This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Borucki, M. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Borucki, M. K.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Infection and Immunity, July 2004, p. 4318-4321, Vol. 72, No. 7
0019-9567/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/IAI.72.7.4318-4321.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Oral Inoculation of A/J Mice for Detection of Invasiveness Differences between Listeria monocytogenes Epidemic and Environmental Strains

So Hyun Kim,1,2,3 Marlene K. Bakko,1,2 Don Knowles,1,2 and Monica K. Borucki1,2*

Animal Disease Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Pullman, Washington 99164-6630,1 Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164-7040,2 Department of Microbiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and School of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea3

Received 3 February 2004/ Returned for modification 10 March 2004/ Accepted 29 March 2004


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
Four-week-old Harlan A/J mice were orally infected with six epidemic and six environmental strains of Listeria monocytogenes. Epidemic strains were significantly more invasive as a group than were environmental strains (P < 0.05), and the intestines of some mice infected with epidemic strains had extensive hemorrhage. Mice inoculated with epidemic strains were significantly more likely to become systemically infected than mice inoculated with environmental strains (P < 0.01).


arrow
TEXT
 
Listeria monocytogenes is a food-borne bacterial pathogen that can cause severe disease and high mortality in humans and animals (27). Although most epidemics are caused by L. monocytogenes serotype 4b, serotype 1/2a is the most common serotype isolated from food (4). This implies different virulence potential according to serotype. Other factors that may affect infectivity are the infective dose, survival of the bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract, and host immunity (15, 27). Penetration of the intestinal barrier is the primary step for the infection (16), and subsequent invasion of organs such as the liver and spleen are also critical for establishing a systemic infection (27). Therefore, it is important to determine the ability of L. monocytogenes strains to penetrate the intestinal mucosa and invade organs by using an in vivo model to assess invasiveness.

L. monocytogenes infection elicits a comparable innate and acquired cellular immune response in humans and rodents; therefore, the murine model of L. monocytogenes infection has been widely used (1). Most previous mouse models used to assess strain invasiveness used intraperitoneal or intravenous inoculation of immunocompetent or immunocompromised mice (9, 23, 24, 26). However, most human infections are acquired orally, and these models do not address survival and translocation in the gut. Furthermore, studies describing intragastric infection of mice or guinea pigs required relatively high numbers of bacteria (109 CFU) (2, 3, 16, 18, 26).

Recently, an A/J mouse model in which intragastric inoculation was used was described by Czuprynski et al. (6). It was found that 6- to 8-week-old A/J mice develop systemic infection following intragastric inoculation by using numbers of organisms similar to what is detected in L. monocytogenes-contaminated food products. However, only two strains (Scott A and EGD) were tested (6), and sodium pentobarbital was used for anesthesia, which was later shown to increase susceptibility to infection (7). Therefore, it is important to test the efficacy of this model by using more strains and an alternative means of anesthesia.

Mice. A previous study (22) tested NCR mice of various ages to assess the effect of mouse weight on the L. monocytogenes infection and demonstrated that smaller mice were more sensitive to oral infection and further suggested the use of 14- to 15-g mice (approximately 4 weeks old) for L. monocytogenes infection. Therefore, 4-week-old A/J mice (Harlan Sprague-Dawley, Indianapolis, Ind.) were used in this study (average weight, 14.1 ± 1.6 g). Mice were divided randomly (six mice per group), housed under sterile microisolator caps, and acclimated for 5 days before experiments were initiated. Mice were given sterile food and water ad libitum except during the 5 h before inoculation, when food was removed.

Oral inoculation. Prior to infection, mice were anesthetized by isoflurane gas (1 liter/min) and an inoculum (106 CFU/ml, log-phase growth) was introduced intragastrically in a total volume of 0.1 ml by using a stainless steel feeding needle (22-gauge by 1.5 in.; Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, Pa.) attached to a 1-ml syringe. Six epidemic strains and six environmental strains were tested (Table 1). For controls, mice were inoculated with sterile phosphate-buffered saline. Seventy-two hours after infection, the mice were euthanized with ketamine (0.06 mg) and xylaxine (0.03 mg), followed by cervical dislocation. The liver and spleen were removed aseptically, weighed, and homogenized in 1 ml of cold, sterile phosphate-buffered saline. Homogenates were diluted in sterile phosphate-buffered saline, plated on blood agar, and incubated at 37°C for 48 h. Colonies phenotypically characteristic of L. monocytogenes were spotted onto ALOA plates (Microbiology International, Frederick, Md.) and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. Phospholipase-positive colonies were counted, and the number of CFU per gram was calculated for each organ. Data were expressed as log10 CFU of L. monocytogenes per gram of tissue, and both general linear model analysis of variance and unpaired t tests (NCSS Statistical Software) were performed to compare the differences between epidemic and environmental strains.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. L. monocytogenes strains used in this study and oral infection results

