Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, July 2002, p. 3935-3938, Vol. 70, No. 7
0019-9567/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/IAI.70.7.3935-3938.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720,1 the Francis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, California 941432
Received 22 January 2002/ Returned for modification 21 February 2002/ Accepted 2 April 2002
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Chlamydia spp. are responsible for a number of diseases in humans, including ocular infections, respiratory ailments, and sexually transmitted diseases. Chlamydia trachomatis is a leading cause of blindness worldwide and is the most commonly reported bacterial pathogen in the United States. Despite the pervasiveness of the infections caused by Chlamydia, much about Chlamydia virulence and pathogenesis remains unresolved. Of specific importance are the molecules on the surfaces of chlamydiae, especially those required for binding and entry into host cells. A number of molecules on the surfaces of the bacteria have been identified and associated with attachment and entry into host cells; these molecules include major outer membrane protein (9), glycosylated major outer member protein (10), exoglycolipids (8), and heparan sulfate-like molecules (13).
We previously used single-chain, variable-fragment (scFv) monoclonal antibodies to characterize and identify molecules associated with the surfaces of chlamydiae (5). One particular scFv antibody, 3H1-E10, bound to a high-molecular-weight protein associated with the surfaces of infectious chlamydial elementary bodies (EB) that appeared to be of host cell origin. Given that other pathogenic bacteria exploit host cell proteins in order to promote infection, it is possible that chlamydiae utilize a similar strategy. The presence of a host cell molecule on the surfaces of chlamydiae may be responsible for modulating host-pathogen interactions. The purpose of this study was to identify the host cell molecule recognized by scFv antibody 3H1-E10.
Organisms. C. trachomatis serovars L2 (L2/434/Bu) and D (D/UW-3/Cx) were grown in HeLa229 or L929 cell monolayers in T-150 flasks in RPMI medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum and vancomycin. Chlamydial EB were purified with 30 and 30 to 44% discontinuous Renografin gradients (E.R. Squibb and Sons, Princeton, N.J.) as previously described (3).
Immunoblots. Cell and chlamydial lysates were resolved on sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels and transferred to nitrocellulose. Nitrocellulose sheets were incubated for 1 h at room temperature in a phosphate-buffered saline-Tween (PBS-T) solution containing 5% nonfat dried milk. Proteins were probed with polyclonal rabbit anti-fibronectin antibody (1:10,000; Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.) for 1 h at room temperature and then washed three times in PBS-T. Immune reactions were detected with goat anti-rabbit antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (HRP) (Sigma), diluted in PBS-T to 1:2,000, incubated for 1 h at room temperature, and washed three times in PBS-T before detection of immune reactions by chemiluminescence (ECL Kit; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, N.J.).
Glycosaminoglycan-lyase treatment. Fifty microliters of purified EB (1.1 x 108 inclusion-forming units/ml) was centrifuged for 5 min at 10,800 x g. Supernatants were aspirated, and the pellet from each tube was suspended in one of three solutions: 50 µl of PBS, 50 µl of PBS containing 0.05 U of heparitinase, or 50 µl of PBS containing 0.05 U of chondroitinase (Seikagaku America, Falmouth, Mass.). Suspensions were incubated for 90 min at 37°C and then centrifuged at 10,800 x g for 5 min. Supernatants were removed and saved, and the EB in the pellet fraction were washed twice with 50 µl of cold PBS and suspended to a final volume of 50 µl. Samples (12.5 µl) from each supernatant and pellet fraction were electrophoresed on 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels and transferred to nitrocellulose. Polyclonal rabbit anti-fibronectin antibody was used to probe for proteins on the nitrocellulose sheets, and immune reactions were detected by chemiluminescence as described above.
Fibronectin-binding assays. A dot blot assay was used to test binding of fibronectin to chlamydial EB. Purified EB were divided into 150-µl aliquots (5 µg/ml). Serial twofold dilutions of fibronectin (Calbiochem, La Jolla, Calif.) were added to the aliquots of EB and incubated on ice for 30 min. The aliquots of EB were centrifuged for 2 min at 10,800 x g and washed three times in PBS-T. The final pellets were suspended in 150 µl of PBS-T, and 75 µl from each tube was added to each well in a dot blot manifold. All experiments were performed in duplicate. Dot blot wells were washed four times in PBS-T, incubated in blocking buffer (5% nonfat dried milk in PBS-T) for 1 h at room temperature, and washed three times in PBS-T. Primary antibody was added, and the wells were incubated for 1 h at room temperature. The wells were washed three times with 100 µl of PBS-T, and then the entire nitrocellulose sheet was washed three times in PBS-T. The nitrocellulose sheets were cut into strips and then incubated in enzyme-conjugated secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature. Nitrocellulose strips were washed three times in PBS-T, and immune reactions were detected by chemiluminescence.
The high-molecular-weight protein in purified Chlamydia EB lysates is fibronectin.
