Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, September 2002, p. 5086-5090, Vol. 70, No. 9
0019-9567/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/IAI.70.9.5086-5090.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Centro de Biotecnologia, Instituto Butantan,1 Seção de Bacteriologia, Instituto Adolfo Lutz, São Paulo, Brazil2
Received 18 March 2002/ Returned for modification 1 May 2002/ Accepted 10 June 2002
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
An alternative to conjugated vaccines could be the use of protective protein antigens that are expressed in the great majority of pneumococcal strains. Pneumococcal surface protein A (PspA) is one of the most promising vaccine candidates; passive immunization with anti-PspA antibodies or active immunization with purified full-length or truncated PspA has been shown to protect mice against infection with pneumococci of different serotypes (10, 14). Recently, immunization of humans with a single recombinant fragment of PspA was shown to induce antibodies that passively protect mice against challenge with different S. pneumoniae strains (4). PspA has been shown to be involved in iron limitation overcome through binding to lactoferrin (7) and also has been shown to inhibit complement activation (15). One of the concerns with the use of this protein as a vaccine is the structural and antigenic variability among different strains (5). PspA is composed of five domains: a signal peptide, an
-helical domain, a proline-rich region, a choline binding domain, and a C-terminal tail (18). Antigenic variability has been mapped to the highly charged
-helical N-terminal region of PspA (11). Hollingshead et al. (8) proposed a classification for PspA based on divergence of the amino acid sequence located just before the proline-rich region, designated the clade-defining region (CDR). This classification divides PspA into three families: family 1, composed of clades 1 and 2; family 2, composed of clades 3, 4, and 5; and family 3, rarely isolated and composed of clade 6. Since cross-reactivity between families is restricted, they propose that PspA molecules from families 1 and 2 should be included in a vaccine formulation.
Genetic immunization with the region encoding the
-helical domain of PspA from strain Rx1 (clade 2) was recently shown to elicit protective immunity against S. pneumoniae (2). In this work, we cloned different PspA fragments belonging to clades 1, 2, 3, and 4 into DNA vaccine vectors and analyzed the cross-reactivity of anti-PspA antibodies, as well as the cross-protection against intraperitoneal challenge with S. pneumoniae induced by immunization of mice with each of the constructs.
|
|
|---|
grown in Luria-Bertani medium supplemented with ampicillin (100 µg/ml). Strains of S. pneumoniae isolated in Brazil from invasive infections were obtained from Instituto Adolfo Lutz (São Paulo, Brazil); these strains were seeded into blood agar tubes and grown overnight at 37°C. Cultures were then grown in Todd-Hewitt liquid medium containing 0.5% yeast extract (Difco, Detroit, Mich.) and incubated with gentle shaking at 37°C. Cultures in the exponential phase were frozen and stored at -80°C in Todd-Hewitt liquid medium containing 0.5% yeast extract and 10% glycerol. The viability of bacterial stocks was analyzed prior to challenge. DNA vaccine vectors. The vectors used for nucleic acid immunization were based on the pTARGET expression vector (Promega, Madison, Wis.), in which the gene is expressed under human cytomegalovirus immediate early promoter-enhancer control. Different DNA fragments encoding PspAs from of clades 1, 2, 3, and 4 were cloned by PCR from genomic DNA into pTARGET. Table 1 shows the strains from which fragments were cloned, the PspA domains present in each fragment, and the primers used for cloning. In all cases, the ACC Kozak consensus sequence for vertebrate mRNAs was added before the ATG start codon (9). The DNA sequences were analyzed with an ABI Prism DNA sequencer (PE Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. PspA fragments
|
Immunization of mice.
Plasmid DNA was purified from E. coli DH5
by anion-exchange chromatography with a Concert High-Purity Maxiprep system (Life Technologies). Female BALB/c mice from Instituto Butantan (São Paulo, Brazil) were inoculated in each muscle tibialis anterior as previously described (6) with 50 µl of 10 µM cardiotoxin (Latoxan, Valence, France) and then after 5 days with 25 µg of plasmid DNA in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (50 µl). The mice received a booster dose under the same conditions after 3 weeks and were bled from the retroorbital plexus 3 and 6 weeks after priming for detection of anti-PspA serum antibodies. For immunization with purified proteins, mice were injected intraperitoneally with 10 µg of protein with Al(OH)3 as the adjuvant and were boosted under the same conditions after 3 weeks.
