| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, January 2007, p. 462-470, Vol. 75, No. 1
0019-9567/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/IAI.00443-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Molecular Immunology,1 Molecular Biotechnology,2 Mucosal Immunology, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Inhoffenstraße 7, D-38124 Braunschweig, Germany,3 Institute of Medical Microbiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany4
Received 17 March 2006/ Returned for modification 30 June 2006/ Accepted 20 October 2006
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
During this work it became clear that Listeria, when interacting with a particular host cell, induces strong reactions within this cell (23, 29). This is, on the one hand, due to host cell receptors, like Toll-like receptors, scavenger receptors, or uncharacterized intracytosolic receptors that interact with bacterial components (12, 23). On the other hand, virulence factors have been shown to also induce specific signal cascades upon encountering the host cell surface. The spectrum of such events ranges from rearrangement of the cytoskeleton induced by internalins (3, 6, 15) to induction of apoptosis of dendritic cells (DCs) and T cells by listeriolysin (17, 18). In addition, it is well established that Listeria provokes the secretion of several cytokines in macrophages (10, 21, 34) and the up-regulation of cell adhesion molecules on endothelial cells (9).
Despite these extensive studies, little is known about the immediate in vivo effects of Listeria on cells that are encountered first during infection, i.e., the macrophages that are responsible for the removal of the bacteria from circulation. Induction of proliferation and migration within the spleen have been described (5, 26). Similarly, the early production of proinflammatory cytokines has also been ascribed to them (7, 35).
In vitro it was observed that CCL2 is among the inflammatory cytokines and chemokines instantaneously produced by primary macrophages and macrophage lines upon Listeria infection (references 13, 29, and 30 and unpublished data). In agreement, a protective role of CCL2 in murine listeriosis has been observed recently (31). Therefore, we wanted to investigate whether macrophages are responsible for the production of this mediator in the early phase of listeriosis in vivo. Results showed that expression of CCL2 at 4 h postinfection (p.i.) was restricted exclusively to ERTR-9+ macrophages of the marginal zone (MZM), which also was the population exclusively infected at this time point. Interestingly, experiments with mice in which CCL2 was depleted by administration of specific antibodies demonstrated that CCL2 is specifically involved in the activation of the ERTR-9+ macrophage population to migrate into the infectious foci.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Mice. Female BALB/c mice were purchased from Harlan (Borchem, Germany) and used at the age of 10 to 12 weeks.
Antibodies.
Antibodies (Abs) used in this work included rat-anti-mouse ERTR-9-biotin (BMA Biomedicals), rat-anti-mouse MOMA-1-biotin (BMA Biomedicals), MOMA-1-fluorescein isothiocyanate (Pharmingen), rabbit-anti-L. monocytogenes (Dunn Labortechnik), goat-anti-rabbit 7-amino-4-methylcoumarin-3-acetic acid (AMCA; Sigma), goat anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 488 (Molecular Probes), rat anti-mouse Gr-1-phycoerythrin-Cy7 (eBioscience), rat anti-B220 CyChrome (Pharmingen), hamster anti-murine CD3 (Pharmingen), goat anti-hamster Cy5 and rat anti-mouse DX5 (Pharmingen), CD11b biotinylated (anti-Mac-1; clone M1/70.15.11.5), CD11b-phycoerythrin (eBioscience), CD11c biotinylated (N418; clone CHB 229), CD11c-allophycocyanin (eBioscience), and rabbit anti-mouse laminin 1
chain (ImmunoDiagnostics). Goat anti-mouse CCL2 affinity-purified polyclonal Abs (R&D Systems) were used to deplete mice of CCL2.
PCR. Primers for real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) were selected by using DNASTAR Primer Select software (Lasergene) and purchased from MWG (CCL2 forward, GCCCCACTCACCTGCTGCTA; reverse, TTTACGGGTCAACTTCACATTCAA).
