This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuckleburg, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Czuprynski, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kuckleburg, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Czuprynski, C. J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Infection and Immunity, February 2007, p. 1045-1049, Vol. 75, No. 2
0019-9567/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/IAI.01177-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Expression of Phosphorylcholine by Histophilus somni Induces Bovine Platelet Aggregation{triangledown}

Christopher J. Kuckleburg,1 Shaadi F. Elswaifi,2 Thomas J. Inzana,2 and Charles J. Czuprynski1*

Department of Pathobiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, Wisconsin,1 Center for Molecular Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Virginia-Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia2

Received 26 July 2006/ Returned for modification 13 September 2006/ Accepted 9 November 2006


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
Histophilus somni-induced platelet aggregation was inhibited by antagonists of the platelet-activating factor (PAF) receptor but not inhibitors of PAF synthesis. In addition, H. somni cells expressing phosphorylcholine (ChoP) induced aggregation, while ChoP– H. somni cells did not. This suggests that H. somni ChoP may induce platelet aggregation via interactions with the PAF receptor.


arrow
TEXT
 
Histophilus somni is a gram-negative pleomorphic bacillus that causes respiratory disease primarily in cattle. Clinical signs of H. somni infection can include pneumonia, abortion, arthritis, septicemia, myocarditis, vasculitis, and an acute condition known as thrombotic meningoencephalitis (1, 3, 8, 10, 13).

The ability of H. somni to modify its lipooligosaccharide (LOS) composition and structure is thought to play an important role in its virulence. H. somni can incorporate sialic acid into the outer core of the LOS molecule, and this event has been shown to be critical for resistance to serum-mediated killing (14). It has been reported that some strains of H. somni that do not incorporate sialic acid are unable to produce disease (5). Another modification is the addition of phosphorylcholine (ChoP) to the outer core of the LOS (12).

H. somni exhibits extensive intrastrain variability in ChoP incorporation into the LOS molecule (12). The possible contribution of ChoP to H. somni pathogenesis is unknown. For other species of bacteria, ChoP can be incorporated into bacterial structures such as fibrillar proteins and cell wall components that are important for bacterial adherence to host cells. For example, the expression of ChoP by Streptococcus pneumoniae has been reported to contribute to pneumococcal adherence and invasion in the lung (6, 30) and the brain (20). Similarly, the expression of ChoP on the LOS of Haemophilus influenzae contributes to its binding and internalization by human epithelial cells (27, 28). This adherence was demonstrated to be due to an interaction between ChoP expressed on LOS and the platelet-activating factor (PAF) receptor on epithelial cells. ChoP has also been found in Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, which facilitates binding to the PAF receptor on human vascular endothelial cells, followed by internalization of the bacteria (7, 23, 24). ChoP has also been detected in Bacillus spp. and Clostridium spp., and the lipopolysaccharide of Escherichia coli O26:B6 was found to activate human platelets through a PAF receptor-dependent pathway (9, 19).

Our laboratory has previously reported that H. somni and its LOS can activate bovine platelets (16). We also found that H. somni, but not its LOS, could induce platelet aggregation. The mechanism by which H. somni induces platelet aggregation is unknown. It has previously been demonstrated that endotoxin and bacteria can adhere to and activate platelets from several different mammalian species (2, 11, 18, 21, 22, 31-33). For this study, we sought to investigate the interaction between H. somni and bovine platelets and determine if bacterial expression of ChoP affects platelet activation.

