Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, February 2006, p. 1305-1312, Vol. 74, No. 2
0019-9567/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/IAI.74.2.1305-1312.2006
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Veronika Fuss,
Jutta Steigerwald,
and
Heidrun Moll*
Institute for Molecular Infection Biology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
Received 19 August 2005/ Returned for modification 23 September 2005/ Accepted 19 November 2005
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
A critical part of the chain of events leading to degradation and death of intracellular microorganisms, including Leishmania sp. parasites, in macrophages is phagolysosome biogenesis. Newly formed phagosomes are unable to digest their contents and must therefore undergo a complex maturation process, which is driven by a series of sequential fusion events between phagosomes and early endosomes, late endosomes, and lysosomes (1, 10, 14). Each phagosome maturation stage is characterized by specific compartmental markers, such as the early endosomal markers CD71 and Rab4, the late endosomal markers Rab7 and CD68, and the late endosomal/lysosomal glycoproteins LAMP-1 and LAMP-2. These steps lead to the formation of the phagolysosome, an acidic compartment displaying the harsh and lytic environment needed to destroy microorganisms and process microbial antigens for presentation to the specific immune system.
To date, the information on PV harboring Leishmania sp. is derived almost exclusively from studies with macrophages. However, we (3, 25, 32) and others (15, 18, 21, 27, 31) have shown that dendritic cells (DC) also internalize Leishmania sp. parasites and are the most potent antigen-presenting cells for initiation and regulation of the specific T-cell response. The properties of DC vary with the different stages of their life span. DC in nonlymphoid tissues are immature cells which can phagocytose and process particles but are only weak stimulators of T-cell immune responses. The differentiation of DC is triggered by exposure to pathogens or inflammatory cytokines. It is accompanied by a loss of endocytic activity and a marked upregulation of their antigen presentation and costimulatory functions (2, 13). Although it has been demonstrated that Leishmania sp. parasites internalized by DC reside within endocytic vacuoles (11, 15, 27), the endosomal trafficking routes in DC and the remodeling of the endosome/lysosome compartment of infected DC during their maturation are largely unknown.
In the present study, we used L. major, a cause of human cutaneous leishmaniasis, to analyze the properties of parasite-containing PV in DC of different maturation stages. Phagolysosome biogenesis was assessed by fluorescence labeling of endocytic marker proteins and confocal laser microscopy. Furthermore, we characterized the fusion competence of PV harboring L. major in DC, and we examined whether different life cycle stages of L. major induce distinct pathways of phagosome maturation in DC. The results show that L. major-harboring PV in DC did not acquire the whole array of molecules typical for lysosomal organelles and had a reduced capacity to fuse with lysosomes. The impaired fusion activity was most pronounced in immature DC. Moreover, our data demonstrate that the highest level of inhibition of endosome-lysosome fusion in immature DC was induced by live promastigotes, whereas killed organisms were not effective and amastigotes established only a partial block of PV fusion with lysosomes.
|
|
|---|
Parasites and treatment of DC with L. major. The cloned virulent L. major isolate (MHOM/IL/81/FE/BNI) was maintained by passage in BALB/c mice. Amastigotes were isolated from skin lesions as described previously (4). Promastigotes were grown in vitro in blood agar cultures. For analysis by confocal microscopy, parasites were stained with green fluorescent cell tracker 5-chloromethylfluorescein diacetate (CMFDA) or red fluorescent cell tracker 5- and 6-4-chloromethylbenzoylaminotetramethylrhodamine (CMTMR) (Molecular Probes, Leiden, Netherlands) prior to their use for infection according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, stationary-phase promastigotes were incubated at 27°C and amastigotes at 37°C for 45 min with 30 µM CMFDA or 10 µM CMTMR. After being washed, they were incubated for an additional 30 min at the appropriate temperature in fresh culture medium. The promastigotes were not complement opsonized. For some experiments, stationary-phase promastigotes were heat killed at 80°C for 30 min after the staining procedure. FSDC and BMDC were treated with stationary-phase promastigotes at a ratio of 2:1 or with amastigotes at a ratio of 4:1. After 30 min of exposure to parasites at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2, unbound extracellular parasites were removed by washing the cells three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). To analyze PV biogenesis, DC were examined for the expression of endosomal marker proteins either immediately (0.5-h value) or after the addition of fresh culture medium and incubation for a further 0.5 to 23.5 h (1-, 2-, 4-, and 24-h values), using intracellular immunostaining and confocal microscopy. The average number of parasites per infected DC was determined by counting 100 to 200 immature DC (6 days) or mature DC (10 days) at 24 and 72 h after pulse infection with stationary-phase promastigotes for 30 min. The parasite load was quantified by staining with acridine orange (Sigma-Aldrich) and ethidium bromide (Sigma-Aldrich) and analysis by fluorescence microscopy at 495 nm (26).
