Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, December 2003, p. 7109-7118, Vol. 71, No. 12
0019-9567/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/IAI.71.12.7109-7118.2003
Copyright © 2003, American
Society for
Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Biological Sciences, The University of Iowa,1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa 522422
Received 20 June 2003/ Returned for modification 22 July 2003/ Accepted 28 August 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
1
(31). This graded,
high-frequency switching system is referred to as the
"core" switching system. C. glabrata also
switches reversibly and at high frequency between the smooth colony
phenotypes of the core switching system and an irregular wrinkle
phenotype (7). Finally,
C. glabrata has recently been demonstrated to possess three
mating type-like loci (MTL1, MTL2, and MTL3)
with a configuration similar to that of Saccharomyces
cerevisiae (31,
32). Of the three mating
type-like loci, two (MTL2 and MTL3) appear to contain
silent a and
cassettes, respectively, and the third
(MTL1), the putative expression locus, contains either an
a or an
cassette that defines the mating type of the
cell (i.e., either a or
). In S. cerevisiae,
mating type switching involves a change in the expression cassette from
a to
or
to a by gene conversion with
a copy of the alternate silent donor cassette
(3). Here, we have examined whether core switching and mating type switching occurred at sites of carriage in three patients presenting with vaginal C. glabrata infections. In the reported studies, we tested (i) whether these patients were colonized in both the oral cavity and vagina, (ii) whether the same strain colonized both anatomical cavities, (iii) whether high-frequency phenotypic switching occurred at sites of colonization, (iv) whether a particular switch phenotype dominated sites of infection, (v) whether a single mating type dominated sites of infection, and (vi) whether mating type switching occurred in the host. The results demonstrate that switching occurs at sites of infection, that different switch phenotypes of the same strain can prevail in different anatomical locations in the same host, and that mating type switching can occur in the host.
|
|
|---|
Measurements of phenotypic
switching.
Measurements of
the frequency of phenotypic switching of cells from primary colonies
were obtained as previously described
(8). Cells from a primary
colony visually homogeneous for a single switch phenotype were
inoculated into liquid YPD medium containing 1 mM CuSO4
(YPD-CuSO4) and grown at 25°C until they reached a
concentration of
5 x 106 cells per ml. The
cells were then diluted and evenly distributed on agar plates
containing YPD-CuSO4 medium at a density of 50 to 70 CFU per
plate. The plates were incubated at 25°C for 5 to 7 days and
then scored for the proportions of the different switch
phenotypes.
DNA fingerprinting and computer-assisted analysis. DNA fingerprinting was performed according to methods previously described (12, 17, 25). Total genomic DNA from each C. glabrata isolate was isolated using the methods of Scherer and Stevens (18). Three micrograms of DNA was then digested overnight with EcoRI (4 U/µg of DNA) for 16 h at 37°C, and the resulting DNA fragments were separated in a 0.65% agarose gel at 45 mV. Digested genomic DNA of the C. glabrata reference strain 7549 was run in the outer two lanes of each gel to facilitate computer-assisted analysis of test strains run in the inner lanes (25). The DNA was transferred to a nylon membrane (Hybond N+; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, England) by capillary blotting, hybridized with randomly primed [32P]dCTP-labeled Cg6 probe, and autoradiographed (12).
Gel patterns were analyzed according to methods previously described (25, 28). Autoradiograms were digitized into the data file of the DENDRON software program, version 2.0, using a Scanjet II cx flatbed scanner (Hewlett-Packard, Palo Alto, Calif.). Distortions in the gels were removed with the unwarping option of DENDRON, and the lanes and bands were identified automatically. Southern blot hybridization patterns were compared using a similarity coefficient (SAB) based on the band position for every pair of patterns (samples) according to the following formula: SAB = 2E/(2E + a + b), where E is the number of bands shared by strains A and B, a is the number of bands unique to A, and b is the number of bands unique to B (25). An SAB of 1.0 represents identical patterns, and an SAB of 0.00 represents patterns with no common bands. Intermediate SABs in the range of 0.01 to 0.99 represent patterns with increasing proportions of common bands. Dendrograms based on SAB values were automatically generated by the DENDRON program based on the unweighted-pair-group method (20). For comparisons with collections of previously DNA-fingerprinted isolates, SABs were computed from DENDRON band data files (25).
