Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, November 2005, p. 7252-7258, Vol. 73, No. 11
0019-9567/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/IAI.73.11.7252-7258.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands,1 School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom2
Received 5 April 2005/ Returned for modification 9 June 2005/ Accepted 4 August 2005
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The nickel-responsive regulatory protein NikR is a member of the ribbon-helix-helix (RHH) family of DNA binding proteins (12). The NikR protein consists of two different domains: an N-terminal DNA-binding domain homologous to the Arc/CopG/MetJ/Mnt family of RHH regulators and a C-terminal domain that is required for binding of nickel and for tetramerization (8, 11-14, 35, 46). NikR was first identified in Escherichia coli, where it functions as a transcriptional repressor of the Nik nickel uptake system (20). NikR mediates its repressor function via nickel-dependent binding to a palindromic sequence in the promoter region of the nik operon (12, 14). The net result of this regulation is expression of the Nik system only when nickel is scarce in the cell (20).
NikR orthologs have been identified in other gram-negative bacteria, including H. pylori (15, 42). In H. pylori, NikR mediates nickel- and acid-responsive gene regulation (10, 15, 40-42) and is predicted to affect different pathways involved in metal metabolism (15, 39). NikR has been suggested to function as the main nickel-responsive regulatory system in H. pylori, since absence of NikR results both in reduced growth at higher environmental nickel concentrations and in the absence of nickel- and acid-responsive induction of urease expression (10, 15, 40, 42). However, these functions of NikR have been demonstrated mostly by using H. pylori mutant strains (10, 15, 40, 42), while evidence of direct regulation by NikR was not presented.
Here it is demonstrated that H. pylori NikR binds directly to specific sequences in the nixA and ureA promoters in a nickel-dependent fashion. This nickel-dependent binding of NikR to the nixA and ureA promoters results in repression and induction of transcription, respectively. The sequences recognized by H. pylori NikR are significantly different from the consensus sequence proposed for recognition by E. coli NikR. Based on these results, we hypothesize that the location of the operator sequence in the promoter region determines whether NikR represses or induces transcription in H. pylori.
|
|
|---|
0.2 µM of Ni2+ (6). NiCl2 (Sigma) was used to supplement BBN medium to final concentrations of 20 and 200 µM. E. coli strains were grown aerobically at 37°C in Luria-Bertani medium (34). When appropriate, BBN and Luria-Bertani media were supplemented with ampicillin, kanamycin, or chloramphenicol to a final concentration of 100 µg/ml, 20 µg/ml, or 10 µg/ml, respectively. Urease assay. The enzymatic activity of urease was determined in fresh H. pylori lysates by measuring ammonia production from hydrolysis of urea by using the Berthelot reaction as described previously (41). The concentration of ammonia in the samples was inferred from a standard NH4Cl concentration curve. Enzyme activity was expressed as micromoles of substrate hydrolyzed per minute per milligram of protein. Protein concentrations were determined by the bicinchoninic acid method (Pierce) using bovine serum albumin as a standard.
Cloning, expression, and purification of H. pylori NikR. The nikR gene was amplified from H. pylori 26695 by using primers NIKRSK7-L1 and NIKRSK7-R1 (Table 1). The resulting fragment was digested with BsaI and ligated into BsaI-digested pASK-IBA7 (IBA, Gottingen, Germany) to create pASK-IBA7-NikR. The wild-type sequence of the nikR gene was confirmed by DNA sequencing. H. pylori NikR was expressed with an N-terminal Strep tag, which does not influence the DNA-binding activity of the H. pylori Fur protein (23, 43, 45) and therefore was not removed prior to use. The recombinant protein was purified as described in the manufacturer's instructions and designated Strep-NikR. The recombinant protein was more than 90% pure as determined by staining with Coomassie brilliant blue following electrophoresis on 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels (14). Purified protein was used directly for electrophoretic mobility shift and DNase I footprinting assays.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Oligonucleotide primers used in this study
|
Purification and analysis of RNA. Total RNA was isolated from H. pylori 26695 and its isogenic nikR mutant using Trizol (Gibco Life Technologies) (41). Gel electrophoresis of RNA, transfer to positively charged nylon membranes (Roche), cross-linking, hybridization to digoxigenin (DIG)-labeled specific RNA probes, and detection of bound probe were performed as described previously (22, 41). Probes specific for nixA and ureI were synthesized by in vitro transcription using T7 RNA polymerase (Roche) and PCR products obtained with primers NixA-F1/NixA-R1-T7 and UreI-F2/UreI-R2-T7 (Table 1).
