Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, March 2003, p. 1551-1556, Vol. 71, No. 3
0019-9567/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/IAI.71.3.1551-1556.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Scott S. Grieshaber,1,
and Robert A. Heinzen1*
Department of Molecular Biology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming 82071-3944,1 Cell Motility Laboratory, Cancer Research UK, London, United Kingdom2
Received 1 October 2002/ Returned for modification 26 November 2002/ Accepted 13 December 2002
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| TEXT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There is a paucity of information on regulators of R. rickettsii ABM. However, the actin polymerization machinery that promotes motility of Listeria, Shigella, and vaccinia virus is reasonably well described and is comprised of both pathogen and host proteins (reviewed in references 9 and 10). Neuronal Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein (N-WASP) and the actin-related protein 2/3 (Arp2/3) complex of proteins are critical host proteins that regulate ABM (10). The Arp2/3 complex consists of two actin-related proteins (Arp2 and Arp3) and five additional protein subunits and is the only known cellular factor that nucleates polymerization of actin filaments that grow from their fast-growing barbed ends (16, 29). N-WASP, which normally couples surface receptor stimulation with actin polymerization, is a member of the WASP family of proteins that in mammals also includes WASP and three isoforms of the suppressor of cyclic AMP receptor (Scar) (3, 18, 28). The actin assembly activity of the Arp2/3 complex is activated upon binding of activated N-WASP (18, 28). N-WASP contains a number of functional domains, some of which bind effector molecules involved in N-WASP activation. A centrally located Cdc42/Rac interactive binding motif (CRIB) and a basic region adjacent to CRIB act as ligands for Cdc42 and phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate [PI(4,5)P2], respectively (28, 32). The C-terminal VCA domain (for "verprolin homology, cofilin homology, and acidic domains"; called WA for WASP homology 2 and acidic domains in Scar) of unfolded N-WASP binds the Arp2/3 complex and stimulates its actin-nucleating activity (18, 41). Additional functional domains of N-WASP include a proline-rich central domain, which binds profilin and Src homology domain 3-containing proteins such as the adaptor protein Nck1 (9, 26), and the N-terminal Wiskott-Aldrich homology 1 (WH1) domain, which mediates interactions with calmodulin, PI(4,5)P2, actin filaments, and a WASP-regulating protein termed WASP-interacting protein (5, 19, 23, 31). N-WASP is synergistically activated by binding PI(4,5)P2 and GTP-bound Cdc42 (32). Binding relieves the intramolecular interactions between the C-terminal VCA domain and the basic-region, CRIB, and WH1 domains, promoting a conformational change from an autoinhibited, folded state to an active, unfolded state (32).
N-WASP is directly recruited to Shigella by the bacterial surface protein IcsA (35). Binding to IcsA causes N-WASP to undergo a conformational change to an active form reminiscent of Cdc42 activation (3, 5). Tyrosine phosphorylation of the vaccinia virus protein A36R results in stepwise recruitment of the SH2/SH3 adaptor protein Nck1, WASP-interacting protein, and N-WASP (8, 26), with recruitment of the adaptor Grb2 downstream of N-WASP also occurring (33). In each case, activated N-WASP recruits the Arp2/3 complex and activates its actin-nucleating activity, with actin tail formation and motility ensuing. Listeria circumvents a need for N-WASP by synthesizing ActA, which can directly bind and activate the Arp2/3 complex in an N-WASP-like manner (2, 38, 39). Thus, these three pathogens employ unique forms of "molecular mimicry" to activate critical regulators of the actin cytoskeleton to promote ABM: Shigella mimics Cdc42 activation of N-WASP, Listeria mimics N-WASP activation of the Arp2/3 complex, and vaccinia virus mimics receptor tyrosine kinase signaling (9).
