Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, June 2005, p. 3817-3822, Vol. 73, No. 6
0019-9567/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/IAI.73.6.3817-3822.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Vittorio Sambri,1*,
Antonella Marangoni,1
Francesca Cavrini,1
Elisa Storni,1
Manuela Donati,1
Silvia Corona,2
Paolo Lanzarini,2 and
Roberto Cevenini1
Sezione di Microbiologia DMCSS, Università degli Studi di Bologna, Bologna, Italy,1 Dipartimento di Malattie Infettive, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy2
Received 26 October 2004/ Returned for modification 14 December 2004/ Accepted 29 January 2005
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (35K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Schematic representation of predicted TprI protein in comparison to the other subfamily I Tprs of T. pallidum subsp. pallidum, Nichols strain. Identical patterns indicate amino acid sequence identity among the members. TprI and -F amino-terminal regions are 98% identical to the corresponding sequences of TprC and -D. TprI and TprC and -D carboxyl termini are 94% identical. *, NH2-terminal signal peptide (first 17 amino acids). 1, tprF presents deletions in the sequence coding for portions of the central region and the COOH-terminal region, with a resulting frameshift ( ) and premature termination.
|
The source, propagation, and extraction of T. pallidum subsp. pallidum, Nichols strain, were previously reported (16).
The QIAamp DNA Mini kit (QIAGEN) and TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) were used to isolate DNA and RNA, respectively. cDNA was synthesized from DNase I-treated RNA with the SuperScript First-Strand Synthesis System (Invitrogen) using random primers according to the provided protocol. The tprI message was amplified using specific primers (Table 1). The amplification was performed in 50 µl, containing 0.5 µM primers, 200 µM deoxynucleoside triphosphates, 1.5 mM MgCl2, and 2 U of recombinant DNA polymerase (TaKaRa). PCR conditions were 2 min at 95°C, followed by 1 min at 95°C, 1 min at 60°C, and 1 min at 72°C, for 35 cycles. Final extension was 72°C for 3 min.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Primers
|
Expression of the full-length recombinant TprI (rTprI) and its subunits was induced with IPTG (isopropyl-ß-D-thiogalactopyranoside) at 0.8 mM final concentration for 3 h at 37°C after the cultures entered log-phase growth and evaluated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) of whole-cell lysates using standard protocols (24). Lysates were obtained by resuspending cell pellets in 1x sample buffer (2% SDS, 10% beta-mercaptoethanol, 60 mM Tris [pH 6.8], 0.01% bromophenol blue) and boiling them for 5 min. Antigens were purified by nickel affinity chromatography under denaturing conditions with the His-Bind Purification kit (Novagen) according to the provided protocol. To solubilize the antigens from inclusion bodies, sonicated cultures were incubated in ice for 1 h in 1x binding buffer (0.5 M NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, 5 mM imidazole, pH 7.9) containing 6 M urea. Elution fractions were checked for purity by SDS-PAGE and dialyzed against saline containing decreasing concentrations of urea. Densitometric analysis with the Rainbow Marker (Amersham) as a standard was used for quantification. The antigens were stored in 75-µg/ml aliquots at 80°C.
Two New Zealand White rabbits that had previously tested seronegative for syphilis were infected intratesticularly with 5 x 107 treponemes. Sera were collected prior to infection, at day 10, and approximately every 30 days thereafter until day 120 postinfection. Sera collected at day 30 were tested for syphilis by Western blotting (WB), evaluating reactivity to the TpN47, TmpA, TpN17, and TpN15 antigens as already described (15).
To test reactivity against the recombinant antigens, nitrocellulose strips were prepared for each of them as previously described (22, 26). Sera from infected and rTprI-immunized (described below) animals, 150 sera from patients with syphilis at different stages (Table 2), and 50 control sera from blood donors were tested. Briefly, strips were incubated overnight either in rabbit or human sera diluted 1:100 in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)-0.05% Tween 20. Antigen-antibody complexes were detected with a specific peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (either goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G [IgG] or rabbit anti-human IgG; Dako) diluted 1:500 in PBS-0.05% Tween 20, and 4-chloro-1-naphthol (Bio-Rad) as already described (23). To avoid bias, investigators evaluating results were blinded to the group of sera being tested. The Human Subjects Committee of the University of Bologna approved the use of these sera for research purposes.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Immune response analysis of human sera to recombinant TprI antigens
|
Sera collected from rTprI-immunized rabbits were pooled, and the IgG was purified using the ImmunoPure IgG Purification kit (Pierce). To minimize possible nonspecific binding of unrelated antibodies, solution collected after chromatography was further enriched in rTprI-specific antibodies by absorption and elution from an rTprI-coated nitrocellulose support following a standard protocol (21). The purified fraction was tested for retained ability to recognize the recombinant antigens as described above.
For electron microscopy (EM) investigation, treponemes were harvested in 0.15 M PBS supplemented with 2% (vol/vol) heat-inactivated noninfected rabbit serum and transported under anaerobic conditions to the electron microscopy facility without any further manipulation. After separation from host gross cellular debris by low-speed centrifugation (250 x g for 10 min at room temperature), the specimen was checked for motility and fixed in 0.1% (wt/vol) cacodylate buffer (pH 7.2) containing 2% paraformaldehyde and 0.5% glutaraldehyde for 1 h at 4°C. A sample was then rinsed in the same buffer, dehydrated in ethanol, and embedded in LR White (London Resin Co). Sections were prepared as previously reported (11), and immunostaining was performed following a reported protocol (2) using anti-rTprI as the primary antibody and goat anti-rabbit IgG conjugated with 12-nm colloidal gold particles (Jackson ImmunoResearch) as the secondary antibody.