Determination
of mating type class at the genetic and transcriptional
levels.
Southern analysis
employing specific probes was used to distinguish the three main mating
type classes of C. glabrata: class I (aa
),
which contains MTLa genes at the MTL1 locus;
class II (a
), which contains
MTL
genes at the MTL1 locus; and class III
(a
), which contains MTLa genes
at the MTL1 locus
(31). Genomic DNA of each
C. glabrata isolate was digested with XbaI at
37°C overnight. The resulting fragments were separated in a
0.8% agarose gel, transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane
(Hybond N+), and hybridized with one of the
following three radiolabeled probes: FuncP2, an antisense
oligonucleotide which binds to the MTL
2 open reading
frame (ORF), which will be referred to as the MTL
2
probe; a 395-bp PCR product spanning the 3' flanking region of
MTL1a2, which will be referred to as the
MTLa2 probe; and a 300-bp PCR product unique to the
MTLa1 ORF, which will be referred to as the
MTLa1 probe
(31). Northern blot
analyses were performed according to methods previously described
(31).
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Switch
phenotypes of primary colonies and switching frequencies computed from
secondary platings
|
![]() View larger version (52K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Core
switching system in C. glabrata. Cells switch spontaneously
among Wh, LB, DB, and vDB phenotypes discriminated on agar containing 1
mM CuSO4. In each box, low-magnification pictures of the
dominant phenotypes are presented with examples of switches (a and b in
parentheses). The frequencies of variant colony phenotypes are noted on
the arrows pointing to those variant
phenotypes.
|
(ii) Patient P2. In the case of patient P2, only the vagina was colonized. In both the vaginal-pool and vaginal-wall samples, 100% of the primary colonies exhibited the DB phenotype (Table 1).
(iii) Patient P3. In the case of patient P3, a dramatic difference was observed between the proportions of switch phenotypes in oral and vaginal isolates. Ninety-five and 93% of the primary colonies of the cheek and under-tongue samples, respectively, exhibited the Wh phenotype, and 5 and 7%, respectively, exhibited the DB phenotype (Table 1). Pictures of primary cultures from the cheek sample (Fig. 2A and B) and from the under-tongue sample (Fig. 2C and D) are presented. In marked contrast, only 3 and 2% of the primary colonies of the vaginal-pool and vaginal-wall samples, respectively, exhibited the Wh phenotype, while 97 and 98%, respectively, exhibited the DB phenotype (Table 1). Using Fisher's test, the difference between the proportions of phenotypes in the oral cavity and the vagina of patient P3 proved highly significant (P = 2 x 10-100). Pictures of primary cultures from the vaginal pool and vaginal wall are presented in Fig. 2E and F, respectively. Hence, while the dominant phenotype in the oral cavity of patient P3 was Wh, the dominant phenotype in the vagina was DB.
![]() View larger version (104K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. For
patient P3, the Wh phenotype dominated in the oral cavity (cheek and
under tongue), while the DB phenotype dominated in the vaginal canal
(vaginal wall and vaginal pool). The low-magnification images are of
primary colonies plated directly from the original samples (swabs). (A
and B) Primary colonies of cheek sample (the arrows point to minority
DB colonies). (C and D) Primary colonies of under-tongue sample (the
arrow points to a DB colony). (E) Primary colonies of
vaginal-pool sample. (F) Primary colonies of vaginal wall
sample.
|
Only one strain colonizes each patient. We assumed in the plating experiments that the cells colonizing the oral cavity and the vagina in the same patient represented a single strain and hence that cells exhibiting different switch phenotypes in the same anatomical location or the same host represented the same strain. To test this assumption, cells from primary colonies sampled from different body locations of the same patient and cells from different colony phenotypes were DNA fingerprinted by Southern blot hybridization with the complex species-specific probe Cg6 (12).
