Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, August 2004, p. 4884-4887, Vol. 72, No. 8
0019-9567/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/IAI.72.8.4884-4887.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Research Center,1 Technology Development, Chiron Vaccines, 53100 Siena, Italy2
Received 20 February 2004/ Returned for modification 1 April 2004/ Accepted 24 April 2004
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The carrier proteins used in licensed vaccines are tetanus toxoid (TT), diphtheria toxoid (DT), the nontoxic mutant of diphtheria toxin, CRM197, and the outer membrane protein complex from group B N. meningitidis. Since more conjugated vaccines are being introduced into the medical practice, infants could receive multiple injections of the carrier protein, either as a vaccine itself (e.g., TT or DT) or as a protein present in the conjugate vaccine. Carrier proteins are highly immunogenic at the B- and T-cell level, and carrier overload may induce immune suppression in primed individuals (7). This phenomenon, termed carrier-induced epitopic suppression, is thought to be due to carrier-specific antibodies and intramolecular antigenic competition (9). This has been well documented in animals (4, 11), although it remains controversial in humans (15). Ideally carrier proteins should induce strong helper effect to the conjugated B-cell epitope (e.g., polysaccharide) without inducing important antibody response against itself. The use of universal epitopes, which are immunogenic in the context of most major histocompatibility complex class II molecules, is one approach towards this goal (1). Universal epitopes have been identified within TT and other proteins (see below) (8), and their use as carrier proteins has been tested in mice and in humans (13, 18).
It was previously shown that a genetically engineered protein, termed N19, expressed in Escherichia coli and consisting of several human CD4+ T-cell universal epitopes, behaves as a strong carrier when conjugated to Hib polysaccharide (10). In the present work, we evaluated the strength of the helper effect of N19 to induce protective antibodies against MenC compared to a conjugate vaccine containing CRM197, which confers protection in infants (3).
The universal CD4+ T-cell epitopes contained within the N19 recombinant protein are shown in Table 1. All epitopes are present in double copies, except for the one from the influenza matrix protein (10). N19 recombinant polyepitope was expressed in E. coli and purified by immobilized metal affinity chromatography as described previously (10). MenC oligosaccharide and CRM-MenC conjugate were prepared as previously described (6). A similar procedure was used for the conjugation of MenC to N19 protein. The saccharide content of each conjugate was quantified by sialic acid determination (17) and the protein content by micro bicinchoninic acid assay (Pierce, Rockford, Ill.). The sugar-to-protein ratio (wt/wt) was 0.4 in the N19-MenC conjugate and 0.49 in the CRM-MenC vaccine.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Universal human CD4+ T-cell epitopes contained in the N19 recombinant polyepitopea
|
Titration of MenC and carrier (N19 and CRM197)-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) was performed on individual sera as described previously (5). Maxisorp 96-well flat-bottom plates (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) were coated overnight at 4°C with 5 µg of methylated human serum albumin/ml and 5 µg of purified MenC/ml in phosphate-buffered saline. Other plates were coated with 2 µg of N19 or CRM197 carrier protein/ml in phosphate-buffered saline. Antigen-specific IgG was revealed with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Sigma Chemical Co., SA Louis, Mo.). Antibody titers were expressed as the logarithm of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay titers that gave an optical density (OD) higher than the mean plus five times the standard deviation (SD) of the average OD obtained in the preimmune sera. The titers were normalized with respect to the reference serum assayed in parallel. Preimmunization values consistently gave OD values below 0.1. Serum bactericidal antibodies titers were determined as previously described (12, 14), with baby rabbit as the source of complement. Titers were expressed as the lowest serum dilution resulting in at least 50% killing of bacteria. Student's t test (two tails) was used to compare antibody titers between groups and at different times. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
To evaluate the strength of the helper effect of N19 compared to CRM197, groups of mice were immunized with decreasing amounts of each conjugate. The conjugate containing N19 was more immunogenic than the one with CRM (Fig. 1). After two immunizations, the N19-based constructs induced serum anti-MenC IgG antibodies at titers significantly higher than those induced by three doses of the CRM-MenC conjugate (e.g., post-2 N19-MenC at 0.625 µg versus post-3 CRM-MenC at 0.625 µg [P < 0.01]; post-2 N19-MenC at 0.156 µg versus post-3 CRM-MenC at 0.156 µg [P < 0.05]). After three doses, lower amounts of N19-based conjugate induced levels of anti-MenC IgG antibodies significantly higher than those induced by the CRM-MenC conjugate (e.g., N19-MenC at 0.156 µg versus CRM-MenC at 0.625 µg [P < 0.01]).
![]() View larger version (18K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Serum anti-MenC IgG antibody responses. Groups of six BALB/c mice were immunized three times with decreasing amounts of N19-MenC or CRM-MenC (2.5, 0.625, 0.156, and 0.039 µg of MenC/dose) and 0.5 mg of aluminium hydroxide. Serum samples were collected before (pre) and after (post-1, -2, and -3) each immunization and tested individually to quantitate MenC-specific IgG antibody titers. Each point represents the mean antibody titer (± 1 SD) of each group at each time point.
|
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Anti-carrier IgG antibody responses in single serum samples of mice immunized as described before. Since mice were immunized with equal amounts of MenC in either conjugate, the final amount of carrier protein is slightly different in the groups receiving the CRM-MenC and those that received the N19-MenC, due to the slight difference in the sugar-to-protein ratios in the two constructs. Serum samples were collected before (pre) and after (post-1, -2, and -3) each immunization and tested individually to quantitate carrier-specific IgG antibody titers. Each point represents the mean antibody titer (± 1 SD) of each group at each time point.
|
![]() View larger version (18K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Bactericidal activity in serum samples of mice immunized three times with decreasing amounts of N19-MenC or CRM-MenC (2.5, 0.625, 0.156, and 0.039 µg of MenC/dose) and 0.5 mg of aluminium hydroxide. Bactericidal antibody titers from pooled serum samples collected before (pre) and after (post-1, -2, and -3) each immunization are shown. Results are expressed as reciprocal values of the highest serum dilution giving at least 50% bacterial killing.
|
Compared to most of the carrier proteins currently in use, including the CRM, the N19 polypeptide induces a very poor antibody response against itself. This would have been expected based on the fact that N19 is made of a series of sequences representing CD4 T-cell epitopes. The low titers of antibodies detected may be directed against particular sequences and/or structures created during the assembly of the protein and not necessarily present in the native proteins. Despite the fact that N19 contains 10 copies of 5 epitopes from TT, anti-N19 antibodies were unable to recognize TT in solid phase. It is very likely that N19-based conjugates will not induce epitope-specific suppression, although this is a phenomenon observed mainly in mice but is still controversial in humans.
Work is currently in progress to evaluate the carrier effect of this protein with other bacterial capsular polysaccharides and to dissect the mechanisms behind the strong and efficient carrier effect of the N19 polyepitope.
We thank Silvia Mancianti for superb technical assistance and Marco Tortoli for technical help with mice.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»