Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, January 2005, p. 277-286, Vol. 73, No. 1
0019-9567/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/IAI.73.1.277-286.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Children's Hospital Oakland Research Institute, Oakland, California
Received 26 July 2004/ Returned for modification 2 September 2004/ Accepted 24 September 2004
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Pneumococcal capsular polysaccharides are classified as T-cell-independent type 2 (TI-2) antigens, which are characterized by high molecular weight, multiple repeat epitopes, persistence in vivo, a failure to stimulate major histocompatibility complex type II-mediated T-cell help, and poor immunogenicity in children under 18 months of age (12, 33). The currently licensed 23-valent pneumococcal capsular polysaccharide vaccine is effective in the majority of adults but is poorly immunogenic in children under 2 years of age and in patients with immunodeficiencies (59). To overcome this lack of efficacy, T-cell-dependent (TD) protein carriers have been coupled to capsular polysaccharides and incorporated into newer pneumococcal vaccines (28). Use of a recently licensed heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine has resulted in a significant decline in the rate of invasive pneumococcal infections in children in the United States and a significant but more modest decline in disease rates in adults (56).
The capsular polysaccharide of serotype 14 S. pneumoniae (PPS14) is included in the currently licensed conjugate vaccine and all others currently under development, as it is one of the three most prevalent serotypes causing invasive pneumococcal disease worldwide (47). PPS14 activates the alternative pathway of complement (19), and its ability to induce a primary antibody response in BALB/c mice is complement dependent (30). However, the role of complement activation in the antibody response to PPS14 conjugated to a TD protein carrier has not been examined. We have used ovalbumin (OVA) as a model TD protein carrier because the murine immune response to OVA has been well characterized and because its low molecular mass (43 kDa) facilitates the preparation of PPS14-OVA conjugates that are free of unconjugated carrier protein. Our previous studies comparing PPS14-OVA and PPS14-C3d conjugates have shown that PPS14-OVA is a potent immunogen in BALB/c mice (51).
For the studies described here, we wished to inhibit activation of endogenous complement independently at the time of either primary or secondary immunization. Because this is difficult or impossible using C3 or complement receptor knockout mice, we treated mice with cobra venom factor (CVF) to deplete serum complement prior to immunization. CVF is a functional analogue of C3b, but it is not susceptible to degradation and inactivation by factors H and I (55). Hence, injection of mice with CVF results in unregulated complement activation and temporary depletion of serum C3. Our results show that complement depletion at the time of primary immunization of mice with PPS14 or PPS14-OVA results in a suboptimal primary anti-PPS14 antibody response but enhances the secondary (memory) antibody response. When complement is depleted at the time of secondary immunization, less-pronounced effects on the subsequent anti-PPS14 antibody response are observed and consist primarily of decreased anti-PPS14 immunoglobulin G (IgG) concentrations.
|
|
|---|
) and 9.2 (IgM,
) were provided by Alexander H. Lucas (Children's Hospital Oakland Research Institute). Baby rabbit serum (as a source of complement) was purchased from CedarLane Laboratories (Hornby, Ontario, Canada). PPS14 conjugated to OVA was prepared as described previously (51) by using CDAP. Conjugates were isolated by chromatography on a 1- by 50-cm column of Bio-Gel P-300 (Bio-Rad Laboratories). PPS14-OVA preparations were dialyzed into phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and 0.2-µm filtered before storage at 4°C. The PPS14 concentration of conjugate preparations was determined by a resorcinol sulfuric acid micromethod (35), and the protein concentration was determined with the bicinchoninic acid protein assay (Pierce).
Mice and immunizations. Female BALB/c mice were obtained from Charles River Laboratories (Hollister, Calif.) and were used at 10 to 11 weeks of age. Female BALB/c mice splenectomized or sham-splenectomized at the age of 4 weeks were also purchased from Charles River Laboratories and were rested for 6 weeks prior to immunization. Animal protocols were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Mice were immunized with 1 µg of PPS14 as unmodified PPS14 or PPS14-OVA diluted in 200 µl of sterile, endotoxin-free PBS (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.). In some experiments, mice were immunized with 0.2 or 0.5 µg of PPS14-OVA. Antigen was administered by subcutaneous injection, with the total dose divided equally between two sites. A second identical injection was given 42 days after the first. Blood samples were obtained 3 days before and at 10, 25, and 39 days after primary immunization and at days 10 and 25 after secondary immunization.
