Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, March 2006, p. 1933-1940, Vol. 74, No. 3
0019-9567/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/IAI.74.3.1933-1940.2006
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Barbara A. Bensing,1,2
Akraporn Prakobphol,3
Susan J. Fisher,3,4 and
Paul M. Sullam1,2*
Division of Infectious Diseases, Veterans Affairs Medical Center,1 Department of Medicine,2 Department of Cell and Tissue Biology,3 Departments of Anatomy, Pharmaceutical Chemistry, and Obstetric, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California4
Received 21 November 2005/ Returned for modification 9 December 2005/ Accepted 19 December 2005
|
|
|---|
. Since this species is an important member of the oral flora, we examined the direct binding of these adhesins to human salivary proteins. Both GspB and Hsa bound low-molecular-weight salivary mucin MG2 and salivary agglutinin. Hsa also bound several other salivary proteins, including secretory immunoglobulin A. Screening of six oral streptococcal isolates revealed that at least two of the strains expressed GspB homologues. These results indicate that GspB-like adhesins may be important for oral bacterial colonization. |
|
|---|
S. gordonii is also a leading cause of infective endocarditis. The binding of this organism to human platelets is thought to be a major virulence determinant in the pathogenesis of this disease. Platelet binding by S. gordonii strains M99 and Challis is predominantly facilitated by the expression of the homologous serine-rich surface glycoproteins GspB and Hsa, respectively, that mediate bacterial binding to sialylated carbohydrate moieties on platelet membrane glycoprotein Ib
(GPIb
) (2, 5, 30, 37). Both GspB and Hsa consist of an N-terminal signal peptide, a short serine-rich region (SRR1), a region that is rich in basic amino acid residues (BR), a longer serine-rich region (SRR2), and a C-terminal cell wall-anchoring domain (Fig. 1) (5, 28). Recently, the BRs of GspB and Hsa have been shown to comprise the binding domains of these lectin-like adhesins (31). However, the binding specificities of these regions are somewhat different. The BR of Hsa can bind both
(2-3) sialyllactosamine [NeuAc
(2-3)Galß(1-4)GlcNAc] and sialyl-T antigen (sT antigen) [NeuAc
(2-3)Galß(1-3)GalNAc], whereas the BR of GspB binds only the sT antigen structure on GPIb
(31).
![]() View larger version (11K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Structures of GspB of S. gordonii strain M99 and Hsa of S. gordonii strain Challis and diagrams of GST fusion proteins. The number of amino acids (aa) in GspB and Hsa is indicated in parentheses. GST, glutathione S-transferase; SP, signal peptide; SRR1, first serine-rich region; BR, basic region; SRR2, second serine-rich region; CWAD, cell wall-anchoring domain.
|
Samples of submandibular-sublingual, parotid, and whole human saliva were collected as described previously (20, 21). After the samples were heated at 70°C for 10 min in sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) sample buffer, proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE through 3 to 8% Tris-acetate gels (Invitrogen) under reducing conditions. The proteins were stained with silver or transferred to BioTrace NT nitrocellulose membranes (Pall Corporation). Membranes were incubated for 16 h at 4°C in a suspension of 1x blocking reagent (Roche) in Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS; Sigma) and then incubated with 0.1 µM solution of purified glutathione S-transferase (GST) or GST fused to the BR of GspB or Hsa (GST-GspBBR or GST-HsaBR [Fig. 1]) (31, 33). GST or fusion protein binding was detected using anti-GST serum (Molecular Probes) and horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (Sigma) as described previously (31).
