Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, December 2003, p. 7079-7086, Vol. 71, No. 12
0019-9567/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/IAI.71.12.7079-7086.2003
and James M. Musser*
Laboratory of Human Bacterial Pathogenesis, Rocky Mountain Laboratories, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Hamilton, Montana 59840, and Department of Pathology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030
Received 21 May 2003/ Returned for modification 22 July 2003/ Accepted 27 August 2003
|
|
|---|
315.4, these genes were transcribed
independently. Whereas production of immunoreactive SpeK was either
absent or minimal during coculture of GAS with D562 cells, production
of immunoreactive Sla increased substantially. In contrast, despite a
lack of induction of the prophage encoding speA during
coculture of GAS with D562 cells, the speA transcript level
and production of immunoreactive streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin A
(SpeA) increased. Exposure of strain MGAS315 to hydrogen peroxide, an
oxidative stressor, induced the prophage encoding mitogenic factor 4
(MF4), and there was a concomitant increase in the mf4
transcript. All prophages of strain MGAS315 that encode virulence
factors were induced during culture with mitomycin C, a DNA-damaging
agent. However, the virulence factor gene transcript levels and
production of the encoded proteins decreased after mitomycin C
treatment. Taken together, the results indicate that a complex
relationship exists among environmental culture conditions, prophage
induction, and production of prophage-encoded virulence
factors. |
|
|---|
Recent evidence from study of a GAS serotype M1 strain indicates that prophage induction is sensitive to environmental signals. For example, during coculture of GAS with a human pharyngeal epithelial cell line, increased gene copy numbers were associated with increased expression of Spd1 (a DNase also known as mitogenic factor 2 [MF2]) and streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin C (SpeC) (4, 5). In addition, exposure of a GAS serotype M1 strain to human neutrophils stimulated transcriptional up-regulation of the prophage genes spd3 and speH, encoding GAS DNase 3 and streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin H (SpeH), respectively (34).
Inasmuch as serotype M3 strains of GAS are major causes of invasive episodes and pharyngitis cases (25, 29; http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dbmd/abcs/survreports/gas01_provis.pdf),we tested the hypothesis that prophage induction and expression of prophage-encoded virulence factors were influenced by distinct environmental signals. This hypothesis was tested with a highly virulent M3 serotype strain grown in vitro under conditions inferred to approximate in vivo conditions.
|
|
|---|
315.1 does not encode a virulence
factor, whereas prophage
315.4 encodes two virulence factors.
Each of the other four prophages (
315.2,
315.3,
315.5, and
315.6) encodes one virulence factor (Table
1). |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Primers
used for PCR amplification of prophage-specific genesa
|
Tissue culture and media. Immortalized Detroit 562 (D562) pharyngeal epithelial cells were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (CCL-138). The cells were grown to confluence in minimal essential medium (MEM; Invitrogen) supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (BD Biosciences) in 150-cm2 screw cap tissue culture flasks (Corning) at 37°C with 5% CO2.
Culture of strain MGAS315 with D562 epithelial cells. The serum-containing MEM was removed from confluent D562 cells, and the cells were washed twice with prewarmed serum-free MEM (10 ml). Prewarmed serum-free MEM (25 ml) was added, and the D562 cells were incubated for 3 to 4 h at 37°C with 5% CO2. A 1:100 dilution of bacteria (100 ml) was grown to an optical density at 600 nm of 0.2, centrifuged at 3,000 x g for 15 min, washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), suspended in prewarmed serum-free MEM (10 ml), and divided into two 5-ml aliquots. One aliquot was transferred to a flask containing only MEM (control), and the other aliquot was added to a flask containing confluent D562 cells. These flasks were incubated for 3 h at 37°C with 5% CO2.