Mice that received CVF were given three intraperitoneal injections of 5 µg of CVF diluted in 200 µl of sterile, endotoxin-free PBS at 28, 24, and 4 h prior to immunization as previously described (30). This treatment regimen completely depleted serum alternative pathway hemolytic activity at the time of immunization as determined using rabbit erythrocytes as alternative pathway activators. Groups of 8 to 10 mice were immunized with or without pretreatment with CVF at the time of primary immunization or at the time of secondary immunization. In experiments to determine the effects of altering the time of CVF treatment relative to the time of immunization with PPS14-OVA, different groups of mice were treated with CVF such that the last dose of CVF was given on the day of immunization, at 2 and 4 days before immunization, and at 2 and 4 days after immunization.
ELISAs for determination of anti-PPS14 antibody concentrations. Serum anti-PPS14 antibodies were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) specific for anti-PPS14 IgM and anti-PPS14 IgG. Purified 9.2 IgM and 44.2 IgG anti-PPS14 monoclonal antibodies were used as standards in the assays. Wells of microtiter plates (Nunc MaxiSorp ImmunoPlate; Nalge Nunc International Corp., Rochester, N.Y.) were coated overnight with 100 µl of rabbit antiserum against PPS14 (Statens Serum Institut) diluted 1/1,000 in PBS containing 0.02% sodium azide. The coating antibody was aspirated, and wells were incubated with 200 µl of PBS containing 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and 0.1% sodium azide (PBS-BSA-Az) for 1 h at room temperature. Plates were washed with PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20 (Bio-Rad), and 100 µl of a saturating concentration (10 µg/ml) of purified PPS14 in PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20 was added to each well. Plates were incubated overnight at 4°C and then washed. Fifty microliters of PBS-BSA-Az containing 20 µg of C-PS (PBS-BSA-Az plus C-PS)/ml was added to wells, and 50 µl of PBS-BSA-Az plus C-PS containing 20 µg of PPS14/ml was added to a duplicate set of wells. Fifty microliters of serum sample diluted in PBS-BSA-Az plus C-PS (three or four dilutions of each sample) or standard was added to each set of wells, and plates were incubated for 2 h at 37°C. The plates were washed and incubated for 90 min at 37°C with biotinylated rabbit anti-mouse IgM or IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc., West Grove, Pa.) followed by washing and incubation for 60 min at 37°C with streptavidin-alkaline phosphatase conjugate (Caltag Laboratories, Burlingame, Calif.). After a final wash, plates were developed with Sigma 104 phosphatase substrate, and the absorbance at 405 nm was determined on a SpectraMax 340 microplate reader (Molecular Devices Corp., Sunnyvale, Calif.). Antibody concentrations were calculated after subtracting the absorbance reading for wells containing 20 µg of PPS14/ml from those containing diluted sample alone. The minimal detectable concentration was 0.19 ng/ml for the IgM anti-PPS14 ELISA and 0.25 ng/ml for the IgG anti-PPS14 ELISA.
ELISA for determination of anti-OVA IgG antibody concentrations. Serum anti-OVA IgG concentrations were determined by ELISA using methods identical to those used to measure IgG antibodies against PPS14, except that plates were coated with 100 µl of OVA (Pierce)/well at 2 µg/ml and purified monoclonal anti-OVA IgG (Sigma) was used as a standard.