We first wanted to ascertain whether platelet aggregation was induced by ChoP-expressing H. somni cells. Using colony immunoblotting with an anti-phosphorylcholine antibody (15), two H. somni variants of strain 7735 were selected for either high or low expression of ChoP. These populations were enriched through selective passage in culture. Bovine platelets (2.5 x 108 platelets) (isolation procedures were described previously [16]) were incubated with one of the two H. somni variants (multiplicity of infection [MOI] of 5:1) for 10 min in a Chronolog aggregometer. As a positive control, platelets were treated with PAF (10–6 M; Calbiochem) to induce irreversible aggregation within 5 min. It was found that ChoP+ H. somni induced platelet aggregation, while ChoP– H. somni did not (Fig. 1A and B). ChoP+ H. somni consistently induced approximately 15% aggregation, which was not reversible within a 30-min incubation period (data not shown). Upon microscopic examination, platelet aggregates could be observed following incubation with ChoP+ but not with ChoP– H. somni (Fig. 1C and D). In addition, we observed ChoP+ H. somni within bovine platelet aggregates. Pretreatment of ChoP+ H. somni with polymyxin B (10 µg/ml; Sigma) for 10 min resulted in a modest decrease in the ability of H. somni to induce aggregation (Fig. 1E).


Figure 1
View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIG. 1. ChoP+ but not ChoP– H. somni induces bovine platelet aggregation. Platelets (500 µl, 2.5 x 108 platelets/ml) were placed in siliconized glass cuvettes and incubated with ChoP+ or ChoP– H. somni (MOI of 5:1) or with PAF (10–6 M) as a positive control. Platelet aggregation was measured for 10 min using the turbidimetric method in a Chrono-Log Model 560-Ca Dual Sample Lumi-Ionized Calcium aggregometer, and the percent aggregation was calculated using AGGRO/LINK software. The aggregation plot in A is a representative experiment of four separate experiments that were performed. The data in B illustrate the means ± standard errors of the means (SEM) of four separate experiments showing the percent aggregation induced at 10 min (*, P < 0.05 compared to ChoP+ H. somni-treated platelets). For some aggregation experiments, platelets were removed from the cuvette and transferred onto glass coverslips using a Cytospin centrifuge before being fixed and stained with Diff-Quick. These platelets were then observed by light microscopy for the presence platelet-bacterium aggregates (C and D). We observed such aggregates in the presence of ChoP+ but not ChoP– H. somni. Preincubation of ChoP+ H. somni for 10 min with polymyxin B (PB) (10 µg/ml) inhibited platelet aggregation (E). These data represent the means ± SEM of four separate experiments (*, P < 0.05 compared to ChoP+-treated platelets). PBS, phosphate-buffered saline.

We next considered the possibility that H. somni may interact with the PAF receptor on platelets. To exclude the contribution of platelet-derived PAF, we incubated platelets with previously described selective inhibitors of phospholipase A2, AACOCF3 (10 µM; Calbiochem) or cPLA (10 µM; Calbiochem), for 10 min prior to the addition of ChoP+ H. somni (17, 26). Some platelets were preincubated with the PAF receptor antagonist WEB 2170 (10 µg/ml) at a concentration that was previously demonstrated to inhibit platelet activation by PAF (29). Platelets preincubated with WEB 2170 but not inhibitors of PAF synthesis demonstrated a significant diminution in platelet aggregation following incubation with ChoP+ H. somni (Fig. 2).


Figure 2
View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIG. 2. Platelet aggregation is inhibited by the PAF receptor antagonist WEB 2170. Platelets (500 µl, 2.5 x 108 platelets/ml) were pretreated for 10 min with the PAF receptor antagonist WEB 2170 (10 µg/ml) or the PAF synthesis inhibitor AACOCF (10 µM) or cPLA (10 µM) before incubation with ChoP+ H. somni (MOI of 5:1). Platelet aggregation was then measured as described in the legend of Fig. 1. The data represent the means ± SEM of four separate experiments (*, P < 0.05 compared to platelets incubated with ChoP+ H. somni alone).

