| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
,
Marianne Baricevic,1,2,3,
Hemalatha Saidasan,1,3 and
Nilgun E. Tumer1,2,3*
Biotechnology Center for Agriculture and the Environment,1 Graduate Program in Molecular Biosciences,2 Department of Plant Biology and Pathology, Cook College, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901-85203
Received 11 August 2006/ Returned for modification 22 September 2006/ Accepted 13 October 2006
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-sarcin/ricin loop in the large
rRNA. Very little is known about how ricin interacts with ribosomes and
the molecular mechanism by which it kills cells. To gain insight to the
mechanism of ricin-induced cell death, we set up yeast
(Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as a simple and genetically
tractable system to isolate mutants defective in cytotoxicity.
Ribosomes were depurinated in yeast cells expressing the precursor form
of the A chain of ricin (pre-RTA), and these cells displayed apoptotic
markers such as nuclear fragmentation, chromatin condensation, and
accumulation of reactive oxygen species. We conducted a large-scale
mutagenesis of pre-RTA and isolated a panel of nontoxic RTA mutants
based on their inability to kill yeast cells. Several nontoxic RTA
mutants depurinated ribosomes and inhibited translation to the same
extent as wild-type RTA in vivo. The mutant proteins isolated from
yeast depurinated ribosomes in vitro, indicating that they were
catalytically active. However, cells expressing these mutants did not
display hallmarks of apoptosis. These results provide the first
evidence that the ability to depurinate ribosomes and inhibit
translation does not always correlate with ricin-mediated cell death,
indicating that ribosome depurination and translation inhibition do not
account entirely for the cytotoxicity of
ricin. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-sarcin/ricin loop (SRL) of the large rRNA
(7,
8,
41). They consist of a
catalytic A chain covalently joined by a disulfide bond to a cell
binding B chain and are highly toxic to eukaryotic cells
(13,
34,
41). Ricin naturally
exists in the seeds of Ricinus communis (castor bean), a plant
native to Asia, the Middle East, and southern Europe
(13,
34). The B chain of ricin
(RTB) is a lectin that binds galactose or
N-acetylgalactosamine receptors on the surface of target cells
and promotes subsequent endocytosis of the A chain (RTA)
(13,
34). RTA is an
N-glycosidase that depurinates ribosomes in the cytosol by
removing a specific adenine (A4324 in rat 28S rRNA) from the highly
conserved SRL in the large rRNA
(7,
8). The depurination of
the SRL has been reported to interfere with the elongation factor
1-dependent binding of amino acyl-tRNA to the ribosome as well as the
GTP-dependent binding of elongation factor 2 and to inhibit protein
synthesis at the translocation step
(27,
35). Since ricin and many
other AB toxins are quite stable, one or a few molecules are sufficient
to kill cells (13). RTA
has been widely used in cancer therapy as the active moiety of
immunotoxins selectively targeted to cancer cells
(5). Very little is known about the relationship between ribosome depurination and the cytotoxicity of ricin. There is evidence that ricin induces apoptosis in a wide variety of animal cells by mechanisms other than protein synthesis inhibition (32). Ricin-induced apoptosis in HeLa cells was associated with oxidative stress, glutathione depletion, and activation of the caspase 3 cascade, followed by downstream events leading to apoptotic cell death (32, 39).
In the castor bean, ricin A and B chains are encoded by a single gene, which is translated into a preproprotein of 576 amino acids. The ricin precursor consists of a 35-residue N-terminal extension which contains the signal sequence (13). The mature RTA, which consists of 267 residues, is joined to the 262-residue mature RTB by a 12-residue linker peptide (13). The signal peptide directs the protein into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), where proricin is core glycosylated and disulfide bonds are formed within the protein (13). Four disulfide bonds form within the RTB sequence, and the fifth one joins RTA with RTB in the ricin holotoxin. After RTB binds to its receptor on the surface of animal cells, a portion of the endocytosed RTA reaches the Golgi complex. RTA undergoes retrograde transport from the Golgi to the ER and is thought to enter the cytosol from the ER (23).
Due to its potent cytotoxicity and wide availability, ricin has been exploited as a biological weapon and an agent of bioterrorism (2, 19) and has been classified as a level B biothreat by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Inhalation of small amounts of ricin aerosol can rapidly and irreversibly damage cells of the respiratory tract, leading to severe pulmonary incapacitation or death (3, 12). Currently, there is no approved antidote, vaccine, or other specific medical treatment option for ricin exposure. Since the wild-type RTA is highly toxic to humans, nontoxic recombinant vaccines need to be developed based on detailed understanding of the structure and molecular mechanism of action of ricin. Since several immunodominant human T- and B-cell epitopes map to the region surrounding the active site of RTA (6, 43), nontoxic forms which contain mutations outside the active site may lead to the development of safe and effective vaccines. A promising recombinant attenuated vaccine which contains two point mutations in RTA, one at a substrate binding site and another at a vascular leak syndrome-inducing site, is in clinical trials (46).
