Previous Article | Next Article 
Infection and Immunity, April 2006, p. 2473-2476, Vol. 74, No. 4
0019-9567/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/IAI.74.4.2473-2476.2006
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Adaptive Immunity-Dependent Intestinal Hypermotility Contributes to Host Defense against Giardia spp.
Yolanda S. Andersen,1
Frances D. Gillin,2 and
Lars Eckmann1*
Department of Medicine,1
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pathology, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 920932
Received 21 September 2005/
Returned for modification 26 October 2005/
Accepted 18 January 2006

ABSTRACT
Humans infected with
Giardia exhibit intestinal hypermotility,
but the underlying mechanisms and functional significance are
uncertain. Here we show in murine models of giardiasis that
small-intestinal hypermotility occurs in a delayed fashion relative
to peak parasite burden, is dependent on adaptive immune defenses,
and contributes to giardial clearance.

TEXT
Infection with
Giardia lamblia is one of the most common causes
of diarrheal disease worldwide (
22). This protozoan pathogen
colonizes the small intestine and can attach to the epithelium
but does not invade the mucosa. Infections are normally self-limiting,
since immunocompetent hosts can control and typically eradicate
G. lamblia, a process that involves CD4 T cells and the generation
of secretory immunoglobulin A (IgA) and other, poorly understood
effectors (
6,
8,
9,
18). Despite the frequently severe clinical
symptoms, diarrhea, abdominal pain, malabsorption, and weight
loss, infection is not accompanied by significant mucosal inflammation
(
12). These observations suggest that inflammatory mediators
may not be important for parasite-induced diarrhea, although
the mechanisms governing diarrhea in giardiasis are poorly understood.
Giardia has not been shown to release enterotoxins that might
account for the disturbance of intestinal fluid absorption or
secretion. A reduction in absorptive surface due to a loss of
epithelial microvilli occurs upon
Giardia infection in mice
(
16), which could lead to osmotically driven diarrhea associated
with malabsorption, but the absolute surface reduction is modest
compared to the predicted anatomical reserve of the small intestine.
Humans infected with
G. lamblia exhibit signs of intestinal
hypermotility upon radiological examination (
15), a phenomenon
also observed in experimentally infected Mongolian gerbils (
5).
The underlying mechanisms and functional significance of these
findings are presently unclear. Therefore, the goal of the present
study was to test the hypothesis that intestinal hypermotility
represents a host defense mechanism against
Giardia, using murine
models of giardiasis.
Adult C57BL/6, SCID, and neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS)-deficient mice were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). For infections with Giardia muris, cysts were purified by sucrose flotation, counted in a hemocytometer under a phase-contrast microscope, and given by oral gavage in water at 104 cysts/mouse in 0.2 ml (9). For G. lamblia infections, trophozoites of the GS/M strain (ATCC 50580) (11) were grown in TYIS-33 medium and given by oral gavage at 107/mouse in 0.2 ml of the same medium (9). Small-intestinal motility was determined by a modified test meal method. Mice were fasted overnight and given 0.2 ml of a suspension of 106 fluorescent polystyrene beads (10-µm-diameter Fluoresbrite YG carboxylate microspheres; Polysciences, Inc., Warrington, PA) (19) and 6% carmine dye in 5% gum arabic in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). After 20 min, the small intestine was removed rapidly, and the position of the carmine dye front and the entire length of the small intestine were recorded. The intestine was then divided into eight equal-sized pieces, each of which was opened longitudinally, placed into 2 ml PBS, and cooled on ice for 10 min. The mixtures were shaken vigorously to detach the trophozoites and beads, which were then counted separately by using phase-contrast and fluorescence microscopes, respectively. The distance traveled by the carmine dye front was expressed as a percentage of the entire length of the small intestine. Bead numbers per segment were expressed as a percentage of the total number of beads in the small intestine. To assess the consequences of inhibiting small-intestinal motility on giardial clearance, mice were first infected orally with G. muris or G. lamblia GS/M and treated by oral gavage every other day, beginning on day 7 or day 4, respectively, with 30 mg/kg loperamide or with PBS as a control. Small-intestinal trophozoite numbers were determined on day 21 for G. muris and on day 9 for G. lamblia.