To identify salivary proteins, replicate membranes containing the same saliva samples were also incubated for 16 h at 4°C in a suspension of 1x blocking reagent and then incubated with HECA-452, anti-sialyl Lewisx (sLex), antilactoferrin, anti-
-amylase, or anti-human IgA antibodies (Table 1) for 1 h at room temperature. Antibody binding was detected by incubating the membranes for 1 h with HRP-conjugated anti-rat IgM (for HECA-452; Jackson Immuno Research Laboratories, West Grove, PA), HRP-conjugated anti-mouse IgM (for anti-sLex monoclonal antibody; Jackson Immuno Research Laboratories), HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (for antilactoferrin and anti-
-amylase antibodies; Sigma), or HRP-conjugated anti-goat IgG (for anti-human IgA antibody; Sigma) antibodies, followed by development with the Super Signal chemiluminescence detection system (Pierce). For lectin blotting, the membranes were incubated for 16 h at 4°C in lectin blocking buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 0.15 M NaCl, 0.05% [vol/vol] Tween 20), followed by incubation with 0.2 µg/ml of biotinylated Lens culinaris agglutinin or 2 µg/ml of biotinylated Maackia amurensis lectin II (MAL-II) (Table 1) for 1 h at room temperature. Lectin binding was detected by incubating the membranes with 0.1 µg/ml of HRP-conjugated streptavidin (Pierce) and then developing the blots with the Super Signal chemiluminescence detection system as described above.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Binding specificities of antibodies and lectins used to identify salivary proteins
|
-amylase, and sIgA heavy chain were identified in the saliva samples on the basis of their characteristic electrophoretic behavior, reported molecular weight, and reactivity with the above antibodies and lectins (1, 6, 14, 18) as indicated in Fig. 2 (panels B to H, marked by circles a to g). MG1 and MG2, which are known to be found in different glycoforms (22, 36), were detected as doublets by using HECA-452, anti-sLex, and MAL-II (Fig. 2B, C, and H, circles a and c).
![]() View larger version (40K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Binding of fusion proteins to human salivary proteins. Salivary proteins were separated by electrophoresis through 3 to 8% polyacrylamide gradient gels and then stained with silver (A) or subjected to Western blotting (B-F), lectin blotting (G, H), or far-Western blotting (I-K). Each lane contains 5 µl (for silver staining, antilactoferrin antibody, anti- -amylase antibody, MAL-II, GST, GST-GspBBR, and GST-HsaBR), 3 µl (for anti-sLex monoclonal antibody), 2 µl (for anti-human IgA antibody), 0.5 µl (for HECA-452), or 0.1 µl (for Lens culinaris agglutinin) of the saliva samples. WS, whole saliva; SMSL, submandibular and sublingual saliva; PG-R, parotid saliva from the right duct. Salivary proteins identified the following proteins: high-molecular-weight mucin MG1 (MUC5B) (a), salivary agglutinin (gp340) (b), low-molecular-weight mucin MG2 (MUC7) (c), proline-rich glycoprotein (d), lactoferrin (e), -amylase (f), and sIgA heavy chain (g). LCA, Lens culinaris agglutinin.
|
) chain, since the protein was detected only in whole saliva and had the same electrophoretic mobility as the protein detected by Western blotting with the anti-sIgA
chain antibody (approximately 55 kDa; Fig. 2F and K).
The BRs of GspB and Hsa have been shown to bind platelet GPIb
in a sialic acid-dependent manner (31). MG2, salivary agglutinin, and sIgA also have sialylated carbohydrates (15, 16, 20, 24), suggesting that these moieties may be bound by GspB and Hsa. To address this possibility, replicate membrane blots of the saliva samples were incubated at 37°C for 16 h in DPBS in the presence or absence of sialidase A (0.5 U/ml; Prozyme) and then probed with the fusion proteins. As shown in Fig. 3, sialidase A treatment of the membranes markedly reduced the binding of GST-GspBBR and GST-HsaBR to salivary proteins, including MG2 and salivary agglutinin, suggesting that the interaction of the fusion proteins with salivary components was indeed dependent on sialic acid.
![]() View larger version (66K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Effect of sialidase A treatment on fusion protein binding to human salivary proteins. Salivary proteins were separated by electrophoresis through 3 to 8% polyacrylamide gradient gels and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes were incubated in DPBS in the absence (A to C) or presence (D to F) of sialidase A and then probed with GST (A, D), GST-GspBBR (B, E), or GST-HsaBR (C, F). Each lane contains 5 µl saliva. WS, whole saliva; SMSL, submandibular and sublingual saliva; PG-R, parotid saliva from the right duct.
|
are the preferred structures for binding by the BR of GspB. The BR of Hsa recognizes not only sT antigen but also
(2-3) sialyllactosamine on GPIb
(31). In a previous study, MG2 was shown to contain terminal sT antigen, sLex {NeuAc
(2-3)Galß(1-4)[Fuc
(1-3)]GlcNAc}, and sialyllactosamine structures, as well as other nonsialylated oligosaccharide moieties (20). Sialyl Lewisa (sLea) {NeuAc
(2-3)Galß(1-3)[Fuc
(1-4)]GlcNAc} is also present on MG2 in saliva from Lewisa-positive individuals (18). To investigate whether the BRs of GspB and Hsa recognize the sLex and sLea structures as target carbohydrates, the binding of the fusion proteins to carbohydrate-conjugated polyacrylamides (PAAs) was examined by dot blot analysis.
