| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Departamento de Microbiología, Parasitología e Inmunología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, C1121ABG Buenos Aires, Argentina,1 Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela, INTA, CP2300 Santa Fe, Argentina2
Received 1 August 2006/ Returned for modification 11 October 2006/ Accepted 20 November 2006
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The pathogenesis of S. aureus infection is very complex. The agr (accessory gene regulator) locus is a quorum-sensing system that controls the expression of a variety of genes involved in tissue colonization (e.g., surface proteins) and invasion (e.g., extracellular toxins). Among other virulence factors, capsular polysaccharide (CP) is an important surface component that is up-regulated by agr during the postexponential growth phase (22). The importance of CP to internalization within cells of the infected host is underscored by the finding that reduced or absent CP expression enhances the adherence of S. aureus bacteria to endothelial cells (24). S. aureus specificity agr groups were defined based upon the polymorphisms of agrC, agrD, and agrB (14). There is mutual cross-inhibition between S. aureus isolates from different groups of the agr system (15). Several authors have described distinct agr alleles in S. aureus, as defined by agr restriction fragment length polymorphism, within agr groups (6, 8, 10).
Since a limited number of clones have been found in bovines with mastitis in different regions of the world (4, 11, 33), this study was aimed at ascertaining the prevalence of the different agr groups in S. aureus bacteria isolated from bovines with mastitis in Argentina and whether a given agr group was associated with MAC-T cell invasion and in vivo persistence.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
agr::tetM) was transduced using
11 lysates of the original agr mutant RN6911 into bovine strains RA19 and RA8. Transductants did not show hemolysis on rabbit and sheep blood agar and did not produce RNAIII, as assessed by reverse transcription-PCR. Genomic DNA extraction. Chromosomal DNA was purified from bovine S. aureus isolates after bacterial lysis with lysostaphin (5 µg/ml) and lysozyme (10 µg/ml) (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) by the method of Pitcher et al. (23).
Multiplex PCR. The agr groups were determined by a multiplex PCR described previously by Gilot et al. (7). Briefly, purified nucleic acids (1 ng/µl) were amplified in a 25-µl reaction mixture containing 0.25 U/µl of Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen Corp., CA), 200 µM deoxynucleoside triphosphates (Promega, Madison, WI), 5 mM MgCl2, and the following primers (0.3 µM): Pan (5'-ATG CAC ATG GTG CAC ATG C-3'), agr1 (5'-GTC ACA AGT ACT ATA AGC TGC GAT-3'), agr2 (5'-TAT TAC TAA TTG AAA AGT GGC CAT AGC-3'), agr3 (5'-GTA ATG TAA TAG CTT GTA TAA TAA TAC CCA G-3'), and agr4 (5'-CGA TAA TGC CGT AAT ACC CG-3'). Multiplex PCRs were performed in an Eppendorf thermal cycler (Mastercycler Gradient) for 1 cycle at 94°C for 1 min; 26 cycles at 94°C for 30 sec, 55°C for 30 sec, and 72°C for 1 min; and finally 1 cycle at 72°C for 10 min. Amplification products were subjected to electrophoresis in a 1.5% agarose gel containing ethidium bromide and visualized by transillumination under UV.
Restriction fragment length polymorphism of the agr variable region. Amplification of the agr locus variable region by PCR was performed using primers B1 (5'-TAT GCT CCT GCA GCA ACT AA-3') and C2 (5'-CTT GCG CAT TTC GTT GTT GA-3') as described by van Leeuwen et al. (37). Genomic DNA was amplified in a 100-µl reaction mixture containing Taq DNA polymerase (2.5 U) (Invitrogen), 200 µM deoxynucleoside triphosphates, 0.5 µM primers, and 2.2 mM MgCl2. Reactions were performed for 1 cycle at 94°C for 4 min; 40 cycles at 94°C for 1 min, 50°C for 1 min, and 74°C for 2 min; and finally 1 cycle at 74°C for 3 min. Samples were stored at 20°C before restriction. Then, agr amplicons (1,070-bp variable region of the agr operon) were restricted with RsaI (Promega) and AluI (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The restriction fragments were separated by electrophoresis on a 3% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide and visualized by transillumination under UV. agr alleles were defined and recorded according to the restriction patterns obtained with RsaI (capital letters) and AluI (arabic numbers).