To determine whether normal adult mice are a suitable model for studying the role of intestinal motility in controlling giardial infection, we infected 8- to 10-week-old C57BL/6 mice with cysts of the naturally occurring murine pathogen G. muris. Small-intestinal motility was determined by a test meal method, using carmine dye as a liquid phase marker (14) and 10-µm polystyrene beads as a marker of particulates comparable in size to Giardia trophozoites (19). Infection with G. muris accelerated small-intestinal transit, since the fronts of both carmine dye (Fig. 1A) and polystyrene beads (Fig. 1B) had traveled significantly farther in infected mice than in uninfected controls. A time course analysis of this phenomenon revealed that hypermotility occurred within a week after infection but peaked at 2 to 3 weeks, at a time when trophozoite numbers were decreased compared to the numbers at the time of maximal infection at 1 week (Fig. 1A). Thus, the maximal changes in small-intestinal motility were delayed relative to the peak in the trophozoite burden, suggesting that these changes may be caused by a mechanism other than direct giardial stimulation.
This finding is reminiscent of reports of
Giardia-induced loss
of intestinal epithelial microvilli in which the host adaptive
immune response was found to be responsible (
16,
17). To evaluate
whether similar mechanisms may be involved in causing small-intestinal
hypermotility, we evaluated mice with severe combined immunodeficiency
(SCID mice). These mice lack functional T and B cells due to
a defect in the catalytic subunit of DNA-dependent protein kinase,
PRKDC, which is required for normal V(D)J recombination, and
cannot eradicate
Giardia (
9,
18).
G. muris infection of SCID
mice did not alter small-intestinal transit, which contrasted
sharply with the observations in the immunocompetent controls
(Fig.
2). These results indicate that giardiasis-associated
small-intestinal hypermotility was dependent on the induction
of a normal adaptive immune response to the pathogen.
To test whether the observed small-intestinal hypermotility
contributed to the clearance of
Giardia, we treated mice with
loperamide, a drug that inhibits intestinal transit by activating
µ-opioid receptors in the gastrointestinal tract (
2,
13,
21). Drug treatment was started at the time of peak
G. muris infection (day 7) to ensure that pharmacologically induced changes
in motility would not interfere with the initial establishment
of the infection. The inhibition of small-intestinal motility
by loperamide markedly compromised giardial clearance, with
25-fold-higher trophozoite numbers in loperamide-treated mice
than in PBS-treated controls at 21 days (Fig.
3). Loperamide
treatment had no effect on the development of adaptive immunity,
since titers of antigiardial IgA in intestinal mucosal secretions
were not affected by the treatment (data not shown). Furthermore,
this experimental strategy revealed a similar inhibitory effect
on murine infection with
G. lamblia GS/M, a human giardial pathogen
that can infect normal adult mice (
3,
9). Mice treated with
PBS had largely cleared the infection by 9 days, while mice
treated with loperamide from day 4 onwards continued to have
significant numbers of
G. lamblia trophozoites in the small
intestine (Fig.
3). Thus, inhibition of small-intestinal motility
compromised the clearance of
Giardia in the murine host, irrespective
of the giardial species. As an additional approach to determine
the importance of intestinal motility in antigiardial host defense,
we used a genetic approach in which disruption of the gene for
nNOS interferes with effective propulsion in the intestine in
mice (
20). Motility analysis confirmed that nNOS-deficient mice
exhibited a constitutive delay in gastrointestinal transit compared
to their wild-type littermates (Fig.
4A). In parallel, the knockout
mice failed to clear
G. lamblia infection normally (Fig.
4B).
Thus, using pharmacologic and genetic approaches, we found that
decreased intestinal motility was associated with impairment
of host defense against
Giardia.
Our study shows that intestinal hypermotility is an important
host defense against
Giardia, a conclusion also reached in another
recent report (
10). This defense appears to depend on the development
of a normal adaptive immune response against the parasite, as
it did not occur in mice lacking T and B cells, although it
is possible, in principle, that T or B cells contribute to hypermotility
independent of their role in adaptive antigiardial immunity.