Real-time RT-PCR to quantitate chemokine transcripts. After infection of mice, subpopulations of splenic cells were isolated by cell sorting. Total RNA from cells was prepared with the RNeasy mini kit (QIAGEN) according to the manufacturer's protocol. DNA contamination in the total RNA was eliminated by incubation with DNase I (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Freiburg, Germany). cDNA was prepared using Superscript II RNase H (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions and used in either RT-PCR or real-time RT-PCR. The latter reaction was conducted using a SYBR Green PCR master mix kit (Applied Biosystems) with the GeneAmp 5700 sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems). Results were normalized using the housekeeping gene RPS9.
In vivo infection. BALB/c female mice were infected intravenously (i.v.) with 100 times the 50% lethal dose (5 x 105) of Listeria organisms. After 0, 2, 4, 6, or 24 h, spleens were removed, parts of the organs were used for RNA extraction, aliquots were frozen in liquid nitrogen for histology, and, from part of the spleen, cell suspensions were prepared. The rest of the organ was homogenized in PBS supplemented with 0.2% NP-40 and plated.
Isolation of cells from the spleens of infected mice. Spleen cell suspensions from infected animals were prepared by washing out the spleens with Iscove's modified Dulbecco's medium supplemented with antibiotics (penicillin, 100 µg/ml; streptavidin, 100 µg/ml; gentamicin, 20 µg/ml), and erythrocytes were lysed for 2 min in ACK buffer and then washed three times in PBS containing EDTA. Cell suspensions were then used for fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis or cell sorting.
Polyclonal Ab treatment. To neutralize mouse CCL2, affinity-purified polyclonal goat antibodies against murine CCL2 (R&D Systems) were used. Ten micrograms was injected i.v. in 100 µl of sterile PBS 1 h before bacterial infection. Animals were infected i.v. with 5 x 105 CFU of Listeria and then, 4, 6, and 24 h p.i., mice were sacrificed and spleens were removed and prepared for histology and flow cytometry.
Quantification of L. monocytogenes load in organs of infected mice. Mice were sacrificed at the indicated time points, and fragments of spleens were homogenized in 1 ml of 0.2% NP-40 in PBS. Fifty microliters of these homogenates was plated on BHI agar plates in duplicate, and CFU were estimated after overnight incubation at 37°C.
Quantification of L. monocytogenes load in sorted spleen cell populations. Cells from infected mice were sorted based on surface markers as described for FACS staining, incubated with Triton X-PBS, and plated on BHI agar plates in duplicate. CFU were estimated after overnight incubation at 37°C.
Flow cytometry and cell sorting. Single-cell suspensions were prepared in FACS buffer at a density 5 x 105 cells per well. Cells were treated with anti-mouse FcR Abs, followed by staining with appropriate Abs. Flow cytometry was performed using a FACSCalibur or FACSCanto apparatus (Becton Dickinson). Data were analyzed with CellQuestPro software or FACSDiva software (Becton Dickinson).
Described populations of spleen cells were sorted after Ab staining using MOFLO (Cytomation) or FACSVantage DiVa and subsequently reanalyzed to confirm sort quality, which reached 80 to 90%, depending on cell population.
Immunohistochemistry. Spleens were embedded in Tissue-Tek OCT compound (Sakura), snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at 20°C. Cryostat sections of 7 µm were prepared, air dried for 2 h at room temperature, and fixed in acetone (2 min at 20°C). After thawing, slides were blocked with 0.05% bovine serum albumin in PBS and stained with appropriate antibodies. After staining and washing, slides were dried, mounted with Neo-Mount (Merck), and analyzed using a laser scanning confocal microscope.
Confocal microscopy. Four-color confocal microscopy (AMCA, fluorescein isothiocyanate/Alexa 488, Cy3/Alexa568, and allophycocyanin/Cy5/CyChrome) of cryosections was performed using an LSM 510 META microscope (Zeiss). To avoid overlapping emissions, fluorescent dyes were selectively excited in two series and the fluorescence of single channels was measured by photon counting. Images were processed with Confocal Assistant 4.02, ImagePro 4.5 (Media Cybernetics), and Adobe Photoshop 7.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Importantly, identical clusters were observed when mice were infected with 2 x 103 bacteria. However, their formation required 3 days to be completed (data not shown).