Loading of DC with endocytic tracers. For analysis of the fusion ability of PV with lysosomes, DC seeded into chamber slides (6 x 105 cells in 0.4 ml of culture medium per chamber) were exposed to CMFDA-stained L. major parasites. After 30 min, free extracellular parasites were removed by repeated washing with PBS, and 1 µM LysoTracker Red DND-99 (Molecular Probes), preferentially labeling lysosomes as the main acidic compartments, was added for 30 min. Thereafter, the supernatants were removed from each well, and fresh culture medium was added for the remaining culture period of 23 h. Alternatively, DC were incubated for 30 min at 37°C with 1 mg/ml lysine-fixable tetramethylrhodamine-coupled dextran (Mr, 10,000 or 70,000) (Molecular Probes), washed, and then cultured overnight in tracer-free culture medium to allow the accumulation of fluorescent tracer molecules in lysosomes. Subsequently, the cells were exposed to CMFDA-stained parasites at 37°C for 30 min. Thereafter, they were washed with PBS to remove free parasites and were cultured for a further 23.5 h.
Intracellular immunostaining of proteins of the PV and analysis by confocal microscopy. At different time points (0.5, 1, 2, 4, or 24 h) after DC exposure to stationary-phase promastigotes for 30 min (see above), the cells were washed with PBS containing 0.25 mM MgCl2 and 0.35 mM CaCl2, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, and then permeabilized with 0.2% saponin in blocking solution (10% goat serum in PBS containing Mg2+ and Ca2+). Thereafter, DC were incubated for 45 min at room temperature in a humid chamber with one of the following primary antibodies in saponin-containing blocking solution: monoclonal antibody (MAb) C2, a rat immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) recognizing mouse CD71 (transferrin receptor) (BD Pharmingen, Heidelberg, Germany), fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated rat anti-mouse LAMP-2 MAb (BD Pharmingen), rabbit anti-mouse Rab4 antibodies (Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, Calif.), rabbit anti-mouse Rab7 antibodies (Santa Cruz), phycoerythrin-conjugated rat anti-mouse LAMP-1 MAb (Santa Cruz), and biotin-conjugated rat anti-mouse CD68 (macrosialin) MAb (Serotec, Oxford, United Kingdom). Isotype-matched control antibodies were purchased from BD Pharmingen and DakoCytomation (Glostrup, Denmark). After treatment with the primary antibodies, the cells were washed three times with PBS containing Ca2+ and Mg2+ and were stained with the secondary reagents streptavidin-Alexa Fluor 546 (Molecular Probes) or rhodamine-conjugated goat anti-rat or goat anti-rabbit antibody (Dianova, Hamburg, Germany) in saponin-containing blocking solution for 45 min at room temperature. Cells were mounted in fluorescent mounting medium (DakoCytomation) before observation with a LSM 510 Zeiss confocal laser scanning microscope. Confocal microscopy images were acquired by use of LSM 510 software and analyzed by use of LSM 3.2 image browser before being exported to Adobe PhotoShop. For each experiment and at each time point, the percentages of parasite-containing compartments displaying endocytic marker molecules or having fused with lysosomes were determined after 50 to 300 PV were counted.
