Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, July 2006, p. 3765-3772, Vol. 74, No. 7
0019-9567/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/IAI.01413-05
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Perla Filippini,2,
Sara Travaglione,1
Alessandro Giamboi Miraglia,1
Alessia Fabbri,1 and
Carla Fiorentini1*
Department of Drug Research and Evaluation,1 Department of Technology and Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161, Rome, Italy2
Received 31 August 2005/ Returned for modification 19 December 2005/ Accepted 3 April 2006
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Beside controlling the actin cytoskeleton organization (31), the Rho signaling pathways are also intimately involved in transducing mitogenic signals to the translational apparatus and play a pivotal role in different points of cell cycle regulation (28). Indeed, Rho, Rac, and Cdc42 GTPases have been demonstrated to participate in the control of G1/S progression, primarily through regulation of expression of cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (42).
Hence, considering the Rho-dependent ability of CNF1 to interfere with cytokinesis, thus causing multinucleation (15), and to inhibit cell differentiation (41) in different mammalian cells, we asked whether this toxin could also somehow affect the cell cycle regulatory pathways. This question was addressed by using the human uroepithelial cell line T24, where CNF1 has previously been reported to enhance the transcription and release of proinflammatory cytokines (14). The results reported here allow the inclusion of CNF1 in the family of toxins that influence cell cycle progression and point out the role played by the Rho GTPases in this phenomenon.
|
|
|---|
CNF1 was obtained from strain 392 ISS (kindly provided by V. Falbo, Rome, Italy) and purified as previously described (13). The plasmid coding for a nontoxic mutant of CNF1 that completely lacks the enzymatic activity (C866S) was kindly provided by E. Lemichez (Nice, France) and prepared as previously described (18). To rule out the possibility that the effects observed could be due to lipopolysaccharide contamination, a heat-inactivated (98°C for 10 min) CNF1 protein toxin preparation was used.
In all experiments, T24 cells were seeded at a concentration of 2 x 104/ml, and 24 h after seeding, cells were exposed for 6, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, and 144 h to 1010 M CNF1, heat-inactivated CNF1, or mutant CNF1 [CNF1(C866S)].
Rho GTPase transfections. T24 cells were seeded on 6-cm petri dishes and cotransfected with 2 µg of plasmid DNA encoding dominant-positive forms of either Rho, Rac, or Cdc42 Rho GTPases (RhoV14, RacV12, or Cdc42V12) and green fluorescent protein (GFP) (pEGFP; Clontech) by using Lipofectamine (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Fluorescence microscopy. Control, CNF1-treated, and transfected T24 cells were fixed with 3.7% paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (pH 7.4) for 10 min at room temperature. After a wash in the same buffer, cells were permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 (Sigma) in PBS (pH 7.4) for 10 min at room temperature.
For F-actin visualization, cells were stained with fluorescein isothiocyanate-phalloidin (FITC) (Sigma; working dilution, 0.5 µg/ml) for 30 min at 37°C. For cyclin B1 detection, cells were stained with a monoclonal anti-human cyclin B1 antibody (BD Pharmingen; diluted 1:100). After a wash, an FITC-conjugated anti-mouse secondary antibody (Sigma; diluted 1:100) was added to the samples for 30 min at 37°C.
Finally, after extensive washing, coverslips were mounted with glycerol-PBS (2:1, vol/vol) and analyzed with an Olympus Bx51 Nikon Microphot fluorescence microscope.
Activated Rho GTPase pull-down assay. A pull-down assay was performed as previously described (41). Briefly, cells were lysed in the appropriate buffers, and the cleared lysates were incubated with 80 µg of either the glutathione S-transferase (GST)-PAK-CD (for Rac/Cdc42) or the GST-Rhotekin (for Rho) fusion protein (Cytoskeleton), bound to glutathione-coupled Sepharose beads (Amersham), for 40 min at 4°C. After three washes in the appropriate buffer, the bound proteins were eluted in sample buffer, subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (12% acrylamide), and electrically transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. Membranes were blocked with TBS-T (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.4], 150 mM NaCl, 0.02% Tween 20) containing 2% skim milk (Bio-Rad) for 30 min at room temperature and were then incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies diluted in the same buffer. The following antibodies were used: monoclonal anti-RhoA (Cytoskeleton; diluted 1:500), monoclonal anti-Rac1 (Transduction Laboratories; diluted 1:3,500), and monoclonal anti-Cdc42 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology; diluted 1:500). After extensive washing, immunocomplexes were detected with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated species-specific secondary antibodies (goat anti-mouse antibody, diluted 1:3,000 [Upstate]; goat anti-rabbit antibody, diluted 1:22,000 [Jackson]), followed by an enhanced chemiluminescence reaction (Pierce). Whole-cell lysates (2% of input) were analyzed in parallel.
