Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, September 2004, p. 5502-5505, Vol. 72, No. 9
0019-9567/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/IAI.72.9.5502-5505.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
and Tonie E. Rocke2*
Wildlife Science Group, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington,1 U.S. Geological Survey, National Wildlife Health Center, Madison, Wisconsin,2 Heska Corporation, Ft. Collins, Colorado3
Received 4 December 2003/ Returned for modification 13 January 2004/ Accepted 28 May 2004
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Plague epizootics in prairie dog populations with mortality rates as high as 95 to 99% have been well documented for many decades (1, 5, 6, 18, 21). Not only do these outbreaks decimate local populations of prairie dogs, they also impact other species that depend on prairie dogs for food and shelter (2), such as the endangered black-footed ferret (Mustela nigripes). Although flea infestations in prairie dogs have been reduced in the past by application of insecticides to burrows (10), this method is labor intensive and generally applied after an outbreak has begun. Prophylactic control of the disease through immunization could be more effective. Recently, Osorio et al. (16) described a recombinant raccoon poxvirus (RCN) that expresses the F1 antigen of Y. pestis (herein designated RCN-F1) and protects mice from virulent plague challenge. In preliminary experiments with black-tailed prairie dogs (Cynomys ludovicianus), all animals vaccinated with RCN-F1 via intramuscular (i.m.) injection survived subcutaneous challenge with virulent Y. pestis (T. E. Rocke, unpublished data). However, efficient large-scale protection of free-ranging wildlife populations necessitates voluntary consumption of vaccine (19, 20). The purpose of this study was to investigate the ability of RCN-F1 to elicit a protective immune response against Y. pestis infection in black-tailed prairie dogs after voluntary ingestion of palatable vaccine-laden baits.
Experimental animals. Adult black-tailed prairie dogs captured from wild colonies in South Dakota were purchased from a commercial supplier and transported to the U.S. Geological Survey National Wildlife Health Center (Madison, Wis.). Upon arrival at the National Wildlife Health Center, animals were inspected for external parasites, treated with an anthelminthic injection (Ivomec; Merck & Co., Inc, West Point, Pa.), and marked with uniquely numbered ear tags. Prairie dogs were group housed in isolation rooms with approximately 180 square ft of floor space. Beta chips covered the floor, and Rubbermaid nest boxes connected by lengths of polyvinyl chloride pipe were used to mimic a burrow system. An alfalfa-based pelleted food was fed free choice (approximately 50 g per animal per day), and fresh vegetables (broccoli, carrot, green beans, and sweet potato chunks) were given once daily. Water was available ad libitum.
Vaccine and bait preparation. The raccoon poxvirus-vectored recombinant plague vaccine RCN-IRES-tPA-YpF1 (designated RCN-F1 in this paper) was produced as previously described (16) and stored at 70°C in 2-ml aliquots until bait production. Virus stocks were thawed and diluted to 5 x 107 50% tissue culture infective doses (TCID50)/ml in Hanks' medium (Gibco BRL, Carlsbad, Calif.) supplemented with 5% glycerin (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.) immediately before use.
Observation of the prairie dogs' food preference suggested that sweet potato was the most palatable vegetable in their laboratory diet. Finely shredded sweet potato was lightly packed in 10-g lots into wells of plastic ice cube trays, and 8 ml of liquid gelatin (9.3 g of powdered gelatin [Difco, Irvine, Calif.] in 150 ml of warmed Hanks' medium) was added, followed by 1 x 107 TCID50 of RCN-F1 vaccine/ml in 200 µl of Hanks' medium with glycerin. The vaccine was gently mixed through the liquid gelatin and sweet potato. For the negative control baits, 200 µl of Hanks' medium with glycerin alone was inserted into the bait. The ice cube trays were then refrigerated for 30 to 90 min until the gelatin baits were solidified.
To ensure that bait production did not reduce vaccine vector viability, virus was extracted from two vaccine-laden baits within 24 h after preparation by homogenization and low-speed centrifugation. Identical processing was performed on two negative control baits containing no RCN-F1. Extracted supernatants were serially diluted (10x), Vero cells were added and, after 3 days at 37°C and 5% CO2, wells were stained with trypan blue and observed for disruption of the Vero cell monolayer, consistent with viral cytopathic effect (CPE). The supernatant from the vaccine-bait preparation had a titer of 1 x 106 TCID50/ml as compared to 2 x 106 TCID50/ml for the positive control sample. The difference between these two titers was probably due to incomplete extraction of virus from the bait. Even if formulation led to some reduction in viral titer, we estimate that oral consumption of one bait exposed a prairie dog to at least 2 x 106 TCID50 of the RCN-F1 vaccine/ml.
