Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, April 2004, p. 1939-1945, Vol. 72, No. 4
0019-9567/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/IAI.72.4.1939-1945.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Discipline of Pathology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia,1 Division of Genomic Medicine, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield S10 2RX, United Kingdom2
Received 29 August 2003/ Returned for modification 17 November 2003/ Accepted 29 December 2003
|
|
|---|
60% of mesophilic strains can produce lateral flagella. To evaluate flagellar contributions to Aeromonas intestinal colonization, we compared polar and lateral flagellar mutant strains of a diarrheal isolate of Aeromonas caviae for the ability to adhere to the intestinal cell lines Henle 407 and Caco-2, which have the characteristic features of human intestinal enterocytes. Strains lacking polar flagella were virtually nonadherent to these cell lines, while loss of the lateral flagellum decreased adherence by
60% in comparison to the wild-type level. Motility mutants (unable to swim or swarm in agar assays) had adhesion levels of
50% of wild-type values, irrespective of their flagellar expression. Flagellar mutant strains were also evaluated for the ability to form biofilms in a borosilicate glass tube model which was optimized for Aeromonas spp. (broth inoculum, with a 16- to 20-h incubation at 37°C). All flagellar mutants showed a decreased ability to form biofilms (at least 30% lower than the wild type). For the chemotactic motility mutant cheA, biofilm formation decreased >80% from the wild-type level. The complementation of flagellar phenotypes (polar flagellar mutants) restored biofilms to wild-type levels. We concluded that both flagellar types are enterocyte adhesins and need to be fully functional for optimal biofilm formation. |
|
|---|
A greater understanding of Aeromonas-host colonization mechanisms is needed, as at present it is not possible to identify strains in foods and water that are of public health significance. A type IV pilus ("bundle-forming pilus") has been implicated as a critical human enterocyte adhesion (15). More recently, studies have shown that Aeromonas flagella facilitate adherence to (and possibly invasion of) the epithelial cell line HEp-2 as well as biofilm formation on plastic (microtiter plate assay), suggesting that these structures may also be virulence determinants for enteropathogenic strains (7, 8, 22). Aeromonas species, like the seafood pathogen Vibrio parahaemolyticus, possess two distinct flagellar systems (a polar flagellum [Fla] for swimming in liquid and a lateral flagellum [Laf], multiply expressed, for swarming over surfaces) (8, 19, 22). Members of our laboratory have previously shown that only approximately 60% of mesophilic Aeromonas strains possess lateral flagellar genes and are able to swarm on surfaces, thus increasing the interest in the possible role(s) of this flagellar type in Aeromonas-host interactions (16).
In this study, the role of flagella as adhesins for human enterocytes was investigated by using two intestinal cell lines (Henle 407 and Caco-2) and a selection of polar and lateral flagellar mutant strains of A. caviae strain Sch3 (a human diarrheal isolate). The Caco-2 cell line, in particular, is considered a good substitute for human intestinal epithelial cells. It is derived from a carcinoma of the colon, and in postconfluent culture, has the morphological and functional characteristics of normal small intestinal cells (20). As biofilms are a feature of persistent infections and characterize up to 30% of Aeromonas gastroenteric infections (6, 9, 23), we also used an in vitro model (the borosilicate glass tube model) to further investigate flagellar contributions to Aeromonas biofilm formation and to determine some of the variables that influence biofilm formation by this organism.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Bacterial strains used for this studya
|
Motility assays (swimming and swarming). Swimming motility was assessed by the measurement of motility zones in semisolid agar (0.3% agar in Luria-Bertani broth [Oxoid]) stabs inoculated into the center of the agar (30°C, 16 to 18 h). Growth from the edge of these plates provided the inoculum for the swarming assay. Swarm plates (0.5% Eiken agar [Eiken Chemical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan] in Difco nutrient broth [Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.]) were inoculated on the surface of the agar in the center, and swarming zones were measured after incubation at 30°C for 16 to 18 h (16).
