Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, February 2005, p. 883-893, Vol. 73, No. 2
0019-9567/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/IAI.73.2.883-893.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Pharmacology, Graduate School of Dental Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
Received 18 August 2004/ Returned for modification 14 September 2004/ Accepted 5 October 2004
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
) (7, 10, 31), complement factors C3 and C5 (47), and immunoglobulins (1, 20); disruption of the bactericidal activity of polymorphonuclear leukocytes (1, 20, 26); and strong induction of human fibroblast (3, 4) and human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) (5) death. In addition, gingipains are also shown to be important for the bacterium to proliferate and survive in the periodontal pockets (26, 34, 39). The pathophysiological importance of gingipains has been further substantiated by newly developed gingipain inhibitors (22).
Gingipains are produced as secreted or membrane-associated forms on the cell surface (37, 41). The cell-associated gingipains comprise the majority (
80%) of Rgp and Kgp activities (unpublished data) and are thus believed to be responsible for the virulence of the bacterium. Accordingly, the characterization and subsequent control of the cell-associated gingipain complex are thought to be the most promising therapeutic approaches for periodontitis and related systemic disorders including atherosclerosis and premature birth. Recently, Bhogal et al. (8) demonstrated a
300-kDa cell-associated gingipain complex composed of both catalytic domains (PrtR45 and PrtK48) and seven C-terminal hemagglutinin/adhesin domains (PrtR44, PrtR15, PrtR17, PrtR27, PrtK39, PrtK15, and PrtK44) encoded by two genes, prtR (rgpA) and prtK (kgp), in the cell sonicate of P. gingivalis. Whereas the structures of the gingipain complexes were well defined in the previous study, the functional significances of the complexes are incompletely understood.
Lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a component of the outer membrane of gram-negative bacteria, is a potent virulence factor causing toxic shock in the host (25). It has previously been shown that several proteins in P. gingivalis, including RgpB, RgpAA4 (Hgp27), and uncharacterized proteins P59 and P27, are modified with LPS (45). LPS is known to stimulate host cells mainly via the Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)/MD-2 pathway. However, previous studies have demonstrated that unlike enterobacterial LPS, P. gingivalis LPS uses TLR2 to induce innate immune responses in both human and mouse macrophages (15, 23). It has also previously been reported that P. gingivalis LPS is able to suppress the biological activity of TLR4 agonists (11, 48). Furthermore, the production of cytokines induced by P. gingivalis LPS has been shown to be negligible when compared with that of Escherichia coli LPS (15).
In the present study, we obtained a large cell-associated gingipain complex by detergent extraction. The purified gingipain complex was found to be modified by LPS. Nevertheless, LPS in the complex was barely able to stimulate human and mouse macrophages. Thus, the critical features of the gingipain complex, including high cytotoxicity, marked degradation of matrix proteins, and evasion of the host immune response, which are closely related to the virulence of the bacterium, were demonstrated.
|
|
|---|
Bacteria and culture conditions. P. gingivalis ATCC 33277 was used as a wild-type strain. The Rgp-deficient (rgpA rgpB-deficient) mutant and the Kgp-deficient (kgp-deficient) mutant were described previously (26, 35, 39). The wild-type strain and these mutants were grown under anaerobic conditions (10% CO2, 10% H2, 80% N2) in enriched brain heart infusion broth at 37°C. Erythromycin (10 µg/ml) and tetracycline (1 µg/ml) were added to the medium if necessary.
Determinations. Proteolytic activities of Rgp and Kgp were determined with benzyloxycarbonyl (Z)-Phe-Arg-4-methyl-7-coumarylamide (MCA) and Z-His-Glu-Lys-MCA as the respective substrates, as described previously (2, 20). One unit of each enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required for the release of 1 nmol of 7-amino-4-methylcoumarin/ml per min under the conditions used.
The collagenolytic activity assay was performed as previously described (6), with some modifications. Samples were added to a 96-well plate which was precoated with 500 µg of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled type I collagen/ml and incubated for 6 h at 37°C. The inhibitor cocktail containing leupeptin (10 mM), EDTA (10 mM), and tosyl-L-phenylalanine chloromethyl ketone (1 mM) was then added to terminate the reaction, and the solubilized gelatin fragments were measured by using a Wallac 1420 ARVOsx (excitation and emission maxima at 490 and 535 nm, respectively; PerkinElmer). Collagenase from Clostridium histolyticum (type I; Sigma) was used as a positive control.
