Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, August 2006, p. 4744-4749, Vol. 74, No. 8
0019-9567/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/IAI.00315-06
-D-Glutamic Acid-Protein Conjugates
Laboratory of Developmental and Molecular Immunity, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
Received 24 February 2006/ Returned for modification 3 April 2006/ Accepted 28 April 2006
|
|
|---|
-D-glutamic acid (
DPGA), is an essential virulence factor of B. anthracis. The capsule inhibits innate host defense through its antiphagocytic action.
DPGA is a poor immunogen, but when covalently bound to a carrier protein, it elicits serum antibodies. To identify the optimal construct for clinical use, synthetic
DPGAs of different lengths were bound to carrier proteins at different densities. The advantages of the synthetic over the natural polypeptide are the homogeneous chain length and end groups, allowing conjugates to be accurately characterized and standardized and their chemical compositions to be related to their immunogenicities. In the present study, we evaluated, in addition to methods reported by us, hydrazone, oxime, and thioether linkages between
DPGA and several proteins, including bovine serum albumin, recombinant Pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin A, recombinant B. anthracis protective antigen (rPA), and tetanus toxoid (TT). The effects of the dosage and formulation on the immunogenicities of the conjugates were evaluated in mice. All conjugates were immunogenic. The optimal
DPGA chain length of 10 to 15 amino acids and the density, an average of 15 mol
DPGA per mol of protein, were confirmed. The thioether bond was the optimal linkage type, and TT and rPA were the best carriers. The optimal dosage was 1.2 to 2.5 µg of
DPGA per mouse, and adsorption of the conjugates onto aluminum hydroxide significantly increased the antibody response to the protein with a lesser effect on anti-
DPGA levels. |
|
|---|
The addition of components other than those of anthrax toxin to improve vaccine-induced protection has been considered (22). The capsule, composed of poly-
-D-glutamic acid (
DPGA), is an essential virulence factor and antiphagocytic, and antibodies to this polypeptide have been shown to be opsonophagocytic and protective in mice (3, 10, 22).
DPGA by itself is a poor immunogen and does not induce booster responses, probably because of its simple homopolymeric structure, similar to those of capsular polysaccharides; it is a T-cell-independent antigen and of D-amino acid composition (7). These immunologic properties can be overcome by covalent binding of the T-cell-independent antigen to immunogenic proteins (22). Because of the success in inducing protective levels of antibodies in infants against systemic infection with capsulated pathogens, we developed conjugates of
DPGA with several carrier proteins, including bovine serum albumin (BSA), recombinant B. anthracis protective antigen (rPA), and recombinant Pseudomonas aeruginosa exoprotein A (rEPA). Unlike
DPGA alone, these conjugates were immunogenic in mice, with booster responses upon reinjection. Conjugate-induced antibodies were opsonophagocytic (22, 27). This study describes additional synthetic schemes in an attempt to develop the most immunogenic conjugates.
|
|
|---|
amino groups by Fields' assay (6), benzaldehyde groups by colorimetric reaction with 2-hydrazinopyridine (Solulink, San Diego, CA), hydrazide was measured as reported previously (23), and thiolation was measured by release of 2-pyridylthio groups (A343) (1). Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis used 14% gels according to the manufacturer's instructions (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Double immunodiffusion was performed in 1.0% agarose gels in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) with rabbit anti-
DPGA, rabbit anti-BSA (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), goat anti-exotoxin A (List Biological Laboratories, Inc.), anti-tetanus toxoid (obtained from W. Vann, FDA, Bethesda MD), and anti-B. anthracis protective antigen (obtained from S. Leppla, NIH/NIAID, Bethesda, MD). Aluminum hydroxide was used as Alhydrogel (Staten Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark). MALDI-TOF. Mass spectra were obtained with an OmniFlex matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) instrument (Bruker Daltonics) operated in the linear mode. Samples for analysis were desalted, and 1 µl was mixed with 20 µl of sinapinic acid matrix made in 30% CH3CN and 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid. Then, 1 µl of the mixture was dried on the sample stage and placed in the mass spectrometer.