Phage particle purification, electron microscopy, and phage DNA purification. After 3 h of incubation with mitomycin C, hydrogen peroxide, or D562 cells, bacteria were centrifuged at 8,000 x g for 15 min, and the supernatant was sterilized with a 0.45-µm-pore-size filter (Millipore). The filter-sterilized liquid was centrifuged at 141,000 x g for 4 h at 10°C, and the pellet was suspended in 1 ml of phage suspension buffer. Phage suspension buffer contains 0.15 M NaCl, 10 mM Tris HCl (pH 7.5), 5 mM MgCl2, and 1 mM CaCl2 (24). Intact phage particles present in the suspension buffer will be referred to as a phage suspension. Electron microscopy was conducted at x300,000 magnification on negatively stained (uranyl acetate) phage suspensions.
To purify phage DNA, the phage suspension (0.5 ml) was treated with Benzonase (25 U) (Novagen) for 1 h at 37°C. The phage particles were lysed with 0.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) (Bio-Rad Laboratories), 10 mM EDTA (Sigma), and 500 µg of proteinase K (Sigma)/ml for 1 h at 37°C. Phage DNA was extracted with an equal volume of phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) (Sigma), followed by an equal volume of chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (24:1) (Sigma). Phage DNA was precipitated with a 20% volume of 3 M NaOAc (pH 4.2) (Sigma) and a twofold volume of ethanol at -70°C for 2 h, washed with 70% ethanol, and suspended in distilled H2O.
PCR with purified phage DNA template. Prophage induction was monitored by PCR with forward and reverse primers (Table 1) specific for virulence factor genes encoded by prophages present in the genome of strain MGAS315. PCR was conducted with purified phage DNA template in 50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl, 15 mM MgCl2, 0.25 mM (each) deoxynucleoside triphosphate (pH 8.3), and 0.5 U of Taq polymerase (Promega) for 30 cycles of 1 min at 95°C, 0.5 min at 55°C, and 1 min at 72°C.
Western immunoblot analysis. Supernatants from ultracentrifuged (141,000 x g) cultures were concentrated and examined for prophage-encoded virulence factors by Western immunoblot analysis. Supernatants (10 ml) prepared from strain MGAS315 cultured in PR-THY medium (control) and PR-THY medium plus mitomycin C or hydrogen peroxide were treated with trichloroacetic acid (2 ml) (Sigma) on ice for 10 min, and the precipitates were collected by centrifugation at 8,000 x g for 15 min at 10°C. The pellets were washed twice with ice-cold acetone (Sigma), dried at 100°C for 2 min, and suspended in 0.5 ml of 10 mM Tris, pH 8.0. Supernatants (10 ml) from strain MGAS315 cultured in MEM (control) and MEM containing D562 cells were concentrated with Centricon Plus-20 filters (Amicon) to 0.5 ml. Proteins present in the concentrated supernatants were separated with precast SDS-15% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) (Bio-Rad Laboratories) and transferred (TransBlot; Bio-Rad Laboratories) to nitrocellulose membranes (Protran; Schleicher & Schuell) in Towbin's buffer at 15 V for 1 h. Additionally, previously described recombinant proteins were included in Western immunoblot analyses as positive controls (3, 22). The membranes were incubated for 30 min in PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20 (Bio-Rad Laboratories) (PBST) and 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA; Sigma) and incubated for 1 h with primary antibody (3, 22) (1:10,000) in PBST plus 0.1% BSA. The membranes were washed three times in PBST plus 0.1% BSA, incubated for 1 h with secondary antibody (1:3,000; goat anti-rabbit-conjugated horseradish peroxidase; Santa Cruz), and washed three times in PBST plus 0.1% BSA. The membranes were incubated with Super Signal West Pico chemiluminescent substrate reagent (Pierce) according to directions suggested by the manufacturer, exposed to HyperFilm (Amersham Pharmacia), and developed.
