IAI FigSearch
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
IAI.00574-07v1
75/12/5748    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moens, L.
Right arrow Articles by Bossuyt, X.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moens, L.
Right arrow Articles by Bossuyt, X.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Infection and Immunity, December 2007, p. 5748-5752, Vol. 75, No. 12
0019-9567/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/IAI.00574-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Specific Intracellular Adhesion Molecule-Grabbing Nonintegrin R1 Is Not Involved in the Murine Antibody Response to Pneumococcal Polysaccharides{triangledown}

Leen Moens,1 Axel Jeurissen,1 Greet Wuyts,1 Padraic G. Fallon,2 Boon Louis,3 Jan L. Ceuppens,4 and Xavier Bossuyt1*

Department of Medical Diagnostic Sciences, Laboratory of Experimental Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium,1 Department of Biochemistry, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland,2 Bioceros BV, Yalelaan 46, 3584 CM Utrecht, The Netherlands,3 Department of Pathophysiology, Laboratory of Experimental Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium4

Received 20 April 2007/ Returned for modification 31 May 2007/ Accepted 5 September 2007


   ABSTRACT
Top
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Streptococcus pneumoniae is a microorganism that frequently causes serious infections in children, the elderly, and immunocompromised patients. We studied whether the specific intracellular adhesion molecule-grabbing nonintegrin R1 (Sign-R1) receptor, involved in the uptake of capsular polysaccharides (caps-PS) by antigen-presenting cells, is necessary for the antibody response to pneumococcal caps-PS and phosphorylcholine (PC). The antibody response to caps-PS and PC was evaluated after vaccination with soluble caps-PS (Pneumovax) and after vaccination with heat-killed S. pneumoniae. The role of Sign-R1 was investigated by using Sign-R1 knockout mice and anti-Sign-R1 monoclonal antibodies. The immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgG antibody response to PC and caps-PS (serotypes 3 and 14) was not affected by anti-Sign-R1 monoclonal antibodies. The IgM antibody response in Sign-R1 knockout mice was comparable to the antibody response in wild-type mice. The IgG antibody response to serotype 3, but not to serotype 14, tended to be lower in Sign-R1 knockout mice compared to wild-type mice. In conclusion, we found that Sign-R1 is not involved in the IgM antibody production to PC and caps-PS serotype 3 or 14 and the IgG immune response to PC and caps-PS serotype 14. There is no direct relation between capture and uptake of caps-PS serotype 14 by Sign-R1 and the initiation of the anti-caps-PS antibody production in mice.


   INTRODUCTION
Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Streptococcus pneumoniae is a major human pathogen. Infections with, S. pneumoniae result in substantial morbidity and mortality, particularly in young children, the elderly, and immunocompromised patients (16). In various animal species and in humans, protection against infection with S. pneumoniae is mediated by antibodies against the pneumococcal capsular polysaccharides (caps-PS) (2). Vaccination with isolated pneumococcal caps-PS is widely used to protect people against infection with S. pneumoniae (14).

caps-PS are classified as T-lymphocyte-independent type 2 antigens (15). The induction of a humoral immune response to caps-PS is independent of T lymphocytes, but T lymphocytes influence the antibody response to caps-PS (6-8, 15). There are only scarce data available on the role of antigen-presenting cells (APCs) in the immune response to isolated T-lymphocyte-independent type 2 antigens. Garcia de Vinuesa et al. found that administration to mice of agonistic CD40 monoclonal antibodies (MAbs), together with a polysaccharide antigen, not only enhanced the antibody response but also markedly increased the amount of APCs in the spleen (3). It was hypothesized that CD40 MAbs activate APCs, which then would activate T lymphocytes through cytokine secretion (3). Garg et al. showed that, in contrast to in vitro culture of spleen cells, in vitro culture of lymph node cells did not respond to caps-PS and that the addition of APCs isolated from spleen cells enabled the lymph node to respond to caps-PS (4). It was further put forward that defects in APC function might play a critical role in the failure of neonates to respond to caps-PS (1). These data suggest that APCs play a role in the immune response to isolated caps-PS antigens.

