Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Middlebury College, Middlebury, Vermont,1 Department of Otolaryngology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee2
Received 29 December 2003/ Returned for modification 11 February 2004/ Accepted 14 July 2004
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Gene regulation and the synthesis of B. burgdorferi proteins in response to the natural cycling between Ixodes species vectors and vertebrate hosts have been investigated on the global level with DNA microarrays (5, 37, 38). The manipulation of in vitro culture conditions approximating the host environment has revealed regulatory networks and patterns of protein expression relevant to the host-pathogen interaction (1, 7, 23-25, 43, 44, 51). Some findings suggest that the onset of stationary phase in the tick and the accompanying slowing of replication in response to an altered biochemical environment may be related to cell density-dependent signaling. Under in vitro conditions, lipoproteins P35 and P7.5 are upregulated at the onset of stationary phase (43), and a broader investigation identified the growth phase-dependent expression of 13 additional proteins (44). Following infection, B. burgdorferi also induces proteins that facilitate interaction with host proteins, cells, or tissues (10, 18, 31). OspE family proteins protect the spirochete by binding to factor H, which inhibits complement activation, therefore interfering with the innate immune response (22, 27, 28, 34, 35). More fundamentally, the spirochete can also modify its plasmid profile when changing hosts (47), with a resultant alteration in de novo purine synthesis (32).
An unresolved issue regarding the response of B. burgdorferi to its changing environment is that of quorum sensing mediated by autoinducer 2 (AI-2). AI-2 synthase, encoded by the luxS gene, was first discovered in Vibrio harveyi, and luxS homologues are known in a number of bacteria, including B. burgdorferi (16, 17, 36, 37, 50). The functionality of the B. burgdorferi luxS homologue was confirmed by demonstrating that conditioned medium derived from Escherichia coli DH5
transformants harboring borrelial luxS signals differential protein expression in the spirochete (57). Moreover, B. burgdorferi preferentially expresses its luxS gene and a sensory transduction histidine kinase while resident in the gut of engorging ticks (37). However, other findings indicate that B. burgdorferi does not need a functional LuxS/AI-2 system gene to infect mice by intradermal needle inoculation and that it is not essential for adaptation and survival in mammals (24).
The secretion of proteins into the extracellular environment is a common feature of microbial pathogens, and while outer membrane-associated proteins of B. burgdorferi have been studied extensively, exoprotein release by the spirochete has not been reported. B. burgdorferi contains homologues of the essential sec proteins of the general secretory pathway, which is thought to be the mechanism for lipoprotein transport to the outer membrane (17). Related spirochetes secrete proteins into the extracellular environment. Leptospira interrogans exports SphH, a pore-forming hemolysin that is cytotoxic to mammalian cells (30), and the major surface protein (Msp) of Treponema denticola is a pore-forming cytolysin with hemolytic activity (14).
Since B. burgdorferi responds to changes in the host environment, we investigated whether the spirochete is capable of extracellular protein secretion and if the release of proteins into conditioned medium is influenced by the growth phase. The presence of the borrelial porin Oms28 and the 26-kDa glycosaminoglycan-binding protein Bgp in RPMI conditioned medium was determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) microsequencing. Oms28 secretion as a function of spirochete growth phase was also monitored by intrinsic radiolabeling and immunochemistry.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Intrinsic radiolabeling experiments. B. burgdorferi strains passaged in the laboratory fewer than 10 times at 34°C were harvested by centrifugation at 12,000 x g for 10 min, washed once gently with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and recovered by centrifugation at 12,000 x g for 5 min. The washed spirochete pellet was resuspended in RPMI-1640 medium (pH 7.5) (Sigma Chemical Co.) lacking cysteine and methionine. For intrinsic labeling, 35S-labeled methionine and cysteine (Trans label; Perkin-Elmer Life Sciences, Boston, Mass.) was added at concentrations ranging from 250 to 800 µCi/ml (depending on the experiment), and the spirochetes were incubated at 34°C for 30 to 180 min. Following labeling, the spirochetes were recovered by centrifugation for 10 min at 12,000 x g. The conditioned medium was removed and centrifuged again in the same manner. Most conditioned medium samples were concentrated by ultrafiltration (Centricon YM-3; Millipore Corp., Bedford, Mass.) and either used immediately or stored at 20°C. Conditioned RPMI medium and whole spirochetes were resolved by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), stained with Coomassie brilliant blue R-250 (Bio-Rad), and exposed to XAR-5 photographic film (Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester, N.Y.). Intrinsic radiolabeling experiments and experiments involving detection of borrelia proteins by immunoblotting with specific antiserum were conducted a minimum of three times.
