Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, July 2003, p. 3866-3874, Vol. 71, No. 7
0019-9567/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/IAI.71.7.3866-3874.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Morton D. Sarver Laboratory for Contact Lens and Cornea Research, School of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720
Received 4 October 2002/ Returned for modification 22 January 2003/ Accepted 9 April 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The presence of antimicrobial factors in the human tear film was first reported in 1922 by Fleming and Allison, who described the bactericidal effects of lysozyme on gram-positive bacteria (12). Biochemical studies have since shown that various other factors in tears, including the iron-binding protein lactoferrin, secretory phospholipase A2, immunoglobulin A (IgA) antibodies, mucins, and ß-defensins, also possess antibacterial properties. A recent study demonstrated that whole human tears have strong bactericidal activity against a wide variety of gram-positive bacteria, with secretory phospholipase A2 being the major effector (20). Gram-negative bacteria, such as P. aeruginosa, were resistant to secretory phospholipase A2 at salt concentrations found in tears (20). Defensins have bactericidal activity against a wide variety of organisms, including gram-negative bacteria, and have been found in small but detectable quantities in tears (13). Other tear components can alter behavior of P. aeruginosa; e.g., both IgA and ocular mucin(s) bind these bacteria and modify their adherence to the cornea in animal models (6, 15), while lactoferrin induces twitching motility, thereby reducing the ability of the bacteria to form surface biofilms (23).
In this study, we tested the hypothesis that whole human tear fluid protects corneal epithelial cells against P. aeruginosa invasive and cytotoxic virulence mechanisms.
|
|
|---|
Bacterial inocula were prepared from overnight cultures grown on Trypticase soy agar plates at 37°C before suspension in minimal essential Eagle medium with Hank's salts and L-glutamine (Sigma, St Louis, Mo.) buffered with 1 M HEPES-NaOH (pH 7.6), 0.35 g of NaHCO3, and 6 g of bovine serum albumin (Sigma) per liter (MEM). The bacteria were initially prepared to a concentration of 108 CFU/ml of MEM as determined by spectrophotometry (optical density of 0.1 at 650 nm). The bacterial suspension was then diluted to a concentration of 106 CFU/ml in either MEM or whole tear fluid for use in experiments. Bacterial numbers were confirmed by viable counts after serial dilution.
Tear collection. Tear film was collected from the lower conjunctival sacs of human subjects by the use of capillary tubes as previously described (19) and as approved by the Committee for Protection of Human Subjects, University of California, Berkeley. A tear volume of 100 µl was collected over approximately 15 min on each occasion. Collected tears were pooled, aliquoted, and frozen (-20°C) until used in experiments. The same batch of pooled tears was used in all experiments.
Cell cultures. Rabbit corneal epithelial cells were cultured in 96-well tissue culture plates (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, N.J.) in the presence of SHEM medium as previously described (9). Cells were fed on alternate days and were used for experiments 4 to 6 days after being passaged. Prior to each experiment, wells containing cultured cells were washed once with 100 µl of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to remove residual SHEM and antibiotics.
Bacterial growth assays. The effect of tear fluid on bacterial growth and viability was tested with and without the presence of corneal epithelial cells. This testing was done by adding 40 µl of bacterial suspension, in either MEM or tear fluid, to empty wells of tissue culture dishes or to wells containing corneal epithelial cell cultures. Following a 3-h incubation at 37°C, 5 µl of bacterial suspension was collected for quantification by viable cell counting after serial dilution. The number of bacteria present in each well at the end of the experiment was compared to that in the starting inoculum to study bacterial growth and killing.
Cytotoxicity assays. Bacterium-induced cell damage was quantified by measuring lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release from dead or damaged cells. Wells containing cultured cells were inoculated with 40 µl of MEM or tear fluid containing 106 CFU of cytotoxic P. aeruginosa/ml. After a 3-h incubation at 37°C, the supernatant from each well was collected and diluted 1:20 with fresh MEM. The quantity of LDH in the samples was detected by using a cytotoxicity detection kit (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, Ind.) according to the manufacturer's instructions and expressed as absorbance at 490 nm. An additional two sets of wells were treated with MEM without bacteria. One set of cells was used to determine background LDH release, while cells in the other group were lysed with MEM containing Triton X-100 (0.25% [vol/vol]; LabChem Inc., Pittsburgh, Pa.) at the end of assay to determine the amount of LDH released when 100% of the cells were killed.