The search for residues critical for enzymatic activity has been carried out by expressing mutated RTA in Escherichia coli, followed by the subsequent analysis of in vitro enzymatic activity. By passaging the plasmid containing the mature RTA through an E. coli mutator strain, five different mutations were identified from residues at the active-site cleft, including Glu177, Trp211, Gly212, and Ser215, which are located on the same helix, and Ile252, which is located close to the C-terminal end(10). Recently, another large-scale mutagenesis screen was conducted using error-prone PCR of the mature RTA (1). While these studies identified several residues essential for enzymatic activity, the correlation between ribosome depurination and cytotoxicity has not been addressed. Here, we conducted a large-scale mutagenesis of the precursor form of RTA (pre-RTA) in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and isolated mutant forms of RTA based on their inability to kill yeast cells. The nontoxic RTA mutants were characterized with respect to their ability to depurinate ribosomes, inhibit translation, and cause cell death. To gain insight into the mechanism of ricin-induced cell death, we examined the hallmarks of apoptosis in cells expressing the wild-type form and the nontoxic forms of RTA. Apoptotic markers, such as chromatin condensation, nuclear fragmentation, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, were observed for yeast expressing the wild-type RTA but not for cells expressing the nontoxic mutants, even though they depurinated ribosomes and inhibited translation. These results provide evidence that ribosome depurination and translation inhibition are not sufficient for the cytotoxicity of ricin.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Mutagenesis of pre-RTA. Plasmid DNA mutagenesis was carried out as previously described (16). Briefly, the pre-RTA plasmid was incubated with 7% hydroxylamine for 20 h at 37°C and then precipitated and transformed into yeast. Yeast cells were plated onto SD-Leu supplemented with 2% glucose and replica plated onto SD-Leu containing 2% galactose. The pre-RTA plasmid was isolated from the colonies, which were able to grow on galactose and retransformed into yeast to confirm that the resistance was due to the plasmid. Plasmids isolated from colonies expressing RTA were characterized by sequence analysis.
Analysis of pre-RTA expression. Yeast cells harboring the pre-RTA plasmid were grown on SD-Leu containing 2% glucose to an A600 of 0.3. Cells were pelleted at 2,000 x g for 5 min, resuspended in SD-Leu medium containing 2% galactose, and grown for 6 h to induce RTA expression. For immunoblot analysis, ER membrane fractions were isolated as previously described (36). The membrane fraction was dissolved in sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) buffer and heated at 37°C for 10 min before loading onto a 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. The blots were probed using polyclonal anti-RTA antibodies (1:3,000) produced in rabbits (Covance Research Products, Denver, PA). The blots were then stripped for 30 to 45 min with 8 M guanidine hydrochloride and reprobed with antibody to dolichol-phosphate mannose synthase (Dpm1p; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) (1:4,000). Glycosylated and deglycosylated purified RTA standard was obtained from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO).
Analysis of growth rate. Yeast cells were grown in SD-Leu medium containing 2% glucose to an A600 of 0.3 and were then transferred to SD-Leu containing 2% galactose. Aliquots were taken every 2 h, and the A600 was recorded. Doubling times were calculated based on exponential growth between 4 and 10 h postinduction.
Cell viability analysis. Yeast cells expressing pre-RTA or pre-RTA mutants were grown on SD-Leu containing 2% glucose to an A600 of 0.3 and then transferred to SD-Leu medium containing 2% galactose to induce pre-RTA expression. A serial dilution of cells was plated on SD-Leu plates containing 2% glucose at 0, 4, 6, 10, and 12 h postinduction. Plates were incubated at 30°C for approximately 48 h.
rRNA depurination assay.
Dual primer extension
analysis was conducted to quantify rRNA depurination as previously
described (37). Briefly,
2 µg of total yeast RNA from cells expressing RTA was
hybridized with 106 cpm of end-labeled depurination primer
(5'-AGCGGATGGTGCTTCGCGGCAATG-3').
The second primer hybridized upstream of the depurination site close to
the 5' end of the 25S rRNA. To quantify the extent of
depurination, the target RNA was initially hybridized in the presence
of excess amounts (700 pmol) of the two
[
-32P]ATP-end-labeled negative-strand primers. The
depurination primer described above annealed 73 nucleotides (nt)
3' of the depurination site (A3137) on the 25S rRNA.
The 25S control primer
(5'-TTCACTCGCCGTTACTAAGG-3')
annealed 100 nt 3' of the 25S rRNA 5' end. To allow for
accurate quantification, the labeled 25S control primer was diluted 1:4
with unlabeled 25S control primer. Superscript II reverse
transcriptase was used in the primer extension assay as
described above. Extension products for the control and depurination
fragments (100 nt and 73 nt, respectively) were separated on a 7 M
urea-5% polyacrylamide denaturing gel and visualized and
quantified on a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA). The
amount of total yeast RNA and rRNA used was previously determined to be
in the linear range of
detection.
