Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, April 2004, p. 2442-2444, Vol. 72, No. 4
0019-9567/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/IAI.72.4.2442-2444.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Abteilung Parasitologie, Institut für Pathologie, Charité, Medizinische Fakultät der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 12249 Berlin, Germany,1 Laboratory of Public Health Entomology, Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 021152
Received 14 October 2003/ Returned for modification 18 November 2003/ Accepted 13 January 2004
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The composition of reservoir hosts in a site appears to affect the local genospecies distribution. B. afzelii is said to perpetuate mainly in rodents, whereas B. garinii is said to perpetuate in birds (7). No such host association, however, has been suggested for B. burgdorferi sensu stricto. Indeed, both murine and avian hosts are reservoir competent for B. burgdorferi sensu stricto in the northeastern United States (1, 19), where it is the sole genospecies that is pathogenic for humans. White-footed mice, Peromyscus leucopus, and American robins, Turdus migratorius, readily acquire B. burgdorferi sensu stricto infection from infected nymphal ticks, maintain the infection, and infect most ticks feeding on them. If both murine and avian hosts were similarly reservoir competent for B. burgdorferi sensu stricto in Central Europe, it would seem paradoxical that this variant is less prevalent in questing ticks than is B. afzelii, which parasitizes rodents but not birds. The differential reservoir competence of rodents for B. burgdorferi sensu stricto and B. afzelii remains unknown.
It may be that European rodents are more competent reservoir hosts for B. afzelii than for B. burgdorferi sensu stricto. Accordingly, we analyzed the susceptibility, the intrinsic incubation period, and the degree and duration of infectivity of these spirochetes in rodents. In particular, we compared the competence of a natural European reservoir rodent, the wood mouse Apodemus sylvaticus, to that of an experimental host, the Mongolian jird Meriones unguiculatus.
(Portions of this research were conducted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a doctoral degree [to B.K.] from the Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.)
Each of the B. afzelii and B. burgdorferi sensu stricto isolates originated from an individual naturally infected nymphal tick collected from vegetation in suburban Berlin, Germany. The genospecies of each was identified by amplification and sequence analysis of their 16S rRNA genes (18).
To infect rodents and to determine their infectivity for ticks, we permitted nymphal ticks infected by B. afzelii or by B. burgdorferi sensu stricto to feed on each host. Hosts were exposed to ticks as described previously (12). Noninfected larvae were permitted to attach simultaneously to each animal and again every 2 or 3 days throughout the first 3 weeks. This xenodiagnostic procedure was repeated every 6 weeks for 7 months thereafter. Spirochetal infection in xenodiagnostic ticks was diagnosed after molting by examining their gut contents by dark-field microscopy.
First, we determined whether B. afzelii infects rodents more readily than does B. burgdorferi sensu stricto. Twelve nymphal ticks infected by one or another spirochete genospecies were permitted to attach to wood mice, and 12 B. burgdorferi sensu stricto-infected ticks or 8 B. afzelii-infected ticks were allowed to attach to jirds. About half as many engorged ticks were recovered from the wood mice as from jirds (Table 1). At least one infected tick engorged on each of the rodents, as verified by dark-field microscopy. All hosts exposed to B. afzelii-infected ticks became infectious to at least one xenodiagnostic tick. Somewhat fewer of the rodents that had been exposed to tick-borne B. burgdorferi sensu stricto infected xenodiagnostic ticks.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Susceptibility of wood mice, A. sylvaticus, and jirds, M. unguiculatus, to infection by tick-borne B. afzelii and B. burgdorferi sensu stricto
|
![]() View larger version (21K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Infectivity to larval vector ticks of wood mice (A. sylvaticus [triangles]) and jirds (M. unguiculatus [circles]) throughout the first 3 weeks following exposure to nymphal I. ricinus ticks infected with B. afzelii (solid symbols) or B. burgdorferi sensu stricto (open symbols). SEM, standard error of the mean.
|
We observed the infectivity of rodents chronically infected by B. afzelii or B. burgdorferi sensu stricto. Infectivity generally has waned by about 15 weeks (Fig. 2). Although infectivity of B. burgdorferi sensu stricto in jirds waned to nil, that of the other combinations of spirochetes and hosts appeared to plateau. Particular rodents retain infectivity of B. afzelii and of B. burgdorferi sensu stricto long enough to perpetuate the infection between transmission seasons.
