Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, April 2004, p. 1983-1990, Vol. 72, No. 4
0019-9567/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/IAI.72.4.1983-1990.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
M. Waidmann,3,
and I. B. Autenrieth3,4
Department of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Technical University Dresden, Dresden,1 Max-von-Pettenkofer-Institute for Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich,3 Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany,4 Institute of Food Science and Nutrition, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland2
Received 3 September 2003/ Returned for modification 12 November 2003/ Accepted 14 January 2004
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The gastrointestinal tract of rodents harbors a complex microbial community comprising a multitude of bacterial species (31). As with other mammals, the numerically predominant microbes are strictly anaerobic bacteria showing fastidious growth properties. Due to the limitations of culture-based techniques, most members of the intestinal microbiota are still unknown (5). Today molecular techniques such as PCR amplification, cloning and sequencing of 16S rRNA genes, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) provide suitable tools for the culture-independent detection and identification of bacteria in complex microbial communities (3, 20). Therefore, we combined molecular 16S rRNA-based identification techniques and the IL-2-deficient mouse model in order to analyze the bacterial composition of the mucosa-associated flora in mice developing colitis. The goal of this study was to analyze and compare the mucosa-associated flora of IL-2-deficient mice and wild-type mice (used as healthy controls) in order to obtain evidence for an association of distinct bacterial populations of the indigenous microbiota with colitis in the IL-2-deficient mouse model.
|
|
|---|
Collection of colonic mucosa. The animals were killed by CO2 asphyxiation, and their colons were removed aseptically. The colons were flushed thoroughly with sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.4). Prior to snap-freezing and storage in liquid nitrogen at -80°C, the colon samples were sectioned into proximal and distal parts of the colon.
Oligonucleotide primers and probes. Oligonucleotide primers and probes were obtained from Interactiva Biotechnology GmbH (Ulm, Germany). Oligonucleotide probes for in situ hybridization experiments were labeled with either Cy3 or fluorescein. Table 1 displays the specificities and hybridization conditions of the fluorescent probes used in this study.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Oligonucleotide probes used for quantitative FISH analysis of mucosa-associated flora
|
Amplification of 16S rRNA genes. Two sets of broad-range primers were used for amplification of 16S rRNA genes. Primer pairs 27F (5'-AGA GTT TGA TCM TGG CTC AG-3')-1492R (5'-TAC GGY TAC CTT GTT ACG ACT T-3') and 63F (5'-GAG GCC TAA CAC ATG CAA GTC-3')-1387R (5'-GGG CGG WGT GTA CAA GGC-3') were used to amplify almost-complete 16S rRNA genes from the mixed template preparations (18, 22). Amplification was performed on a GeneAmp PCR system 2400 thermal cycler (Perkin-Elmer [PE] Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.). In brief, serial dilutions of the extracted DNA were used in 50-µl PCR mixtures containing 1x GeneAmp PCR buffer with 1.5 mM MgCl2 (PE Applied Biosystems), 200 µM each deoxynucleoside triphosphate, 1 µM each primer, and 1.25 U of AmpliTaq Gold DNA polymerase (PE Applied Biosystems). To remove contaminating DNA, the master mixes were filtered through Microcon YM-100 filters (Millipore, Bedford, Mass.) before addition of the template DNA. PCR cycling conditions were as follows: an initial denaturation step of 9 min at 95°C; 30 cycles of 60 s of denaturation at 95°C, 60 s of annealing at 55°C, and 2 min of extension at 72°C; and a single final extension step of 10 min at 72°C. Amplified 16S rRNA gene fragments were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis (1.5%) and purified by using the QIAquick PCR Purification kit (QIAGEN) according to the manufacturer's specifications.
16S rDNA analysis. Representative 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) libraries were established on the basis of the 16S rDNA fragments amplified from nucleic acid extracts of the colon samples of three healthy control mice with an IL-2+/+ genotype and three mice with an IL-2-/- genotype that developed colitis. Cloning of the PCR fragments in Escherichia coli was performed by using the TOPO TA Cloning kit (Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, Calif.) as recommended by the manufacturer.