Extraction of proteins from yeast and in vitro depurination assay. Yeast cells (50 ml) containing pre-RTA or nontoxic mutants were induced on galactose for 6 h. Cells were resuspended in 1x low-salt buffer (20 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.6, 100 mM potassium acetate, 5 mM magnesium acetate, 1 mM EDTA, 2 mM dithiothreitol, and 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) and lysed using glass beads. Samples were centrifuged briefly to remove cell debris and glass beads. The supernatant was transferred to a new tube and centrifuged at 100,000 x g for 30 min to remove cell membranes and ribosomes. The resulting supernatant (100 µl) was collected. Yeast ribosomes were isolated as previously described (44). Yeast ribosomes (15 µl) were incubated with RTA protein extracted from yeast (10 µl) in 10x RIP buffer (600 mM KCl, 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, and 100 mM MgCl2) at 30°C for 30 min (44). One hundred microliters of 2x extraction buffer (240 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.8, 20 mM EDTA, and 2% SDS) was added, and rRNA was extracted with phenol:chloroform and precipitated with ethanol. The rRNA was analyzed using the dual primer extension assay (37) as described above.
In vivo [35S]methionine incorporation. Translation inhibition was measured by in vivo [35S]methionine incorporation. Yeast cells were grown to an A600 of 0.3 in SD-Leu-Met containing 2% glucose. Cells were then resuspended in SD-Leu-Met containing 2% galactose for 6 h to induce the expression of either wild-type pre-RTA or the mutant forms. At time zero, [35S]methionine was added to induced cells. After 30 min, 400 µl of yeast cells was removed for growth measurements, and additional aliquots of 400 µl were assayed for methionine incorporation in duplicate as previously described (37). The cpm was normalized to the A600 reading, and rates of translation were determined as cpm/A600/minute. Final results were displayed as percentages of total translation in yeast harboring the empty vector.
ROS production, cell death, and nuclear fragmentation.
Yeast cells were sampled at 0, 2, 4,
6, 10, and 24 h postinduction, stained with 0.05% Evans blue
for 30 min, and then destained with water for 10 min. Cells were
counted using a Zeiss Axiovert 200 inverted microscope. The percentage
of cell death was calculated by counting
800 total cells as
described by Xu et al.
(47). All experiments
were assayed in triplicate.
To detect nuclear fragmentation, cells were resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline buffer (20 mM sodium phosphate, 140 mM NaCl, pH 7.4) and stained with DAPI (4',4-diaminido-2-phenylindole) (1 µg/ml) for 5 min at room temperature. After being stained, cells were washed with water five times and observed under a Zeiss Axiovert 200 inverted microscope with the epifluorescence setting. The digital images were acquired with a Zeiss Axiocam digital camera and software for image archival and management (Axiovision 3.0; Carl Zeiss Vision GmbH). ROS staining was carried out with diaminobenzidine (DAB) (1 mg/ml) for 10 min and was followed by washing with water three times (42). The stained cells were observed under a Zeiss Axiovert 200 inverted microscope as described above.
Intracellular production of H2O2 was detected using the oxidant-sensitive probe 2',7'-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCDHF-DA) (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) (4). Two microliters of fresh 5 mM DCDHF-DA was added to 1 ml of yeast cell culture (107 cells) and incubated at 28°C for 30 min. The cells were then washed twice in sterile distilled water and resuspended in 1 ml of 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5. After 20 µl of chloroform and 10 µl of 0.1% SDS were added, the cells were incubated for 15 min and pelleted. The fluorescence of the supernatant was measured using an HTS700 Perkin Elmer bioassay reader (Wellesley, MA) with excitation at 490 nm and emission at 518 nm.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
Pre-RTA mutants are not toxic to yeast cells. Irreversible growth inhibition was examined by conducting viability assays. Cells expressing pre-RTA or the nontoxic mutants were plated on glucose after induction in galactose for the indicated times (Fig. 2). Upon induction in yeast, the wild-type RTA reduced the viability of cells by almost 3 logs at 10 h (Fig. 2, top panel). In contrast, the nontoxic RTA mutants exhibited minimal loss of viability at 10 h postinduction. All nontoxic mutants analyzed exhibited viability similar to that seen with cells harboring the empty vector. Only the L248stop mutant in group I and the P250L + 1 mutant in group II are shown because they had the shortest deletions at their C termini. The two double mutants, the P95L-E145K and P250L-A253V mutants, were nontoxic and did not reduce viability. However, the single mutants corresponding to each double mutant (the P95L, E145K, P250L, and A253V mutants) reduced the viability of yeast cells (Fig. 2).
|
|
|
Cell growth rate does not always correlate with ribosome depurination.