![]() View larger version (17K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Duration of infectivity to larval vector ticks of wood mice (A. sylvaticus [triangles]) and jirds (M. unguiculatus [circles]) exposed to nymphal I. ricinus ticks infected with B. afzelii (solid symbols) or B. burgdorferi sensu stricto (open symbols). SEM, standard error of the mean.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Efficiency of the natural reservoir host, wood mouse (A. sylvaticus) and the laboratory model, Mongolian jird (M. unguiculatus) to infect larval I. ricinus ticks with B. afzelii or B. burgdorferi sensu stricto over a period of 8 months
|
Our demonstration that B. afzelii is better adapted to mice than is B. burgdorferi sensu stricto corresponds to field observations. The majority of spirochete-infected, field-derived mice harbor B. afzelii infections (4, 6). Although B. burgdorferi sensu stricto is much less prevalent in Central Europe than is B. afzelii, these spirochetes have been isolated from a broad array of hosts, including various rodents and birds as well as their attached ticks (4, 15, 17). Other genospecies, such as B. garinii and B. valaisiana, seem better adapted to birds. Indeed, isolates taken from European birds most frequently prove to be one of these spirochetes (3, 5, 8, 15). Numerous ticks acquire spirochetes from pheasants experimentally infected by B. garinii, but only few ticks do so from B. burgdorferi sensu stricto-infected pheasants (9). Whereas B. afzelii appears to be well adapted to rodents and B. garinii seems to be adapted to birds, B. burgdorferi sensu stricto is less likely to perpetuate in either of these hosts. Our observations constitute the first experimental demonstration of relative competence of particular genospecies in rodents. We conclude that the more specialized genospecies, B. afzelii, appears better adapted to rodents than is the more generalized genospecies, B. burgdorferi sensu stricto.
The B. burgdorferi sensu stricto genospecies appears to behave differently in North America than in Europe. The American B. burgdorferi sensu stricto generally infects about one-third of nymphal vector ticks. It perpetuates in birds and mice (10, 11, 16). In the rodent population, prevalence of infection becomes virtually universal. In Europe, B. burgdorferi sensu stricto infects only about 3% of questing nymphal ticks (18, 20, 21) and is far less prevalent in rodents (4, 17) and birds (15). Although they are considered the same species, their host adaptations appear to differ between continents. American B. burgdorferi sensu stricto passes readily in avian as well as rodent experimental hosts (1, 19). Although the European B. burgdorferi sensu stricto form is more closely related to its American equivalent than to B. afzelii or B. garinii, it is transmitted less efficiently. The force of transmission of B. burgdorferi sensu stricto in Europe is weaker than it is in North America.
The prevalence of B. afzelii in Central Europe exceeds that of B. burgdorferi sensu stricto but is similar to that of B. garinii (18). B. valaisiana and B. burgdorferi sensu stricto infect far fewer ticks, about 1 in 11 and 1 in 14 infected ticks, respectively. These relationships most likely reflect differences in the competence of their mutually shared reservoir hosts. Indeed, we found that one of the important European reservoir hosts, the wood mouse, is far more competent for B. afzelii than for B. burgdorferi sensu stricto. Because prevalence of infection reflects the force of transmission, which in turn reflects adaptation, B. afzelii would be better adapted than B. burgdorferi sensu stricto in much of Europe. The more specialized genospecies, B. afzelii, appears better adapted to rodents than is the more generalized genospecies, B. burgdorferi sensu stricto.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»