Elastolytic activity was assessed by an elastin-fluorescein (200/400 mesh) degradation assay as previously described (30), with some modifications. The samples were incubated with 10 µl of elastin-fluorescein (5 mg/ml) in 10 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.5, containing 0.5 mM CaCl2, 0.2 mg of bovine serum albumin/ml, 5 mM cysteine, and 0.025% sucrose monolaurate at 37°C for 2 h with rapid shaking. Ten microliters of 0.2 M EDTA and 10 mM tosyl-L-phenylalanine chloromethyl ketone was then added to the reaction mixtures and centrifuged at 8,000 x g rpm for 10 min. The fluorescence intensity in the supernatant was measured at an excitation wavelength of 490 nm and an emission wavelength of 535 nm.
Quantities of cytokines and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) were measured as follows. The cells were exposed to the freshly prepared or heat-denatured cell-associated gingipain complex (4 ng/well) in the medium at 37°C for 24 h. At the end of the incubation period, the supernatants were collected and analyzed. IL-6 and TNF-
were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with specific reagent for each cytokine (BIOSOURCE, Camarillo, Calif.) according to the manufacturer's instructions. NO2, the end product of NO, was quantified using an NO2/NO3 Assay Kit-F II (DOJINDO).
Purification of the cell-associated gingipain complexes. The purification steps are shown in Table 1. P. gingivalis cells were harvested by centrifugation at 10,000 x g for 20 min at 4°C and washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). All steps were carried out at 4°C unless stated otherwise. The washed cells were resuspended in 0.5% sucrose monolaurate-PBS and allowed to stand for 3 h. After centrifugation at 105,000 x g for 30 min, the supernatant was filtered (0.22 µm) prior to gel filtration fast-performance liquid chromatography. The filtrate was applied to a column (1.8 by 70 cm) containing Sephacryl S-300 (Amersham Biosciences) that had been equilibrated with 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer containing 0.15 M NaCl and 0.5% sucrose monolaurate. The column was washed at a flow rate of 0.3 ml/min. The active enzyme fractions for Rgp and Kgp were pooled and concentrated. The enzyme solution containing both activities was passed through a column (2 by 6 cm) containing DEAE-Sepharose (Amersham Biosciences) equilibrated with the same buffer. After washing the column with the buffer, the adsorbed proteins were eluted by a stepwise gradient of NaCl (0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, and 0.5 M) in the buffer. The active enzyme fractions eluted at 0.2 M NaCl, which contained both Rgp and Kgp activities, were collected and concentrated by ultrafiltration (Centriprep YM30; Amicon). The enzyme solution was applied to a gel filtration column (2.6 by 60 cm) containing Superdex 200 (Amersham Pharmacia) equilibrated with 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer containing 0.15 M NaCl and 0.5% sucrose monolaurate. The column was washed at a flow rate of 1.1 ml/min. The active enzyme fractions were pooled and concentrated.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Purification of the gingipain complexes from P. gingivalisa
|
Antibodies. His6-tagged recombinant proteins of the proteinase domain, Hgp44, Hgp15, Hgp17, and Hgp27 of RgpA were overexpressed in E. coli BL21 carrying expression plasmids. The expression plasmids were constructed as follows: DNA for each domain of RgpA was amplified by PCR with various primers using P. gingivalis ATCC 33277 chromosomal DNA as a template (Fig. 1). The nucleotide sequences of the primers were as follows: 5'-ATCCATATGAAAAACTTGAACAAGTTTGTTTCG-3' and 5'-AATGGATCCCGAAGAAGTTCGGGGGCATCGCTG-3' for the proteinase domain of RgpA, 5'-GAATTCAGCGGTCAGGCCGAGATTGTTC-3' and 5'-AAGCTTGCGCTTGCCGTTGGCCTTGATC-3' for Hgp44, 5'-GAATTCGCAGACTTCACGGAAACGTTCG-3' and 5'-AAGCTTTTTGGCGCCATTGGCTTCCGT-3' for Hgp15, 5'-GAATTCCCTCAAAGTGTATGGATCGAGC-3' and 5'-AAGCTTACGTACATCGTTTGCAGGTTCG-3' for Hgp17, and 5'-GAATTCGCCAACGAAGCCAAGGTTGTGC-3' and 5'-AAGCTTCTTTACAGCGAGTTTCTCTACG-3' for Hgp27. The PCR products shown by arrows in Fig. 1 were inserted into the pGemT vector (Promega) and confirmed the sequences. The plasmids carrying hgp44, hgp15, hgp17, and hgp27 genes were digested with EcoRI and HindIII, and the plasmid of the proteinase domain gene was digested with NdeI and BamHI. The resulting DNA fragments were inserted into plasmid pET28a digested with the same restriction enzymes. His-tagged recombinant proteins were purified by using a HiTrap Chelating Sepharose column (5 ml; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) loaded Ni2+ ions. Polyclonal antibodies to these recombinant proteins and the synthetic peptide NH2-DVYTDHGDLYNTPVRMC-COOH corresponding to the N-terminal 16-amino-acid sequence of the proteinase domain of Kgp were raised in rabbits. The immunoglobulin G fraction from each of these antisera was prepared by ammonium sulfate fractionation followed by protein A-Sepharose affinity chromatography.