A previous study by Gouin and coworkers (11) demonstrated by immunofluorescence that the related organism R. conorii also does not recruit N-WASP or Arp3. A potential caveat is that N-WASP and Arp2/3 complex may be recruited by rickettsiae but are beyond the limit of immunofluorescent detection (4). Given the universal requirement for N-WASP (or an N-WASP mimic such as ActA) and the Arp2/3 complex in pathogen ABM, we wished to further investigate similar requirements in R. rickettsii motility using a functional assay. In this study, functional domains of N-WASP tagged with green fluorescent protein (GFP) that have characterized effects on Shigella and vaccinia virus ABM were expressed in HeLa cells infected with R. rickettsii (26). The effect of expression on rickettsial ABM was determined by comparing the rate of motility in expressing cells to that in nonexpressing cells.
R. rickettsii (HLP strain) and Shigella flexneri 2457T (a generous gift from Anthony Maurelli, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences) were used in these studies. Transfections were conducted with infected HeLa cells (CCL-2.1; American Type Culture Collection) because in our hands they are easily transfected and infected with both Shigella and Rickettsia. Petri dishes (35-mm-coverslip bottom; MatTek Corp., Ashland, Mass.) were seeded with HeLa cells to semiconfluence and cultivated overnight at 37°C in M199 medium (Life Technologies, Grand Island, N.Y.) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Life Technologies) and 10 µg of gentamicin (Life Technologies) per ml. Rickettsiae suspended in 3.7% brain heart infusion broth (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.) were used to infect monolayers at a multiplicity of infection of 0.1 to 1.0 for 45 min. The inoculum was removed, cells were washed once with Hanks' buffered saline solution (Life Technologies), M199 medium supplemented with 2% FBS was added, and incubation was continued at 34°C. For infection of HeLa cells with S. flexneri, organisms were cultivated overnight at 38.5°C in tryptic soy broth (TSB; Difco Laboratories), diluted 100-fold in TSB, and incubated for an additional 2 to 3 h at 38.5°C. Five hundred microliters of suspended bacteria was added to petri dishes, and the dishes were then centrifuged at 900 x g for 12 min at room temperature to facilitate infection. Infected HeLa cells were incubated for 1 h, washed three times with Hanks' buffered saline solution, M199 containing 2% FBS and gentamicin sulfate (75 µg/ml; to kill extracellular shigellae) was added, and incubation was continued at 37°C.
Transfections were conducted by using Lipofectamine and methods suggested by the supplier (Life Technologies). Due to the low growth rate of rickettsia, HeLa cells were infected with R. rickettsii for 2 to 4 days prior to transfection. Rickettsial infection and expression of GFP constructs were then allowed to proceed for an additional 1 to 2 days before microscopy. HeLa cells were transfected 24 h before infection with Shigella, which was continued for 3 h before microscopy. A schematic of the N-WASP-encoding plasmids used in this study is presented in Fig. 1. Their construction has been described elsewhere (26).
|
As reported by others (26), GFP fused to full-length N-WASP localized to one pole of intracellular S. flexneri organisms (Fig. 2). Conversely, this protein was not recruited by R. rickettsii (Fig. 2), which was also the case for all N-WASP constructs employed in this study (data not shown). Expression moderately inhibited the rate of ABM of both pathogens, with Shigella and Rickettsia organisms moving at 75 and 87%, respectively, of the rate of bacteria in nonexpressing cells. (The effects of expression of all N-WASP functional domains on Shigella and Rickettsia ABM are summarized in Table 1.) Inhibition of Shigella actin tail formation by expression of GFP fused to wild-type N-WASP has been reported (26).
