Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current Issue
• Archive
• Alerts
• About ASM
• Contact us
• Tech Support
• Journals.ASM.org

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Petrofsky, M. Articles by Bermudez, L. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Petrofsky, M. Articles by Bermudez, L. E.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Infection and Immunity, May 2005, p. 2621-2627, Vol. 73, No. 5
0019-9567/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/IAI.73.5.2621-2627.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

CD4⁺ T Cells but Not CD8⁺ or ⁺ Lymphocytes Are Required for Host Protection against Mycobacterium avium Infection and Dissemination through the Intestinal Route

Mary Petrofsky¹ and Luiz E. Bermudez^1,2,3*

Kuzell Institute, California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, San Francisco, California,¹ Department of Biomedical Science, College of Veterinary Medicine, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon,² Department of Microbiology, College of Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon³

Received 11 October 2004/ Returned for modification 19 November 2004/ Accepted 17 January 2005

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Disseminated Mycobacterium avium infection is common in AIDS patients that do not receive anti-AIDS therapy and in patients for whom therapy fails. M. avium is commonly acquired by ingestion, and a large number of AIDS patients have M. avium in their intestinal tracts. To better understand the dynamics of the infection in patients with AIDS, we studied orally infected mice. To determine if immunocompetent mice challenged orally with M. avium can develop protection against the infection, and if so, which cell population(s) is responsible for the protection, we exposed wild-type as well as CD4^–/–, CD8^–/–, and ^–/– knockout mice to low concentrations of M. avium strain 101 given orally, followed by treatment with azithromycin. After 1 month, the mice were challenged with kanamycin-resistant M. avium 104. Only CD4⁺ T cells appeared to be required for protection against the second challenge. Both CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells produced comparable amounts of gamma interferon after the first exposure to the bacterium. Tumor necrosis factor alpha was elevated in CD4⁺ T cells but not in CD8⁺ T cells. Following exposure to a small inoculum of mycobacteria orally, wild-type mice did not develop disseminated infection for approximately 4 months, although viable bacteria could be observed in the mesenteric lymph nodes. The ingestion of small numbers of M. avium cells induces a protective immune response in the intestines against subsequent infection. However, the bacteria remain viable in intestinal lymph nodes and might disseminate later.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Disseminated infections caused by Mycobacterium avium are commonly identified in patients with AIDS that do not receive modern anti-human immunodeficiency virus therapy, as well as in those for whom therapy fails (15, 21). Although initially M. avium was assumed to be acquired by the respiratory tract, the advent of the AIDS epidemic raised our appreciation of the gastrointestinal tract as a main route of M. avium infection for this group of individuals (12, 22).

M. avium is an environmental organism that can be isolated from water and soil (15, 21). A large percentage of the population of patients admitted to hospitals for diverse reasons have serum antibodies against M. avium, suggesting that those individuals were previously exposed to the bacterium (7, 18), most likely through the intestinal tract.

The reason that healthy individuals, in contrast to AIDS patients, do not develop disseminated M. avium infections despite the widespread presence of the bacterium in the environment has not been determined. A number of studies (mainly with mice) have shown that the CD4⁺ T cells have a major role in the specific host defense against M. avium (1, 25), supporting the idea that the absence of CD4⁺ T lymphocytes in patients with AIDS is the main reason for the infection. In addition, using both in vitro and in vivo systems, it has been shown that natural killer (NK) cells participate in the innate response against the pathogen (3, 8). It has been demonstrated that AIDS patients have quantitative and qualitative deficiencies in NK cells (10). In contrast, the protective role of CD8⁺ T lymphocytes has not been established for a mouse model by the use of both specific cytotoxic antibodies against the T-cell population and knockout mice (19, 28, 32). Despite the fact that ⁺ T cells have been suggested to be involved in the defense of the respiratory and intestinal mucosae, studies have also failed to show a role for ⁺ T lymphocytes in mice infected with M. avium by the respiratory route (33). In vitro studies, however, suggested that ⁺ T cells can be cytotoxic to M. avium-infected macrophages (4). Discovering whether ⁺ T cells have any protective role in mice will require future studies using alternative designs.

