Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, June 2004, p. 3325-3330, Vol. 72, No. 6
0019-9567/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/IAI.72.6.3325-3330.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Microbiology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia,1 Malaria Program, Naval Medical Research Center, Silver Spring, Maryland 20910,2 Institute for Microbiology, Parasitology and Entomology, Hanoi, Vietnam3
Received 24 November 2003/ Returned for modification 3 January 2004/ Accepted 20 February 2004
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Rhoptries are intracellular organelles of malaria parasites involved in the invasion of red blood cells (RBCs) by Plasmodium merozoites. Although their contents are only transiently accessible to antibodies, seroepidemiological studies have demonstrated the development of antibody responses to the rhoptry proteins RhopH3, RAP1, and RAP2 following infection (8, 12, 20, 23). In vitro growth inhibition assays have indicated that antibodies directed against the RAP1 and RAP2 proteins have inhibitory effects on P. falciparum growth in in vitro culture (6, 9, 14, 18). Moreover, immunization of Saimiri monkeys with RAP1 protected the animals from a lethal malaria parasite infection (17), suggesting that interference with the rhoptry protein function by immune responses can prevent RBC invasion.
Recently, the rhoptry-associated membrane antigen (RAMA) of P. falciparum was characterized (21). RAMA is expressed as a 170-kDa protein (p170) that contains three distinct repeat regions (R1, R2, and R3) within the N-terminal half. p170/RAMA is proteolytically processed in rhoptries to a 60-kDa mature form (p60), comprising the C-terminal part of the full-length precursor. The p60 form of RAMA is present in rhoptries of free merozoites and is discharged when the merozoites attach to RBCs, binding to the RBC membrane. The binding domain is located at the extreme C terminus of RAMA within an 82-residue region we call RAMA-E. In early ring stage parasites, p60/RAMA is found associated with the parasitophorous vacuole. Here, we show that there are at least three epitopes within RAMA recognized by sera from individuals chronically exposed to malaria and that the immunodominant epitopes are located within the middle and C-terminal parts of the protein. We also examine antibody responses to RAMA in a population of individuals living in a region of Vietnam where malaria is endemic and show a correlation between immunoglobulin G3 (IgG3) responses to RAMA-E, the region of the protein that contains the RBC-binding domain, and a state of clinical immunity to infection.
|
|
|---|
Serum samples and recombinant proteins.
The serum samples examined in this study were collected from residents living in the Khanh-Nam Commune of Khanh-Hoa Province in south-central Vietnam. Three species of Plasmodium, P. falciparum, P. vivax, and P. malariae, are endemic to this area. Surveys taken at the time of this study (1994) showed blood smear positivity rates of 14.4% for P. falciparum, 11.3% for P. vivax, and 1.0% for P. malariae. We classified older children and adults living in this area as semi-immune based on the observation that only half of parasitemic individuals described symptoms consistent with malaria and that these symptoms were often mild (e.g., headache). The study subjects and collection of serum samples have been described previously (22). Briefly, at the commencement of the study in June 1994 (T0), blood samples were obtained with informed consent from 134 volunteers aged between 9 and 55 years, followed by radical treatment with quinine sulfate, doxycycline hyclate, and primaquine phosphate. These volunteers were then monitored daily by questioning them for symptoms and weekly by obtaining peripheral blood smears by finger prick for a period of 6 months. Individuals who developed patent parasitemia over the course of the study were treated, and blood samples were collected at the time of treatment (T1) and 28 days later (T28). Parasitemia-free intervals (times to infection) were between 36 and 156 days. Of the 110 individuals who completed surveillance, 48 became parasitemic with P. falciparum, 31 became parasitemic with another species of Plasmodium but not P. falciparum, and 31 did not develop a positive blood smear. Overall, infections were detected in
72% of the individuals over the 6-month surveillance period. No volunteers had recurrent parasitemia during the 28 days of follow-up after mefloquine treatment.
Samples taken from 30 Australian individuals with no exposure to malaria parasites and hyperimmune sera obtained from 26 Papua New Guinean (PNG) individuals chronically exposed to malaria parasites were used as negative and positive controls, respectively.
The target antigens for measuring antibody responses were five recombinant RAMA fragments and the C-terminal region of RhopH3 (Ag44) (5), expressed as glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion proteins in Escherichia coli as described previously (21). An extreme N-terminal fragment of RAMA (RAMA-A) was expressed as a GST fusion protein as before (21), using primers p869 (5'-gctaggatccACATATTTAGAACAAATAAAAAATGGT-3') and p1005 (5'-tagcgtcgacGTCATTTTCCAACTTATTTATTTC-3') for PCR amplification from a cDNA template (added extensions are shown in lowercase letters and introduced restriction sites are underlined). GST was used as a negative control to determine antibody responses specific to the RAMA or Ag44 portions of fusion proteins.
