Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, October 2007, p. 4933-4941, Vol. 75, No. 10
0019-9567/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/IAI.00705-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, P.O. Box 22002, Albany, New York 12201-2002,1 The Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Public Health, University at Albany, Albany, New York 12201-05092
Received 24 May 2007/ Returned for modification 27 June 2007/ Accepted 18 July 2007
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
) is essential (4). However, work from several laboratories, using a variety of infection models, has demonstrated that antibodies can also play an important role in immunity (6, 8, 10, 26, 33, 35, 44, 51). In our own studies, for example, we found that immune serum or outer membrane protein (OMP)-specific monoclonal antibodies could protect susceptible SCID mice from fatal monocytotropic ehrlichia infection (24, 26). Although these and other studies indicated that antibodies could control ehrlichia infections in immunodeficient mice, they did not reveal the extent to which antibodies mediate protection in immunocompetent mice.
More recent studies of immunity to highly pathogenic Ehrlichia bacteria isolated from Ixodes ovatus (IOE) revealed that B cells were essential for protection in immunocompetent mice following a low-dose sublethal infection (51). However, low-dose IOE-infected wild-type mice generated relatively poor antibody responses and were not protected from a subsequent fatal high-dose IOE challenge infection (5, 51). In contrast, infection with a closely related low-pathogenicity ehrlichia, Ehrlichia muris (19), was shown to generate effective immunity to IOE challenge (17). In these latter studies, infection was associated with production of IFN-
by CD4 T cells, although the requirement(s) for CD4 T cells, B cells, and inflammatory cytokines in protective immunity was not fully resolved.
Here we have addressed the underlying mechanisms of protective immunity induced by E. muris infection. In contrast to our expectations that CD4 Th1 cells would play an important and essential role in immunity, we found instead that B cells and antibodies were required for protection. Moreover, B-cell-dependent protective immunity was generated in the absence of CD4 T cells. These findings indicate that B cells and antibodies can play not only auxiliary but also central roles in host defense during an intracellular bacterial infection in immunocompetent mice.
|
|
|---|
deficient (C.129S7(B6)-Ifngtm1s), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-
) deficient (B6.129S6-Tnfftm1Gk1), B-cell deficient (B6.129S2-Igh-6tm1Cgn/J; also known as µMT), and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II deficient (B6.129-H2dIAb1-Ea/J). Mice were gender matched for each experiment and were 6 to 12 weeks in age.
Antibodies.
The anti-CD4 antibody (GK1.5) used for flow cytometry was obtained from BD Biosciences (Franklin Lakes, NJ). The same antibody was used to neutralize CD4 T cells in vivo. IFN-
was neutralized using rat immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1), which was produced by the hybridoma XMG1.2; the antibody was purified by protein A affinity chromatography.
Bacterial infections and immunizations. Infections were performed as described previously (4). Mice were inoculated via the peritoneum. Institutional standards for animal welfare did not permit the use of death as an end point in the infection experiments, and so mice were routinely sacrificed when deemed moribund and judged to be incapable of surviving infection. Morbidity was indicated by ruffled coat, immobility, and hunched posture. Quantitative PCR was used to determine the bacterial copy number in the frozen aliquots, as described previously (4). We have made the simplifying assumption that copy number and numbers of viable bacteria were equivalent in our experimental model. For immunizations, mice were challenged with IOE >4 weeks after E. muris immunization. Listeria monocytogenes infection was performed by intraperitoneal inoculation of 7.2 x 104 CFU. CFU were determined on blood agar.
CD4 T-cell purification. CD4 T cells were purified from mouse spleen cell homogenates using a CD4 T-cell isolation kit (BD Biosciences) following the instructions of the manufacturer. For further CD4 T-cell enrichment, the samples were sorted by flow cytometry using a FACSVantage flow cytometric cell sorter (BD Biosciences), which yielded cells of a purity of >99%. For T-cell adoptive transfers, CD4 T cells were purified by negative magnetic bead selection (Miltenyi Biotec) and were resuspended in Hanks balanced salt solution at a concentration of 2 x 106/ml prior to transfer (0.5 ml) to recipient mice by tail vein injection.
B-cell depletion. B cells were depleted from whole splenocyte suspensions using goat anti-mouse polyclonal IgG microbeads (Polysciences Inc.). The beads were washed and mixed with the splenocytes (4 ml/spleen), and the suspension was incubated at 4°C on a rocker for 30 min prior to binding to the magnet. The supernatant containing unbound cells was used in cell transfer experiments. Fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis revealed that the depleted cell suspensions contained fewer than 2% B220-positive cells.
Cell and cytokine neutralization.