Cell lines. HEp-2 epithelial cells (American Type Culture Collection [ATCC] CCL23), Caco-2 cells (ATCC HTB37), and Henle 407 human intestinal epithelial cells (ATCC CCL6) were grown in MEM containing 5% (vol/vol) fetal calf serum. For standard adhesion assays, semiconfluent monolayers of these cell lines were grown on 12-mm-wide glass coverslips in 24-well tissue culture plates at 37°C with 5% CO2. Caco-2 cells were used at 12 to 14 days postseeding to allow cell differentiation and the expression of microvilli (20).
Adhesion assay.
Adherence to cell lines was determined as described elsewhere, with minor modifications (14). In brief, bacterial colonies from overnight TSAY plates were resuspended in MEM and adjusted (optical density at 570 nm [OD570]) to approximately 107 CFU/ml. A 1-ml aliquot of bacteria (i.e.,
107 CFU) was inoculated onto coverslip cell monolayers which were then incubated for 90 min at 37°C with 5% CO2. Nonadherent bacteria were removed by washing (five times in phosphate-buffered saline). The monolayers were fixed with 1 ml of methanol-acetic acid (3:1) for 5 min, stained with May-Grünwald and Giemsa stains (BDH, Poole, United Kingdom), and mounted for the assessment of adherent bacteria by light microscopy. All strains were tested in triplicate in each assay.
Bacterial adherence was also assessed by quantitative bacterial counts, using a method adapted from Benítez and colleagues (5). For this assay, the cell lines were grown directly in the wells of 24-well tissue culture plates. After the standard 90-min adhesion step, the monolayers were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline to remove nonadherent bacteria. The remaining cell-associated bacteria were then released from the cells by the addition of 1 ml of 0.1% (vol/vol) Triton X-100 solution (Sigma) (30 min on an orbital shaker). Serial dilutions (10-1 to 10-7) of the lysates were plated onto TSAY and the CFU were determined after overnight incubation. The percentage of bacteria recovered relative to the initial inoculum was determined for each strain.
Biofilm assay. Biofilm formation in borosilicate glass tubes (10 by 75 mm) was assessed by the method of O'Toole and colleagues, with slight modifications (21, 26). In brief, the glass tubes were inoculated with 300 µl of a 1:100 dilution of bacteria from overnight (16 to 18 h) TSBY cultures (described above). These were then lightly covered with foil and incubated for up to 30 h at 37°C without shaking. For detection and quantification of biofilm formation, the tubes were rinsed thoroughly and vigorously with water and the remaining cells were stained with 0.5% crystal violet solution for 15 min at room temperature. The crystal violet-stained biofilm was then solubilized by the addition of 100% ethanol (600 µl for 10 min at room temperature), and the OD570 of 200 µl of the resultant suspension was measured in a microplate reader (Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif.). Replicates of three to six tubes per organism were examined for each experiment, and an uninoculated broth control was included in each experiment. The growth rates of the flagellar mutant strains were assessed by measuring OD570 values and were shown not to differ significantly from that of the wild-type strain.
Statistical analysis. Differences in adherence and biofilm formation between wild-type and mutant strains were analyzed by Student's t test with Microsoft Excel software.
|
|
|---|
50% of wild-type values), irrespective of their flagellar expression phenotypes. Unlike the diffuse adhesion pattern shown by the wild-type strain (Fig. 1A), adherence by these motility-impaired mutant strains was much more random over the monolayer (not shown). |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Adhesion of A. caviae strain Sch3 wild-type and mutant strains to HEp-2 and intestinal cell linesa
|
![]() View larger version (139K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Adherence of A. caviae strain Sch3 wild-type and flagellar mutant strains to Caco-2 cells (May-Grünwald- and Giemsa-stained coverslip culture cell monolayers). (A) Wild-type strain (Fla+ Laf+); (B) lateral flagellin double mutant strain AAR6 (Fla+ Laf-); (C) polar flagellin double mutant strain AAR31 (Fla- Laf±); (D) complemented mutant strain AAR31C (Fla+ Laf+). Bars, 10 µm.
|
Aeromonas biofilm formation and the roles of flagella.