Isotype analysis. The IgG and IgA subclass compositions of serum antibodies to PPS14 were determined by ELISA with the SBA clonotyping system/AP and murine IgG subclass standards (Southern Biotechnology Associates, Birmingham, Ala.). Serum samples were diluted in PBS containing 1% BSA, 0.1% sodium azide, and 20 µg of pneumococcal cell wall polysaccharide/ml (dilution buffer) such that the anti-PPS14 IgG concentration was identical in each sample. A control for each serum sample consisted of diluted serum (or standard) plus an equal volume of PPS14 (20 µg/ml) in dilution buffer. The value for this control was subtracted from the corresponding value for diluted serum incubated with an equal volume of dilution buffer. PPS14-specific IgA, IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b, and IgG3 were determined using alkaline phosphatase goat anti-mouse conjugates specific for each subclass. Results are expressed as the absorbance at 405 nm at 2 h for each serum sample.
IgG purification. IgG was purified from five 25-day post-secondary immunization serum samples each from untreated and CVF-treated mice immunized with PPS14-OVA. Serum IgG was purified by affinity chromatography on 1-ml HiTrap protein G columns (Amersham Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden). Following elution from the protein G column, fractions containing IgG were pooled and concentrated on a Centricon filtration device with a YM10 membrane (Millipore, Bedford, Mass.). The concentrated IgG was dialyzed into PBS, and sufficient 5% BSA was added to give a final concentration of 0.5% BSA.
To remove serum anti-C-PS antibody, Dynabeads M-280 streptavidin (Dynal Biotech, Oslo, Norway) were incubated with biotinylated C-PS to generate C-PS-coated magnetic beads. Fifty microliters of Dynabeads M-280 streptavidin was coated with biotinylated C-PS and washed with PBS plus 0.5% BSA. The IgG preparation was immediately added to the C-PS beads and incubated with gentle mixing for 2 h at 4°C, and the supernatant was collected. To eliminate any residual IgM, the resulting IgG preparation was incubated as above with Dynabeads M-450 coated with rat anti-mouse IgM (Dynal). After this purification procedure, anti-PPS14 IgG recovery averaged 90.1% and anti-PPS14 IgM averaged 0.2% of total Ig. IgG3 anti-PPS14 was lost during the purification procedure, so the final IgG preparation consisted almost solely of IgG1 anti-PPS14.
Anti-PPS14 IgG avidity assays.
Avidity was measured according to previously published methods (37) which have been used to measure avidity of antibodies to both pneumococcal (8) and nonpneumococcal (36) polysaccharides. Polystyrene 96-well plates (Nunc) were coated overnight at 4°C with 1 µg of PPS14/ml. The plates were blocked with PBS-BSA-Az, followed by washing with 0.1% Tween 20 in PBS. Purified IgG samples were diluted in PBS-BSA-Az plus C-PS to a final anti-PPS14 IgG concentration of 50 ng/ml. Equal volumes of purified IgG and buffer or PPS14 at 10 different concentrations, ranging from 0.2 to 20,000 ng/ml in PBS plus 0.02% azide, were mixed in 12- by 75-mm tubes, and then 100 µl of the mixture was added to wells, incubated at 37°C for 2 h, and washed with PBS plus 0.1% Tween 20. The remainder of the assay was performed as described for the anti-PPS14 IgG ELISA. An avidity constant (
K) was calculated as the inverse molar concentration of soluble PPS14 required to inhibit antibody binding to solid-phase PPS14 by 50%, assuming a molecular mass of 1,000,000 Da for PPS14.
In addition, we measured direct binding of anti-PPS14 IgG to wells coated with seven different concentrations of PPS14 ranging from 1 to 1,000 ng/ml. The PPS14 coating concentration at which anti-PPS14 IgG binding was 50% of maximum was calculated for each IgG preparation.