Trypan blue exclusion assays were also used to qualitatively assess the pattern of corneal cell death. Bacterial suspensions were removed after the 3-h incubation (see above), and cells were washed once with PBS (50 µl) prior to treatment with MEM (100 µl) containing gentamicin (200 µg/ml; BioWhittaker, Walkersville, Md.) for 1 h at 37°C to kill extracellular bacteria. This was done to match the methods used for invasion assays described below and to prevent the progression of cytotoxicity beyond the 3-h incubation period. Cells were washed with 100 µl of PBS before the addition of 100 µl of trypan blue solution (0.04% [wt/vol]) for 15 min to stain dead or dying cells. The trypan blue solution was then replaced with 50 µl of Ham's F-12 medium (BioWhittaker), and the center of each well was photographed by using an Olympus IX-70 inverted light microscope (10x objective, 10x ocular) attached to a video camera (Optronics, Goleta, Calif.) and a computer-based imaging system (Inovision, Raleigh, N.C.).
Invasion assays. Bacterial invasion of corneal epithelial cells was quantified by using gentamicin survival assays as previously described (9). Briefly, cells were incubated with an invasive P. aeruginosa strain (3 h, 37°C) prior to treatment with gentamicin to kill extracellular bacteria as described above for cytotoxicity assays. After being washed to remove the antibiotic, cells were lysed by exposure to PBS containing Triton X-100 (0.25% [vol/vol]) for 15 min. Viable counts were then performed on the lysate to quantify the previously intracellular bacteria.
Microscopy. Cells were grown on tissue culture-treated coverslips and mounted within a chamber which fit onto the stage of an Olympus IX-70 inverted light microscope. The temperature in the chamber was maintained at 37°C throughout the experiment by pumping heated water around a hollow region surrounding the metal chamber that was custom made for this purpose. Bacteria were added to the coverslips with or without tear fluid. A video camera (Optronics) and imaging system (Inovision) were used to capture video and still images of bacterial morphology, bacterial movement, and the interactions of bacteria with cells. In control experiments, bacteria were added to coverslips without corneal epithelial cells.
Statistics. At least four wells were used for each group of samples in all experiments, which were repeated at least twice. The Student t test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to analyze the data. P values of <0.05 were considered significant.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (84K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Effect of human tear fluid on cytotoxicity of P. aeruginosa strain 6206 towards corneal epithelial cells. Bacterium-induced cytotoxicity was greatly reduced by the presence of human tear fluid as indicated by the significantly reduced trypan blue staining (A) and LDH release (B) in the presence of tears. Abs, absorbance; SD, standard deviation.
|
1.7 x 106 CFU/ml to
2.5 x 106 CFU/ml in tears compared to
1 x 107 CFU/ml in MEM. The presence of corneal epithelial cells was not required for retardation of bacterial growth, since similar results were obtained when bacteria were inoculated into wells without cells (data not shown). This result suggested that cytoprotection might involve bacteriostatic activity. Tear fluid effects on other cytotoxic strains of P. aeruginosa. The effect of human tear fluid on four other cytotoxic strains was examined and compared to the effect on cytotoxic strain 6206. The results showed that tear fluid was bacteriostatic against only two of the five cytotoxic strains tested (6206 and PA103) (Fig. 2A). Surprisingly, three strains (6073, 19660, and 6077) grew at least as quickly in tear fluid as in MEM, yet the tear fluid was still cytoprotective (Fig. 2B). One of these (strain 19660) grew even faster in tear fluid than in MEM (P < 0.05; t test). The exact opposite result was obtained with strain PA103, the strain most susceptible to tear bacteriostatic activity (Fig. 2A), which demonstrated enhanced cytotoxic activity in tear fluid (Fig. 2B). This pattern of results suggested that cytoprotective activity of tear fluid might not depend upon bacteriostatic activity.
![]() View larger version (33K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Tear fluid effects on growth and cytotoxic activity of five cytotoxic strains of P. aeruginosa. (A) After 3 h, tear fluid (gray bars) inhibited the growth of two strains (6206 and PA103), while strain 19660 grew faster in tears. (B) LDH release assays indicated significantly reduced bacterial cytotoxicity in the presence of tears for four of five P. aeruginosa strains. Abs, absorbance; SD, standard deviation.
|
![]() View larger version (47K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Effect of tear fluid dilution on cytotoxicity and viability of P. aeruginosa strain 6206. Tears were diluted with MEM, and cytotoxicity towards corneal epithelial cells was assessed by staining with trypan blue (A) and measuring LDH release (B). Significant cytoprotection by tears was lost at a dilution of 1:3. (C) Viable cell counts after 3 h of incubation in tears or MEM showed that tear fluid was significantly bacteriostatic to strain 6206 at a 1:100 dilution. Abs, absorbance; SD, standard deviation.