Since a large majority of healthy individuals have contact with M. avium present in the environment without developing disease, it can be assumed that an effective host response must exist. We hypothesized that constant contact with small numbers of M. avium cells can induce a protective host defense by stimulating a specific T-cell response. It is also not known if M. avium acquired by immunocompetent hosts is killed or persists in a latent form in host cells, in a comparable manner to Mycobacterium tuberculosis, which remains viable for many years in thoracic lymph nodes (14). Observations of the AIDS population indicate that not all individuals with disseminated M. avium disease have the bacterium colonizing the intestinal tract (11). Although culture techniques are still suboptimum, it is possible that in a percentage of the population, the reactivation of the M. avium infection occurs from an internal source such as mesenteric lymph nodes. We therefore evaluated the individual roles of CD4⁺ T cells, CD8⁺ T cells, and ⁺ T cells in the host defense against M. avium acquired by the gastrointestinal route, and we attempted to identify the fate of the bacterium and the route of dissemination in the immunocompetent host.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Mycobacteria. M. avium strain 101 and M. avium strain 104 are clinical isolates from the blood of AIDS patients. MAC 104, which is naturally resistant to kanamycin (MAC 104 Kan^r), was selected by plating 10⁹ M. avium 104 cells on 7H11 agar containing 200 µg/ml of kanamycin. M. avium 101 is susceptible to 200 µg/ml of kanamycin at an inoculum of 10⁸ bacteria. The resistant phenotype was determined to be stable (data not shown). In preliminary experiments, the strain was shown to be equally virulent in both human and murine macrophages (data not shown). For our experiments, bacteria were grown in Middlebrook 7H11 agar (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.) supplemented with oleic acid-albumin-dextrose acid-catalase (Difco, Detroit, Mich.) for 10 days at 37°C as previously described (9). Only transparent colony types were used for this study. Green fluorescent protein (GFP)-expressing MAC 104 was obtained and cultured as previously described (26).

Mice. C57BL/6 wild-type, CD4^–/– C57 BL/6, CD8^–/– C57BL/6, and C57BL/6-Tcrd knockout (KO) mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, Maine) and used after 2 weeks of quarantine.

Infection. C57BL/6 mice (6 to 8 weeks old, approximately 20 g) were given M. avium 101 (100 organisms) by gavage on day 1 and day 8. The mice were then treated with azithromycin (200 mg/kg of body weight/day) orally from day 14 to day 28. On day 35, some mice were harvested and the presence of M. avium was evaluated by plating splenic and intestinal homogenates onto Middlebrook 7H11 agar. The remaining mice were challenged orally with 10⁵ CFU of MAC 104 Km^r. After 4 weeks, the mice were harvested, the terminal ileum, spleen, and liver tissues were homogenized, and the suspension was plated onto 7H11 agar containing 200 µg/ml of kanamycin (6). The numbers of bacteria on the plates were determined after 10 days of incubation. Some mice were infected, and the infection was monitored for up to 6 months.

Purification of CD8 and CD4 T cells and macrophages of intestinal mucosa. Cell purification was carried out as previously described (2, 20). Briefly, intestinal mucosal macrophages were obtained from C57BL/6 mice. Mice were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of Nembutal. Immediately after, the animals were sacrificed, and the abdominal cavity was carefully opened. Two inches (5.08 cm) of the terminal ileal portion of the small intestine was identified, isolated, and further dissected free from the underlying musculature. For removal of the epithelial cells, the intestinal segment was washed twice with Hanks' balanced salt solution (HBSS), minced into small pieces in 10 ml of HBSS containing 0.75 nM EDTA, 500 µg of clindamycin (Upjohn Co., Kalamazoo, Mich.) per ml, and 100 µg of amikacin (Sigma Chemicals, St. Louis, Mo.) per ml, and incubated at 37°C for 2 h. The cell suspension, containing macrophages, epithelial cells, and lymphocytes (approximately 30% of the number of macrophages), was washed twice to remove any residue of antibiotics. A volume of Histopague (Sigma) was added at a 1:2 ratio to the tube. The sample was centrifuged at 1,600 x g for 40 min. Mononuclear cells were removed, resuspended in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS), and centrifuged at 600 x g for 10 min. The pellet, which was rich in macrophages and lymphocytes (approximately 48% of the number of macrophages), was resuspended in RPMI-1640 with 5% FBS and glutamine. The cells were then counted. Averages of 6 x 10⁵ ± 2 x 10⁵ macrophages and 3 x 10⁵ ± 0.9 x 10⁵ lymphocytes were present in the preparations. Macrophages were evaluated for purity by their ability to bind an anti-MAC3 antibody (American Type Culture Collection). Preparations containing <90% macrophages were not used in the reported assays. Lymphocytes were then passed through columns with anti-CD8 or anti-CD4 lymphocyte antibodies according to the recommendations of the manufacturer (Dynal Biotech, Calif.). After elution, the number of cells was established. Macrophages were seeded in Costar 24-well tissue culture plates, and lymphocytes were maintained in Costar 25-ml tissue culture flasks.