A. caviae strain Sch3 and the polar and lateral flagellar double mutant strains, called AAR31 (Fla- Laf±) and AAR6 (Fla- Laf+), respectively, were compared with respect to the ability to form biofilms in borosilicate glass tubes (n = 7 experiments). The microtiter plate biofilm assay model gave much less consistent results in our hands than the borosilicate glass tube model. In this latter system (using inocula from overnight broth cultures, with the medium unchanged), the time of peak biofilm formation by the wild-type strain varied between 16 and 30 h in different assays. Longer incubations resulted in a reduction in the biofilm reading. The highest reading occurred most commonly at about 16 to 20 h. The mean (± standard deviation [SD]) peak OD570 for the different experiments was 1.26 ± 0.47, a value comparable to peak biofilm readings obtained with Vibrio cholerae in published studies using the borosilicate assay (24, 25). Some variability was observed between assays, but biofilms formed by the flagellar mutant strains were significantly impaired (P
0.01) compared to wild-type biofilm levels in four of the seven time course experiments, while all experiments showed a trend toward this result. Figure 2 illustrates the data from one of these experiments. When biofilm formation by the double flagellar mutant strains was compared with the peak wild-type biofilm formation (normalized to 100%), biofilms were decreased by
60% for the polar mutant and
50% for the lateral flagellar mutant.
![]() View larger version (11K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Biofilm development on borosilicate glass (37°C) by the A. caviae strain Sch3 wild type () and flagellar mutant strains AAR6 (Fla+ Laf-) ( ) and AAR31 (Fla- Laf±) ( ) over time. Values shown are the means of three replicate tubes ± SD from a representative experiment. The values at 18 h were significantly different from that of the wild-type strain (P < 0.01) for both mutant strains.
|
30% when compared to the level formed at 37°C (n = 2 experiments). The preparation of inocula from 6- to 8-h cultures of bacteria on solid medium (conditions favoring maximum lateral flagellar expression [16]) did not result in more efficient biofilm formation by the wild-type strain than when inocula were taken from overnight broth cultures (as used in the above assays and for most assays below). In other sets of experiments, biofilm formation by the extended range of polar and lateral flagellar mutant strains (Table 1) was compared with biofilm formation by the wild-type and double flagellar mutant strains described above at the fixed time point of 18 h (Fig. 3). Overall, the results showed that all mutants, irrespective of their phenotype, had decreased (by >30% of the wild-type level) abilities to form biofilms. For the polar mutant strains, there was a trend towards lower biofilm formation (mean of 58%) by those strains that were unable to produce the polar flagellum (AAR31, AAR59, and AAR8) compared to strains that were still able to express it (AAR269, AAR27, and AAR150) (mean of 45%), but overall the differences were not significant (P > 0.03) (Fig. 3A). Similarly for the lateral flagellar mutant strains, although all were significantly impaired in comparison to the wild-type strain, the fliU mutant (strain AAR20 [Fla+ Laf+]), which expressed functional lateral flagella, tended to form better biofilms than the lafA1 lafA2 double flagellin mutant AAR6 (Fla+ Laf-) (P < 0.05) (Fig. 3B).
