Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, July 2006, p. 4157-4163, Vol. 74, No. 7
0019-9567/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/IAI.00007-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Bacteriology and Immunology, Haartman Institute, University of Helsinki, and HUSLAB, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland,1 Statutory and Exotic Bacterial Diseases, Veterinary Laboratories Agency, Surrey, United Kingdom,2 Department of Laboratory Chemistry, Section of Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital Malmö, University of Malmö, Malmö, Sweden3
Received 3 January 2006/ Returned for modification 11 February 2006/ Accepted 12 April 2006
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Currently, epidemic LBRF is found in Africa (35). Crowding, poor hygiene, and poverty are risk factors for large outbreaks, such as the epidemics seen during World War II, when millions of soldiers and civilians were infected in Southern Europe. Relapsing fever spirochetes enter the bloodstream from the site of the insect or tick bite wound. This is soon followed by a massive spirochetemia, with spirochetes also invading through the endothelium. The first septic episode ends upon development of antibodies, but because relapsing fever spirochetes are able to change their variable outer surface proteins, the spirochetemia returns, causing one or more febrile relapses (5, 31). Clinical disease is severe, with mortality reaching 30 to 70% without antimicrobial treatment (11).
Antibody responses against relapsing fever Borrelia species are primarily directed against outer surface lipoproteins. Two major protein groups have been identified, namely, variable small proteins (approximately 22 kDa) and variable large proteins (approximately 38 kDa) (6). These proteins have been studied most thoroughly for B. hermsii (4, 5) and B. turicatae (27, 30). It is probable that all of the relapsing fever Borrelia species share the same antigenic variation scheme as that described in detail for these two species.
While spirochetes are present in blood, they must evade the immune defense systems. Before the acquired immune responses lead to the production of antibodies, the alternative pathway of complement operates as a major innate immune defense system against the invading organisms. In the presence of antibodies, complement acts as an effector system, mainly via the classical pathway (CP). Both pathways lead to coating of the target surface with C3b. Together with their cleavage products, such as iC3b, the C3b molecules opsonize the target for phagocytosis. Further activation can lead to the formation of lytic membrane attack complexes. To avoid overconsumption of the components of the complement cascade and to protect self cells from harmful attacks, complement activation must be tightly regulated. This is mediated by regulatory proteins in plasma and on cell surfaces.
The major fluid-phase regulators of complement are factor H (FH), for antibody-independent alternative pathway activation, and C4b-binding protein (C4BP), for antibody-dependent CP activation (7). These regulators accelerate decay of the C3 convertases (C3bBb and C4b2a, respectively) (15, 25, 36) and act as cofactors for the irreversible inactivation of C3b and C4b, respectively. As a net effect, these functions prevent complement-mediated destruction of the target in both the absence and presence of antibodies.
Acquisition of the host plasma complement regulator FH has been shown to be beneficial for complement evasion among other spirochetes, such as Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto and B. afzelii, which express at least two FH binding proteins (2, 16, 19, 20). Also, the relapsing fever agents B. hermsii and B. parkerii have been shown to bind FH, while no binding has been observed for B. turicatae (22). B. hermsii expresses a unique 20-kDa outer surface protein (FhbA) responsible for FH binding (17).
For this study, we have studied the only known agent of LBRF, B. recurrentis, and a TBRF agent, B. duttonii, to test the serum sensitivities of relapsing fever Borrelia species. We demonstrate the acquisition of the complement regulator FH by both types of Borrelia and describe a hitherto unidentified immune evasion mechanism for spirochetes by showing binding of C4BP to both types of relapsing fever Borrelia and, to some extent, also to the Lyme disease spirochete, B. burgdorferi sensu stricto. Binding occurs when Borrelia spirochetes are incubated with purified proteins or in whole plasma. Using factor I cofactor assays, we show that the surface-acquired FH and C4BP retain their functional activities on the surfaces of relapsing fever spirochetes. This indicates that the binding of FH and C4BP contributes to serum resistance of relapsing fever spirochetes and suggests that multiple simultaneous complement evasion strategies are used by these organisms in the pathogenesis of relapsing fever.