The effect of growth phase on protein induction and secretion was examined by harvesting spirochetes at the mid-logarithmic, late-logarithmic, and stationary phases of growth (5 x 107 to 1 x 108 cells per ml). Spirochetes were resuspended, concentrated approximately 25-fold in RPMI-1640 medium, and radiolabeled for 60, 120, and 180 min.
SDS-PAGE, immunoblotting, and RIP. Borrelia samples were resolved by discontinuous SDS-PAGE as described by Laemmli (29). Whole spirochetes and conditioned media were examined by immunoblotting and radioimmunoprecipitation (RIP) for specific borrelia proteins. Following SDS-PAGE, proteins were transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane at 100 mA for 3.5 to 4.5 h as described previously (8). Protein transfer was confirmed by reversible Coomassie staining, prestained molecular mass markers (Bio-Rad, Richmond, Calif.), or with radiolabeled proteins by autoradiography after abatement of the chemiluminescent signal. Most immunoblots employed 5 x 107 to 1 x 108 whole spirochetes, and the conditioned medium corresponding to 1 x 108 to 2 x 108 spirochetes. Membranes were processed according to the Western-Light Plus chemiluminescent detection system (Tropix, Bedford, Mass.) and probed for 1 h with a 1:5,000 dilution of mouse monoclonal antibodies to OspA (H5332) and OspB (H6831) (obtained from Alan Barbour, University of California, Irvine). A goat antimouse alkaline phosphatase conjugate secondary antibody was used at a dilution of 1:15,000.
A rabbit antiserum specific for Oms28 (kindly provided by Jonathan Skare, Texas A&M University, College Station, Tex.) was used at a dilution of 1:5,000. Immunoblots with
-Oms28 were carried out according to the Amersham ECL system (Amersham, Piscataway, N.J.) with the donkey antirabbit horseradish peroxidase conjugate used at a dilution of 1:5,000. For RIP of conditioned RPMI medium, spirochetes were radiolabeled at 5 x 108 cells per ml with 35S Trans label at 500 uCi/ml for 90 min at 34°C. Whole spirochetes and conditioned medium were processed as described above. Fifty microliters of conditioned medium was reacted with 2 µl of antiserum overnight at 4°C. Antigen-antibody complexes were recovered with protein A-agarose beads (Sigma), washed according to established protocols (21), and resolved by SDS-PAGE.
Monoclonal antiserum directed against the B. burgdorferi DnaK homologue was provided by Michael Kramer (LA-3) and was used at a dilution of 1:50. A mouse polyclonal antibody against Bgp was a generous gift from Nikhat Parveen (University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Mass.) and used at a dilution of 1:2,000. A monoclonal antiserum against OspC (33) was provided by Robert Gilmore (Centers for Disease Control, Fort Collins, Colo.), and antiflagellin (H9724), originally produced by Alan Barbour (3), was kindly provided by Brian Stevenson (University of Kentucky, Lexington, Ky.).
Protein sequencing by LC-MS/MS. B. burgdorferi strain B31 was harvested at a cell density of 6 x 107 spirochetes per ml, washed twice with PBS, and resuspended in RPMI medium to 6 x 109 spirochetes per ml. Conditioned culture medium from the equivalent of 2 x 109 spirochetes was resolved by SDS-PAGE and stained with Coomassie brilliant blue. Two protein bands, at approximately 26 and 28 kDa, were extracted from the gel, washed with 50% high-performance liquid chromatography-grade acetonitrile in water, digested with trypsin, and microsequenced by high performance liquid chromatography coupled to an LCQ DECA ion-trap mass spectrometer (Finnegan) equipped with a nanospray source (ThermoFinnigan, San Jose, Calif.). Sequencing was carried out at the Tufts University Analytical Core Facility (Boston, Mass.). Peptide fragments were evaluated using the Sequest database search program.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
To confirm the identity of Oms28, a polyclonal antiserum was used to detect a band at 28 kDa that was recognized from both whole cells and conditioned medium (Fig. 1B). A monoclonal antiserum against DnaK did not recognize this cytoplasmic marker in the conditioned medium.