To study PAF receptor signaling, we used an inhibitor of downstream signaling through phospholipase Cß (D609, 200 µM; Calbiochem) and the PAF receptor antagonist WEB 2170 (10 µg/ml). Using an antibody against P-selectin as a marker of platelet activation (BD Bioscience), we observed low baseline P-selectin levels in unstimulated platelets. Following incubation with PAF (10–7 M) or ChoP+ H. somni (MOI of 5:1), we observed a significant increase in platelet activation (Fig. 3A and B). However, neither PAF antagonist resulted in a significant decrease in platelet P-selectin expression induced by ChoP+ H. somni, suggesting that PAF receptor activation is not required for platelet activation by ChoP+ H. somni. In addition, D609 inhibited PAF-induced aggregation but not aggregation induced by ChoP+ H. somni (data not shown). We next compared platelet activation in response to ChoP+ or ChoP– H. somni as determined by flow cytometry evaluation of P-selectin expression and fibrinogen binding. The latter event, which is required for platelet aggregation, was detected using an antibody against platelet-bound fibrinogen (American Diagnostica, Stamford, CT). We found that both ChoP+ and ChoP– H. somni cells induced significant platelet P-selectin expression (Fig. 3C). Surprisingly, ChoP+ H. somni did not induce a significant level of platelet fibrinogen binding compared to platelets stimulated with PAF. The lack of fibrinogen binding suggests that H. somni may induce platelet aggregate formation using a mechanism distinct from activation induced by PAF.


Figure 3
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIG. 3. H. somni-induced platelet activation is independent of PAF receptor signaling. Bovine platelets (2.5 x 108) were incubated for 10 min at 37°C with ChoP+ or ChoP– H. somni (MOI of 5:1) or PAF (10–7 M). The platelets were then fixed in paraformaldehyde (0.4% final volume) and stained with antibodies for P-selectin or fibrinogen before being analyzed by flow cytometry. The results reflect the means± SEM of percent positive platelets from at least three separate experiments. (A) Platelets preincubated with the PAF receptor antagonist WEB 2170 or the phospholipase Cß inhibitor D609 expressed significantly less P-selectin after PAF stimulation than platelets treated with PAF alone (*, P < 0.05 compared to untreated platelets). (B) Pretreatment of platelets with WEB 2170 or D609 resulted in a modest decrease in P-selection expression in platelets challenged with H. somni; however, this decrease was not significant (P > 0.05 compared to platelets incubated with ChoP+ H. somni alone). Panel C illustrates that platelets incubated with either ChoP+ or ChoP– H. somni significantly up-regulated platelet P-selectin expression. However, neither strain was able to induce significant levels of platelet fibrinogen binding compared to untreated platelets (*, P < 0.05 compared to untreated platelets).

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was used to visualize whether the expression of ChoP by H. somni affected the adherence of the bacteria to platelets or platelet morphology. Bovine platelets were incubated with ChoP+ or ChoP– H. somni for 10 min before being fixed and embedded for TEM. Unactivated platelets demonstrated their characteristic discoid shape, with no significant changes in morphology (Fig. 4A). Following incubation with ChoP+ or ChoP– H. somni, bovine platelets exhibited spreading, pseudopod formation, and changes in morphology indicative of platelet activation (Fig. 4B). Although platelet spreading and pseudopod formation were observed following exposure to either ChoP+ or ChoP– H. somni, only ChoP+ H. somni cells were capable of inducing platelet aggregation (Fig. 4C and D). In addition, obvious binding of platelets to ChoP+ H. somni only was observed. Closer examination of this interaction revealed surface structures on ChoP+ H. somni that appeared to facilitate the adherence of the bacteria to the platelets (Fig. 4E and F).


Figure 4
View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIG. 4. Transmission electron microscopy of platelets activated by H. somni. Platelets (500 µl, 2.5 x 108 platelets/ml) were placed in siliconized glass cuvettes and incubated with ChoP+ or ChoP– H. somni (MOI of 5:1) in a Chrono-Log Model 560-Ca Dual Sample Lumi-Ionized Calcium aggregometer. After a 10-min incubation, the platelet-rich plasma was fixed with a 25% volume of Karnovsky's solution (2.5% glutaraldehyde, 4% paraformaldehyde) for 10 min at room temperature and then centrifuged onto glass coverslips at 1,500 x g for 10 min to facilitate TEM processing. (A) Unactivated bovine platelets exhibit the typical discoid or "plate" morphology. (B) Shape change and pseudopod formation but no aggregate formation by bovine platelets incubated with ChoP– H. somni. (C and D) Aggregates of bovine platelets incubated with ChoP+ H. somni. (E and F) Platelets incubated with ChoP+ H. somni at greater magnification, with arrows indicating areas of attachment between bovine platelets and H. somni. These results are representative of three separate experiments.

