Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, February 2004, p. 678-683, Vol. 72, No. 2
0019-9567/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/IAI.72.2.678-683.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110,1 Department of Biological Chemistry, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel2
Received 24 September 2003/ Returned for modification 27 October 2003/ Accepted 1 November 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Plasmids and transfections. The pEhActNeo plasmid (1), which contains the Neo gene conferring resistance to G418, the 5' and 3' untranslated regions from the ameba actin 1 gene, and the E. histolytica autonomous replication sequence served as the initial control vector for these experiments. Plasmid psAP-2 was derived from pEhActNeo by inserting a fragment containing 470 bp of the upstream 5' flanking region of the ap-A gene (6). Trophozoites transfected with the psAP-2 plasmid underwent selection with G418 to a maximum concentration of 60 µg/ml as previously described (6). After 2 months of selection, G418 was withdrawn and, 60 days later, AP-A expression was assessed by real-time PCR and immunoblotting. E. histolytica trophozoites used for liver challenges or human colonic xenograft challenges had been grown without G418 for at least 90 days.
RNA preparation and real-time PCR. A total of 106 E. histolytica trophozoites in log phase were harvested, washed twice by suspending them in cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and centrifuged at 430 x g for 5 min; the pellet was suspended in TRIzol, and RNA was isolated according to the manufacturer's protocol (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carslbad, Calif.). Reverse transcription was performed with 2 µg of total RNA, oligo(dT) as primers and avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase (Fisher Research, Pittsburg, Pa.). Primers for PCR were designed by using Primer Express Software (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.) and are shown in Table 1. Real-time PCR was carried out in a total volume of 10 µl with 200 nM primer pairs, 5 µl of 2x SYBR Green PCR Mastermix (Applied Biosystems), and various concentrations of cDNA template under conditions of 50°C for 2 min and 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s, followed by 60°C for 1 min by using a ABI 7700 (Applied Biosystems). Each reaction was run in triplicate.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Primers used for real-time PCR
|
SCID mouse model of amebic liver abscess. BALB/c SCID mice, male, 6 to 8 weeks of age, were used for all experiments. For studies of amebic liver abscess, 106 AP-A(-) E. histolytica trophozoites or 106 trophozoites of the parent HM1:IMSS E. histolytica strain were directly inoculated into the liver of SCID mice as previously described (7). After 48 h, animals were sacrificed, and the livers were removed and weighed. The abscessed region of the liver was cut out and weighed, and the percent liver abscessed was calculated.
SCID-HU-INT mouse model of amebic colitis. Human colonic xenografts were transplanted into the subscapular region of SCID mice (age, 6 to 8 weeks) and allowed to mature for 8 weeks to generate SCID-HU-INT mice as previously described (14). Log-phase cultures of E. histolytica HM1:IMSS AP-A(-) or the parental HM1:IMSS strain trophozoites were chilled on ice for 10 min, pelleted by centrifugation at 500 x g for 5 min, and resuspended in TYI-S-33 medium at 106 trophozoites/100 µl. To establish amebic colitis, 100 µl of the amebic suspension was injected directly into the lumen of the grafts via a 26-gauge needle. A small square of gelfoam was placed over the injection site upon removal of the needle in order to prevent leakage. The incision was closed with 5-mm Michel clips (14). At 24 h after inoculation, SCID-HU-INT mice were sacrificed, and segments of the intestinal xenografts were assayed for cytokine and myeloperoxidase (MPO) production as previously described (15). Fifteen SCID-HU-INT mice were used in each challenge group; 5 SCID-HU-INT mice served as the uninfected controls.
Cytokine assays. Protein samples for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) were prepared by homogenizing tissue at 50 mg/ml in a solution of PBS containing 1 µg each of aprotinin, leupeptin, and pepstatin A (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.)/ml. The homogenized samples were centrifuged at 12,000 x g for 15 min. Supernatants were processed as specified by the suppliers of the ELISA kits. ELISAs for interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß) and IL-8 were obtained from Endogen (Woburn, Mass.). The sensitivities were 1 pg/ml for IL-1ß and 2 pg/ml for IL-8.
MPO assay. Tissue samples were homogenized for 30 s at a concentration of 50 mg/ml in a solution of PBS with 1 µg each of aprotinin, leupeptin, and pepstatin A/ml. Samples were spun at 12,000 x g for 15 min, and the pellet was resuspended in the same volume of 80 mM sodium phosphate-1% hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (Sigma)-5 mM EDTA (pH = 5.4). Samples were subjected three times to a freeze-thaw cycle and spun at 2,000 x g for 15 min, and the supernatants were used in the subsequent assay. Samples (25 µl) were combined with 125 µl of 80 mM sodium phosphate (pH 5.4) and 25 µl of 1.28 mM 3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine dihydrochloride (Sigma) in dimethyl sulfoxide. A total of 25 µl of H2O2 in 80 mM sodium phosphate was added immediately prior to analysis to yield a final concentration of 0.24 mM and a final reaction volume of 200 µl. Conversion of the substrate was read at 650 nm. Dilutions of purified MPO (Sigma) were used as standards.