Opsonophagocytic killing assay. Killing of opsonized serotype 14 pneumococci by RAW 264.7 murine macrophages was assayed according to previously published methods (46) modified as needed for analysis of mouse anti-PPS14 IgG. In the wells of 96-well microplates, 10 µl (1,000 CFU) of serotype 14 pneumococci in the third log phase was mixed with 20 µl of purified IgG from mouse serum and sufficient Hanks balanced salt solution plus calcium and magnesium (HBSS2+) plus 0.1% gelatin to achieve a total volume of 50 µl. Final IgG concentrations (after addition of phagocytes) ranged from 0.2 to 2,000 ng/ml. The microplate was placed in 5% CO2 at 37°C for 15 min. Five microliters of baby rabbit serum as a source of complement was added, followed immediately by 50 µl of RAW 264.7 cells (45) at 8 x 106/ml. Control wells contained bacteria, complement, and RAW 264.7 cells but no IgG. The microplate was placed on an orbital rotator at 200 rpm and incubated at 37°C for 45 min. Twenty-five microliters was removed from each well and added to 300 µl of HBSS2+, and 162.5 µl was plated on blood agar plates (trypticase soy agar with 5% sheep blood; Becton Dickinson and Co., Sparks, Md.) in duplicate. The plates were cultured overnight at 37°C in 5% CO2, and bacterial colonies were counted the following morning. Based on the average number of CFU, killing was calculated according to the following formula: percent killing = 100 x (1 [CFU of test IgG]/[CFU of the complement + RAW 264.7 control]).
Statistical analysis.
Serum anti-PPS14 IgM and IgG concentrations were determined for individual mice within each immunization group, and the geometric mean and 95% confidence intervals of the geometric mean were calculated. To eliminate the effects of mouse-to-mouse variability, statistical comparisons were made on log-transformed data. Comparisons between mice vaccinated without pretreatment and those receiving CVF were done using Student's t test for unpaired samples. Statistical significance was set at a P level of
0.05.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Enhancement of the anti-PPS14 antibody response by conjugation of OVA to PPS14. BALB/c mice (10 mice per group) were immunized subcutaneously with 1 µg of PPS14 as either unmodified PPS14 or PPS14-OVA. A second injection identical to the first was given 42 days later. Serum anti-PPS14 IgM (left) and IgG (right) GMC are shown for serum samples obtained 3 days before and 10 and 25 days after each injection. Error bars represent the 95% confidence interval. Arrows indicate the day of secondary immunization. P values for mice immunized with PPS14-OVA versus mice immunized with PPS14 were highly significant (P 108) for all postimmunization bleeds for both IgM and IgG anti-PPS14.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Effect of CVF on the anti-PPS14 antibody response to PPS14 and PPS14-OVAa
|
0.8 µg/ml in both control and CVF-treated mice. The low anti-OVA response probably was a consequence of the low dose of OVA (
1.5 µg) in each injection of PPS14-OVA conjugate and the absence of adjuvant in our vaccine preparations. Effect of complement depletion on the anti-PPS14 antibody response after immunization with lower doses of PPS14-OVA. We performed a number of additional experiments to further characterize the effect of CVF treatment at the time of primary immunization on the anti-PPS14 antibody response to PPS14-OVA. To determine if the effects of CVF treatment on the secondary anti-PPS14 antibody response would be maintained at lower doses of conjugate, we examined the effects of CVF administered at the time of primary immunization in mice immunized with two injections of 0.2, 0.5, or 1.0 µg of PPS14-OVA (Fig. 2). Similar to its effects after immunization with 1.0 µg of conjugate, CVF caused decreases in anti-PPS14 IgM and IgG 10 days after primary immunization with either 0.2 or 0.5 µg of PPS14-OVA and marked increases in anti-PPS14 Ig at 10 days after secondary immunization, which were highly significant for anti-PPS14 IgG (Fig. 2). The effect of CVF was especially pronounced after immunization with 0.2 µg of PPS14-OVA, where the serum anti-PPS14 IgG GMC for mice treated with CVF (1,042.59 µg/ml) was over 10 times the value for mice immunized with conjugate alone (92.77 µg/ml).
![]() View larger version (17K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Effect of CVF treatment on the anti-PPS14 antibody response in mice immunized with different doses of PPS14-OVA. Groups of eight BALB/c mice were immunized subcutaneously with 0.2, 0.5, or 1.0 µg of PPS14 as PPS14-OVA. A second immunization at the same dose was given 42 days after the first. Bars represent the serum anti-PPS14 IgM and IgG GMC values at 10 days post-primary (left) and 10 days post-secondary (right) immunization for untreated mice (Untx) or mice receiving CVF at the time of primary immunization. At 10 days after secondary immunization, anti-PPS14 IgM was significantly increased in CVF-treated mice compared with untreated mice for animals immunized with 0.2 µg of PPS14-OVA (P = 0.01), and anti-PPS14 IgG was significantly increased for mice immunized with 0.2 µg (P = 0.0007), 0.5 µg (P = 0.006), or 1.0 µg (P = 0.02) of PPS14-OVA.