The 16S rDNA inserts of recombinant clones were amplified by using the forward primer M13f24 (5'-CGC CAG GGT TTT CCC AGT CAC GAC-3') and the reverse primer M13r22 (5'-AGC GGA TAA CAA TTT CAC ACA GGA-3'). Briefly, a small amount of colony material from randomly chosen recombinant clones was picked with a sterile toothpick and directly added to 50-µl PCR mixtures of 1x GeneAmp PCR buffer with 1.5 mM MgCl2 (PE Applied Biosystems), 200 µM each deoxynucleoside triphosphate, 1.25 U of AmpliTaq Gold DNA polymerase (PE Applied Biosystems), and 1 µM primers. PCR cycling conditions consisted of an initial denaturation step (9 min at 95°C); 30 cycles of denaturation (60 s at 95°C), annealing (60 s at 55°C), and extension (2 min at 72°C); and a single final extension step (10 min at 72°C). The resulting PCR fragments were analyzed for correct length on agarose gels (1.5%) and were purified by using the QIAquick PCR purification kit (QIAGEN) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Amplicons were sequenced by using the ABI PRISM BigDye Ready Reaction Terminator cycle sequencing kit (PE Applied Biosystems) and the broad-range primer 63F as a sequencing primer on a GeneAmp PCR system 2400 thermal cycler (PE Applied Biosystems). Sequence reaction products were purified by using AutoSeq G50 columns (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Braunschweig, Germany) and analyzed on an ABI PRISM system 377 automated sequencer (PE Biosystems). To determine the approximate phylogenetic affiliations, the partial 16S rDNA sequences were compared to the EMBL and GenBank databases as described previously (34). The 16S rDNA sequences were added to the rDNA sequence database of the Technical University of Munich by using the ARB program package (Lehrstuhl für Mikrobiologie, Technische Universität München [http://www.mikro.biologie.tu-muenchen.de]). The resulting alignments were checked and corrected manually by considering the secondary structure of the rRNA molecule. The partial sequences were inserted into an existing tree by parsimony criteria, without allowing changes in the overall tree topology.
FISH. Each colon sample was divided and fixed by adding PBS-ethanol (1:1 [vol/vol]; recommended for gram-positive bacteria) or paraformaldehyde (4% [wt/vol] in PBS; recommended for gram-negative bacteria). After overnight incubation at 4°C, the paraformaldehyde-fixed specimens were washed twice with sterile PBS (pH 7.4) and finally stored in PBS-ethanol (1:1 [vol/vol]). The fixed samples were disintegrated by using a tissue grinder (Dstroy-SR-16; Biozym, Hessisch Oldendorf, Germany) and stored in PBS-ethanol (1:1 [vol/vol]) at -20°C.
Fixed samples were spotted onto the wells of glass slides, dried at 37°C, and dehydrated in 50, 80, and 96% (vol/vol) ethanol (3 min each). In situ hybridization was performed at a constant temperature of 46°C in an isotonically equilibrated humidity chamber as described previously (35). Stringent hybridization conditions for the specific oligonucleotide probes listed in Table 1 were adjusted by different formamide concentrations in the hybridization buffer. After in situ hybridization, samples were counterstained with DAPI (4',6-diamidine-2'-phenylindole). DAPI solution (100 ng ml-1) was added to the wells, and slides were incubated for 10 min at room temperature in the dark. After a rinse with distilled water, the slides were dried in the dark.
Slides were examined by using an Axiovert S100 epifluorescence microscope equipped with a 63x Plan-Apochromat Ph3 1.40 oil objective (both from Zeiss, Jena, Germany). Probe EUB338 was used as a universal probe to detect all members of the domain Bacteria and to determine the total numbers of bacteria accessible by FISH. Probe NON338 (a complement of universal probe EUB338) was used as a negative control and was included for every sample. First, the fraction of bacterial cells accessible by FISH was determined for all samples as the ratio of EUB338-positive bacterial cells to the total cell counts determined by DAPI staining. Labeling of the specific probes with one fluorochrome (Cy3; red emission) and the universal bacterial probe EUB338 with a second fluorochrome (fluorescein; green emission) allowed the probes to be applied simultaneously. Microscopic counts were determined in duplicate by performing two independent hybridizations for each sample investigated. To quantify probe-positive cells, 10 optical fields containing 50 to 100 bacterial cells per field were counted for each probe applied in each sample. The fraction of probe-positive cells was calculated as the ratio of the number of bacterial cells positive for the specific probe to the total counts of cells determined with the universal probe EUB338 in the same optical field. Upon hybridization, monochrome images were captured for each probe by using a Spot2 cooled digital charge-coupled device camera (Diagnostic Instruments Inc., Sterling Heights, Mich.) and were processed by using the MetaView software package (Universal Imaging Corporation, West Chester, Pa.).