For neutralization of CD4 T cells, mice were administered anti-CD4 (GK1.5; 200 µg/dose) 1 day prior to IOE challenge. For IFN-
neutralization, mice were administered two doses of anti-IFN-
(XMG1.2) on days 1 and 4 post-IOE challenge.
Transfer of polyclonal sera and monoclonal antibodies. E. muris immune serum was obtained from C57BL/6 or MHC class II-deficient mice 2 to 4 weeks after infection, and normal serum was obtained from uninfected C57BL/6 mice. The serum titer was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using purified recombinant E. muris OMP-19, as described previously (51). The E. muris immune and normal sera (100 µl/injection) were transferred into C57BL/6 mice via the peritoneum 1 day prior and 3 and 7 days post-IOE infection. The monoclonal antibody Ec56.5 (26) and the isotype control antibody KJ1-26 (200 µg/injection) were injected in a similar fashion.
Statistical analyses. Statistical analyses of survival/morbidity in the challenge studies were performed using a log rank test. Other data were analyzed using a one-tailed Mann-Whitney test with a confidence interval of 95%. Data were analyzed using Prism software (GraphPad Software, Inc.).
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (32K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. E. muris infection generates dose-dependent immunity to IOE challenge infection. a. C57BL/6 mice were infected with 4 x 104 E. muris, and 30 days later infected and uninfected control mice were challenged with high-dose IOE (2x LD50). Morbidity was monitored using the criteria described in Materials and Methods. Four mice were used per group. b. Bacterial infection in the spleens of immunized and control mice was determined on the indicated days postinfection. Standard deviations of the means are indicated. c. Mice were immunized with the indicated doses of E. muris and challenged with high-dose IOE. d. IOE challenge infections of immunized mice were performed using from 1 to 8 times the LD50, as indicated. In all experiments at least four mice were used in each group. e. Mice were infected via the peritoneum with L. monocytogenes (Lm; 7.2 x 104 CFU) 7 days prior to challenge with IOE. Control mice received only Lm or IOE, or were immunized prior to IOE challenge with E. muris (Em-IOE). f. Mice were immunized via the peritoneum with E. muris and challenged with IOE via the peritoneum (i.p.) or intravenously (i.v.). The protection observed following either route of injection was statistically significant (P < 0.04).
|
-, nor TNF-
-deficient mice were susceptible to fatal E. muris infection, although SCID and RAG-deficient mice succumbed within 16 to 20 days postinfection (data not shown). Our data indicated that either T or B cells are sufficient for host defense against E. muris, as has been reported previously for Ehrlichia chaffeensis (50). Since most of the immune-deficient mouse strains examined were resistant to primary E. muris infection, we next tested whether these strains could be immunized against high-dose IOE challenge. Both CD4- and CD8-deficient E. muris-immunized mice were found to be protected (Fig. 2a and b), and bacterial burden in the CD4-deficient mice was similar to E. muris-immunized wild-type controls (see Fig. 3b, below). These data, which indicate that neither CD4 nor CD8 T cells are required for resistance to IOE challenge, contrast with our previous finding that the CD4 coreceptor was required for protection against a low-dose (nonfatal) IOE infection in unimmunized mice (4).
![]() View larger version (27K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. T cells are not essential for E. muris-induced immunity following IOE challenge. a. CD4-deficient mice were immunized with E. muris and then challenged with IOE (2x LD50) approximately 30 days later. Similar studies were performed with CD8-deficient (b) and class II MHC-deficient (c) mice. Unimmunized (unimm) and immunized (imm) mice were used as controls. Data in panel b were statistically significant (P = 0.043). d. Wild-type and CD4-deficient mice were immunized with E. muris and then challenged with IOE. One group of wild-type mice was administered anti-CD4 1 day prior to IOE challenge (GK1.5; 200 µg/injection). e. Naive mice were administered 2 x 106 splenocytes (imm. SPCs) or flow cytometry-purified CD4 T cells (imm. CD4+; 99.2% purity) that had been obtained from E. muris-immunized mice at least 30 days after immunization. All experiments utilized three to five mice per group.
|
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. B cells are essential for immunity. a. B-cell-deficient (µMT) mice were immunized with E. muris and challenged with IOE (2x LD50), and morbidity was monitored. The data were statistically significant (P = 0.043; analysis of the immunized groups). b. Bacterial infection was quantitated in spleens of wild-type, B-cell-deficient (B cell KO), and CD4-deficient (CD4 KO) mice. Each data point represents a single mouse. Brackets indicate data used for statistical analysis. *, P = 0.05. n.s., not significant. c. One day prior to IOE challenge, naive mice were administered 1 x 106 total (imm. SPCs) or B-cell-depleted splenocytes obtained from E. muris-immunized donor mice. Each group contained four mice. The data were statistically significant (P = 0.017).