In this study, we demonstrated that ChoP expression by H. somni plays a role in its interactions with bovine platelets. Preincubation of platelets with the PAF receptor antagonist WEB 2170 prevented platelet aggregation. However, the ineffectiveness of downstream PAF receptor signaling inhibitors suggests that PAF receptor signaling was not required for platelet activation or aggregation. One possible explanation may reflect the location of the ChoP molecule on H. somni LOS, where it is coupled to the primary glucose residue that is bound to heptose I (4). Steric interference from sugars in the outer core may make ChoP less accessible to interactions with the extracellular environment. In contrast, the ChoP group on H. influenza LOS is located on a terminal glycose on either heptose I or heptose III, where it may be more accessible for PAF receptor binding (25). Our findings suggest that H. somni may interact with the PAF receptor, but the resulting events are dissimilar to those by which PAF activates platelets. Upon careful examination, we conclude that aggregation reflected cross-linking between platelets and bacteria, a response that was not observed in bacteria that lacked ChoP (Fig. 1C and D and 4B to D). Future work will be directed at determining if H. somni ChoP interacts directly with the PAF receptor or through another platelet receptor and how these interactions may contribute to platelet activation.

Statistical analysis. An unbalanced one-way analysis of variance was used to determine if significant variation existed between group means. Pairwise comparisons of group means were performed using Tukey's test (P < 0.05) with the Prism 4 statistical package (GraphPad, San Diego, CA).


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This work was supported by funding from the University of Wisconsin School of Veterinary Medicine, the Wisconsin Agriculture Experiment Station (project 3094), and the United States Department of Agriculture National Research Initiative (2005-35204-16169 to C.J.C. and 2003-35204-13637 to T.J.I.).

We thank Yongjing Li for help in preparing samples for transmission electron microscopy. WEB 2170 was generously provided by Boehringer-Ingelheim (Ridgefield, CT).


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Pathobiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, 2015 Linden Drive West, Madison, WI 53706. Phone and fax: (608) 262-8102. E-mail: czuprync{at}svm.vetmed.wisc.edu. Back