B. burgdorferi releases outer membrane vesicles (OMV) and membrane blebs (58), particularly under stressful conditions, such as metabolic depletion and changes in pH. OMV are known to contain OspA and -B (13), as well as Oms28 (52), and so the extracellular secretion of Oms28 and Bgp could be coincident with the release of OMV. We therefore used monoclonal antisera directed against outer membrane proteins OspA and -B in an immunoblot analysis as markers for OMV. Radiolabeled whole spirochete and conditioned medium fractions were prepared and resolved by SDS-PAGE, transferred to PVDF membrane, and probed. As determined by immunoblotting, Oms28 was present in both whole spirochetes and conditioned medium (Fig. 3A). While OspA and -B were prominently detected in 108 whole spirochetes, these outer membrane proteins were only barely detectable in the 2-h sample of conditioned RPMI medium from the equivalent of 2 x 108 spirochetes (Fig. 3B, left panel). An autoradiograph of the membrane after abatement of the chemiluminescent signal confirmed the efficient transfer of spirochete proteins (Fig. 3B, right panel) and that the major secreted protein has an apparent molecular mass less than that of OspB or -A. Taken together with the results shown in Fig. 1B, these findings suggest that the extracellular secretion of Oms28 does not appear to be a primary consequence of OMV release or cell lysis.
|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The secretion of the Oms28 porin was monitored for up to 3 h by radiolabeling and immunoblot analysis. While Oms28 accumulated in the conditioned medium, pulse-chase experiments demonstrated that other radiolabeled proteins released immediately at the onset of the chase turned over with time. It is of interest to determine if this turnover is associated with proteolysis, and if so, whether proteolytic activity is spirochete or medium associated (55). Importantly, the pattern of secreted proteins in conditioned BSK II medium lacking serum and bovine serum albumin was identical to that obtained in RPMI medium. Spirochetes were also radiolabeled in serum-free BSK II medium containing a lipid supplement over a period of several days, but the albumin content of the conditioned medium prevented facile resolution of proteins by SDS-PAGE.
While the experiments reported here show extracellular protein secretion at spirochete densities of 4 x 108 spirochetes per ml and greater, secretion of Oms28 was also observed at spirochete densities of 107 per ml (data not shown). For mid- to late-logarithmic-phase cells, Oms28 is selectively released into the culture medium over time (Fig. 5B, lanes 1 to 5). However, when cells enter stationary phase (Fig. 5B, lanes 6 to 8), selective secretion of Oms28 decreases dramatically and a number of additional proteins appear in the medium, particularly between 21 and 33 kDa. In these whole cells, proteins of 42, 34, 29, 24 and 17 kDa in mass were induced as the spirochetes progressed to stationary phase. Some of these proteins correspond in size to proteins that are upregulated as spirochetes pass from logarithmic to stationary phase, including the band around 24 kDa that likely represents OspC, which has been detected in conditioned medium from mid-logarithmic-phase cells (data not shown).
Skare et al. established that Oms28 is a porin that contains a functional leader sequence, localizes to the B. burgdorferi outer membrane, and anomalously partitions with the aqueous phase following Triton X-114 extraction of whole spirochetes. While Oms28 was associated with OMV in these studies, the porin remained membrane associated even after incubation of OMV in salt-containing buffers (54). For the work described here, it was therefore important to determine whether the extracellular release of Oms28 occurs freely or whether it is OMV associated. Immunoblot analysis of the proteins recovered from conditioned medium (Fig. 3) suggests that the release of Oms28 under the experimental conditions employed in this study occurs by a vesicle-independent mechanism. The radiolabeling experiments support these findings, since conditioned medium derived from early- to mid-logarithmic-phase cells essentially lacks OspA and -B. OMV and membrane blebs are recoverable from culture medium at centrifugal forces of 25,000 x g and above (13). If the exoproteins described here were primarily associated with OMV or membrane blebs, then OspA and -B would have been more readily detected. However, OspA and -B lipoproteins were present in the conditioned medium of stationary-phase spirochetes along with flagellin, indicating that the physiological state of the spirochete influences exoprotein release. Also, serum starvation of B. burgdorferi induces changes in protein synthesis (1), so this nutritional stress could also be influencing the release of proteins from the spirochete.