(i) Patient P1. Cells originating from a primary DB colony isolated from under the tongue, from primary DB and vDB colonies isolated from the vaginal pool, and from primary DB and vDB colonies isolated from the vaginal wall of patient P1 were DNA fingerprinted. All of the isolates exhibited similar patterns, but there were minor differences (Fig. 3A). The hybridization pattern of the DB isolate from under the tongue (DB-T) exhibited two major band differences from the patterns of the vaginal-wall and vaginal-pool isolates (Fig. 3A). However, when the isolates from patient P1 were compared with the patterns of the isolates from patients P2 and P3 in a dendrogram based on similarity coefficients, the oral and vaginal isolates of patient P1, including that of DB-T, clustered (Fig. 4), and when compared with the patterns of an additional collection of unrelated C. glabrata isolates, all of the patient P1 isolates still clustered as a single genetically related group (Fig. 5). No isolates from the general collection penetrated this group (Fig. 5). These results demonstrate that the isolates from the oral cavity and vagina of patient P1 represent the same strain of C. glabrata. These results also demonstrate that the major switch phenotypes DB and vDB in the primary samples represented the same strain. Finally, these results demonstrate that the strain colonizing patient P1 had undergone microevolution.
![]() View larger version (65K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Southern
blot hybridization with the DNA-fingerprinting probe Cg6 demonstrated
that only one strain of C. glabrata colonized each patient,
that the same strain colonized both the oral cavity and the vaginal
canal of each patient, and that the switch phenotypes represented the
same strain in each individual. 7549 is a reference strain for
normalization in computer-assisted analyses. T, under-tongue sample; C,
cheek sample; W, vaginal-wall sample; P, vaginal-pool sample. Wh1 and
Wh2 are two independent primary Wh colonies from the same patient. The
molecular masses on the left of the blots are in
kilodaltons. Note the examples of microevolution in DB-T of
patient P1, DB-P of patient P2, and Wh-P of patient
P3.
|
![]() View larger version (23K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Dendrogram
generated for the DNA-fingerprinted isolates of patients P1, P2, and
P3. To generate the dendrogram, the similarity coefficients between all
pairs of the DNA-fingerprinted patterns of isolates from patients P1,
P2, and P3 were computed. Note that the isolates from each patient form
a single cluster, indicating that each patient's collection
represented an independent single strain of C. glabrata. See
the legend to Fig. 3 for
an explanation of the isolate names. The dashed line represents the
average SAB computed among all isolate
pairs.
|
![]() View larger version (20K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Dendrogram
generated for the DNA-fingerprinted isolates from patients P1, P2, and
P3 and a large collection of unrelated C. glabrata isolates.
Note that even in this larger dendrogram, the clusters of P1, P2, and
P3 isolates remain intact, supporting the conclusion that each patient
is colonized by a single strain of C. glabrata.The dashed line represents the average SAB computed
among all isolate pairs for patients 1, 2, and
3.
|
(iii) Patient P3. Seven of eight primary Wh and DB isolates from the cheek (Wh1-C, Wh2-C, and DB-C), under the tongue (Wh-T and DB-T), the vaginal pool (DB-P), and the vaginal wall (Wh-W and DB-W) exhibited identical DNA fingerprinting patterns (Fig. 3C). One primary isolate (Wh-P) exhibited a pattern with two band differences (Fig. 3C). A secondary vDB colony emanating from a primary DB colony of the vaginal pool (vDB-P) had the same DNA fingerprint as the majority of isolates (Fig. 3C). When compared in mixed dendrograms to the patterns of isolates from the other two patients (Fig. 4) and when further compared to the patterns of the additional collection of unrelated isolates (Fig. 5), the P3 isolates coclustered, again demonstrating that they represented the same strain. These results also revealed microevolution.