Antigens. BSA (66.5 kDa; Sigma, St. Louis, MO) was dialyzed against pyrogen-free water, sterile filtered, and freeze-dried. rPA (83 kDa) from B. anthracis and rEPA (67 kDa) from P. aeruginosa were prepared and characterized (8, 21). Tetanus toxoid (TT) (150 kDa) was obtained from Merieux, Lyon, France.
DPGA was purified from the culture supernatant of B. anthracis strain A34 toxin-negative by cetavlon precipitation, acidification to pH 1.5, precipitation with ethanol, and passage through a 2.5- by 100-cm Sephacryl S-1000 column in 0.2 M NaCl (26). Its structure was confirmed by 1H nuclear magnetic resonance and 13C nuclear magnetic resonance, and its enantiomeric composition was determined by GLC-MS spectroscopy.
DPGA peptides were synthesized by the method of Merrifield (AnaSpec, San Jose, CA). Peptides were divided into groups depending on the types of linkages through which they were bound to proteins: (i) thioether linkage, NAc-
DPGA10-Gly3-L-Cys-CONH2 (
DPGA10-Cys) or NBrAc-Gly3-
DPGA10-COOH (Br-
DPGA10); (ii) hydrazone linkage, 4-formylbenzoyl-Gly3-
DPGA10-COOH (CHO-
DPGA10), NAc-
DPGA10-Gly3-CO-NH-NH-CO-(CH2)4-CO-NH-NH2 (
DPGA10-AH), or NAc-
DPGA15-CO-NH-NH-CO-(CH2)4-CO-NH-NH2 (
DPGA15-AH), where AH is adipic acid hydrazide; and (iii) oxime linkage, 4-formylbenzoyl-Gly3-
DPGA10-COOH (CHO-PGA10).
Conjugation. (i) Thioether linkage.
First, protein was bromoacylated using succinimidyl 3-(bromoacetamido)propionate (SBAP) (Pierce, Rockford, IL) and reacted with peptides equipped with a terminal cysteine residue as reported previously (22) (protein/S-Cys-Gly3-
DPGA10-NAc, protein/S-Cys-
DPGA10-NAc, or protein/S-Cys-
DPGA15-NAc).
Second, protein was derivatized with an N-hydroxysuccinimide ester of 3-(2-pyridyldithio)propionic acid (SPDP) (Pierce, Rockford, IL) and reacted with bromoacylated peptide (22) (protein-S/Gly3-
DPGA10-COOH).
Third, sulfhydryl groups were introduced into the protein using 2-iminothiolane (ITL) (ScienceLab, Houston, TX). Protein (20 mg) was derivatized with 2.8 mg ITL in 1.5 ml of buffer A (PBS, 0.1% glycerol, 0.005 M EDTA, pH 7.4) for 60 min. Next, a solution of Br-
DPGA10 (35 mg) in 300 µl of 1 M K2HPO4 was added while the pH was maintained at 7.4 with the addition of 0.2 N NaOH at room temperature. After 90 min, the reaction mixture was passed through a Sepharose CL-6B column (1 by 120 cm) and eluted with 0.2 M NaCl. Fractions reacting with anti-protein and anti-
DPGA were pooled (protein-ITL/Gly3-
DPGA10-COOH).
(ii) Hydrazone linkage.
First, protein was derivatized with succinimidyl 4-formylbenzoate (SFB) (Solulink, San Diego, CA). To a solution of protein (30 mg) in 1.2 ml buffer A, SFB (7.5 mg) in 100 µl dimethyl sulfoxide was added and reacted for 2 h at pH 7.4. The product 4-formylbenzoyl-protein was passed through a Sephadex G-50 column (1 by 100 cm) in 0.2 M NaCl. Protein-containing fractions were pooled and assayed for the presence of benzaldehyde, antigenicity, and protein concentration. To 4-formylbenzoyl-protein (20 mg) in 1.25 ml buffer A, a solution of 15 mg of AH-
DPGA10 or AH-
DPGA15 in 200 µl 1 M K2HPO4 was added. The pH of the reaction mixture was adjusted to 7.4, and the mixture was incubated overnight at room temperature and then passed through a Sepharose CL-6B column as described above. Fractions reacting with anti-protein and anti-
DPGA were pooled and assayed (protein-SFB/AH-Gly3-
DPGA10-NAc or protein-SFB/AH-
DPGA15-NAc).