The structure of native Oms28 has yet to be determined, but gram-negative bacterial porins are generally organized as trimers in their native form, with a secondary structure of amphipathic beta-pleated sheets spanning the outer membrane in a closed barrel conformation (11, 26). Oligomeric forms of Oms28 have been observed on SDS-polyacrylamide gels or associated with OMV preparations under native conditions (54). We also observed high-molecular-weight proteins in some of our radiolabeled preparations that may represent oligomeric forms of secreted Oms28 (data not shown). These studies need to be repeated under conditions that favor the resolution of oligomeric forms and then confirmed by immunoblotting. Importantly, the opportunity to obtain a detergent-free preparation of secreted Oms28 will simplify structural and biochemical characterization of the porin, and these preparations can be used directly in assays to test for pore-forming activity against cellular targets.
Two additional B. burgdorferi porins have been characterized; the P66 protein, also known as the Oms66 porin (53) and the P13 porin (39). The P13 porin is a surface-exposed integral outer membrane protein. Preliminary findings suggest that the P13 porin is not released into conditioned medium (data not shown).
The secretion of Bgp/Pfs-2 by B. burgdorferi is noteworthy, since this protein may be bifunctional; it serves as an adhesin by binding to glycosoaminoglycans and is predicted to exhibit a 5'-methylthioadenosine/S-adenosylhomocysteine nucleosidase activity. The enzymatic activity is also encoded by pfs-1, which is resident in an operon in B. burgdorferi containing metK and luxS (17, 24). Other bacteria that exhibit a quorum-sensing response have a similar operon, although the existence of a functional quorum-sensing response in B. burgdorferi is an ongoing point of debate. A third B. burgdorferi pfs paralogue, BBI06, located on lp28-4, has yet to be studied. BBI06 and Bgp/Pfs-2 have predicted signal sequences, while Pfs-1 does not, implying different cellular locations for these proteins. Since most bacteria encode only a single copy of pfs, this gene duplication in B. burgdorferi suggests an intriguing functional divergence for pfs, a notion that is supported by a likely bifunctional activity of Bgp/Pfs-2, the potential role of pfs-1 in quorum sensing, and the presence of a plasmid-encoded paralogue.
The GAG-binding activity of Bgp is well defined, a property shared with the decorin-binding proteins DbpA and -B (15, 19, 20). Bgp binds heparin and agglutinates erythrocytes, and recombinant protein blocks the attachment of spirochetes to target cells (28). Parveen et al. established that host-adapted spirochetes demonstrate enhanced binding to cultured endothelial cells and that DbpA and DbpB are expressed at higher levels on the spirochete surface (42). We have detected Bgp/Pfs-2 in several preparations of conditioned medium by sequencing but not by immunoblot analysis. Bgp/Pfs-2 is present in whole cells and conditioned medium in much smaller amounts than Oms28, which likely accounts for the difficulty in detecting Bgp/Pfs-2 with the antiserum currently available.
Whole-genome array studies reinforce the contention that secretion of Oms28 and Bgp/Pfs-2 may be significant in vivo. Two studies reveal that an increase in temperature leads to a threefold induction of oms28 expression. Of potential relevance, a number of hemolysins of the same paralogous family that are believed to comprise a holin-like system (12) were also induced by this temperature increase (37, 38). Bgp/Pfs-2 was also upregulated when the response to tick feeding was mimicked by altering the pH from 7.5 (at 23°C) to 6.8 (at 37°C) (44). In contrast, microarray analysis of host-adapted B. burgdorferi demonstrates that oms28 is strongly down-regulated in the host environment. However, in this same study (5), the P66 porin, (53), which is also an adhesin (9), was strongly induced.
Secretion of Bgp by B. burgdorferi could serve as a decoy to help the spirochete avert the immune response. Another intriguing model for the cooperative interaction of secreted forms of Bgp and Oms28 is suggested by the group A streptococci, which use an adhesin and the secreted pore-forming hemolysin, streptolysin O, to bind specifically to keratinocytes and stimulate a proinflammatory response (46).