|
3% of pretreatment C3 levels within 6 to 8 h after the last injection (31), remain low until about day 4 (31, 40), and then return to pretreatment levels over another 2 to 4 days (31, 40). To determine the effects of altering the time of CVF treatment relative to the time of immunization, mice were treated with CVF at the time of immunization, at 2 and 4 days before immunization, and at 2 and 4 days after immunization (Fig. 3). At 10 days after primary immunization, GMC anti-PPS14 IgM and IgG values were significantly decreased compared to untreated controls for mice treated with CVF 2 days before (P = 0.003 for IgM anti-PPS14; P = 0.0003 for IgG anti-PPS14) and at the time of immunization (P = 0.002 for IgM anti-PPS14; P = 0.00004 for IgG anti-PPS14), but not for mice treated with CVF 4 days before or 2 or 4 days after immunization. At 10 days after secondary immunization, anti-PPS14 IgM concentrations were significantly increased for mice treated with CVF 2 days before (P = 0.02) or at the time of primary immunization (P = 0.03), but not at the other times. Anti-PPS14 IgG concentrations were significantly increased only for mice receiving CVF at the time of primary immunization (P = 0.04), although modest increases in anti-PPS14 IgG were observed in mice receiving CVF 2 days before or after immunization. Thus, it appears that complement must be depleted during the first 2 to 4 days after primary immunization with PPS14-OVA to see an effect on the anti-PPS14 memory response.
![]() View larger version (17K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Effect of treatment with CVF at different times relative to immunization on the anti-PPS14 antibody response in mice immunized with PPS14-OVA. Groups of eight BALB/c mice were immunized subcutaneously with 1 µg of PPS14 as PPS14-OVA. A second immunization at the same dose was given 42 days after the first. CVF (5 µg) was administered by intraperitoneal injection 28, 24, and 4 h prior to primary immunization. The values shown below the x axis indicate the day of the last CVF injection relative to the day of immunization. Bars represent serum anti-PPS14 IgM and IgG GMC values at 10 days post-primary (left) and 10 days post-secondary (right) immunization for untreated mice (Untx) or mice receiving CVF at the time of primary immunization.
|
4.6% of the IgG1 anti-PPS14 concentration in serum samples from untreated mice to 16.3% of anti-PPS14 IgG1 in mice treated with CVF.
![]() View larger version (13K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Effect of CVF treatment on the isotype profile of anti-PPS14 Ig from mice immunized with PPS14-OVA. Serum samples collected at 25 days after secondary immunization from the mice described in the legend to Table 1 were analyzed by ELISA for anti-PPS14 IgG subclass and IgA distribution. Results are expressed as the mean (± standard error) A405 at 2 h for 10 serum samples in each immunization group. Where the A405 for a given isotype was significantly altered in mice receiving CVF, the P value is shown above the relevant bar.
|
K) was calculated as the inverse molar concentration of soluble PPS14 required to inhibit IgG binding by 50%. Wells were coated with 1 µg of PPS14/ml. The results of this analysis are shown in Fig. 5A. The mean
K value for untreated mice immunized with PPS14-OVA was 1.53 x 1011 (standard error [SE], 8.38 x 1010), which was six times the value (2.54 x 1010 ± 1.08 x 1010) for mice that received CVF at the time of primary immunization. Because of overlap in values for individual mice, the differences were not statistically significant. In the second avidity assay (Fig. 5B), we measured direct binding of anti-PPS14 IgG to wells coated with seven different concentrations of PPS14 ranging from 1 to 1,000 ng/ml. The PPS14 coating concentration at which anti-PPS14 IgG binding was 50% of maximal values was 3.75 ± 0.48 ng/ml for untreated mice and 6.32 ng/ml for mice treated with CVF (P = 0.002). However, the magnitude of the difference was very small and may not be biologically important. Nonetheless, these results suggest that complement depletion induces subtle differences in avidity of IgG anti-PPS14 antibodies, with CVF treatment causing a decrease in avidity to soluble PPS14 (Fig. 5A) and only a small decrease in avidity to solid-phase PPS14 (Fig. 5B).