Exclusive infection of ERTR-9+ macrophages by L. monocytogenes. The marginal zone of the spleen is the area where the closed blood circulation opens into the splenic sinus. Therefore, both ERTR-9+ as well as MOMA-1+ macrophages should be exposed to blood-borne pathogens after i.v. infection. However, in the case of Listeria, apparently only one type of macrophage is infected at 4 h p.i. Costaining of splenic cryosections for macrophages and Listeria revealed that bacteria were only found associated with ERTR-9+ macrophages (Fig. 2A), not CD11b+ cells. Even when other cell types appeared to colocalize with Listeria, larger magnifications revealed that the bacteria were in long cellular extensions of ERTR-9+ cells that might be in contact with many other cells in the spleen. This was confirmed by cell sorting and subsequent plating. At 4 h p.i., Listeria organisms were only recovered in significant numbers from the ERTR-9+ macrophages (Table 1).
|
|
Interestingly, MOMA-1+ macrophages, which appear at the beginning of the infection, were also located in the marginal zone and were poorly infected, although they were able to phagocytose Listeria efficiently ex vivo (data not shown). Nevertheless, despite the lack of direct contact with the bacteria at the early phase of infection, MOMA-1+ macrophages became activated and migrated away from the large clusters into the B-cell areas of the white pulp (Fig. 1A and 2C).
ERTR-9+ macrophages are responsible for early production of CCL2. CCL2 was found to be the first chemokine up-regulated in adherent splenocytes isolated from Listeria-infected mice under our conditions (data not shown). Since CCL2 is a chemokine specific for macrophage attraction and the first visible effect of Listeria infection in mice is the migration of macrophages, one might hypothesize that CCL2 is involved in the cluster formation. Consequently, one would expect that the cells infected first, in this case ERTR-9+ macrophages, are the main producers of CCL2 at the early stage of infection. To test this hypothesis, we sorted macrophages and dendritic cells from mice infected with 5 x 105 bacteria at 4 and 24 h p.i. on the basis of the cell markers ERTR-9+, MOMA-1+, F4/80+ (macrophages of the red pulp), CD11c+ (total DCs), and CD11cint/B220+ (plasmacytoid DCs). Analysis of these sorted cells by RT-PCR revealed that ERTR-9+ macrophages indeed were the major producers of CCL2 at 4 h p.i. (Fig. 3A). Only plasmacytoid DCs showed a slight expression of this chemokine at that time point. At later time points, consistent with the presence of bacteria in several phagocytic cell types, all the cell populations tested were able to produce CCL2. Real-time RT-PCR confirmed these results with isolated ERTR-9+ and MOMA-1+ macrophages from infected mice. Only ERTR-9+ cells exhibited a significant up-regulation of CCL2 mRNA at 4 h p.i. (Fig. 3B).
|
Higher susceptibility of CCL2-depleted mice to infection by L. monocytogenes. Since the chemokine CCL2, which attracts macrophages, is apparently up-regulated already during the early phase of Listeria infection in the spleen of BALB/c mice, we decided to investigate the importance of CCL2 in the host defense against Listeria. To this end, CCL2 was depleted by injecting specific antibodies 1 h before infection. Subsequently, mice were infected with 5 x 105 bacteria. An antibody dose of 10 µg/mouse was chosen, although already lower amounts had been shown to neutralize completely the in vivo activity of CCL2 (22). When 104 Listeria were injected into CCL2-depleted mice, a higher susceptibility compared to controls was evident, although the numbers of CFU were not dramatically different in either type of animal (Fig. 4 and data not shown). This is consistent with the findings of Serbina et al. (31, 33). An unexpected discrepancy between bacterial CFU in the spleen and mortality of infected mice was similarly found by Depaolo (8) in the case of Salmonella infection. The reason for this phenomenon is not clear so far.