Second, derivatization of protein with adipic acid dihydrazide using a water-soluble carbodiimide was done as reported previously (23). The incorporation of hydrazide residues was 2 to 5% per protein. To protein-AH (20 mg) in 1.3 ml buffer A, a solution of 20 mg of CHO-
DPGA10 in 200 µl 1 M K2HPO4 was added. The pH was adjusted to 7.4, and the solution was incubated overnight at room temperature and then passed through a Sepharose CL-6B column as described above. Fractions reacting with anti-protein and anti-
DPGA were pooled and assayed (protein-AH/SFB-Gly3-
DPGA15-COOH).
(iii) Oxime linkage.
BSA was first bromoacylated with SBAP and then reacted with O-(3-thiolpropyl)hydroxylamine, a heterobifunctional aminooxy-thiol linker (11). To 20 mg of aminooxylated protein (protein-ONH2) in 1.3 ml buffer A, a solution of 20 mg of CHO-PGA in 200 µl 1 M K2HPO4 was added. The pH was adjusted to 7.4, and the mixture was incubated overnight at room temperature and then passed through a Sepharose CL-6B column as described above. Fractions reacting with anti-protein and anti-
DPGA were pooled and assayed (protein-ONH2/SFB-Gly3-
DPGA10-COOH).
Immunization.
All animal experiments were approved by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Animal Care and Use Committee. Five- to 6-week-old female NIH general-purpose mice were immunized subcutaneously three times at 2-week intervals with 2.5 µg
DPGA as a conjugate in 0.1 ml PBS. Groups of 10 were exsanguinated 7 days after the second or third injection (23). Controls received PBS.
Antibodies.
Serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (23). Nunc Maxisorb plates were coated with B. anthracis
DPGA, 20 µg/ml PBS, or 4 µg protein/ml PBS (determined by checkerboard titration). The plates were blocked with 0.5% BSA (or with 0.5% HSA for assay of BSA conjugates) in PBS for 2 h at room temperature. An MRX Dynatech reader was used. Antibody levels were calculated relative to standard sera: for
DPGA, a hyperimmune murine serum (22); for PA, a monoclonal antibody containing 4.7 mg antibody/ml (15); for BSA and rEPA, a pool of highest-titer sera obtained from mice immunized three times and assigned a value of 100 EU. The results were computed with an ELISA data-processing program provided by the Biostatistics and Information Management Branch, CDC (19). IgG levels are expressed as geometric means (GM).
Statistics. The Bonferroni multiple-comparison test was used for different groups of mice.
|
|
|---|
DPGA to protein carriers are illustrated in Fig. 1. The purity of the conjugates and the absence of free protein were confirmed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and by MALDI-TOF spectroscopy. The molar ratio of
DPGA to protein in conjugates, calculated by GLC-MS analysis, was based on the ratio of D-glutamic acid to L-glutamic acid in the conjugate and by the increase in molecular mass, measured by MALDI-TOF, of the conjugate compared to that of the protein derivatized with the appropriate linker.
![]() View larger version (12K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Examples of linkage types used for conjugation of poly- -D-glutamic acid ( DPGA) peptides to protein carriers. (A and B) Thioether linkage. (C) Oxime linkage. (D) Hydrazone linkage.
|
DPGA.
Conjugates varied in
DPGA chain length, density on the protein, carrier proteins, and types of linkage between
DPGA and the protein. Additional variables were the formulation and the dosage injected into mice. All conjugates reacted with anti-
DPGA and anti-protein sera with a line of identity. All conjugates were highly immunogenic in mice; most immune sera precipitated B. anthracis
DPGA by double immunodiffusion (results not shown).