Determination of anti-PspA serum antibodies and isotyping. Antibodies against PspA were detected by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Briefly, Polysorp 96-well plates (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) were coated with PspA (1 µg/ml) isolated by choline chloride washing from S. pneumoniae strains expressing PspA belonging to different clades, as previously described (3). The plates were washed three times with PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20 and blocked with 10% nonfat dry milk in PBS. The plates were then incubated with serial dilutions of sera from the immunized mice in PBS-1% bovine serum albumin at 37°C for 1 h. The plates were washed as described above and incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (1:2,000) (Sigma) in PBS-1% bovine serum albumin at 37°C for 1 h. Following the washes, antibodies were detected by adding OPD substrate (0.04% o-phenylenediamine in citrate-phosphate buffer [pH 5] containing 0.01% H2O2). After color development (10 min), the reaction was interrupted with 1.25 M H2SO4, and the A492 was determined. The reciprocal titer was considered the last dilution of serum that registered an optical density of 0.10. IgG1 and IgG2a were also detected by the ELISA by using mouse monoclonal antibody isotyping reagents (Sigma).
Intraperitoneal challenge. Mice were challenged intraperitoneally with 2 x 106 CFU of S. pneumoniae, and survival of mice was analyzed daily for 21 days. Inactive sick animals were euthanized. Differences in the overall survival rates between groups were analyzed by the Fisher exact test.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers. The pspA sequences have been deposited in the GenBank database under accession no. AY082387 to AY082390.
|
|
|---|
-helix (including the CDR) and the proline-rich region, while pTG-pspA2 and pTG-pspA4 encode only the CDR. The predicted amino acid sequences were analyzed, and the cloned fragments were divided into the different clades according to the classification proposed by Hollingshead et al. (8). DNA vaccines encoding fusions between clade 1 and clade 4 fragments (pTG-pspA1/4) and between clade 3 and clade 2 fragments (pTG-pspA3/2) were also constructed for expression of PspA fusions composed of fragments of both family 1 and family 2. Expression of PspA in mammalian cells. DNA vaccine vectors pTG-pspA1, pTG-pspA2, pTG-pspA3, and pTG-pspA4 were transfected into BHK-21 cells, and expression of the PspA fragments was analyzed 1 day after transfection by Western blotting with antisera raised against native PspA purified from a pneumococcal strain expressing clade 1 PspA (anti-PspA1) and one expressing clade 3 PspA (anti-PspA3). Expression of PspA by pTG-pspA1 was analyzed with both sera but was detected only with anti-PspA1 (Fig. 1A). Expression of PspA by pTG-pspA3 was also analyzed with both sera and was detected only with anti-PspA3 (Fig. 1B). These results indicate that the antisera used show little cross-reactivity between families, since clade 1 belongs to family 1 and clade 3 to family 2. Expression of the CDR from PspA2 was not observed in cells transfected with pTG-pspA2, and expression of PspA4 from pTG-pspA4 was not detected with any of the antisera (data not shown). Expression of the PspA fusion protein by pTG-pspA1/4 was also not detected by Western blotting (data not shown), which could indicate a lower level of expression than the level observed with pTG-pspA1. On the other hand, expression of the fusion protein by pTG-pspA3/2 was observed when anti-PspA3 (Fig. 2) was used, although the levels were lower than the levels observed with pTG-pspA3.
![]() View larger version (37K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Transient expression of PspA by the DNA vaccine vectors in BHK-21 cells. Total extracts of BHK-21 cells transformed or not transformed with the vectors were analyzed by Western blotting by using anti-PspA1 (A) or anti-PspA3 (B) antiserum. The positions of standard molecular weight markers are indicated on the right.