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It was previously shown that macrophages of the marginal zone are able to ingest Listeria (1, 5), but it was postulated that both populations are equally contributing to this process. We have demonstrated that only one macrophage type, ERTR-9+, colocalizes with bacteria at the early stage of infection. Already at 2 h p.i. bacteria were observed inside ERTR-9+ cells (>90%) (data not shown), while some still resided in the marginal sinus (<10%). At 4 h p.i. all detectable bacteria were found in the ERTR-9+ population.
The reason for such an exquisite cell specificity of Listeria is not clear, but the anatomical location certainly contributes to this, since cells of the marginal zone are preferentially exposed to blood-borne pathogens. In addition, ex vivo experiments have shown that MOMA-1+ cells are able to internalize bacteria almost as well as ERTR-9+ macrophages (data not shown). This raises the question why MOMA1+ macrophages, occupying the same location, are not infected and do not take part in cluster formation. One explanation could be that ERTR-9+ macrophages express specific receptors, like the C-type lectin characterized by the ERTR-9 antibody (SIGNR1), or additional adhesion molecules (16, 20).
Migration of cells in and out of lymphoid organs during infection with bacteria is an intensively studied phenomenon presently. Chemokines and chemokine receptors are most important in this process. In particular, the proinflammatory chemokine CCL2, previously called monocyte chemotactic protein 1, is immediately up-regulated upon infections with many bacterial pathogens. In general, it attracts monocytes and macrophages towards infectious foci.
Infection with Listeria monocytogenes results in up-regulation of many proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines in the spleen (13, 33). Here we have shown that CCL2 is one of the first chemokines up-regulated in ERTR-9+ macrophages, which are the only population infected by Listeria during the early phase of infection. Up-regulation of CCL2 in macrophages infected with Listeria was also observed in vitro (unpublished data) (13, 31) and ex vivo using a splenic adherent cell population isolated from infected BALB/c mice (unpublished data). Immediate up-regulation of CCL2 was independent of whether a lethal or sublethal dose was employed for infection. Thus, our data also show that ERTR-9+ macrophages of the marginal zone are the major producers of CCL2 at the early stage of infection. This implies that direct infection with Listeria is required for initiation of CCL2 production.
The early expression of the proinflammatory chemokine CCL2 by infected ERTR-9+ marginal zone macrophages suggests its important role in the innate host defense. Indeed, antibody depletion of CCL2 strongly enhanced the mortality of BALB/c mice infected with Listeria. Consistently, a strong effect has been observed by others in recombinant C57BL/6 mice lacking CCL2 expression (31, 33).
However, the finding that upon CCL2 depletion ERTR-9+ macrophages do not migrate towards infectious foci of Listeria was unexpected. Normally, at 24 h after infection inflammatory cell clusters were formed by ERTR-9+ cells together with CD11b+ macrophages, Gr-1+ granulocytes, and CD3+ T cells around Listeria-infected cells. In contrast, in CCL2-depleted mice no migration of ERTR-9+ cells was observed, but the migration of all other cell subsets was unaltered. Similarly, colonization of the spleen by Listeria was very little influenced (data not shown). This appears contradictory to data of Sebrina et al. (31) that demonstrated a strong increase of Listeria in the spleens of mice with the CCL2 gene deleted. However, the same authors demonstrated that lack of CCL2 responsiveness did not influence the immigration of CD11b+ into the spleen after Listeria infection (32). Rather, it results in a block of emigration of such cells from the bone marrow and their absence in the circulation.
The reason for the different behaviors of ERTR-9+ cells is unclear. Additional chemokines might be produced to which cells other than ERTR-9 might have receptors. The same reasoning might explain the differential survival of monocyte/granulocyte populations with or without CCL2 depletion. On the other hand, CCL2 might signal in ERTR-9+ macrophages via additional receptors, as described for astrocytes (4, 37). Thus, depletion of CCL2 might influence ERTR-9+ macrophages more severely than other cells.