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers. Representative sequences determined in this study have been deposited in the EMBL nucleotide sequence database under accession numbers AJ418942 to AJ419087.
|
|
|---|
In contrast to this observation, the use of different pairs of broad-range primers for amplification of 16S rRNA genes from a colon sample of a wild-type control mouse resulted in 16S rDNA clone libraries showing differences in bacterial composition (Fig. 1). The library established from an amplicon of primers 27F and 1492R harbored exclusively sequences from members of Clostridiales. Most clones analyzed represented Clostridium spp., accompanied by a few sequences from Eubacterium spp. and Ruminococcus spp. Use of primers 63F and 1387R resulted in a 16S rDNA clone library representing a much broader bacterial diversity. In addition to Clostridiales, the library included sequences from Bacteroidales, Lactobacillaceae, and other bacterial lineages. Consequently, primers 63F and 1387R were used for all subsequent studies.
![]() View larger version (13K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Effects of different primers on the composition of the resulting 16S rDNA clone libraries. The broad-range primer pairs 27F-1492R (solid bars) and 63F-1387R (shaded bars) were used to generate two different 16S rDNA clone libraries from the same colon sample of a wild-type control mouse. The resulting 16S rDNA clone libraries were analyzed by comparative sequence analysis of about 60 randomly chosen recombinant clones. Each bar indicates the percentage of clones representing a specific bacterial group in relation to the total number of clones analyzed.
|
![]() View larger version (12K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Bacterial composition in 16S rDNA clone libraries from proximal (solid bars) and distal (shaded bars) parts of the colon from an IL-2-deficient mouse. Bars indicate the percentages of sequences from Bacteroidales, Clostridiales, Enterobacteriaceae, Desulfovibrio, and other bacteria in relation to total clones analyzed. The analysis was performed for 60 recombinant clones from each of the two clone libraries.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Bacterial groups identified by comparative 16S rDNA analysis of mucosa-associated flora of wild-type mice and IL-2-deficient mice
|
![]() View larger version (11K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Bacterial composition of the mucosa-associated flora determined by comparative 16S rDNA analysis of wild-type control mice and IL-2-deficient mice. 16S rDNA clone libraries were established from three wild-type control mice (+/+) (shaded bars) and three IL-2-deficient mice (-/-) (solid bars). About 60 randomly chosen clones of each library were sequenced and compared to databases. The amount of each bacterial subgroup is expressed as a percentage of the total number of analyzed clones represented in the 16S rDNA clone library for each mouse.
|
![]() View larger version (68K): [in a new window] |
FIG.4. Whole-cell in situ hybridization of mucosa-associated microflora from IL-2-deficient mice (-/-) (left) and wild-type control mice (+/+) (right) by use of the fluorescent rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes shown. Bar, 20 µm (applies to all photomicrographs). (A and B) Probe ASF500 identified tapered rods as part of the mucosa-associated microflora in both groups of mice. (C and D) Probe BAC303 facilitated the specific detection of members of Bacteroides and Prevotella in all samples analyzed. (E and F) Probe ECO1531 identified E. coli cells in samples from IL-2-deficient mice, whereas no signals were observed in samples from wild-type mice. (G and H) The Bacteria-specific probe EUB338 was used as a positive control to prove that bacteria were accessible for the fluorescent rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes used.