More-thorough analysis of the borrelial secretome will likely reveal additional proteins of interest. The secretome of Helicobacter pylori contains 26 identified proteins, including a pore-forming vaculating toxin, serine protease, and three flagellar proteins (6). Similar pore-forming cytotoxins are produced by Staphylococcus species, Escherichia coli, and Streptococcus species (4, 40), and it will be important to determine if Oms28 exhibits similar activity. A B. burgdorferi thiol-dependent hemolytic activity has been described (59), but efforts to identify the factor responsible have been elusive.
The secretion of the Oms28 porin and the GAG-binding Bgp adhesin by B. burgdorferi may be an important component of the host-pathogen interaction. Very recently, studies with mice show that isolates of B. burgdorferi that propagate to high levels in blood express significantly lower levels of Oms28 compared to isolates that are not disseminated (I. Schwartz, personal communication). Perhaps Oms28 is upregulated when the spirochete comes in contact with host cells or tissues, which may enhance navigation to new sites. Nutrient availability may also influence Oms28 homeostasis. In any event, the collective evidence suggests that the synthesis and outer membrane retention of at least one porin are regulated, in part, in response to host niche. Future experiments are planned to determine the oligomeric organization of secreted Oms28 and to assay these detergent-free preparations for hemolytic and cytotoxic activity.
In summary, we report the secretion of Oms28 and Bgp/Pfs-2 by B. burgdorferi into protein-free medium, the first description of extracellular protein secretion by the spirochete. A complete description of the B. burgdorferi secretome is in progress. The biochemical characterization of these exoproteins and characterization of the host response to these extracellular products will yield important new insights into the interaction of the spirochete with its hosts.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Jonathan Skare, John Leong, and Ira Schwartz for valuable discussions and Grace Spatafora for helpful comments on the manuscript. The gifts of antisera from Jonathan Skare, Nikhat Parveen, Alan Barbour, Jonas Bunikis, Michael Kramer, Robert Gilmore, and Brian Stevenson were greatly appreciated.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Alban, P. S., P. W. Johnson, and D. R. Nelson. 2000. Serum-starvation-induced changes in protein synthesis and morphology of Borrelia burgdorferi. Microbiology 146:119-127. |
| 2. | Barbour, A. G. 1984. Isolation and cultivation of Lyme disease spirochetes. Yale J. Biol. Med. 57:521-525.[Medline] |
| 3. | Barbour, A. G., S. F. Hayes, R. A. Heiland, M. E. Schrumpf, and S. L. Tessier. 1986. A Borrelia-specific monoclonal antibody binds to a flagellar epitope. Infect. Immun. 52:549-554. |
| 4. | Bhakdi, S., H. Bayley, A. Valeva, I. Walev, B. Walker, U. Weller, M. Kehoe, and M. Palmer. 1996. Staphylococcal alpha-toxin, streptolysin-O, and Escherichia coli hemolysin: prototypes of pore-forming bacterial cytolysins. Arch. Microbiol. 165:73-79.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 5. | Brooks, C. S., S. P. Hefty, S. E. Jolliff, and D. R. Akins. 2003. Global analysis of Borrelia burgdorferi genes regulated by mammalian host-specific signals. Infect. Immun. 71:3371-3383. |
| 6. | Bumman, D., S. Aksu, M. Wendland, K. Janek, U. Zimny-Arndt, N. Sabarth, T. Meyer, and P. Jungblut. 2002. Proteome analysis of secreted proteins of the gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori. Infect. Immun. 70:3396-3403. |
| 7. | Cluss, R. G., and J. T. Boothby. 1990. Thermoregulation of protein synthesis in Borrelia burgdorferi. Infect. Immun. 58:1038-1042. |
| 8. | Cluss, R. G., A. S. Goel, H. Rehm, J. G. Schoenecker, and J. T. Boothby. 1996. Coordinate synthesis and turnover of heat shock proteins in Borrelia burgdorferi: degradation of DnaK during recovery from heat shock. Infect. Immun. 64:1736-1743.[Abstract] |
