Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, July 2006, p. 4133-4141, Vol. 74, No. 7
0019-9567/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/IAI.02094-05
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Eric R. Wagner,2
Hugh J. Willison,2 and
Paul R. Crocker1*
Wellcome Trust Biocentre, University of Dundee, Dow Street, Dundee DD1 5EH, United Kingdom,1 Division of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Glasgow, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow G51 4TF, United Kingdom2
Received 29 December 2005/ Returned for modification 21 March 2006/ Accepted 24 April 2006
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
50 to 80% sequence similarity and have two conserved tyrosine-based motifs in their cytoplasmic tails, including a membrane-proximal immune receptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif (ITIM) and a membrane-distal ITIM-like motif. It has been demonstrated recently that these tyrosine-based motifs are important for the CD33-related siglec-dependent inhibitory signaling via the recruitment and activation of the protein tyrosine phosphatases SHP-1 and SHP-2 (4, 5). Where studied, siglecs show striking differences in glycan binding specificities, which in the cases of Siglec-7 and -9, are determined by a six-amino-acid stretch within the C-C' ß-strand loops of their respective V-set Ig-like domains (40). Although most siglecs are masked at the cell surface by cis interactions with sialic acids on the same cell membrane, unmasking can occur following exposure of the cells to sialidase or in some cases following cellular activation (33). Even masked siglecs have been shown to be capable of interacting with ligands presented on other surfaces in trans, especially if the trans ligands are presented in a high-affinity or high-avidity format (8). It has been proposed that the recognition of "self" sialoglycoconjugates by siglecs could regulate cellular activation during inflammatory and immune responses (12), and support for this model has been obtained from studies of CD22/Siglec-2 on B cells (25) and Siglec-7 on NK cells (29). However, given that certain pathogens can also express sialic acids that are important for pathogenicity, it is possible that the interaction between a pathogen's sialoglycoconjugates and siglecs could modulate the immune response, possibly to the advantage of the pathogen.
Campylobacter jejuni is a human pathogen commonly responsible for gastroenteritic infections. In addition to causing uncomplicated enteritis, C. jejuni strains with sialylated lipooligosaccharides (LOS) are a major causative trigger of the postinfectious autoimmune neuropathies termed the Guillain-Barré syndrome (18). The basis for this association lies in the structural identity between glycans borne by the core oligosaccharide of C. jejuni LOS and the peripheral nerve gangliosides. This identity results in aberrant targeting of the immune response from microbe to nerve, a phenomenon referred to as molecular mimicry (41). C. jejuni can express a variety of different sialyloligosaccharides in its core oligosaccharide, including mimics of gangliosides GM1, GD1a, GD3, and GT1a (37). The pattern of terminal glycosylation is determined by genetic variation in the LOS biosynthetic loci that include genes encoding CMP-NeuAc synthetase and a bifunctional sialyltransferase, CstII, that can transfer sialic acid to galactose in
2,3 linkage as well as to sialic acid itself in
2,8 linkage. Through this variation, a wide variety of ganglioside-mimicking C. jejuni strains have been identified (14).
The aim of this study was to investigate whether ganglioside-like structures presented on the LOS of C. jejuni could be recognized by siglecs and hence implicated in the interactions between pathogens and leukocytes. We demonstrate that Siglec-7, which is naturally expressed on monocytes and natural killer (NK) cells, was the only siglec of 10 tested that was able to mediate specific, sialic acid-dependent interactions both as a soluble recombinant protein and at the cell surface. These findings raise the possibility that, in addition to being important for generating autoimmune antibody responses, C. jejuni LOS may interact with leukocyte-expressed Siglec-7 and modulate host inflammatory and immune responses.