|
![]() View larger version (36K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Transient expression of PspA fusion by the DNA vaccine vector in BHK-21 cells. Total extracts of BHK-21 cells transformed or not transformed with the vectors were analyzed by Western blotting by using anti-PspA3 antiserum. The positions of standard molecular weight markers are indicated on the right.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Antibody titers induced by immunization with DNA vaccine vectors
|
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Induction of IgG1 and IgG2a by immunization with the DNA vaccine vectors. BALB/c mice were immunized with the DNA vaccine vectors or purified proteins, sera were collected 6 weeks after priming, and anti-PspA IgG1 and IgG2a were detected by ELISA in plates coated with PspA1 (A) or PspA3 (B). The log of the anti-PspA reciprocal antibody titer is shown. The numbers above the bars are the IgG1/IgG2a reciprocal titer ratios.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Survival of mice challenged with St 491/00 (serotype 6B, clade 1 in family 1)
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 4. Survival of mice challenged with St 472/96 (serotype 6B, clade 4 in family 2)
|
|
|
|---|
DNA vaccines containing pspA fragments coding for the complete N-terminal
-helix plus the proline-rich region were expressed in mammalian cells. Immunization of mice with these vaccines induced antibodies that reacted in ELISA only with PspAs from the homologous family. On the other hand, expression of the fragments encoding only the CDR, which was shown to contain the most important antigenic epitopes, was not observed. These results could have been due either to poor expression of the antigen or to a lack of cross-reactivity with the sera used in the Western blot experiments. Furthermore, immunization of mice with these constructs did not induce antibodies to any of the PspAs, not even from the same clade, which reinforces the idea that vaccines encoding only the CDR of PspA might be poorly expressed. DNA vaccines encoding fusions of PspA fragments were also constructed so that the antigens were composed of portions of PspAs from both family 1 and family 2. Although these constructs showed lower expression or could not be detected at all in Western blot experiments, they could elicit antibodies that reacted with PspAs from both families, showing that this could be an interesting approach for the development of vaccines with broader cross-reactivity. Furthermore, balanced IgG1/IgG2a ratios ranging from 0.5 to 1.0 were induced by DNA vaccination, which contrasts with the preferential induction of IgG1 by immunization with purified protein in the presence of alum. Since it was recently shown that the augmentation of antibody-mediated opsonization after intranasal immunization of mice with PspA and interleukin-12 was due mainly to IgG2a (1), we propose that DNA vaccination could be an interesting approach for the development of vaccines against S. pneumoniae.
The challenge experiments described in this paper showed that cross-reactivity of antibodies induced by DNA vaccination does not correlate with cross-protection against intraperitoneal challenge. As expected, mice challenged with a pneumococcal strain that has a clade 1 PspA (family 1) were protected when they were immunized with the DNA vaccines expressing the whole N-terminal region of a clade 1 PspA (pTG-pspA1) or its fusion with the CDR of a clade 4 PspA (pTG-pspA1/4). Expression of a clade 3 PspA or a clade 3-clade 2 PspA fusion did not elicit protection. On the other hand, mice challenged with a pneumococcal strain carrying a clade 4 PspA (family 2) were not protected by the DNA vaccines expressing the whole N-terminal region of either a clade 1 (family 1) or a clade 3 (family 2) PspA, even though pTG-pspA3 did elicit antibodies that cross-reacted with PspA4. DNA vaccines encoding PspA fusions also did not elicit significant protection, even with expression of the CDR of a clade 4 PspA. Protection was thus restricted to immunization with a DNA vaccine expressing a complete N-terminal PspA fragment belonging to the same clade as the strain used for the challenge. The induction of cross-reactive antibodies detected by ELISA does not always correlate completely with functional cross-reactivity. Analysis of serum samples from individuals immunized with pneumococcal vaccines showed that cross-reactive antibodies induced against capsular polysaccharide detected by ELISA do not entirely reflect the opsonophagocytic function of the antibodies (12, 16).
Nevertheless, Briles et al. (4) showed that immunization of humans with recombinant PspA from strain Rx1 (clade 2) could induce passive protection of mice against fatal infection with S. pneumoniae strains expressing either family 1 or family 2 PspAs. The use of DNA vaccination rather than protein vaccination could explain these discrepancies, since the induction of antibody titers by DNA vaccination was lower than the induction of antibody titers by protein immunization. Virulence variation between strains expressing PspA belonging to the same clade could significantly influence challenge experiments and could also explain such differences. Furthermore, it is important to point out that in their study Briles et al. (4) used human sera, while our work was performed with mice. Our results thus confirm the notion that cross-reactivity of PspA is restricted to the same family; however, at least for the pneumococcal strains tested, protection against intraperitoneal challenge was restricted primarily to the same clade.
This work was supported by FAPESP grant 99/05202-1, by Fundação Butantan, and by CNPq grant 520580/00-1 (Brazil).
|
|
|---|
-helical domain of PspA elicits protective immunity against Streptococcus pneumoniae. Infect. Immun. 69:5456-5463.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»