| 9. | Coburn, J., W. Chege, L. Magoun, S. C. Bodary, and J. M. Leong. 1999. Characterization of a candidate Borrelia burgdorferi ß3-chain integrin ligand identified using a phage display library. Mol. Microbiol. 34:926-940.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 10. | Coleman, J. L., J. A. Gebbia, J. Piesman, J. L. Degen, T. H. Bugge, and J. L. Benach. 1997. Plasminogen is required for efficient dissemination of B. burgdorferi in ticks and for enhancement of spirochetemia in mice. Cell 89:1111-1119.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 11. | Cowan, S. W., T. Schirmer, G. Rummel, M. Steiert, R. Ghosh, R. A. Pauptit, J. N. Jansonius, and J. P. Rosenbusch. 1992. Crystal structures explain functional properties of two E. coli porins. Nature 358:727-733.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 12. | Damman, C. J., C. H. Eggers, D. S. Samuels, and D. B. Oliver. 2000. Characterization of Borrelia burgdorferi BlyA and BlyB proteins: a prophage-encoded holin-like system. J. Bacteriol. 182:6791-6797. |
| 13. | Dorward, D. W., T. G. Schwan, and C. F. Garon. 1991. Immune capture and detection of Borrelia burgdorferi antigens in urine, blood, or tissues from infected ticks, mice, dogs, and humans. J. Clin. Microbiol. 29:1162-1170. |
| 14. | Fenno, J. C., P. M. Hannam, W. K. Leung, M. Tamura, V. J. Uitto, and B. C. McBride. 1998. Cytopathic effects of the major surface protein and the chymotrypsinlike protease of Treponema denticola. Infect. Immun. 66:1869-1877. |
| 15. | Fischer, J. R., N. Parveen, L. Magoun, and J. M. Leong. 2003. Decorin-binding proteins A and B confer distinct mammalian cell type-specific attachment by Borrelia burgdorferi, the Lyme disease spirochete. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:7307-7312. |
| 16. | Fong, K. P., W. O. Chung, R. J. Lamont, and D. R. Demuth. 2001. Intra- and interspecies regulation of gene expression by Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans LuxS. Infect. Immun. 69:7625-7634. |
| 17. | Fraser, C. M., S. Casjens, W. M. Huang, G. G. Sutton, R. Clayton, R. Lathigra, O. White, K. A. Ketchum, R. Dodson, E. K. Hickey, M. Gwinn, B. Dougherty, J. F. Tomb, R. D. Fleischmann, D. Richardson, J. Peterson, A. R. Kerlavage, J. Quackenbush, S. Salzberg, M. Hanson, R. van Vugt, N. Palmer, M. D. Adams, J. Gocayne, and J. C. Venter. 1997. Genomic sequence of a Lyme disease spirochaete, Borrelia burgdorferi. Nature 390:580-586.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 18. | Gebbia, J. A., J. L. Coleman, and J. L. Benach. 2001. Borrelia spirochetes upregulate release and activation of matrix metalloproteinase gelatinase B (MMP-9) and collagenase 1 (MMP-1) in human cells. Infect. Immun. 69:456-462. |
| 19. | Guo, B. P., S. J. Norris, L. C. Rosenberg, and M. Höök. 1995. Adherence of Borrelia burgdorferi to the proteoglycan decorin. Infect. Immun. 63:3467-3472.[Abstract] |
| 20. | Guo, B. P., E. L. Brown, D. W. Dorward, L. C. Rosenberg, and M. Hook. 1998. Decorin-binding adhesions from Borrelia burgdorferi. Mol. Microbiol. 30:711-723.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 21. | Harlow, E., and D. Lane. 1988. Antibodies: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 22. | Hellwage, J., T. Meri, T. Heikkilä, A. Alitalo, J. Panelius, P. Lahdenne, I. J. T. Seppälä, and S. Meri. 2001. The complement regulator Factor H binds to the surface protein OspE of Borrelia burgdorferi. J. Biol. Chem. 276:8427-8435. |
| 23. | Hodzic, E., S. Feng, K. J. Freet, and S. W. Barthold. 2003. Borrelia burgdorferi population dynamics and prototype gene expression during infection of immunocompetent and immunodeficient mice. Infect. Immun. 71:5042-5055. |
| 24. | Hübner, A., A. T. Revel, D. M. Nolen, K. E. Hagman, and M. V. Norgard. 2003. Expression of a luxS gene is not required for Borrelia burgdorferi infection of mice via needle inoculation. Infect. Immun. 71:2892-2896. |
