Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, February 2003, p. 663-670, Vol. 71, No. 2
0019-9567/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/IAI.71.2.663-670.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Division of Biology,1 Department of Diagnostic Medicine and Pathobiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 665062
Received 13 August 2002/ Returned for modification 8 October 2002/ Accepted 30 October 2002
|
|
|---|
in B10 x C2D mice. In addition, the course of inflammation following experimental Pasteurella challenge was altered in C2D recipients. C2D macrophages also protected B10 x C2D mice, which lack CD4+ T cells. These data indicate that macrophages are critical for pulmonary immunity and can provide host resistance to P. pneumotropica. This study indicates that TLR4-positive macrophages are important for early recognition and clearance of pulmonary bacterial infections. |
|
|---|
Alveolar macrophages are the first cells to encounter foreign microbes and particulates within the alveolus (11, 31). Alveolar macrophages can detect and destroy potential pathogens, recognize antigens, and produce proinflammatory cytokines to obviate microbial infection (8). Alveolar macrophages use proteins encoded in the germ line to recognize a wide variety of microbial molecules. One of these proteins is Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4). TLR4 is a trans-membrane receptor that is the primary recognition molecule of the macrophage in response to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) of gram-negative bacteria (4-6, 27). TLR4 is a pattern recognition receptor that recognizes conserved portions of microbial molecules termed pathogen-associated molecular patterns (17). The pattern recognition receptor-pathogen-associated molecular pattern interaction of TLR4 with LPS activates macrophages through the TLR4 signal transduction pathway and leads to NF-
B activation and the production of proinflammatory mediators (8).
Impaired immunity can lead to pulmonary infections by opportunistic bacteria. The TLR4Lps-del mouse strains C57BL10/ScN (B10) and STOCK Abbtm1 TLR4Lps-del Slc11a1s (B10 x C2D) are both susceptible to infection by the opportunistic gram-negative bacterium Pasteurella pneumotropica. These mice develop severe, and sometimes lethal, pneumonia when experimentally challenged with P. pneumotropica (9). In contrast, the major histocompatibility complex class II-null (MHCII-/-) and TLR4Lps-n mouse strain, C2D, is largely resistant in spite of the absence of CD4+ T cells. We have achieved long-term reconstitution of TLR4Lps-del mice with either TLR4-positive whole bone marrow or a macrophage cell line, C2D. (M. L Hart et al., submitted for publication). Adoptively transferred cells colonize areas that characteristically contain macrophages, including the lungs (33). Because the TLR4 gene controls macrophage activation and is necessary for protection against P. pneumotropica-induced pneumonia, we hypothesized that reconstitution of TLR4Lps-del mice with TLR4-positive macrophages would provide protection against this bacterium. This study shows that macrophages are the critical component necessary for resistance to experimental P. pneumotropica infection in mice.
|
|
|---|
gene and the targeted deletion of the IAß gene (15, 16). C2D mice were backcrossed five times to the B6 background, and the offspring of such are considered an incipient congenic strain (Jackson Laboratory notes, 2000). The C2D mouse has been brother-sister mated for more than 20 generations for 9 years. C57BL10/ScN (B10 MHCII+/+ TLR4Lps-del) mice were obtained from the animal resource facility at the National Institutes of Health, bred in the mouse facility at Kansas State University since 1995, and used as founders for the B10 x C2D recombinant stock. The B10 x C2D mice (STOCK Abbtm1 TLR4Lps-del Slc11a1s), created at Kansas State University were previously described (9, 34). Breeder mice were routinely genotyped for quality assurance. All mouse experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Kansas State University. |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Mouse strains used in this study
|
(ii) TLR4. B6, B10, and B10 x C2D mice were assessed for expression of TLR4 mRNA because black mice have a gene deletion that does not allow the mRNA expression (26, 28). For this assessment RT-PCR was performed and a mouse with the presence or absence of a 476-bp cDNA fragment was interpreted as a TLR4Lps-n mouse or TLR4Lps-del mouse, respectively. For this assessment the sense primers 5'-GTATATGTGAACATCAGAAATTCCT-3' and the antisense primer 5'-CATGTTTGAGCAATCTCATATTCAA-3' were utilized. The RT-PCR conditions were previously described (34).
C2D macrophage cell line. The C2D macrophage cell line was created by our group (3).
These cells were derived from C2D mouse bone marrow and selected in the presence of colony stimulating factor 1. After several crisis periods, the cells lost their dependence on colony stimulating factor 1, and the differentiated cells were characterized to have macrophage properties (3). These cells have the MHCII-/- and TLR4Lps-n genotype.