|
![]() View larger version (28K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Comparison of the bacteriostatic agent sulfacetamide with tear fluid with respect to growth inhibition and cytoprotective activity. (A) Three hours of treatment with sulfacetamide (1 mg/ml) produced a growth inhibition of strain 6206 equivalent to that produced by tear fluid. (B) The cytoprotective activity of the same concentration of sulfacetamide did not match that of tears. Abs, absorbance; SD, standard deviation.
|
![]() View larger version (26K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Adaptation of P. aeruginosa to growth inhibitory and cytoprotective effects of tear fluid. (A) Growth of strain 6206 in tear fluid (open circles) or MEM (open squares) over a period of 8 h. After 4 h in tears, the bacterial growth rate matched that in MEM. (B) LDH release induced by strain 6206 after 8 h in tear fluid or in MEM. Cytoprotective effects of tears were no longer present at this time point. Bacterial adaptation to tears was lost on transfer to fresh tears. Abs, absorbance; SD, standard deviation. (C) Fresh tears inhibited the growth of strain 6206 for 4 to 6 h even when the bacteria had been previously exposed to tear fluid.
|
![]() View larger version (22K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Effect of tear fluid on invasion of corneal epithelial cells by and bacterial growth of five invasive strains of P. aeruginosa. Tear fluid (gray bars) inhibited corneal cell invasion by all five invasive strains (A) but inhibited the growth of only three isolates (B).
|
![]() View larger version (58K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Phase-contrast microscopy showing tear fluid effects on P. aeruginosa morphology. Cytotoxic and invasive P. aeruginosa isolates were examined in MEM (upper panels) and compared with those exposed to tear fluid for 3 h (lower panels). Typical results for three P. aeruginosa isolates are shown. Tear fluid induced short (e.g., strain 6294) and long (e.g., strain 6206) chain formation or aggregated bacteria into clumps (e.g., strain 6073). All previously motile strains became nonmotile in tear fluid.
|
Boiled tear fluid was no longer bacteriostatic against strain 6206 (Fig. 8A) and no longer visibly affected bacterial morphology, yet it retained full cytoprotective capacity as shown by both trypan blue staining (Fig. 8B) and LDH release (Fig. 8C). Similarly, boiled tear fluid was no longer bacteriostatic against strain PAK (Fig. 9A), but it retained the ability to block invasion by this strain (Fig. 9B). Boiled tears could no longer inhibit motility of any of the motile strains. These results showed that neither bacteriostatic activity nor motility loss was required for cytoprotection. They also suggested that separate tear film components might be involved.
![]() View larger version (51K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. Effect of boiled tear fluid on growth and cytotoxicity of P. aeruginosa strain 6206. (A) Bacteriostatic effects of tear fluid were lost after the fluid was boiled. Trypan blue staining (B) and LDH release assay (C) showed that boiled tears retained cytoprotective effects on cultured corneal epithelial cells. Abs, absorbance; SD, standard deviation.
|
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 9. Effect of boiled tear fluid on growth of and invasion by P. aeruginosa strain PAK. (A) Bacteriostatic effects of tear fluid were lost after the fluid was boiled. (B) Boiled tears retained their ability to inhibit bacterial invasion of cultured corneal epithelial cells.
|
|
|
|---|
All nine normally motile strains became nonmotile after incubation in tear fluid, and these strains were all susceptible to tear fluid cytoprotection. This suggested a possible link between loss of motility and cell protection. Yet tear cytoprotection occurred without motility loss after heat treatment of tear fluid. Since motility is not required for cytotoxic activity, as demonstrated by the nonmotile cytotoxic strain PA103, this was not a surprising result. It is, however, intriguing that PA103 was the only strain tested that resisted cytoprotection, becoming even more cytotoxic in tears, despite its susceptibility to bacteriostatic activity.
Tear fluid had various morphological effects on bacteria that varied among the 10 strains. In addition to motility loss, there was bacterial chain formation and clumping, which were not seen when bacteria were exposed to MEM. Clumping and chain formation were not universal responses and did not necessarily occur with the same strains, and clumps and chains were variable in size and shape depending upon the strain. None of the three observable morphological effects of tear fluid on bacteria were consistently correlated with either bacteriostatic or cytoprotective activity.