The rate of growth was measured by
examining the doubling time of the mutants. As shown in Table
1, the doubling time of
cells expressing pre-RTA was 18 h, while cells harboring the
vector had a doubling time of 6.3 h. The doubling times of
cells expressing the E177K active-site mutant or the nontoxic G140R and
I184 mutants were longer than that of cells harboring the
empty vector, even though these mutants did not depurinate ribosomes
(Fig. 3C) or inhibit translation. Although ribosomes were depurinated
and translation was inhibited in cells expressing the P95L-E145K double
mutant, the doubling time of cells expressing this mutant (10 h) was
similar to the doubling time of cells expressing the E177K active-site
mutant (9.8 h). In contrast, the doubling time of cells expressing the
S215F mutant (15 h), which depurinated ribosomes and inhibited
translation, was similar to that of cells expressing the wild-type
pre-RTA, although this mutant was nontoxic. These results demonstrated
that the rate of growth of RTA mutants did not always correlate with
the extent of ribosome depurination, indicating that the reduction in
growth is not entirely due to ribosome
depurination.
Characteristic markers of apoptosis are observed for cells expressing the pre-RTA. The previous results indicated that the reduction in growth observed for cells expressing pre-RTA was not entirely due to ribosome depurination or translation inhibition. To assess whether cell death induced by the expression of pre-RTA was accompanied by morphological features of apoptosis, we examined apoptotic markers in yeast expressing several RTA mutants. Cells expressing the wild-type pre-RTA, the S215F mutant, and the P95L-E145K mutant were analyzed, since these mutants depurinated ribosomes at similar levels. Cells expressing the E177K active-site mutant and the double P250L-A253V mutant were used as negative controls, since these mutants were not toxic and did not depurinate ribosomes. The single mutants corresponding to each double mutant were used as positive controls, since they were toxic and depurinated ribosomes.
Cells growing in liquid culture were stained with Evans blue at different times after induction. The extent of staining at 24 h postinduction is shown in Fig. 5A and is quantified in Fig. 5B. In cells expressing the wild-type pre-RTA or the toxic mutants, cell death was observed at 6 h after induction and gradually increased up to 24 h (Fig. 5A and B; also, see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). In contrast, minimal loss of cell viability was observed for cells expressing the nontoxic mutants or for cells harboring the empty vector up to 24 h after induction (Fig. 5A and B; also, see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). These results correlated well with the viability assay results (Fig. 2).
|
The accumulation of ROS is a significant trigger of apoptosis in yeast (25). To determine whether yeast cell death induced by ricin is accompanied by the production of ROS, cells were stained with DAB and visualized under a Zeiss Axiovert 200 inverted microscope at 24 h postinduction (Fig. 6). In cells expressing the nontoxic mutants or harboring the vector, there was no staining for ROS up to 24 h postinduction (Fig. 6A; also, see Fig. S3 in the supplemental material). In contrast, DAB staining became visible at 6 h after induction in cells expressing pre-RTA or the toxic E145K, P250L, and A253V mutants and increased up to 24 h (see Fig. S3 in the supplemental material). These results suggested that expression of the wild-type pre-RTA resulted in increased ROS accumulation and promoted apoptosis-like cell death in yeast.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In a recent study using PCR-based mutagenesis of the mature RTA gene, 80% of the changes observed were T-to-C and A-to-G transitions (1). In contrast, 80% of the changes observed in our study using chemical mutagenesis were either C-to-T or G-to-A transitions (Table 2). Multiple mutations were obtained with the PCR-based mutagenesis, and single mutations had to be generated to determine if they were responsible for the phenotype (1). In contrast, only 2 of the 35 mutants generated in our study using hydroxylamine contained double mutations (Table 1). Analysis of the single point mutant constructs corresponding to each double point mutant indicated that both mutations were necessary for the loss of cytotoxicity.
Of the nine frameshift mutations isolated here, seven were caused by a single base pair deletion. Two had deletions of two base pairs and were isolated only once. The 25 mutations with stop codons or single amino acid changes were caused by single base pair changes. Most of these mutations were isolated more than twice, and some were isolated nine times from different plates, indicating that the mutation screen using hydroxylamine was saturated. The codons encoding 11 out of the 14 glutamines in pre-RTA were changed to stop codons, providing further evidence that our mutation screen was saturated. Mutations were not isolated at positions corresponding to Gln5, Gln98, and Gln266, since changing the codon encoding Gln5 to a stop codon would result in a four-amino-acid peptide that would not be detected by immunoblot analysis. Changing the codon encoding Gln266 to a stop codon would not affect the cytotoxicity of RTA (18); thus, a mutant with this characteristic would not have been isolated by our screen. Therefore, the only mutation in a Gln residue codon not isolated here was the change of a codon encoding Gln98 into a stop codon, which would encode a nontoxic form of RTA.
Mutations were not isolated in the N-terminal extension of pre-RTA, suggesting that these mutations did not affect the cytotoxicity of RTA. A mutation in the N-terminal extension may disrupt the ability of pre-RTA to translocate through the ER membrane without affecting its cytotoxicity, since expression of the mature RTA is toxic to yeast (1). Similarly, mutations were not recovered at Asn10 and Asn236, which are glycosylated in the mature RTA. These results provide further evidence that glycosylation does not affect the cytotoxicity of RTA (33).
The
three-dimensional X-ray structure of ricin indicates that the
amino-terminal 117 residues form six ß-strands and two
-helices (28).