In the present study we addressed the question of whether specific intracellular adhesion molecule-grabbing nonintegrin R1 (Sign-R1) is involved in the antibody response to caps-PS. Sign-R1 is a C-lectin that contributes to the uptake of caps-PS by macrophages (5, 18). Sign-R1 is expressed on marginal zone macrophages in the spleen, on medullar and subcapsular macrophages in lymph nodes (5), and on resident peritoneal macrophages (19). It is necessary for the uptake and endocytic internalization of polysaccharides, such as neutral and anodic forms of dextran (with a wide variety of molecular masses [70 to 2,000 kDa]) and Ficoll (10). Sign-R1 also captures encapsulated S. pneumoniae (serotypes 3 and 14) and soluble caps-PS (described for serotypes 14, 23, and 26) (9). The administration of anti-Sign-R1 antibodies inhibited the Sign-R1-mediated uptake of caps-PS or dextrans (9). Taken together, Sign-R1 is considered an important pathogen recognition receptor for uptake and clearance of blood-born antigens in vivo (5). In contrast to wild-type mice, Sign-R1 knockout mice showed increased mortality after intraperitoneal infection with S. pneumoniae (13). It has been suggested that Sign-R1 contributed to protection against pneumococcal infection in mice by clearing the bacteria (9). In contrast to wild-type mice, the knockout mice displayed severely enhanced inflammatory parameters and failed to produce a rapid immunoglobulin M (IgM) anti-phosphorylcholine (anti-PC) response. It was suggested by Koppel et al. (12) that S. pneumoniae was captured by Sign-R1 on marginal zone macrophages for antigen presentation and activation of marginal zone B cells, resulting in an IgM anti-PC response. Lanoue et al. (13), on the other hand, suggested that Sign-R1 contributed to protection against pneumococcal infection in mice by clearing the bacteria and not by reducing the natural IgM anti-PC antibody levels.

In the present study, we investigated whether Sign-R1 is involved in the antibody response to pneumococcal caps-PS and PC.


   MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Materials. Pneumovax, a 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine, was obtained from Aventis Pasteur MSD, Belgium. Pneumococcal caps-PS were obtained from ATCC, Rockville, MD. C-polysaccharide was obtained from Statens Serum Institute, Denmark. NaCl 0.9% was from Vascumed, Ghent, Belgium. Covalink and MaxiSorp ELISA 96-well plates were obtained from Nalge Nunc International, Denmark. Tween 20 was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, N.V/S.A., Bornem, Belgium. Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and goat serum were from Gibco-BRL/Life Technologies, Ltd., Paisley, Scotland. Peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgM and IgG were from Nordic Immunological Laboratories, Tilburg, The Netherlands. 3,3'-5,5'-Tetramethylbenzidine was purchased from Dako Diagnostics, N.V./S.A., Heverlee, Belgium. H2SO4 solution was from Merck KgaA, Darmstadt, Germany. Isoflurane was obtained by Schering-Plough Animal Health, Harefield, Uxbridge, Middlesex, United Kingdom. Heparin Leo was obtained from Leo Pharma, N.V/S.A., Wilrijk, Belgium. The anti-Sign-R1 antibodies (22D1 and ER-TR9) were obtained from Van Kooten P (Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands) and G. Kraal (VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands), respectively. Control hamster and rat antibodies were from Biotrend Chemikalien (Keulen) and were dialyzed (buffer medium PBS) by using a Quixsep microdialyzer from Membrane Filtration Products (Spectrum Europe, Breda, The Netherlands) in order to remove the azides. Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-dextran was obtained from Molecular Probes, Invitrogen, Merelbeke, Belgium.

Mice. BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice were bought at Elevage, Janvier, France. Sign-R1 knockout mice and control C57BL/6 mice were from N. McKenzie (Medical Research Council, Cambridge, United Kingdom) and P. G. Fallon (Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland). The animals were used at age 6 to 8 weeks and were kept under a standard protocol with free access to pelleted food and water. Approval for the study was granted by the local ethics committee of the Catholic University Leuven.

Immunofluorescence analysis. The in vivo FITC-dextran capture and the inhibition of the FITC-dextran capture by SignR-1 was confirmed by immunofluorescence analysis as previously described (5).

