Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, November 2004, p. 6615-6621, Vol. 72, No. 11
0019-9567/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/IAI.72.11.6615-6621.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Internal Medicine/Infectious Diseases, Charité, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin,1 Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, University of Lübeck, Lübeck,2 Institute of Moleculare Medicine, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf,3 Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hanover Germany4
Received 8 March 2004/ Returned for modification 3 May 2004/ Accepted 14 July 2004
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Airway-derived organisms may be able to spread systemically in at least two different ways: (i) carried within monocytes (or possibly lymphocytes) following pulmonary infection and (ii) by direct access to the bloodstream, causing a short interval of chlamydial bacteriemia (18, 21).
The role of C. pneumoniae in atheroma formation has not been studied in detail. Chronic infection of susceptible target cells (monocytes, macrophages, endothelial cells, fibroblasts, and smooth muscle cells) as well as direct activation of endothelial cells may initiate and perpetuate a local inflammation by inducing the release of cytokines (e.g., interleukin-6 [IL-6], IL-8), increased expression of adhesion molecules (P- and E-selectins, ICAM-1, VCAM-1), and subsequent adhesiveness of the endothelium for leukocytes or platelets, key pathomechanisms during atherogenesis (5, 8, 12-14, 16, 23). Although chlamydiae may reside and replicate in different cell types and induce a chronic immune activation, little is known about the mechanisms of C. pneumoniae-induced target cell alteration. In addition, it is still unclear if these pathogen-mediated effects on endothelial cell activation are specific for C. pneumoniae or if other chlamydial species such as Chlamydia trachomatis are also able to invade and activate endothelial cells.
There is limited knowledge of the mechanisms of chlamydiae entry into host cells. The chlamydial growth cycle is initiated when an infectious elementary body attaches to a susceptible target cell, promoting entry into a host cell-derived phagocytic vesicle. Elementary bodies develop into reticular bodies, a process which could be detected metabolically within 15 min and microscopically 12 to 15 h after addition of chlamydiae to HEp-2 and HeLa-229 cells (22, 28). The length of the complete developmental cycle, as studied in cell culture models, is 48 to 72 h (1,19, 27).
The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) family members are ubiquitously expressed protein kinases activated in response to a variety of extracellular stimuli (3). They play important roles in cell activation (p38 kinase), stress response (c-Jun-NH2 kinase [JNK]), differentiation and cell growth (extracellular receptor kinase [ERK]). p38-MAPK, in particular, has been demonstrated to be a key player in the development of a proinflammatory and prothrombotic phenotype in target cells (7, 17, 26). At least four distinctly regulated groups of MAPK are controlled through three upstream kinases cascades composed of a MAPK, MAPK kinase (MAPKK, MKK, or MEK) and a MAPKK kinase (MEK kinase). Cross talk among the different MAPK results in direct modulation of downstream signal transduction pathways. Subsequent activation or translocation of transcription factors is an essential prerequisite for altered gene expression in stimulated target cells (3).
We have recently demonstrated that infection of human endothelial cells with C. pneumoniae activates different signal transduction pathways such as phosphorylation of serine/threonine and tyrosine kinases and translocation of nuclear factor-
B (NF-
B [5, 14]). The first objective of the present study, therefore, was to clearly assess the ability of C. pneumoniae to activate different endothelial MAPK pathways and to analyze the effects of activated ERK, p38, and JNK on the expression of different proinflammatory mediators. We could demonstrate that MAPK cascade-mediated induction of a proinflammatory phenotype in C. pneumoniae-infected human endothelial cells required a viable pathogen. Endothelial pretreatment with a specific p38-MAPK inhibitor reduced C. pneumoniae-mediated IL-8 secretion markedly. The second objective of our study was to elaborate the specificity of endothelial cell activation for C. pneumoniae. We therefore infected human endothelial cells with C. pneumoniae strain TW183 and C. trachomatis serovar K to compare infectivity and target cell activation with respect to IL-8 release. In addition, we ruled out the importance of a paracrine release of endothelial cell-derived mediators such as platelet-activating factor (PAF), NO, prostaglandins, or leukotrienes for chlamydia-mediated target cell activation.
(Parts of this work are included in the M.D. theses of J. Kramp, T. Petrov, and C. Walter.)