Cell growth and viability. Control and CNF1-treated cells, detached from the culture dish with 10 mM EDTA (pH 7.4) and 0.25% trypsin in PBS (pH 7.4), were counted, and cell viability was determined by a trypan blue (80 µM; GIBCO BRL-Life Technologies) exclusion method. In each experiment, cell counts were conducted five times. Data represent means ± standard deviations (SD) from three separate experiments performed in duplicate. Growth inhibition was expressed as the percentage of the ratio between CNF1-treated and control cells.
Cytofluorimetric analysis. (i) Cell cycle analysis. T24 cells were trypsinized, washed twice in cold PBS, fixed with ice-cold 70% ethanol, and kept at 4°C for at least 2 h. Before the FACScan acquisition, cells were rehydrated in PBS and stained with a PBS solution containing 50 µg/ml propidium iodide (PI) and 10 µg/ml of RNase at room temperature for at least 20 min. A minimum of 10,000 events were acquired in linear mode with a FACScan (Becton Dickinson) and then analyzed with ModFit software. Transfected and control T24 cells were collected, washed twice in PBS, and fixed for 10 min with cold ethanol (70%, vol/vol) on ice. After this time, samples were centrifuged and resuspended in PBS containing PI at the final concentration of 30 µg/ml and 100 µg/ml of RNase. After 30 min of incubation at room temperature under dark conditions, a minimum of 10,000 GFP-positive events, gated by a dot plot of GFP versus forward scatter, were acquired and analyzed as described above.
(ii) Cyclin B1 detection. Control and treated T24 cells were trypsinized and washed twice in cold PBS. Cells were then fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 15 min and then permeabilized in 0.05% Triton X-100 in PBS for 10 min at 4°C. Samples were washed in cold PBS and incubated for 30 min at 4°C with a monoclonal anti-human cyclin B1 antibody (BD Pharmingen; diluted 1:100) After a wash, an FITC-conjugated anti mouse secondary antibody (Sigma; diluted 1:100) was added to the samples. Samples were washed twice, resuspended in PBS containing 5 µg/ml PI, and incubated for 1 h at 4°C. The fluorescence intensity of cyclin B1 was acquired in linear mode and plotted on the y axis versus the linear fluorescence intensity of PI plotted on the x axis. A minimum of 10,000 events were acquired by the FACScan (BD) and analyzed by CellQuest software (BD).
(iii) Apoptosis analysis with an annexin V-FITC kit. To detect translocation of phosphatidylserine from the inner face to the outer face of the plasma membrane in the first step of apoptosis, an annexin V-FITC kit (Medical & Biological Laboratories Co., Ltd.) was used (9, 26). Control and CNF1-treated cells were detached with EDTA and trypsin solutions. Cell suspensions were washed in ice-cold PBS, collected by centrifugation, and resuspended in annexin V binding buffer (10 mM HEPES-NaOH [pH 7.4], 140 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM CaCl2). Annexin V-FITC and propidium iodide were added to the binding buffer for 10 min at room temperature, and the cells were directly acquired by FACScan (BD). Emissions were collected at wavelengths of 530 nm for FITC and 650 nm for PI and acquired in log mode; a minimum of 10,000 events were acquired and analyzed with CellQuest software (BD).
DNA ladder assay. For the DNA ladder assay, 5 x106 cells were scraped, washed in PBS, and collected by centrifugation. Cell pellets were resuspended in lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.4], 1 mM EDTA, and 0.2% Triton X-100) containing 0.1 µg/ml proteinase K and then incubated at 37°C for 90 min. DNA was cleared from the lysates by centrifugation and then extracted by addition of 0.8 M NaCl and an equal volume of chilled isopropanol. Following an overnight incubation at 20°C, samples were centrifuged, and the pelleted DNA was resuspended in sterile water and treated with 0.5 µg/ml of RNase A at 65°C for 20 min. DNA was then analyzed by gel electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide (0.5 µg/ml).