![]() View larger version (14K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Schematic representation of preparation of recombinant proteins of the proteinase and adhesin domains of RgpA. The DNA for each domain of RgpA was amplified by PCR with primers (arrows) using P. gingivalis ATCC 33277 chromosomal DNA as a template. The PCR products were inserted into plasmid pET28a. The numbers in the RgpA structure indicate the predicted amino acid residues assigned based on its nucleotide sequence.
|
Culture conditions of HUVEC, Gin-1, and THP-1. HUVEC were grown in MCDB 151 medium (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.) supplemented with 0.1% NaHCO3, 15% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 10 ng of recombinant acid fibroblast growth factor/ml, 10 µg of heparin/ml, and 60 µg of kanamycin/ml in humidified 5% CO2 at 37°C. Gin-1 was grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% FBS, 1% penicillin-streptomycin, and 1% L-glutamine in humidified 5% CO2 at 37°C. THP-1 cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium (GIBCO, Auckland, New Zealand) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS and 100 U of penicillin/ml and 100 µg of streptomycin/ml at 37°C and 5% CO2. THP-1 cells were then differentiated for 72 h in the presence of 10 ng of phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate/ml, washed three times, and rested overnight.
Assessment of cell viability. HUVEC monolayers and Gin-1 cultured overnight in each medium containing 15 and 10% FBS in 96-well microtiter plates were changed with each medium in the absence of FBS with or without the purified complex or the monomeric form of either Rgp or Kgp and then incubated up to 7 and 24 h, respectively. A total of 2.7 units of Rgp and 2.4 units of Kgp, based on units required for the release of synthetic substrate described above, were used for each cell. Viability of the cells was measured with Cell Counting Kit 8 (DOJINDO) as described previously (3-5).
Preparations of peritoneal macrophages. Peritoneal cells were collected from inbred 8- to 12-week-old mice (C57BL/6 and LPS-nonresponsive C3H/HeJ) that had been intraperitoneally injected with 2 ml of 4% thioglycolate before 4 days by lavage of the peritoneal cavity with 10-ml portions of saline. The cell suspension was dispensed into plastic petri dishes. After incubation at 37°C for 1 h, the nonadherent cells were removed, and the remaining macrophage monolayers were rinsed three times with saline before fresh RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS, 50 U of penicillin/ml, and 50 µg of streptomycin/ml was added. The macrophages were cultivated overnight at 37°C to give a uniform monolayer of well-spread cells composed of more than 95% macrophages.
Electron microscopy. The purified membrane-associated enzyme complex absorbed to glow-discharged carbon-coated grids was washed twice with distilled water, blotted with filter paper, and then negatively stained with 0.5% uranyl formate for 30 to 60 s. The sample was analyzed with a JEM 2000EX electron microscope (JEOL Co., Ltd., Akishima, Japan) at 100 kV.