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
HUVEC and chlamydial strain. Human umbilical cord vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) were isolated from human umbilical cord veins and identified as described previously (13). Briefly, cells obtained from collagenase digestion were washed, resuspended in MCDB131-5% FCS, and seeded into 6- or 24-well plates with 1.2 x 106 or 2.5 x 105 cells/well, respectively.
C. pneumoniae strain TW183 (ATCC VR2282) was cultured and purified as described by Maass et al. (16). Briefly TW183 was grown to high titers in cycloheximide-treated HEp-2 cells. Infected monolayers were harvested from culture flasks and sonicated for 30 s. Cellular debris was removed by centrifugation at 500 x g for 10 min at 4°C. Aliquots diluted with an equal volume of sucrose-phosphate-glutamate (SPG) buffer supplemented with 10% FCS were stored at 75°C until use. Titer determination in cycloheximide-treated HEp-2 cells was performed with a thawed aliquot (in triplicate). Infection was performed as described previously (14), except that the cells were not centrifuged. HUVEC monolayers were inoculated with C. pneumoniae using a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 5 and, after incubation at 37°C, processed for further experiments at the times indicated. C. trachomatis serovar K was a kind gift of J. G. Kuipers (Department of Rheumatology, Medical School Hannover, Hanover, Germany) and was first isolated as described in reference 25.
Confocal laser-scanning microscopy (CLSM) analysis of endothelial cell infection by C. pneumoniae and C. trachomatis. After infection of HUVEC grown on Thermanox slides (Falcon Culture Slide; Becton Dickinson, Rutherford, N.J.) with C. pneumoniae strain TW183 or C. trachomatis serovar K (CTK) at an MOI of 5 for 24 h, cells were fixed with 3% paraformaldehyde for 20 min and permeabilized with 1% Triton X-100 for 15 min. To reduce nonspecific background staining, the cells were treated with 5% goat serum for 30 min in PBS before the addition of antibodies. For chlamydia staining, the primary antibody (a genus-specific monoclonal antibody; "chlamydia culture conformation system," Sanofi Diagnostics Pasteur, Freiburg, Germany) was incubated overnight at 4°C. Bound antibodies were detected with ALEXA-488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit monoclonal antibody at 4°C overnight; (Molecular Probes, Eugene, Oreg.). Endothelial F-actin was counterstained using ALEXA-546-conjugated phalloidin (Molecular Probes). After each step, the cells were washed three times with sterile PBS. Coverslips were sealed, and cells were analyzed with the use of a Pascal 5 confocal laser- scanning microscope (CLSM; Zeiss, Jena Germany).
Western blot analysis. For determination of MAPK phosphorylation, HUVEC were processed as described previously (11). Briefly, the cells were starved for 12 h in serum-free medium, stimulated as indicated, and washed twice in ice-cold HEPES buffer (pH 7.4) containing 100 mM sodium fluoride, 2 mM sodium vanadate, and 15 mM sodium pyrophosphate. They were then harvested on ice by scraping with lysis buffer containing 1 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 2 µg each of leupeptin, pepstatin and antipain per ml. After removal of the cell debris by centrifugation, cell lysates were subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (12% polyacrylamide) and blotted onto Hybond-ECL membranes (Amersham Biosciences, Freiburg, Germany). Each lane contains 80 µg of protein (ascertained by the Bradford assay). Immunodetection of phosphorylated p38-MAPK, ERK1/2, or JNK/SAPK was carried out with phospho-specific MAPK antibodies (Cell Signaling, Frankfurt, Germany). Their nonphosphorylated isoforms (Santa Cruz Biotechnologies, Heidelberg, Germany) were detected simultaneously to confirm equal protein loading. Proteins were visualized by incubation with secondary IRDye 800- or Cy5.5-labeled antibodies respectively, using an Odyssey infrared imaging system (LICOR Inc., Bad Homburg, Germany).
Immune complex kinase assays.
For MAPK immune complex kinase assays, stimulated HUVEC monolayers were lysed and equal amounts of protein lysates were incubated with 25 µl of protein A-agarose (Boehringer GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) or 1 µl of rabbit antiserum against ERK, JNK, or p38 kinase (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) per ml for 2 h at 4°C (11). After being washed, the samples were incubated with either myelin basic protein as substrate for ERK, glutathione S-transferase (GST)-c-Jun as substrate for JNK, or 3pK/MAPKAP-K3 as a substrate for p38 MAPK in the presence of 100 µM unlabeled ATP, 5 µCi of [
-32P]ATP, and kinase buffer as previously described (20). Samples were subsequently subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, blotted onto nitrocellulose, and visualized by autoradiography. Western blot analysis was performed to confirm equal loading of each MAPK.