Control immunostaining reactions were performed with a rabbit anti-47-kDa lipoprotein primary antibody purified from a Nichols-infected animal (native 47-kDa antigen used in the absorption-elution protocol was previously isolated by SDS-PAGE and blotting from cultured treponemes) and with secondary antibody alone.
tprI transcriptional analysis resulted in a specific amplicon when cDNA was analyzed (Fig. 2). Control amplifications confirmed the correct execution of the protocol. All of the sera collected from rabbits experimentally infected with T. pallidum failed to recognize the full-length rTprI and its regions. Sera collected prior to infection were equally nonreactive (data not shown). However, a serological test for syphilis (WB) confirmed the infection was established, because sera were reactive to all four T. pallidum antigens (TpN47, TmpA, TpN17, and TpN15).
![]() View larger version (77K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Amplification of T. pallidum Nichols strain cDNA using primers specific for the central nonconserved region of tprI. Lanes: 1, molecular weight marker; 2, cDNA; 3, DNase-treated RNA; 4, no template; 5, non-DNase-treated RNA; 6, DNA. All sizes are in bp.
|
Comparison of immunological parameters and lesion development between rTprI-immunized and control rabbits was used to investigate rTprI protective ability. Prior to challenge, sera from rTprI-immunized rabbits were shown to be reactive to the full-length antigen and its three subunits (data not shown). Reactivity against recombinant OMP2 was seen in sera from the control rabbits. Cutaneous lesions of rTprI-immunized rabbits appeared flatter and paler and healed faster because they did not ulcerate (Table 3). Erythema at the challenge sites was visible within an average of 3 and 4 days in rTprI- and OMP2-immunized rabbits, respectively, and average dimensions of lesions 2 weeks after challenge were 9.2 mm in rTprI-immunized rabbits and 8.8 mm in control animals. Starting at day 16, lesions of rTprI-immunized rabbits gradually healed, while lesions in control rabbits progressed to ulceration. At the end of the observation period, average dimensions were 4.2 mm in rTprI-immunized rabbits and 19.3 mm in control rabbits. Overall, immunization with rTprI was not protective, because all of the rabbits challenged seroconverted (Table 3).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Protection against experimental infection after immunization with recombinant full-length TprI
|
![]() View larger version (115K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Immunoelectron microscopy analysis of TprI antigen locations on T. pallidum cells. (A, B) Pictures from two different immunostaining reactions performed with anti-rTprI primary antibody. (C) Analysis of the 47-kDa lipoprotein location on T. pallidum cells. (D) Negative control (no primary antibody). Arrows indicate colloidal gold positions on bacterial cells. Bar length is 0.3 µm.
|
Immune response characterization using a panel of human sera from syphilis patients showed an early reactivity to the full-length rTprI (basically directed against its amino-terminal region and partially against the carboxyl terminus); only two cases of primary syphilis whose onset was less than 1 week before the blood sample was taken were negative. This result is partially in agreement with the reported data on the immunogenicity of subfamily I Tprs during experimental infection with non-Nichols strains (12). In that case, however, reactivity against the TprI central region could also be detected, as well as an early immune response against the conserved amino terminus when some strains were used (12, 25). Our data suggest either that, during the course of natural infection, the TprI central region is not immunogenic or that the antigen synthesis in vivo is not sufficient to induce a measurable immune response. On the other hand, the signal detected against the amino and carboxyl termini could also be generated by the immune response against other subfamily I members, which share those regions.
Although no protective capability can be attributed to this antigen, we showed that immunization with full-length rTprI significantly altered lesion development after challenge. This supports the actual translation of subfamily I antigens (and possibly TprI) in the Nichols strain during the course of infection in rabbits, although antibody response against these proteins may be difficult to detect with the system we adopted. A possible explanation for this discrepancy may involve the purification protocol of rTprI, which implies denaturation of the antigen from Escherichia coli inclusion bodies. No renaturation protocol (dialysis against decreasing concentrations of denaturing agent and ion-exchange or hydrophobic interaction chromatography) attempted in our laboratory allowed the purification of an antigen potentially more similar in structure to the native protein. During immunization, we likely induced a response mainly directed toward linear epitopes of rTprI, due to the fact that the conformational epitopes were unavailable to the immune system. It is possible that lack of immune response to conformational epitopes might have partially influenced the outcome of the protection assay and the results of serum reactivity analysis.
EM results confirmed that translation of subfamily I Tprs occurs during experimental infection with the Nichols strain, also showing a situation consistent with the paucity of these antigens on the T. pallidum cell. Colloidal gold particles, however, specifically marked both the external layer of the outer membrane and the cellular periplasmic space, calling into question any conclusion regarding antigen location. Because the primary antibody used was directed toward the full-length antigen, the concurrent identification of the other subfamily I members (TprF shares the hypothetical location of TprI) besides TprI cannot be ruled out, and a signal within the periplasm could also be attributed to an inner membrane protein protruding toward this cellular compartment (TprC and -D are predicted to be inner membrane proteins). Although the TprI location will be further investigated using a specific antiserum against the central region of the protein (possibly obtained with a recombinant peptide in its native conformation), the EM approach seems to promise to achieve this goal.
We are extremely grateful to Sheila Lukehart for her kind and helpful comments and suggestions to improve the quality of the manuscript.
Lorenzo Giacani and Vittorio Sambri contributed equally to this work. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»