The central domain is made up of five helices, of which the longest,
helix E, runs through the center of the molecule and contains the key
active-site residues, Glu177 and Arg180
(28). The third domain
consists of a two-stranded antiparallel ß-sheet and an
-helix, which is anchored to the first helix in the N-terminal
domain. It forms part of the active-site cleft and interacts with RTB
in the holotoxin
(28).
The results
from three separate random mutagenesis studies and several systematic
deletion experiments indicate that there are five regions important for
the function of RTA: ß-strand D;
-helices D, E, and G
to H; and a hydrogen-bonded turn and ß-strand
region (Ile249 to Val256) close to the C-terminal end of the protein
(Fig.
7) (1,
10,
18,
31). The
-helix
E contains the active-site residues, Glu177 and Arg180. The E177K
mutation was isolated several times in different studies
(1,
10). Mutations in Arg180
(R180G) (1) in helix E and
Ile184 (
I184)
(31) at the beginning of
helix F disrupted the enzymatic activity of RTA in vitro, emphasizing
the critical nature of this region. In our study, deletion of Ile184
led to a loss of cytotoxicity and ribosome depurination in vivo (Table
1). Ile184 may be critical
for ribosome depurination, since it contacts Phe181 and methylene
carbons of Glu177, stabilizing the active center
(31).
|
-helices G to H. Several mutations in this region,
including those at Glu208 and Gly212, reduced the depurination activity
and the cytotoxicity of RTA (Table
1). Previous studies
indicated that Glu208, which is at the bottom of the active-site cleft,
can substitute for Glu177 in the E177A mutant
(11). Deletion of Gly212
led to the loss of enzymatic activity of RTA in vitro
(31). In contrast, the
point mutation at Ser215 (S215F) in helix H did not affect the ribosome
depurination in vivo but significantly decreased the cytotoxicity of
RTA (Table 1 and Fig.
3). Previous studies
showed that Ser215 could be deleted from RTA without a complete loss of
enzymatic activity in vitro
(30). These results
indicated that the role of Ser215 in cytotoxicity could be separated
from its role in ribosome depurination.
The
-helix D
crosses helix E in the middle (Fig.
7). Each of the amino
acids in helix D could be singly deleted, provided that the deletion
does not disrupt the amphipathicity of the helix
(29). The A147P mutation
reduced the depurination activity of RTA and led to the loss of its
cytotoxicity (Table 1).
The deletion of Ala147 in helix D abolished the activity of RTA in
vitro (31). The A147P
mutation likely disrupted the structure of helix D in the middle,
destabilizing the active site. The point mutation at Gly140 (G140R),
which is located at the beginning of helix D, abolished both
cytotoxicity and depurination (Table
1 and Fig.
3C). In contrast, deletion
of this glycine did not affect the activity of RTA in vitro
(31). These results
indicate that the structure of RTA might be affected more when Gly140
is changed to an arginine than when it is deleted.
Mutation G83D (NT1031), which is in ß-strand D, eliminated the cytotoxicity of RTA in yeast and reduced its depurination activity (Table 1). Since Gly83 is relatively distant from the active site, it is unlikely that Gly83 participates in the catalysis. Previous studies indicated that RTA lost its depurination activity when Gly83 was deleted (18, 31). A point mutation in the corresponding Gly in PAP (G75D) led to a loss of depurination in vivo (15) and affected the binding of PAP to ribosomes (14). These results suggest that ß-strand D might be important for the interaction of RTA with the ribosome, such that a mutation in Gly83 may affect binding of RTA to ribosomes.
The final important region is close to the C-terminal end of RTA. Nonsense mutations demonstrated that deleting 19 (L248 stop) amino acids from the C-terminal end of pre-RTA eliminated its cytotoxicity in yeast. The last frameshift mutation, P250L+S, which deleted 17 amino acids from the C terminus and changed Pro250 to Leu, also eliminated the ribosome depurination activity (Table 1). Previous studies indicated that deletions between Arg258 and Pro262 or Pro263 and Phe267 did not affect the cytotoxicity of RTA (18). However, point mutations upstream of Arg258, at Ile252, Leu254, and Val256, eliminated the cytotoxicity of RTA (1, 10). In our study, the single mutations at Pro250 (P250L) and at Ala253 (A253V) had little effect on the cytotoxicity of RTA or its ability to depurinate ribosomes. However, when they were combined (P250L-A253V), both cytotoxicity and ribosome depurination were eliminated. These results indicated that the C-terminal region of RTA is critical for ribosome depurination and cytotoxicity. Different forms of protein were observed for the membrane fraction from cells expressing P250L-A253V (Fig. 1), suggesting that the point mutations at the C terminus may have prevented the retrotranslocation of RTA from the ER to the cytosol (40).