|
![]() View larger version (12K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Quantification of bacterial populations in colon samples from two healthy wild-type control mice (+/+) (shaded bars) and two IL-2-deficient mice (-/-) (solid bars) by whole-cell hybridization using a set of fluorescent rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes. The specificities of the oligonucleotide probes used are shown in Table 1. Each bar represents an individual animal and reflects the mean percentage of specific bacterial populations relative to the total bacterial counts from two independent hybridizations. n.d., no bacteria detected.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Quantification of bacteria in wild-type and IL-2-deficient mice by FISH
|
In conclusion, E. coli was detected exclusively in samples from IL-2-deficient mice and not in samples from healthy wild-type control mice. All other probes used in this study identified populations of the respective target bacteria in both groups of mice. The differences in the presence of E. coli found by the quantitative FISH analysis strongly underline the findings from the comparative 16S rDNA analysis and support the differential occurrence of E. coli in the colonic mucosae of IL-2-deficient mice and wild-type control mice.
|
|
|---|
Although today the 16S rRNA approach represents the ultimate technique for a culture-independent analysis of complex microbial communities, even this method is subject to bias (41). Therefore, we performed preliminary experiments to study the effects of different methods for isolation of nucleic acids or different primers used for the amplification of 16S rRNA genes. The particular method used for the isolation of DNA had no major effect on the composition of the resulting 16S rDNA libraries. In contrast, the results from testing different broad-range primers supported the observation that primers 27F and 1492R fail to work with difficult samples (22). Furthermore, we investigated proximal and distal parts of a colon sample from an IL-2-deficient mouse in order to exclude differences in bacterial composition due to differences in the anatomic provenance of the samples. Analysis of the respective 16S rDNA libraries revealed only slight differences, indicating that the proximal and distal parts of the colonic mucosa harbor a similarly structured microbiota.
Analysis of the 16S rDNA libraries established from IL-2-deficient mice and healthy wild-type controls revealed a diverse microbiota representing a wide variety of bacterial lineages. As expected for gastrointestinal samples, most sequences represented members of Bacteroidales, Clostridiales, or Enterobacteriaceae. The presence of numerous 16S rDNA sequences showing only weak homologies to database sequences from known bacterial species supports the hypothesis that most bacteria that inhabit the gastrointestinal tracts of mammals or other anaerobic ecosystems represent hitherto unknown bacterial species (17, 26, 38). This observation was further supported by the occurrence of numerous sequences from members of Bacteroidales or Clostridiales which showed by far the highest homology to recently submitted 16S rDNA sequences retrieved from mouse gastrointestinal microbiota (31). Together with the identification of sequences from members of the ASF, these findings give further support to the plausibility of the results of the 16S rDNA analysis and demonstrate that the 16S rDNA libraries established in this study covered a broad spectrum of the mouse intestinal microbiota.
The most striking difference in the composition of the 16S rDNA clone libraries from wild-type and IL-2-deficient mice was the lack of sequences from Enterobacteriaceae in libraries from wild-type control mice. In contrast, the libraries from IL-2-deficient mice were dominated by 16S rDNA sequences from Enterobacteriaceae resembling E. coli. This was a surprising observation, because E. coli is a known member of the luminal flora of mice (40). To confirm the results obtained by comparative 16S rDNA analysis, we performed a FISH analysis to quantify the respective bacterial populations in the colon samples. The quantitative results from FISH clearly supported our data from the 16S rDNA analysis. The colonic biopsy specimens of IL-2-deficient mice harbored up to 10% E. coli, but not a single E. coli cell was detectable in the samples from wild-type control mice. Probe ECO1531 shows no exclusive specificity for E. coli. In fact, closely related members of Salmonella and Shigella spp., as well as Citrobacter freundii and Klebsiella pneumoniae, also harbor the target sequence. But the knowledge that the mice in this study were SPF renders an occurrence of these pathogenic bacteria in the samples from these mice rather improbable. Moreover, the absence of these bacteria is supported by the results of the 16S rDNA analysis. The libraries harbored exclusively sequences from Enterobacteriaceae which could be assigned to E. coli or Shigella spp. This observation legitimates the assumption that the bacteria detected in the colon samples of the mice investigated represent E. coli.
