Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, September 2006, p. 5408-5413, Vol. 74, No. 9
0019-9567/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/IAI.01840-05
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
,
Valerie Burland,2,
Rogéria Keller,1
Debra J. Rose,2
Adam T. Boutin,2,||
Sara A. Klink,2,#
Frederick R. Blattner,2 and
James B. Kaper1*
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Center for Vaccine Development, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201,1 Laboratory of Genetics and Genome Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 537062
Received 10 November 2005/ Returned for modification 4 January 2006/ Accepted 19 June 2006
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The large plasmid pMAR2, the first genetic element implicated in EPEC disease, is present in the prototypic EPEC strain E2348/69 (O127:H6) (2). Adherence of EPEC to HEp-2 epithelial cells and in vivo adherence to piglet intestinal epithelium was shown to be dependent on this self-transmissible plasmid. Transfer of this plasmid to a nonadherent E. coli K-12 strain conferred the ability to adhere to epithelial cells. Of 32 adherent strains with classical EPEC serotypes, 31 possessed similar large plasmids, subsequently named EAF for EPEC adherence factor plasmids. Adult volunteers developed diarrhea in nine of ten cases challenged with wild-type E2348/69 (13) but in only two of nine controls who ingested the plasmid-cured derivative. Antibodies to an outer membrane protein expressed by the parent strain were detected after treatment with wild type but not the plasmid-cured derivative. Expression of the protein, later identified as intimin (11), was also linked to the plasmid. A 1-kb region of pMAR2, called the EAF probe, was the first molecular diagnostic tool for EPEC (19).
The type IV pilus named the bundle-forming pilus (BFP) (8) encoded in a 14-gene locus, was the first virulence factor to be identified for the EAF plasmid (24, 25). The rope-like filaments of BFP connect EPEC bacteria into microcolonies in a pattern called localized adherence. A regulatory locus, per (plasmid-encoded regulator) (10), was shown to activate expression of the chromosomal eae gene encoding intimin. One of the three per open reading frames (ORFs), perA, encodes an AraC-family transcriptional activator (10). Tobe et al. reported that this locus (called bfpTWV in their study) also activates expression of the bfp genes (28). In studies with isogenic bfpA and perA mutants, experiments with human volunteers showed that PerA and BFP contribute to diarrhea and are therefore important in virulence (3).
Two divergent clonal groups exist among EPEC strains containing the EAF plasmid, designated EPEC1 and EPEC2 (22, 30, 31), distinguished by multilocus enzyme electrophoresis analysis of allelic differences among housekeeping genes. The EPEC1 group includes widespread serotypes such as O55:H6 and O119:H6, whereas EPEC 2 consists of serotypes with more limited occurrence such as O111:H2 and O114:H2. Strains that possess the LEE but lack the EAF plasmid are termed typical EPEC (20) and are found in developing countries, whereas EPEC that lack the EAF plasmid, called atypical EPEC, predominate in industrialized countries (29). Whittam and coworkers showed that horizontal transfer of the EAF plasmid, insertion of the LEE into different chromosomal sites, acquisition of Shiga toxin-encoding bacteriophage, and transfer of an EHEC virulence plasmid all contributed to the evolution of EPEC and EHEC strains (22).
Plasmid sequencing and analysis.