Cell culture. The established bovine mammary epithelial cell line (MAC-T) (13) was generously provided by Nexia Biotechnologies (Quebec, Canada). MAC-T cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Gibco BRL, Grand Island, NY) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Gibco BRL), insulin (5 µg/ml), hydrocortisone (5 µg/ml), penicillin (100 U/ml), and streptomycin sulfate (100 µg/ml) (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO). Prior to each experiment, MAC-T cells were seeded at 6 x 104 cells/well in 24-well tissue culture plates and grown for 3 days at 37°C with 6% CO2.
Internalization assays. Confluent MAC-T cell monolayers (approximately 2 x 105 to 2.5 x 105 cells/well) were washed four times with sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and then inoculated with bacteria suspended in fresh growth medium without antibiotics (invasion medium) to produce multiplicities of infection of 10 to 40. After incubation for 1 h at 37°C under 6% CO2, the wells were washed with PBS and then 1 ml of invasion medium supplemented with 100 µg of gentamicin (Sigma) was added to each well to kill extracellular bacteria. Incubation of cocultures with gentamicin proceeded for an additional 2 h at 37°C with 6% CO2. Supernatants were then collected and plated on trypticase soy agar (TSA) to verify the killing by gentamicin. The monolayer was washed four times with sterile PBS, treated for 5 min at 37°C with 100 µl of 0.25% trypsin-0.1% EDTA (Gibco BRL), and lysed by the addition of 900 µl of 0.025% Triton X-100 (USB, Cleveland, OH) in sterile distilled water to release intracellular staphylococci. The CFU number was determined by quantitative plating on TSA. MAC-T cell viability was evaluated by trypan blue exclusion.
Mouse ima infection model. Outbred CF1 mice were bred and kept in the vivarium of the Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Animals were maintained according to the guidelines set forth by the National Institutes of Health Research Council (20). Seven to 10 days after parturition, groups of lactating female mice were inoculated with 0.05 ml of the bacterial suspension in physiologic saline solution (1 x 106 CFU/gland) by the intramammary (ima) route, as described previously (34). After 1 and 4 days, the left and right fourth (L4 and R4) mammary glands were aseptically removed and homogenized. Viable counts were performed on these homogenates by plating the samples on TSA. The experimental mouse model utilized in this study was recently validated as an experimental approach to the study of bovine mastitis (3).
Statistical analysis. Multiple comparisons of intracellular-CFU/ml counts between agr groups were performed by the Kruskal-Wallis test. Nonparametrical data were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney test using GraphPad software (version 2.2; PRISM). P values lower than 0.05 were considered significant.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The ability of S. aureus to invade and survive in different cell types may contribute to persistence of the bacteria in the bovine mammary gland. In the present study, the bovine S. aureus strains defined as being in agr group I showed increased abilities to invade MAC-T cells. Conversely, isolates of agr groups II, III and IV were internalized less efficiently. Mullarky et al. demonstrated that less frequently isolated S. aureus agr genotypes from bovines were also the genotypes more efficiently attacked by bovine neutrophils (19). In agreement with the authors, we suggest that bovine S. aureus strains defined as being in agr group II, III, or IV may be more susceptible to attack by the host immune response because they tend to remain in larger numbers in the extracellular environment. In fact, agr group II or IV S. aureus strains were cleared more efficiently than agr group I strains from the murine mammary gland. Previous studies have shown that inactivation of the agr system provokes an increased capacity for cell invasion (39). Other authors have found that the agr system is not active during chronic infections (9). As expected, abrogation of the agr system in bovine agr group I S. aureus strains resulted in the absence of CP expression. In addition, the agr-null mutant from capsulated strain RA8 exhibited an increased ability to invade MAC-T cells. Interestingly, the internalization of the acapsular RA19 strain was significantly increased when the strain was converted into an agr-null mutant, and the agr-null RA19 mutant was internalized more efficiently than the agr-null RA8 mutant. In the light of the observations made in the present study, we could speculate that the high capacity of S. aureus agr group I to invade MAC-T cells might be due to specifically suppressed action of the agr locus. However, the agr systems in all bovine S. aureus strains investigated in this study were functional in vitro. Therefore, differences in the degrees of internalization should be attributed to another factor(s). Pragman et al. (25) suggested that under low-oxygen conditions in the S. aureus-infected mammary gland (18), the srrAB system would be activated, inducing down-regulation of the agr system. Under such a condition, capsule production (as well as production of other active exoproducts) would be inhibited and internalization would be favored. Whether the activity of the agr system is relevant to the outcome of infection in the bovine clinical strains of S. aureus is not completely understood and deserves to be studied more exhaustively.