RNA isolation and TaqMan real-time PCR analysis. Bacteria cultured in PR-THY medium, PR-THY medium plus either mitomycin C or hydrogen peroxide, MEM, or MEM plus D562 cells were centrifuged at 8,000 x g and washed once in RNAprotect (10 ml; Qiagen), and total RNA was isolated as described by Smoot et al. (31). The RNA quality was assessed with a model 2100 Bioanalyzer instrument (Agilent Technologies). The absence of contaminating DNA was confirmed by PCR and TaqMan real-time PCR. RNA purified from strain MGAS315 cocultured with MEM (control), MEM plus D562 cells, PR-THY medium (control), or PR-THY medium plus mitomycin C was analyzed by TaqMan real-time PCR for relative speA, speK, sla, and sdn transcript levels. RNA purified from strain MGAS315 cultured with PR-THY medium (control) or PR-THY medium plus hydrogen peroxide was analyzed by TaqMan real-time PCR for the relative mf4 transcript level. Triplicate assays were performed with RNA isolated from three independent cocultures. Two-step multiplex reverse transcription (RT)-PCR with TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) was conducted for each target gene with a 7900HT instrument (Applied Biosystems). The level of proS (prolyl-tRNA synthetase; spy1962) transcript was used to normalize TaqMan threshold cycle (Ct) values obtained for target genes, as described previously (12, 31, 33). Target gene transcript levels under experimental conditions were expressed as the difference (n-fold) relative to target gene transcript levels under control conditions. The differences were determined by dividing the larger normalized target gene transcript level (control or experimental) by the smaller normalized target gene transcript level (control or experimental). A positive value was ascribed to the difference in target gene transcript levels when experimental values exceeded control values. A negative value was ascribed to the difference in target gene transcript levels when control values exceeded experimental values. Primers and probes designed by Primer Express software (Applied Biosystems) were synthesized by Applied Biosystems and labeled with 6-carboxy-4',5'-dichloro-2',7'-dimethylfluorescein (see Table 3).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. TaqMan
primers and probesa
|
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (89K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Electron
microscopy of phage particles purified from strain MGAS315. The
bacteria were treated with mitomycin C and centrifuged at 141,000
x g. Phage particles were suspended in buffer and
negatively stained with uranyl acetate. Magnification =
x300,000.
|
315.4 and
315.6 were induced spontaneously
during the growth of strain MGAS315 in PR-THY medium (Table
2 and Fig. 2). In contrast,
prophages
315.2,
315.3, and
315.5 were
induced by mitomycin C treatment but were not spontaneously induced
during growth in PR-THY medium (Table
2 and Fig.
2). There were clear qualitative differences in the degree of induction of
each phage. For example, prophage
315.2, which encodes
streptococcal superantigen (SSA), was induced at a very low level by
mitomycin C treatment, whereas the levels of induction of prophage
315.5 (encoding SpeA3) and prophage
315.3 (encoding
MF4) were demonstrably higher (Fig.
2). Taken together, these
results indicated that each of the five prophages in strain MGAS315
that encode virulence factors can be induced and hence are not simply
defective prophage-like elements. |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Induction
of prophages in strain MGAS315
|
![]() View larger version (56K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. PCR
amplification of virulence factor genes present in culture supernatants
of GAS. PCR was conducted with purified phage DNA templates obtained
from strain MGAS315 cultured with PR-THY medium (control) (A), PR-THY
medium plus mitomycin C (B), or PR-THY medium plus hydrogen peroxide
(0.5 mM) (C). The genes that were amplified are listed above the lanes.
The speB gene was used as a negative control to confirm that
there was no contaminating GAS chromosomal DNA in the phage
preparations. speA, streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin A;
ssa, streptococcal superantigen; mf4, mitogenic
factor 4; speK, streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin K;
sla, phospholipase A2; sdn,
streptodornase; speB, streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin
B.
|
in Escherichia coli
(6). To determine if
hydrogen peroxide treatment induced the prophages present in strain
MGAS315, we conducted experiments analogous to those described above
for mitomycin C treatment. Hydrogen peroxide treatment induced prophage
315.3, encoding MF4, whereas the prophage was not induced
during culture in PR-THY medium alone (Table
2 and Fig.
2).
Prophages
induced during exposure of strain MGAS315 to D562 pharyngeal epithelial
cells.
Coculture of a
serotype M1 GAS strain with immortalized eukaryotic epithelial cells
has been reported to induce prophages
(4,
5). We assessed whether
prophages were induced by coculture of strain MGAS315 with D562 human
pharyngeal epithelial cells. Prophage
315.6, encoding Sdn, was
induced spontaneously at a very low level during culture of strain
MGAS315 in MEM alone (Table
2 and Fig.