![]() View larger version (17K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Biofilm formation on borosilicate glass by polar (Fla) (A) and lateral (Laf) (B) flagellar mutant strains (18 h at 37°C). Each histogram represents the means ± SD of four experiments, with three to six replicate tubes per strain evaluated in each experiment. NM, nonmotile in swimming and swarming agar assays.
|
Complementation of the fla mutant strains (AAR8, AAR59, and AAR31), which at least partially restored flagellar expression and motilities (22), restored biofilm formation in the borosilicate model. For strain AAR31, in two of three experiments performed with broth culture inocula, the complemented strain partially (60 to 70% of wild-type levels) restored the biofilm. When the assay was performed with inocula from solid medium, complete restoration was observed (n = 2 experiments), although as noted earlier, biofilm formation by solid medium inocula was less efficient (20 to 30% decrease) than biofilm formation by broth inocula. Introduction of the plasmid vector alone did not restore the phenotypes of the mutants.
|
|
|---|
The results obtained with the fla double mutant strain AAR31 (flaA flaB) and the chemotactic motility mutant strain AAR400 (cheA) showed that the polar flagellar roles of swimming motility and initial adherence are likely to be vital for intestinal colonization. Lateral flagella are clearly also adhesins for intestinal cells, as shown by the markedly decreased cellular adherence of the laf double mutant stain AAR6 (lafA1 lafA2). In a previous investigation, members of our laboratory showed that Aeromonas lateral flagella appear to form bacterial linkages on cells and agar, as has been reported for Vibrio parahaemolyticus on agar (4, 16). This and swarming motility (discussed further below) are other mechanisms by which lateral flagella induced on surfaces or in viscous mucus could contribute to adhesion and more efficient colonization of the gastrointestinal tract by those strains which are able to produce them.
Knowledge of the factors influencing biofilm formation by Aeromonas spp. on surfaces is limited, although it is known that the development of the mature biofilm structure on inert surfaces is influenced by quorum-sensing signals (17). In this study, the influence of temperature and the kinetics of biofilm formation were investigated with a borosilicate glass model. Optimal biofilm formation occurred at 37°C, usually at about 18 h of incubation. Flagellar mutants were therefore evaluated under these conditions. The fact that biofilm formation was found to be more efficient at 37°C than at 30°C adds further weight to the possible in vivo pathogenic significance of the flagellar contributions identified in this study.
While the borosilicate glass tube model clearly demonstrated that swimming motility is essential for biofilm formation, results by this assay permit only a more cautious conclusion regarding the contribution of lateral flagella to biofilm formation. All flagellar mutations (fla and laf) resulted in a loss in the ability to form biofilms. In addition, strains that were unable to express lateral flagella were still able to form significant biofilms (
50% of the wild-type level). Moreover, the limitations of the glass tube assay (experimental variation and screening at a single time point only) may also have masked effects. Our in vitro biofilm findings are at variance with recently published reports of Aeromonas biofilm formation in a plastic microtiter plate model which concluded that lateral flagella were essential for biofilm formation by Aeromonas species (7, 8). While the investigators who conducted those studies primarily examined an A. hydrophila strain (strain AH-3), they did report preliminary studies with A. caviae strain Sch3, the strain studied extensively in this investigation (8). In contrast to our findings, no differences were found in biofilm formation in the microtiter plate model between the wild-type A. caviae strain (strain Sch3N) and the mutants AAR58 (lafA1) and AAR5 (lafA2), while the Laf-negative mutants AAR6 (lafA1 lafA2) and AAR9 (lafB) showed 32 and 35% decreases in the capacity to form biofilms. The introduction of a plasmid containing the complete laf gene cluster from A. hydrophila strain AH-3 (pCOS-LAF) into these Laf-negative A. caviae mutants restored biofilm formation to wild-type levels. Similarly, the introduction of pCOS-LAF into other laf-negative Aeromonas species led to a twofold increase in the ability of these strains to form biofilms (7). These complementation studies add weight to the conclusion that lateral flagella do contribute to biofilm formation. Complementation of the fla mutants in our study also supported the conclusion that alterations in the flagellar function(s) overall were responsible for the impairment in biofilm formation seen with the mutant strains, although it is difficult to attribute a specific role to the lateral flagellum with the complemented strains we tested. Overall, our results do nevertheless indicate that fully functional lateral flagella seem to be required for optimal biofilm formation, and to this extent they are consistent with the conclusions that can be drawn from the published studies mentioned above.