|
|
VCA). This truncated form of N-WASP is recruited like the wild-type protein but is unable to bind the Arp2/3 complex and activate its actin-nucleating activity. It consequently behaves as a dominant-negative form of N-WASP (6, 26). Expression of
VCA inhibits both N-WASP-mediated endocytosis of invasive bacteria (1, 6, 22) and actin tail formation of vaccinia virus and Shigella (26). Ectopically expressed
VCA was recruited by Shigella (data not shown) and completely inhibited ABM in all expressing cells. In contrast, a moderate inhibitory effect on R. rickettsii motility was observed, with organisms in expressing cells moving at 61% of the rate of organisms in nonexpressing cells. Because R. rickettsii does not recruit N-WASP or
VCA, the moderate inhibition of rickettsial ABM by both proteins may be due to sequestration of N-WASP binding proteins that regulate rickettsial motility in an N-WASP-independent fashion. Expression of the N-WASP CRIB region also severely inhibited the rate of Shigella ABM, with no motility observed in 69.2% of expressing cells. In the remaining expressing cells, Shigella moved at 49% of the rate of organisms in nonexpressing cells. The null-to-partial Shigella motility phenotype associated with this and other N-WASP constructs was likely due to variable expression of the transgene between transfected cells (26). A similar effect was observed upon expression of CRIB containing an H-to-D mutation at amino acid 208 (CRIB H208D), which does not bind activated GTP-bound Cdc42 (24). No motility was observed in 76.9% of expressing cells, while in the remaining expressing cells Shigella moved at 40% of the rate of organisms in nonexpressing cells. Expression of WH1-CRIB inhibited Shigella ABM to a lesser degree than CRIB and CRIB H208D, with no motility observed in 50.0% of expressing cells. In the remaining expressing cells, Shigella moved at 74% of the rate of organisms in nonexpressing cells. CRIB, CRIB H208D, and WH1-CRIB were recruited by Shigella (data not shown), presumably via IcsA-CRIB interactions (26). Their inhibitory effects have been attributed to inhibition of recruitment of endogenous N-WASP (15, 26). Because CRIB also contains a binding motif for the N-WASP effector Cdc42, a Rho-family GTPase involved in N-WASP activation, cytosolic expression of CRIB or WH1-CRIB could also conceivably inhibit Shigella ABM by sequestering Cdc42. However, a growing body of evidence suggests that Cdc42 activation of N-WASP is not required for Shigella ABM (14, 15, 27, 34). Expression of CRIB, but not of CRIB H208D or WH1-CRIB, moderately inhibited the rate of rickettsial ABM, with organisms in expressing cells moving at 87% of the rate of those in nonexpressing cells. The observation that CRIB is not recruited by Rickettsia, in conjunction with the lack of inhibition by CRIB H208D, may suggest a role for Cdc42 signaling in rickettsial ABM, although additional studies are needed to define functions for this and other Rho-family GTPases.
The rate of Shigella and Rickettsia ABM was not significantly inhibited by expression of the N-WASP polyproline-rich region (poly-Pro), nor was the protein recruited by either bacterium. This proline-rich motif can act as a ligand for the actin monomer-sequestering protein profilin and Src homology domain 3-containing proteins (9). While not essential for Shigella ABM, profilin increases the rate of movement in cell-free reconstitution assays (14). A functional role for profilin in rickettsial ABM has not been established, although the protein localizes throughout the rickettsial actin tail (37). Ectopically expressed poly-Pro would be expected to sequester profilin and make it less accessible for ABM. In fact, microinjection of the oligoproline peptide (GPPPPP)3 corresponding to the profilin binding motif of VASP inhibits Shigella ABM in PtK2 cells, presumably by sequestering profilin (42). We anticipated that cytosolic expression of poly-Pro would have a similar effect. The lack of inhibition of both Shigella and Rickettsia ABM may indicate that this GFP fusion protein does not efficiently sequester profilin.
In contrast to results with poly-Pro, N-WASP missing the proline-rich domain (
poly-Pro) was recruited by Shigella, and expression moderately inhibited ABM, with organisms in expressing cells moving at 66% of the rate of those in nonexpressing cells. These findings are in keeping with recent studies that demonstrated recruitment by Shigella of similar N-WASP poly-Pro constructs that result in deficient actin tail formation (15, 25). In these studies, the actin tail deficiency was attributed to the lack of profilin recruitment (15, 25), although a recent report suggests that profilin augmentation of Shigella ABM is independent of binding to the N-WASP polyproline region (5). Expression of
poly-Pro did not inhibit rickettsial ABM, nor was the protein recruited by Rickettsia. Unless activated,
poly-Pro should reside in a folded, autoinhibited state that does not activate the Arp2/3 complex.
