Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, July 2006, p. 4354-4356, Vol. 74, No. 7
0019-9567/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/IAI.01783-05
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Immunochemistry and Biochemical Microbiology, Research Center Borstel-Center for Medicine and Biosciences, 23845 Borstel,1 Institute of Anatomy, University of Lübeck, 23538 Lübeck,3 Department of Biochemical Pharmacology, University of Constance, 78457 Constance, Germany,4 Department of Physiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of CaliforniaLos Angeles, Los Angeles, California 900952
Received 3 November 2005/ Returned for modification 22 December 2005/ Accepted 18 March 2006
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
B translocation and the production and release of inflammatory cytokines (2). Investigations into the cellular distribution of components of the LPS receptor complex have shown that TLR4/MD2, CD14, and a variety of other proteins associate with each other and form complex receptor clusters. Also, the IL-1 receptor associates several subunits into an active receptor complex. However, until now no indication of a common use of membrane-associated accessory proteins by these receptors has been found. We have shown that the large-conductance calcium- and voltage-activated potassium channel MaxiK (BK channel) is involved in the activation of human macrophages by LPS (3, 11). However, the specificity and mechanism of the activation of this ion channel and its precise role in the generation of proinflammatory signals are not yet fully understood. In order to investigate possible interactions of MaxiK and TLR/IL-1-receptor in macrophage activation by different virulence factors and IL-1, we performed electrophysiological measurements on human macrophages. In excised outside-out patches from the macrophage cytoplasmic membrane prepared as described in reference 3, the application of either LPS from Salmonella enterica serovar Minnesota strain R595 (extracted according to the phenol-chloroform/petrol ether procedure [6]), soluble PG (isolated from penicillin-treated Staphylococcus aureus as described elsewhere [9]), or recombinant human IL-1 (R&D Systems) to the extracellular face of the patch led to a strong increase in channel activity as demonstrated by the increase in the open probability (determined according to the method of Glasbey and Martin [6a]) of MaxiK compared to untreated controls (Fig. 1A to C). Single-channel conductance, however, was not affected by LPS, PG, or IL-1. Channel activation by IL-1 could be suppressed by adding an IL-1 receptor antagonist (ra IL-1; 400 ng/ml; R&D Systems) to the bathing solution (data not shown), proving that channel activation is induced by the interaction of the cytokine with its receptor.
![]() View larger version (23K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Lipopolysaccharide, peptidoglycan, and interleukin-1 activate MaxiK in the cytoplasmic membranes of human macrophages. Shown are open probabilities (means ± standard deviations) of the MaxiK channel in excised outside-out membrane patches in a bathing solution of Hanks balanced salt solution after the application of either LPS at the indicated concentrations (A), 5 µg/ml PG (B), or 15 ng/ml IL-1 (C) as a function of the applied membrane potential. Current/voltage curves were fitted to sigmoid functions. The data shown are representative of three independent experiments.
|
To show the requirement for MaxiK in the process of cytokine release upon macrophage activation, we employed pharmacological channel blockade. Macrophages differentiated from human peripheral blood mononuclear cells were stimulated for 4 h with LPS, PG, the synthetic LP Pam3CSK4, or LTA isolated from penicillin-treated Staphylococcus aureus as described elsewhere (7) in the absence or presence of the MaxiK-specific blocker paxilline (Alomone Labs) or the nonspecific K+ channel blocker tetraethylammonium (TEA) (Sigma). For all stimuli, the release of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-
) was inhibited in the presence of paxilline or TEA (Fig. 2). The inhibitory effects of the blockers did not affect the integrity of the cells, as checked by trypan blue exclusion. As was the case for the bacterial virulence factors, the application of paxilline or TEAand of the IL-1 receptor antagonist (data not shown)also inhibited IL-1-induced cytokine release from macrophages (Fig. 2). In contrast, when cells were stimulated with TNF-
, paxilline did not inhibit the release of cytokines (data not shown), indicating that the inhibitory effect of paxilline does not interfere with TNF receptor-linked signaling pathways. Our results allow us to conclude that activation of MaxiK in human macrophages represents a general principle in transmembrane signaling initiated by members of the TLR and IL-1 receptor family. The dramatic inhibitory effect of MaxiK channel blockade on release of TNF-
from macrophages stimulated by various stimuli shows the involvement of the functional MaxiK channel in cell activation. Since channel activation is induced by ligands of different TLRs and the IL-1 receptor, it is reasonable to propose that the intracellular signaling domain, referred to as the Toll/interleukin-1 receptor (TIR) domain, is the common starting point for MaxiK activation.
![]() View larger version (26K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. MaxiK function is required for the inflammatory response to bacterial virulence factors and to interleukin-1. Shown is TNF- production from human blood macrophages (2 · 105 cells per well in a 96-well dish) after 4 h of stimulation with either LPS (1 ng/ml), PG (1 µg/ml), LP (100 ng/ml), LTA (10 µg/ml), or IL-1 (10 ng/ml) in the absence or presence of the MaxiK blocker paxilline (20 µM) or the K+ channel blocker TEA (20 mM). The cytokine response to each stimulus in the absence of a channel blocker was set at 100%, and the corresponding data were normalized to these values. The absolute amounts of TNF- in the supernatants of the stimulated cells are given above the rows. Data shown are means ± standard deviations from triplicate samples of one donor and are representative of three independent experiments with cells from different donors.
|
![]() View larger version (82K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Colocalization of MaxiK and TLR4 determined by confocal microscopy. HEK293-TLR4/MD-2-MaxiKGFP cells were subjected to time lapse experiments before (left) and 3 min after (right) stimulation with 10 ng/ml LPS. Cells were placed on a temperature-adjustable microscope stage and equilibrated to 37°C. In unstimulated cells, TLR4 (yellow) and MaxiK (blue) localize to different compartments. Upon stimulation with LPS, distinct areas where TLR4 and MaxiK colocalize can be observed (white pixels in the image). Lower panels are enlargements of boxed areas. Bars, 10 µM. Results shown are from one experiment representative of three independent experiments.
|
This work was funded by DFG grants (SFB 367 project B8 and Emmy-Noether grant SCHR 621/2-1).
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»