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 21 November 2006. Back

Editor: J. N. Weiser


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Andrews, J. J., T. D. Anderson, L. N. Slife, and G. W. Stevenson. 1985. Microscopic lesions associated with the isolation of Haemophilus somnus from pneumonic bovine lungs. Vet. Pathol. 22:131-136.[Abstract]
    2. 2
  2. Clawson, C. C., J. G. White, and M. C. Herzberg. 1980. Platelet interaction with bacteria. VI. contrasting the role of fibrinogen and fibronectin.Am. J. Hematol. 9:43-53.[Medline]
    3. 3
  3. Corbeil, L. B., J. E. Arthur, P. R. Widders, J. W. Smith, and A. F. Barbet.1987 . Antigenic specificity of convalescent serum from cattle with Haemophilus somnus-induced experimental abortion.Infect. Immun. 55:1381-1386.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    4. 4
  4. Cox, A. D., M. D. Howard, J. R. Brisson, M. van der Zwan, P. Thibault, M. B. Perry, and T. J. Inzana. 1998. Structural analysis of the phase-variable lipooligosaccharide from Haemophilus somnus strain 738. Eur. J. Biochem. 253:507-516.[Medline]
    5. 5
  5. Cox, A. D., M. D. Howard, and T. J. Inzana. 2003. Structural analysis of the lipooligosaccharide from the commensal Haemophilus somnus strain 1P. Carbohydr. Res. 338:1223-1228.[CrossRef][Medline]
    6. 6
  6. Cundell, D. R., N. P. Gerard, C. Gerard, I. Idanpaan-Heikkila, and E. I. Tuomanen. 1995. Streptococcus pneumoniae anchor to activated human cells by the receptor for platelet-activating factor. Nature 377:435-438.[CrossRef][Medline]
    7. 7
  7. Fillon, S., K. Soulis, S. Rajasekaran, H. Benedict-Hamilton, J. N. Radin, C. J. Orihuela, K. C. El Kasmi, G. Murti, D. Kaushal, M. W. Gaber, J. R. Weber, P. J. Murray, and E. I. Tuomanen. 2006. Platelet-activating factor receptor and innate immunity: uptake of gram-positive bacterial cell wall into host cells and cell-specific pathophysiology. J. Immunol. 177:6182-6191.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    8. 8
  8. Gogolewski, R. P., C. W. Leathers, H. D. Liggitt, and L. B. Corbeil. 1987. Experimental Haemophilus somnus pneumonia in calves and immunoperoxidase localization of bacteria. Vet. Pathol. 24:250-256.[Abstract]
    9. 9
  9. Harnett, W., and M. M. Harnett. 1999. Phosphorylcholine: friend or foe of the immune system? Immunol. Today 20:125-129.[CrossRef][Medline]
    10. 10
  10. Harris, F. W., and E. D. Janzen. 1984. The Haemophilus somnus disease complex (haemophilosis): a review.Can. Vet. J. 30:816-822.
    11. 11
  11. Houlihan, R. B., and A. L. Copley. 1946. The adhesion of rabbit platelets to bacteria. J. Bacteriol. 52:439-448.[Free Full Text]
    12. 12
  12. Howard, M. D., A. D. Cox, J. N. Weiser, G. G. Schurig, and T. J. Inzana.2000 . Antigenic diversity of Haemophilus somnus lipooligosaccharide: phase-variable accessibility of the phosphorylcholine epitope. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:4412-4419.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    13. 13
  13. Humphrey, J. D., P. B. Little, D. A. Barnum, P. A. Doig, L. R. Stephens, and J. Thorsen. 1982. Occurrence of "Haemophilus somnus" in bovine semen and in the prepuce of bulls and steers. Can. J. Comp. Med. 46:215-217.[Medline]
    14. 14
  14. Inzana, T. J., G. Glindemann, A. D. Cox, W. Wakarchuk, and M. D. Howard. 2002. Incorporation of N-acetylneuraminic acid into Haemophilus somnus lipooligosaccharide (LOS): enhancement of resistance to serum and reduction of LOS antibody binding. Infect. Immun. 70:4870-4879.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    15. 15
  15. Inzana, T. J., R. P. Gogolewski, and L. B. Corbeil. 1992. Phenotypic phase variation in Haemophilus somnus lipooligosaccharide during bovine pneumonia and after in vitro passage. Infect. Immun. 60:2943-2951.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    16. 16
  16. Kuckleburg, C. J., M. J. Sylte, T. J. Inzana, L. B. Corbeil, B. J. Darien, and C. J. Czuprynski. 2005. Bovine platelets activated by Haemophilus somnus and its LOS induce apoptosis in bovine endothelial cells. Microb. Pathog. 38:23-32.[CrossRef][Medline]
    17. 17
  17. Lockhart, L. K., C. Pampolina, B. R. Nickolaychuk, and A. McNicol. 2001. Evidence for a role for phospholipase C, but not phospholipase A2, in platelet activation in response to low concentrations of collagen. Thromb. Haemost. 85:882-889.[Medline]
    18. 18