Expression of the WH1 domain of N-WASP did not significantly inhibit the rate of Shigella or Rickettsia ABM. However, the protein was recruited by Shigella (data not shown). WH1 recruitment by Shigella has been described, and the domain has been speculated to augment CRIB-mediated binding to IcsA (15).
When ectopically expressed, the VCA domain of WASP family proteins sequesters the Arp2/3 complex to result in delocalized activation of its actin-nucleating activity. It therefore has a dominant-negative effect with respect to Arp2/3 complex function by preventing recruitment and focalized activation by endogenous WASP family members (17, 18, 26). Expression of VCA inhibits actin tail formation of Shigella and vaccinia virus (26) and completely inhibits intracellular motility of Listeria (21). VCA also inhibits Fc
R- and CR3-promoted phagocytosis (20) as well as parasite-directed endocytosis (1, 6, 22). In keeping with previous work (26), expression of VCA had a severe inhibitory effect on Shigella ABM, with no motility observed in 78.9% of expressing cells. In the remaining expressing cells, Shigella organisms moved at 41% of the rate of organisms in nonexpressing cells. Recruitment of VCA by Shigella was not observed (data not shown). A moderate inhibitory effect on the rate of R. rickettsii ABM was observed in HeLa cells expressing VCA, with organisms in expressing cells moving at 67% of the rate of those in nonexpressing cells. This inhibitory effect of VCA was likely indirect and not due to inhibition of recruitment of the Arp2/3 complex by rickettsia. Rather, the actin-nucleating machinery associated with rickettsial ABM is likely deficient in competing for the monomeric actin pool with delocalized and activated Arp2/3 complex, thereby lowering the rate of tail formation and movement (17, 20). Consistent with these results is the observation that Arp3 localized to the bacterium-tail interface of S. flexneri but not R. rickettsii (Fig. 3).
|
WH1) did not significantly inhibit ABM of Shigella. This N-WASP deletion protein activates the Arp2/3 complex in a fashion similar to VCA and therefore likely exists in an unfolded, activated state (18, 26). The lack of
WH1 inhibition of Shigella motility is attributable to CRIB-mediated recruitment and utilization of this protein by Shigella in a fashion similar to wild-type N-WASP (15). Consistent with this hypothesis is the observation that
WH1, like full-length N-WASP and all CRIB-containing proteins, localized to the actin-polymerizing pole of intracellular Shigella (data not shown). Moreover, Lommel et al. (15) demonstrated that a similar N-WASP construct rescues actin tail formation in an N-WASP-deficient cell line. As for VCA, expression of
WH1 moderately inhibited ABM of Rickettsia, with organisms in expressing cells moving at 45% of the rate of those in nonexpressing cells. The greater inhibition of rickettsial motility by
WH1 over the VCA domain may be due to sequestration of other N-WASP effector molecules (e.g., Cdc42), in addition to delocalized Arp2/3 activation and depletion of the monomer actin pool.
In summary, the results of this study suggest that maintenance of R. rickettsii ABM does not require N-WASP or Arp2/3 complex activity. Independence from N-WASP signaling is most clearly supported by the lack of recruitment of all N-WASP domains, in addition to the moderate inhibition of rickettsial ABM by
VCA, the dominant-negative form of N-WASP, which completely inhibits Shigella ABM. The mechanism of moderate inhibition of rickettsial ABM by
VCA is unknown, but it may involve sequestration of N-WASP binding proteins, such as Cdc42 and profilin, that affect rickettsial motility in an N-WASP-independent fashion. Future studies using null cell lines and specific inhibitors of N-WASP effector molecules should further define the host cell requirements for rickettsial ABM.