![]() View larger version (11K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Functional attributes of anti-PPS14 IgG purified from serum samples collected at 25 days after secondary immunization. For each immunization group, IgG was purified from five of the 25-day postsecondary serum samples used for the isotype analysis described in the legend for Fig. 3. Avidity was determined in a competition binding ELISA (A) and by direct binding to PPS14-coated wells of 96-well plates (B). In panel A, avidity is expressed as an avidity constant ( K), the inverse molar concentration of soluble PPS14 which inhibited binding of anti-PPS14 IgG to solid-phase PPS14 by 50%. In panel B, avidity is expressed as the coating concentration of PPS14 at which anti-PPS14 IgG binding was 50% of maximal values. In panels A and B, symbols represent values for individual IgG preparations and horizontal bars indicate the means. (C) Opsonophagocytic killing of serotype 14 S. pneumoniae by mouse RAW 264.7 macrophages was determined by counting surviving colonies grown on blood agar plates after incubation of bacteria, different concentrations of anti-PPS14 IgG, baby rabbit serum as a complement source, and RAW 264.7 cells. Recovery of bacteria in control wells was 135 ± 4 CFU (expected = 125 CFU). Results shown are the mean percentage of serotype 14 S. pneumoniae bacteria killed at each concentration of anti-PPS14 IgG. Killing in the absence of complement was assessed at an anti-PPS14 IgG concentration of 20 ng/ml and was 3.5% ± 1.6% (n = 10).
|
In summary, depletion of serum complement at the time of primary immunization with PPS14-OVA resulted in increased concentrations of anti-PPS14 antibodies after secondary immunization and increased IgG3 anti-PPS14, but the IgG1 anti-PPS14 antibodies still constituted the majority of anti-PPS14 IgG and were equally capable of supporting opsonophagocytic killing of serotype 14 S. pneumoniae as were their counterparts in mice not depleted of complement. These results suggest that somatic hypermutation and affinity maturation occurring in germinal centers after immunization with PPS14-OVA were similar in complement-depleted and untreated mice.
Effect of splenectomy on the anti-PPS14 antibody response to PPS14 and PPS14-OVA. To determine whether conjugation of OVA affected the ability of splenectomized mice to respond to PPS14, we performed immunizations in mice that had been splenectomized 6 weeks prior to immunization (Table 2, experiment 1). Sham-splenectomized mice underwent an identical surgical procedure, except the spleen was not removed. At 10 days post-primary immunization, there were significant decreases in both IgM and IgG anti-PPS14 in splenectomized mice immunized with either PPS14 or PPS14-OVA. At 10 days after secondary immunization, the magnitude of the differences in the anti-PPS14 response between splenectomized and control mice had narrowed for both vaccine groups and was no longer significantly different for anti-PPS14 IgM in mice immunized with PPS14-OVA and for anti-PPS14 IgG in mice immunized with either PPS14 or PPS14-OVA. Thus, the primary anti-PPS14 antibody response is critically dependent on the presence of a spleen, but the anti-PPS14 memory response after immunization with PPS14-OVA is nearly normal even in the absence of a spleen.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Effect of splenectomy without or with CVF treatment on the anti-PPS14 antibody response to PPS14 and PPS14-OVA
|
Together with the results shown in Tables 1 and 2 (experiment 1), these data suggest the possibility that the memory response to PPS14-OVA develops in a lymphoid compartment distinct from the spleen even when the spleen is present. Thus, complement depletion has a similar effect on the memory response in the presence or absence of the spleen. Still, it remains possible that the memory response normally develops in the spleen, but that responsibility for PPS14-specific memory cell development can be assumed by other secondary lymphoid tissues in the absence of a spleen.
|
|
|---|
Mice immunized with lower doses (0.2 and 0.5 µg) of PPS14-OVA had significantly enhanced anti-PPS14 antibody concentrations after secondary immunization, with the most significant increases in anti-PPS14 IgG occurring at the lowest dose of PPS14-OVA. The adjuvant effect of C3d conjugation on the humoral immune response to TD antigens is also most apparent at low doses of immunogen (11), suggesting that the effects of complement activation on different aspects of the adaptive immune response will be most easily detected when using lower immunizing doses of antigen.