Immune-dependent hypermotility operates in host defense against
other enteric parasites, particularly helminths. For example,
eradication of the roundworm
Trichinella spiralis, which spends
a significant portion of its life cycle in the small intestine,
is highly correlated with enhanced intestinal motility (
4,
23).
Likewise, expulsion of the hookworm
Nippostrongylus brasiliensis in rats is accompanied by small-intestinal hypermotility, suggesting
a role in host defense against this helminth (
7). Common to
all these enteric pathogens is their primary, if not exclusive,
localization in the intestinal lumen. Viewed anatomically, this
site of infection is located outside the epithelium-lined body
proper and hence is not readily accessible to many immune effector
cells and molecules, such as neutrophils or complement, which
operate effectively within the body. In fact, effective antimicrobial
defense in the intestinal lumen poses a special challenge to
the host, which has a limited repertoire of defenses at this
site. Of these, secretory IgA is regarded commonly as a prime
luminal defense mechanism, but its actual importance in giardial
clearance appears to be variable and may depend on poorly defined
host and parasite factors (
6,
9,
18). Our data and prior work
with helminths (
4,
23) indicate that intestinal hypermotility
is another important defense mechanism against colonization
of the intestinal lumen.
Immune-dependent hypermotility may provide a mechanistic explanation for the diarrhea associated with giardiasis, as noted in prior reports (5, 15). In principle, diarrhea can be caused by decreased fluid absorption or increased secretion or a combination of these two mechanisms. Little evidence exists for enhanced ion and fluid secretion in giardiasis, leaving impaired fluid absorption as the likely cause. Shortened contact time with luminal fluids, which may be ingested or derived from gastric or pancreatic secretions, would be expected to compromise the effectiveness of ion transport across the epithelium, particularly when hypermotility is combined with the reported loss of absorptive epithelial surfaces (16). It must be noted, however, that mice do not exhibit frank diarrhea upon Giardia infection. Nonetheless, it is possible that an intestinal fluid imbalance occurs in both human and animal hosts and that it remains compensated in mice but not in humans. If hypermotility indeed contributes to the pathogenesis of diarrhea, our finding that SCID mice failed to exhibit Giardia-induced hypermotility would imply that patients with cellular immunodeficiencies associated with increased susceptibility to Giardia infections (e.g., chronic variable immunodeficiency) may be less likely to develop infection-associated diarrhea. Furthermore, our results suggest that caution is indicated when considering the use of intestinal motility inhibitors in the treatment of Giardia-induced diarrhea (1), as such treatment may prolong the underlying infection.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by NIH grants DK35108 and RR17030.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Medicine 0665, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0665. Phone: (858) 534-0683. Fax: (858) 822-6454. E-mail:
leckmann{at}ucsd.edu.

Editor: W. A. Petri, Jr.

REFERENCES
1 - Al-Abri, S. S., N. J. Beeching, and F. J. Nye. 2005. Traveller's diarrhoea. Lancet Infect. Dis. 5:349-360.[CrossRef][Medline]
2 - Awouters, F., A. Megens, M. Verlinden, J. Schuurkes, C. Niemegeers, and P. A. Janssen. 1993. Loperamide. Survey of studies on mechanism of its antidiarrheal activity. Dig. Dis. Sci. 38:977-995.[CrossRef][Medline]
3 - Byrd, L. G., J. T. Conrad, and T. E. Nash. 1994. Giardia lamblia infections in adult mice. Infect. Immun. 62:3583-3585.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4 - Castro, G. A., F. Badial-Aceves, J. W. Smith, S. J. Dudrick, and N. W. Weisbrodt. 1976. Altered small bowel propulsion associated with parasitism. Gastroenterology 71:620-625.[Medline]
5 - Deselliers, L. P., D. T. Tan, R. B. Scott, and M. E. Olson. 1997. Effects of Giardia lamblia infection on gastrointestinal transit and contractility in Mongolian gerbils. Dig. Dis. Sci. 42:2411-2419.[CrossRef][Medline]