Independence of R. rickettsii ABM from Arp2/3 complex actin-nucleating activity is supported by the moderate inhibition of rickettsial ABM by VCA, which severely and completely inhibits motility of Shigella (this study) and Listeria (21), respectively. Moreover, R. rickettsii does not recruit Arp3. The inhibition of rickettsial ABM by VCA is likely due to depletion of the polymerizable monomer actin pool by untargeted and activated Arp2/3 complex (17, 20). The actin-nucleating machinery associated with rickettsial motility may be deficient in competing for the monomeric actin pool, thereby slowing tail formation and movement. This hypothesis is consistent with the fact that rickettsiae move substantially more slowly than shigellae and listeriae (10) and are therefore likely to be less efficient at nucleating actin than these pathogens. Further evidence against a role for the Arp2/3 complex in rickettsial ABM is that actin filaments of R. rickettsii and R. conorii actin tails lack the dendritic side branching characteristic of Arp2/3 complex activity (11, 16, 37). Zyxin and the formans have recently been shown to nucleate the production of unbranched filaments (7, 30). Whether either protein is involved in rickettsial ABM remains to be determined. The possibility that Rickettsia produces an actin nucleator that promotes the synthesis of unbranched filaments also exists.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant AI-43502 (R.A.H.).
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Present address: Laboratory of Intracellular Parasites, Rocky Mountain Laboratories, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Hamilton, MT 59840. ![]()
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Alrutz, M. A., A. Srivastava, K. W. Wong, C. D'Souza-Schorey, M. Tang, L. E. Ch'Ng, S. B. Snapper, and R. R. Isberg. 2001. Efficient uptake of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis via integrin receptors involves a Rac1-Arp 2/3 pathway that bypasses N-WASP function. Mol. Microbiol. 42:689-703.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 2. | Boujemaa-Paterski, R., E. Gouin, G. Hansen, S. Samarin, C. Le Clainche, D. Didry, P. Dehoux, P. Cossart, C. Kocks, M. F. Carlier, and D. Pantaloni. 2001. Listeria protein ActA mimics WASp family proteins: it activates filament barbed end branching by Arp2/3 complex. Biochemistry 40:11390-11404.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 3. | Caron, E. 2002. Regulation of Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein and related molecules. Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol. 14:82-87.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 4. | Cossart, P. 2000. Actin-based motility of pathogens: the Arp2/3 complex is a central player. Cell. Microbiol. 2:195-205.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 5. | Egile, C., T. P. Loisel, V. Laurent, R. Li, D. Pantaloni, P. J. Sansonetti, and M. F. Carlier. 1999. Activation of the CDC42 effector N-WASP by the Shigella flexneri IcsA protein promotes actin nucleation by Arp2/3 complex and bacterial actin-based motility. J. Cell Biol. 146:1319-1332. |
| 6. | Elliott, D. A., D. J. Coleman, M. A. Lane, R. C. May, L. M. Machesky, and D. P. Clark. 2001. Cryptosporidium parvum infection requires host cell actin polymerization. Infect. Immun. 69:5940-5942. |
| 7. | Fradelizi, J., V. Noireaux, J. Plastino, B. Menichi, D. Louvard, C. Sykes, R. M. Golsteyn, and E. Friederich. 2001. ActA and human zyxin harbour Arp2/3-independent actin-polymerization activity. Nat. Cell Biol. 3:699-707.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 8. | Frischknecht, F., V. Moreau, S. Rottger, S. Gonfloni, I. Reckmann, G. Superti-Furga, and M. Way. 1999. Actin-based motility of vaccinia virus mimics receptor tyrosine kinase signalling. Nature 401:926-929.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 9. | Frischknecht, F., and M. Way. 2001. Surfing pathogens and the lessons learned for actin polymerization. Trends Cell Biol. 11:30-38.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 10. | Goldberg, M. B. 2001. Actin-based motility of intracellular microbial pathogens. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 65:595-626. |