Measurement of cytokines. Gamma interferon (IFN-), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-), and interleukin-10 (IL-10) were measured from intestinal macrophages and lymphocytes as previously reported (2, 20). Purified lymphocytes were diluted to 10⁵ cells/ml as a means of standardizing the values. After 24 h in culture in RPMI-1640 with 10% FBS in the presence of M. avium (10⁴ organisms), the supernatant was collected and frozen at –20°C until needed. Cytokine assays were performed as recommended by the manufacturer (Biosource International, Thousand Oaks, Calif.). Macrophages were seeded on plastic (10⁴) and infected with 10⁵ M. avium 101 cells for 1 h. The extracellular bacteria were washed, and infected monolayers were maintained at 37°C. Supernatants for the measurement of IL-10 were obtained at 24 h. Uninfected macrophages or T cells from uninfected mice were used as controls. The sensitivities of the assays for IFN-, TNF-, and IL-10 were 12 ng/ml, 10 ng/ml, and 1 ng/ml, respectively.

M. avium persists in mesenteric lymph nodes. To investigate if bacteria are killed or survive in macrophages in immunocompetent mice without evidence of infection, we infected C57BL/6 mice orally with 100 GFP-M. avium 104 cells and monitored them for 6 months. At 1, 2, 4, and 6 months, mice were harvested and the presence of M. avium was examined in mesenteric lymph nodes and spleens by quantifying the bacterial load as well as by PCR amplification using 23S rRNA primers and fluorescence microscopy. Mesenteric lymph nodes were removed and cells were separated as previously described (20). The cell suspension was then seeded into both 24-well tissue culture plates (Gibco) and Lab-Tek slide chambers (Nunc Inc., Naperville, Ill.) to enrich for macrophages. The monolayers were washed with HBSS after 1 h to remove unattached cells, and macrophages were maintained in culture in the presence of RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS (Sigma). Monolayers in 24-well tissue culture plates were then lysed with sterile water, and lysates were serially diluted and plated onto 7H11 agar plates (6, 9). Macrophages in Lab-Tek slides were fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde for 20 min, washed, mounted, and observed under a Nikon fluorescence microscope for the presence of GFP-expressing bacteria.

Some monolayers were lysed and genetic material was obtained as previously described (13). To determine the viability of bacteria within macrophages, we lysed the monolayers with sterile water and performed a live-dead assay as previously described (5).

23S rRNA and primers. To identify the presence of M. avium in mesenteric lymph nodes, we used the 23S rRNA gene. Lymph nodes were homogenized, and the DNAs in the homogenate were purified as previously reported (20). Briefly, the lysate was suspended in 400 µl of TE buffer (10 mM Tris-Cl, pH 8.0, and 1 mM EDTA) and mixed with 400 µl of phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (pH 8.0) (Sigma). The mixture was added to 500 µl of 0.1-mm-diameter glass beads (Sigma) and vigorously shaken with a mini-bead beater for 3 min at room temperature. The organic and aqueous phases were separated by centrifugation. The DNA was precipitated with a 1/10 volume of sodium acetate (pH 5.2) and 2 volumes of ethanol. After sedimentation, the nucleic acid pellet was dissolved in 50 µl of TE buffer.

The mycobacterial DNA was amplified by PCR, using the following primers specific to the 23S rRNA gene, kindly provided by Kevin Nash (Children's Hospital, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif.): 23.1, 5'ATT GGCG TAAC GACTTCT CAACTGT 3'; and 23.2, 5' GCA CTA GAG GTT CGT CCGT CCC 3'. The 100-µl amplification reaction consisted of 50 mM Tris-Cl, 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl₂, 2.5 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, N.Y.), and 10 µl of DNA. The conditions used were 94°C for 1.5 min, 60°C for 2 min, and 72°C for 3 min. Each reaction was subjected to 35 cycles in a 480 Thermal Cycler (Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, Conn.). Amplification products were analyzed by electrophoresis in a 3% agarose gel.

M. avium dissemination. To investigate if dissemination occurred through the infection of blood monocytes/macrophages, we orally infected 6-week-old C57BL/6 Itgb2 CD18 KO mice and wild-type C57BL/6 mice with 10⁸ M. avium 104 cells and determined the numbers of bacteria in the spleen, liver, and terminal ileum after 1 day, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks. At these time points, mice were harvested and their organs were homogenized and plated onto Middlebrook 7H10 agar as previously reported (6).