Ricin and other protein toxins can cause apoptotic cell death in animal cells that is associated with DNA fragmentation and target cell lysis (20). However, the detailed mechanism of ricin-induced apoptosis and in particular the mechanism by which protein synthesis inhibition by ricin results in apoptosis are unclear. Several lines of evidence suggest that the specific attack on the 28S rRNA of the large ribosomal subunit by RTA may cause the ribotoxic stress response, which in turn leads to apoptosis through a stress-mediated signaling pathway (17). The cleavage of DNA in the nucleus and nuclear fragmentation are typical apoptotic hallmarks in yeast (9, 21). Cells expressing the nontoxic RTA mutants or harboring the empty vector showed a normal and single round-shaped nuclei, whereas cells expressing the pre-RTA or the toxic mutants harbored abnormally shaped and fragmented nuclei (Fig. 5A; also, see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material).
The induction of ROS plays a major role in mediating cell death in yeast (26). Previous studies have demonstrated the accumulation of ROS in yeast cells exposed to oxidative stress or expressing mammalian Bax (22), as well as in the cell cycle mutant cdc48S565G and the gsh1 deletion mutant in the absence of glutathione (24). The involvement of ROS upstream of caspase-3 activation has been demonstrated for signal transduction pathways induced by ricin in various cell types (39). These studies have led to the conclusion that the production of ROS is a necessary and sufficient condition for the induction of apoptosis in yeast. To determine if ROS is produced in yeast expressing pre-RTA, cells were stained with DAB at different times after induction. A weak ROS staining was detected after 6 h of growth on galactose; this staining became significantly more intense thereafter in pre-RTA-expressing cells, as well as in cells expressing the toxic mutants (see Fig. S3 in the supplemental material). In contrast, no ROS staining was detected in cells harboring the vector or expressing the nontoxic mutants (Fig. 6A). Similar results were obtained when intracellular ROS levels were quantitatively determined. A nearly fivefold increase in ROS production was observed for cells expressing pre-RTA compared to controls at 24 h after the galactose shift (Fig. 6B). The induction of ROS correlated well with cell death (Fig. 5A), suggesting that ROS may act as an effector of apoptosis and trigger the subsequent apoptotic events. Taken together, our results strongly suggest that apoptosis-like cell death is induced in yeast expressing the wild-type or toxic forms of pre-RTA and correlates well with the increased generation of ROS. In contrast, apoptotic features are not observed in cells expressing the nontoxic RTA mutants. These results present the first evidence that apoptosis-like cell death induced by RTA is not entirely due to ribosome depurination and translation inhibition. The nontoxic forms of RTA with mutations outside the active site may be candidates for the development of safe and effective recombinant vaccines against ricin. They may also be of value in the development of more effective immunotoxins with reduced side effects.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Michael Lawton, Eric Lam, Bijal Parikh, and Wendie Cohick for critical reading of the manuscript, Rong Di for the construction of the RTA plasmid, Tiffany Kung and Jia-Chi Chiou for help with the analysis of the RTA mutants, and Ira Wool for the generous gift of pRAIBI30.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Published ahead of print on 13 November 2006. ![]()
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://iai.asm.org/. ![]()
The
first two authors should be regarded as joint first authors. ![]()
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Allen, S. C., A. Byron, J. M. Lord, J. Davey, L. M. Roberts, and G. Ladds. 2005. Utilization of the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae for the generation and isolation of non-lethal ricin A chain variants.Yeast 22:1287-1297.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 2. | Atlas, R. M. 2002. Bioterrorism: from threat to reality. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 56:167-185.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 3. | Audi,
J., M. Belson, M. Patel, J. Schier, and J. Osterloh.2005
. Ricin poisoning: a comprehensive review.JAMA
294:2342-2351. |
| 4. | Balzan,
R., K. Sapienza, D. R. Galea, N. Vassallo, H. Frey, and
W. H. Bannister. 2004. Aspirin commits yeast
cells to apoptosis depending on carbon source.Microbiology
150:109-115. |
| 5. | Bolognesi, A., and L. Polito. 2004. Immunotoxins and other conjugates: pre-clinical studies. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 4:563-583. |
| 6. | Castelletti, D., G. Fracasso, S. Righetti, G. Tridente, R. Schnell, A. Engert, and M. Colombatti. 2004. A dominant linear B-cell epitope of ricin A-chain is the target of a neutralizing antibody response in Hodgkin's lymphoma patients treated with an anti-CD25 immunotoxin.Clin. Exp. Immunol. 136:365-372.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 7. | Endo,
Y., and K. Tsurugi. 1987. RNA N-glycosidase activity
of ricin A-chain. Mechanism of action of the toxic lectin ricin on
eukaryotic ribosomes. J. Biol. Chem.
262:8128-8130. |
| 8. | Endo,
Y., and K. Tsurugi. 1988. The RNA N-glycosidase
activity of ricin A-chain. The characteristics of the enzymatic
activity of ricin A-chain with ribosomes and with rRNA.J. Biol. Chem.
263:8735-8739. |
| 9. | Fahrenkrog,
B., U. Sauder, and U. Aebi. 2004. The S.
cerevisiae HtrA-like protein Nma111p is a nuclear serine protease
that mediates yeast apoptosis. J. Cell Sci.