Extracellular staining of DC. In freshly prepared BMDC populations, DC were identified by labeling with MAb HL3, a hamster IgG1 directed against mouse CD11c (BD Pharmingen) and cytochrome5-conjugated goat anti-hamster IgG (Dianova) before permeabilization for intracellular staining.
Statistical analysis. Unpaired Student's t test was used for statistical analyses. Differences were considered significant when P was <0.05.
|
|
|---|
After infection of DC with L. major promastigotes, all parasites were located in membrane-bound compartments. The outline of the phagosome membrane was largely congruent with the shape of the parasites. Late endosomal/lysosomal molecules could be detected in the majority of PV membranes of both DC precursors and immature DC (Fig. 1). Distinct red rims indicated the presence of CD68 (Fig. 1A, 1 to 5, and Fig. 1B, 1 to 4) and LAMP-1 (Fig. 1A, 6 to 9, and Fig. 1B, 5 to 8) in the membranes of L. major-containing organelles in FSDC and BMDC. For examination of the PV biogenesis, BMDC and FSDC were evaluated at 0.5, 1, 4, or 24 h after infection with L. major. The results of the immunofluorescence analysis showed that the early endosomal marker CD71 was detectable in few PV (about 10%) only within 30 min (BMDC) or 4 h (FSDC) after infection (Fig. 2). At 24 h, virtually none of the PV in BMDC (<1%) and less than 3% of the PV in FSDC contained this early marker. In contrast, the majority of PV in both FSDC and BMDC expressed LAMP-1 and LAMP-2 proteins already in the early phase of infection. Thus, PV maturation in L. major-infected DC seems to occur very fast. The rapid formation of late endosomal compartments was most pronounced in BMDC, as indicated by the early expression of high levels of LAMP-1, LAMP-2, and CD68 (Fig. 2A), while lower amounts of these markers were detected in FSDC (Fig. 2B). On the other hand, a higher proportion of PV in FSDC was positive for Rab7, another late endosomal molecule, which is involved in the fusion of late endosomes with lysosomes (5, 22). Of note, the immortalized line FSDC has been shown to display the morphology and surface marker profile suggestive of a myeloid progenitor cell with features of both DC and macrophages (12).
![]() View larger version (49K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Analysis of late endosomal/lysosomal proteins in phagosomes containing L. major promastigotes. BMDC (A) or FSDC (B) were treated with CMFDA-labeled parasites (green staining) for 30 min and, 24 h later, the cells were fixed, permeabilized, and stained for CD68 or LAMP-1 (red staining). Freshly prepared DC were identified by the expression of CD11c (blue staining). The optical sections (0.5- to 0.8-µm thickness) obtained by confocal fluorescence microscopy illustrate the association of PV in immature BMDC with CD68 (A, 1 to 5) and LAMP-1 (A, 6 to 9) and of PV in FSDC with CD68 (B, 1 to 4) and LAMP-1 (B, 5 to 8). Colocalizations of CD68 or LAMP-1 with the PV are indicated by arrows. Panels A4, A8, B3, and B7 are differential interference contrast images. Panels A5, A9, B4, and B8 represent the superimposition of the fluorescence images.
|
![]() View larger version (41K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Biogenesis of PV in immature BMDC (A) and FSDC (B) infected with CMFDA- or CMTMR-labeled L. major promastigotes. At 0.5, 1, 4, or 24 h after pulse infection, the cells were fixed, permeabilized, and stained with antibodies and appropriate secondary reagents to examine the association of CD71, CD68, Rab7, LAMP-1, or LAMP-2 with L. major-containing PV by confocal fluorescence microscopy. Freshly prepared BMDC were identified by CD11c labeling. For each time point and each molecule, the percentages of parasite-containing compartments that colocalized with endosomal/lysosomal proteins were determined after 50 to 300 PV were counted. The data are mean values ± standard errors of the means for two to six independent experiments.