|
|
|---|
2,3,
2,6, and
2,8 sialic acid linkages) was obtained from Calbiochem (Nottingham, United Kingdom). Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse IgF(ab')2 was obtained from Dako (Ely, United Kingdom). The phycoerythrin-conjugated peanut lectin was purchased from Vector Laboratories (Peterborough, United Kingdom). The panel of Siglec-Fc proteins (20) was generated using stably transfected Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell lines cultured in serum-free X-VIVO 10 medium (Cambrex Bio Science, Wokingham, United Kingdom). Each Siglec-Fc fusion protein used contained the entire extracellular region, except for sialoadhesin/Siglec-1 (Sn), which had the first three domains only (11). The concentration of each siglec in the tissue culture supernatants was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, using human IgG as a standard. The mouse anti-human Siglec-7 monoclonal antibody (MAb) S7.7A was previously described as a blocking MAb (29) and was used as purified IgG. A mouse anti-human Sn MAb, 7D2, was used as a nonbinding isotype-matched control antibody (16). Bacteria and cells. The C. jejuni serostrains and isolates with structurally defined core oligosaccharides that were used are shown in Fig. 1A. The HS:19 (formerly O:19) and OH4382 and OH4384 isolates of the HS:19 serostrain (3) were provided by J. Penner and D. Woodward (31, 32). The HS:3 serostrain was provided by A. P. Moran, Galway, Ireland, and contains no known ganglioside-mimicking core oligosaccharide structures (2). Isolate HS:19 has been referred to previously as HS:19(GM1+ GD1a+), isolate OH4384 as HS:19(GM1+ GT1a+), and isolate OH4382 as HS:19(GD3+) (7). For clarity, the isolates in this study are referred to by their original names. It should be noted that the HS typing system is based on antigens of capsular origin, rather than the LOS antigens (22). Bacteria were grown on blood agar plates in a microaerobic atmosphere and harvested into distilled water after 48 h of growth. Bacteria were killed by heating at 60°C for 1 h. LOS were isolated by hot phenol-water extraction, quantified and analyzed for purity by silver staining after sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and thin-layer chromatography, resuspended in distilled water, and stored at 20°C (15). For bacterial adhesion assays and fluorescence microscopy experiments, C. jejuni strains were labeled for 1 h at room temperature with FITC (Molecular Probes, Paisley, United Kingdom). After extensive washes in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) with 0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA), the bacterial pellet was resuspended in the appropriate assay buffer.
![]() View larger version (29K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Sialic acid-dependent binding of Siglec-7 to purified LOS from C. jejuni. (A) Schematic representation of C. jejuni LOS structures used in this study. The sialic acid linkages are indicated. (B) Human and murine (m) siglec-Fc proteins were precomplexed with anti-human IgG-alkaline phosphatase and added to plastic microwells coated with LOS purified from the indicated C. jejuni strains. SnR97A is a mutated form of Sn-Fc that is unable to bind sialic acids and was used as a negative control. Relative binding is given in arbitrary fluorescence units (AFU) determined following the addition of a fluorescein diphosphate substrate. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01 (both apply to binding of HS19 isolates versus binding of HS3). (C) Plastic microwells were coated with LOS from the strains indicated in panel B and treated with V. cholerae sialidase before the addition of precomplexed Siglec-7-Fc. **, P < 0.01 for binding of sialidase-treated bacteria versus untreated bacteria. LPS, lipopolysaccharide. (D) Either an irrelevant MAb (7D2 anti-Sn) or anti-Siglec-7 MAb S7.7A was added to the precomplexed Siglec-7 prior to its addition to the indicated LOS. **, P < 0.01 for binding of bacteria in the presence of S7.7A versus binding of bacteria alone. (B through D) Data from one experiment representative of three independent experiments performed.
|
Siglec-Fc binding assay. Siglec-Fc proteins (10 µg/ml) were complexed with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-human IgG Ab (1:1,000) for 1 h at room temperature. Control MAb 7D2 or blocking anti-Siglec-7 MAb 7.7A was added to the precomplexed Fc proteins 15 min before the incubation with LOS. Ninety-six-well plates were coated with C. jejuni-derived LOS (10 µg/ml in PBS), incubated overnight at 4°C, and treated or not with 0.4 U/ml of sialidase for 1 h at 37°C; the plates were then washed in PBS plus 0.1% BSA and incubated for 1 h at room temperature with precomplexed Siglec-Fc. Unbound Fc proteins were then washed, and 100 µl per well of 10 µM fluorescein diphosphate (Molecular Probes) was added. After incubation at 37°C for 15 to 30 min, fluorescence was measured using a fluorescence plate reader (Cytofluor; PerSeptive Biosystems). For Siglec-Fc binding on living or heat-inactivated bacteria, precomplexed Siglec-Fc proteins were mixed with 5 x 107 bacteria and incubated for 1 h at 4°C. After washes in PBS-0.1% BSA, 100 µl per well of 10 µM fluorescein diphosphate was added to the plates, and the plates were incubated at 37°C for 15 to 30 min. After centrifugation, supernatants were transferred to new 96-well plates, and fluorescence readings were performed as described above.