Statistical analysis. The differences between results for experimental and control groups were analyzed by Student's t test and analysis of variance. Values are shown as means ± standard deviations of the means + standard errors of the means. P values of <0.05 were considered significant.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Infection of knockout mice. Previous studies using the intravenous route of infection have determined that the presence of CD4 lymphocytes is required for host protection against M. avium (19, 28). Oral inoculation with M. avium resulted in infections of wild-type (WT), CD4^–/–, CD8^–/–, and ^–/– mice (Fig. 1). When mice were given small doses of oral bacteria with the intent to trigger a specific immune response and subsequently reinfected with M. avium, WT mice preexposed to M. avium controlled the infection in a significant manner, while the immunized CD4^–/– KO mice showed the same level of infection as mice that were not exposed to mycobacteria (Fig. 1). Some level of protection against subsequent infection, however, was observed when either CD8^–/– or ^–/– mice were used for the same experimental protocol. As shown in Fig. 1, mice deficient in CD8⁺ T lymphocytes developed protection against an M. avium challenge following exposure to a low concentration of bacteria, which was also observed when mice deficient in T cells were infected with M. avium (Fig. 1).

View larger version (39K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 1. Numbers of organisms in livers (A) and spleens (B) of WT C57BL/6 mice and CD4–/–, CD8–/–, and –/– mice on day 57 after infection. The results are presented as means + standard errors of the means for 20 mice. The spleens weighed between 0.07 and 0.08 g. It is clear that preexposure to the organism is associated with protection for WT, CD8–/–, and –/– mice but not for CD4–/– mice (P < 0.01 for all comparisons).

Production of cytokines. To determine if prior infection with M. avium triggers T-cell activation, we infected mice with 100 CFU of M. avium 101 on days 1 and 8, and 4 weeks after the first challenge, we purified CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T lymphocytes from mesenteric lymph nodes and exposed them to M. avium for 24 h. To ensure that macrophage preparations were not contaminated with lipopolysaccharide, we performed some of the assays with polymyxin B (Sigma) as a control. No difference was observed between assays with and without the presence of polymyxin B (data not shown). Supernatants were then obtained, and the concentrations of IFN-, IL-10, and TNF- were determined. As shown in Table 1, both CD4⁺ T and CD8⁺ T cells from mice exposed to M. avium at a low concentration were able to produce IFN- in a comparable manner, while CD4⁺ T cells produced larger amounts of TNF- than CD8⁺ T cells. The concentrations of IL-10 produced by both CD8⁺ and CD4⁺ T cells were comparable, although there was a trend for more IL-10 production by CD8⁺ T cells than CD4⁺ T cells. Mesenteric lymph node macrophages from infected mice (but not from uninfected mice) produced IL-10 and low concentrations of TNF- (Table 1).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 1. Ex vivo production of IFN- and IL-10 by intestinal cells obtained from C57BL/6 mice

CD18 KO mice and dissemination. To determine if M. avium uses blood mononuclear phagocytes to disseminate, we used CD18 KO mice, in which blood monocytes do not migrate or have an impaired ability to migrate out of the blood vessels (27). The results shown in Table 2 demonstrate that bacteria disseminated equally in both the wild-type and KO strains of mice, suggesting that the primary pathway for dissemination involves something other than blood mononuclear phagocytes. The smaller number of bacteria in the ileum than in the spleen and liver is likely explained by the fact that not all of the bacteria taken up were found in the 2 in. of ileum.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 2. Oral infection and dissemination of bacteria to the liver and spleen in mice orally infected with M. avium

Bacterial location. Because the data obtained with cytokines (high levels of IL-10) suggested that M. avium may still be alive several weeks after infection and since it did in fact survive in the mesenteric lymph nodes following administration of a small dose, we performed experiments to better understand the fate of the bacterium in the host by using wild-type C57BL/6 mice. GFP-M. avium 104 was given orally to wild-type mice (100 organisms), and the infection was followed for 1 to 6 months. Mesenteric lymph nodes and spleens were obtained and teased to obtain single-cell suspensions. The suspensions were then seeded onto Lab-Tek slides in the presence of RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS. The supernatants were then removed, and monolayers were fixed and mounted for fluorescence microscopy with a GFP filter. We observed that M. avium was present in the mesenteric lymph nodes but not in the spleens until later time points (Table 3). In addition, we observed that M. avium was present within phagocytic cells (Fig. 2). The spleens and lymph nodes (five per mouse) were also prepared, and DNAs were extracted. PCR amplification determined that M. avium was present in mesenteric lymph nodes after 1 month of infection and in the spleen 4 months following oral challenge. The bacteria were viable in the organs, as determined by their ability to grow in 7H11 agar.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 3. Amounts of bacteria and PCR amplification of 23S rRNA from mesenteric lymph nodes and spleens of mice infected with M. avium