IL-8 ELISA and cell surface ELISA for ICAM-1 expression. HUVEC were grown to confluence in 24-well plates and stimulated as indicated above (HUVEC and chlamydial strain). After incubation, expression of ICAM-1 on endothelial monolayer (cell surface enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA]) and IL-8 in supernatants (ELISA) was determined as described previously (11, 14).
Statistical methods. A one-way analysis of variance was used for data in Fig. 3 through 5. P < 0.01 was considered significant.
|
|
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
C. pneumoniae-mediated protein expression. ELISA (IL-8) and cell surface ELISA (ICAM-1) were performed 24 h postinfection to assess whether infection and activation of endothelial MAPK by C. pneumoniae was followed by IL-8 and ICAM-1 expression. Chlamydiae were added to the HUVEC medium and inoculated onto the endothelial monolayer without centrifugation. CLSM analysis confirmed a marked infection of endothelial cells 24 h postinfection (Fig. 1). Preincubation of HUVEC with 106 M U0126 (ERK1/2 inhibitor) for 15 min or 106 M SB202190 (p38-MAPK inhibitor) for 15 min reduced viable TW183-mediated endothelial cell IL-8 secretion by 40 and 66%, respectively (Fig. 4A). Coincubation with both inhibitors had an almost additive effect (84%) but did not result in complete abolition of IL-8 synthesis. Inhibition of ERK or p38 kinase had only a slight but significant effect (30% for U0126 and 18% for SB202190) on C. pneumoniae-induced ICAM-1 expression (Fig. 4B). Although phosphorylating and activating MAPK, heat-inactivated bacteria did not induce IL-8 and ICAM-1 protein expression (Fig. 4). Infection of endothelial cells with CTK (MOI, 5) for 24 h did not induce the expression of either IL-8 or ICAM-1.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Members of the MAPK family are ubiquitously expressed and activated in response to a variety of stimuli. We were recently able to identify the importance of ERK1/2 in C. pneumoniae-mediated endothelial cell activation (14). In addition, Coombes and Mahony could demonstrate that activation of the MEK-ERK1/2 pathway is important for C. pneumoniae invasion of epithelial cells (4). Our studies aimed to identify early intracellular signaling steps and demonstrated that phosphorylation and activation of all three MAPK pathways (ERK1/2, p38, and JNK) occurred within 10 to 15 min of chlamydial contact with endothelial cells. This immediate cell activation suggests that chlamydial attachment is sufficient to initiate an endothelial cell response and that bacterial uptake may not be required. Moreover, chlamydial heat treatment or UV inactivation did not reduce MAPK phosphorylation markedly, suggesting that viable bacteria may only in part be required for initial cell activation. Heat- or UV-killed chlamydiae were not able to infect endothelial cells, as demonstrated by CLSM. A profound and prolonged endothelial cell activation therefore could be initiated only by viable chlamydiae infecting the endothelial cells, suggesting that MAPK activationinitiated also by heat-resistant chlamydial membrane compoundsis insufficient, by itself, for this response. Endothelial cell activation by TW183 was followed by enhanced expression of IL-8 and ICAM-1. Inhibition of the MAPK pathway by specific inhibitors demonstrated that chlamydial stimulation of p38-MAPK and to a minor degree ERK1/2, but not JNK, appeared to be of particular importance for IL-8 secretion. ICAM-1 expression, however, could be only slightly reduced by p38-MAPK or ERK1/2 inhibition, suggesting that additional signal transduction pathways distal to MAPKs or two parallel signaling pathways are operative in C. pneumoniae-infected HUVEC.
MAPK phosphorylation and activation was already initiated by attachment of C. pneumoniae or chlamydial membrane compounds to the endothelial cell surface. Heat-resistant chlamydial membrane compounds such as LPS, chlamydial heat shock proteins (hsp60), outer membrane proteins (OMP-1 and OMP-2), and other not yet identified virulence factors are possible candidates for initiation of early signal transduction events in target cells. Preliminary experiments using a commercially available antibody against chlamydial OMP-1 suggested that this membrane component may indeed have some effects during target cell activation. TW183 preincubation with polymyxin B in order to inactivate chlamydial LPS had no effects on endothelial MAPK phosphorylation or subsequent cytokine expression (data not shown). Additional studies involving purified OMP-1, LPS, or groEL-1/hsp60 from C. pneumoniae as well as monoclonal antibodies against chlamydial LPS will help to clarify the role of these virulence factors during target cell activation.