117:115-126. |
| 10. | Frankel,
A., D. Schlossman, P. Welsh, A. Hertler, D. Withers, and S.
Johnston. 1989. Selection and characterization of
ricin toxin A-chain mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Mol. Cell. Biol.
9:415-420. |
| 11. | Frankel,
A., P. Welsh, J. Richardson, and J. D. Robertus.1990
. Role of arginine 180 and glutamic acid 177 of ricin
toxin A chain in enzymatic inactivation of ribosomes. Mol. Cell.
Biol.
10:6257-6263. |
| 12. | Griffiths, G. D., C. D. Lindsay, A. C. Allenby, S. C. Bailey, J. W. Scawin, P. Rice, and D. G. Upshall. 1995. Protection against inhalation toxicity of ricin and abrin by immunization. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 14:155-164.[Medline] |
| 13. | Hartley, M. R., and J. M. Lord. 2004. Cytotoxic ribosome-inactivating lectins from plants. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1701:1-14.[Medline] |
| 14. | Hudak, K. A., A. B. Hammell, J. Yasenchak, N. E. Tumer, and J. D. Dinman. 2001. A C-terminal deletion mutant of pokeweed antiviral protein inhibits programmed +1 ribosomal frameshifting and Ty1 retrotransposition without depurinating the sarcin/ricin loop of rRNA.Virology 279:292-301.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 15. | Hudak,
K. A., B. A. Parikh, R. Di, M. Baricevic, M.
Santana, M. Seskar, and N. E. Tumer. 2004.
Generation of pokeweed antiviral protein mutations in Saccharomyces
cerevisiae: evidence that ribosome depurination is not sufficient
for cytotoxicity. Nucleic Acids Res.
32:4244-4256. |
| 16. | Hur,
Y., D. J. Hwang, O. Zoubenko, C. Coetzer, F. M.
Uckun, and N. E. Tumer. 1995. Isolation and
characterization of pokeweed antiviral protein mutations in
Saccharomyces cerevisiae: identification of residues important
for toxicity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:8448-8452. |
| 17. | Iordanov,
M. S., D. Pribnow, J. L. Magun, T. H.
Dinh, J. A. Pearson, S. L. Chen, and B.
E. Magun. 1997. Ribotoxic stress response: activation
of the stress-activated protein kinase JNK1 by inhibitors of the
peptidyl transferase reaction and by sequence-specific RNA damage to
the -sarcin/ricin loop in the 28S rRNA. Mol. Cell.
Biol.
17:3373-3381.[Abstract] |
| 18. | Kitaoka, Y. 1998. Involvement of the amino acids outside the active-site cleft in the catalysis of ricin A chain. Eur. J. Biochem. 257:255-262.[Medline] |
| 19. | Knight, B. 1979. Ricina potent homicidal poison.Br. Med. J. 1(6159):350-351.[Medline] |
| 20. | Komatsu,
N., T. Oda, and T. Muramatsu. 1998. Involvement of
both caspase-like proteases and serine proteases in apoptotic cell
death induced by ricin, modeccin, diphtheria toxin, and pseudomonas
toxin. J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
124:1038-1044. |
| 21. | Laun, P., A. Pichova, F. Madeo, J. Fuchs, A. Ellinger, S. Kohlwein, I. Dawes, K. U. Frohlich, and M. Breitenbach. 2001. Aged mother cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae show markers of oxidative stress and apoptosis. Mol. Microbiol. 39:1166-1173.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 22. | Ligr, M., F. Madeo, E. Frohlich, W. Hilt, K. U. Frohlich, and D. H. Wolf. 1998. Mammalian Bax triggers apoptotic changes in yeast. FEBS Lett. 438:61-65.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 23. | Lord, J. M., E. Deeks, C. J. Marsden, K. Moore, C. Pateman, D. C. Smith, R. A. Spooner, P. Watson, and L. M. Roberts. 2003. Retrograde transport of toxins across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 31:1260-1262.[Medline] |
| 24. | Madeo,
F., E. Frohlich, and K. U. Frohlich. 1997. A
yeast mutant showing diagnostic markers of early and late apoptosis.J. Cell Biol.
139:729-734. |
| 25. | Madeo,
F., E. Frohlich, M. Ligr, M. Grey, S. J. Sigrist,
D. H. Wolf, and K. U. Frohlich.1999
. Oxygen stress: a regulator of apoptosis in yeast.J. Cell Biol.