These results suggest that E. coli, although present in high numbers in the feces of mice, is absent or below the detection limit in the colonic mucosae of wild-type mice, an observation which is concordant with reports from the investigation of thin sections from large intestines of healthy conventional mice by in situ hybridization (25). The single E. coli cells identified in the thin frozen sections were seen embedded in the mucosal material overlying the epithelial cells of the large intestine, and no direct attachment to the epithelium was observed. This leads to the assumption that the absence of E. coli in the samples from healthy controls in this study was due to the pretreatment of the colon samples. After removal of the intestines, the colon was flushed thoroughly with PBS. The presence of numerous E. coli organisms in samples from IL-2-deficient mice would therefore point to a tighter attachment or invasion of the mucosa. The question arises whether the different results for IL-2-deficient and wild-type mice could be due to differences in the relative levels of E. coli in the feces of wild-type versus IL-2-deficient mice. Culture-based enumeration of E. coli in fecal samples of IL-2-deficient and wild-type mice revealed an insignificantly higher abundance of E. coli in colonic feces of IL-2-deficient mice than in those of wild-type controls (42). This result does not suggest that different relative levels of E. coli in the feces of IL-2-deficient mice and wild-type controls represent the cause for the different occurrence of E. coli in the colonic mucosae.
In conclusion, our results from 16S rDNA analysis and FISH demonstrate the high incidence of E. coli in the colonic mucosae of IL-2-deficient mice. The numbers of E. coli bacteria in the colonic mucosae of healthy wild-type mice were not only significantly lower; E. coli was almost absent. The abundance of E. coli in the mucosa-associated flora of IL-2-deficient mice, together with the observed lack of E. coli in the mucosa-associated flora of wild-type mice, implies a participation of E. coli in the development of colitis in this animal model.
The hypothesis that E. coli contributes to inflammatory disease is further emphasized by several studies. Strong evidence for a pivotal role of E. coli in the pathogenesis of colitis in IL-2-deficient mice also appears from experiments demonstrating that gnotobiotic IL-2-deficient mice monoassociated with E. coli develop severe colitis (42). Onderdonk et al. (23) analyzed the cecal flora of HLA-B27 transgenic rats with IBD and reported a rise in the numbers of E. coli and Enterococcus spp. corresponding to the presence and severity of IBD in these rats. The investigation of sera from IBD patients and matched control subjects revealed that the majority of patients with IBD had agglutinating antibodies to a higher number of E. coli O antigens, and in higher titers, than the control group (39). In addition, it was shown that E. coli and some Bacteroides strains express proteins that cross-react with pANCA autoantibodies (8). These antibodies are found in most cases of ulcerative colitis and hence reflect an immune response associated with the disease. The interpretation of immunocytochemical data gives further support to the findings described above (19). Beyond data from immunology, evidence for a pathogenic role of E. coli in IBD is also based on results from studies that demonstrate the colonization of early and chronic ileal lesions of Crohn's disease by E. coli strains. These strains were found to be devoid of virulence genes so far described for pathogenic strains involved in acute gastrointestinal diseases (37). Furthermore, the presence of adherent E. coli strains in ileal mucosae of patients with Crohn's disease was demonstrated, and an E. coli strain isolated from the ileal mucosa of a patient with Crohn's disease was proved to possess invasive ability (7, 9). These observations point to the existence of a new potentially pathogenic group of E. coli, for which the designation "adherent-invasive E. coli" has been proposed.
Despite these observations, the primary pathogenic role of E. coli in IBD is the subject of controversy due to studies reporting conflicting data. The presence of E. coli antigens in ulcers suggests a secondary infection in these lesions and does not support a primary pathogenic role (33). Furthermore, it has been shown that E. coli strains which possess adherence factors reside in the large intestine and adhere to the rectal mucosa, irrespective of the presence of colitis (43).
In addition, while monocolonization of IL-2-deficient mice with E. coli strain mpk induced colitis, monocolonization with E. coli Nissle did not (42), suggesting that specific features of a given strain determine its potential to induce colitis. Therefore, we can conclude that 16S rRNA-based approaches might be useful for addressing the composition of the microflora in IBD. However, to understand the role of a given bacterial species in the pathogenesis of IBD, additional molecular approaches including pathotyping are required.
Present address: Department of Medical Virology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. ![]()
Present address: Department of Anesthesiology and Transfusion Medicine, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»