| 11. | Gouin, E., H. Gantelet, C. Egile, I. Lasa, H. Ohayon, V. Villiers, P. Gounon, P. J. Sansonetti, and P. Cossart. 1999. A comparative study of the actin-based motilities of the pathogenic bacteria Listeria monocytogenes, Shigella flexneri and Rickettsia conorii. J. Cell Sci. 112:1697-1708.[Abstract] |
| 12. | Heinzen, R. A., S. S. Grieshaber, L. S. Van Kirk, and C. J. Devin. 1999. Dynamics of actin-based movement by Rickettsia rickettsii in Vero cells. Infect. Immun. 67:4201-4207. |
| 13. | Heinzen, R. A., S. F. Hayes, M. G. Peacock, and T. Hackstadt. 1993. Directional actin polymerization associated with spotted fever group rickettsia infection of Vero cells. Infect. Immun. 61:1926-1935. |
| 14. | Loisel, T. P., R. Boujemaa, D. Pantaloni, and M. F. Carlier. 1999. Reconstitution of actin-based motility of Listeria and Shigella using pure proteins. Nature 401:613-616.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 15. | Lommel, S., S. Benesch, K. Rottner, T. Franz, J. Wehland, and R. Kuhn. 2001. Actin pedestal formation by enteropathogenic Escherichia coli and intracellular motility of Shigella flexneri are abolished in N-WASP-defective cells. EMBO Rep. 2:850-857.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 16. | Machesky, L. M., and K. L. Gould. 1999. The Arp2/3 complex: a multifunctional actin organizer. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 11:117-121.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 17. | Machesky, L. M., and R. H. Insall. 1998. Scar1 and the related Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein, WASP, regulate the actin cytoskeleton through the Arp2/3 complex. Curr. Biol. 8:1347-1356.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 18. | Machesky, L. M., R. D. Mullins, H. N. Higgs, D. A. Kaiser, L. Blanchoin, R. C. May, M. E. Hall, and T. D. Pollard. 1999. Scar, a WASp-related protein, activates nucleation of actin filaments by the Arp2/3 complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:3739-3744. |
| 19. | Martinez-Quiles, N., R. Rohatgi, I. M. Anton, M. Medina, S. P. Saville, H. Miki, H. Yamaguchi, T. Takenawa, J. H. Hartwig, R. S. Geha, and N. Ramesh. 2001. WIP regulates N-WASP-mediated actin polymerization and filopodium formation. Nat. Cell Biol. 3:484-491.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 20. | May, R. C., E. Caron, A. Hall, and L. M. Machesky. 2000. Involvement of the Arp2/3 complex in phagocytosis mediated by Fc R or CR3. Nat. Cell Biol. 2:246-248.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 21. | May, R. C., M. E. Hall, H. N. Higgs, T. D. Pollard, T. Chakraborty, J. Wehland, L. M. Machesky, and A. S. Sechi. 1999. The Arp2/3 complex is essential for the actin-based motility of Listeria monocytogenes. Curr. Biol. 9:759-762.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 22. | McGee, K., M. Zettl, M. Way, and M. Fallman. 2001. A role for N-WASP in invasin-promoted internalisation. FEBS Lett. 509:59-65.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 23. | Miki, H., K. Miura, and T. Takenawa. 1996. N-WASP, a novel actin-depolymerizing protein, regulates the cortical cytoskeletal rearrangement in a PIP2-dependent manner downstream of tyrosine kinases. EMBO J. 15:5326-5335.[Medline] |
| 24. | Miki, H., T. Sasaki, Y. Takai, and T. Takenawa. 1998. Induction of filopodium formation by a WASP-related actin-depolymerizing protein N-WASP. Nature 391:93-96.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 25. | Mimuro, H., T. Suzuki, S. Suetsugu, H. Miki, T. Takenawa, and C. Sasakawa. 2000. Profilin is required for sustaining efficient intra- and intercellular spreading of Shigella flexneri. J. Biol. Chem. 275:28893-28901. |