Adoptive transfer. (i) C2D whole bone marrow. Long bones were recovered from 6-week-old female C2D mice, and the marrow cavity was flushed with sterile heparin-phosphate-buffered saline (h-PBS; 100 U/ml) solution. Red blood cells were lysed in the cell suspension with 0.17 M NH4Cl. Cells were centrifuged and washed two times to remove serum components and resuspended in warm (37°C) sterile h-PBS solution. Mice received intraperitoneal (i.p.) injections of 2.0 x 107 cells per 500 µl of sterile h-PBS solution or intravenous injections through the lateral tail vein of 2.0 x 107 cells per mouse in 200 µl of h-PBS solution. Mice were rested for 7 days before experimentation.
(ii) C2D macrophage cell line. C2D macrophages were grown in 150-mm-diameter tissue culture plates in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% OptiMEM (vol/vol), 0.3% L-glutamine (wt/vol), and 10% serum (vol/vol). Cells were dispersed from confluent cultures with trypsin and washed three times from plates with sterile h-PBS. Mice received intravenous or i.p. injections as previously described and were rested for 7 days before experimentation.
Bacteria. P. pneumotropica was grown as previously described (9). Mice were intranasally infected with bacteria in log-phase growth by inducing gasping with exposure to a 50:50 carbon dioxide-oxygen mixture followed by the application of 25 µl of bacterial suspension (4.0 x 108 to 7.0 x 109 CFU per animal). Mice were monitored daily for the development of symptoms and were euthanized to assess lung infections at predetermined times.
Lung assessment and detection of P. pneumotropica. Mice were euthanized and the lungs were removed. The percentage of pneumonic tissue for each lung lobe was determined with the use of a dissection microscope and multiplied by 2 (left lobe), 1 (right superior and right inferior lobes), or 0.5 (right middle and postcaval lobe) to account for the relative contribution of each lobe to the total pulmonary mass. The total lesion score is the sum of the individual lung scores of all the mice in each strain tested (9). Bacterial infection was determined by assay for P. pneumotropica DNA isolated from lung tissue by PCR using the P. pneumotropica-specific primers 5'-CGGAATAACTGGGCGTAA-3' (upstream) and 5'-GTCTCCTTTGAGTTCCCGACC-3' (downstream) as previously described (9). Densitometric comparisons between P. pneumotropica DNA and the mammalian housekeeping gene S14 DNA were performed on ethidium bromide-stained agarose gels. Detection of P. pneumotropica in this manner correlates with lung bacterial isolate CFU determinations (r2 > 0.75) (9).
Detection of inflammatory cells in BAL fluid. Cells were collected by bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) from six mice per treatment group of infected B10 and B10 x C2D mice 24, 48, 72, 120, and 240 h postinfection. Mice were infected as described above, and lavage was performed by cannulation of each trachea with a blunt-end needle tied in place with surgical thread. Lungs were infused with 1 ml of EDTA-PBS (0.2 g/liter; 25°C) using a 1-ml syringe and gently massaged as previously described (9). Cytospins were prepared using 2.0 x 105 cells from the BAL. Cells were stained using Quick-Dif (Biochemical Sciences, Swedesboro, N.J.), and differential counts were determined by scoring a minimum of 200 cells. Uninfected B10 and B10 x C2D mice were used to establish baseline cell population percentages.
Peroxidase assays were performed using 2 x 105 cells per well in 96-well flat-bottom plates (Costar, Corning, N.Y.). The presence of peroxidase was determined by addition of TM Blue (50 µl/well; INTERGEN, Milford, Mass.). The color reaction was allowed to develop approximately 10 min, 1 N HCl (50 µl/well) was added to stop the reaction, and plates were read using a Spectra Count apparatus (Packard Instrument Companies, Meriden, Conn.).
Detection of chemokines and cytokines.
Total RNA was extracted from cells using TRIzol according to the manufacturer's directions (Invitrogen). cDNA was amplified using primers specific for each chemokine. These were sense (5'-GGGATGAGAAGTTCCCAAATG-3') and antisense (5'-CTCCAGCTGGAAGACTCCTCCCAG-3') primers for tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-
) (436-bp product), sense (5'-CTCACCTGCTGCTACTCATTC-3') and antisense (5'-GCTTGAGGTGGTTGTGGAAAA-3') primers for JE (318-bp product), sense (5'-GCATTCAGTTCCAGGTCAGTG-3') and antisense (5'-CCCAGCCAGGTGCATTTTCC-3') primers for macrophage inflammatory protein 1
(MIP-1
) (102-bp product), sense (5'-AGTTTGCCTTGACCCTGAAGCC-3') and antisense (5'-TGGGTGGGATGTAGCTAGTTCC-3') primers for MIP-2 (465-bp product), and sense (5'-AACGGAGAAAGAAGACAGACTGCT-3') and antisense (5'-GACGAGACCAGGAGAAACAGGG-3') primers for KC (529-bp product). PCR conditions remained as previously described for MHCII screening. Densitometric comparisons between chemokine DNA and the ß-actin DNA were performed on ethidium bromide-stained 2% agarose gels.