ELISAs. Anti-RAMA and anti-RhopH3 reactivities were examined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as described previously (22) with the following modifications. Fifty microliters of a 1-µg/ml dilution of target proteins was used to coat the microtiter plates. Serum samples were tested at dilutions of 1:500. For the determination of antibody isotypes, the optical density (OD) was measured after 24 h of incubation with p-nitrophenyl sulfate. The cutoff for defining sera as positive was set as the mean plus 2 standard deviations of OD values for sera from Australian donors with no exposure to malaria parasites.
Data analysis. Statistical analysis of data was performed using Prism version 3.0 (Graphpad Software Inc.). Fisher's exact test was used to compare the prevalences of antibody responses. To compare antibody responses between groups, the Mann-Whitney test and the Wilcoxon test were used for the unpaired and paired data, respectively. Spearman's rank correlation test was used to determine the association of antibody responses with patients' ages and time to reinfection, as well as to correlate the responses to different target antigens. The significance thresholds for analyzing total and isotype-specific antibody response data were adjusted for multiple comparisons to maintain the chance of randomly obtaining at least one statistically significant result at 5%. Based on the formula Pt = 1.00 0.951/n, where Pt is the significance threshold and n is the number of comparisons, the significance thresholds for analyzing total antibody responses and isotype-specific antibody responses were calculated and set as for six (0.0085) or five (0.0102) comparisons, respectively.
SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting. Recombinant proteins (100 ng) were fractionated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) on 12% polyacrylamide gels and blotted as described previously (2). Recombinant fragments A and B of merozoite surface protein 4 (MSP4) were kindly provided by Lina Wang. Pooled hyperimmune human sera were used as primary antibodies and detected with anti-human immunoglobin conjugated with horseradish peroxidase and developed as described previously (2).
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (41K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. (A) Schematic representation of RAMA protein and expressed fragments. Boxed and shaded are the signal peptide (residues 1-15); the repeat regions R1 (residues 96 to 225), R2 (residues 260 to 314), and R3 (residues 319 to 373); and the C-terminal peptide for glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchoring (residues 841 to 861). The positions of expression constructs (in residues) are indicated. (B) Epitope mapping. Shown is an immunoblot with immune human sera on 100 ng of recombinant proteins. Lane 1, RAMA-A; lane 2, RAMA-B; lane 3, RAMA-C; lane 4, RAMA-D; lane 5, RAMA-E; lane 6, Ag44; lane 7, MSP4/A; lane 8, MSP4/B; lane 9, GST. The positions of molecular mass markers are shown on the left.
|
Prevalences and magnitudes of antibody responses. A total of 286 serum samples obtained from 119 individuals during the course of the field study were tested for reactivity against recombinant fragments of RAMA. As summarized in Table 1, a high prevalence of positive sera reacting at high magnitude with the C-terminal part of RAMA, fragments D and E, was found. Reactivity was also observed to a lesser extent with fragment C, which contains the R3 repeat region. The level of antibody responses to fragment B of RAMA, comprising the R2 repeat region (21), was very low, although the percentage of positive sera was quite high. Interestingly, a high cutoff value, based on the antibody responses of individuals with no history of exposure to malaria, was observed for fragment A of RAMA.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Prevalences and magnitudes of anti-RAMA antibody responses in study populationa
|
Association of antibody responses with antimalarial protection. Not all individuals participating in the study became parasitemic with P. falciparum during the surveillance period, and the observed lack of infection may reflect higher levels of protective antibodies in these subjects. To determine whether anti-RAMA antibodies are associated with the clinically immune state, we compared the antibody responses of the susceptible group (48 individuals who acquired P. falciparum parasitemia) and the protected group (31 individuals who did not develop a Plasmodium-positive blood smear) to RAMA fragments. As summarized in Table 2, there were no statistically significant differences in either the prevalence or magnitude of the total antibody response to any RAMA fragment in the two groups. However, as a general trend, antibody responses in the protected group tended to be higher than in the susceptible individuals, particularly against fragment RAMA-E.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Comparison of antibody responses of individuals susceptible to and protected against P. falciparum infection during the course of the study
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Comparison of antibody isotypes in responders to RAMA-D among individuals susceptible to and protected against P. falciparum infection during the course of the study
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 4. Comparison of antibody isotypes in responders to RAMA-E among individuals susceptible to and protected against P. falciparum infection during the course of the study
|
![]() View larger version (17K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Comparison of antibody responses of susceptible patients to RAMA fragments at three time points. The bars represent median OD values, with the error bars indicating the lower and upper quartiles.
|
|
|
|---|
We tested 286 serum samples from 119 individuals living in an area of Vietnam where malaria is endemic and constantly exposed to Plasmodium parasites. The analysis of total antibody responses agrees with our initial observations that the epitopes within the C-terminal part of RAMA are strongly immunogenic. The highest prevalence and magnitude were observed for antibody responses to fragments D and E of RAMA, present in the p60 form of the native protein, and in both cases the cytophilic IgG1 and IgG3 isotypes were the predominant antibody subclasses. High antibody responses to fragment C of RAMA, which contains the R3 repeat region, were also observed. Repeats have been implicated in humoral responses to malaria parasite antigens (15, 16), and the presence of a repetitive epitope within RAMA-C might explain the high level of antibody response to this fragment. Interestingly, we observed much lower serum reactivities to fragment RAMA-B, containing the R2 repeat region, indicating that the mere presence of repeats is not sufficient for significant immunogenicity. It was interesting to observe that relatively high antibody responses to fragment RAMA-A were detected in sera from individuals with no history of exposure to malaria parasites, resulting in a high cutoff value and thus a low prevalence of malaria-associated anti-RAMA-A antibodies. This could suggest the presence of an epitope that is highly cross-reactive with commonly encountered antigens.