Electrophoretic mobility shift assays. The ureA-DFP-F and ureA-DFP-R-Dig primers (Table 1) were used to amplify a 430-bp fragment from plasmid pBJD3.3 (17), which contains the wild-type ureA promoter region from H. pylori strain 1061 (designated PureA). These primers were also used to amplify a 390-bp fragment from plasmid pBJD3.9 (17, 42), where the region encompassing nucleotides 50 to 90 is deleted from the ureA promoter (17, 42) (designated PureA-del). The 514-bp nixA promoter region fragment (designated PnixA) was amplified with primers NixA-DFP-F and NixA-DFP-R-Dig (Table 1). An internal fragment of the H. pylori amiE gene was amplified with primers Int-amiE-F1 and Int-amiE-R1-Dig (Table 1) and was used as a negative control. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays were performed using 18, 20, and 16 pM of PureA-wt, PureA-del, and PnixA promoter fragments, as well as with 43 pM of the negative control. DNA fragments were mixed with Strep-NikR protein to final concentrations of 0, 15, 30, 150, and 300 nM in binding buffer (consisting of 20 mM Tris [pH 7.6], 100 mM KCl, 3 mM MgCl2, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, 5% glycerol, and 100 µM of NiCl2) and incubated for 30 min at 37°C. Subsequently, samples were loaded onto nickel-containing 7% acrylamide gels (34). Gels were blotted onto a nylon membrane (Roche), followed by chemiluminescent DIG detection (41).
DNase I footprinting. DNase I footprinting was performed using 360, 400, and 320 pM of the PureA, PureA-del, and PnixA fragment, respectively. DNA fragments were incubated without or with 2.86 µM of Strep-NikR protein in the presence or absence of 100 µM NiCl2 in binding buffer (10 mM HEPES [pH 7.6], 100 mM KCl, 3 mM MgCl2, and 1.5 mM CaCl2) for 30 min at 37°C. Subsequently the DNA was digested with 0.25 U DNase I (Promega) for 1 min, and the reaction was stopped as described previously (19). Fragments were separated on a 7% acrylamide-8 M urea sequencing gel (Bio-Rad) (34). Gels were blotted onto a positively charged nylon membrane (Roche), followed by chemiluminescent DIG detection (41).
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (18K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Mutation of nixA complements nickel sensitivity of an H. pylori nikR mutant but does not restore nickel-dependent induction of urease activity. (A) Growth of wild-type H. pylori 26695 (black bars), the nikR mutant (white bars), and the nikR nixA double mutant (gray bars) in BBN medium supplemented with 0, 20, or 200 µM NiCl2. Results are averages for three independent growth experiments after measurement of the OD600 24 h after inoculation. (B) Urease activity measurements of wild-type H. pylori 26695 (black bars), the nikR mutant (white bars), and the nikR nixA double mutant (gray bars) grown in BBN medium supplemented with 0, 20, or 200 µM NiCl2. Results are averages of three independent urease activity measurements. Error bar indicate standard deviations. Asterisks indicates a significant difference between the growth (A) or urease activity (B) of a mutant and that of the wild-type strain (P < 0.05 by the Mann-Whitney U test).
|
Transcription of the nixA and ureA genes is regulated by NikR. Northern hybridization with probes specific for the nixA and ureI genes was used to assess whether transcription of nixA and the urease operon is regulated by nickel and NikR. RNA was isolated from cultures grown in BBN medium supplemented with 0, 20, or 200 µM NiCl2 (Fig. 1). The nixA probe hybridized to a transcript of approximately 1 kb in RNA isolated from wild-type H. pylori grown in unsupplemented medium but was not detected in RNA isolated from wild-type H. pylori grown in medium supplemented with 20 and 200 µM NiCl2 (Fig. 2, center). In contrast, in the nikR mutant, transcription of the nixA gene was constitutively high and independent of NiCl2 supplementation (Fig. 2, center). The size of the nixA mRNA is consistent with monocistronic transcription of nixA.