Measurement of intestinal permeability. Dextrans of approximate mass of 4,000 Da labeled with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) were purchased from Sigma and resuspended in endotoxin-free PBS at a concentration of 5 mg/ml. At 4 h prior to sacrifice, the renal pedicle was tied off to prevent excretion of the fluorophore, and 50 µl of the solution was injected directly into the lumen of the graft. At the time of sacrifice, animals were bled, and 20 µl of blood was diluted into 400 µl of 150 mM NaCl-50 mM Tris (pH 10.3) and spun at 2,000 x g for 15 min. The supernatants from this spin were analyzed on a Cytofluor 23000 fluorescent plate reader (Millipore, Bedford, Mass.)
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Real-time PCR analysis of amoebapore expression in AP-A(-) E. histolytica trophozoites and the parental E. histolytica HM1:IMSS straina
|
![]() View larger version (42K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. AP-A(-) E. histolytica trophozoites produce little detectable AP-A by immunoblotting. Lysates from AP-A(-) E. histolytica trophozoites [AP(-)] or the parental E. histolytica HM1:IMSS strain (control) were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and reacted with a polyclonal antiserum to AP-A. A prominent band at 5 kDa (the region where amoebapores migrate) is visible in the control lane but is barely detectable in the lane loaded with lysates from AP-A(-) trophozoites.
|
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. AP-A(-) E. histolytica trophozoites cause significantly smaller amebic liver abscesses compared to the parental HM1:IMSS strain in SCID mice. The mean percentage of liver abscessed from SCID mice (n = 13) infected with AP-A(-) E. histolytica trophozoites [AP(-)] or SCID mice (n = 13) infected with the parental E. histolytica HM1:IMSS strain (control) is shown. The standard deviation of each mean value is shown in the error bars. The difference in the mean percentage of liver abscessed between livers infected with AP-A(-) trophozoites compared to the parental HM1:IMSS strain was significant at P < 0.05 as determined by a two-tailed Student t test.
|
![]() View larger version (30K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Comparison of amebic colitis in human colonic xenografts obtained from SCID-HU-INT mice after xenograft infection with either AP-A(-) E. histolytica trophozoites or the parental E. histolytica HM1:IMSS strain. In all panels, values are the mean ± the standard deviation for 15 human colonic xenografts infected with AP-A(-) E. histolytica trophozoites [AP-A(-)], or 15 human colonic xenografts infected with the parental E. histolytica HM1:IMSS strain (control) or five uninfected human colonic xenografts (uninfected). Shown are values for IL-1ß, expressed as picograms of IL-1ß per milligram of total protein (A); IL-8, expressed as picograms of IL-8 per microgram of total protein (B); MPO, expressed as MPO per milligram of total protein (C); or the levels of FITC-dex in the serum of the host SCID-HU-INT mice, expressed as nanograms of FITC-dex/ml/mm2 (D).
|
We also looked for differences in intestinal permeability between human colonic xenografts infected with AP-A-deficient E. histolytica trophozoites or the parental HM1:IMSS strain by introducing fluoresceinated dextran (FITC-dex) into the lumen of the human colonic xenografts and measuring its levels in the serum of SCID-HU-INT mice 24 h later (15). Wild-type E. histolytica trophozoites damage the intestinal permeability barrier, allowing the flux of fluoresceinated dextran from the lumen of colonic xenograft into the circulation of the SCID-HU-INT mice. Uninfected human intestinal xenografts retain their permeability barrier, preventing the flow of fluoresceinated dextran into the circulatory system of the SCID-HU-INT mouse. Human intestinal xenografts infected with E. histolytica AP-A(-) trophozoites or the parental E. histolytica HM1:IMSS strain both showed damage to the intestinal permeability barrier, with detection of fluoresceinated dextran in the serum of the SCID-HU-INT mice (Fig. 3D). Levels of fluoresceinated dextran were significantly higher in human intestinal xenografts infected with the parental HM1:IMSS strain or the AP-A(-) E. histolytica trophozoites compared to uninfected human colonic xenografts (P < 0.01 for each comparison [two-tailed t test]). Although serum levels of FITC-dex were lower in SCID-HU-INT mice with colonic xenografts infected with AP-A(-) E. histolytica trophozoites compared to serum obtained from SCID-HU-INT mice with human colonic xenografts infected with the parental HM1:IMSS strain, this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.24 [two-tailed Student t test]). Histologic examination of microscopic sections did not reveal differences between sections obtained from human intestinal xenografts infected with AP-A(-) E. histolytica trophozoites and those infected with the parental HM1:IMSS strain (data not shown).
|
|
|---|
Previous studies with AP-A(-) trophozoites showed that AP-A expression was required for amebic liver abscess formation in hamsters, since no hamsters inoculated with AP-A(-) trophozoites developed amebic liver abscesses (6). In the present study we examined whether a similar effect could be seen in the SCID mouse model of amebic liver abscess. Our results confirmed the decreased virulence of AP-A (-) trophozoites, since liver abscesses were significantly smaller in SCID mice challenged with AP-A(-) trophozoites. However, unlike experiments in hamsters, the difference was not absolute, since most SCID mice challenged with AP-A(-) trophozoites still developed amebic liver abscesses. This may reflect an increased susceptibility of SCID mice to amebic liver abscesses, the different timing of liver abscess assessment in each model (48 h in the SCID mouse model versus 7 days in hamsters), or possible differences in the role of the amoebapore in each animal model.