With the functional separation of tear bacteriostatic activity and cytoprotection demonstrated, the activity of boiled tear fluid suggested that there might also be biochemical differences. Heat treatment led to complete loss of both bacteriostatic activity and visible effects on bacterial morphology, while cytoprotective activity against both cytotoxic and invasive P. aeruginosa strains prevailed. The neat functional separation of these effects by heat treatment hints at differences in the responsible tear components. Candidate tear proteins for bacteriostatic activity and visible effects on bacterial morphology include lysozyme, lactoferrin, and IgA but not defensins or secretory phospholipase A, which are both heat stable. Chain formation suggested disruption of bacterial cell wall synthesis, a known target of both lysozyme and lactoferrin in gram-positive bacteria (1, 14). Although lysozyme and lactoferrin do not kill gram-negative bacteria by themselves, they can be bactericidal against some gram-negative bacteria in combination (2) and may have other effects on P. aeruginosa, particularly when combined with other antimicrobial factors present in tear fluid. IgA and tear film mucus may be involved in visible bacterial clumping; both have bacterial binding properties (6, 15, 17). In contrast to bacteriostatic factors, tear cytoprotective factors were heat stable, suggesting that lysozyme, lactoferrin, and IgA may not be required.
The mechanism of tear cytoprotective activity might also involve effects on the corneal epithelial cells. P. aeruginosa cytotoxicity and invasion of corneal epithelial cells require active participation of host epithelial cells, and inhibitors of host cell signaling can prevent these bacterium-induced effects (3). Furthermore, recent evidence suggests that corneal epithelia, like other epithelial surfaces, are capable of innate immune responses that include the secretion of antibacterial defensins (13, 18) and mucin(s) that may protect against bacterial adherence (17). These innate responses also involve host cell signaling (16). Various tear factors have the potential to affect bacterial interactions with cells through effects on corneal epithelia. These include growth factors and cytokines that modulate cell signaling; e.g., hepatocyte growth factor modulates corneal epithelial cell susceptibility to both invasive and cytotoxic P. aeruginosa strains via effects on epithelial cell polarity (11).
Although it would be feasible to study known tear components in isolation, studies of antimicrobial components of tissue secretions have shown that the components can be dependent upon one another for their activities. For example, enteric bacteria are not susceptible to killing by either lactoferrin or secretory IgA alone but are susceptible to the combination of these proteins (21). Similar additive or synergistic effects were shown for lactoferrin and lysozyme (2, 14, 22). Furthermore, the activities of antimicrobial factors can depend heavily upon the concentration of other bystander factors, such as salt and calcium (2). Interestingly, the addition of salt to human tear fluid did not affect its bacteriostatic activity, motility inhibition, or cytoprotective effects, even when added at concentrations that were shown previously to inhibit the synergistic activity of antimicrobials that are known to be in tears (22). Thus, subtractive methods are likely to be the most useful for understanding the relative roles of different tear components in the effects of tear fluid on bacteria. These studies are currently under way.
The relationship between the findings of this study and ocular surface defenses in vivo is yet to be determined. It is interesting, however, that four of the five corneal isolates among the group were resistant to tear bacteriostatic activity and four of five laboratory isolates were susceptible. During contact lens wear, the leading predisposing factor for P. aeruginosa corneal infection, bacteria can adhere to contact lens surfaces, and bacteria that gain access to the tear film may become trapped under the lens. In the present study, tear fluid was found to lose all observed activities against P. aeruginosa after prolonged contact, suggesting bacterial degradation of active tear film components. Cytoprotective activity of tear fluid also declined rapidly with dilution, suggesting another mechanism by which contact lens wear could interfere with tear protective functions. When a lens is inserted into the eye (when it is most likely to be inoculated with gram-negative bacteria), it is accompanied by a volume of lens care solution several times the volume of the tear film on the ocular surface. Whether or not changes to tear protective effects contribute to the increased risk of infection associated with the use of contact lenses is to be determined.
These results also raise questions about the significance of in vitro assays performed in the presence of tissue culture media to study bacterial interactions with host cells. Like the ocular surface, other mucosal sites are also coated with fluid secretions. Whether or not in vitro cell culture phenomena mirror bacteria-cell interactions that actually occur in vivo in the presence of these fluids may need to be examined separately for each mucosal site.
The data collected in this study suggest that tear effects on P. aeruginosa and the interactions of this bacterium with corneal epithelial cells may be complex. Although cytoprotection does not depend upon tear bacteriostatic activity or effects on bacterial motility, it remains possible that these activities involve the same, or overlapping, tear film components. Studies aimed at deciphering the molecular mechanisms of tear effects on P. aeruginosa are likely to improve our understanding of how the ocular surface resists infection and what circumstances predispose to infectious disease. Furthermore, the identification of contributing tear factors could eventually lead to new approaches to the prevention and treatment of infections.
We also thank Minjian Ni for technical assistance and Robert Sack for helpful discussions.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»