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (56K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. CNF1 induces actin cytoskeleton reorganization and activation of Rho family proteins in T24 cells. (a to e) Fluorescence micrographs showing F-actin organization in T24 control cells (a) and in cells challenged with CNF1 for different times (b to e). CNF1 provokes a remarkable reorganization of F-actin into stress fibers and membrane ruffles. (f to h) Immunoblots showing the activation kinetics of RhoA (f), Rac1 (g), and Cdc42 (h) GTPases in control and CNF1-treated cells, detected by a pull-down assay. Activated forms of RhoA (Rho-GTP), Rac1 (Rac-GTP), and Cdc42 (Cdc42-GTP), as well as the total amounts of GTPases, are shown. CNF1 induces a time-dependent activation of Rho GTPases followed by their deactivation. Equal protein loading was confirmed by -tubulin detection. Bar, 10 µm.
|
CNF1 influences cell cycle progression in T24 cells. It is well known that, besides controlling the actin cytoskeleton organization, Rho signaling pathways are also intimately involved in cell proliferation and cell cycle regulation (28). Hence, we wondered whether activation of CNF1-dependent Rho GTPases in T24 cells could somehow influence cell growth and the passage of cells through the cell cycle. For this purpose, control and CNF1-treated cells were detached, and cell viability was determined by a trypan blue exclusion test. We found that in T24 cells, CNF1 caused a time-dependent inhibition of cell growth that reached a maximum after 72 h of toxin exposure (Fig. 2a), apparently without induction of death, since dead cells represented 3 to 4% of the total population both in control and in treated cells (data not shown). To determine whether the decreased growth could be linked to an alteration of the cell cycle, we performed a flow cytometric analysis of DNA content. The results obtained are reported in Fig. 2b as a percentage of the ratio between treated and control cells, while two representative histograms of untreated and treated cells are shown in Fig. 2c and d, respectively. The distribution of cell cycle phases was significantly modified by the contact with CNF1 (Fig. 2b to d). In particular, the toxin was able to induce a progressive accumulation of cells in G2/M phase, and this effect, starting as early as after 24 h of CNF1 exposure, became strongly evident after 144 h of toxin treatment (Fig. 2b). In order to verify whether the perturbation of the cell cycle could be a more general response to CNF1, we evaluated this effect on a different uroepithelial cell line, the bladder cell line 5637, already used to investigate the activity of this toxin (27). Our results showed that in this cell type also, CNF1 caused a time- and dose-dependent accumulation of cells in G2/M phase (Table 1). It is worth noting that, when T24 cells were exposed to heat-inactivated CNF1 or to the CNF1(C866S) mutant, no accumulation of cells in G2/M phase was observed (data not shown). We thus wondered whether the activation of Rho GTPases by CNF1 could be involved in shifting cells to the G2/M phases. To answer this question, we cotransfected T24 cells with GFP and with plasmids encoding constitutively activated forms of the Rho GTPases, RhoV14, RacV12, and Cdc42V12, for 24 h, and then we analyzed the cell cycle phase distribution of transfected cells. We found that the expression of each single activated Rho GTPase caused a strong accumulation of cells in both the S and G2/M phases (Table 2), in accordance with previous reports showing the influence of Rho GTPases on the cell cycle (6, 29). Hence, these results support the role played by the Rho GTPases in the CNF1-induced block of cell cycle G2/M transition in T24 cells.
![]() View larger version (20K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. CNF1 induces recruitment of T24 cells in the G2/M cell cycle phase. (a) Graph showing the effect of CNF1 on cell growth. Results are reported as percentages of growth inhibition, determined as the percentage of the ratio between CNF1-treated and control cells, and represent the means ± SD from three separate experiments performed in duplicate. The toxin induces a time-dependent inhibition of cell growth. (b) Graph showing the flow cytometric analysis of cell cycle phase distribution, expressed as the ratio between CNF1-treated and control T24 cells. Note that after 144 h of CNF1 exposure, a high percentage of treated cells are arrested in the G2 stage of the cell cycle. (c and d) Representative histograms showing the DNA content of control T24 cells (c) or cells challenged with CNF1 for 144 h (d).