Strain invasiveness. A greater percentage of mice in groups inoculated with epidemic strains were infected (average, 77%) than were mice inoculated with environmental strains (average, 32%; P < 0.01) (Table 2). The L. monocytogenes counts in the livers and spleens of mice infected with epidemic strains were significantly higher than those of mice inoculated with environmental strains (P < 0.05) (Fig. 1A). Most mice infected with environmental strains had weight gain, while the majority of mice infected with epidemic strains had weight loss (P < 0.05). In addition, the intestines of five mice infected with epidemic strains (two mice with LMB469, one mouse with LMB472, and two mice with LMB504) had extensive hemorrhage. The average bacterial numbers in the livers and spleens of mice with extensive intestinal hemorrhage were significantly higher than those of mice with no hemorrhage (P < 0.05).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 2. Percentage of systemically infected mice following oral inoculation with L. monocytogenes strains



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 1. (A) Epidemic strains were significantly more invasive than environmental strains in both the liver and spleen of 4-week-old Harlan A/J mice (P < 0.05). (B) Serotype 4b strains (n = 7) were generally more invasive than non-serotype 4b strains (n = 5). (C) Taconic mice were significantly more sensitive than Harlan mice to L. monocytogenes infection (P < 0.05). The data are presented as the mean (log10 CFU per gram) ± the standard error.

Mice were not systemically infected following oral inoculation with LMB508, a noninvasive strain that caused an outbreak of human gastroenteritis in 1994 (Table 1) (8). These results suggest that A/J mice can be used to differentiate invasive strains from noninvasive strains.

The relationship between serotype 4b and epidemics led us to hypothesize that serotype 4b strains are more invasive than non-serotype 4b strains. Although the average CFU per gram of liver and spleen was higher for mice infected with 4b strains than those infected with non-4b strains (120 and 12.5 times higher, respectively), the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.28) (Fig. 1B). Additionally, one environmental 4b strain (LMB446) had a high infection rate, while a different environmental 4b strain (LMB429) had a low infection rate (Table 2). These data suggest that although serotype is related to epidemic outbreaks, it is not the only factor involved in outbreaks.

Susceptibility of mice from different vendors to L. monocytogenes infection. During the course of the study, it became necessary to order A/J mice from a different vendor (Taconic, Germantown, N.Y.), and a difference in susceptibility of mice from the new vendor was observed. In order to determine if the observed susceptibility difference between mice from different vendors was significant, mice were purchased from both Harlan and Taconic and inoculated orally with 105 CFU (0.1 50% lethal dose) of four epidemic strains (LMB469, LMB472, LMB498, and LMB503) and four environmental strains (LMB437, LMB446, LMB582, and LMB622). Taconic A/J mice were significantly more susceptible than Harlan A/J mice to L. monocytogenes infection (P < 0.05) (Fig. 1C). Additionally, there were no significant differences in invasiveness between epidemic and environmental strains and between 4b and non-4b serotypes in Taconic A/J mice.

Histopathology. To test the accuracy of the culture system, a subset of Harlan (n = 30) and Taconic (n = 36) A/J mice were examined by histopathology. Livers and spleens with one to three areas of necrosis, four to seven areas of necrosis, or more than eight areas of multifocal necrosis were categorized as mild, moderate, or severe, respectively. The average bacterial numbers in the livers and spleens of A/J mice correlated with the degree of observed necrosis (r = 1.0; P < 0.001). Necrosis in the livers and spleens of Taconic A/J mice was greater than that of Harlan A/J mice (data not shown).