145:757-767. |
| 26. | Madeo, F., E. Herker, S. Wissing, H. Jungwirth, T. Eisenberg, and K. U. Frohlich. 2004. Apoptosis in yeast. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 7:655-660.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 27. | Montanaro, L., S. Sperti, A. Mattioli, G. Testoni, and F. Stirpe.1975 . Inhibition by ricin of protein synthesis in vitro. Inhibition of the binding of elongation factor 2 and of adenosine diphosphate-ribosylated elongation factor 2 to ribosomes.Biochem. J. 146:127-131.[Medline] |
| 28. | Monzingo, A. F., and J. D. Robertus. 1992. X-ray analysis of substrate analogs in the ricin A-chain active site.J. Mol. Biol. 227:1136-1145.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 29. | Morris,
K. N., and I. G. Wool. 1994.
Analysis of the contribution of an amphiphilic alpha-helix to the
structure and to the function of ricin A chain. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA
91:7530-7533. |
| 30. | Morris,
K. N., and I. G. Wool. 1992.
Determination by systematic deletion of the amino acids essential for
catalysis by ricin A chain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:4869-4873. |
| 31. | Munishkin, A., and I. G. Wool. 1995. Systematic deletion analysis of ricin A-chain function. Single amino acid deletions. J. Biol. Chem. 270:30581-30587. |
| 32. | Narayanan, S., K. Surendranath, N. Bora, A. Surolia, and A. A. Karande. 2005. Ribosome inactivating proteins and apoptosis. FEBS Lett. 579:1324-1331.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 33. | O'Hare, M., L. M. Roberts, P. E. Thorpe, G. J. Watson, B. Prior, and J. M. Lord. 1987. Expression of ricin A chain in Escherichia coli. FEBS Lett. 216:73-78.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 34. | Olsnes, S., and J. V. Kozlov. 2001. Ricin.Toxicon 39:1723-1728.[Medline] |
| 35. | Osborn, R. W., and M. R. Hartley. 1990. Dual effects of the ricin A chain on protein synthesis in rabbit reticulocyte lysate. Inhibition of initiation and translocation. Eur. J. Biochem. 193:401-407. |
| 36. | Parikh, B. A., U. Baykal, R. Di, and N. E. Tumer.2005 . Evidence for retro-translocation of pokeweed antiviral protein from endoplasmic reticulum into cytosol and separation of its activity on ribosomes from its activity on capped RNA. Biochemistry 44:2478-2490.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 37. | Parikh,
B. A., C. Coetzer, and N. E. Tumer.2002
. Pokeweed antiviral protein regulates the stability
of its own mRNA by a mechanism that requires depurination but can be
separated from depurination of the alpha-sarcin/ricin loop of rRNA.J. Biol. Chem.
277:41428-41437. |
| 38. | Piatak,
M., J. A. Lane, W. Laird, M. J. Bjorn, A. Wang, and
M. Williams. 1988. Expression of soluble and fully
functional ricin A chain in Escherichia coli is
temperature-sensitive. J. Biol. Chem.
263:4837-4843. |
| 39. | Rao, P. V., R. Jayaraj, A. S. Bhaskar, O. Kumar, R. Bhattacharya, P. Saxena, P. K. Dash, and R. Vijayaraghavan. 2005. Mechanism of ricin-induced apoptosis in human cervical cancer cells. Biochem. Pharmacol. 69:855-865.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 40. | Simpson, J. C., L. M. Roberts, K. Romisch, J. Davey, D. H. Wolf, and J. M. Lord. 1999. Ricin A chain utilizes the endoplasmic reticulum-associated protein degradation pathway to enter the cytosol of yeast. FEBS Lett. 459:80-84.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 41. | Stirpe, F., and M. G. Battelli. 2006. Ribosome-inactivating proteins: progress and problems. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 63:1850-1866.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 42. | Thordal-Christensen, H., Z. Zhang, Y. Wei, and D. B. Collinge.1997 . Subcellular localization of H2O2 in plants. H2O2 accumulation in papillae and hypersensitive response during the barley-powdery mildew interaction. Plant J. 11:1187-1194.[CrossRef] |
| 43. | Tommasi, M., D. Castelletti, M. Pasti, G. Fracasso, I. Lorenzetti, S. Sartoris, C. Pera, G. B. Ferrara, G. Tridente, and M. Colombatti.2001 . Identification of ricin A-chain HLA class II-restricted epitopes by human T-cell clones. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 125:391-400.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 44. | Tumer,
N. E., D. J. Hwang, and M. Bonness.1997
. C-terminal deletion mutant of pokeweed antiviral
protein inhibits viral infection but does not depurinate host
ribosomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:3866-3871. |
| 45. | Tumer,
N. E., B. A. Parikh, P. Li, and J. D.
Dinman. 1998. The pokeweed antiviral protein
specifically inhibits Ty1-directed +1 ribosomal
frameshifting and retrotransposition in Saccharomyces
cerevisiae. J. Virol.
72:1036-1042. |
| 46. | Vitetta,
E. S., J. E. Smallshaw, E. Coleman, H. Jafri, C.
Foster, R. Munford, and J. Schindler. 2006. A pilot
clinical trial of a recombinant ricin vaccine in normal humans.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
103:2268-2273. |
| 47. | Xu, Q., J. M. Jurgensmeier, and J. C. Reed.1999 . Methods of assaying Bcl-2 and Bax family proteins in yeast. Methods 17:292-304.[CrossRef][Medline] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||