Two-dimensional electrophoresis. IPG strips, pH 4 to 7 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), were rehydrated with gingipain complex for 12 h at room temperature. Isoelectric focusing was performed with a Multiphor II (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) for a total of 8 kVh at 20°C. Strips were equilibrated for 15 min in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.8, 6 M urea, 30% glycerol, 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), and 64 mM dithiothreitol and were then equilibrated for 15 min in the same buffer containing 135 mM iodoacetamide instead of dithiothreitol. Equilibrated IPG strips were transferred onto 10% polyacrylamide gels. SDS gels were electroblotted onto nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes were incubated with various primary antibodies (anti-Rgp, -Kgp, -Hgp44, or -Hgp27 or lipid A antibody) and visualized.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (33K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Solubilization of cell-associated gingipain complexes with various detergents. P. gingivalis bacterial cells were incubated with 20 mM phosphate buffer containing various detergents at 4°C for 3 h. After incubation, the solubilized materials were collected by centrifugation at 100,000 x g for 30 min. The Rgp (open column) and Kgp (closed column) activities in the supernatant fraction were determined. The values are expressed as the percentages of the maximum activities obtained with 0.5% sucrose monolaurate. CHAPS, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate; CHAPSO, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-2-hydroxy-1-propanesulfonate; BIGCHAP, N,N-bis(3-D-gluconamidopropyl)cholamide.
|
![]() View larger version (81K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Nondenatured polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (A) and SDS-PAGE (B) followed by immunoblot analyses, and electron micrograph (C) of the final preparation of the cell-associated gingipain complex. (A) The final preparation of the cell-associated complex (27.5 µg) was examined by nondenatured PAGE containing 0.5% sucrose monolaurate, and the gel was then stained with SYPRO Red. For immunoblot analysis, the proteins separated by nondenatured PAGE were transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane and immunostained with polyclonal antibodies that recognize the catalytic domains of both Rgp and Kgp. (B) The purified complex (3.5 µg) was boiled in an SDS-solubilizing buffer and separated by SDS-PAGE. Proteins were visualized with SYPRO Red staining (left panel). The proteins separated in the gel were transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes followed by immunostaining with polyclonal antibodies that recognize the catalytic domains of both Kgp and Rgp or various adhesin domains of RgpA. Numbers indicate molecular masses of the corresponding protein bands. (C) The purified complex was negatively stained with 0.5% uranyl formate and observed by electron micrography (magnification, x280,000). The bar corresponds to 25 nm. Panels 1 to 3 were magnified images (magnification, x4,480,000).
|
Intense degradation of collagen and elastin by the complex. The gingipain complex contains C-terminal adhesin domains as well as Rgp and Kgp catalytic domains. Since the adhesin domain has been implicated as the "hemagglutination" and "hemoglobin-binding" domain, these domains are presumably important for a protease-substrate interaction in the complex (28, 36). When enzymatic properties were compared, no significant differences between the purified gingipain complex and the monomeric forms of Rgp and Kgp were found in substrate specificity toward synthetic substrates, optimal pH, thermal stabilities, and inhibitor profiles (data not shown). However, the complex exhibited several distinctive features. The rate of activation of Rgp by Ca2+ and Mg2+ was markedly greater for the complex form (314% by Ca2+ or Mg2+) than for the monomeric form (133% by Ca2+ and 139% by Mg2+). Although the degradation profiles of human soluble proteins such as fibronectin, fibrinogen, and gamma globulin were not different between the complex form and the combination of monomeric forms, the complex exhitied proteolytic activity against FITC-labeled human type I collagen which was more than fivefold more intense than that exhibited by the combined use of monomeric Rgp and Kgp (Fig. 4A). The degradation of collagen by the complex was most strongly inhibited by a combined action of Rgp- and Kgp-specific inhibitors (KYT-1 plus KYT-36), indicating that Rgp and Kgp are responsible for degradation of collagen. The collagenolytic activity of the gingipain complex exhibited 12.5-fold-higher specific activity than collagenase from C. histolyticum. The complex also showed a 1.75-fold-greater degradation against elastin-fluorescein than the combined use of monomeric enzymes (Fig. 4B). The results strongly suggested the assistance of adhesin domains for the catalytic domain to exhibit potent proteolytic activity and the importance of the gingipain complex in periodontal tissue breakdown.