Effects (MAPK phosphorylation and activation, expression of proinflammatory marker) were specific for C. pneumoniae since infection of endothelial cells with C. trachomatis did not induce phosphorylation of MAPK, release of endothelial IL-8, or upregulation of ICAM-1. Infection of HUVEC with C. trachomatis leads to the development of many small atypical serovar K inclusions. This "suboptimal" infection procedure could affect the results and may occur because endothelial cells are not primary target cells and so serovar Kalthough inducing a productive infectionmight not grow very well in HUVEC. However, preliminary data demonstrated that C. trachomatis serovars E and L2 induced similar results (infection but no activation [data not shown]).
After initial attachment, chlamydiae are internalized; they dissociate themselves from the endocytotic pathway by actively modifying the vacuole to become fusogenic with exocytic vesicles. Interaction with this secretory pathway appears to provide a pathogenic mechanism that allows chlamydiae to establish themselves in a site that is not destined to fuse with lysosomes (9). Further studies are required to determine the relationship between distinct steps of this chlamydial development cycle, the importance of different chlamydial virulence factors, and the initiation of host cell signaling pathways.
Overall, the data presented suggest that C. pneumoniae triggers a cascade of early signal transduction events that could lead to endothelial damage and inflammation, which in turn may result in or may promote atherosclerosis. Development of a proinflammatory phenotype in endothelial cells is dependent on the existence of viable C. pneumoniae; C. trachomatis was without effect on HUVEC activation in our system.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
The technical assistance of K. Möhr is greatly appreciated.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Beatty, W., R. P. Morrison, and G. I. Byrne. 1994. Persistent chlamydiae: from cell culture to a paradigm for chlamydial pathogenesis. Microbiol. Rev. 58:686-699. |
| 2. | Caughey, G. E., L. G. Cleland, J. R. Gamble, and M. J. James. 2001. Upregulation of endothelial cyclooxygenase-2 and prostanoid synthesis by platelets. Role of thromboxane A2. J. Biol. Chem. 276:37839-37845. |
| 3. | Chang, L., and M. Karin. 2001. Mammalian MAP kinase signalling cascades. Nature 410:37-40.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 4. | Coombes, B. K., and J. B. Mahony. 2002. Identification of MEK- and phosphoinositide 3-kinase-dependent signalling as essential events during Chlamydia pneumoniae invasion of HEp2 cells. Cell. Microbiol. 4:447-460.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 5. | Dechend, R., M. Maass, J. Gieffers, C. Scheidereit, R. Dietz, A. Leutz, and D. C. Gulba. 1999. Chlamydia pneumoniae infection induces NF- B mediated upregulation of tissue factor and PAI-1 expression in vascular smooth muscle and endothelial cells a potential link to accelerated arteriosclerotic disease. Circulation 100:1369-1373. |
| 6. | Dehio, C. 2003 Recent progress in understanding Bartonella-induced vascular proliferation. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 6:61-65.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 7. | Dong, C., R. J. Davis and R. A. Flavell. 2001. MAP kinases in the immune response Annu. Rev. Immunol. 20:55-72. |
| 8. | Gaydos, C. A., J. T. Summersgill, N. N. Sahney, J. A. Ramirez, and T. C. Quinn. 1996. Replication of Chlamydia pneumoniae in vitro in human macrophages, endothelial cells, and aortic smooth muscle cells. Infect. Immun. 64:1614-1620.[Abstract] |
| 9. | Hacksted, T., E. R. Fischer, M. A. Scidmore, D. D. Rockey, and R. A. Heinzen. 1997. Origins and functions of the chlamydial inclusion. Trends Microbiol. 5:288.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 10. | Hahn, D. L. 1999. Chlamydia pneumoniae, asthma, and COPD: what is the evidence? Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 83:271-291. |
| 11. | Hippenstiel, S., S. Soeth, B. Kellas, O. Fuhrmann, J. Seybold, M. Krüll, C. von Eichel-Streiber, M. Goebeler, S. Ludwig, and N. Suttorp. 2000. Rho proteins and p38-MAPK pathway are important mediators for LPS-induced interleukin-8 expression in human endothelial cells. Blood 95:3044-3051. |