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Percentage of 5637 cells in G2/M cell cycle phase
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Percentage of cell cycle phase distribution of T24 transfected cells
|
![]() View larger version (30K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. CNF1 induces down-regulation and cytoplasmic sequestration of cyclin B1. (a and b) Graphs showing the fluorescence intensity of cyclin B1 in control and CNF1-treated T24 cells. The results were obtained from four different experiments and are expressed as arbitrary units. Cyclin B1 is down-regulated in cells exposed to the toxin. Note that, in order to avoid cell confluence, two separate experiments with different T24 cell seedings were performed, one for 24 to 72 h (a) and the other for 96 to 120 h (b). (c and d) Fluorescence micrographs of T24 cells that were either untreated (c) or treated with CNF1 for 72 h (d), stained for cyclin B1. (e to h) Fluorescence micrographs of T24 cells transfected with GFP (e) and stained for cyclin B1 (f) or cotransfected with RhoV14/GFP (g) and stained for cyclin B1 (h). CNF1 exposure, as well as RhoV14 transfection, causes the sequestration of cyclin B1 in the cytoplasm. Bar, 10 µm.
|
![]() View larger version (28K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. The CNF1-induced G2/M accumulation does not bring about apoptosis. (a and b) Cytofluorimetric analysis of T24 control cells (a) and of cells treated with CNF1 for 144 h (b), stained with annexin V. (c) Analysis of DNA fragmentation by DNA laddering in T24 cells. Staurosporine (10 µM) was used as a positive control for DNA fragmentation. No signs of apoptosis were observed following CNF1 exposure, whatever the method of detection used.
|
|
|
|---|
Nowadays, the abilities of several bacterial toxins to interfere with the eukaryotic cell cycle through specific effectors and mechanisms are rapidly emerging (reviewed in reference 29). Indeed, it is well known that toxins belonging to the cytolethal distending toxin (CDT) family, produced by a broad array of pathogenic bacteria, cause irreversible cell cycle arrest or death in the target cells by using different strategies (reviewed in reference 40). For example, the Haemophilus ducreyi CDT causes cell cycle arrest and apoptosis via the DNA damage checkpoint pathways, with an effect that is cell specific (7), whereas the Campylobacter jejuni CDT blocks the host cell cycle at the G2/M transition through a complex mechanism that leads to the inactivation of the Cdc25 phosphatase and, as a consequence, to the maintenance of the cyclin B1-Cdk1 complex in the phosphorylated (inactive) form (43). In a similar fashion, the effector protein Cif, recently identified in enteropathogenic and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli strains, acts by inducing a sustained phosphorylation of Cdk1 and cell cycle arrest in G2 (25). On the other hand, the Helicobacter pylori homomultimeric exotoxin VacA and the polyketide mycolactone, secreted by Mycobacterium ulcerans, trigger G1 cell cycle block by mechanisms that remain to be deciphered (8, 19), while the Pasteurella multocida toxin and H. pylori CagA act on the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade, leading to up-regulation of cyclin D1 and moving the cell into the S phase (30, 44).
Concerning the mechanism by which CNF1 causes the accumulation of cells in the G2/M phase, it appeared evident that the enzymatic activity on the Rho GTPases was crucial in the perturbation of the cell cycle, a result not reachable with the mutant CNF1 that bears an alteration of the active site (37). In fact, although principally known for their role in signal transduction processes leading to cytoskeleton-dependent responses, the Rho GTPases are also involved in a huge number of other cellular functions, including cell cycle regulation. It has been demonstrated, for example, that Rho, Rac, and Cdc42 promote G1/S transition by influencing the expression levels of cyclin D1 and those of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors p27 and p21 (reviewed in reference 6). In accordance, in the present work, we showed that transfection of T24 cells with plasmids encoding the single constitutively active forms of Rho, Rac, and Cdc42 G proteins caused a strong accumulation of cells in the S and G2/M phases. On the other hand, the whole activation of both Rho and Rac/Cdc42 GTPases by CNF1 resulted in a significant increase in the percentage of cells only in the G2/M phase; we did not observe any effect on the G1/S transition. This apparent discrepancy can be explained if we consider that the simultaneous activation of the three Rho subfamilies, as in the case of CNF1, could trigger a cellular response that diverges from that induced by the single Rho proteins. In fact, the molecular pathways triggered by the different Rho family members antagonize each other (34, 35), and a dynamic balance between Rho and the Rac/Cdc42 subfamily seems to be crucial for the occurrence of different biological processes. For example, in fibroblasts, activation of Rac has been shown to down-regulate Rho activity (35), and whereas Cdc42 and Rac promote membrane protrusions, Rho promotes membrane retraction through contractile actin and myosin filaments (12). Not only do Rho- and Rac/Cdc42-induced phenotypes appear mutually exclusive, but also Rho- and Rac/Cdc42-mediated pathways regulate each other. Such a phenotypic antagonism reflects their activation states in various cell types, where the levels of active Rac/Cdc42 are inversely correlated with the levels of active Rho. This is true, for example, in epithelial cells that are growing or undergoing cadherin-dependent cell-cell contact formation (35). Finally, we have recently shown that the maintenance of a dynamic balance between Rho and Rac/Cdc42 activities is crucial for correct muscle cell differentiation (41).