To determine whether levels of antibodies to RAMA or Ag44 epitopes are associated with a state of resistance to infection, we compared the antibody responses of two groups of individuals in the study population. The protected group contained individuals who had no detectable parasites in regular blood smears over the course of the field study and who therefore appeared resistant to infection (parasitemia). The lack of a positive blood smear is unlikely to be due to a lack of exposure, since all participating individuals lived within a small community with a high incidence of infections (determined by a field survey to be 156 infections per 100 persons per year) and had been exposed to malaria parasites repeatedly. The susceptible group included individuals who became parasitemic with P. falciparum during the course of the field study and were therefore clearly not immune. Individuals who became parasitemic with other species of malaria parasites were excluded from the study, since this is a confounding factor that may limit the capacity of P. falciparum to coinfect either by raising cross-reactive immune responses or by nonspecific mechanisms that add up in a density-dependent manner (4). Overall, antibody responses in protected individuals tended to be slightly higher, particularly responses to fragment E, which is the functional region of the molecule involved in RBC binding. More importantly, we observed significantly higher levels of cytophilic IgG3-type antibodies in the protected group, as well as higher ratios of cytophilic to noncytophilic and of IgG3 to IgG1 isotypes. Previously, a number of studies had indicated an association between IgG-type antibody responses to the rhoptry protein RAP1 and lower parasitemia rates or protection from P. falciparum infection (1, 11, 13). The predominance of cytophilic isotypes, and more specifically the IgG3 class, rather than a total antibody level have been shown to be associated with antimalarial protection (3). Our results indicate that in the study population there was a clear link between the isotype distribution of cytophilic classes, a higher level of anti-RAMA-E IgG3-type antibodies, and the state of immunity to P. falciparum infection. The most likely mechanism would be that the anti-RAMA-E antibodies interfere with binding to RBCs and hinder the merozoites' entry into the host cell.
When we analyzed changes in serum reactivity associated with P. falciparum infection, we observed significantly increased antibody responses to fragment RAMA-E and to Ag44 28 days postinfection compared to T1. Given the likelihood that individuals in the study population had been exposed to various malaria parasites' antigens on numerous occasions prior to the study, this result indicates that epitopes within fragment E of RAMA and within Ag44 actively and strongly boost humoral responses with each consecutive exposure and that the induced antibodies last for at least 28 days. A similar observation was made for RAP1, where increased antibody levels have been associated with exposure to P. falciparum and persisted for up to 30 days postinfection (10). Our results suggest that RAMA-E epitopes may be important for inducing more efficient antimalarial responses which develop over a period of time with consecutive malaria parasite infections as opposed to epitopes within other regions of RAMA. Ag44 represents the C-terminal portion of RhopH3, and a previous seroepidemiological study indicated that this region is strongly immunogenic and that ongoing P. falciparum infection results in significant increases in antibody responses to the antigen (23). Monoclonal antibodies directed against epitopes within Ag44 showed growth-inhibitory properties in in vitro assays (6, 7). As in vitro RBC-binding assays indicated that Ag44 harbors an RBC-binding domain (21), there appears to be a link between protection and responses to RBC-binding domains for both RAMA and RhopH3.
In summary, our study shows that RAMA induces specific immune responses in individuals repetitively exposed to P. falciparum infection. At least three epitopes are present, with immunodominant epitopes located within the p60 mature form of RAMA, which is released into the bloodstream and exposed to antibody binding. Antibodies of the IgG3 isotype directed to fragment E are strongly associated with resistance to infection in our study population. Fragment E contains the RBC-binding domain and may be involved in the process of merozoite entry and the formation of the parasitophorous vacuole (21). As such, RAMA-E might have potential as a candidate for inclusion in an antimalarial vaccine. As it is only 82 residues, further mapping studies may identify a shorter region suitable for addition to a multiepitopic vaccine antigen. To further evaluate its efficacy, studies assessing the humoral responses to RAMA-E in individuals from other areas where malaria is endemic, in vitro growth inhibition assays with specific anti-RAMA-E antibodies, and challenge experiments in laboratory animals using recently identified rodent RAMA homologues (A. E. Topolska and R. L. Coppel, submitted for publication) are under way.
This work was supported by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), the National Institutes of Health (grant DK-32094), the Howard Hughes Medical Institute International Scholars Program, and the Naval Medical Research and Development Command Work Units STO F6.1 61110210101.S13.BFX and STO F6.2 622787A.0101.870.EFX. A.E.T. is a recipient of the Monash Graduate Scholarship.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»