![]() View larger version (76K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Transcription of nixA is nickel and NikR repressed, whereas transcription of ureA is nickel and NikR induced, in H. pylori. Northern hybridization was performed on RNA from wild-type H. pylori 26695 and nikR mutant cells grown in BBN medium supplemented with 0, 20, or 200 µM NiCl2. Staining of transferred RNA by methylene blue is included for comparison of RNA amounts (top panel). The positions of the predicted nixA, ureABIE', and ureIE' transcripts (1, 41) are indicated on the right, whereas the probes used and relevant marker sizes are given on the left.
|
NikR mediates repression of nixA transcription by nickel-dependent binding to the nixA promoter. A 514-bp fragment containing the nixA promoter region was amplified by PCR and incubated with Strep-NikR in the presence or absence of nickel (Fig. 3A). In the absence of nickel, addition of Strep-NikR protein did not result in an electrophoretic mobility shift (Fig. 3A). When nickel was present in the binding buffer, addition of the Strep-NikR protein resulted in an electrophoretic mobility shift (Fig. 3A). An internal fragment of the H. pylori amiE gene was used as a negative control and did not display any shift in the presence of nickel and Strep-NikR (Fig. 3A).
![]() View larger version (43K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. NikR represses nixA transcription by nickel-dependent binding to a specific operator in the H. pylori nixA promoter region. (A) Electrophoretic mobility shift assays with recombinant H. pylori Strep-NikR protein and the nixA promoter (PnixA) in the presence (+Ni) and absence (Ni) of NiCl2. An internal fragment of the amiE gene was used as a negative control only in the presence of NiCl2. The Strep-NikR-complexed nixA fragment is indicated as Strep-NikR-PnixA. Strep-NikR concentrations used are given above the lanes; DNA concentrations were 16 pM (PnixA) and 43 pM (negative control). (B) Identification of the NikR operator sequence in the nixA promoter by DNase I footprinting in the absence () and presence (+) of Strep-NikR protein, in the presence of nickel. The protected region is delineated by a black bar on the right, while the positions of the GTG start codon, the +1 transcriptional start site, and the 10 promoter region are indicated on the left. (C) Schematic representation of the nixA promoter region with the location and sequence of the NikR-binding site indicated, whereby 13 and +21 indicate the boundaries of the NikR-binding site. The nixA transcriptional start site (16) is underlined in the binding sequence.
|
NikR induces urease transcription by binding to an upstream operator sequence of ureA. A 430-bp fragment was amplified containing the wild-type H. pylori ureA promoter region (PureA). In the presence of nickel, addition of Strep-NikR to PureA resulted in an electrophoretic mobility shift, which was missing in the absence of nickel (Fig. 4A). Using a DNase I footprinting assay, it was demonstrated that in the presence of nickel, Strep-NikR protein consistently blocked DNase I degradation of a single binding sequence (CAAAGATATAACACTAATTCATTTTAAATAATAATT) located from 56 to 91 relative to the transcription start site (17) (Fig. 4B and C). The region bound by Strep-NikR was not protected against DNase I degradation in the absence of nickel or in the absence of NikR (Fig. 4B, left), consistent with the electrophoretic mobility shift assays (Fig. 4A).
![]() View larger version (60K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. NikR induces ureA transcription by nickel-dependent binding to a specific operator in the H. pylori ureA promoter region. (A) Electrophoretic mobility shift assays with recombinant H. pylori Strep-NikR protein and the ureA promoter (PureA) and a 90/50 deletion mutant (PureA-del) in the presence (+Ni) and absence (Ni) of NiCl2. An internal fragment of the amiE gene was used as a negative control only in the presence of NiCl2. The Strep-NikR-complexed ureA fragment is indicated as Strep-NikR-PureA. Strep-NikR concentrations used are given above the lanes; DNA concentrations were 20 pM (PureA), 22 pM (PureA-del), and 43 pM (negative control). (B) DNase I footprinting assays with the PureA promoter fragment (left panel) and the PureA-del promoter fragment (right panel) in the absence () and presence (+) of Strep-NikR protein and in the absence or presence of nickel. The protected region is delineated by a black bar on the right of the PureA panel. Convergent arrows indicate the position of the palindrome from 49 to 67 in the ureA promoter, while 50/90 indicates the position of the deletion in the PureA-del promoter fragment. The location of the 35 promoter sequence is also indicated. (C) Schematic representation of the ureA promoter region with the location and sequence of the NikR-binding site indicated, whereby 91 and 56 indicate the boundaries of the NikR-binding site. The two arrows represent the putative inverted repeat at positions 67 to 49.
|
|
|
|---|
Nickel-responsive regulation by NikR had been studied in depth only for E. coli, where NikR regulates the expression of the Nik nickel transporter system (14, 20). Once the intracellular concentration of nickel exceeds a certain threshold (13), E. coli NikR binds to a palindromic sequence (GTATGA-N16-TCATAC) that overlaps with the 10 region of the nikA promoter. This is thought to effectively block access of RNA polymerase to the promoter and results in cessation of transcription (14, 20). This process allows the cell to maintain control of the intracellular nickel concentration. Similar forms of metal-responsive regulation have been described for other metals, such as the control of iron metabolism by Fur (2).