IgG subclass switching and affinity maturation both occur within germinal centers (27, 49); thus, the differences we observed in IgG subclass distribution and avidity of IgG anti-PPS14 antibodies in mice treated with CVF likely reflect subtle changes in the germinal center reaction. IgG1 anti-PPS14 predominated after immunization with PPS14-OVA regardless of CVF treatment, but we did observe over a threefold increase in IgG3 anti-PPS14 after CVF treatment. Increases in IgG3 antipolysaccharide antibodies have also been reported in mice immunized with PPS conjugate vaccines and CpG oligodeoxynucleotides (9) or meningococcal group C polysaccharide conjugate vaccines and interleukin-12 (4), suggesting that CVF treatment could affect the cytokine milieu within germinal centers. The magnitude of differences in IgG avidity in mice treated with CVF versus untreated mice was small, and this was reflected in the lack of difference in opsonophagocytic function of IgG1 antibodies from the two groups of mice. Overall, the functional attributes of anti-PPS14 IgG antibodies were largely unaffected by CVF treatment.
Experiments in which CVF was administered at different times relative to the time of immunization revealed that complement must be depleted during the first 2 to 4 days after primary immunization with PPS14-OVA to have an effect on the secondary anti-PPS14 antibody response. These findings are similar to those observed by Gray and coworkers, who found that treating mice with soluble CD40-
1 within 4 days of immunization impaired the memory response to DNP-OVA but that treatment initiated later than 4 days after immunization was without effect (18). Indeed, the different effects of CVF treatment on the primary and memory responses to PPS14-OVA are remarkably similar to the effects of treatment of mice with stimulatory antibodies to CD27 or CD40 on the antibody response to TI-2 or TD antigens (42, 43). Ligation of CD27 or CD40 results in reduced expression of the transcription factor Blimp-1 (18, 43, 44), which plays a key role in inducing terminal differentiation of B cells into plasma cells (5). This suggests the possibility that complement-mediated effects could be occurring indirectly by affecting signaling via CD27 or CD40. Alternatively, complement could influence the plasma cell versus memory cell decision by independent mechanisms. Since it has been proposed that the strength of B-cell signaling may affect the memory cell versus plasma cell decision (5), it is relevant that coligation of CR2 and antigen receptors on B cells can lower both the concentration and affinity thresholds for B-cell activation (6, 34) and increase the level of B-cell activation for a given dose of antigen (6, 11, 53). Thus, complement activation at the time of immunization might help balance the B-cell fate decision in favor of plasma cells. Alternatively, complement activation might influence the differentiation of a specific memory B-cell precursor population (26) distinct from the cells responsible for generation of the primary antibody response.
The importance of the complement system in the memory response to TI-2 antigens has been subjected to minimal study to date. CVF given at the time of primary immunization decreased the secondary antibody response to high doses of particulate (39) or soluble (24) TD antigens, but the effects of CVF on the secondary response to low antigen doses or TI-2 antigens was not examined in either of those studies. Treatment with a monoclonal antibody that blocks ligand binding to both mouse CR1 and CR2 had no effect on the secondary antibody response to the TI-2 antigen Ficoll when given at the time of secondary immunization, but the effect of antibody given at the time of primary immunization was not examined (52). Mice treated with either a monoclonal antibody specific for CR1 only or one specific for both CR1 and CR2 had a diminished primary response to the TI-2 antigen dextran, but the secondary response was not measured (57). A decrease in the secondary response to both particulate and soluble T-cell-dependent antigens after treatment with the CR1/CR2-specific monoclonal antibody was shown to occur independent of any effect on T-cell priming (20), but whether this effect extends to T-cell help involved in the immune response to TI-2 antigens remains to be seen. Studies using a soluble form of CR2 to block interactions between C3d(g) and CR2 have shown an inhibitory effect on the primary response to TD antigens in vivo (22), but analyses of its effects on the secondary response have only been performed in vitro (41). Finally, a number of studies have demonstrated a decreased secondary antibody response to TD, but not TI-2, antigens in mice lacking C3 (15, 16), C4 (15), or CR1 and CR2 (1, 10, 13, 29, 32). C3-deficient dogs had an impaired secondary antibody response to the TI-2 antigen DNP-Ficoll when immunized intravenously (38). The same study showed an enhanced secondary response to the TD antigen SRBC given intramuscularly but not intravenously, a result showing that the effects of complement on the humoral immune response may vary depending on the route of immunization. It should be noted that interactions of C3 fragments with their receptors would be permanently blocked in knockout mice or C3-deficient dogs, but only temporarily inhibited (e.g., at the time of primary immunization) in studies such as ours making use of CVF.