Taken together, our data allow the following interpretation of the sequence of events during Listeria infection. Infection of ERTR-9+ macrophages, the primary target cell for Listeria, induces CCL2 production in these cells, resulting in the attraction of other phagocytic cells, including noninfected ERTR-9+ macrophages, CD11b+ macrophages, and Gr-1+ granulocytes as well as some CD3+ T cells. Thus, infected ERTR-9+ marginal zone macrophages represent the condensation nucleus of the cell clusters formed in the spleen. When CCL2 is depleted, clusters are formed nevertheless due to additional mediators, but uninfected ERTR-9+ macrophages no longer take part in cell migration. Obviously, migration of this population depends exclusively on an early CCL2 signal. Moreover, it is possible that due to the CCL2 dysfunction, infected ERTR-9+ macrophages are killed by the bacterium and therefore are no longer detectable in the clusters at 24 h p.i. Such a scenario is suggested by the severe decrease in the number of such cells at 24 h p.i.
Our interpretation of the sequence of events is in apparent contrast to that suggested by Muraille et al. (5, 26). Cluster formation was observed by them but was interpreted as a migration of infected macrophages into the T-cell areas of the spleen. Laminin staining of cryosections allowed us to clarify this controversy. T cells and most other cells are in fact migrating towards the infectious foci formed in the marginal zone. The complex clusters of cells sometimes reach from the marginal zone into the white and/or the red pulp. However, the majority of such clusters do not surround the central arteriole, a hallmark of the T-cell zone, although occasionally clusters reach up to this vessel.
Intriguingly, the second population of macrophages found in the marginal zone, recognized by MOMA-1 antibodies, is not infected by Listeria. This was unexpected, considering the anatomical localization of these macrophages in the marginal zone and their verified ability to efficiently phagocytose Listeria ex vivo. Evidently, these macrophages are not attracted to the clusters of phagocytic cells formed around the infectious foci. Rather, they migrate to the B-cell follicles independently of CCL2. It is tempting to speculate that these macrophages up-regulate the chemokine receptor CXCR5, which is responsible for homeostatic recruitment of B cells to the follicles (2, 14, 19, 25, 28). Clustering of MOMA-1+ macrophages in the B-cell follicles might then be due to the location of a cellular source of the chemokine CCL13, the ligand of CXCR5.
Taken together, our results imply an important function for CCL2 during the initial phase of the innate immune response against L. monocytogenes. On the other hand, our data also extend the complexity of host reactions that are encountered during Listeria infection.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Lothar Gröbe for help with cell sorting, Patricia Gezlaff and Katarina Raba for expert technical help, and Christofer Samuelsson for critical reading of the manuscript. We also thank Reinhold Förster for helpful discussions and Stefan Kaufmann and Hans-Willi Mittrücker for providing the possibility for some of the sorting experiments.
We do not have a commercial or other association that might pose a conflict of interest.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Published ahead of print on 30 October 2006. ![]()
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Aichele, P., J. Zinke, L. Grode, R. A. Schwendener, S. H. Kaufmann, and P. Seiler. 2003. Macrophages of the splenic marginal zone are essential for trapping of blood-borne particulate antigen but dispensable for induction of specific T cell responses. J. Immunol. 171:1148-1155. |