To identify the most immunogenic conjugates, we compared the immunogenicities of new constructs with those reported previously (22). Our previous results showed that protein conjugates of 10-mers of
DPGA were more immunogenic than the conjugates of 5- or 20-mers (22). Here, we have used 10-mers with three glycine residues (Gly3-
DPGA10) at the end linked to protein as before and 10-mers (
DPGA10) and 15-mers (
DPGA15) without glycine to avoid the generation of antibodies to the glycine linker. There were no statistical differences in the anti-
DPGA levels between the conjugates of the three peptides after three injections (Table 1). For example, the two conjugates TT/Cys-
DPGA10 and TT/Cys-
DPGA15, having the same average density of
DPGA on the protein (16 chains), gave similar responses, irrespective of the peptide chain length (after the second injection, the TT/Cys-
DPGA10 GM was 6,868 and the TT/Cys-
DPGA15 GM was 6,547; after the third injection, the TT/Cys-
DPGA10 GM was 6,667 and the TT/Cys-
DPGA15 GM was 7,688). Conjugate TT/Cys-Gly3-
DPGA10, with an average density of 11
DPGA chains per protein, induced a lower level of antibodies after the second injection (GM = 421; P < 0.001), but after the third injection, the GM antibody level was similar to that of the conjugate without the glycine linker (GM = 7,762).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Density/immunogenicity relationships of conjugates prepared with 10- and 15-mers of DPGA bound to TT or rPAa
|
DPGA chain density on the protein on the conjugate's immunogenicity. The best responses were achieved with an average of 10 to 15 chains per protein. The antibody level induced by TT/Cys-
DPGA15 with 16 chains per protein (GM = 7,688) was significantly higher than that induced by TT-CHO/AH-
DPGA15 with 37 chains per protein (GM = 2,322; P < 0.001). Similarly, conjugate rPA-CHO/AH-
DPGA15 with 11 chains (GM = 5,225) induced a higher level of antibodies than the conjugate with an average of 5 chains per protein (GM = 315; P < 0.001) or rPA-CHO/AH-Gly3-
DPGA10 with 29 chains per protein (GM = 1,256; P < 0.001). There were no statistical differences between rPA-ITL/Br-Gly3-
DPGA10 with either 8 or 18 chains per protein and rPA/Cys-Gly3-
DPGA10 with 15 chains per protein.
A comparison of different linkage methods, including those tested previously (22), is presented in Table 2. The best results were obtained by thioether-linked conjugates created between thiolated protein with SPDP and bromoacylated
DPGA or, conversely, bromoacylated protein and SH-
DPGA. These antibody levels were significantly higher over thioether-linked conjugates created using 2-iminothiolane and over hydrazone-linked conjugates (rPA-SH/Br-Gly3-
DPGA10 [GM = 7,206] versus rPA-ITL/Br-Gly3-
DPGA10 [GM = 3,726; P < 0.05]; rPA-SH/Br-Gly3-
DPGA10 versus rPA-CHO/AH-
DPGA15 [GM = 3,004; P < 0.01]; rPA-SH/Br-Gly3-
DPGA10 versus rPA-AH/CHO-Gly3-
DPGA10 [GM = 2,478; P < 0.001]; rPA-Br/Cys-Gly3-
DPGA10 [GM = 5,822] versus rPA-CHO/AH-
DPGA15 [GM = 3,004; P < 0.05]; and rPA-Br/Cys-Gly3-
DPGA10 versus rPA-AH/CHO-Gly3-
DPGA10 [GM = 2,478; P < 0.05]). There were no statistically significant differences between the best thioether-linked conjugate (GM = 7,206) and the aminooxy-linked conjugate (GM = 4,257), but the higher level of antibodies and the ease with which the thioether bond is formed (one less step is required) make the first the better choice.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Conjugation method/immunogenicity relationships of conjugates prepared with a 10-mer of DPGA bound to rPAa
|
DPGA (rPA and TT versus BSA [P < 0.001]; rPA and TT versus rEPA [P < 0.01]; and rEPA versus BSA [no statistical difference]). Formulation of the vaccine with aluminum hydroxide significantly increased the antibody response to the carrier protein with minimal significant effect upon the response to
DPGA (Table 4). In only one case (TT/Cys-
DPGA15) did the aluminum hydroxide significantly (P < 0.01) increase the response to
DPGA, rendering it the best conjugate, inducing 14,950 EU. The optimal dose of conjugated
DPGA was between 1.2 and 2.5 µg per mouse (Table 5). |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Protein carrier/immunogenicity relationships of conjugates prepared with a 10-mer of DPGA bound to BSA, rPA, rEPA, or TTa
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 4. Formulation/immunogenicity relationships of conjugates prepared with a 10-mer of DPGA bound to rPA or TTa
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 5. Dose/immunogenicity relationships of conjugates prepared with a 10-mer of DPGA bound to rPAa
|
DPGA in the conjugate. Overall, the highest levels were induced by conjugates prepared by thioether linkage between bromoacylated protein and peptide containing terminal cysteine formulated with aluminum hydroxide. The antibody response was directly related to the dosage of the carrier protein. |
|
|---|
DPGA capsule. The licensed vaccine against anthrax (Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed) contains the protective antigen, the binding component of the toxin complex (14). The protective effects of the anticapsular antibodies were investigated recently (3, 10, 22).