| 25. | Indest, K. J., R. Ramamoorthy, M. Solé, R. D. Gilmore, B. J. B. Johnson, and M. T. Philipp. 1997. Cell-density-dependent expression of Borrelia burgdorferi lipoproteins in vitro. Infect. Immun. 65:1165-1171.[Abstract] |
| 26. | Koebnik, R., K. P. Locher, and P. Van Gelder. 2000. Structure and function of bacterial outer membrane proteins: barrels in a nutshell. Mol. Microbiol. 37:239-253.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 27. | Kraiczy, P., J. Hellwage, C. Skerka, H. Becker, M. Kirschfink, M. M. Simon, V. Brade, P. F. Zipfel, and R. Wallich. 2004. Complement resistance of Borrelia burgdorferi correlates with the expression of BbCRASP-1, a novel linear plasmid-encoded surface protein that interacts with human factor H and FHL-1 and is unrelated to Erp proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 279:2421-2429. |
| 28. | Kraiczy, P., C. Skerka, V. Brade, and P. F. Zipfel. 2001. Further characterization of complement regulator-acquiring surface proteins of Borrelia burgdorferi. Infect. Immun. 69:7800-7809. |
| 29. | Laemmli, U. K. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680-685.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 30. | Lee, S. H., S. Kim, S. C. Park, and M. J. Kim. 2002. Cytotoxic activities of Leptospira interrogans hemolysin SphH as a pore-forming protein on mammalian cells. Infect. Immun. 70:315-322. |
| 31. | Leong, J. M., H. Wang, L. Magoun, J. A. Field, P. E. Morrissey, D. Robbins, J. B. Tatro, J. Coburn, and N. Parveen. 1998. Different classes of proteoglycans contribute to the attachment of Borrelia burgdorferi to cultured endothelial and brain cells. Infect. Immun. 66:994-999. |
| 32. | Margolis, N., D. Hogan, K. Tilly, and P. A. Rosa. 1994. Plasmid location of Borrelia purine biosynthesis gene homologues. J. Bacteriol. 176:6427-6432. |
| 33. | Mbow, M. L., R. D. Gilmore, Jr., and R. G. Titus. 1999. An OspC-specific monoclonal antibody passively protects mice from tick-transmitted infection by Borrelia burgdorferi B31. Infect. Immun. 67:5470-5472. |
| 34. | McDowell, J. V., E. Tran, D. Hamilton, J. Wolfgang, K. Miller, and R. T. Marconi. 2003. Analysis of the ability of spirochete species associated with relapsing fever, avian borreliosis, and epizootic bovine abortion to bind factor H and cleave c3b. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:3905-3910. |
| 35. | Metts, S., J. V. McDowell, M. Theisen, P. R. Hansen, and R. T. Marconi. 2003. Analysis of the OspE determinants involved in the binding of factor H and OspE targeting antibodies elicited during infection in mice. Infect. Immun. 71:3587-3596. |
| 36. | Miller, M. B., and B. L. Bassler. 2001. Quorum sensing in bacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 55:165-199.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 37. | Narasimhan, S., F. Santiago, R. A. Koski, B. Brei, J. F. Anderson, D. Fish, and E. Fikrig. 2002. Examination of the Borrelia burgdorferi transcriptome in Ixodes scapularis during feeding. J. Bacteriol. 184:3122-3125. |
| 38. | Ojaimi, C., C. Brooks, S. Casjens, P. Rosa, A. Elias, A. Barbour, A. Jasinskas, J. Benach, L. Katona, J. Radolf, M. Caimano, J. Skare, K. Swingle, D. Akins, and I. Schwartz. 2003. Profiling of temperature-induced changes in Borrelia burgdorferi gene expression by using whole genome arrays. Infect. Immun. 71:1689-1705. |
| 39. | Östberg, Y., M. Pinne, R. Benz, P. Rosa, and Sven Bergström. 2002. Elimination of channel-forming activity by insertional inactivation of the p13 gene in Borrelia burgdorferi. J. Bacteriol. 184:6811-6819. |
| 40. | Papini, E., M. Zoratti, and T. L. Cover. 2001. In search of the Helicobacter pylori VacA mechanism of action. Toxicon 39:1757-1767.[Medline] |
| 41. | Parveen, N., and J. M. Leong. 2000. Identification of a candidate glycosaminoglycan-binding adhesin of the Lyme disease spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi. Mol. Microbiol. 35:1220-1234.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 42. | Parveen, N., M. Caimano, J. D. Radolf, and J. M. Leong. 2003. Adaptation of the Lyme disease spirochaete to the mammalian host environment results in enhanced glycosaminoglycan and host cell binding. Mol. Microbiol. 47:1433-1444.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 43. | Ramamoorthy, R., and D. Scholl-Meeker. 2001. Borrelia burgdorferi proteins whose expression is similarly affected by culture temperature and pH. Infect. Immun. 69:2739-2742. |