Conclusion. In summary, 4-week-old Harlan A/J mice were systemically infected after oral inoculation with L. monocytogenes strains with a relatively low dose. Epidemic strains were significantly more invasive as a group than environmental strains and caused extensive hemorrhage in the intestines of some mice. A/J mice are relatively inefficient at mobilizing inflammatory cells, initiate a slower and less exuberant production of inflammatory cytokines, and have diminished anti-Listeria phagocytic activity; however, they are not considered an immunodeficient strain (6, 10, 14). Additionally, the macrophage-mediated immune response of younger mice against L. monocytogenes infection is not fully developed (7, 20). Therefore, it is possible that the 4-week-old A/J mice used in this study were more sensitive to L. monocytogenes infection than the mice used in other studies due age- and strain-related differences. The results of this study suggest that 4-week-old Harlan A/J mice are an appropriate in vivo model for investigating the oral infectivity and invasiveness of L. monocytogenes strains.


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
Funding was provided by USDA Agricultural Research Service (CWU 5348-32000-017-00D) and the Agricultural Animal Health Program (College of Veterinary Medicine, Washington State University).

We gratefully acknowledge the excellent technical assistance provided by Edward Kuhn, Edith Orozco, and James Murnighan. L. monocytogenes isolates were kindly provided by Lewis Graves (CDC), Karen Jinneman (FDA), Lisa Gorski (USDA-ARS), and Martin Wiedmann (Cornell University).


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: USDA-ARS, 3003 ADBF, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-6630. Phone: (509) 335-7407. Fax: (509) 335-8328. E-mail: mborucki{at}vetmed.wsu.edu. Back