| 26. | Moreau, V., F. Frischknecht, I. Reckmann, R. Vincentelli, G. Rabut, D. Stewart, and M. Way. 2000. A complex of N-WASP and WIP integrates signalling cascades that lead to actin polymerization. Nat. Cell Biol. 2:441-448.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 27. | Mounier, J., V. Laurent, A. Hall, P. Fort, M. F. Carlier, P. J. Sansonetti, and C. Egile. 1999. Rho family GTPases control entry of Shigella flexneri into epithelial cells but not intracellular motility. J. Cell Sci. 112:2069-2080.[Abstract] |
| 28. | Mullins, R. D. 2000. How WASP-family proteins and the Arp2/3 complex convert intracellular signals into cytoskeletal structures. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 12:91-96.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 29. | Mullins, R. D., J. A. Heuser, and T. D. Pollard. 1998. The interaction of Arp2/3 complex with actin: nucleation, high affinity pointed end capping, and formation of branching networks of filaments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:6181-6186. |
| 30. | Pruyne, D., M. Evangelista, C. Yang, E. Bi, S. Zigmond, A. Bretscher, and C. Boone. 2002. Role of formins in actin assembly: nucleation and barbed-end association. Science 297:612-615. |
| 31. | Ramesh, N., I. M. Anton, J. H. Hartwig, and R. S. Geha. 1997. WIP, a protein associated with Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein, induces actin polymerization and redistribution in lymphoid cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:14671-14676. |
| 32. | Rohatgi, R., H. Y. Ho, and M. W. Kirschner. 2000. Mechanism of N-WASP activation by CDC42 and phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate. J. Cell Biol. 150:1299-1310. |
| 33. | Scaplehorn, N., A. Holmstrom, V. Moreau, F. Frischknecht, I. Reckmann, and M. Way. 2002. Grb2 and nck act cooperatively to promote actin-based motility of vaccinia virus. Curr. Biol. 12:740-745.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 34. | Shibata, T., F. Takeshima, F. Chen, F. W. Alt, and S. B. Snapper. 2002. Cdc42 facilitates invasion but not the actin-based motility of Shigella. Curr. Biol. 12:341-345.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 35. | Suzuki, T., H. Miki, T. Takenawa, and C. Sasakawa. 1998. Neural Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein is implicated in the actin-based motility of Shigella flexneri. EMBO J. 17:2767-2776.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 36. | Teyssiere, N., C. Chiche-Portiche, and D. Raoult. 1992. Intracellular movements of Rickettsia conorii and R. typhi based on actin polymerization. Res. Microbiol. 143:821-829.[Medline] |
| 37. | Van Kirk, L. S., S. F. Hayes, and R. A. Heinzen. 2000. Ultrastructure of Rickettsia rickettsii actin tails and localization of cytoskeletal proteins. Infect. Immun. 68:4706-4713. |
| 38. | Welch, M. D., A. Iwamatsu, and T. J. Mitchison. 1997. Actin polymerization is induced by Arp2/3 protein complex at the surface of Listeria monocytogenes. Nature 385:265-269.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 39. | Welch, M. D., J. Rosenblatt, J. Skoble, D. A. Portnoy, and T. J. Mitchison. 1998. Interaction of human Arp2/3 complex and the Listeria monocytogenes ActA protein in actin filament nucleation. Science 281:105-108. |
| 40. | Winkler, H. H. 1990. Rickettsia species (as organisms). Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 44:131-153.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 41. | Yamaguchi, H., H. Miki, S. Suetsugu, L. Ma, M. W. Kirschner, and T. Takenawa. 2000. Two tandem verprolin homology domains are necessary for a strong activation of Arp2/3 complex-induced actin polymerization and induction of microspike formation by N-WASP. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:12631-12636. |
| 42. | Zeile, W. L., D. L. Purich, and F. S. Southwick. 1996. Recognition of two classes of oligoproline sequences in profilin-mediated acceleration of actin-based Shigella motility. J. Cell Biol. 133:49-59. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| J. Bacteriol. | J. Virol. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|
| Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. | Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | All ASM Journals |
|---|