|
B cells are essential for protection. Since we have previously shown that antibodies and/or B cells can play potentially important roles during ehrlichia infection, we next addressed whether B cells are essential during IOE challenge. E. muris immunization of B-cell-deficient mice did not generate protective immunity (Fig. 3a). Morbidity in the B-cell-deficient mice was accompanied by bacterial loads that were at least 30-fold higher than wild-type mice on days 7 and 10 postinfection (Fig. 3b). No or only nominal differences were observed between the wild-type and CD4-deficient mice. Moreover, in transfer studies similar to those described above, depletion of B cells from the spleen cell suspensions resulted in loss of protection following IOE challenge (Fig. 3c). These data indicated that B cells, but not CD4 T cells, are essential for E. muris-induced immunity during fatal IOE challenge.
Type I cytokines are not required for immunity.
Although we found B cells to be required for immunity, we did not know whether, in addition, type I cytokines play an important role. Type I cytokines have been found to be important in resolving primary low-dose IOE infection (4), and so it is possible that B cells mediate protection in part via the secretion of these cytokines, as has been observed in other studies (14, 22). Given that several of our cytokine-deficient strains survived E. muris infection (Fig. 2), IFN-
-, TNF-
-, and IL-12 p40-deficient mice were immunized with E. muris and challenged at least 4 weeks later with IOE. All of the cytokine-deficient mice examined survived an IOE challenge that was fatal to unimmunized mice (Fig. 4a), suggesting either that the cytokines were nonessential or that these cytokine functions were redundant in the genetically deficient mice.
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Type I cytokines are not required for protective immunity. a. Wild-type and IFN- -, TNF- -, and IL-12 p40-deficient mice were immunized with E. muris and later challenged with 2x LD50 of IOE. In each case the groups of gene-targeted mice were statistically different from the wild-type control mice (P = 0.043). b. E. muris-immunized mice were treated with two doses of anti-IFN- neutralizing antibody (clone XMG1.2; 200 µg/dose) 1 and 4 days after IOE challenge. Naïve and immunized mice were used as controls. c. Serum concentrations of IFN- were measured on day 16 post-IOE challenge in the antibody-treated and nontreated immunized mice. Standard deviations are indicated. *, P < 0.05.
|
is well known to be an essential cytokine during many intracellular bacterial infections and because our previous studies had demonstrated that this cytokine is essential during low-dose IOE infection (4). We therefore used an alternative approach to address whether IFN-
is required in the E. muris-immunized mice. IFN-
neutralization on days 1 and 4 postinfection did not affect protective immunity (Fig. 4b), indicating that the lack of a requirement for IFN-
in the genetically deficient mice was unlikely due to compensatory mechanisms operative in the genetically deficient mice. To confirm that antibody-mediated IFN-
neutralization was effective, we measured IFN-
concentrations in the sera of treated and untreated mice. Serum IFN-
concentrations in treated IOE-challenged immunized mice were approximately threefold lower than in nontreated IOE-challenged immunized mice, and they were twofold lower relative to susceptible unimmunized naive mice (Fig. 4c). Thus, our data collectively demonstrate that type I immunity is not required for E. muris-induced immunity to IOE challenge infection. Antibodies are sufficient to mediate immunity. E. muris infection generates robust antibody responses (9, 17, 51), so we next considered whether protective immunity could be generated following passive transfer of immune serum. Polyclonal sera obtained from E. muris-immunized mice protected naive mice from fatal IOE challenge (Fig. 5a). Data from three separate experiments revealed that immune sera-treated mice were significantly protected relative to normal serum-treated mice (P < 0.0001), indicating that serum antibodies were likely responsible. ELISA confirmed that the immune serum from the E. muris-immunized mice contained high titers of IOE OMP-19-specific antibodies of various Ig subclasses (data not shown). For the ELISA, OMP-19 was used as a representative ehrlichia antigen, since we have previously demonstrated that OMPs are immunodominant during ehrlichia infections (26). The data suggest that antibodies can provide at least a component of immunity, although these studies do not exclude an additional role(s) for B cells.