Previous studies addressing agr groups of S. aureus isolates are difficult to interpret because they were performed with samples of various sizes, encompassing dissimilar groups of isolates, i.e., methicillin-sensitive and -resistant S. aureus, from different hosts (humans, bovines), from different geographical regions, and suffering different diseases. One major advantage of our study is that it was conducted on an S. aureus population of increased homogeneity with regard to geographical region (Argentina), host involved (bovines), disease (mastitis), and antibiotic susceptibility (methicillin-sensitive S. aureus). Our results showed that a defined S. aureus lineage (agr group I, allele type A/1, mostly NT) was highly prevalent in bovines in Argentina, which lends support to the hypothesis that a few "specialized" S. aureus clones are responsible for most cases of bovine mastitis (38). This hypothesis is further supported by the study of Smith et al. (30), who described in that 87.4% of 262 bovine isolates (231 from the United States, 20 from Chile, and 11 from the United Kingdom) belonged in a single clonal complex, as defined by multilocus sequence typing. Whether the Argentine clone represented by agr group I S. aureus isolates has significant identity with the bovine clonal complex CC97 described by Smith et al. is not known and deserves further investigation. These S. aureus clones may bear a number of selected accessory elements, including individual virulence factors and pathogenicity islands, which would confer host specificity. Different hypotheses have been conceived to explain the underlying genetic basis of the evolution leading to the selection of such specialized clones (8, 17, 27, 40). The issue still remains a matter of controversy and becomes even more complicated by new insights into the plasticity of the S. aureus genome (9). Whether there are factors responsible for selective pressure leading to the emergence of noncapsulated agr group I S. aureus bacteria with increased capacities for internalization within epithelial cells remains undisclosed and merits further investigation.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported in part by grants from ANPCyT (PICT 08/11740 and PICT 05/10648), CONICET (PIP5933), and Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBACyT M-009), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Published ahead of print on 4 December 2006. ![]()
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Almeida, R. A., K. R. Matthews, E. Cifrian, A. J. Guidry, and S. P. Oliver. 1996. Staphylococcus aureus invasion of bovine mammary epithelial cells. J. Dairy Sci. 79:1021-1026.[Abstract] |
| 2. | Bannerman, T. L. 2003. Staphylococcus, Micrococcus and other catalase-positive cocci that grow aerobically, p. 384-404. In P. R. Murray, E. J. Baron, J. H. Jorgensen, M. A. Pfaller, and R. H. Yolken (ed.), Manual of clinical microbiology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC. |
| 3. | Brouillette, E., and F. Malouin. 2005. The pathogenesis and control of Staphylococcus aureus-induced mastitis: study models in the mouse. Microbes Infect. 7:560-568.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 4. | Buzzola, F. R., L. Quelle, M. I. Gomez, M. Catalano, L. Steele-Moore, D. Berg, E. Gentilini, G. Denamiel, and D. O. Sordelli. 2001. Genotypic analysis of Staphylococcus aureus from milk of dairy cows with mastitis in Argentina. Epidemiol. Infect. 126:445-452.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 5. | Cocchiaro, J. L., M. I. Gómez, A. Risley, R. Solinga, D. O. Sordelli, and J. C. Lee. 2006. Molecular characterization of the capsule locus from non-typeable Staphylococcus aureus. Mol. Microbiol. 59:948-960.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 6. | Dufour, P., S. Jarraud, F. Vandenesch, T. Greenland, R. P. Novick, M. Bes, J. Etienne, and G. Lina. 2002. High genetic variability of the agr locus in Staphylococcus species. J. Bacteriol. 184:1180-1186. |
| 7. | Gilot, P., G. Lina, T. Cochard, and B. Poutrel. 2002. Analysis of the genetic variability of genes encoding the RNAIII-activating components Agr and TRAP in a population of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from cows with mastitis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:4060-4067. |