|
|
|---|
Serum sensitivity assay. The sensitivity of spirochetes to human serum was analyzed by cultivating B. recurrentis A17, B. duttonii La, B. burgdorferi sensu stricto B31, and B. garinii 50/97 in 50% normal human serum (NHS) in BSK-H complete medium. Bacteria (1 x 107) were pipetted into 48- or 96-well microtiter plates (Nunc A/S, Roskilde, Denmark) in triplicate in BSK-H complete medium. Fresh nonimmune NHS was collected from a healthy laboratory person and added to the wells to achieve a final concentration of 50% in 200 µl. The same serum was used as a control after heat inactivation (30 min at +56°C) (HI-NHS). The presence of antibodies against the relapsing fever and Lyme disease Borrelia species in NHS was tested by using whole-cell lysates in a Western blot analysis. At 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, and 24-h time points, 20-µl samples were added to 180 µl of BSK-H complete medium to analyze the viability of the Borrelia species after exposure to NHS. After removal of each sample, 20 µl of fresh 50% NHS (diluted in BSK-H medium) was added to prevent total consumption of complement in the mixture. The viability of the spirochetes within these secondary cultures was checked microscopically, using dark-field optics, after 48 h of cultivation at +33°C.
Serum absorption experiments. Freshly harvested borrelia organisms (1 x 109) were washed four times with Veronal-buffered saline (VBS; 145 mM NaCl, 5 mM barbiturate, pH 7.4). The spirochetes were incubated in HI-NHS for 60 min at +37°C on a shaker (750 rpm) and washed five times with VBS. The last wash fraction was collected. Proteins bound to the surfaces of bacteria were eluted with 0.1 M glycine-HCl, pH 2.0, and supernatants were collected after centrifugation (8,000 x g, 10 min). Samples of the wash and eluate fractions were subjected to nonreducing sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Nonspecific binding was blocked with 3% fat-free milk in phosphate-buffered saline (120 mM NaCl, 30 mM phosphate, pH 7.3) for 1 h at 22°C. The membranes were incubated with a sheep polyclonal anti-C4BP antibody (The Binding Site, Birmingham, United Kingdom) at a 1:2,000 dilution for 12 h at 4°C. After five washes with phosphate-buffered saline, a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated rabbit anti-sheep immunoglobulin G antibody (Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom) was added at a dilution of 1:2,000, and the membranes were incubated at 22°C for 3 h. After the membranes were washed, the bound antibodies were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence.
Protein binding assays. C4BP was purified from human plasma as described previously (14), and FH was purchased from Quidel (San Diego, CA) or Calbiochem (La Jolla, CA). C4BP, FH, and bovine serum albumin (BSA; Sigma, St. Louis, MO) were labeled with 125I by using the Iodogen technique (Pierce Chemical Corp., Rockford, IL) (32). Freshly harvested bacteria were washed three times with VBS diluted 1:3 containing 0.1% gelatin (1/3 GVBS). Approximately 5 x 107 bacteria/assay were incubated with the radiolabeled proteins (approximately 20,000 cpm/assay) in 1/3 GVBS for 30 min at 37°C on a shaker (750 rpm). Cell-associated and free radioactive proteins were separated by centrifuging the samples through 200-µl columns of 20% (wt/vol) sucrose in 1/3 GVBS. Radioactivities in the supernatant and pellet fractions were measured with a gamma counter, and the amounts of bound proteins were calculated as percentages of the total radioactivities in the corresponding pellets and supernatants. All experiments were performed in quadruplicate. Some radioactivity (1 to 3%) was found to be sedimented in the absence of bacteria, possibly due to protein aggregates. These values were considered background and were subtracted from the values shown. In an inhibition assay, nonlabeled C4BP was added to the reaction mixture prior to the addition of 125I-C4BP.
Cofactor assay for C4b and C3b inactivation. The cofactor activities of the surface-attached C4BP and FH molecules for factor I were assayed by cleavage of 125I-C4b and 125I-C3b, respectively. The bacteria (1 x 109/assay) were washed three times with VBS and incubated with HI-NHS (at a 1:2 dilution) or purified C4BP (10 µg/ml) for 120 min on a shaker (700 rpm) at 37°C. Bacteria were washed three times with VBS, followed by the addition of factor I (50 ng/reaction) and either 125I-C4b or 125I-C3b (all from Calbiochem), and the mixtures were incubated for 60 min at 37°C. The bacteria were pelleted by centrifugation, and the supernatants were subjected to SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions. The gels were fixed with 5% acetic acid for 30 min and dried prior to autoradiography to detect the cleavage products of 125I-C4b and 125I-C3b. As a positive control, purified C4BP or FH (50 ng) was added to the reaction mixture. As negative controls, 125I-C4b and 125I-C3b were incubated in the presence of factor I alone.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Comparison of survival of Borrelia burgdorferi and that of relapsing fever spirochetes in human seruma
|
![]() View larger version (39K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Acquisition of FH (A) and C4BP (B) from human serum by B. recurrentis (strains A6 and A17), B. duttonii (strains La, Ku, and Kw), and B. burgdorferi sensu stricto (strain IA). The spirochetes (1 x 109) were incubated in either HI-NHS or VBS prior to washings and elution of the bound proteins. Aliquots of the last wash (W) and the eluate (E) fractions were subjected to nonreducing SDS-PAGE and analyzed with anti-FH (A) or anti-C4BP (B) antibody by Western blotting. Binding of the antibodies to proteins in HI-NHS samples (diluted 1:500) is shown as a positive control. The mobilities of the size markers are shown on the right.