Immunization of mice. Mice were immunized with Pneumovax or with heat-killed S. pneumoniae serotype 3 or serotype 14. The vaccine was 1/25 diluted in NaCl 0.9%. A total of 500 µl of this diluted vaccine was given intraperitoneally (i.p.). For immunization with S. pneumoniae, 2 x 108 CFU in 200 µl of PBS were injected i.p. After 14 days, blood was drawn by intracardiac puncture in isoflurane-anesthetized mice. Mice were euthanized after isoflurane inhalation by cervical dislocation. IgM and IgG anti-PC and anti-caps-PS antibodies were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (see below). In the experiments in which transient SignR-1 knockout mice were developed, 200 µg of 22D1 or 2 mg of ER-TR9 was given i.p. In one experiment, 100 µg of 22D1 was given intravenously (i.v.) into the tail vein 1 day before immunization. The control group was injected with 200 µg of hamster IgG i.p., 2 mg of rat IgM i.p., or 100 µg of hamster IgG i.v.

IgM and IgG anti-PC and anti-caps-PS ELISA. Anti-PC antibodies were measured as previously described (20). Anti-caps-PS antibodies were measured as previously described (7). Serum was treated at room temperature for minimum 30 min with pneumococcal C-polysaccharide (5 µg of PBS/ml, 2% goat serum) and caps-PS serotype 22F (5 µg of PBS/ml, 2% goat serum) to remove anti-C-polysaccharide antibodies and non-S. pneumoniae-specific antibodies, respectively.

Statistical analysis. Differences in antibody levels were evaluated by use of the Mann-Whitney U test. A P value of <0.05 was considered significant.


   RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
The role of Sign-R1 in the anti-PC and anti-caps-PS antibody production was evaluated by using the anti-Sign-R1 MAbs 22D1 and ER-TR9. The ability of both MAbs to block Sign-R1 was confirmed by immunofluorescence analysis (5). The results are shown in Fig. 1 and illustrate that the administration of both MAbs inhibited the in vivo binding of FITC-dextran.


Figure 1
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIG. 1. Inhibition of in vivo FITC-dextran capture by anti-SignR-1 MAbs. BALB/c mice were, prior to i.v. injection with FITC-dextran (1 mg/ml), treated with rat IgG (5 µg/ml) (a), 22D1 (5 µg/ml) (b), and ER-TR9 (5 µg/ml) (c) by i.v. injection. Spleens were isolated, and immunofluorescence analysis of spleen tissue sections was performed.

 
The IgM and IgG anti-PC antibody levels were measured after immunization with heat-inactivated S. pneumoniae (serotypes 3 and 14). The IgM anti-PC antibody production was already high at day 4 and peaked between days 7 and 10 after immunization. The IgG anti-PC antibody production displayed similar kinetics, but the antibody levels were much lower than the antibody levels for IgM (data not shown). The IgM and IgG anti-PC antibody production in mice treated with anti-SignR-1 antibodies (ER-TR9 or 22D1) was comparable to the IgM and IgG anti-PC antibody production in mice treated with control antibodies. The IgM anti-PC antibody production at different time points is shown in Fig. 2.


Figure 2
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIG. 2. Effect of treatment with anti-SignR-1 MAb on the in vivo antibody response to pneumococcal PC. Mice were immunized with heat-inactivated S. pneumoniae on day 0 and treated with anti-Sign-R1 (n = 6 [{blacksquare}]) or rat IgG (n = 6 [{square}]) on day 1. The IgM and IgG antibody responses to pneumococcal PC were measured 4, 7, 10, and 14 days after immunization. The results (means ± the standard errors of the mean) show the absorbance values at various serum dilutions and are representative of two independent experiments. P > 0.12, P > 0.29, P > 0.28, and P > 0.49 for the IgM results on days 4, 7, 10, and 14, respectively.