| 44. | Ramamoorthy, R., and M. T. Philipp. 1998. Differential expression of Borrelia burgdorferi proteins during growth in vitro. Infect. Immun. 66:5119-5124. |
| 45. | Revel, A. T., A. M. Talaat, and M. V. Norgard. 2002. DNA microarray analysis of differential gene expression in Borrelia burgdorferi, the Lyme disease spirochete. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:1562-1567. |
| 46. | Ruiz, N., B. Wang, A. Pentland, and C. M. Caparon. 1998. Streptolysin O and adherence synergistically modulate proinflammatory responses of keratinocytes to group A streptococci. Mol. Microbiol. 27:337-346.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 47. | Ryan, J. R., J. F. Levine, C. S. Apperson, L. Lubke, R. A. Wirtz, P. A. Spears, and P. E. Orndorff. 1998. An experimental chain of infection reveals that distinct Borrelia burgdorferi populations are selected in arthropod and mammalian hosts. Mol. Microbiol. 30:365-379.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 48. | Sadziene, A., D. D. Thomas, and A. G. Barbour. 1995. Borrelia burgdorferi mutant lacking Osp: biological and immunological characterization. Infect. Immun. 63:1573-1580.[Abstract] |
| 49. | Salgers, A. A., and D. D. Whitt. 2002. Biochemical pathogenesis: a molecular approach, 2nd ed., p. 187-197. ASM Press, Washington, D.C. |
| 50. | Schauder, S., K. Shokat, M. G. Surette, and B. L. Bassler. 2001. The LuxS family of bacterial autoinducers: biosynthesis of a novel quorum-sensing signal molecule. Mol. Microbiol. 41:463-476.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 51. | Schwan, T. G., J. Piesman, W. T. Golde, M. C. Dolan, and P. A. Rosa. 1995. Induction of an outer surface protein on Borrelia burgdorferi during tick feeding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:2909-2913. |
| 52. | Skare, J. T., E. S. Shang, D. M. Foley, D. R. Blanco, C. I. Champion, T. Mirzabekov, Y. Sokolov, B. L. Kagan, J. N. Miller, and M. A. Lovett. 1995. Virulent strain associated outer membrane proteins of Borrelia burgdorferi. J. Clin. Investig. 96:2380-2392. |
| 53. | Skare, J. T., T. A. Mirzabekov, E. S. Shang, D. R. Blanco, H. Erdjument-Bromage, J. Bunikis, S. Bergstrom, P. Tempst, B. L. Kagan, J. N. Miller, and M. A. Lovett. 1997. The Oms66 (p66) protein is a Borrelia burgdorferi porin. Infect. Immun. 65:3654-3661.[Abstract] |
| 54. | Skare, J. T., C. I. Champion, T. A. Mirzabekov, E. S. Shang, D. R. Blanco, H. Erdjument-Bromage, P. Tempst, B. L. Kagan, J. N. Miller, and M. A. Lovett. 1996. Porin activity of the native and recombinant outer membrane protein Oms28 of Borrelia burgdorferi. J. Bacteriol. 178:4909-4918. |
| 55. | Sohaskey, C. D., and A. G. Barbour. 1999. Esterases in serum-containing growth media counteract chloramphenicol acetyltransferase activity in vitro. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:655-660. |
| 56. | Steere, A. C. 2001. Lyme disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 345:115-125. |
| 57. | Stevenson, B., and K. Babb. 2002. LuxS-mediated quorum sensing in Borrelia burgdorferi, the Lyme disease spirochete. Infect. Immun. 70:4099-4105. |
| 58. | Whitmore, W. M., and C. F. Garon. 1993. Specific and nonspecific responses of murine B cells to membrane blebs of Borrelia burgdorferi. Infect. Immun. 61:1460-1467. |
| 59. | Williams, L. R., and F. E. Austin. 1992. Hemolytic activity of Borrelia burgdorferi. Infect. Immun. 60:3224-3230. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| J. Bacteriol. | J. Virol. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|
| Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. | Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | All ASM Journals |
|---|