| 8. | Gilot, P., and W. van Leeuwen. 2004. Comparative analysis of agr locus diversification and overall genetic variability among bovine and human Staphylococcus aureus isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:1265-1269. |
| 9. | Goerke, C., and C. Wolz. 2004. Regulatory and genomic plasticity of Staphylococcus aureus during persistent colonization and infection. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 294:195-202.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 10. | Goerke, C., S. Esser, M. Kummel, and C. Wolz. 2005. Staphylococcus aureus strain designation by agr and cap polymorphism typing and delineation of agr diversification by sequence analysis. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 295:67-75.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 11. | Han, H. R., S. I. Pak, S. W. Kang, W. S. Jong, and C. J. Youn. 2000. Capsular polysaccharide typing of domestic mastitis-causing Staphylococcus aureus strains and its potential exploration of bovine mastitis vaccine development. I. Capsular polysaccharide typing, isolation and purification of the strains. J. Vet. Sci. 1:53-60.[Medline] |
| 12. | Hebert, A., K. Sayasith, S. Senechal, P. Dubreuil, and J. Lagace. 2000. Demonstration of intracellular Staphylococcus aureus in bovine mastitis alveolar cells and macrophages isolated from naturally infected cow milk. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 193:57-62.[Medline] |
| 13. | Huynh, H. T., G. Robitaille, and J. D. Turner. 1991. Establishment of bovine mammary epithelial cells (MAC-T): an in vitro model for bovine lactation. Exp. Cell Res. 197:191-199.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 14. | Jarraud, S., G. J. Lyon, A. M. Figueiredo, L. Gerard, F. Vandenesch, J. Etienne, T. W. Muir, and R. P. Novick. 2000. Exfoliatin-producing strains define a fourth agr specificity group in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 182:6517-6522. |
| 15. | Ji, G., R. Beavis, and R. P. Novick. 1997. Bacterial interference caused by autoinducing peptide variants. Science 276:2027-2030. |
| 16. | Lee, J. C., M. J. Liu, J. Parsonnet, and R. D. Arbeit. 1990. Expression of type 8 capsular polysaccharide and production of toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 are associated among vaginal isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 28:2612-2615. |
| 17. | Lindsay, J. A., C. E. Moore, N. P. Day, S. J. Peacock, A. A. Witney, R. A. Stabler, S. E. Husain, P. D. Butcher, and J. Hinds. 2006. Microarrays reveal that each of the ten dominant lineages of Staphylococcus aureus has a unique combination of surface-associated and regulatory genes. J. Bacteriol. 188:669-679. |
| 18. | Mayer, S. J., A. E. Waterman, P. M. Keen, N. Craven, and F. J. Bourne. 1998. Oxygen concentration in milk of healthy and mastitic cows and implications of low oxygen tension for the killing of Staphylococcus aureus by bovine neutrophils. J. Dairy Res. 55:513-519. |
| 19. | Mullarky, I. K., C. Su, N. Frieze, Y. H. Park, and L. M. Sordillo. 2001. Staphylococcus aureus agr genotypes with enterotoxin production capabilities can resist neutrophil bactericidal activity. Infect. Immun. 69:45-51. |
| 20. | National Research Council. 1996. Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals (NIH guide, revised). National Research Council, Washington, DC. |
| 21. | Nickerson, S., W. Owens, and R. Bodie. 1995. Mastitis in dairy heifers: initial studies on prevalence and control. J. Dairy Sci. 78:1607-1618.[Abstract] |
| 22. | O'Riordan, K., and J. C. Lee. 2004. Staphylococcus capsular polysaccharide. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 17:218-234. |
| 23. | Pitcher, D., N. Saundres, and R. Owen. 1989. Rapid extraction of bacterial genomic DNA with guanidium thiocyanate. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 8:151-153. |
| 24. | Pohlmann-Dietze, P., M. Ulrich, K. B. Kiser, G. Doring, J. C. Lee, J. M. Fournier, K. Botzenhart, and C. Wolz. 2000. Adherence of Staphylococcus aureus to endothelial cells: influence of capsular polysaccharide, global regulator agr, and bacterial growth phase. Infect. Immun. 68:4865-4871. |
| 25. | Pragman, A. A., J. M. Yarwood, T. J. Tripp, and P. M. Schlievert. 2004. Characterization of virulence factor regulation by SrrAB, a two-component system in Staphylococcus aureus. Infect. Immun. 186:2430-2438. |