| 2. | Ansel, K. M., V. N. Ngo, P. L. Hyman, S. A. Luther, R. Forster, J. D. Sedgwick, J. L. Browning, M. Lipp, and J. G. Cyster. 2000. A chemokine-driven positive feedback loop organizes lymphoid follicles. Nature 406:309-314.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 3. | Bergmann, B., D. Raffelsbauer, M. Kuhn, M. Goetz, S. Hom, and W. Goebel. 2002. InlA- but not InlB-mediated internalization of Listeria monocytogenes by non-phagocytic mammalian cells needs the support of other internalins. Mol. Microbiol. 43:557-570.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 4. | Brouwer, N., M. W. Zuurman, T. Wei, R. M. Ransohoff, H. W. Boddeke, and K. Biber. 2004. Induction of glial L-CCR mRNA expression in spinal cord and brain in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Glia 46:84-94.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 5. | Conlan, J. W. 1996. Early pathogenesis of Listeria monocytogenes infection in the mouse spleen. J. Med. Microbiol. 44:295-302.[Abstract] |
| 6. | Cossart, P., J. Pizarro-Cerda, and M. Lecuit. 2003. Invasion of mammalian cells by Listeria monocytogenes: functional mimicry to subvert cellular functions. Trends Cell Biol. 13:23-31.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 7. | Dai, W. J., W. Bartens, G. Kohler, M. Hufnagel, M. Kopf, and F. Brombacher. 1997. Impaired macrophage listericidal and cytokine activities are responsible for the rapid death of Listeria monocytogenes-infected IFN-gamma receptor-deficient mice. J. Immunol. 158:5297-5304.[Abstract] |
| 8. | Depaolo, R. W., R. Lathan, B. J. Rollins, and W. J. Karpus. 2005. The chemokine CCL2 is required for control of murine gastric Salmonella enterica infection. Infect. Immun. 73:6514-6522. |
| 9. | Drevets, D. A. 1997. Listeria monocytogenes infection of cultured endothelial cells stimulates neutrophil adhesion and adhesion molecule expression. J. Immunol. 158:5305-5313.[Abstract] |
| 10. | Edelson, B. T., and E. R. Unanue. 2000. Immunity to Listeria infection. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 12:425-431.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 11. | Edelson, B. T., and E. R. Unanue. 2001. Intracellular antibody neutralizes Listeria growth. Immunity 14:503-512.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 12. | Edelson, B. T., and E. R. Unanue. 2002. MyD88-dependent but Toll-like receptor 2-independent innate immunity to Listeria: no role for either in macrophage listericidal activity. J. Immunol. 169:3869-3875. |
| 13. | Flesch, I. E., J. Barsig, and S. H. Kaufmann. 1998. Differential chemokine response of murine macrophages stimulated with cytokines and infected with Listeria monocytogenes. Int. Immunol. 10:757-765. |
| 14. | Forster, R., A. E. Mattis, E. Kremmer, E. Wolf, G. Brem, and M. Lipp. 1996. A putative chemokine receptor, BLR1, directs B cell migration to defined lymphoid organs and specific anatomic compartments of the spleen. Cell 87:1037-1047.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 15. | Frischknecht, F., and M. Way. 2001. Surfing pathogens and the lessons learned for actin polymerization. Trends Cell Biol. 11:30-38.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 16. | Geijtenbeek, T. B., P. C. Groot, M. A. Nolte, S. J. van Vliet, S. T. Gangaram-Panday, G. C. van Duijnhoven, G. Kraal, A. J. van Oosterhout, and Y. van Kooyk. 2002. Marginal zone macrophages express a murine homologue of DC-SIGN that captures blood-borne antigens in vivo. Blood 100:2908-2916. |
| 17. | Guzman, C. A., E. Domann, M. Rohde, D. Bruder, A. Darji, S. Weiss, J. Wehland, T. Chakraborty, and K. N. Timmis. 1996. Apoptosis of mouse dendritic cells is triggered by listeriolysin, the major virulence determinant of Listeria monocytogenes. Mol. Microbiol. 20:119-126.[Medline] |
| 18. | Jiang, J., L. L. Lau, and H. Shen. 2003. Selective depletion of nonspecific T cells during the early stage of immune responses to infection. J. Immunol. 171:4352-4358. |
| 19. | Junt, T., K. Fink, R. Forster, B. Senn, M. Lipp, M. Muramatsu, R. M. Zinkernagel, B. Ludewig, and H. Hengartner. 2005. CXCR5-dependent seeding of follicular niches by B and Th cells augments antiviral B cell responses. J. Immunol. 175:7109-7116. |
| 20. | Kang, Y. S., S. Yamazaki, T. Iyoda, M. Pack, S. A. Bruening, J. Y. Kim, K. Takahara, K. Inaba, R. M. Steinman, and C. G. Park. 2003. SIGN-R1, a novel C-type lectin expressed by marginal zone macrophages in spleen, mediates uptake of the polysaccharide dextran. Int. Immunol. 15:177-186. |