Vaccine administration. Eighteen prairie dogs were randomly assigned to each of two isolation rooms to serve as negative control and oral vaccinate groups. Four additional animals were assigned to a third room and received the vaccine via i.m. inoculation (1 x 107 TCID50 of RCN-F1/ml in the right thigh on day 0 and day 23) to confirm vaccine infectivity. The groups were not matched for sex or size, although all were adults.
Animals were prepared for vaccination by withholding fresh vegetables for 48 h and pelleted food for 12 to18 h. Animals were then individually identified by ear tag and placed in pet carriers with a small food dish containing a single vaccine-laden or vaccine-free (placebo) bait, depending on the experimental group. After 2 to 4 h, all animals were released and bait consumption was recorded for each individual. This process was performed on days 0 and 1 ("priming vaccinations") and on days 26 and 27 for negative controls and days 23 and 24 for vaccinees ("booster vaccinations"). Most of the animals ate both priming and boosting baits (Table 1). One animal in each of the vaccinated and negative control groups failed to consume at least one priming bait but then ate at least one boosting bait. One animal in the negative control group failed to eat any baits and was eliminated from further analyses.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Numbers of RCN-F1 vaccine-laden baits consumed by black-tailed prairie dogs (C. ludovicianus) in relation to survival against Y. pestis challenge, days to death, and antibody titers to RCN and Y. pestis F1 and V antigens
|
Survival rates of orally vaccinated prairie dogs differed significantly (P < 0.01) from those of negative controls via the Fisher exact test (22). Ten of the 18 (55.6%) vaccinees survived challenge (Table 1) compared to only 2 of 17 (11.8%) controls that ingested one placebo bait. In contrast, time to death for those animals that did not survive challenge was not significantly different (P > 0.2) between the vaccinated and control groups via the Mann-Whitney ranks test (22). Although not included in our analyses, two of four animals vaccinated via the i.m. route also survived challenge.
Plague-induced mortality in challenged animals was verified by isolation of Y. pestis-specific DNA sequences from tissue culture by PCR. Selected frozen carcasses were thawed and necropsied, and tissue samples from lung, liver, and spleen were cultured in brain heart infusion broth (Difco) and on blood agar plates (Becton-Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, N.J.) at 28°C for up to 72 h. The DNA was subsequently extracted from the culture broth and stored at 20°C. For PCR, primers specific for the Y. pestis F1 gene (12) were used to amplify DNA fragments that were fractionated and directly visualized using standard techniques. Y. pestis DNA fragments were recovered by PCR from the lungs of 10 of 12 necropsied animals that had succumbed to plague challenge and from the liver or spleen of 4 of the 12. Y. pestis DNA was not recovered from any sampled tissue of the three necropsied animals that survived challenge.
Anti-RCN antibody. Blood samples (300 µl) were collected from the medial saphenous vein of each prairie dog before the priming and booster vaccinations and before challenge; blood samples were also obtained from survivors postchallenge. Serum was collected and stored at 20°C until analyses.
A modification of a low antibody titer microneutralization assay was used to determine serum anti-RCN antibody titers. Prairie dog serum samples were serially diluted and tested for the ability to neutralize 1 x 103 PFU/ml in microtiter plates. After incubation for 2 h at 37°C, incubated samples were added to duplicate wells of previously seeded 96-well plates containing Vero cells. After additional incubation, fixation, and staining, CPE was scored in relation to negative control wells and the highest dilution of serum with reduced infection (25 to 50% reduction in CPE) was recorded.
Of 17 vaccinees tested, all developed anti-RCN antibody titers of 1:15 or higher (maximum, 1:1,875) postboost (Table 1); the serum from one individual was not tested because it was hemolytic. The geometric mean titer (GMT) of the oral vaccinees was 1:176, while all the negative controls had anti-RCN antibody titers of <1:15. All four animals immunized with RCN-F1 by i.m. injection developed anti-RCN antibodies, confirming infectivity of the virus; their GMT was 1:839.