 
In various animal species and in humans, protection against infection with S. pneumoniae is, in addition to natural anti-PC IgM antibodies, mediated by antibodies against the pneumococcal caps-PS (2). In view of the contradictory data with regard to the role of Sign-R1 in the anti-PC antibody production, we investigated the role of Sign-R1 in the IgM and IgG antibody production to caps-PS. Two complementary approaches were used: monoclonal anti-Sign-R1 antibodies and Sign-R1 knockout mice. In a first approach to evaluate the role of Sign-R1 in the anti-caps-PS IgM and IgG antibody response, we studied the effect of administering anti-Sign-R1 MAb. BALB/c mice were immunized with Pneumovax in the presence or absence of ER-TR9 or 22D1. The antibody response to serotypes 3 and 14 was measured after 14 days. The results of the 22D1 treatment are shown in Fig. 3 and indicate that the antibody response in the animals that received anti-Sign-R1 was similar to the antibody response in animals that received a control antibody. Likewise, ER-TR9 treatment did not affect the anti-caps-PS antibody response (data not shown). Administration of a double dose of 22D1 antibody (1 day before vaccination and 6 days after vaccination), in order to ensure prolonged blocking of Sign-R1 (9), did not affect the anti-caps-PS antibody response (data not shown). We also tested the effect of 22D1 administration in C57BL/6 mice and found that such treatment did not affect the anti-caps-PS immune response (six mice/group [data not shown]).


Figure 3
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIG. 3. Effect of treatment with anti-SignR-1 MAb on the in vivo antibody response to pneumococcal caps-PS. Mice were immunized with Pneumovax on day 0 and treated with anti-Sign-R1 (n = 9 [{blacksquare}]) or rat IgG (n = 9 [{square}]) on day 1. The IgM and IgG antibody responses to pneumococcal caps-PS serotypes 3 and 14 were measured 14 days after immunization. The results (means ± the standard errors of the mean) show the absorbance values at various serum dilutions and are pooled from two independent experiments. P > 0.2, P > 0.2, P > 0.4, and P > 0.8 for IgM serotypes 3 and 14 and IgG serotypes 3 and 14, respectively.

 
Similarly, i.v. administration of anti-Sign-R1 did not affect the anti-caps-PS antibody response (data not shown). It has been suggested by Kang et al. that i.p. administration of anti-Sign-R1 MAb primarily eliminated Sign-R1 from the lymph nodes, whereas i.v. administration downregulated Sign-R1 expression in the spleen (9).

Finally, we tested whether anti-Sign-R1 treatment affected the antibody response to caps-PS after immunization with intact heat-inactivated bacteria. BALB/c mice were immunized with heat-inactivated S. pneumoniae (serotypes 3 and 14) in the presence or absence of anti-Sign-R1, and the anti-caps-PS antibody response was measured after 14 days. There was no difference in anti-caps-PS antibody production between the control mice and the 22D1-treated mice (six mice/group [data not shown]).

In a second approach, the anti-caps-PS antibody response in Sign-R1 knockout mice was compared to the antibody response in wild-type mice. The results are shown in Fig. 4. The IgM and IgG response in Sign-R1 knockout mice was comparable to the IgM and IgG response in the wild-type mice for serotype 14. The IgG antibody response to serotype 3 tended to be lower in Sign-R1 knockout mice compared to the C57BL/6 wild-type mice. The IgM response in Sign-R1 knockout mice was comparable to the IgM response in the C57BL/6 wild-type mice for serotype 3.


Figure 4
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIG. 4. Immunization of SignR-1 knockout mice and C57BL/6 wild-type mice with pneumococcal caps-PS. Sign-R1 knockout mice (n = 11 [{blacksquare}]) and C57BL/6 wild-type mice (n = 12 [{square}]) were immunized i.p. with Pneumovax on day 0. The IgM and IgG response to caps-PS serotypes 3 and 14 were measured 14 days after immunization. The results show the absorbance values (means ± the standard errors of the mean) at various dilutions and are pooled from two independent experiments. P > 0.13, P > 0.17, P > 0.08, and P > 0.2 for IgM serotypes 3 and 14 and IgG serotypes 3 and 14, respectively.

 
We found that anti-Sign-R1 treatment did not affect the IgM and IgG anti-PC and anti-caps-PS antibody response for caps-PS serotype 3 and caps-PS serotype 14. Similarly, the IgM and IgG antibody response to caps-PS serotype 14 in Sign-R1 knockout mice was comparable to the antibody response in wild-type mice. For caps-PS serotype 3 the IgM response in Sign-R1 knockout mice was comparable to the antibody response in wild-type mice. The IgG response tended to be lower in Sign-R1 knockout mice compared to wild-type mice.