| 12. | Kaukoranta-Tolvanen, S.-S. E., A. M. Teppo, K. Laitinen, P. Saikku, K. Linnavuori, and M. Leinonen. 1996. Growth of Chlamydia pneumoniae in cultured human peripheral blood mononuclear cells and induction of a cytokine response. Microb. Pathog. 21:215-221.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 13. | Kol, A., T. Bourcier, A. H. Lichtman, and P. Libby. 1999. Chlamydial and human heat shock protein 60s activate human vascular endothelium, smooth muscle cells, and macrophages. J. Clin. Investig. 103:571-577.[Medline] |
| 14. | Krüll, M., A. C. Klucken, F. N. Wuppermann, O. Fuhrmann, J. Seybold, S. Hippenstiel, J. H. Hegemann, C. A. Jantos, and N. Suttorp. 1999. Signal transduction pathways activated in endothelial cells following infection with Chlamydia pneumoniae. J. Immunol. 162:4834-4841. |
| 15. | Kuo, C. C., L. A. Jackson, L. A. Campbell, and J. T. Grayston. 1995. Chlamydia pneumoniae (TWAR). Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 8:451-461.[Abstract] |
| 16. | Maass, M., C. Bartels, P. M. Engel, U. Mamat, and H. H. Sievers. 1998. Endovascular presence of viable Chlamydia pneumoniae is a common phenomenon in coronary artery disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 31:827-832. |
| 17. | Marin V., C. Farnarier, S. Gres, S. Kaplanski, M. S. Su, C. A. Dinarello, and G. Kaplanski. 2001. The p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway plays a critical role in thrombin-induced endothelial chemokine production and leukocyte recruitment. Blood. 98:667-673. |
| 18. | Moazed, T. C., C. C. Kuo, J. T. Grayston, and L. A. Campbell. 1998. Evidence of systemic dissemination of Chlamydia pneumoniae via macrophages in the mouse. J. Infect. Dis. 177:1322-1325.[Medline] |
| 19. | Moulder, J. W. 1991. Interaction of chlamydiae and host cells in vitro. Microbiol. Rev. 55:143-190. |
| 20. | Pleschka, S., T. Wolff, C. Ehrhardt, G. Hobom, O. Planz, U. R. Rapp, and S. Ludwig. 2001. Influenza virus propagation is impaired by inhibition of the Raf/MEK/ERK signalling cascade. Nat. Cell Biol. 3:301-305.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 21. | Quinn, T. C., and C. A. Gaydos. 1999. In vitro infection and pathogenesis of Chlamydia pneumoniae in endovascular cells. Am. Heart J. 138:507-511.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 22. | Roblin, P. M., W. Dumornay, and M. R. Hammerschlag. 1992. Use of HEp-2 cells for improved isolation and passage of Chlamydia pneumoniae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30:1968-1971. |
| 23. | Ross, R. 1999. Atherosclerosisan inflammatory disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 340:115-126. |
| 24. | Saikku, P., M. Leinonen, L. Tenkanen, E. Linnanmaki, M. R. Ekman, M. Manttari, M. H. Frick, and J. K. Huttunen. 1992. Chronic Chlamydia pneumoniae infection as a risk factor for coronary heart disease in the Helsinki heart study. Ann. Intern. Med. 116:273-278. |
| 25. | Schmitz, E., E. Nettelnbreker, H. Zeidler, M. Hammer, E. Manor, and J. Wollenhaupt. 1993. Intracellular persistence of chlamydial major outer membrane protein, lipopolysaccharide and rRNA after non-productive infection of human monocytes with Chlamydia trachomatis serovar K. J. Med. Microbiol. 38:278-285.[Abstract] |
| 26. | Tse, H. M., S. I. Josephy, E. D. Chan, D. Fouts, and A. M. Cooper. 2002. Activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway is instrumental in determining the ability of Mycobacterium avium to grow in murine macrophages. J. Immunol. 15:825-833. |
| 27. | Ward, M. E. 1988. The chlamydial development cycle, p. 71-97. In A. L. Barron (ed.), Microbiology of Chlamydia CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, Fla. |
| 28. | Wong, K. H., S. K. Skelton, and Y. K. Chan. 1992. Efficient culture of Chlamydia pneumoniae with cell lines derived from the human respiratory tract. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30:1625-1630. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| J. Bacteriol. | J. Virol. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|
| Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. | Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | All ASM Journals |
|---|