This last finding appears in line with the ability of CNF1 to interfere with cell cycle progression, since the irreversible exit from the cell cycle is an essential prerequisite for the differentiation program onset. On the other hand, the ability of CNF1 to block the cell cycle G2/M transition in uroepithelial cells is consistent with a strategy that favors the induction of limited damage to the host as a means to stimulate specific cellular responses rather than rapid cell death. Hence, by inducing cell cycle arrest, CNF1 could influence the renewal and developmental processes of the epithelium, prolonging E. coli colonization through inhibition of cell shedding. Moreover, the lack of epithelial renewal would produce epithelial lesions that might transiently alter the functional capacity of the tissues or facilitate the bacterial invasion of underlying tissues. We should also consider that different bacterial protein toxins able to interfere with the host cell cycle represent a long-term risk of carcinogenesis (25) and that the possible link between bacterial infection and tumorigenesis is an emerging theme in bacterial pathogenesis (5). Helicobacter pylori is now recognized as an important etiological cofactor of gastric cancers, and several other bacteria, such as Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi, Citrobacter rodentium, and Bartonella spp., are suspected to be involved in carcinogenesis (23). In this context, it is possible to speculate that the genotoxic activity of cyclomodulins such as CDTs or Cif could act as a promoting factor for the development of cancer and similarly that CNF1 could be considered a potential promoter in cell transformation.
Although we are aware that the majority of studies on CNF1 have been conducted on cancer cells and not on primary cultures, cell lines remain invaluable means to dissect the pathways controlled by toxins. The hypothesis of CNF1 as a possible transforming factor, in fact, has been suggested by evidence obtained with cell lines that disclose the ability of CNF1 to (i) induce the transactivation of nuclear factor
B (NF-
B) (3), a transcription factor whose activity has been related to cell transformation; (ii) stimulate the expression of Cox-2, a typical marker of cancer (22); and (iii) protect epithelial cells from apoptotic stimuli (16). Concerning apoptosis, it is worth noting that, in contrast to the effect of H. ducreyi CDT (7), the cell spreading and block in G2 due to CNF1 were not followed by cell death, and in our hands, the uroepithelial cell line 5637, previously reported to undergo apoptosis when exposed to CNF1 (27), displayed time- and dose-dependent accumulation of cells in G2/M phase but underwent DNA fragmentation only at doses higher than those commonly used to trigger a cell response (3, 11, 16). All this further supports our view of CNF1 as a prosurvival factor that might possibly contribute to the long-term risk of transformation.
Moreover, it is now largely accepted that chronic inflammation also represents a contributing factor for cancer development (2), and recently we have reported that CNF1 is able to enhance the transcription and release of proinflammatory cytokines in T24 uroepithelial cells (14). All this is consistent with in vivo reports on the contribution of the toxin to the infection and the inflammation processes of uroepithelial tissues (1, 32, 33). In this scenario, we hypothesize that CNF1, by promoting inflammation and perturbing the cell cycle without condemning cells to death, can represent a long-term risk for cell transformation and tumor development in infected uroepithelial tissue. This is in accordance with animal studies indicating urinary tract infections as a significant risk factor for the development of bladder cancer (39).
L.F. and P.F. contributed equally to this work. ![]()
|
|
|---|
B activation by conveying the SCF complex and IkB
to the ruffling membranes. Mol. Biol. Cell 15:1124-1133.
-coupled phospholipase C-ß1. J. Biol. Chem. 272:1268-1275.This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»