigella IpaA invasin. EMBO J. 16:2717-2729.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 59. | Wasserheit, J. N. 1992. Epidemiological synergy. Interrelationships between human immunodeficiency virus infection and other sexually transmitted diseases. Sex. Transm. Dis. 19:61-77.[Medline] |
| 60. | Wong, M. H., B. Rubinfeld, and J. I. Gordon. 1998. Effects of forced expression of an NH2-terminal truncated beta-catenin on mouse intestinal epithelial homeostasis. J. Cell Biol. 141:765-777. |
| 61. | Yap, A. S., W. M. Brieher, and B. M. Gumbiner. 1997. Molecular and functional analysis of cadherin-based adherens junctions. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 113:119-146.[CrossRef] |
| 62. | Zhang, Z., H. Hartmann, V. M. Do, D. Abramowski, C. Sturchler-Pierrat, M. Staufenbiel, B. Sommer, M. van de Wetering, H. Clevers, P. Saftig, B. De Strooper, X. He, and B. A. Yankner. 1998. Destabilization of beta-catenin by mutations in presenilin-1 potentiates neuronal apoptosis. Nature 395:698-702.[CrossRef][Medline] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| J. Bacteriol. | J. Virol. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|
| Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. | Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | All ASM Journals |
|---|