|
![]() View larger version (12K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Binding of purified FH, C4BP, and BSA to B. recurrentis (strains A5 and A17) and B. duttonii (strains La and Ku) (A) and of FH and C4BP to B. duttonii (KU) and B. burgdorferi sensu stricto (IA) (B). The spirochetes were incubated with 125I-labeled FH, C4BP, or BSA (approximately 50,000 cpm each) for 30 min, and unbound protein was separated from borrelia-bound protein by centrifugation through 20% sucrose columns. The background was detected as sedimentation of the radioactivity in the absence of any bacteria (1 to 3%) and was subtracted from the raw data, resulting in the values shown. Means ± standard deviations of quadruplicate assays are shown.
|
Specificity of binding of C4BP. The specificity of C4BP binding to Borrelia spp. was studied by using 125I-labeled C4BP and increasing concentrations (0.1 µg/ml to 100 µg/ml) of unlabeled C4BP in a binding assay. Unlabeled C4BP was found to inhibit binding of 125I-labeled C4BP in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 3). At a concentration of 100 µg/ml of cold C4BP, binding was inhibited by 70% for B. recurrentis (strain A6) and by 86% for B. duttonii (strain Ku).
![]() View larger version (10K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Specificity of binding of 125I-labeled C4BP to B. recurrentis (strain A6) and B. duttonii (strain Ku). Spirochetes (5 x 107) were incubated with 125I-labeled C4BP for 30 min in the presence of the indicated amounts of unlabeled C4BP. Unbound protein was separated from the surface-bound protein by centrifuging the bacteria through 20% sucrose columns. The background was detected as sedimentation of the radioactivity in the absence of any bacteria and was subtracted from the raw data.
|
![]() View larger version (48K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Cofactor activities of relapsing fever spirochete surface-bound C4BP (A) and FH (B). Bacteria (1 x 109) were incubated in HI-NHS or with purified C4BP (10 µg/ml) and washed, and factor I was added in combination with 125I-labeled C4b (A) or 125I-labeled C3b (B). Samples from supernatants were run in reducing SDS-PAGE gels, after which the gels were dried and visualized by autoradiography. As positive controls, 125I-labeled C4b (A) and 125I-labeled C3b (B) were incubated in the presence of factor I and purified C4BP and FH, respectively. The cleavage of 125I-labeled C4b is observed by the appearance of the C4d fragment, and that of 125I-labeled C3b is observed by the appearance of the ' 68-kDa, 46-kDa, and 43-kDa fragments.
|
|
|
|---|
B. recurrentis and B. duttonii remain clinically significant pathogens in their areas of endemicity. Furthermore, B. recurrentis retains its potential to cause local or larger epidemics under poor sanitary conditions. The isolates used in this study were obtained from patients from the areas where B. recurrentis and B. duttonii are currently endemic, and the spirochetes were of the lowest possible passage number available (13). There are no vaccines available against any of the relapsing fever Borrelia spp., although a vaccine would be highly desirable in the areas of endemicity. Difficult cultivation methods have hampered research on the molecular pathology caused by the relapsing fever Borrelia spp., and studies on, for example, the immune evasion mechanisms of these pathogens are scarce.
Most B. burgdorferi sensu stricto and B. afzelii strains studied bind human FH, and there seem to be at least two distinct groups of FH-binding proteins on these spirochetes (1-3, 16, 20, 21). Therefore, it is not surprising that relapsing fever Borrelia spp., such as B. hermsii, that cause a more severe septic disease have also been reported to bind FH (17, 22). Some other TBRF-causing species, such as B. turicatae, do not bind human FH (22). It remains to be studied if the ability of a strain or species to bind FH affects its capacity to cause certain pathologies in, for example, the central nervous system. The ability of different host species to bind FH could also play a role in the known species specificity of the different relapsing fever Borrelia spp.