6 - Eckmann, L. 2003. Mucosal defences against Giardia. Parasite Immunol. 25:259-270.[CrossRef][Medline]
7 - Farmer, S. G. 1981. Propulsive activity of the rat small intestine during infection with the nematode Nippostrongylus brasiliensis. Parasite Immunol. 3:227-234.[Medline]
8 - Faubert, G. 2000. Immune response to Giardia duodenalis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 13:35-54.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9 - Langford, T. D., M. P. Housley, M. Boes, J. Chen, M. F. Kagnoff, F. D. Gillin, and L. Eckmann. 2002. Central importance of immunoglobulin A in host defense against Giardia spp. Infect. Immun. 70:11-18.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10 - Li, E., P. Zhou, and S. M. Singer. 2006. Neuronal nitric oxide synthase is necessary for elimination of Giardia lamblia infections in mice. J. Immunol. 176:516-521.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11 - Nash, T. E., D. A. Herrington, G. A. Losonsky, and M. M. Levine. 1987. Experimental human infections with Giardia lamblia. J. Infect. Dis. 156:974-984.[Medline]
12 - Oberhuber, G., N. Kastner, and M. Stolte. 1997. Giardiasis: a histologic analysis of 567 cases. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 32:48-51.[Medline]
13 - Puig, M. M., and O. Pol. 1998. Peripheral effects of opioids in a model of chronic intestinal inflammation in mice. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 287:1068-1075.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14 - Read, N. W., C. A. Miles, D. Fisher, A. M. Holgate, N. D. Kime, M. A. Mitchell, A. M. Reeve, T. B. Roche, and M. Walker. 1980. Transit of a meal through the stomach, small intestine, and colon in normal subjects and its role in the pathogenesis of diarrhea. Gastroenterology 79:1276-1282.[Medline]
15 - Reeder, M. M. 1997. Radiological diagnosis of giardiasis. Semin. Roentgenol. 32:291-300.[CrossRef][Medline]
16 - Scott, K. G.-E., M. R. Logan, G. M. Klammer, D. A. Teoh, and A. G. Buret. 2000. Jejunal brush border microvillous alterations in Giardia muris-infected mice: role of T lymphocytes and interleukin-6. Infect. Immun. 68:3412-3418.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17 - Scott, K. G.-E., L. C. H. Yu, and A. G. Buret. 2004. Role of CD8+ and CD4+ T lymphocytes in jejunal mucosal injury during murine giardiasis. Infect. Immun. 72:3536-3542.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18 - Singer, S. M., and T. E. Nash. 2000. T-cell-dependent control of acute Giardia lamblia infections in mice. Infect. Immun. 68:170-175.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19 - Sukhdeo, M. V., and N. A. Croll. 1981. Gut propulsion in mice infected with Trichinella spiralis. J. Parasitol. 67:906-910.[CrossRef][Medline]
20 - Takahashi, T. 2003. Pathophysiological significance of neuronal nitric oxide synthase in the gastrointestinal tract. J. Gastroenterol. 38:421-430.[CrossRef][Medline]
21 - Tan-No, K., F. Niijima, O. Nakagawasai, T. Sato, S. Satoh, and T. Tadano. 2003. Development of tolerance to the inhibitory effect of loperamide on gastrointestinal transit in mice. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 20:357-363.[CrossRef][Medline]
22 - Thompson, R. C. 2000. Giardiasis as a re-emerging infectious disease and its zoonotic potential. Int. J. Parasitol. 30:1259-1267.[CrossRef][Medline]
23 - Vallance, B. A., and S. M. Collins. 1998. The effect of nematode infection upon intestinal smooth muscle function. Parasite Immunol. 20:249-253.[CrossRef][Medline]
Infection and Immunity, April 2006, p. 2473-2476, Vol. 74, No. 4
0019-9567/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/IAI.74.4.2473-2476.2006
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Cedillo-Rivera, R., Leal, Y. A., Yepez-Mulia, L., Gomez-Delgado, A., Ortega-Pierres, G., Tapia-Conyer, R., Munoz, O.
(2009). Seroepidemiology of Giardiasis in Mexico. Am J Trop Med Hyg
80: 6-10
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Li, E., Zhao, A., Shea-Donohue, T., Singer, S. M.
(2007). Mast Cell-Mediated Changes in Smooth Muscle Contractility during Mouse Giardiasis. Infect. Immun.
75: 4514-4518
[Abstract]
[Full Text]