3). Induction of this prophage was enhanced substantially during
coculture with D562 cells (Table
2 and Fig.
3). Similarly, induction
of prophage
315.4 (encoding SpeK and Sla) was increased
greatly when strain MGAS315 was cultured with D562 pharyngeal cells
(Table 2 and Fig.
3).
![]() View larger version (36K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Induction
of phages during strain MGAS315 coculture with pharyngeal epithelial
cells. PCR was conducted with purified phage DNA templates obtained
from strain MGAS315 cultured in MEM (A) or MEM plus D562
cells (B). The genes that were amplified are listed above the lanes.
The speB gene was used as a negative control to confirm that
there was no contaminating GAS chromosomal DNA in the phage
preparations. speA, streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin A;
ssa, streptococcal superantigen; mf4, mitogenic
factor 4; speK, streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin K;
sla, phospholipase A2; sdn,
streptodornase; speB, streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin
B.
|
315.4 and
315.5 carrying these genes (Fig.
2).
![]() View larger version (57K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Western
immunoblot analysis of prophage-encoded secreted proteins made by
MGAS315 during culture with mitomycin C. Proteins present in the
culture supernatant were precipitated, separated by
SDS-12% PAGE, and transferred to nitrocellulose. The
membranes were probed with primary rabbit antibody (1:10,000) specific
for each protein and secondary antibody (1:3,000) conjugated to
horseradish peroxidase, and reactivity was visualized with
chemiluminescent reagents. The treatments were as follows: PR-THY
medium and mitomycin C
(MMC).
|
315.5 (encoding SpeA3) was not induced
by culture of strain MGAS315 in MEM alone, or coculture with D562
cells, we did not necessarily expect that the amounts of immunoreactive
SpeA in culture supernatants would differ for these two treatments.
However, SpeA was present in the culture supernatant prepared from
strain MGAS315 grown in MEM alone, and the level of immunoreactive SpeA
protein in the culture supernatant increased during coculture with D562
cells (Fig. 5). These data
indicated that in vitro production of SpeA by strain MGAS315 occurred
independently of prophage induction.
![]() View larger version (48K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Western
immunoblot analysis of prophage-encoded secreted proteins made by
MGAS315 during coculture with D562 epithelial cells. Proteins present
in the culture supernatant were concentrated, separated by
SDS-12% PAGE, and transferred to nitrocellulose. The
membranes were probed with primary rabbit antibody (1:10,000) specific
for each protein and secondary antibody (1:3,000) conjugated to
horseradish peroxidase, and reactivity was visualized with
chemiluminescent
reagents.
|
TaqMan real-time PCR analysis of prophage-encoded virulence factor transcript levels during culture of strain MGAS315 with mitomycin C, hydrogen peroxide, and human D562 pharyngeal epithelial cells. The results described above indicated that increased virulence factor gene copy numbers during prophage induction did not necessarily correlate with an increased level of immunoreactive protein in culture supernatants. TaqMan real-time PCR analysis was used to test the hypothesis that the level of transcripts of prophage-encoded virulence factors correlated with the level of immunoreactive protein present in culture supernatants (Table 3). The results showed that the level of immunoreactive protein in the culture supernatant was related to the transcript levels of the prophage-encoded virulence factor genes (Fig. 6). For example, mitomycin C treatment resulted in decreased levels of speA, speK, and sla transcripts and immunoreactive SpeA, SpeK, and Sla present in the culture supernatant (Fig. 6). In contrast, coculture of strain MGAS315 with D562 cells resulted in increased levels of speA, speK, and sla transcripts and immunoreactive SpeA, SpeK, and Sla in the culture supernatant (Fig. 6). Due to a lack of specific antibodies, we were unable to examine the level of immunoreactive Sdn and MF4 present in culture supernatants. However, we note that the level of sdn transcript decreased during mitomycin C treatment and increased during induction of the prophage containing this gene during coculture with D562 cells (Fig. 6). In addition, hydrogen peroxide treatment resulted in an increased level of mf4 transcript concomitant with induction of the prophage containing this gene (Fig. 6).