Statistics. Differences between treatment groups were determined using the indicated test analyses with the StatMost statistical package (Dataxiom, Los Angeles, Calif.).
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Assessment of P. pneumotropica-induced lung damage following adoptive transfer of C2D whole bone marrow to B10 mice
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Assessment of P. pneumotropica-induced lung damage following adoptive transfer of C2D macrophages to B10 mice
|
23% survival in control groups (P < 0.01; Table 4). In contrast, mice receiving C2D macrophages had an 85% survival rate (Table 4). The higher survival rate of B10 x C2D mice to whom we had adoptively transferred C2D macrophages was consistent with our findings in B10 mice and indicates that both whole bone marrow and C2D macrophages can protect mice in the absence of CD4+ T cells. |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 4. Survival of B10 x C2D mice after adoptive transfer and P. pneumotropica challenge
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 5. Survival of B10 x C2D mice 60 days post-C2D macrophage adoptive transfer with P. pneumotropica challenge
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 6. Inflammatory cells present in BAL fluid of B10 mice with C2D whole bone marrow or C2D macrophage adoptive transfer and P. pneumotropica challenge
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 7. Inflammatory cells present in BAL fluid of B10 x C2D mice with C2D whole bone marrow or C2D macrophage adoptive transfer and P. pneumotropica challenge
|
![]() View larger version (29K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Peroxidase concentration in BAL fluids of B10 and B10 x C2D mice after adoptive transfer with whole bone marrow or C2D macrophages and intranasal P. pneumotropica challenge after a 7-day rest period. Lungs were washed with PBS-EDTA, and peroxidase levels were measured using substrate conversion with TM Blue. (A) Peroxidase concentration in BAL fluids of B10 mice; (B) peroxidase concentration in BAL fluids of B10 x C2D mice. Error bars, standard deviations.
|
in response to the in vivo environment (Hart et al., submitted). We hypothesized that the production of cytokines by C2D macrophages may have a direct impact on the transcription of chemokines and cytokines of host macrophages. Mice to whom we had adoptively transferred C2D macrophages were challenged with P. pneumotropica, the lungs were harvested at various time points, and cytokine transcription was determined by RT-PCR. A densitometric ratio was determined as described in Materials and Methods. JE and MIP-2 were transcribed earlier in adoptive-transfer B10 and B10 x C2D mice compared to control mice (Fig. 2 and 3). Similarly, TNF-
transcription levels increased sooner in mice that received adoptive transfer compared to non-adoptive-transfer mice. KC and MIP-1
were also transcribed earlier in B10 x C2D mice that received C2D macrophage transfer compared to non-adoptive-transfer controls (Fig. 3). However, similar differences were not apparent in B10 mice. Therefore, adoptively transferred C2D macrophages may impact host inflammatory responsiveness by altering the production of chemokines and cytokines in the lung.
![]() View larger version (31K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Cytokine transcription in the lungs of B10 mice. Mice were euthanized at various times following bacterial challenge. Lungs were removed, and RNA was collected. Cytokine transcription levels were determined semiquantitatively using cytokine-specific primers, and a densitometric ratio (cytokine product/ß-actin product) was determined. Error bars, standard deviations.
|
![]() View larger version (29K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Cytokine transcription in the lungs of B10 x C2D mice. Mice were euthanized at various times following bacterial challenge. Lungs were removed, and RNA was collected. Cytokine transcription levels were determined semiquantitatively using cytokine-specific primers, and a densitometric ratio (cytokine product/ß-actin product) was determined. Error bars, standard deviations.
|
|
|
|---|
Adoptively transferred C2D macrophages do not cause inflammation or upset normal alveolar macrophage distribution. The absence of detrimental pathology allows long-term survival of C2D cells in vivo (greater than 2 months) with a continued contribution to host resistance (Hart et al., submitted). Our study conclusively demonstrates that macrophages adapted to long-term in vitro culture can be reintroduced in vivo and contribute significantly to host resistance.
The adoptive transfer of C2D macrophages affects pulmonary inflammation. Mice given C2D macrophages had fewer neutrophils in the alveoli than control mice at 24 h postinfection (P < 0.05). Although the presence of polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) at 24 h correlated with increased peroxidase activity of lung lavage cells, there was decreased peroxidase at later times in B10 mice in spite of the presence of PMNs in the BAL. This suggests that immigration of fresh PMNs diminished and that older degranulated PMNs remained in the alveoli of B10 mice. There was a better correlation between PMNs and peroxidase activation in B10 x C2D mice, where it took several weeks for PMN removal. The return to normal baseline cell concentrations occurred faster in protected mice to whom cells had been adoptively transferred. Therefore, C2D macrophages probably limited the infection and ameliorated the intensity of subsequent inflammation. Moreover, the presence of CD4+ T cells seems to limit inflammation by PMN. It would appear that in the normal situation, both T cells and macrophages work to limit infection.