The DNA sequence of the EAF plasmid from an EPEC2 strain, B171 (O111:NM), was previously determined (27). Plasmid pB171 is 69 kb in length, which is considerably smaller than the
95-kb EPEC1 plasmid pMAR2 (2). No genes encoding DNA transfer functions (tra) were found in pB171, an observation at variance with the fact that EPEC1 EAF plasmids are self-transmissible. To compare the EPEC1 and EPEC2 plasmids, we determined and analyzed the complete nucleotide sequence of the EAF plasmid from E2348/69. The sequenced plasmid pMAR7 was derived from the native plasmid pMAR2 by transposition of Tn801 from plasmid pMR5 (2) to provide a selectable marker, ampicillin resistance. Annotations were assigned using ASAP (for "a systematic annotation package") (9), and the annotated sequence was deposited in GenBank under accession number DQ388534. Protein coding sequences are in Tables S1 and S2 in the supplemental material, and the fully annotated sequences are accessible via the Enteropathogen Resource Integration Center-Bioinformatics Resource Center (ERIC-BRC/ASAP) database (http://www.ericbrc.org/portal/eric/). The circular map shown in Fig. 1 consists of 101,558 bp containing 115 protein-coding ORFs and one regulatory RNA gene, finP. Genes shared by pMAR7 and pB171 are colinear. For 90 ORFs (78%), putative functions could be assigned; 8 ORFs with experimental evidence of expression had no known function (uncharacterized proteins), and the remaining 17 ORFs were similar to conserved hypothetical proteins. Unique identifiers (MAR###) were assigned to each ORF.
![]() View larger version (36K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Map of pMAR7. Outer circle, ORFs, and their orientations color coded by functional category: red, known or putative virulence-associated proteins; pink, conjugal DNA transfer; yellow, IS-related or transposase fragments; orange, intact IS or transposase; blue, plasmid replication, maintenance, or other DNA metabolic functions; green, conserved hypothetical; purple, Tn801 insertion associated; white, pseudogenes. The inner circle shows the scale in base pairs. Individual gene descriptions are available online (see Table S1 in the supplemental material) or in the ERIC-BRC ASAP database (https://ericbrc.org/asap). The three replication regions, oriT, and the EAF probe are indicated. The figure was generated using the program Genvision (DNASTAR, Madison, WI).
|
Intact tra region. A segment of 50 ORFs in pMAR7 is absent from pB171 (Table S1 in the supplemental material). Thirty-eight of these ORFs are very similar in genetic organization and sequence to the tra regions responsible for conjugal transfer in plasmids F and R100 (1). The transfer regions of F, R100, and pMAR7 are compared in Fig. 2. All 36 genes of the 33.3-kb F-transfer system (7) are present in pMAR7 and are apparently complete and functional. The 3' end of the pMAR7 operon, however, has unique sequence similarity to plasmid R100. In nearly all other differences between the R100 and F tra regions, pMAR7 more closely resembles the F plasmid, the pMAR7 proteins being 70 to 100% identical to F proteins except TrbJ (66%), TraQ (58%), and TraS (25% identity with F but 83% with R100).
![]() View larger version (37K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Transfer operons of the pMAR7, R100, and F plasmids. The transfer operons of plasmid R100 (A) plasmid F (B), and pMAR7 (C) are compared. Orientation of the ORFs is that in pMAR7. Transcription proceeds from right to left; tra genes are in uppercase, trb genes are in lowercase, and antisense RNA finP is indicated above the lines. ORFs are not to scale. (D) Comparison of putative oriT region of conjugative plasmids aligned at nic site (arrow) according to Frost et al. (7). Sequences were aligned by CLUSTAL W and highlighted by Boxshade. Source or reference for sequences: pMAR7 (the present study); R100 (NC_002134), F (NC_002483), R64 (AB027308), p307 (X06534), pSU233 (X55896).
|
An unusual feature of the pMAR7 tra region is that it is flanked by two previously unreported IS4 family elements (14) designated ISEc13 that are nearly identical and in inverse orientations (Fig. 3). Their inverted repeats of 23 and 21 nucleotides are very similar to ISPlu9 and IS50. No direct repeats were observed. These elements appear to form an unusual Tn5-like composite transposon. Although there has never been a report of a Tn5 containing a sequence as large as the tra region (W. Reznikoff, unpublished data), the possibility remains that the IS-bracketed region could be transposed as an intact unit or island.