Nitrocellulose membranes were spotted with 1 µg of lactosamine [Galß(1-4)GlcNAc]-,
(2-3) sialyllactosamine-, T-antigen [Galß(1-3)GalNAc]-, sT antigen-, sLex-, and sLea-conjugated PAA (GlycoTech). The membranes were incubated for 16 h in 1x blocking reagent in DPBS at 4°C. The abilities of GST, GST-GspBBR, or GST-HsaBR to bind the spotted synthesized carbohydrates were examined as described previously (31).
As shown in Fig. 4A, GST alone did not bind any of the synthetic carbohydrates. As expected (31), GST-GspBBR bound sT antigen, but not
(2-3) sialyllactosamine (Fig. 4B). GST-HsaBR bound both sT antigen and
(2-3) sialyllactosamine (Fig. 4C) as described previously (31). Neither GST-GspBBR nor GST-HsaBR bound T antigen, lactosamine, or sLex. However, weak reactivity of GST-HsaBR with sLea was observed (Fig. 4C). Since sLex corresponds to
(2-3) sialyllactosamine with fucose linked
(1-3) to the GlcNAc residue, these results suggest that the fucose residue in sLex inhibits the binding of the BR of Hsa to
(2-3) sialyllactosamine. The combined results indicate that the BRs of both GspB and Hsa can directly bind salivary proteins and that this binding occurs via specific sialylated carbohydrates. However, the subsets of salivary components recognized by the binding domains appear to be different for the two proteins.
![]() View larger version (55K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Binding of GST fusion proteins to different oligosaccharide structures. One microgram of each oligosaccharide-conjugated polyacrylamide was spotted onto three separate nitrocellulose membranes. Each membrane was incubated with GST (A), GST-GspBBR (B), or GST-HsaBR (C) followed by anti-GST serum and peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG. NeuAc, N-acetylneuraminic acid; Gal, galactose; GalNAc, N-acetylgalactosamine; GlcNAc, N-acetylglucosamine; Fuc, fucose; PAA, polyacrylamide.
|
(2-3) to Gal, including sialyllactosamine and sT antigen (35). However, as shown in Fig. 2, neither GST-GspBBR nor GST-HsaBR bound MG1. MG1 oligosaccharides are much more complex and are substantially longer than those of MG2 (35). The failure of the fusion proteins to bind MG1 may therefore be due to steric hindrance of the binding sites for GspB and Hsa by the large complex oligosaccharide structures. Previously, Murray et al. examined the binding of oral streptococci to salivary proteins and found that 6 of the 16 strains tested (Streptococcus sanguinis strains 10556 and 804, Streptococcus oralis strains 10557 and 72-41, and S. gordonii strains 72-40 and G9B [Table 2 ]) bound MG2 as well as other salivary components (14). At least one of the strains (S. gordonii strain 72-40) bound MG2 in a sialic acid-dependent manner (14). In a separate study, Ruhl et al. showed that S. sanguinis 10556 could bind MG2, but not asialo-MG2 (25). These findings suggested that binding of these strains to sialic acid residues on MG2 might be mediated by GspB homologues.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Strains and plasmids used in this study
|
In control studies, probe gspBBR hybridized with a single DNA fragment from strain M99, but not with DNA fragments from strain Challis. Similarly, probe hsaBR hybridized with a single DNA fragment from Challis, but not DNA fragments from M99 (Fig. 5A and B, lanes 1 and 2). When the blotted membrane was incubated with probe gspBBR, a single DNA fragment was detected in S. gordonii 72-40 and S. gordonii G9B, but not in the other strains (Fig. 5A, lanes 3 to 8). In contrast, probe hsaBR did not react with DNA fragments from any of the oral streptococcal strains (Fig. 5B, lanes 3 to 8). These results suggest that strains 72-40 and G9B possess genes that are highly similar to gspB.