Fluorescence microscopy. CHO-WT and CHO-Sig7 cells were cultured overnight on glass coverslips (BDH, Lutterworth, United Kingdom). Cells were treated or not with sialidase for 1 h at 37°C, washed, and incubated for 1 h at 4°C with FITC-labeled bacteria at a 10:1 ratio of bacteria to cells. Unbound bacteria were gently washed off, and cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. Images were acquired using an AxioVision imaging system (Imaging Associates, Bicester, United Kingdom) and a Zeiss Axioskop immunofluorescence microscope equipped with a Zeiss 20x objective (Jena, Germany).
Flow cytometry. All incubations were carried out on ice. Cells were incubated with primary MAbs (10 µg/ml) for 30 min, followed by FITC-conjugated rabbit F(ab')2 anti-mouse Ig for 30 min, and then analyzed with a FACSCalibur (Becton Dickinson, Oxford, United Kingdom). For bacterial binding assays, CHO-WT, CHO-Sig7, PBMCs, or purified NK cells were treated or not with 0.4 U/ml of sialidase for 30 min at 37°C, washed in PBS-0.1% BSA, and incubated for 1 h at 4°C with FITC-labeled bacteria at a ratio of 10 bacteria per cell. Bacteria were either left untreated or pretreated with 0.4 U/ml sialidase, as described above for LOS treatment. In some experiments, control MAb 7D2 or anti-Siglec-7 blocking MAb 7.7A was added to the cells 15 min before the incubation with bacteria. Bacterial adhesion to cells was assessed by flow cytometry as described previously (20). Side- and forward-scatter properties were used to distinguish cells (cell gate) from free bacteria, and 10,000 events were collected from the cell gate. Results were expressed as a bacterial binding index, calculated by multiplying the percentage of FITC-positive cells in the cell gate by the mean fluorescence intensity of FITC-positive cells within the cell gate.
Statistics. Values show the means ± standard deviations of triplicate results from single representative experiments. For all data shown, three independent experiments were routinely carried out, unless indicated otherwise. Student's t test was used to determine the level of statistical significance.
|
|
|---|
Recognition of intact C. jejuni by siglecs. The same panel of siglec-Fc proteins was then evaluated with a binding assay using the intact heat-inactivated bacteria of HS:3 and HS:19(GM1+ GT1a+) C. jejuni strains. Consistent with the LOS binding patterns seen in Fig. 1B, Siglec-7 bound strongly to C. jejuni HS:19(GM1+ GT1a+) bacteria (Fig. 2A). Interestingly, mouse CD22 and, to a lesser extent, human Siglec-10 were able to bind both HS:3 and HS:19(GM1+ GT1a+) C. jejuni strains (Fig. 2A), but this was not affected by sialidase treatment of the bacteria (Fig. 2B). In contrast, Siglec-7 binding to HS:19(GM1+ GT1a+) bacteria was abrogated by sialidase treatment (Fig. 2B and C, left panel). Siglec-7 bound equally well or better to live HS:19(GM1+ GT1a+) than to heat-inactivated bacteria (Fig. 2C), and binding to living and heat-inactivated HS:19(GM1+ GT1a+) was similarly blocked by sialidase treatment of the bacteria (Fig. 2C, left panel) or by pretreating Siglec-7-Fc complexes with anti-Siglec-7 S7.7A blocking MAb (Fig. 2C, right panel). Therefore, heat-inactivated bacteria were considered a suitable substitute for live bacteria in subsequent experiments.