Anti-F1 antibody titers. Antibody titers to Y. pestis F1 antigen were determined by using a modified enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay ELISA protocol (4) with F1 antigen supplied by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Briefly, serum samples were serially diluted fourfold from 1:50 to 1:12,800; test samples were run in duplicate. Each plate also contained four replicates of a negative control serum sample and two replicates of a positive control serum sample. A horseradish peroxidase-labeled anti-prairie dog immunoglobulin G custom prepared by Bethyl Laboratories (Montgomery, Tex.) was diluted 1:100 and used as the secondary antibody. Titers <1:50 were treated as equal to 1:50, and those >1:12,800 were treated as equal to 1:12,800.
Baseline antibody titers against F1 antigen were all <1:50. Fourteen of the 18 vaccinees developed anti-F1 antibody titers of
1:100 after vaccination (Table 1). The postprime GMT of oral vaccinees was 1:177, and their postboost GMT was 1:416. Reciprocal titers were log10 transformed, and the difference in each animal's transformed titer from baseline to postprime and from postprime to postboost was calculated. Anti-F1 antibody titers increased significantly in vaccinated animals after both the initial dose (P < 0.01, Wilcoxon signed rank test) and the second booster dose (P < 0.01; Fig. 1). These data demonstrate that voluntary ingestion of RCN-F1-laden baits by prairie dogs elicited a humoral immune response to F1 protein.
![]() View larger version (30K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Geometric mean anti-F1 antibody titers in black-tailed prairie dogs (C. ludovicianus) that consumed RCN-F1 vaccine-laden baits (vaccinees) or placebo baits (negative controls). Columns labeled with different letters indicate a significant difference from 0 in median change in titer between bleeds (Wilcoxon signed ranks test; P < 0.05).
|
Survival in relationship to antibody titers.
Logistic regression (14) plotting the probability of surviving challenge against transformed postbooster anti-F1 antibody titer resulted in an odds ratio of 23 (95% confidence interval, 1.39 to 377.5), indicating a weak but significant relationship (P < 0.05) between anti-F1 antibody titer and survival. All eight vaccinees with prechallenge anti-F1 titers
1:800 survived challenge with Y. pestis, whereas most animals (vaccinees and controls) with titers
400 (23 of 27) died upon challenge. There was no significant relationship between anti-RCN antibody titer and survival of prairie dogs (P > 0.05). Antibody titers to F1 and V antigens, but not necessarily both, increased postchallenge in all but one survivor of Y. pestis challenge (Table 1).
We were surprised that two unvaccinated animals survived challenge with 130,000 CFU and believe that this suggests that innate resistance to Y. pestis may occur in some prairie dogs. The nature of this resistance is unknown. Interestingly, the two control animals that survived challenge developed high antibody titers to V antigen (2,560 and 10,240) but not to F1 (<50 and 100).
Conclusions. This is the first report of protection against plague in prairie dogs elicited through voluntary consumption of a vaccine-laden bait. Prairie dogs that ingested at least one RCN-F1 vaccine-laden bait were more likely to survive challenge (56%) with Y. pestis than control animals that consumed placebo baits (12%). In our laboratory trial, we used sweet potato gelatin baits because they were easy to produce and suited our requirements. More stable, weather-resistant baits will need to be developed for future field trials. Like vaccinia virus and other orthopoxviruses, RCN infects mucosal tissue and, thus, it is ideally suited for use as an oral viral vector. Also, RCN is highly attenuated and shown to be safe in numerous animal species, including black-footed ferrets (Rocke, unpublished), raccoons, skunks, bobcats, cats, dogs, and sheep (7, 8, 9, 13). Following immunization of mice and cats with RCN-vectored vaccines in other studies, RCN infection was limited to the site of exposure and no viremia or viral shedding was detected (15).
Oral vaccination through consumption of vaccine-laden baits may have application in managing plague epizootics in free-ranging prairie dog populations. Immunization of natural prairie dog colonies via oral, vaccine-laden baits could directly reduce plague mortality in exposed individuals and could also reduce the source of bacteria for flea transmission.
Funding for this project was provided by the USGS-Biological Resources Division, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, the Turner Foundation, and the National Wildlife Federation.
Present address: Inviragen, Mt. Horeb, WI 53572. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»