Together, these results demonstrate that one strain colonized both the oral cavity and the vagina of each of the three patients, that the different colony phenotypes in the same host and in the same anatomical cavity of that host represent switch phenotypes of the same strain, and that there was microevolution in all three colonizing strains. The mixed dendrogram in Fig. 5 further revealed that relatively unrelated isolates of C. glabrata from different deep-rooted groups caused vaginal candidiasis and underwent switching between core phenotypes.
Switching characteristics of primary isolates. To confirm that multiple colony phenotypes in the same anatomical location or the same host were in fact the result of switching, we analyzed the switching characteristics of primary isolates. A mixture of cells from two individual primary colonies with the same switch phenotype and from the same anatomical location were plated onto agar containing 1 mM CuSO4, and the frequencies and types of the variant colonies formed were measured. In the case of patient P1, primary DB cells switched primarily to the vDB phenotype at frequencies ranging between 6.7 x 10-3 and 2.6 x 10-2 (Table 1). Primary vDB isolates switched to LB at lower frequencies of 6.2 x 10-4 to 8.7 x 10-4 (Table 1). An example of a switch from vDB to LB is presented in Fig. 6A. In the case of patient P2, primary DB cells switched primarily to vDB at frequencies ranging from 3.2 x 10-2 to 4.3 x 10-2 (Table 1). An example of a vDB sector in a DB colony is presented in Fig. 6B. In the case of patient P3, primary Wh cells switched to DB at frequencies ranging between 3.4 x 10-3 and 4.4 x 10-3, and primary DB cells switched to Wh at frequencies ranging between 1.2 x 10-3 and 5.2 x 10-3. Examples of switches from Wh to DB and from DB to Wh for cells from patient P3 are presented in Fig. 6C and D, respectively. To demonstrate that all cells are capable of switching, secondary colonies generated from cells of primary Wh colonies obtained from the under-tongue samples from patient P3 were plated and examined at different times. Early in development (6 days), the colonies were uniformly Wh (Fig. 6E), while later in development (12 days), each colony exhibited multiple sectors of the other variant phenotypes (Fig. 6F). Together, these results demonstrate that cells of all primary phenotypes switched spontaneously to other phenotypes in the core switching system and suggest that the multiple phenotypes in a patient arose through high-frequency, reversible phenotypic switching.
![]() View larger version (114K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Examples
of in vitro switching. Cells from primary colonies were replated
(secondary colonies). (A) Colonies from primary DB-VP
colonies of patient P1 (the arrowhead points to switch to vDB sector
and the arrow points to switch to LB colony). (B) Colonies
from primary DB-VP colonies of patient P2 (the arrow points to switch
to vDB sector). (C) Colonies from primary Wh-C colonies of
patient P3 (the arrow points to switch to DB colony). (D)
Colonies from primary DB-VP colonies of patient P3 (the arrow points to
switch to Wh). (E) Colonies from primary Wh-C colonies of
patient P3 secondary plating incubated for 6 days (note no visible
sectoring). (F) Colonies from primary Wh-C colonies of
patient P3 secondary plating incubated for 12 days (note sectoring in
every
colony).
|
2 ORF, referred to as the MTL
2
probe (Fig.
7A) (31). Each class
exhibited a distinct hybridization pattern with the
MTL
2 probe. For class I cells (reference strain
7549), which contained MTLa1 and MTLa2
at the putative expression locus MTL1, the
MTL
2 probe hybridized only to the MTL3 band;
for class II cells (reference strain PB921), which contained
MTL
1 and MTL
2 in the MTL1
locus, the MTL
2 probe hybridized to the MTL1
and MTL3 bands; and for class III cells (reference strain
J432285), which contained MTLa1 and
MTLa2 at the MTL1 locus, FuncP2 hybridized to
the MTL3 and MTL2 bands
(31) (Fig.