| 21. | Kaufmann, S. H., and G. Kaplan. 1996. Immunity to intracellular bacteria. Res. Immunol. 147:487-489.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 22. | Lloyd, C. M., A. W. Minto, M. E. Dorf, A. Proudfoot, T. N. Wells, D. J. Salant, and J. C. Gutierrez-Ramos. 1997. RANTES and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) play an important role in the inflammatory phase of crescentic nephritis, but only MCP-1 is involved in crescent formation and interstitial fibrosis. J. Exp. Med. 185:1371-1380. |
| 23. | McCaffrey, R. L., P. Fawcett, M. O'Riordan, K. D. Lee, E. A. Havell, P. O. Brown, and D. A. Portnoy. 2004. A specific gene expression program triggered by gram-positive bacteria in the cytosol. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:11386-11391. |
| 24. | Mebius, R. E., and G. Kraal. 2005. Structure and function of the spleen. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 5:606-616.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 25. | Mueller, N. J., R. A. Wilkinson, and J. A. Fishman. 2002. Listeria monocytogenes infection in caspase-11-deficient mice. Infect. Immun. 70:2657-2664. |
| 26. | Muraille, E., R. Giannino, P. Guirnalda, I. Leiner, S. Jung, E. G. Pamer, and G. Lauvau. 2005. Distinct in vivo dendritic cell activation by live versus killed Listeria monocytogenes. Eur. J. Immunol. 35:1463-1471.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 27. | Neighbors, M., X. Xu, F. J. Barrat, S. R. Ruuls, T. Churakova, R. Debets, J. F. Bazan, R. A. Kastelein, J. S. Abrams, and A. O'Garra. 2001. A critical role for interleukin 18 in primary and memory effector responses to Listeria monocytogenes that extends beyond its effects on Interferon gamma production. J. Exp. Med. 194:343-354. |
| 28. | Ohl, L., G. Bernhardt, O. Pabst, and R. Forster. 2003. Chemokines as organizers of primary and secondary lymphoid organs. Semin. Immunol. 15:249-255.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 29. | Pamer, E. G. 2004. Immune responses to Listeria monocytogenes. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 4:812-823.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 30. | Portnoy, D. A., V. Auerbuch, and I. J. Glomski. 2002. The cell biology of Listeria monocytogenes infection: the intersection of bacterial pathogenesis and cell-mediated immunity. J. Cell Biol. 158:409-414. |
| 31. | Serbina, N. V., W. Kuziel, R. Flavell, S. Akira, B. Rollins, and E. G. Pamer. 2003. Sequential MyD88-independent and -dependent activation of innate immune responses to intracellular bacterial infection. Immunity 19:891-901.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 32. | Serbina, N. V., and E. G. Pamer. 2006. Monocyte emigration from bone marrow during bacterial infection requires signals mediated by chemokine receptor CCR2. Nat. Immunol. 7:311-317.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 33. | Serbina, N. V., T. P. Salazar-Mather, C. A. Biron, W. A. Kuziel, and E. G. Pamer. 2003. TNF/iNOS-producing dendritic cells mediate innate immune defense against bacterial infection. Immunity 19:59-70.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 34. | Unanue, E. R. 1996. Macrophages, NK cells and neutrophils in the cytokine loop of Listeria resistance. Res. Immunol. 147:499-505.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 35. | Unanue, E. R. 1997. Studies in listeriosis show the strong symbiosis between the innate cellular system and the T-cell response. Immunol. Rev. 158:11-25.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 36. | Vazquez-Boland, J. A., M. Kuhn, P. Berche, T. Chakraborty, G. Dominguez-Bernal, W. Goebel, B. Gonzalez-Zorn, J. Wehland, and J. Kreft. 2001. Listeria pathogenesis and molecular virulence determinants. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 14:584-640. |
| 37. | Zuurman, M. W., J. Heeroma, N. Brouwer, H. W. Boddeke, and K. Biber. 2003. LPS-induced expression of a novel chemokine receptor (L-CCR) in mouse glial cells in vitro and in vivo. Glia 41:327-336.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| J. Bacteriol. | J. Virol. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|
| Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. | Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | All ASM Journals |
|---|