In this study, we have shown that several isolates of B. recurrentis and B. duttonii bind human C4BP in addition to FH. C4BP binding has not been shown previously with any other spirochetes or related bacteria. Since the Lyme disease Borrelia strains cause chronic infections with formation of antibodies, it should also be beneficial for Lyme disease spirochetes to evade the classical complement pathway. Indeed, we observed that the studied strain (IA) of B. burgdorferi sensu stricto also bound C4BP (Fig. 1 and 2B), although apparently more weakly than the relapsing fever Borrelia spp.
During relapsing fever, the Borrelia spirochetes persist and multiply in the blood of patients for several days, or even weeks. The best-known immune evasion mechanism demonstrated for the relapsing fever Borrelia spp. is antigenic variation, i.e., the ability to change the major outer surface proteins in cycles, leading to persistence of the strain as a new "serotype" in the human host (5, 31). Antigenic variation leads to the change of only one type of surface protein, while the other surface structures remain unchanged. Since other antigenic structures exist on the bacteria, it is likely that some of the antibodies generated recognize these spirochetes. Therefore, the acquisition of C4BP on the bacterial surface could be essential for down-regulating antibody-dependent CP activation and the development of clinical fever relapses. The evasion of adaptive immunity by a combination of antigenic variation and C4BP acquisition might underlie the long bacteremic course and high mortality of the disease.
With the exception of certain primates, there is no animal model for B. recurrentis since humans are the only known host. A mouse model exists for the New World endemic relapsing fever Borrelia spp., and this has been utilized in previous studies on host-microbe interactions. The role of complement in the host defense against relapsing fever borrelia spirochetes was investigated by using a mouse model with B. hermsii where wild-type mice were compared with C3- and C5-deficient mice (9, 10). In those studies, no difference was observed in the abilities of the different mice to clear the infection, suggesting that complement is not effective against the spirochetes in vivo. The current study provides a good explanation for this, since at least B. recurrentis and B. duttonii are able to acquire both alternative and classical pathway regulators from host plasma in a way that allows the regulators to be functionally active. It remains to be studied, however, whether the relapsing fever Borrelia spp. bind mouse FH and C4BP. It is known that OspE of B. burgdorferi is able to bind mouse FH (34), and we assume that at least those species of relapsing fever borrelias that are able to cause severe disease in mice should be able to evade mouse complement. These species are therefore likely to bind mouse FH and C4BP. Interestingly, different species causing tick-borne relapsing fever have different wildlife hosts, and the reason for this species specificity is not fully understood. The role of complement regulator acquisition from different animal sera as an aspect of species specificity warrants future investigation.
The ability of B. recurrentis and B. duttonii to acquire both FH and C4BP is an exceptional phenomenon in the microbe-host relationship. There are reports that only three pathogens, Streptococcus pyogenes (group A streptococci) (18, 26), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (28, 29), and Candida albicans (23, 24), are able to bind both FH and C4BP. In the case of S. pyogenes, the receptor for both ligands is M protein, and most of the strains that bind FH do not seem to bind C4BP, and vice versa. In the case of N. gonorrhoeae, the receptors for FH and C4BP do not seem to be the same. In the case of C. albicans, the ligands have not yet been identified. FH and C4BP share a similar structural framework, since they consist of multiple short consensus repeat domains and share common binding features for heparin, C3b, and streptococcal M protein. It is known that Lyme disease Borrelia spirochetes possess at least two receptors for FH (OspE and CRASP-1 proteins). The receptors for FH and C4BP have not been identified for B. recurrentis and B. duttonii, but it is possible that multiple receptors exist or that one receptor binds both FH and C4BP. The novel finding that at least one strain of Lyme disease Borrelia is able to bind C4BP warrants further studies both to describe the extent of that ability in other strains and species and to search for the borrelial receptor for C4BP.
In conclusion, this study has demonstrated a novel immune evasion strategy for the relapsing fever Borrelia spp. It shows that two relapsing fever spirochetes, B. recurrentis and B. duttonii, acquire the human complement regulators FH and C4BP from human plasma, which is the pathophysiological niche of these organisms. The regulators bind to the bacterial surface in a way that retains their functional activities. It is likely that these properties help relapsing fever spirochetes to survive for prolonged periods in human blood and to cause severe disease.
This study was supported by the Finnish Cultural Foundation, The Academy of Finland (201506 and 202529), The Biomedicum Foundation, Maud Kuistila Foundation, The Sigrid Juselius Foundation, and The Helsinki University Central Hospital Funds.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»