7A). To assess the mating
type class of the strains colonizing patients P1, P2, and P3, Southern
blots were probed with the MTL
2 probe for the same
sets of isolates that had been DNA fingerprinted with the complex probe
Cg6 (Fig. 3). Four of the
5 P1 isolates exhibited the class I pattern (Fig.
7B), all 4 of the P2
isolates exhibited the class II pattern (Fig.
7C), and all 10 of the P3
isolates exhibited the class I pattern. Hence, class I cells (patient
P1 and P3 strains) contained MTLa1 and
MTLa2 in their putative expression locus MTL1
and were therefore tentatively classified as mating type a
cells, while class II cells (patient P2 strain) contained
MTL
1 and MTL
2 in their expression
locus MTL1 and were therefore tentatively classified as mating
type
cells. These results, therefore, indicate that
pathogenesis (vaginal infection) is not limited to a single mating
type. The results also demonstrate that in each host, the majority of
cells exhibited the same mating type. The single exception was a vDB-P
isolate from patient P1 (Fig.
7B). This single isolate
exhibited a class II pattern, while the other four isolates from
patient P1 exhibited a class I pattern, suggesting a mating type switch
through gene conversion at the MTL1 locus. DNA fingerprinting
of vDB-P demonstrated that it was closely related to the other P1
isolates (Fig. 3C,
4, and
5), supporting the
conclusion that a mating type switch had occurred in the host at the
MTL1 locus. To verify both the mating type and mating type
switching, the Southern blots of the P1 isolates were hybridized first
with a probe unique to the MTL1a2 5' flanking
sequence and then with the MTLa1 ORF
(31). The probe for the
MTL1 locus hybridized to a single MTL1 band that was
of the same molecular weight in class I and class III isolates but of
slightly higher molecular weight in class II isolates due to the fact
that the MTL1
sequence is 185 bp longer
than the MTL1a sequence (Fig.
8A). The four class I isolates from patient P1 exhibited the class I
MTL1a band position, while the one class II isolate
from patient P1, vDB-P, exhibited the class II MTL1
band position (Fig. 8B).
The probe for MTLa1 hybridized with the MTL1
and MTL2 bands for all class I isolates with similar molecular
weights but with only the lower-molecular-weight MTL2 band for
the class II isolate (Fig.
8C),
indicating that a mating type switch had occurred at the
MTL1 locus. Because the majority of isolates from patient P1
were class I (a) while a minority were class II (
), one
might assume that the switch event was from a to
, but
the reverse could just as well have been the case if a had a
selective growth advantage.
![]() View larger version (65K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Southern
analysis of mating type classes reveals that infecting strains can be
a or and that mating type switching occurred in
patient P1. Southern blots of test isolates from each patient were
probed with FuncP2, an antisense oligonucleotide that binds to a unique
5' end sequence of the MTL 2 ORF. This
MTL 2-specific probe discriminates among the three
major classes of C. glabrata, class I (a), class II
( ), and class III (a)
(31). (A)
reference strains for the three classes representing the three
discriminating patterns. (B) isolates from patient P1.
(C) isolates from patient P2. (D) isolates from
patient P3. The mating type classes and MTL1 genotypes are
provided below the blots. Note that the prevailing patterns of the
isolates from patient P1, P2, and P3 are I (a), II ( ),
and I (a), respectively. Note also the single mating type switch
from class I to class II in isolate vDB-P of patient P1. In Fig.
3A, it was demonstrated by
Cg6 DNA fingerprinting that the five P1 isolates, including vDB-P,
represent the same strain. See the legend to Fig.
3 for an explanation of
the isolate names. The positions of MTL1, MTL2, and
MTL3 bands are noted to the right of the blots
(31).
|
![]() View larger version (40K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. Southern
blot hybridization analyses with probes for the MTL1 locus and
the MTLa1 ORF support the conclusion that a mating type
switch is responsible for the vDB-P pattern. (A) Reference
strain patterns for class I (a) and class II ( )
generated by Southern blot hybridization with a probe that specifically
binds to the MTL1a2 3' flanking sequence
(15). (B)
Southern blot hybridization patterns of primary P1 isolates with the
MTL1a2 3' flanking sequence probe.