The H. pylori NikR binding sequences in the nixA and ureA promoters were identified using DNase I footprinting. The NikR binding sequence in the nixA promoter consists of a 36-bp sequence, which is located at positions 13 to +21 relative to the transcriptional start site. This region in the nixA promoter effectively overlaps with the 10 and +1 sequence, and this may prevent transcription upon binding of NikR. In contrast, the NikR-binding site in the ureA promoter is located upstream of the canonical
80 promoter motifs (17, 36, 42), at positions 56 to 91, and partially overlaps with the putative palindrome previously suggested as a possible binding sequence for NikR (42). Deletion of the region upstream of residue 50 in the ureA promoter was previously shown not to affect basal levels of urease expression (17) but prevented nickel-responsive induction of urease expression (42), and this is consistent with the position of the NikR-binding site in the ureA promoter as identified in this study. The deletion of the region from 50 to 90 indeed abolished binding of NikR (Fig. 4B), indicating the importance of this region in NikR binding and nickel-responsive regulation of urease transcription (17, 42). We hypothesize that binding of NikR to the ureA binding site allows RNA polymerase easier access to the ureA promoter, by a mechanism currently unknown.
The two binding sequences recognized by H. pylori NikR do not resemble the E. coli NikR binding sequence (GTATGA-N16-TCATAC) (14) and thus exemplify the clear differences between the E. coli and H. pylori NikR systems. A single homolog of the E. coli sequence is present in the H. pylori genome, in the promoter of the nikR gene itself. Although binding of recombinant NikR to its own promoter was reported, this binding did not result in nickel-responsive regulation of the nikR gene (15). Taken together, these data suggest that the sequences recognized by H. pylori NikR differ significantly from the E. coli NikR consensus sequence. Alignments of the NikR-binding sites in the nixA and ureA promoters revealed that they have only relatively limited homology to each other (19/36 residues [Fig. 5A ]). It is therefore not yet possible to define a consensus sequence for the H. pylori NikR-binding site.
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Analysis and model of nickel-responsive gene regulation by H. pylori NikR. (A) Comparison of the H. pylori NikR-binding sites in the nixA and ureA promoters. The H. pylori NikR-binding sites in the nixA and ureA promoters were aligned using the Clone Manager 7 suite (Scientific and Educational Software, Cary, NC). Asterisks indicate identical residues. (B) Schematic overviews of NikR-mediated transcriptional regulation of nixA and ureA transcription in H. pylori. Binding of the NikR-nickel complex to sequences upstream of the canonical promoter (as in the ureA promoter) results in induction of transcription, whereas binding of the NikR-nickel complex to the canonical promoter results in repression of transcription (as in the nixA promoter).
|
Comparison of the positions of the NikR-binding sites in the nixA and ureA promoters with the regulatory responses observed suggests that the position of the binding site determines whether transcription of a NikR-controlled gene is nickel repressed or nickel induced (Fig. 5B). When the binding site overlaps with the promoter motifs, transcription is repressed, whereas binding of NikR upstream of the promoter motifs results in induction of transcription. A similar type of regulation was described recently for the ferric uptake regulator protein Fur in Neisseria meningitidis, where transcription of the tbp2 gene is iron and Fur repressed by binding of Fur to a sequence overlapping the 10 and +1 sequence, and transcription of three other genes is induced in an iron-dependent manner by binding of Fur to sequences upstream of the promoter region (18). A similar type of regulation has also been reported for Mycobacterium tuberculosis IdeR (26, 33).
In conclusion, the NikR protein of H. pylori functions as a repressor or an activator of nickel-responsive transcription, depending on the position of its binding site. Binding is dependent on nickel, and this mechanism allows H. pylori NikR to control both the uptake and the usage of nickel, depending on intracellular nickel availability. Compared to the E. coli NikR system, which is currently known to regulate only nickel uptake, H. pylori NikR is a versatile regulatory protein that can control important aspects of nickel metabolism and virulence.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»