Editor: D. L. Burns


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Abram, M., D. Schlüter, D. Vuckovic, B. Wraber, M. Doric, and M. Deckert. 2003. Murine model of pregnancy-associated Listeria monocytogenes infection. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 35:177-182.[CrossRef][Medline]
    2. 2
  2. Barbour, A. H., A. Rampling, and C. E. Hormaeche. 1996. Comparison of the infectivity of isolates of Listeria monocytogenes following intragastric and intravenous inoculation in mice. Microb. Pathog. 20:247-253.[CrossRef][Medline]
    3. 3
  3. Barbour, A. H., A. Rampling, and C. E. Hormaeche. 2001. Variation in the infectivity of Listeria monocytogenes isolates following intragastric inoculation of mice. Infect. Immun. 69:4657-4660.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    4. 4
  4. Buncic, S., S. M. Avery, J. Rocourt, and M. Dimitrijevic. 2001. Can food-related environmental factors induce different behavior in two key serovars, 4b and 1/2a, of Listeria monocytogenes? Int. J. Food Microbiol. 65:201-212.[CrossRef][Medline]
    5. 5
  5. Czuprynski, C. J., N. G. Faith, and H. Steinberg. 2002. Ability of the Listeria monocytogenes strain Scott A to cause systemic infection in mice infected by the intragastric route. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:2893-2900.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    6. 6
  6. Czuprynski, C. J., N. G. Faith, and H. Steinberg. 2003. A/J mice are susceptible and C57BL/6 mice are resistant to Listeria monocytogenes infection by intragastric inoculation. Infect. Immun. 71:682-689.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    7. 7
  7. Czuprynski, C. J., N. G. Faith, H. Steinberg, and B. Neudeck. 2003. Sodium pentobarbital anesthesia transiently enhances the severity of infection following intragastric, but not intravenous, inoculation of Listeria monocytogenes in mice. Microb. Pathog. 35:81-86.[CrossRef][Medline]
    8. 8
  8. Dalton, C. B., C. C. Austin, J. Sobel, P. S. Hayes, W. F. Bibb, L. M. Graves, B. Swaminathan, M. E. Proctor, and P. M. Griffin. 1997. An outbreak of gastroenteritis and fever due to Listeria monocytogenes in milk. N. Engl. J. Med. 336:100-105.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    9. 9
  9. Gaillot, O., E. Pellegrini, S. Bregenholt, S. Nair, and P. Berche. 2000. The ClpP serine protease is essential for the intracellular parasitism and virulence of Listeria monocytogenes. Mol. Microbiol. 35:1286-1294.[CrossRef][Medline]
    10. 10
  10. Gervais, F., M. Stevenson, and E. Skamene. 1984. Genetic control of resistance to Listeria monocytogenes during enteric infection in TNF/LT alpha–/– mice. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 205:179-183.[CrossRef]
    11. 11
  11. Gilbert, R. J., J. McLauchlin, and S. K. Velani. 1993. The contamination of paté by Listeria monocytogenes in England and Wales in 1989 and 1990. Epidemiol. Infect. 110:543-551.[Medline]
    12. 12
  12. Hurd, S., et al. 1998. Multistate outbreak of listeriosis—United States, 1998. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 47:2451-2455.
    13. 13
  13. Hurd, S., et al. 2000. Multistate outbreak of listeriosis—United States, 2000. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 49:1129-1230.[Medline]
    14. 14
  14. Iizawa, Y., R. D. Wagner, and C. J. Czuprynski. 1993. Analysis of cytokine mRNA expression in Listeria-resistant C57BL/6 and Listeria-susceptible A/J mice during Listeria monocytogenes infection. Infect. Immun. 61:3739-3744.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    15. 15
  15. Jaradat, Z. W., and A. K. Bhunia. 2003. Adhesion, invasion, and translocation characteristics of Listeria monocytogenes serotypes in Caco-2 cell and mouse models. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:3640-3645.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    16. 16
  16. Lecuit, M., S. Vandormael-Pournin, J. Lefort, M. Huerre, P. Gounon, C. Dupuy, C. Babinet, and P. Cossart. 2001. A transgenic model for listeriosis: role of internalin in crossing the intestinal barrier. Science 292:1722-1725.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    17. 17
  17. Linnan, M. J., L. Mascola, X. D. Lou, V. Goulet, S. May, C. Salminen, D. W. Hird, M. L. Yonekura, P. Hayes, R. Weaver, A. Audurier, B. D. Plikaytis, S. L. Fannin, A. Kleks, and C. V. Broome. 1988. Epidemic listeriosis associated with Mexican-style cheese. N. Engl. J. Med. 319:823-828.[Abstract]
    18. 18
  18. Macro, A. J., J. Altimira, N. Prats, S. Lopez, L. Dominguez, M. Domingo, and V. Briones. 1997. Penetration of Listeria monocytogenes in mice infected by the oral route. Microb. Pathog. 23:255-263.[CrossRef][Medline]
    19. 19
  19. Morris, I. J., and C. D. Ribeiro. 1991. The occurrence of Listeria species in pté: the Cardiff experience 1989. Epidemiol. Infect. 107:111-117.[Medline]
    20. 20
  20. Ohara, R., M. Mitsuyama, M. Miyata, and K. Nomoto. 1985. Ontogeny of macrophage-mediated protection against Listeria monocytogenes. Infect. Immun. 48:763-768.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    21. 21
  21. Ohio Department of Heath, et al. 1999. Update: multistate outbreak of listeriosis—United States, 1998-1999. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 47:1117-1118.[Medline]
    22. 22
  22. Pine, L., G. B. Malcolm, and B. D. Plikaytis. 1990. Listeria monocytogenes intragastric and intraperitoneal approximate 50% lethal doses for mice are comparable, but death occurs earlier by intragastric feeding. Infect. Immun. 58:2940-2945.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    23. 23
  23. Raybourne, R. B. 2002. Virulence testing of Listeria monocytogenes. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. Int. 85:516-523.
    24. 24
  24. Roche, S. M., P. Velge, E. Bottreau, C. Durier, N. Marquet-van der Mee, and P. Pardon. 2001. Assessment of the virulence of Listeria monocytogenes: agreement between a plaque-forming assay with HT-29 cells and infection of immunocompetent mice. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 68:33-44.[CrossRef][Medline]
    25. 25
  25. Schlech, W. F., P. M. Lavigne, R. A. Bortolussi, A. C. Allen, E. V. Haldane, A. J. Wort, A. W. Hightower, S. E. Johnson, S. H. King, E. S. Nicholls, and C. V. Broome. 1983. Epidemic listeriosis: evidence for transmission by food. N. Engl. J. Med. 308:203-206.[Medline]
    26. 26
  26. Sleator, R. D., C. G. M. Gahan, and C. Hill. 2001. Mutations in the listerial proB gene leading to proline overproduction: effects on salt tolerance and murine infection. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:4560-4565.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    27. 27
  27. Vázquez-Boland, J. A., M. Kuhn, P. Berche, T. Chakraborty, G. Domínguez-Bernal, W. Goebel, B. González-Zorn, J. Wehland, and J. Kreft. 2001. Listeria pathogenesis and molecular virulence determinants. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 14:584-640.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Infection and Immunity, July 2004, p. 4318-4321, Vol. 72, No. 7
0019-9567/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/IAI.72.7.4318-4321.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Sleator, R. D., Watson, D., Hill, C., Gahan, C. G. M. (2009). The interaction between Listeria monocytogenes and the host gastrointestinal tract. Microbiology 155: 2463-2475 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Borucki, M. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Borucki, M. K.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»