(C) Reference strain patterns for classes I (a) and II
( ) generated by Southern blot hybridization with the
MTLa1 ORF probe. (D) Southern blot
hybridization patterns of primary P1 isolates with the
MTLa1 ORF probe. Note that in both cases the isolates
DB-T, DB-W, vDB-W, and DB-P exhibit the class I (a) pattern
while vDB-P exhibits the class II ( ) pattern. See
the legend to Fig. 3 for
explanations of isolate
names.
|
at the MTL1 locus resulted
in a change in mating type, the set of P1 isolates was analyzed for
MTLa and MTL
expression by Northern
analysis with an MTLa1-specific probe and an
MTL
1-specific probe. While the isolates that were
a at the MTL1 locus (vDB-T, DB-W, vDB-W, and DB-P)
expressed MTLa1 and not MTL
1, the one
isolate that was
at the MTL1 locus (vDB-P) expressed
MTL
1 and not MTLa1 (Fig.
9). These results demonstrate that the genetic switch at the MTL1
locus in the P1 strain resulted in a change in mating type
expression.
![]() View larger version (69K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 9. Northern
blot analyses with probes for MTLa1 and
MTL 1 transcripts reveal that the genetic switch from
a to at the MTL1 locus in vDB-P was
accompanied by a switch from MTLa1 to
MTL 1 expression. The expression patterns of the
strain 35B11 and the a strain 1480.47 are presented at
the end of the gel for reference. While isolates vDB-T, DB-W, vDB-W,
and DP-P, all a at the MTL1 locus, express
MTLa1 and not MTL 1, isolate vDB-P,
which is at the MTL1 locus, expresses
MTL 1 and not MTLa1. See the legend to
Fig. 3 for an explanation
of the isolate
names.
|
) were clonally plated. Fifty of these
colonies were then analyzed by Southern blot hybridization with FuncP2.
All exhibited the class I pattern of the original DB-P isolate (data
not shown). Cells of the DB-P isolate were then mass cultured through
200 generations in four separate flasks; the cells were pooled every 12
generations and analyzed by Southern blot hybridization with the
MTL
1 probe. The gels were exposed for various lengths
of time to monitor the appearance of the MTL
1
hybridization band of class II (Fig.
7A), which would indicate
a mating type switch from MTL1a to
MTL1
at the MTL1 locus. The sensitivity of
the overexposed gels would have identified one class II cell per 100 to
500 class I cells. No MTL1
band was observed (data
not shown), suggesting an extremely low in vitro frequency of switching
from class I to class II in DB-P
cells. |
|
|---|
Here, we provide evidence that the oral cavity and the vaginal canal can be colonized by different proportions of switch phenotypes of the same strain. In the case of patient P1, the primary sample from the oral cavity was composed entirely of cells exhibiting the DB phenotype, while the primary samples from the vaginal wall and vaginal pool were composed of 86% DB and 14% vDB. This difference was significant. If one applied to an initial homogeneous population of 100 DB cells of patient P1 a simple model based on the relatively high in vitro frequency of DB switching to vDB and the relatively low in vitro frequency of switching from vDB to DB, the population would reach the proportions observed in the primary vaginal isolates after only eight cell doublings and would continue to decrease in favor of vDB cells. The fact that we did not observe a single vDB colony in the primary plating of the oral-cavity sample from patient P1, and only 14% in the primary plating of the vaginal sample, indicates a strong selection bias for DB in the vaginal canal and an even stronger bias in the oral cavity or inhibition of switching from DB to vDB in both locations.
Because DB cells from patient P2 switched to vDB at relatively high frequencies in vitro, one would have expected the vaginal population of this patient to contain vDB cells. The primary vaginal samples from patient P2, however, were devoid of vDB cells. Similarly, the in vitro frequency of switching of DB cells from patient P3 to Wh was similar to the in vitro frequency of switching of Wh cells to DB, yet the oral cavity was dominated by the Wh phenotype while the vaginal canal was dominated by the DB phenotype. These results clearly demonstrate that the in vivo situation does not reflect in vitro frequencies of switching.