Our data thus indicate that the Sign-R1 pathway is not involved in the antibody response to pneumococcal caps-PS. Other pathways must be implicated. Sen et al. (17) reported that IgG anti-caps-PS serotype 3 and anti-caps-PS serotype 14 was diminished in Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR-2–/–) mice compared to wild-type mice. This finding might be attributed to the fact that the pneumococcal vaccine contains TLR-2 and TLR-4 ligands that stimulate the IgG response. Kobrynski et al. (11) suggested that CD1, a major histocompatibility complex class I-like molecule expressed on the surface of immature thymocytes, dendritic cells, activated macrophages, and B lymphocytes, is required for the production of IgG anti-caps-PS antibodies (caps-PS serotype 4 and caps-PS serotype 19). These researchers postulated that caps-PS are presented by CD1 molecules expressed on APCs and B cells. CD1-expressing APCs and B cells can elicit helper functions from CD1-responsive effector T cells.

In summary, we found that Sign-R1 is not involved in the IgM and IgG anti-PC antibody production. Moreover, Sign-R1 is also not involved in the IgM antibody production to caps-PS serotype 3 and caps-PS serotype 14, and the IgG immune response to caps-PS serotype 14. There is no direct relation between capture and uptake of caps-PS serotype 14 by SignR-1 and the initiation of IgM and IgG anti-caps-PS serotype 14 production in mice.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This study was supported by grants of the Catholic University Leuven (Onderzoekstoelage) and the FWO (Fund for Scientific Research)-Vlaanderen. X.B. is a senior clinical investigator of the FWO-Vlaanderen.


   FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Experimental Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, CDG 7th floor, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium. Phone: 32 16 34 70 09. Fax: 32 16 34 79 31. E-mail: xavier.bossuyt{at}uz.kuleuven.ac.be Back