|
High levels of the late endosomal markers CD68, LAMP-1, and LAMP-2 were present in the parasite-containing organelles of both immature and mature DC (Fig. 3), even at the earliest time points after infection, indicating that the rapid formation of late endosomal compartments harboring L. major in DC is independent of the stage of DC maturation. The most notable difference between mature and immature BMDC was the rapid acquisition of Rab7 by L. major-containing PV in mature DC (Fig. 3B). While Rab7, a major effector of late endosome/lysosome transformation, could not be detected in PV of immature DC at any of the studied time points after infection (30 min to 4 h), 22% of the parasite-harboring compartments in mature DC displayed this molecule already at 30 min postinfection. At 1 h, the percentage of Rab7-positive PV had decreased considerably, and only background levels were detectable thereafter (Fig. 3B). The absence of Rab7 in immature BMDC suggests an arrest of their PV biogenesis at the stage of late endosomes.
![]() View larger version (30K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Biogenesis of PV in immature BMDC (A) and mature BMDC (B) infected with CMFDA- or CMTMR-labeled L. major promastigotes. At 0.5, 1, 2, or 4 h after pulse infection, the cells were fixed, permeabilized, and stained with antibodies and appropriate secondary reagents to examine the association of CD68, LAMP-1, LAMP-2, CD71, Rab7, or Rab4 with L. major-containing PV by confocal fluorescence microscopy. DC were identified by CD11c labeling. For each time point and each molecule, the percentages of parasite-containing compartments that colocalized with endosomal/lysosomal proteins were determined after 100 to 200 PV were counted. The data are mean values ± standard deviations for two independent experiments.
|
The fusion activity of L. major-containing PV with lysosomes is strongly reduced in immature DC. The finding that Rab7, a key molecule controlling the formation of phagolysosomes, is not present in PV of immature BMDC and can be detected only during the initial phase of infection in PV of mature BMDC (see above) (Fig. 3) suggested that L. major modulates the fusogenic activity of phagosomes in DC. To test this assumption, BMDC at different stages of maturation were infected with CMFDA-labeled L. major promastigotes, and the lysosomes were stained with LysoTracker dye. Subsequently, the fusion activity of the PV with lysosomes was analyzed by confocal microscopy at 24 h after infection. L. major-harboring PV from immature BMDC rarely fused with lysosomes (Fig. 4, panels A and B1); only about 5% of the lysosomal compartments in BMDC that had been cultured for 6 days colocalized with promastigotes. During further DC maturation, the percentage of fusion events increased and reached a level of about 18% (Fig. 4, panels A and B2 to B5). The poor fusion activity of promastigote-containing organelles with lysosomes in immature DC cannot be explained by a delay in PV maturation, because fusion events were almost absent even after 2 and 3 days of infection (data not shown).
![]() View larger version (29K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Fusion properties of L. major-containing PV in BMDC at different maturation stages. BMDC that had been cultured for 6, 8, or 10 days were exposed to CMFDA-labeled L. major promastigotes for 30 min. Subsequently, LysoTracker dye was added to stain the lysosomes. After 24 h, the cells were fixed and analyzed for lysosomes colocalizing with parasites by confocal fluorescence microscopy. DC were identified by CD11c labeling (blue). (A) For each BMDC population, the percentage of parasite-containing lysosomal compartments (fusion events) was determined after 50 to 200 organelles were counted. Data are the mean values ± standard deviations for two independent experiments. Panel B1, L. major-containing PV (green staining) in immature BMDC (cultured for 6 days) not colocalizing with lysosomes (red staining). Panels B2 to B5, L. major-containing PV (green staining) in mature BMDC (cultured for 10 days) that colocalizes with a lysosomal compartment (arrows). Panel B3 is a differential interference contrast image; panel B5 represents the superimposition of the fluorescence images shown in panels B2 and B4. Yellow color indicates colocalization. Optical sections (1-µm thickness) are shown.