| 26. | Quelle, L. S., A. Corso, M. Galas, and D. O. Sordelli. 2003. STAR gene restriction profile analysis in epidemiological typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: description of the new method and comparison with other polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 47:455-464.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 27. | Robinson, D. A., A. B. Monk, J. E. Cooper, E. J. Feil, and M. C. Enright. 2005. Evolutionary genetics of the accessory gene regulator (agr) locus in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 187:8312-8321. |
| 28. | Ruegg, P. L. 2003. Investigation of mastitis problems on farms. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Food Anim. Pract. 19:47-73.[CrossRef] |
| 29. | Sandholm, M., L. Kaartinen, and S. Pyorala. 1990. Bovine mastitiswhy does antibiotic therapy not always work? An overview. Vet. Pharmacol. Ther. 13:248-260. |
| 30. | Smith, E. M., L. E. Green, G. F. Medley, H. E. Bird, L. K. Fox, Y. H. Schukken, J. V. Kruze, A. J. Bradley, R. N. Zadoks, and C. G. Dowson. 2005. Multilocus sequence typing of intercontinental bovine Staphylococcus aureus isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:4737-4743. |
| 31. | Sordelli, D. O., F. R. Buzzola, M. I. Gómez, L. Steele-Moore, D. Berg, E. Gentilini, M. Catalano, A. J. Reitz, T. Tollersrud, G. Denamiel, P. Jeric, and J. C. Lee. 2000. Capsule expression by bovine isolates of Staphylococcus aureus from Argentina: genetic and epidemiologic analyses. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:846-850. |
| 32. | Takeuchi, S., T. Maeda, N. Hashimoto, K. Imaizumi, T. Kaidoh, and Y. Hayakawa. 2001. Variation of the agr locus in Staphylococcus aureus isolates from cows with mastitis. Vet. Microbiol. 79:267-274.[CrossRef][Medline] |
| 33. | Tollersrud, T., K. Kenny, A. J. Reitz, and J. C. Lee. 2000. Genetic and serologic evaluation of capsule production by bovine mammary isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and other Staphylococcus spp. from Europe and the United States. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:2998-3003. |
| 34. | Tuchscherr, L. P. N., F. R. Buzzola, L. P. Alvarez, R. L. Caccuri, J. C. Lee, and D. O. Sordelli. 2005. Capsule-negative Staphylococcus aureus induces chronic experimental mastitis in mice. Infect. Immun. 73:7932-7937. |
| 35. | Tuchscherr, L., M. I. Gómez, D. Centrón, J. C. Lee, and D. O. Sordelli. 2002. Presence of an IS431-like element is associated with loss of the capsule locus in nontypeable Staphylococcus aureus isolates, abstr. B-186, p. 64. Abstr. 102nd Gen. Meet. Am. Soc. Microbiol. 2002. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC. |
| 36. | van Belkum, A., J. Kluytmans, W. van Leeuwen, R. Bax, W. Quint, E. Peters, A. Fluit, C. Vandenbroucke-Grauls, A. van den Brule, H. Koeleman, W. Melchers, J. Meis, A. Elaichouni, M. Vaneechoutte, F. Moonens, N. Maes, M. Struelens, F. Tenover, and H. Verbrugh. 1995. Multicenter evaluation of arbitrarily primed PCR for typing of Staphylococcus aureus strains. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:1537-1547.[Abstract] |
| 37. | van Leeuwen, W. B., W. van Nieuwenhuizen, C. Gijzen, H. Verbrugh, and A. van Belkum. 2000. Population studies of methicillin-resistant and -sensitive Staphylococcus aureus strains reveal a lack of variability in the agrD gene, encoding a staphylococcal autoinducer peptide. J. Bacteriol. 182:5721-5729. |
| 38. | van Leeuwen, W. B., D. C. Melles, A. Alaidan, M. Al-Ahdal, H. A. M. Boelens, S. V. Snijders, H. Wertheim, E. van Duijkeren, J. K. Peeters, P. J. van der Spek, R. Gorkink, G. Simons, H. A. Verbrugh, and A. van Belkum. 2005. Host- and tissue-specific pathogenic traits of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 187:4584-4591. |
| 39. | Wesson, C. A., L. E. Liou, K. M. Todd, G. A. Bohach, W. R. Trumble, and K. W. Bayles. 1998. Staphylococcus aureus agr and sar global regulators influence internalization and induction of apoptosis. Infect. Immun. 66:5238-5243. |
| 40. | Wright, J. S., III, K. E. Traber, R. Corrigan, S. A. Benson, J. M. Musser, and R. P. Novick. 2005. The agr radiation: an early event in the evolution of staphylococci. J. Bacteriol. 187:5585-5594. |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| J. Bacteriol. | J. Virol. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|
| Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. | Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | All ASM Journals |
|---|