The reasons for the differing findings of the two studies are unclear, but there are differences in the biofilm methodologies used. In the microtiter plate model, biofilms were quantitated after 48 h of incubation at 30°C, the initial bacterial inocula were from solid plates, and comparisons were made with a spontaneous nalidixic acid mutant of A. caviae strain Sch3 (strain Sch3N). (In our study, biofilm formation in glass tubes, which we found gave more reproducible results than the microtiter plate assay, was assessed after
18 h at 37°C, inocula were from broth cultures, and the wild-type strain A. caviae strain Sch3 was the control.) Interestingly, we observed more significant restoration of biofilm formation in complemented strains when they were grown on solid medium rather than in broth. Yet inocula from solid medium (6 to 8 h) showed less efficient biofilm formation in our initial optimization of the biofilm experiments. The A. caviae strains Sch3 and Sch3N behaved similarly in our adhesion and biofilm assays. There are no quantitative differences in the abilities of the two strains to adhere to HEp-2 cells. I. Gryllos, of the J. G. Shaw laboratory, extensively compared both strains in original cell adhesion studies, although only results with strain Sch3N were published (22). We also found no differences between the two strains in their abilities to swim and swarm in agar assays. Biofilm formation in the tube model was only compared on two occasions, but no significant difference in the levels of biofilms formed by the two strains was found. However, we observed (Table 1) and it was previously reported that mutations in flagellar genes can decrease motility functioning, even if flagella are expressed (22). Mutations that still allow flagellar expression appear to affect the delicate balance of the organelle and alter motility and adherence (22). The nonpolar antibiotic resistance cassette used to produce the mutant strains contains an outward-reading promoter that results in the constitutive expression of downstream genes. This could well upset the regulation in the flagellar hierarchy and hence alter the optimal functioning of the flagellum. Studies with such mutant strains therefore need careful interpretation.
It is clear also that significant biofilms can form in the absence of lateral flagella (as we found). Recently, a variant strain of A. caviae (not strain Sch3, which was studied in this investigation) which had increased type IV pilus expression and defective swimming and swarming motilities was reported to form rapid and strongly adherent biofilms on the surfaces of glass flasks (3). It was previously shown that at least one Aeromonas type IV pilus type (the bundle-forming pilus [Bfp]) is an important adhesin for enterocytes (15). A second type IV Aeromonas pilus, Tap, may also be able to substitute for flagellar roles in biofilm formation (13, 18). Biofilm formation is a multifactorial process involving both pili and flagella as well as other determinants. Therefore, mutation in any one factor, especially one involved in initial adherence, may slow down biofilm formation, but this lesion is probably able to be compensated for by one of the other components. Thus, the ability of Aeromonas spp. to adapt their biofilm formation mechanisms may account for some of the variability seen in our individual experiments and possibly for differing results after growth on solid or liquid medium.
The significance of Laf-mediated swarming motility for adhesion, colonization, and biofilm formation requires further investigation with A. caviae laf motility mutant strains lafT and lafU (when available). The lafT mutant of A. hydrophila strain AH-3 showed an
50% decrease in adhesion to HEp-2 cells which was recoverable by the restoration of motility by complementation, and biofilm results mirrored this result (17). These findings suggest that the motility function of Laf may be as significant as its adhesive and associated accessory roles in the colonization of surfaces.
The relationship between in vitro biofilm assays and biofilm formation on human tissues remains to be established. Further studies of the contribution of the lateral flagellum to the pathogenesis of Aeromonas gastrointestinal infections nevertheless seem warranted.
We thank Ali Rabaan for allowing us to use his mutant strains in these studies, Bronwen Tassell and Lauri Salter for their assistance with the biofilm assays, and David Lees, TRSU, University of Tasmania, for his help in producing the figures.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»