|
Only live promastigotes, not heat-killed promastigotes or amastigotes, cause a block of fusion between PV and lysosomes in DC. To evaluate whether the incompetence of L. major-harboring PV to fuse with lysosomes depends on parasite viability or life cycle stage, immature BMDC or FSDC were exposed to live promastigotes, heat-killed promastigotes, or live amastigotes. In contrast to PV containing live promastigotes, a large proportion of PV containing heat-killed promastigotes (about 70%) colocalized with lysosomes in both BMDC and FSDC (Fig. 5). Moreover, the fusogenic activity of PV containing amastigotes was much higher than that of PV containing live promastigotes (34% compared to 10% in freshly prepared DC). The percentage of fusion events was higher (20%) in the DC progenitor line, FSDC, that had been exposed to live promastigotes, a finding that correlated with the higher level of Rab7 in the PV of these cells (see above) (Fig. 2). These observations suggest that after internalization of live promastigotes, the maturation of PV in DC is strongly reduced and the vast majority of PV is arrested at the stage of late endosomes. In contrast, a considerable proportion of PV containing amastigotes fuse with lysosomes.
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Fusion activities of L. major-containing PV in DC that had been exposed to live or heat-killed promastigotes or live amastigotes of L. major. Lysosomal compartments in immature BMDC (cultured for 8 days) or FSDC were labeled by loading with rhodamine-coupled dextran before incubation of the cells with CMFDA-stained parasites for 30 min. After 24 h, the cells were fixed and analyzed for lysosomes colocalizing with PV by confocal fluorescence microscopy. Freshly prepared BMDC were identified by CD11c labeling. For each experimental group, the percentage of lysosomal compartments colocalizing with PV (fusion events) was determined after 100 organelles were counted. The results are representative of three or four independent experiments.
|
|
|
|---|
Both macrophages and DC serve as host cells for Leishmania sp. parasites, but the two cell types differ in important ways. DC have unique surveillance and migratory properties, enabling them to carry parasite antigens captured in the infected skin to the draining lymph nodes for presentation to naïve T cells, thus initiating the specific immune response (23, 24). A critical specialization of DC is the process of maturation (2). Immature DC efficiently take up antigen but express relatively low levels of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) and costimulatory molecules on their surface and, thus, have a reduced capacity for T-cell stimulation. In contrast, mature DC downregulate their endocytic activity, while the transport of immunogenic peptide-MHC class II complexes from the lysosomal compartment to the plasma membrane, together with increased surface expression of costimulatory molecules, enables them to activate even resting T cells (6, 16, 30). Using L. major-infected Langerhans cells, DC derived from the skin, we previously demonstrated that the MHC class II levels associated with L. major-containing PV decrease with DC maturation (11). We also showed that immunogenic peptide-MHC class II complexes in L. major-infected DC are remarkably long-lived (11), supporting the concept that DC are highly specialized for the prolonged retention and efficient presentation of parasite antigen in leishmaniasis.
In the present study, we analyzed the biogenesis of PV housing L. major, as characterized by the acquisition of endosomal and lysosomal marker proteins, and the fusion activity of the L. major-containing PV with lysosomes in DC at different maturation stages. The determination of the kinetics of endosome/lysosome marker recruitment into the PV revealed that L. major-containing phagosomes in all types of DC tested, a DC precursor line as well as freshly prepared immature and mature DC, can fuse with late endocytic compartments very quickly after their formation, as hallmarked by the rapid acquisition of high levels of LAMP-1, LAMP-2, and CD68 (Fig. 2 and 3). On the other hand, none or only very small amounts of the PV were found to display the early endosomal molecules CD71 and Rab4, indicating low or very transient interactions with early endocytic organelles just upon parasite uptake. Interestingly, very similar patterns of endosomal/lysosomal marker expression were observed with DC that, in addition to culture in the presence of GM-CSF, were treated with the stimuli LPS, CpG ODN, or CD40 ligand. This finding supports the view that activation of DC, although greatly enhancing their T-cell-stimulatory capacity via induction of IL-12 expression (17, 21), does not influence the biogenesis of L. major-containing phagosomes.