View larger version (189K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 2. Presence of GFP-M. avium in the mesenteric lymph nodes of mice infected for 6 months. Mesenteric lymph nodes were obtained from mice that had been infected for 6 months, and the suspension was placed on a Lab-Tek slide for adherence of the macrophages. After 1 h, the chamber was washed and subsequently fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde for 20 min. Monolayers were washed with HBSS, mounted, and observed for GFP-expressing bacteria under a Nikon microscope using a GFP filter. M. avium was not detected in uninfected mice by PCR amplification.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Healthy individuals are exposed to microbes that are present in the environment. M. avium is encountered in soil and water, and therefore the large majority of the population should have had exposure to the bacterium. Epidemiologic studies have confirmed this assumption, with most individuals showing M. avium-specific antibodies in the serum (7).

The results of research during the last several years have demonstrated that AIDS patients develop disseminated M. avium infection following ingestion or inhalation of the bacterium (12, 15, 21, 22). In addition, M. avium has been shown to interact with the intestinal-tract mucosa and to translocate the mucosal barrier (29). For humans, a large number of bacteria can be seen infecting macrophages in the lamina propria (12).

For this study, we employed a mouse model of oral infection to address the following questions. (i) If the majority of individuals are exposed to and infected with M. avium, what prevents them from developing the disease? (ii) Once the bacterium crosses the intestinal mucosae of healthy individuals, what is the fate of the organism?

Our results show that CD4⁺ T cells, but not CD8⁺ T cells or ⁺ T cells, are required for host protection against M. avium infection by the gastrointestinal route, and they agree with the observation for AIDS patients that seems to indicate that CD4⁺ T cells are mainly responsible for the protective adaptive response against the bacterium. Our study indicates that continued infection by a small number of M. avium organisms results in degrees of protection against infection. This observation agrees with previous work by Fattorini and colleagues showing that the delivery of a small number of M. avium organisms by the nasal or intraperitoneal route induced protection against a subsequent challenge in BALB/c mice (16). This exposure was followed by the appearance of subpopulations of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells specific for M. avium in the intestinal tract. Although the two populations of T cells in our study could produce IFN- upon exposure to M. avium, only CD4⁺ T cell KO mice, and not CD8⁺ T cell KO mice, developed disseminated infection secondary to an oral challenge. Previous studies have shown that CD8⁺ T cells do not appear to have a role in the host defense against M. avium in mice (19, 28, 32), in contrast with the evidence for M. tuberculosis infection (17). The lack of CD8⁺ T cell participation in the host defense was observed in studies using the respiratory as well as the systemic route of infection (19, 28, 32). Our data confirm past observations but add results for a challenge through the gastrointestinal tract. Mouse CD8⁺ T cells, in contrast to human CD8⁺ T cells, do not express granulysin, which has been associated with the host defense against M. tuberculosis (34). Whether the absence of granulysin is the reason for the lack of a role for CD8⁺ T cells in mice is presently unknown. Interestingly, intestinal CD8⁺ T cells were sensitized to M. avium antigens and produced IFN- when exposed in vitro to the bacterium. However, they did not confer any measurable protection against infection. A recent study of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium infection of mice evidenced that dissemination from the mesenteric lymph nodes was prevented by the presence of IFN- (24). In the case of M. avium infection, we suggest that IFN- is likely important for the prevention of dissemination, but other factors are potentially required. Studies of mice have established the importance of IFN- in the host defense against M. avium (1, 25), perhaps following secretion by NK cells as well as CD4⁺ T cells. However, the optimum host response requires TNF- (31). In fact, our results suggest that TNF- production by CD4⁺ T cells might be, at least in part, the explanation for the protection offered by CD4⁺ T cells. In addition, the slightly higher level of IL-10 produced by CD8⁺ T cells than that produced by CD4⁺ T cells might have an impact. Macrophages from infected mice do not produce TNF- in large amounts during established infections, which supports the idea that M. avium infection suppresses cytokine production. The lack of contribution from T cells to the host defense was also surprising. This population of lymphocytes is mainly found in the mucosa and submucosa and is assumed to participate in the host defense against invasive pathogens (36). Our data, however, support previous observations with a mouse model of lung infection (33).