![]() View larger version (27K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Detection of gspB homologues in six strains of oral streptococci by Southern hybridization. Genomic DNAs from M99, Challis, SK36, and the six oral streptococcal isolates were digested with HindIII, separated by agarose gel electrophoresis, transferred to nylon membranes, and hybridized with digoxigenin-labeled probes for gspB (A), hsa (B), or srpA (C).
|
To confirm the presence of gspB homologues in the genomic DNAs of S. gordonii 72-40 and G9B, we designed a series of primers corresponding to the sequences of the SRR1 and SRR2 coding regions of GspB and Hsa and attempted to amplify the BR coding region of the gspB homologues of the two strains. PCR amplification using primer pair IR2 (5'-TCTGAGTCTCTTTCAGTGTC-3')-IR3 (5'-GCTTGCAGAGACTGAGGCGC-3') yielded a single DNA fragment from the genomic DNAs of strains 72-40 and G9B (data not shown). The fragments were cloned into pCR2.1-TOPO (Table 2) for sequence determination. The nucleotide sequences of the amplified fragments from both S. gordonii 72-40 and G9B showed strong similarities to the BR coding region of GspB, and the amino acid sequences deduced from the nucleotide sequences showed 99.2% and 94.8% identity to that of GspB, respectively. These results confirm that S. gordonii strains 72-40 and G9B possess gspB homologues.
To examine whether the six oral streptococcal strains express GspB homologues on the cell surface, cell wall-associated proteins were extracted from these strains as described previously (32), except that bacterial cells were treated with both mutanolysin (500 U/ml) and lysozyme (50 mg/ml). The cell wall-associated proteins were then analyzed by Western blotting with an anti-GspB polyclonal serum, which was raised against native, glycosylated GspB (5).
As expected, the anti-GspB serum reacted with GspB and Hsa extracted from the cell surfaces of S. gordonii M99 and PS798 (secA2-complemented Challis) (Fig. 6, lanes 1 and 2). The proteins migrated on SDS-polyacrylamide gels with an extremely high and heterogeneous apparent molecular mass as described previously (2, 34). The serum also detected high-molecular-weight proteins in the cell wall proteins of S. gordonii 72-40 and G9B, indicating that these strains express the GspB homologues on the cell surface. It is noteworthy that, although neither probe gspBBR nor probe hsaBR hybridized with any DNA fragments from S. sanguinis 10556 by Southern hybridization analysis, the anti-GspB serum reacted weakly with a high-molecular-weight protein in the cell wall proteins of the strain (Fig. 6, lane 3). This suggests that S. sanguinis 10556 expresses a GspB homologue that has only limited similarity to GspB and Hsa.
![]() View larger version (76K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Surface expression of GspB homologues in the six oral strains of viridans group of streptococci. Cell wall proteins were separated by electrophoresis through a 3 to 8% polyacrylamide gradient gel and then analyzed by Western blotting using a polyclonal anti-GspB serum. All proteins shown in this figure migrated above the largest standard (250 kDa). Each lane contains cell wall proteins extracted from bacteria in 200 µl of a broth culture. PS798, secA2-complemented Challis.
|
![]() View larger version (12K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Binding of the six oral streptococcal strains to sialic acid moieties. Microtiter wells were coated with fetuin or asialofetuin (50 µg/well). Binding of washed bacteria to the immobilized glycoproteins was assessed as described previously (2), except that the bound bacteria were detected by staining with crystal violet, dissolving the stain in 5% acetic acid, and then reading the absorbance at 570 nm. Binding is expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (error bar) (n = 6).
|
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. Western blot analysis of expression of the GspB homologue by S. gordonii 72-40 (lane 1) and the mutant strain PS1070 (lane 2). (Top) Cell wall proteins were separated by electrophoresis through a 3 to 8% polyacrylamide gradient gel, transferred to nitrocellulose, and then probed with the anti-GspB serum. (Bottom) Proteins were precipitated from the spent culture medium using trichloroacetic acid, separated by electrophoresis on a 3 to 8% polyacrylamide gradient gel, transferred to nitrocellulose, and then probed with an anti-FLAG monoclonal antibody (Sigma).
|
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers. The nucleotide sequences of the BR coding regions of GspB homologues of S. gordonii strains 72-40 and G9B determined in this study have been deposited in the DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank database under accession numbers AB218771 and AB218772, respectively.
We thank Ian Siboo, Julie Higashi, and Jennifer Mitchell for their helpful scientific and editorial suggestions.
Present address: Molecular Bacteriology Section, Department of Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Animal Health, 3-1-5 Kannondai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0856, Japan. ![]()
|
|
|---|
. Infect. Immun. 72:6528-6537.
2, 3Galß1, 3GalNAc sequence. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 106:390-396.[CrossRef][Medline]
. Mol. Microbiol. 58:380-392.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»