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Immune serum can transfer protection against IOE challenge. a. Serum was pooled from immunized mice at least 30 days after infection and was administered to naïve mice 1 day prior and 3 and 7 days post-IOE challenge (100 µl/dose). Normal serum was administered as a control. Data combined from four experiments are shown (P = 0.0001; n = 17). The Ig titer of the immune sera was greater than 1:1,200. b. The monoclonal antibody Ec56.5, or an isotype control, was administered to naïve mice 1 day prior and 3 and 7 days post-IOE infection (200 µg/dose). Each group contained four mice. The data shown are representative of two experiments. c. Serum was pooled from E. muris-immunized MHC-II-deficient mice on day 30 postinfection and was administered to naive mice, as described for panel a. The differences were statistically significant (P < 0.0082; n = 5). The Ig titer of the immune serum was greater than 1:200.
|
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. T-cell-independent antibody responses in E. muris-immunized mice. OMP-19 antibody titers were measured in sera of E. muris-immunized wild-type, MHC class II-, and CD4-deficient mice. Differences in titers between wild-type and gene-targeted strains were statistically significant, except where indicated (n.s.) (Mann-Whitney test with 99% confidence interval; P < 0.05).
|
|
|
|---|
Although E. muris has been reported to establish persistent infection in immunocompetent hosts (20, 38), bacterial numbers decrease dramatically following peak infection, which occurs on day 9 postinfection. By day 120 postimmunization, E. muris infection was near the limits of detection in spleen, liver, and lungs (38). Moreover, in our studies we were unable to transfer E. muris infection to highly susceptible RAG-deficient mice using spleen cells (1 x 106) obtained from E. muris-infected mice 30 or 60 days postinfection, and treatment of mice with doxycycline at various times post-E. muris immunization did not affect immunity to IOE challenge (C. Bitsaktsis, R. Racine, K. C. MacNamara, and G. Winslow, unpublished data). Thus, although we have not completely resolved whether low-level persistent infection and/or inflammation contributes to long-term immunity in our model, current data suggest that this will unlikely be the case. Moreover, induction of inflammation in the peritoneum using L. monocytogenes prior to IOE challenge failed to generate protection, providing further support that immunity was a not a consequence of nonspecific innate inflammatory processes.
Our findings differ somewhat from those reported by Ismail et al., who demonstrated that polyclonal antibodies obtained from E. muris-immunized mice were insufficient for protection following fatal IOE challenge (17). One possible explanation for the discordance is that the IOE challenge doses, as well as the regimens of serum administration, differed between the two studies. Serum administration did not protect all challenged mice in our studies, perhaps because it is difficult to obtain high concentrations of the administered antibodies in the recipient mice following passive serum transfer. Another explanation is that both B cells and antibodies play important roles in immunity during intracellular ehrlichia infection.
Although we reported previously that B cells and/or antibodies are essential during low-dose IOE infection, we have also demonstrated that IFN-
production by CD4 T cells is required for protection during primary low-dose IOE infection (4). Why, then, is immunity to low-dose IOE infection B cell and CD4 T cell dependent, whereas heterologous immunity to high-dose IOE challenge is CD4 T cell independent? The observation that CD8-deficient mice were protected by E. muris immunization suggests that CD8 T cells do not substitute for CD4 T cells in the latter's absence. Although B cells were necessary for low-dose IOE immunity, the antibody responses in low-dose IOE-infected mice were relatively poor (51). Therefore, we propose that in the presence of a high-titer antibody response, as had been detected following E. muris immunization (17, 51), CD4 T cells are not required for immunity to IOE challenge infection. However, in the absence of a strong humoral response, CD4 T cells are required for immunity after low-dose IOE infection. The requirement for B cells in the low-dose IOE-infected mice could have been due instead to a role for B cells in generating protective CD4 T-cell responses (22). Why low-dose IOE infection does not generate high-titer antibody responses is not yet known, but this observation may explain why low-dose IOE infection does not generate immunity to high-dose IOE challenge infection (4).
Ehrlichia infections can persist in low numbers in both naturally and experimentally infected animals in the presence of high-titer antibodies (12, 38, 52), indicating that antibodies are not always sufficient for sterile immunity. We have proposed that antibodies are effective when the ehrlichiae are exposed extracellularly (25), and so intracellular ehrlichiae are likely controlled by T cells in most ehrlichiae infections. IOE, perhaps due to differences in its intracellular life cycle, may represent a special case, where antibodies can be effective even in the absence of T cells. Nevertheless, even during IOE infection, CD4 T-cell-derived IFN-
, as well as other cytokines, likely contributes to immunity. This has been difficult to assess experimentally in our model, however, as susceptibility to fatal IOE infection occurs within a narrow range of infectious doses, between 500 and 1,000 bacteria. OMP-19 antibody titers were significantly higher in wild-type relative to CD4- and MHC class II-deficient mice, and so CD4 T cells likely also provide a component of B-cell help to facilitate antibody production. Studies of immunity in animals infected via the natural route of transmission have not yet been performed, and so it is also possible that tick feeding may modify mechanisms of immunity, as has been observed during other tick-borne infection models (41, 43).