Once in the intestinal mucosa, M. avium must use either the blood (transport within cells or direct translocation across endothelial cells) or the lymphatic system to disseminate. Using CD18 KO mice with a significant defect in translocating across the endothelial wall, we observed that tissue macrophages and blood monocytes are not the primary form of dissemination of infection. Studies with S. enterica serovar Typhimurium employing the same mouse system have shown that macrophages can transport Salmonella to distant organs (35). Our evidence suggests that after crossing the intestinal barriers, M. avium uses either the lymphatic system or is capable of invading the endothelial wall of the mesenteric vessels, although because CD18 KO leukocytes still can enter tissue, we cannot absolutely rule out macrophages as a source of dissemination.

For our study, the lungs were excised as a possible organ to which M. avium disseminates. The data were not conclusive, and additional work would be necessary to address relevant areas of this issue (data not shown).

M. avium was able to establish persistent infections, although dissemination took a long time to occur in mice infected with a small inoculum. Recent work has demonstrated that M. avium invades the mucosal epithelium but does not trigger chemokine production (30). In vivo, it can be documented by the lack of an inflammatory response early in the infection (23). This likely represents a pathogenic trait by which the bacterium can establish a niche before being exposed to phagocytic cells. Once the infection spreads, bacteria would infect mesenteric lymph node macrophages. Immunosuppression would likely be associated with M. avium dissemination. This observation perhaps explains why some AIDS patients develop disseminated disease without evidence of a source of infection. In addition, it also indicates that many individuals are potential carriers of the infection and may develop infections in joints, bones, kidneys, and other sites following dissemination. The model is amenable to genetic analysis, which would allow us to dissect bacterial factors associated with persistence and to explain the failure of the immune system to control the infection.

 
We thank Karen Allen and Denny Weber for preparing the manuscript. We also thank Felix Sangari and Elizabeth Miltner for technical help with the detection of 23S rRNA and Peter Kolonoski for technical help with the experiment with mice.

This work was supported by grant R01-AI25767 from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: 105 Magruder Hall, Dept. of Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331. Phone: (541) 737-6538. Fax: (541) 737-8035. E-mail: luiz.bermudez{at}oregonstate.edu.