In the process of screening Chlamydia-specific scFv monoclonal antibodies by immunoblotting, one scFv antibody that binds a high-molecular-weight (
230,000) protein in purified C. trachomatis serovar L2 EB and in uninfected L929 murine cell lysates was identified, namely, 3H1-E10 (5). The cellular localization pattern detected by scFv antibody 3H1-E10 in uninfected L929 cells as determined by immunofluorescence demonstrated that the antigen is on the surfaces of the cells and is a possible component of the extracellular matrix (5). Based on the size of the protein identified by immunoblotting and on the localization pattern from immunofluorescence, we hypothesized that the antigen is fibronectin. This hypothesis was tested by immunoblot analysis using lysates of L929 cells, purified C. trachomatis serovar L2 EB, and purified human fibronectin, which were probed with scFv antibody 3H1-E10. scFv antibody 3H1-E10 bound to a high-molecular-weight protein that comigrated in each sample (Fig. 1A), demonstrating that this antibody is immunoreactive to fibronectin. The specificity of scFv antibody 3H1-E10 for fibronectin was confirmed by performing a replicate immunoblot assay which showed that comigrating bands were reactive to a rabbit antiserum specific for fibronectin (Fig. 1B). We conclude that the Chlamydia-associated antigen recognized by 3H1-E10 is fibronectin.
![]() View larger version (63K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Replicate immunoblots demonstrating the presence of fibronectin associated with purified chlamydial EB. Immunoblots probed with scFv antibody 3H1-E10 (A) and fibronectin-specific rabbit serum (B) are shown. Lane Fn, purified fibronectin; lane L, lysate of uninfected murine L929 cells; lane L2, lysate of C. trachomatis L2 EB harvested from murine L929 cells. A molecular weight marker (in thousands) is shown on the left.
|
![]() View larger version (47K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. (A) scFv antibody 3H1-E10 is immunoreactive to fibronectin, as shown by immunoblot analysis, in lysates of murine L929 cells and C. trachomatis serovar L2. Lane EB, lysate of C. trachomatis L2 EB harvested from murine L929 cells; lane L929, lysate of uninfected murine L929 cells; lane Fn, purified fibronectin; lane HeLa, lysate of uninfected HeLa229 cells. Immunoblots were probed with scFv antibody 3H1-E10, and immunoreactive bands were detected with anti-E tag antibody and anti-mouse Fc-specific HRP-conjugated antibody. (B) Anti-fibronectin antibody binds C. trachomatis serovar D EB-associated antigen and an antigen in murine L929 cells and HeLa cells. Lane L929, lysate of uninfected murine L929 cells; lane D EB (L929), lysate of C. trachomatis serovar D EB harvested from murine L929 cells; lane HeLa, lysate of uninfected HeLa229 cells; lane D EB (HeLa), lysate of C. trachomatis serovar D EB harvested from HeLa229 cells. Immunoblots A and B contained equal amounts of host cell lysates and EB lysates. Blot B was probed with polyvalent rabbit serum specific for fibronectin; immunoreactive bands were detected with anti-rabbit specific HRP-conjugated antibody. Molecular weight markers (in thousands) are shown to the left of both panels.
|
![]() View larger version (21K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Fibronectin binds to the surface of chlamydial EB, as shown by dot blotting. (Top) C. trachomatis serovar D EB were incubated with the indicated increasing amounts of exogenous human fibronectin. EB-bound fibronectin was detected with anti-fibronectin rabbit serum and a goat anti-rabbit HRP-conjugated antibody. (Bottom) Dot blots show (left to right) reactivities of EB to (i) monospecific anti-Pgp3 antibody, which is reactive to a highly expressed chlamydial cytosolic protein; (ii) the monoclonal antibody specific for OmpA, a highly expressed chlamydial surface protein; and (iii) the anti-Pgp3 antibody to EB, lysed prior to probing with antibody.
|
![]() View larger version (38K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Sensitivity of EB-associated fibronectin to heparitinase. C. trachomatis serovar D EB were incubated in the presence of heparitinase or chondroitinase for 30 min and washed with PBS. Fibronectin in the EB-containing pellet and the supernatant was detected by immunoblotting. The contents of all lanes were incubated with rabbit anti-fibronectin antibody and detected with goat anti-rabbit HRP conjugated antibody.
|
The finding of fibronectin associated with the surfaces of chlamydial EB raises questions as to the role of EB surface heparan sulfate in fibronectin binding and the role of fibronectin in mediating host cell adhesion or invasion. Zhang et al. (13) tested whether saturating EB with fibronectin would alter infectivity and found that it inhibited infectivity. Moreover, Wyrick et al. (12) tested whether integrins play a role in chlamydial infectivity using integrin-specific monoclonal antibodies and found that antibodies to
5- and ß1-integrins did not affect chlamydial infectivity. Thus, whether the presence of host cell fibronectin on EB has biological significance in mediating host cell interactions such as adhesion, uptake, or the modulation of immune responses is intriguing but remains to be elucidated. The finding of host cell fibronectin bound to the surface of EB and to other uncharacterized proteins (5) suggests that bioactive components derived in host tissues could be expected to associate with EB in vivo and to modulate chlamydial pathogenesis. The determination of a specific role for fibronectin, heparan sulfate, or other chlamydial proteins in host cell adhesion and invasion will be unequivocally resolved only when the host cell receptor(s) is identified.
|
|
|---|
subunit. Sequence and structural comparison of conserved and unique regions with Escherichia coli
70 and Bacillus subtilis
43. J. Biol. Chem. 265:13206-13214.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2010 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»