![]() View larger version (40K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Sialic acid-dependent binding of Siglec-7 to heat-inactivated and live C. jejuni bacteria. (A) Heat-inactivated HS:3 and HS:19(GM1+ GT1a+) strains were added to precomplexed siglec-Fc proteins in suspension, and binding was measured using a fluorescent substrate. Relative binding is given in arbitrary fluorescence units (AFU). (B) Binding assays were performed with either untreated or sialidase-treated HS:3 or HS:19(GM1+ GT1a+) strains using CD22-Fc, Siglec-7-Fc or Siglec-10-Fc. (C) The binding properties of live or heat-inactivated (HI) C. jejuni bacteria to Siglec-7-Fc were compared either without or with sialidase treatment of bacteria (left panel) or following the preincubation of precomplexed Siglec-7-Fc with anti-Siglec-7 MAb S7.7A or an irrelevant MAb (right panel). Left panel, **, P < 0.01 for binding of sialidase-treated bacteria versus untreated bacteria. Right panel, **, P < 0.01 for binding of bacteria in the presence of S7.7A versus binding of bacteria alone. Panels A and B show data from one experiment representative of three independent experiments performed. Panel C shows data from a single experiment.
|
![]() View larger version (72K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Binding of Siglec-7 expressed on CHO cells to C. jejuni bacteria. HS:3 and HS:19(GM1+ GT1a+) strains were FITC labeled and used in a binding assay with untreated or sialidase-treated CHO-Sig7 cells. Binding of bacteria was assessed by fluorescence microscopy. Bar, 100 µm.
|
![]() View larger version (48K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Flow cytometric analyses of binding interactions between CHO cells expressing Siglec-7 and C. jejuni bacteria. Untreated or sialidase-treated HS:3 and HS:19(GM1+ GT1a+) strains were FITC labeled and used in a binding assay with untreated or sialidase-treated CHO-WT cells and CHO-Sig7 cells. (A) Fluorescence-activated cell sorter histograms showing binding of bacteria (gray histograms) are compared with histograms of cells incubated in the absence of bacteria (open histograms). (B) Quantification of bacterial binding to CHO-WT and CHO-Sig7 cells by flow cytometry. Data show means ± 1 standard deviation of binding indices derived from three independent experiments.
|
![]() View larger version (64K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Siglec-7-expressing NK cells and monocytes recognize C. jejuni HS:19(GM1+ GT1a+) bacteria in a sialic acid-dependent manner. Untreated or sialidase-treated HS:3 and HS:19(GM1+ GT1a+) strains were FITC labeled and incubated with human PBMCs (A) or purified NK cells (B). (A) Binding of bacteria was assessed by flow cytometry following labeling with the indicated MAbs: CD3, T cells; CD19, B cells; CD56, NK cells; CD14, monocytes. Values show the bacterial binding indices for each gated population of cells. (B) Binding of bacteria to purified NK cells from two different human donors. Open histograms show background fluorescence in the absence of added bacteria, and shaded histograms show binding signals obtained in the presence of bacteria. Values show the bacterial binding indices for each population of cells.
|
|
|
|---|
Siglec-7 contains three Ig-like extracellular domains, and sialic acid recognition is mediated by the N-terminal V-set Ig-like domain. Siglec-7 is unusual among the CD33-related siglecs in its strong preference for
2,8-linked disialylated glycans and internally branched
2,6-linked sialic acids over terminal
2,6- or
2,3-linked sialic acids (6, 40). The
2,8 disialic acid structure is represented in both the GD3-like and GT1a-like LOS preparations that showed sialic acid-dependent binding to Siglec-7 and is therefore likely to be responsible for the binding observed (Fig. 1A). Siglec-9 is highly related to Siglec-7, yet it shows strikingly different binding preferences for sialylated glycans, including GD1a oligosaccharide, which is poorly recognized by Siglec-7 (40). It was surprising, therefore, that the LOS containing a GD1a-like structure was not recognized by Siglec-9 or by other siglecs such as Sn or MAG, which also bind well to this structure (34). GM1 has so far not been shown to be recognized by any siglec, and GD1a and GM1 are reported to be present in a ratio of about 1:1 in the HS:19(GM1+ GD1a+) strain (7). Therefore, it is possible that, under the conditions used, the density of GD1a-like LOS was too low to support binding or that steric hindrance by core sugars within the LOS prevented interaction with these siglecs. Similar conclusions concerning steric hindrance were reached in a previous study of siglec binding to the Neisseria meningitidis LOS that presents
2,3-linked sialic acid on a lacto-N-neotetraose capping structure. N. meningitidis LOS was recognized only by Sn and Siglec-5, whereas several other siglecs were expected to bind this LOS based on their binding specificities, defined with short oligosaccharide ligands (20). In the present study, the strong binding of Siglec-7 to LOS from the HS:19(GM1+ GT1a+) strain could be due to a higher affinity of Siglec-7 for the GT1a structure than of Siglec-9 for the GD1a structure, or the ratio of GT1a to GM1 in this strain may be more favorable for Siglec-7 binding. In addition, we cannot rule out the possibility that Siglec-7 has a low affinity for GM1 that leads to additive binding with GT1a; this could also explain why LOS from the HS:19(GM1+ GD1a+) strain still showed low-level sialidase-resistant, anti-Siglec-7-inhibitable binding (Fig. 1C and D), since the internal sialic acid on GM1 is resistant to sialidase treatment but could contribute to weak interactions with the sialic acid-binding site of Siglec-7.