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Degradation of human type I collagen (A) and elastin (B) by the cell-associated complex and the monomeric forms of Rgp and Kgp. FITC-labeled collagen and elastin-fluorescein were incubated with the complex or the monomeric Rgp and/or Kgp in the presence or absence of Rgp and/or Kgp inhibitors as described in Materials and Methods. The collagenase from C. histolyticum was used as the positive control with the same protein amount as the complex. The values are expressed as a ratio to the activity obtained by treatment with the combination of monomeric Rgp and Kgp. RK, a combination of the monomeric forms of Rgp and Kgp; C, the complex; CL, the complex in the presence of leupeptin; CK1, the complex in the presence of KYT-1 (Rgp inhibitor); CK36, the complex in the presence of KYT-36 (Kgp inhibitor); CK1/36, the complex in the presence of KYT-1 and KYT-36; H, collagenase from C. histolyticum. *P < 0.05 and ***P < 0.005 compared with the value for the combination of monomeric Rgp and Kgp.
|
![]() View larger version (18K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Cell viability of human gingival fibroblasts (A) and umbilical vein endothelial cells (B) after treatment with the complex or the monomeric forms of Rgp and Kgp. The cultures of Gin-1 and HUVEC were incubated with the purified complex (containing 2.7 units of Rgp activity and 2.4 units of Kgp activity) or the monomeric Rgp and Kgp equivalent to Rgp and Kgp activities of the complex, respectively. After incubation for 24 h (Gin-1) or 7 h (HUVEC), the cell viability was analyzed by using Cell Counting Kit 8. R, Rgp; K, Kgp; RK, the combined use of Rgp and Kgp; C, the purified complex. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.005 compared with the value for the complex.
|
![]() View larger version (36K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Association of the complex with various phospholipids on liposomes. The purified complex and the monomeric forms of Rgp and Kgp were incubated with equal amounts of various liposomes at 4°C for 1 h in the presence or absence of 1 mM Ca2+. The liposomes were then collected by centrifugation at 105,000 x g for 30 min and resuspended in PBS. The Rgp and Kgp activities bound to liposomes were measured. The values were expressed as percentages of the total activities of both enzymes used. PG, phosphatidylglycerol; PE, phosphatidylethanolamine; SM, sphingomyelin; PS, phosphatidylserine; PC, phosphatidylcholine; PI, phosphatidylinositol; PA, phosphatidyc acid; Car, cardioliopin; Cer, cerebrosides.
|
![]() View larger version (64K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Modification of the cell-associated gingipain complex by attachment of LPS. (A) The purified complex was applied to native polyacrylamide gels. The proteins separated on the gel were then transferred to nitrocellulose membranes and immunostained with the monoclonal antibody to lipid A of LPS. (B) The complex was subjected to SDS-PAGE and stained with Sudan III. (C) The complex was subjected to two-dimensional PAGE followed by immunoblot (IB) analyses. Upper panel, anti-lipid A antibody; middle panel, antibodies recognizing the catalytic domains of both Kgp and Rgp; bottom panel, a combination of anti-Hgp44 antibodies and anti-Hgp27 antibodies, respectively. Immunoreacting spots to anti-lipid A antibody are coincident with the catalytic domains of Rgp (43 kDa) (closed arrowheads), Kgp (51 kDa) (open arrowheads), Hgp44, (asterisks), and Hgp39 (arrow).
|
, IL-1, IL-6, and IL-12 that are important in the host response to infection. Since the purified complex included LPS, the effect of the complex on cytokine production from host cells was investigated. To represent the in vivo situations, the following experiments were performed in the presence of 10% fetal bovine serum. Treatment of mouse peritoneal macrophages with the gingipain complex induced only a small amount of NO2 production (
2 µM) (Fig. 8A). Upon treatment with heat-inactivated complex, however, macrophages produced a high amount of NO2 (
11 µM). Proteinase K treatment of the complex also up-regulated the production of NO2 by macrophages (data not shown). We then examined whether the proteolytic activities in the native complex participated in the down-regulation of LPS activity. Even in the presence of protease inhibitor leupeptin, the complex was confirmed to show little stimulatory activity to macrophages. In addition, the mixture of Rgp, Kgp, and LPS extracted from P. gingivalis by the hot phenol-water method (46) showed a strong NO2-inducing effect corresponding to LPS alone. Accordingly, it seemed that gingipains and/or adhesins in the complex could mask the LPS activity through nonproteolytic actions. To further confirm this, we used human phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate-differentiated THP-1 macrophage (Fig. 8B). Similarly, TNF-
was markedly released from THP-1 cells upon treatment with the heat-denatured complex, whereas this cytokine was barely induced upon treatment with the native complex.