C2D macrophages may enhance host resistance because they produce some cytokines (3). C2D macrophages constitutively transcribe the chemokines JE and KC, and transcription is enhanced with LPS stimulation (Hart et al., submitted). This is consistent with the heightened expression of these early chemokines in thioglycolate-elicited peritoneal macrophages (36). Administration of human monocyte-chemotactic and activating factor, a homologue of murine JE, enhances mouse survival after experimental challenge with Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (23). In vitro and in vivo experiments demonstrated that administration of monocyte-chemotactic and activating factor enhanced phagocytosis and bactericidal activity in a dose-dependent manner (23). Therefore, early expression of JE by adoptively transferred C2D macrophages may stimulate recipient immunity. This hypothesis is supported by our observation that C2D macrophages accelerated the kinetics of in vivo lung cytokine production after infection. Perhaps this early burst of activity is the key to limiting infection. In addition, we previously showed that C2D macrophages transcribe TNF-
after exposure to the in vivo microenvironment (Hart et al., submitted), even though in vitro-cultured cells make little TNF-
(3). Production of TNF-
by adoptively transferred C2D macrophages could also directly stimulate recipient macrophages and influence subsequent resistance. It may be a combination of cytokine production by adoptively transferred macrophages and recipient responses that accounts for the effective resistance in susceptible mouse strains. Additional studies will be necessary to isolate the key components of resistance after adoptive transfer.
Many groups have adoptively transferred macrophages for the treatment of disease (1, 10, 12, 18, 25). Freudenberg et al. demonstrated that bone marrow-derived macrophages could restore a lethal LPS response in C3H/HeJ mice (12) and proved that reconstitution of macrophage function was possible using adoptive transfer. Nevertheless, there are few data on long-term host reconstitution with established macrophage cell lines. In one study J774A.1 macrophages, transfected with murine gamma interferon and enhanced fluorescent green protein, partially restored pulmonary immune function of SCID mice (35). However, the transfected macrophages had decreased expression of murine gamma interferon and enhanced fluorescent green protein over time, suggesting that J774.1 transfer did not offer long-term protection. Similarly, Nishihara et al. found that their macrophage cell line only functioned for 20 days in vivo (24).
A common complication of adoptive transfer of macrophage cell lines is neoplasia. Macrophage cell lines continuously grown in culture are not growth factor regulated and can be tumorigenic (2, 29). Introduction of a simian virus 40-transformed macrophage cell line into both B6 and Aß knockout mice caused progressively growing tumors in both mouse strains (3). Therefore, the nontumorigenic cell line, C2D macrophages, offer a unique tool for long-term in vivo studies.
The ability of C2D macrophages to restore host resistance to P. pneumotropica reaffirms the important role of macrophages in pulmonary health. Since both whole bone marrow and C2D macrophages are MHCII-/- and can protect B10 x C2D mice in the absence of CD4+ T cells, activation through MHCII or by helper T cells is not as important as stimulation through the TLR4 pathway. The more-dramatic effects of C2D macrophages on B10 x C2D mice, compared to B10 mice, probably reflect the reversal of a more-dramatic immunodeficiency and effectively demonstrates that macrophages alone restore host resistance to P. pneumotropica. However, the more-efficient clearance of P. pneumotropica in B10 mice compared to B10 x C2D mice with or without adoptive transfer shows the contribution of helper T cells in normal host resistance. Reintroduction of TLR4-positive macrophages may be one method for prevention and treatment of persistent pulmonary gram-negative bacterial infections.
Although macrophage therapy may prove beneficial for some bacterial infections, it may not be universally effective. For example, Lettinga et al. found that TLR4 was not important for pulmonary resistance against the gram-negative bacterium Legionella pneumophila (20). Leemans et al. found that the presence of normal macrophages not only facilitated capture of Mycobacterium tuberculosis but also the growth of the bacilli (19). Depletion of alveolar macrophages resulted in a modicum of pulmonary protection (19). Therefore, the complex role of alveolar macrophages and TLR4 may be dependent on the type of bacteria present in the pulmonary environment. P. pneumotropica is a pyogenic, extracellular bacterium. L. pneumophila and M. tuberculosis grow intracellularly. The ability of C2D macrophages to effectively restore host immunity appears to be dependent on the presence of TLR4, cellular activation through this pathway, and the subsequent production of cytokines. Further research should explore the full protective potential of C2D macrophages against both intracellular and extracellular microorganisms.
This work was supported by The Kansas NASA Space Grant Consortium; NASA grants NAGW-1197, NAG2-1274, and NCC5-168; U.S. Department of Agriculture Animal Health Funds section 1433, grant 4-81895; and NIH grants RR16475 and AI050785.
This is publication number 03-12-J of the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»