The results obtained with patient P3 samples suggest for the first time that both the oral cavity and the vaginal canal can select for different switch phenotypes of the same strain. There are several possible ways this could be achieved. First, selection could be through the differential inhibition of cell multiplication. The oral cavity would selectively inhibit DB cell multiplication, while the vaginal canal would selectively inhibit Wh cell multiplication. Second, selection could be the result of the nutrient compositions of the fluids in the two locations. While the oral cavity would provide nutrients that selectively support Wh cell multiplication, the vagina would selectively provide nutrients that support DB cell multiplication. In vitro analyses have revealed no differences in the growth rates of the core switch phenotypes in a synthetic medium (8), but observations of the nutrient requirements of the white and opaque phenotypes of C. albicans suggest that growth in rich synthetic medium may be irrelevant to the in vivo situation. Although white- and opaque-phase C. albicans cells exhibit similar growth rates in synthetic medium, they exhibit profound differences in their sugar assimilation patterns (22). Similar differences may prove to exist for the core switch phenotypes of C. glabrata. Third, selection could be due to differences in adhesion or the capacity to form biofilms on the surfaces of the different cavities. In C. albicans, it has been demonstrated that while white-phase cells do not colonize skin, opaque-phase cells are highly proficient (6). Hence, there is precedent for selective colonization of switch phenotypes. Finally, selection could be due to the in vivo inhibition of switching in one direction (e.g., inhibition of switching from DB to vDB). In C. albicans, a variety of environmental conditions have been identified that affect the frequency of switching, including temperature (19), oxidants (5), culture age (26), and low doses of UV (14). Particular anatomical locations may selectively or generally inhibit switching or induce switching in one direction. Experiments to identify the mechanisms for the phenotypic selection of switch phenotypes of C. glabrata in the oral cavity and vaginal canal are now in progress. In addition, we are pursuing the possibility that the DB phenotype, which dominated the site of infection in each of the three vaginitis patients, may be a more pathogenic phenotype, although it should be noted that DB did not cause infections in the oral cavity.
Finally, our results demonstrate that both class I and
class II cells, representing mating type a and
cells,
respectively, can cause similar vaginal infections and that one mating
type dominates in each colonizing strain. More interestingly, the
results from patient P1 revealed a mixture of mating type a
(class I; aa
) and mating type
(class II;
a
) cells in the vagina. Southern analysis
revealed that the differences in the distribution of MTL genes
at the MTL1 locus of the mating type a and
isolates was consistent with conserved gene replacement at the
MTL1 locus in a single strain. Northern analysis demonstrated
that this genetic change resulted in a change from MTLa
to MTL
expression. DNA fingerprinting of the strains
verified that the MTLa and MTL
isolates from patient P1 represented the same strain. These results
demonstrate for the first time a mating type switch at the
MTL1 locus. Furthermore, these results demonstrate that mating
type switching occurs at the site of colonization. Remarkably, mass
culturing of the mating type a isolate (class I;
aa
) through 200 generations in vitro did not result in
a switch to mating type
(class II;
a
), suggesting either that the strain
colonizing patient P1 had undergone far more than 200 generations in
vivo for a switch to have occurred or that mating type switching occurs
more frequently in vivo.
In conclusion, our analysis of the colonizing populations of C. glabrata in three vaginitis patients has revealed both high-frequency phenotypic switching and mating type switching in the host. Our results also suggest either that these processes do not occur at the same frequencies in vivo as they do in vitro or that host environments select for particular switch phenotypes or mating types. Finally, our results demonstrate for the first time that different phenotypes of the core switching system of a single strain can dominate different anatomical locations of the same host.
We are indebted to Karla Daniels for help with the figures.
Paula J. Brockert and Salil A. Lachke contributed equally to this work.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»