Of greater interest was whether AP-A(-) trophozoites would show decreased virulence in the SCID-HU-INT model of amebic colitis. This model, which allows one to study the interaction of E. histolytica trophozoites and human colon in vivo, has proven useful for analyzing both host responses to infection and the role of specific E. histolytica molecules in the pathophysiology of amebic colitis (14, 15, 20, 22). Previous studies have established that infection of human colonic xenografts with E. histolytica trophozoites results in the activation of epithelial cell NF-
B, with production of inflammatory mediators, including IL-1, IL-8, tumor necrosis factor alpha, and COX-2, and the resultant influx of neutrophils and other inflammatory cells into the mucosa and lumen of the human colonic xenograft (15, 20, 23). The combination of mucosal invasion by E. histolytica trophozoites and the resultant inflammatory response leads to intestinal mucosal damage with ulceration and loss of the intestinal permeability barrier (15, 23).
The AP-A(-) phenotype in the SCID-HU-INT model of amebic colitis proved complex. All parameters associated with infection (cytokine production, neutrophil influx, and damage to the permeability barrier) were significantly higher in human colonic xenografts infected with AP-A(-) trophozoites than in uninfected human colonic xenografts, indicating that the failure to express AP-A does not render E. histolytica trophozoites avirulent. However, compared to the parental HM1:IMSS strain, we found that AP-A(-) trophozoites induced significantly lower levels of human IL-1ß and IL-8 from human colonic xenografts. Thus, in one component of infection (induction of human cytokine production from intestinal epithelial cells) AP-A(-) trophozoites are clearly less efficient than the parental HM1:IMSS strain. We and others have previously hypothesized that E. histolytica lysis of intestinal cells might result in the release of preformed mediators (e.g., IL-1
) (8) or cytokine precursors (pIL-1ß), which could initiate the inflammatory response (15). The reduced levels of these cytokines in colonic xenografts infected with E. histolytica AP-A(-) trophozoites is consistent with some role for amoebapore-mediated intestinal cell lysis in the higher cytokine levels seen with E. histolytica colonic infection.
Since both IL-1ß and IL-8 are potent inflammatory mediators, one might predict that the decreased levels of each of these cytokines seen in human colonic xenografts infected with AP-A(-) trophozoites would be associated with lower tissue levels of MPO, a marker for neutrophil influx into the infected xenograft. Levels of MPO were lower in human colonic xenografts infected with AP-A(-) trophozoites than in colonic xenografts infected with the parental HM1:IMSS strain, but this difference was not statistically significant. This may reflect the fact that the levels of IL-1ß and IL-8, although reduced, were still above the threshold needed to induce inflammatory responses. Alternatively, the levels of crucial mediators and cytokines other than IL-1ß and IL-8 may not be reduced in human colonic xenografts infected with AP-A(-) trophozoites. There was also a trend toward less damage to the intestinal permeability barrier in human colonic xenografts infected with AP-A(-) trophozoites compared to the parental HM1:IMSS strain, but again this difference did not reach statistical significance. These results, along with the histologic findings, which were essentially indistinguishable between human colonic xenografts infected with AP-A(-) trophozoites compared to those infected with the parental strain, indicate that E. histolytica trophozoites that do not express AP-A(-), show relatively little attenuation of virulence in the SCID-HU-INT model of colitis. These results contrast with our findings on the role of E. histolytica cysteine proteinases in amebic colitis, where proteinase-deficient amebas showed defects in their ability to invade into the intestinal mucosa and induced significantly less inflammation and tissue damage than the control parental strain (22).
In summary, amoebapores produced by E. histolytica trophozoites play a critical role in the formation of amebic liver abscess in the SCID mouse model of disease Our results link amoebapores to E. histolytica induction of intestinal epithelial cell cytokine production but show that trophozoites lacking AP-A expression can still cause inflammation and tissue damage in the SCID-HU-INT mode of amebic colitis. In addition to demonstrating that amoebapores may not be necessary in the pathogenesis of amebic colitis, these data are also consistent with the concept that tissue damage in amebic liver abscess may develop through pathways different than those observed in amebic colitis (17).
|
|
|---|
. J. Clin. Investig. 96:1269-1279.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2010 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»