We have described the preparation of conjugates of synthetic
DPGA peptides with several carrier proteins bound through thioether linkages (22). Peptides of different lengths were used, at an average of 5 to 32 mol of peptide per mol of protein. Unlike
DPGA alone, these conjugates were immunogenic in 5- to 6-week old general-purpose mice when injected at a dosage and schedule relevant for use in humans, and the antibodies induced opsonophagocytic killing of B. anthracis. This finding was confirmed by others (27).
The conjugation techniques, including the types of chemical linkages between the hapten and the protein, as well as the peptide/sugar chain length and the density on the protein, influence the serum antibody response to both components (4, 13, 17, 18, 20). Therefore, we studied several constructs for human use by employing additional methods and formulations of the
DPGA conjugates. Previously, we created thioether bonds between the protein and the
DPGA by introduction of a bromoacyl group (SBAP) or a thiol group (SPDP) into the protein. The activated protein was then bound to a peptide with a thiol or bromoacetyl group at its N or C terminus, respectively. In the present study, we tested (i) thioether bonds generated by derivatization of the protein with thiol groups using 2-iminothiolane, followed by binding to bromoacetyl-peptide; (ii) hydrazone bonds generated by derivatizing the proteins with adipic acid dihydrazide, followed by reaction with benzaldehyde-derivatized peptides or, alternatively, a benzaldehyde group was introduced into the protein using SFB and the formylated protein bound to a hydrazide-derivatized peptide; (iii) oxime bonds created by derivatization of the protein with SBAP, which was then coupled to an aminoxy-thiol linker; the aminooxylated protein was then bound to 4-formylbenzoyl-
DPGA. The immunogenicities of these conjugates in mice were similar to those previously prepared: the optimal density was
15 mol
DPGA per mol protein with a peptide chain length of 10 or 15 amino acids. Tetanus toxoid and rPA were better carriers than BSA or rEPA. The most successful and reproducible linkage was formed by introduction of bromoacetyl groups onto the lysine residues of the protein, followed by conjugation with
DPGA equipped with a terminal cysteine residue. A dosage of 1.2 to 2.5 µg of conjugated
DPGA per mouse gave the best
DPGA response. Aluminum hydroxide should be included in the formulation if a high response to rPA or to another carrier protein is needed.
The choice of an anthrax conjugate to be further studied can be evaluated by (i) its immunogenicity, (ii) its yield, and (iii) the ease of preparation. Based on our studies, a highly immunogenic and simple-to-prepare investigational vaccine, inducing antibody to either one
DPGA only (TT/Cys-
DPGA15) or two anthrax virulence factors,
DPGA and PA (rPA/Cys-Gly3-
DPGA10), can be prepared and considered for clinical testing.
We thank Vince Pozsgay for synthesizing the oxime linker and Chunyan Gou for technical assistance.
|
|
|---|
-D-glutamic acid protein conjugates induce IgG antibodies in mice to the capsule of Bacillus anthracis: a potential addition to the anthrax vaccine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:8945-8950.This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»