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 17 September 2007. Back

Editor: J. N. Weiser


   REFERENCES
Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
1. Bondada, S. H., D. Wu, A. Robertson, and R. L. Chelvarajan. 2001. Accessory cell defect in unresponsiveness of neonates and aged to polysaccharide vaccines. Vaccine 19:557-565.[CrossRef]
2. Bruyn, G. A., B. J. Zegers, and R. Van Furth. 1992. Mechanisms of host defense against infection with Streptococcus pneumoniae. Clin. Infect. Dis. 14:251-262.[Medline]
3. Garcia de Vinuesa, C., I. C. MacLennan, M. Holman, and G. B. Klaus. 1999. Anti-CD40 antibody enhances response to polysaccharide without mimicking T cell help. Eur. J. Immunol. 29:3216-3224.[CrossRef][Medline]
4. Garg, M., A. M. Kaplan, and S. Bondada. 1994. Cellular basis of differential responsiveness of lymph nodes and spleen to 23-valent pneu-immune vaccine. J. Immunol. 152:1589-1596.[Abstract]
5. Geijtenbeek, T. B., P. C. Groot, M. A. Nolte, S. J. van Vliet, S. T. Gangaram-Panday, G. C. van Duijnhoven, G. Kraal, A. J. van Oosterhout, and Y. van Kooyk. 2002. Marginal zone macrophages express a murine homologue of DC-SIGN that captures blood-borne antigens in vivo. Blood 100:2908-2916.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Jeurissen, A., J. L. Ceuppens, and X. Bossuyt. 2004. T lymphocyte dependence of the antibody response to 'T lymphocyte independent type 2' antigens. Immunology 111:1-7.[CrossRef][Medline]
7. Jeurissen, A., G. Wuyts, A. Kasran, S. Murli-Ramdien, L. Boon, J. L. Ceuppens, and X. Bossuyt. 2002. Essential role for CD40 ligand interactions in T lymphocyte mediated modulation of the murine immune response to pneumococcal capsular polysaccharides. J. Immunol. 168:2773-2781.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Jeurissen, A., G. Wuyts, A. Kasran, S. Ramdien-Murli, N. Blanckaert, L. Boon, J. L. Ceuppens, and X. Bossuyt. 2004. The human antibody response to pneumococcal capsular polysaccharides is dependent on the CD40-CD40L interaction. Eur. J. Immunol. 34:850-858.[CrossRef][Medline]
9. Kang, Y. S., J. Y. Kim, S. A. Bruening, M. Pack, A. Charalambous, A. Pritsker, T. M. Moran, J. M. Loeffler, R. M. Steinman, and C. G. Park. 2004. The C-type lectin SIGN-R1 mediates uptake of the capsular polysaccharide of Streptococcus pneumoniae in the marginal zone of mouse spleen. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:215-220.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Kang, Y. S., S. Yamazaki, T. Iyoda, M. Pack, S. A. Bruening, J. Y. Kim, K. Takahara, K. Inaba, R. M. Steinman, and C. G. Park. 2003. SIGN-R1, a novel C-type lectin expressed by marginal zone macrophages in spleen, mediates uptake of the polysaccharide dextran. Int. Immunol. 15:177-186.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Kobrynski, L. J., A. O. Sousa, A. J. Nahmias, and F. K. Lee. 2005. Cutting edge: antibody production to pneumococcal polysaccharides requires CD1 molecules and CD8+ T cells. J. Immunol. 174:1787-1790.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Koppel, E. A., C. W. Wieland, V. C. van den Berg, M. Litjens, S. Florquin, Y. van Kooyk, T. van der Poll, and T. B. Geijtenbeek. 2005. Specific ICAM-3 grabbing nonintegrin-related 1 (SIGNR1) expressed by marginal zone macrophages is essential for defense against pulmonary Streptococcus pneumoniae infection. Eur. J. Immunol. 35:2962-2969.[CrossRef][Medline]
13. Lanoue, A., M. R. Clatworthy, P. Smith, S. Green, M. J. Townsend, E. J. Helen, K. G. Smith, P. G. Fallon, and A. N. McKenzie. 2004. SIGN-R1 contributes to protection against lethal pneumococcal infection in mice. J. Exp. Med. 200:1383-1393.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. MacLeod, C., R. G. Hodges, M. Heidelberger, and W. G. Bernhard. 1945. Prevention of pneumococcal pneumonia by immunization with specific capsular polysaccharides. J. Exp. Med. 82:445-465.[Abstract]
15. Mond, J. J., A. Lees, and C. M. Snapper. 1995. T cell-independent antigens type 2. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 13:655-692.[CrossRef][Medline]
16. Musher, D. M. 1992. Infection caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae: clinical spectrum, pathogenesis, immunity, and treatment. Clin. Infect. Dis. 14:801-807.[Medline]
17. Sen, G., A. Q. Khan, Q. Chen, and C. M. Snapper. 2005. In vivo humoral immune responses to isolated pneumococcal polysaccharides are dependent on the presence of associated TLR ligands. J. Immunol. 175:3084-3091.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Takahara, K., Y. Yashima, Y. Omatsu, H. Yoshida, Y. Kimura, S. Y. Kang, R. M. Steinman, C. G. Park, and K. Inaba. 2004. Functional comparison of the mouse DC-SIGN, SIGNR1, SIGNR3, and Langerin, C-type lectins. Int. Immunol. 16:819-829.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Taylor, P. R., G. D. Brown, J. Herre, D. L. Williams, J. A. Willment, and S. Gordon. 2004. The role of SIGNR1 and the beta-glucan receptor (dectin-1) in the nonopsonic recognition of yeast by specific macrophages. Immunology 172:1157-1162.
20. Wu, Z.-Q., A. Q. Khan, Y. Shen, J. Schartman, R. Peach, A. Lees, J. J. Mond, W. C. Gause, and C. M. Snapper. 2000. B7 requirements for primary and secondary protein- and polysaccharide-specific Ig isotype responses to Streptococcus pneumoniae. J. Immunol. 165:6840-6848.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Infection and Immunity, December 2007, p. 5748-5752, Vol. 75, No. 12
0019-9567/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/IAI.00574-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
IAI.00574-07v1
75/12/5748    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moens, L.
Right arrow Articles by Bossuyt, X.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moens, L.
Right arrow Articles by Bossuyt, X.

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. J. Virol. Eukaryot. Cell
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. All ASM Journals