A most important feature was the developmental regulation of Rab7 expression in L. major-containing phagosomes of DC. This protein, which controls the fusion of late endosomes with lysosomes, was virtually absent in PV of immature DC, but significant amounts were detected in those of DC precursors and mature DC. It is noteworthy that the maximal levels of Rab7 expression in DC were consistently lower than those reported for macrophages (7). An analysis of the fusion activity of L. major-containing PV with lysosomes demonstrated that the fusogenic property was strongly impaired in freshly prepared immature DC infected with promastigotes, while it increased steadily during DC maturation (Fig. 4). Interestingly, the decreased fusion activity of PV with lysosomes in immature DC correlated with enhanced parasite survival in these cells. Thus, L. major promastigotes reduce lysosomal degradation in immature DC. In vivo, DC in the periphery, such as skin, generally exhibit an immature phenotype. The observation that PV of immature DC, relative to those of mature DC, fuse poorly with lysosomes provides an explanation for how immature DC, while migrating from the infected skin to the draining lymph node and undergoing the maturation process, can preserve parasite antigen for the generation of peptide-MHC complexes and efficient presentation to T cells.
The results of the present study also show that the inhibition of PV-lysosome fusion in L. major-infected DC is dependent upon the viability and life cycle stage of the parasite. Live promastigotes blocked the phagolysosome generation in immature BMDC almost completely (Fig. 4 and 5), whereas phagosomes containing killed organisms showed extensive fusion with lysosomes. Furthermore, the low level of Rab7 expression in the L. major-containing PV of DC was a specific effect of live parasites. While Rab7 could not be detected in PV of immature DC and was present in 22% of the PV in mature DC treated with live promastigotes, a large proportion of PV in immature DC (53%) and mature DC (63%) that had been exposed to heat-killed parasites expressed Rab7 (Fig. 3 and data not shown). L. major amastigotes induced a considerably higher level of fusion activity than promastigotes. These findings are reminiscent of the situation with macrophages, for which it has been demonstrated that promastigotes, unlike amastigotes, are located in phagosomes that poorly fuse with late endocytic/lysosomal compartments. This phenomenon could be linked to the stage-specific expression of lipophosphoglycan, the predominant surface glycoconjugate of promastigotes (8, 9, 19). The promastigote-containing phagosomes with low fusogenic activity were shown to display an impaired recruitment of Rab7 (29). Again, the latter finding with infected macrophages is analogous to our observation with DC and suggests that, in both types of host cells, the fusion restriction allows the differentiation of promastigotes into amastigotes which are more adapted to the lysosomal compartment. However, an important characteristic of the inhibition of phagosome-lysosome fusion in DC is its regulation according to the stage of DC maturation.
In conclusion, the findings of the present study extend our understanding of the interaction of DC with Leishmania sp. and the mechanisms underlying the unique ability of DC to initiate the parasite-specific T-cell response so efficiently. Our data are consistent with the concept that immature DC in the skin, upon ingestion of the promastigote form deposited by the sand fly vector, can sequester antigen by reducing lysosomal degradation until the maturing cells have migrated to the draining lymph node. When reaching the lymph node, lysosomal proteolysis in mature DC mobilizes the formation of immunogenic peptides to be loaded onto MHC class II molecules and presented to resting T cells. Immature DC that remain in the skin and mature in response to local inflammatory signals may also present antigenic peptides derived from killed promastigotes or amastigotes that are released by macrophages, thus contributing to the instruction of the local immune response.
We thank Christine Hambrecht for technical assistance and Hilde Merkert for help with confocal microscopy.
U.K. and V.F. contributed equally as first authors of this work. ![]()
Present address: Micromet AG, Staffelseestrasse 2, D-81477 München, Germany. ![]()
|
|
|---|
in combination with interferon-
, but not with interleukin 4, activates murine macrophages for elimination of Leishmania major amastigotes. Eur. J. Immunol. 20:1131-1135.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»