![]() View larger version (27K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. Production of NO2, TNF- , and IL-6 from macrophages upon treatment with the complex. (A) NO2 production from macrophages treated with the complex, LPS, or a combination of Rgp and Kgp was measured. N, native complex; 60, the complex incubated at 60°C for 30 min; B, the boiled complex; L, 1 ng of LPS/ml; LRK, a mixture of LPS, Rgp, and Kgp. The cells were treated with the complex in the absence (black and gray columns) and presence (open columns) of 1 mM leupeptin. (B) TNF- from THP-1 cells. THP-1 cells were incubated with the native (N) or boiled complex (B) for 24 h, and TNF- in the medium was then measured. (C) The production of NO2, TNF- , and IL-6 by macrophages of C57BL/6 mice (a, b) and C3H/HeJ mice (c, d) (n = 5) upon treatment with the native complex (open column) or heat-denatured complex (4 ng/well) (closed column) for 24 h in the presence (for NO2) and absence (for TNF- and IL-6) of gamma interferon (100 U/ml) was analyzed.
|
and IL-6 by macrophages with much higher efficiency than the native protein. However, the production of NO2, TNF-
, and IL-6 by macrophages derived from C3H/HeJ mice was low or undetectable even upon treatment with the native or heat-denatured complex. This finding provides clear evidence that P. gingivalis LPS can be recognized by TLR4 but that the LPS domain responsible for interaction with TLR4 would be masked with the protein components of the complex. P. gingivalis might escape from recognition by inflammatory cells through this strategy. Recently, Calkins et al. (10) reported that TNF-
treated by gingipains was inactivated due to rapid degradation. Sugawara et al. (43) reported that CD14 on human monocytes was decreased by incubation with gingipains. We then examined whether the complex degradation produced TNF-
. Since the enzymatic activities of gingipains were not detectable under the experimental conditions in the presence of 10% serum, the decreased cytokine levels by the complex are unlikely induced by degradation of CD14 or cytokines. To exclude the possibility that the masked LPS is observed only in the purified complex, we examined the cytokine production by macrophages incubated with whole P. gingivalis cells or cell sonicate (Fig. 9). Upon stimulation of intact bacterial cells, the peritoneal macrophages produced a small amount of NO2, up to 2 µM. Mild heat treatment of the bacterium at 55°C, by which bacterial proteins were denatured but intracellular proteins were not leaked out, resulted in approximately 4 µM NO2 production. Degradation of bacterial surface proteins by proteinase K increased NO2 production by macrophages to 5 µM. LPS on the bacterial surface appears to be exposed by these treatments, thereby resulting in the stimulation of host cells. The bacterial cell sonicate induced the most potent NO2 production by the macrophages, probably due to the dissociation of protein components and LPS. Thus, the characteristic structure and features observed in the purified complex seem to represent the native gingipain complex in the bacterial cells.
![]() View larger version (17K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 9. Production of NO2 by mouse peritoneal macrophages incubated with P. gingivalis. Macrophages were incubated with various P. gingivalis cells in the presence of gamma interferon (100 U/ml). N, intact cells; 55, P. gingivalis treated at 55°C for 20 min; PK, P. gingivalis treated with proteinase K (0.5 mg/ml) at 37°C for 30 min; S, P. gingivalis sonicate. After 24 h of incubation, NO2 released into the medium was measured. *P < 0.05 compared with the value obtained with intact P. gingivalis (N).