C. jejuni can cause severe gastroenteritis in humans that is accompanied by a cellular inflammatory response involving an influx of both neutrophils and monocytes (reviewed in reference 38). Although neutrophils are thought to kill complement-opsonized bacteria efficiently following phagocytosis (23), this does not appear to be the case with monocytes and macrophages, in which even nonopsonized C. jejuni organisms are rapidly phagocytosed and then survive for several days (17, 24, 35, 36). Survival in macrophages could be important for the dissemination of bacteria within the gut and systemically to the joints in relation to the reactive arthritis observed in a small proportion of C. jejuni-infected patients (23). Infected macrophages elicit a strong cytokine response that is likely to exacerbate the inflammatory response, and they may also undergo caspase-independent apoptosis (21, 35). Since ligation of CD33-related siglecs has been shown to modulate both cytokine production and apoptosis (17, 35), it would be interesting to determine if bacterially mediated ligation of Siglec-7 during monocyte infection has any influence on these key cellular processes. Similar to all human CD33-related siglecs, Siglec-7 contains an ITIM and an ITIM-like motif that can be tyrosine phosphorylated and recruit SHP-1 and SHP-2 (4, 19, 39). Several studies have shown that ligation of Siglec-7 can modulate cellular activation functions, including the inhibition of NK cell cytotoxicity (13, 29), inhibition of T-cell receptor signaling in transfected Jurkat cells (19), inhibition of serotonin secretion in transfected rat basophil leukemic cells (4), and inhibition of Ca2+ flux in transfected U937 monocytic cell lines (39).
In addition to monocytes, Siglec-7 is also expressed on monocyte-derived macrophages and dendritic cells (28). Little is known about the role of dendritic cells in the resolution of C. jejuni infections, but Siglec-7-dependent interactions between LOS and dendritic cells could potentially modulate the function of these key cells that link the innate and adaptive immune systems. CD33-related siglecs have also been shown to mediate endocytosis (27, 28), and Siglec-7 could therefore contribute to the uptake process by macrophages and other cell types. Cellular receptors that mediate the uptake of nonopsonized bacteria have not been characterized, and it is of interest that, in the present study, we could demonstrate sialic acid-dependent binding to monocytes and NK cells. This indicates that despite the masking of Siglec-7 on NK cells, demonstrated previously using glycopolymers (29), the presentation of ganglioside-like structures on C. jejuni, such as GT1a, can overcome cis inhibition and promote cellular interactions. NK cells are an important source of cytokines, such as gamma interferon, and have been shown to contribute to host protection in experimental shigella infections of mice (26); however, their potential role in campylobacter infections has not been studied.
In conclusion, we provide the first evidence that the sialylated LOS of C. jejuni are recognized by Siglec-7 and that this can lead to an enhanced, sialic acid-dependent association with Siglec-7-positive cells, including monocytes and NK cells. It will be of considerable interest in the future to investigate whether this interaction modulates the host immune response, either to the benefit of the pathogen or, alternatively, to the benefit of the host.
This work was supported by a Wellcome Trust Senior Fellowship (GR047677MA), awarded to P.R.C., and a Wellcome Trust Programme grant, awarded to H.J.W.
Present address: UPRES EA 3889 Immunologie Hématologie, Department of Biology, Centre Eugène Marquis, 35042 Rennes, France. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»