Editor: J. D. Clements

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 

1
1. Appelberg, R., A. G. Castro, J. Pedrosa, R. A. Silva, I. M. Orme, and P. Minoprio. 1994. Role of gamma interferon and tumor necrosis factor alpha during T-cell-independent and -dependent phases of Mycobacterium avium infection. Infect. Immun. 62:3962-3971.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2
2. Azouaou, N., M. Petrofsky, L. S. Young, and L. E. Bermudez. 1997. Mycobacterium avium infection in mice is associated with time-related expression of Th1 and Th2 CD4+ T-lymphocyte response. Immunology 91:414-420.[CrossRef][Medline]
3
3. Bermudez, L. E., P. Kolonoski, and L. S. Young. 1990. Natural killer cell activity and macrophage-dependent inhibition of growth or killing of Mycobacterium avium complex in a mouse model. J. Leukoc. Biol. 47:135-141.[Abstract]
4
4. Bermudez, L. E., N. Mohagheghpour, S. Khajavi, M. Petrofsky, and L. S. Young. 1995. Activated gamma delta T cells can both lyse Mycobacterium avium-infected human macrophages and stimulate macrophage mycobacteriostatic activity. Immunol. Infect. Dis. 5:183-189.
5
5. Bermudez, L. E., A. Parker, and J. R. Goodman. 1997. Growth within macrophages increases the efficiency of Mycobacterium avium in invading other macrophages by a complement receptor-independent pathway. Infect. Immun. 65:1916-1925.[Abstract]
6
6. Bermudez, L. E., M. Petrofsky, P. Kolonoski, and L. S. Young. 1992. An animal model of Mycobacterium avium complex disseminated infection after colonization of the intestinal tract. J. Infect. Dis. 165:75-79.[Medline]
7
7. Bermudez, L. E., M. Wu, H. Enkel, and L. S. Young. 1989. Naturally occurring antibodies against Mycobacterium avium complex. Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci. 19:435-443.[Abstract]
8
8. Bermudez, L. E., and L. S. Young. 1991. Natural killer cell-dependent mycobacteriostatic and mycobactericidal activity in human macrophages. J. Immunol. 146:265-270.[Abstract]
9
9. Bermudez, L. E., L. S. Young, and H. Enkel. 1991. Interaction of Mycobacterium avium complex with human macrophages: roles of membrane receptors and serum proteins. Infect. Immun. 59:1697-1702.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10
10. Bonavida, B., J. Katz, and M. Gottlieb. 1986. Mechanism of defective NK cell activity in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) and AIDS-related complex. I. Defective trigger on NK cells for NKCF production by target cells, and partial restoration by IL 2. J. Immunol. 137:1157-1163.[Abstract]
11
11. Burman, W. J., and D. L. Cohn. 1996. Clinical disease in human immunodeficiency virus-infected persons, p. 79-108. In J. A. Korvick and C. A. Benson (ed.), Mycobacterium avium—complex infection, progress in research and treatment. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, N.Y.
12
12. Damsker, B., and E. J. Bottone. 1985. Mycobacterium avium-Mycobacterium intracellulare from the intestinal tracts of patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome: concepts regarding acquisition and pathogenesis. J. Infect. Dis. 151:179-181.[Medline]
13
13. Danelishvili, L., M. Poort, and L. E. Bermudez. 2004. Identification of Mycobacterium avium genes up-regulated in cultured macrophages and in mice. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 239:41-49.[CrossRef][Medline]
14
14. Dannenberg, A. M., Jr. 1982. Pathogenesis of pulmonary tuberculosis. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 125:25-29.[Medline]
15
15. Falkinham, J. O., III. 1996. Epidemiology of infection by nontuberculous mycobacteria. Clin. Microbiol. Rev 9:177-215.[Medline]
16
16. Fattorini, L., R. Nisini, Y. Fan, Y. J. Li, D. Tan, S. Mariotti, R. Teloni, E. Iona, and G. Orefici. 2002. Exposure of BALB/c mice to low doses of Mycobacterium avium increases resistance to a subsequent high-dose infection. Microbiology 148:3173-3181.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17
17. Flynn, J. L., M. M. Goldstein, K. J. Triebold, B. Koller, and B. R. Bloom. 1992. Major histocompatibility complex class I-restricted T cells are required for resistance to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:12013-12017.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18
18. Fry, K. L., P. S. Meissner, and J. O. Falkinham III. 1986. Epidemiology of infection by nontuberculous mycobacteria. VI. Identification and use of epidemiologic markers for studies of Mycobacterium avium, M. intracellulare, and M. scrofulaceum. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 134:39-43.[Medline]
19
19. Gilbertson, B., J. Zhong, and C. Cheers. 1999. Anergy, IFN-gamma production, and apoptosis in terminal infection of mice with Mycobacterium avium. J. Immunol. 163:2073-2080.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20
20. Hsu, N., L. S. Young, and L. E. Bermudez. 1995. Response to stimulation with recombinant cytokines and synthesis of cytokines by murine intestinal macrophages infected with the Mycobacterium avium complex. Infect. Immun. 63:528-533.[Abstract]
21
21. Inderlied, C. B., C. A. Kemper, and L. E. Bermudez. 1993. The Mycobacterium avium complex. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 6:266-310.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22
22. Jacobson, M. A., P. C. Hopewell, D. M. Yajko, W. K. Hadley, E. Lazarus, P. K. Mohanty, G. W. Modin, D. W. Feigal, P. S. Cusick, and M. A. Sande. 1991. Natural history of disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex infection in AIDS. J. Infect. Dis. 164:994-998.[Medline]
23
23. Kim, S. Y., J. R. Goodman, M. Petrofsky, and L. E. Bermudez. 1998. Mycobacterium avium infection of gut mucosa in mice associated with late inflammatory response and intestinal cell necrosis. J. Med. Microbiol. 47:725-731.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24
24. Monack, D. M., D. M. Bouley, and S. Falkow. 2004. Salmonella typhimurium persists within macrophages in the mesenteric lymph nodes of chronically infected Nramp1^+/+ mice and can be reactivated by IFN- neutralization. J. Exp. Med. 199:231-241.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25
25. Orme, I. M., and F. M. Collins. 1984. Immune response to atypical mycobacteria: immunocompetence of heavily infected mice measured in vivo fails to substantiate immunosuppression data obtained in vitro. Infect. Immun. 43:32-37.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26
26. Parker, A. E., and L. E. Bermudez. 1997. Expression of the green fluorescent protein (GFP) in Mycobacterium avium as a tool to study the interaction between mycobacteria and host cells. Microb. Pathog. 22:193-198.[CrossRef][Medline]
27
27. Plow, E. F., and L. Zhang. 1997. A MAC-1 attack: integrin functions directly challenged in knockout mice. J. Clin. Investig. 99:1145-1146.[Medline]
28
28. Roger, P. M., and L. E. Bermudez. 2001. Infection of mice with Mycobacterium avium primes CD8+ lymphocytes for apoptosis upon exposure to macrophages. Clin. Immunol. 99:378-386.[CrossRef][Medline]
29
29. Sangari, F. J., J. Goodman, M. Petrofsky, P. Kolonoski, and L. E. Bermudez. 2001. Mycobacterium avium invades the intestinal mucosa primarily by interacting with enterocytes. Infect. Immun. 69:1515-1520.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30
30. Sangari, F. J., M. Petrofsky, and L. E. Bermudez. 1999. Mycobacterium avium infection of epithelial cells results in inhibition or delay in the release of interleukin-8 and RANTES. Infect. Immun. 67:5069-5075.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31
31. Sarmento, A., and R. Appelberg. 1996. Involvement of reactive oxygen intermediates in tumor necrosis factor alpha-dependent bacteriostasis of Mycobacterium avium. Infect. Immun. 64:3224-3230.[Abstract]
32
32. Saunders, B. M., and C. Cheers. 1995. Inflammatory response following intranasal infection with Mycobacterium avium complex: role of T-cell subsets and gamma interferon. Infect. Immun. 63:2282-2287.[Abstract]
33
33. Saunders, B. M., A. A. Frank, A. M. Cooper, and I. M. Orme. 1998. Role of gamma delta T cells in immunopathology of pulmonary Mycobacterium avium infection in mice. Infect. Immun. 66:5508-5514.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34
34. Shen, Y., D. Zhou, L. Qiu, X. Lai, M. Simon, L. Shen, Z. Kou, Q. Wang, L. Jiang, J. Estep, R. Hunt, M. Clagett, P. K. Sehgal, Y. Li, X. Zeng, C. T. Morita, M. B. Brenner, N. L. Letvin, and Z. W. Chen. 2002. Adaptive immune response of Vgamma2Vdelta2+ T cells during mycobacterial infections. Science 295:2255-2258.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35
35. Vazquez-Torres, A., J. Jones-Carson, A. J. Baumler, S. Falkow, R. Valdivia, W. Brown, M. Le, R. Berggren, W. T. Parks, and F. C. Fang. 1999. Extraintestinal dissemination of Salmonella by CD18-expressing phagocytes. Nature 401:804-808.[CrossRef][Medline]
36
36. Yamamoto, S., F. Russ, H. C. Teixeira, P. Conradt, and S. H. Kaufmann. 1993. Listeria monocytogenes-induced gamma interferon secretion by intestinal intraepithelial gamma/delta T lymphocytes. Infect. Immun. 61:2154-2161.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