![]() View larger version (12K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Transcript
levels of prophage-encoded genes in strain MGAS315 during culture with
mitomycin C, hydrogen peroxide, and D562 epithelial cells relative to
transcript levels under control conditions. Gene names are listed on
the y axis. Relative transcript levels of genes after exposure
to mitomycin C (black), hydrogen peroxide (red), and D562 epithelial
cell coculture (blue) were normalized to the transcript level of
proS, a constitutively expressed endogenous gene
(10,
27). The mean transcript
levels (± standard errors of the mean) of the prophage-encoded
genes under experimental conditions are expressed as differences
(n-fold) relative to control
conditions.
|
315.4. The levels of
immunoreactive SpeK and Sla in culture supernatants from strain MGAS315
cocultured with D562 cells differed significantly, suggesting that the
two genes may be transcribed independently. Consistent with this
possibility, with a neural network program
(http://www.fruitfly.org/seq_tools/promoter.html),
we identified canonical promoter sequences located immediately upstream
of the start codon for each gene. In addition, a predicted
rho-independent transcriptional terminator sequence was identified 116
nucleotides upstream of the sla start methionine
(9;
http://www.tigr.org/software/transterm.html).
Taken together, these findings led us to hypothesize that speK
and sla are each expressed as a single transcript. We used
RT-PCR and RNA purified from strain MGAS315 cocultured with D562 cells
to test this hypothesis. Transcripts specific for each gene were
identified, whereas a polygenic transcript was not identified (Fig.
7). Furthermore, the amounts of speK and sla RT-PCR
products were qualitatively similar to the SpeK and Sla protein levels
in supernatants obtained from the GAS-D562 cell coculture experiments
(Fig.
5).
![]() View larger version (33K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. RT-PCR
analysis of speK and sla transcription. RNA purified
from strain MGAS315 cocultured with D562 epithelial cells was reverse
transcribed into cDNA, and PCR was conducted with primers specific for
speK and sla. The amplicons generated were
speK (1), sla (2), and speK, sla,
and the intergenic region
(3). The template used was
cDNA synthesized from RNA purified from strain MGAS315 cocultured with
D562 epithelial cells (A) or purified chromosomal DNA
(control) (B). The stem-loop structure (not to scale) is located in the
intergenic region (472 bp), 116 nucleotides upstream of the
sla start
codon.
|
|
|
|---|
Environmental
conditions influence GAS prophage induction, prophage-encoded virulence
factor transcription, and levels of immunoreactive protein in culture
supernatants.
Exposure of
strain MGAS315 to D562 epithelial cells induced prophage
315.4
(encoding SpeK and Sla) and prophage
315.6 (encoding Sdn).
Importantly, the induction of prophage
315.4 was linked to
increased transcription of sla and Sla expression. Prophage
315.4 has been closely associated with the recent rapid
dissemination of a distinct subclone of serotype M3 in many regions of
the world (3,
13). Our observation of
substantial up-regulation of Sla production during epithelial cell
interaction supports the hypothesis
(3) that this
extracellular phospholipase A2 is important in
host-pathogen interactions. Additionally, it is possible that the
increase in Sla production during MGAS315 coculture with D562
epithelial cells is related to the previously described secreted factor
made by these immortalized human cells
(4). Alternatively, it is
possible that other as yet unidentified secreted host factors
contribute to the condition-dependent up-regulation of Sla
production.
One additional point is of particular interest. We found that speK and sla were transcribed independently of one another. Hence, it is possible that transcription of these genes occurs differentially in vivo in response to distinct environmental or host signals.
Prophage induction is neither necessary nor sufficient for increased production of prophage-encoded virulence factors. Mitomycin C treatment induced all of the prophage-like elements present in strain MGAS315 that encode virulence factors, resulting in an increase in the copy numbers of the prophage-encoded virulence genes. However, the transcript level and amount of immunoreactive virulence factor protein decreased during mitomycin C treatment relative to the control culture. We speculate that this phenomenon occurs because of a toxic effect of mitomycin C on GAS. An alternative hypothesis is that after phage induction, phage-encoded virulence factors were depleted from the cultured supernatants due to association with phage particles. Since hyaluronidase is known to associate with phage tail proteins in GAS (2), it is possible that phage-encoded DNases and superantigens behave similarly.