We previously showed that conjugation of C3d to PPS14 enhanced both the primary and secondary anti-PPS14 antibody responses relative to those induced by immunization with unmodified PPS14 and induced switching from IgM to IgG anti-PPS14 (51). The results of that study appear to conflict with those of the experiments reported here, where we found that complement depletion also resulted in an enhanced secondary anti-PPS14 antibody response. However, mice in our original report were immunized with PPS14-C3d at the time of both primary and secondary immunization, whereas mice demonstrating an increased secondary antibody response in this study were depleted of complement only at the time of primary immunization, leaving complement activation at the time of secondary immunization unaffected. These results are consistent with complement activation having dual effects on the humoral immune response to PPS14 or PPS14-OVA, enhancing both the immediate production of antibody via effects on interactions between the CD19/CD21/CD81 complex and B-cell receptor (14, 50), while at the same time having negative effects on the generation of memory B cells.
Our results also confirm reports that immunization with PPS conjugate vaccines can induce a strong antibody response in the absence of a spleen (3, 54). The means by which conjugation of TD carriers to PPS bypasses the requirement for the spleen in the anti-PPS antibody response is currently unknown, but likely involves enhancement of the anti-PPS14 immune response in extrasplenic locations. The effects of complement depletion were similar in normal and splenectomized mice immunized with PPS14-OVA but not unmodified PPS14, also suggesting the possibility that conjugation of a TD carrier to PPS14 influences the anatomic sites of memory B-cell development. However, the experiments reported here do not allow us to exclude the possibility that the immune response to PPS14-OVA ordinarily occurs primarily in the spleen and that conjugation of OVA simply enables other lymphoid tissues to mount an anti-PPS14 antibody response when the spleen is absent.
Our results may have practical implications with respect to the use of manipulations of complement to modulate the immune response to vaccines, particularly those making use of TI-2 antigens such as bacterial polysaccharides. Our results suggest that complement inhibition at the time of primary immunization could enhance the secondary (or subsequent) antibody response to vaccines consisting of either unmodified polysaccharide or polysaccharide conjugated to a protein carrier. Complement inhibition could be especially advantageous when used with conjugate vaccines, by allowing dosage reduction and extending vaccine supplies. Pneumococcal conjugate vaccines, which must contain conjugates of several different capsular polysaccharide serotypes, are more difficult to manufacture than monovalent vaccines. Shortages of the first licensed 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine have already been reported and in some cases have led to alterations in immunization schedules in both public and private immunization programs (17). More recently, elimination of the third and fourth doses of the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in the initial immunization series have been recommended to maintain diminishing supplies of vaccine (7). Complement inhibition at the time of primary immunization might be an effective means of reducing overall vaccine dosage requirements by either permitting reduction in the amount of vaccine used in an individual injection or by decreasing the number of injections required to achieve protective antibody concentrations. Because the immune response differs among TI-2 antigens and between TI-2 and TD antigens (33), it is difficult to generalize our results to all immunogens. Thus, the clinical utility of complement inhibition as a means to enhance the immune response to vaccines will require extensive further study.
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant AI-49250.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»