The observation that immunity to IOE challenge infection can occur in a CD4 T-cell-independent fashion was also unexpected. Although it is possible that the apparent T-cell-independent immunity was due to remaining small populations of CD4-like T cells in the CD4- and/or MHC class II-deficient mice, we consider this unlikely, given that both CD4 and IFN-
depletion during IOE challenge infection failed to impair protective immunity. Moreover, CD4 T-cell-mediated B-cell helper functions were not observed in a study of influenza virus infection of CD4- and MHC class II-deficient mice (23). To our knowledge, ours is the first example where immunity to an intracellular bacterium could be generated in the absence of type I cytokines such as IFN-
and TNF-
.
The class of antibody responsible for E. muris-induced immunity has also not yet been determined. T-cell-independent antibody responses are typically associated with IgM and IgG3 utilization (29), although isotype-switched antibodies are often associated with T-cell-independent immunity (34). However, since isotype-switched OMP-specific antibodies were observed in the CD4- and MHC class II-deficient mice, it is possible that protection was mediated by antibodies of several classes, or by particular isotypes, as was observed following transfer of monoclonal antibodies to SCID mice (24). Although B-cell isotype switching can occur in the absence of T-cell help (45, 46), this too was an unexpected finding after E. muris infection, especially considering that the class-switched antibody responses in the CD4 T-cell- and class II MHC-deficient mice, although generally lower than those observed in wild-type mice, were nonetheless substantial. We envision several possible explanations for the apparent T-cell-independent class switching. One possibility is that B-cell help for isotype switching is provided by NKT cells. It has been demonstrated that the ehrlichiae, including E. muris, express exogenous glycolipid CD1d antigens that are capable of priming NKT cells (3, 18, 31). NKT cell-mediated B-cell helper functions have been observed in other studies (11, 13), and CD1d expression by marginal zone B cells was shown to be essential during borrelia infection (2). OMP-19 antibody titers in E. muris-infected CD1d-deficient mice were similar to titers in wild-type mice (G. Winslow, unpublished data), although it is possible that CD4 T-cell-dependent B-cell help available in these mice masked CD1d-dependent helper activity.
A second explanation for the observation that class switching occurred in the absence of CD4 T cells is that dendritic cells or 
T cells provided B-cell helper function (7, 49) or, alternatively, that other forms of help can be mediated in the absence of CD4 T cells. For example, recent findings indicate that triggering via Toll-like receptors (TLRs) can mediate B-cell isotype switching (15, 21). Although the ehrlichiae do not express lipopolysaccharide or peptidoglycan, we have observed a requirement for TLR2 during low-dose IOE infection (C. Bitsaktsis, K. C. MacNamara, and G. Winslow, unpublished data), suggesting a possible role for TLRs in B-cell isotype switching during ehrlichia infection.
Our studies also suggest that highly effective, long-lived B-cell responses can be generated in both wild-type and CD4 T-cell-deficient mice. This was evident from our findings that protection against IOE challenge was observed as long as 110 days after E. muris immunization. It is not yet clear if protection is associated with a particular memory B-cell population or if effector B cells are maintained as a consequence of a persistent low-level infection and/or inflammation following E. muris infection. Given that at least a component of the protection observed in our model was due to T-cell-independent antibodies, our data may support other observations that T-cell-independent antigens can generate immunological memory (1, 36).
E. muris infection generates highly effective heterologous immunity, but E. chaffeensis infection does not (4). This is despite the fact that both infections generate high-titer OMP antibody responses. Although we have proposed OMPs as candidates for protective T-cell-independent responses, it is possible that other antigens selectively expressed by E. muris and E. chaffeensis are essential for antibody-mediated protection. Alternatively, the quality (i.e., affinity, isotype utilization) of the humoral responses to the two pathogens may differ in important ways. The fact that CD4-deficient AIDS patients are in some cases susceptible to E. chaffeensis infections (39) suggests either that E. chaffeensis does not generate protective T-cell-independent immunity in humans or that other factors contribute to susceptibility in these individuals. Nevertheless, our study demonstrates that highly effective T-cell-independent humoral immunity can be generated following heterologous ehrlichia infection in mice, and this supports the findings from our previous studies that antibodies provide a major component of host defense during these intracellular bacterial infections.
This work was supported by U.S. Public Health Service grant R01 AI064678 to G.W.
We have no conflicting financial interests.
Published ahead of print on 30 July 2007. ![]()
|
|
|---|
by CD4 T cells is essential for resolving ehrlichia infection. J. Immunol. 172:6894-6901.This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»