The
SpeK-encoding prophage
315.4 was induced during coculture with
D562 cells, but immunogenic SpeK was often absent in culture
supernatants. Conversely, the levels of speA transcript and
immunoreactive SpeA increased during coculture of GAS with D562 cells,
but prophage
315.5, encoding speA, was not induced.
Taken together, these results indicate that an increase in the gene
copy numbers of some prophage-encoded virulence factors in strain
MGAS315 is neither necessary nor sufficient to achieve enhanced
production of extracellular proteins.
Is
induction of strain MGAS315 prophages by oxidative stress a common
theme among DNase-encoding prophages?
Culturing strain MGAS315 with hydrogen
peroxide induced prophage
315.3, encoding mf4, an
extracellular DNase. Of note, the prophage in serotype M1 strain
MGAS5005 that encodes mf3 (
370.3-like), the prophage
in serotype M18 strain MGAS8232 that encodes mf3
(
8232.4), and
315.3 in strain MGAS315 are integrated
at the analogous chromosomal attachment site
(3,
30; A.Madrigal and J. M. Musser, unpublished data). All of these
prophages have reduced genome sizes, and they are very closely related
in overall sequence similarity, suggesting that they have shared a
recent common ancestor
(3). Voyich et al.
(34) reported that
coculture of the serotype M1 strain MGAS5005 with human
polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) resulted in transcriptional
up-regulation of mf3. PMNs kill phagocytized bacteria by
producing hydrogen peroxide and other toxic metabolites
(32). Hence, it is
possible that a common response of GAS to oxidative stress involves
induction of a DNase-encoding prophage and increased DNase production.
Consistent with this idea, the level of mf4 transcript
increased during the culture of strain MGAS315 with hydrogen peroxide.
In addition, we note that Virtaneva et al.
(33) reported that the
level of transcript of another DNase (Sda) was nearly 62-fold higher
than that of the control transcript (from proS) during acute
pharyngitis infection in humans. These observations lead us to
speculate that DNases contribute to the ability of GAS to withstand
phagocytosis and killing by human
PMNs.
Conclusion. The interactions among prophages, their bacterial hosts, and the environment that regulate the genetic switch between the lytic and lysogenic life cycle stages are complex and varied. Bacterial genes and environmental signals that contribute to maintaining lysogeny, participate in development of a lytic state, and alter transcription of phage-encoded virulence factors are poorly understood in GAS. We discovered that prophage induction and expression of prophage-encoded virulence factors occurred in vitro under conditions inferred to approximate some of the environmental signals encountered in vivo during host-pathogen interactions. Importantly, specific external signals induced some prophages but not others. Moreover, prophage induction, transcription of prophage-encoded virulence factors, and virulence factor production were not always linked. Taken together, our results suggest that GAS can respond to variable environments with condition-dependent prophage induction and the expression of prophage-encoded virulence factors. It is worth noting that our results regarding the effects of mitomycin C and hydrogen peroxide on phage induction in GAS might have important implications for antibiotic treatment of GAS infections. Mitomycin C, hydrogen peroxide, and fluoroquinolone antibiotics, which are potent inducers of prophage lambda and the SOS response, promote DNA damage (6, 8). Although we did not examine the effects of DNA-damaging antibiotics on phage induction and the expression of phage-encoded virulence factors in GAS, it is possible that antibiotics that disrupt prokaryote DNA replication could lead to phage induction and the expression of phage-encoded virulence factors in GAS. Indeed, fluoroquinolones that poison DNA topoisomerase II induce Shiga toxin-encoding bacteriophages and toxin production in E. coli (35) and induce bacteriophages in Streptococcus canis (14). Given the critical importance of phages in mediating strain diversity and evolution in GAS, and the contribution of prophage-encoded virulence factors to host-pathogen interactions, it is crucial to unravel the molecular events underlying our observations.
Present
address: Department of Veterinary and Molecular Biology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»