---

Infection and Immunity, May 2005, p. 2621-2627, Vol. 73, No. 5
0019-9567/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/IAI.73.5.2621-2627.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Fuschillo, S., De Felice, A., Balzano, G. (2008). Mucosal inflammation in idiopathic bronchiectasis: cellular and molecular mechanisms. Eur Respir J 31: 396-406 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Danelishvili, L., Wu, M., Stang, B., Harriff, M., Cirillo, S., Cirillo, J., Bildfell, R., Arbogast, B., Bermudez, L. E. (2007). Identification of Mycobacterium avium pathogenicity island important for macrophage and amoeba infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104: 11038-11043 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Hovav, A.-H., Cayabyab, M. J., Panas, M. W., Santra, S., Greenland, J., Geiben, R., Haynes, B. F., Jacobs, W. R. Jr., Letvin, N. L. (2007). Rapid Memory CD8+ T-Lymphocyte Induction through Priming with Recombinant Mycobacterium smegmatis. J. Virol. 81: 74-83 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Flaherty, D. K., Vesosky, B., Beamer, G. L., Stromberg, P., Turner, J. (2006). Exposure to Mycobacterium avium can modulate established immunity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection generated by Mycobacterium bovis BCG vaccination. J. Leukoc. Biol. 80: 1262-1271 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Petrofsky, M. Articles by Bermudez, L. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Petrofsky, M. Articles by Bermudez, L. E.