|
|
|
|---|
We also demonstrated that the complex was modified with LPS through attachment to the protease and Hgp44 domains of Rgp and Kgp. Recent studies using the monoclonal antibody which recognizes sugar portions of LPS have suggested that membrane-associated forms of RgpA, RgpB, and Hgp27 are posttranslationally modified by LPS (12, 45). However, we could not detect the obvious reactivity between the monoclonal antibody to the backbone of lipid A and Hgp27. This result may be due to differences in the antibodies or in the samples used for immunoblot analysis. The crude cell sonicate or outer membrane fraction was used in the previous studies, whereas the purified complex was used in this study. Considering molecular size determined by SDS-PAGE, the protease domain of Rgp in the complex which reacted with anti-lipid A antibody was thought to be derived from RgpA; however, we cannot rule out the possibility that it came from rgpB, which is essentially identical to rgpA except for the lack of a 3' region corresponding to C-terminal adhesin domains. Shoji et al. (40) reported that the porR mutant of P. gingivalis, which is defective in biosynthesis of sugar portions of cell surface polysaccharides, shows the preferential presence of Rgp in culture supernatant. Accordingly, the modification by LPS may contribute to the anchorage of the complex to the cell surface. RgpA and Kgp are synthesized as nascent precursor proteins containing an N-terminal prodomain, a protease domain, and C-terminal domains in the cytosol. They are likely transported across the inner membrane via an Sec translocon, because both RgpA and Kgp possess a signal sequence-like domain at their N termini and because P. gingivalis has homologs of E. coli secA, secD, secF, and secY. They are then transported through the outer membrane to the surface by an unidentified pathway. On the cell surface (or in periplasm), RgpA and Kgp are proteolytically processed, modified by LPS, and formed to the mature complex. As shown by electron microscopy, the complex is composed of a globular particle with an external diameter of 10 nm which contains one or two hole-like structures on the bacterial surface.
The proteolytic activities of the purified complex toward collagen and elastin were very high, whereas those of the monomeric forms of Rgp and Kgp were relatively low (Fig. 4). The Km values for synthetic peptide substrates of the complex were not changed from those of monomeric forms (data not shown). The results thus suggest that the adhesin components raise the affinity of the catalytic domains to these proteins. The complex induced cell death in human gingival fibroblasts and HUVEC with higher efficiency than the combined use of monomeric Rgp and Kgp by a similar effect of adhesins (Fig. 5). We mimicked the adhesion of the complex to cells by using an in vitro liposome-binding experiment (Fig. 6). The monomeric Rgp and Kgp showed little or no binding to any types of liposomes; however, the complex showed significant binding to liposomes consisting of PG, PE, SM, PS, or PC. Eukaryotic plasma membranes preferentially include PC and SM on the outside. Bacterial cytoplasmic membranes are mainly composed of PE and PG. These results indicate that the complex binds directly to membranous lipids of both host and bacterial cells. This implies that the cell-associated complex may play a key role in colonization, coaggregation, hemagglutination, and infection of host cells by P. gingivalis.
In this study, we revealed the existence of LPS in the gingipain complex; however, the purified complex failed to induce the production of NO2, TNF-
, and IL-6 by murine and human macrophages (Fig. 8). The production of these cytokines was significantly increased when the complex was denatured by heat or proteinase K treatment. Inhibition of the proteolytic activities of gingipains in the complex did not stimulate macrophages. These results strongly suggest that LPS is conformationally concealed by protein subunits in the complex and thereby prevented from binding to receptors on the host cell surface. Upon heat treatment, the protein subunits were denatured and LPS was subsequently exposed. This hypothesis was also supported by the facts that TLR4 and TLR2 were not degraded by incubation with the complex or by P. gingivalis infection (unpublished data) and that the LPS purified by using hot phenol methods obviously activated the production of cytokines by the cells. It is generally accepted that TLR4 and its coreceptor MD-2 are the authentic LPS signaling transducers in many cell types. However, the cell activation by P. gingivalis LPS through the TLR4/MD-2-MyD88-dependent pathway is controversial (44). In the present study, P. gingivalis LPS and the denatured gingipain complex obviously increased the production of cytokines by macrophages from C57BL/6 but not from LPS-hyposensitive C3H/HeJ mice (17), indicating that P. gingivalis LPS, as well as classical enterobacterial LPS, has the ability to activate cells via the TLR4 pathway. It has been previously reported that gingipains degrade and inactivate cytokines such as IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-
(7, 10, 31); complement factors C3 and C5 (47); and immunoglobulins (21). We thus conclude that the cell-associated gingipain complex contributes to the suppression of the host immune response to recruit and localize neutrophils and macrophages to gingival inflammatory sites by bacterial infection through evasion of host LPS signaling as well as paralyses of cytokines and facilitates the progression of periodontitis.
This study was supported in part by a grant-in-aid for scientific research from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, Technology, and Culture of Japan.
|
|
|---|
by proteinases (gingipains) from the periodontal pathogen, Porphyromonas gingivalis. Implications of immune evasion. J. Biol. Chem. 273:6611-6614.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»