  18. Malhotra, R., R. Priest, M. R. Foster, and M. I. Bird.1998 . P-selectin binds to bacterial lipopolysaccharide.Eur. J. Immunol. 28:983-988.[CrossRef][Medline]
    19. 19
  19. Nystrom, M. L., M. A. Barradas, J. Y. Jeremy, and D. P. Mikhailidis. 1994. Platelet shape change in whole blood: differential effects of endotoxin.Thromb. Haemost. 71:646-650.[Medline]
    20. 20
  20. Ring, A., J. N. Weiser, and E. I. Tuomanen.1998 . Pneumococcal trafficking across the blood-brain barrier. Molecular analysis of a novel bidirectional pathway.J. Clin. Investig. 102:347-360.[Medline]
    21. 21
  21. Salden, H. J., and B. M. Bas. 1994. Endotoxin binding to platelets in blood from patients with a sepsis syndrome. Clin. Chem. 40:1575-1579.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    22. 22
  22. Saluk-Juszczak, J., B. Wachowicz, and W. Kaca. 2000. Endotoxins stimulate generation of superoxide radicals and lipid peroxidation in blood platelets. Microbios 103:17-25.[Medline]
    23. 23
  23. Schenkein, H. A., S. E. Barbour, C. R. Berry, B. Kipps, and J. G. Tew. 2000. Invasion of human vascular endothelial cells by Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans via the receptor for platelet-activating factor. Infect. Immun. 68:5416-5419.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    24. 24
  24. Schenkein, H. A., C. R. Berry, D. Purkall, J. A. Burmeister, C. N. Brooks, and J. G. Tew.2001 . Phosphorylcholine-dependent cross-reactivity between dental plaque bacteria and oxidized low-density lipoproteins.Infect. Immun. 69:6612-6617.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    25. 25
  25. Schweda, E. K., J. R. Brisson, G. Alvelius, A. Martin, J. N. Weiser, D. W. Hood, E. R. Moxon, and J. C. Richards. 2000. Characterization of the phosphocholine-substituted oligosaccharide in lipopolysaccharides of type b Haemophilus influenzae.Eur. J. Biochem. 267:3902-3913.[Medline]
    26. 26
  26. Seno, K., T. Okuno, K. Nishi, Y. Murakami, F. Watanabe, T. Matsuura, M. Wada, Y. Fujii, M. Yamada, T. Ogawa, T. Okada, H. Hashizume, M. Kii, S. Hara, S. Hagishita, S. Nakamoto, K. Yamada, Y. Chikazawa, M. Ueno, I. Teshirogi, T. Ono, and M. Ohtani. 2000. Pyrrolidine inhibitors of human cytosolic phospholipase A(2). J. Med. Chem. 43:1041-1044.[CrossRef][Medline]
    27. 27
  27. Swords, W. E., B. A. Buscher, K. Ver Steeg Ii, A. Preston, W. A. Nichols, J. N. Weiser, B. W. Gibson, and M. A. Apicella. 2000. Non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae adhere to and invade human bronchial epithelial cells via an interaction of lipooligosaccharide with the PAF receptor. Mol. Microbiol. 37:13-27.[CrossRef][Medline]
    28. 28
  28. Swords, W. E., M. R. Ketterer, J. Shao, C. A. Campbell, J. N. Weiser, and M. A. Apicella.2001 . Binding of the non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae lipooligosaccharide to the PAF receptor initiates host cell signalling. Cell. Microbiol. 3:525-536.[CrossRef][Medline]
    29. 29
  29. Teng, C. M., S. M. Yu, F. N. Ko, C. C. Chen, W. C. Wang, K. Y. Chen, Y. L. Huang, and T. F. Huang. 1991. Comparison of the actions of some platelet-activating factor antagonists on platelets and aortic smooth muscles. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 205:151-156.[CrossRef][Medline]
    30. 30
  30. Tuomanen, E. 1999. Molecular and cellular biology of pneumococcal infection. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2:35-39.[CrossRef][Medline]
    31. 31
  31. Wachowicz, B., J. Saluk, and W. Kaca. 1998. Response of blood platelets to Proteus mirabilis lipopolysaccharide.Microbiol. Immunol. 42:47-49.[Medline]
    32. 32
  32. Washida, S. 1978. Endotoxin receptor site. I. Binding of endotoxin to platelets. Acta Med. Okayama 32:159-167.
    33. 33
  33. Washida, S. 1978. Endotoxin receptor site. II. Specificity of endotoxin receptor of platelets and sensitivity to endotoxin in vivo.Acta Med. Okayama 32:217-223.

Infection and Immunity, February 2007, p. 1045-1049, Vol. 75, No. 2
0019-9567/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/IAI.01177-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuckleburg, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Czuprynski, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kuckleburg, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Czuprynski, C. J.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»