![]() View larger version (13K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. ISEc13 flanking tra region of pMAR7. The outer end (OE) 19-bp terminal inverted repeat begins 165 bp upstream of the ORF (MAR042 and MAR082). The transposase TGA stop codon is within the 19-bp inner end (IE).
|
The hybridization results enabled strains to be assigned to different classes (Table 1) . For class I strains, all probes were positive, indicating that they were EAF+, TRA1-4+, and finO/tnp+, suggesting that these strains possessed pMAR7-like plasmids. This class included EPEC1 serotypes O127:H6, O55:H6, and O142:H34 (47 strains). Class II strains, also from EPEC1, were EAF and TRA2-4+ but were negative for the TRA1 and finO/tnp probes. The serotypes belonging to class II were O142:H6 and O119:H6, which also contained bpfA sequences that were more divergent than those found in other EPEC1 strains (4). Class III represented EAF+ TRA4 strains lacking oriT. The majority of strains in this group (23 of 27 tested) were negative for TRA probes, but 4 were positive for TRA2 and TRA3. O111:H2 and O111:H serotypes were found in both groups of class III. Class IV strains were EAF- and finO/tnp-negative but TRA3/4 positive and either positive or negative for TRA1/2. These are atypical EPEC strains (lacking EAF sequences) and presumably were nonconjugative despite the presence of oriT; the colony hybridization technique would not distinguish chromosomal versus plasmid-borne TRA3/4 sequences. Class V strains were negative for all probes. These strains were atypical EPEC whose serotypes overlapped with class IV. The presence or absence of the intact tra region is consistent with reports (2, 16) that O127:H7 (class I) strains contained self-transmissible EAF plasmids, whereas EAF plasmids in O142:H6 (class II) and O111:H2 (class III) strains were not self-transmissible. We also examined a number of EHEC strains and found only partial, if any, tra regions. O157:H7 strains tested were negative for all TRA probes, while some (but not all) O26:H11, O111:H8, and O111:H strains reacted with TRA1 to TRA4 but not tnp-finO.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Summary of tra region hybridization analysis of EPEC strains
|
![]() View larger version (22K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. (A) G+C content of pMAR7. The G+C percentage (sliding window) is plotted against the sequence position. Regions with low G+C content, bfp, per, toxB, gad, and the transfer region are indicated. The scale is in kilobases. (B) Comparison of pMAR7 and pB171. Marked pMAR7 segments are aligned with the G+C content diagram, and homologous pB171 regions are indicated with similar patterns. IS elements flanking the tra genes are indicated with vertical checked bars. pB171-specific ORFs are indicated by vertical hash bars with ORF numbers below the bar. The toxB fragments and flanking IS3 ORFs in pB171 are ORFs 34 to 38.
|
Concluding comments. Sequence comparison of two prototypic EPEC virulence plasmids revealed an EAF plasmid backbone and nearly identical bfp and per virulence loci. The intact tra region in pMAR7 distinguishes it from pB171, along with 16 pB171 ORFs absent from pMAR7. The tra region is limited to strains of the EPEC1 clonal group, although partial tra sequences were detected in EPEC1, EPEC2, and atypical EPEC strains. The ISEc13 elements flanking the tra genes in pMAR7 suggest that the tra segment might be mobile, possibly acquired by transposition from an F-like plasmid. Subsequently, the region could have mediated the transfer of the entire EAF plasmid to other E. coli strains. Conversely, the IS elements provide targets for homologous recombination by which EAF plasmids might have lost some or all of the tra genes by deletion. This scenario is consistent with the hypothesis of Whittam and McGraw (30) that EPEC1 strains were the reservoir for the emergence of EPEC2. Intact tra genes would have enabled the EAF plasmid to disseminate among diarrheagenic E. coli.
This study was supported by Public Health Service grants AI-21657 (J.B.K.), AI-44387 (F.R.B. and V.B.), and HSSN26620040040C from NIH/NIAID (ERIC-BRC project) and by the U.S. Army Medical Command (C.B.).
The views expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the Department of the Army or Department of Defense.
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://iai.asm.org/. ![]()
C.B. and V.B. contributed equally to this study. ![]()
Present address: Department of Enteric Infections, Division of Communicable Diseases and Immunology, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD 20910. ![]()
|| Present address: Molecular Biology Section, Division of Biological Sciences, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093. ![]()
# Present address: Promega Corp., 2800 Woods Hollow Road, Madison, WI 53711. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»