Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current Issue
• Archive
• Alerts
• About ASM
• Contact us
• Tech Support
• Journals.ASM.org

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gonçalves, C. Articles by Dubreuil, J. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gonçalves, C. Articles by Dubreuil, J. D. Pubmed/NCBI databases Gene Substance via MeSH

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Infection and Immunity, May 2007, p. 2208-2213, Vol. 75, No. 5
0019-9567/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/IAI.01829-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

The Escherichia coli Enterotoxin STb Permeabilizes Piglet Jejunal Brush Border Membrane Vesicles

Carina Gonçalves,¹ Vincent Vachon,² Jean-Louis Schwartz,² and J. Daniel Dubreuil^1*

Groupe de Recherche sur les Maladies Infectieuses du Porc, Département de Pathologie et Microbiologie, Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec J2S 7C6,¹ Groupe d'Étude des Protéines Membranaires, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec H3C 3J7, Canada²

Received 17 November 2006/ Returned for modification 2 January 2007/ Accepted 12 February 2007

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS AND DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
The membrane-permeabilizing ability of the Escherichia coli enterotoxin STb was evaluated using brush border membrane vesicles isolated from piglet jejunum and a membrane-potential-sensitive fluorescent probe, 3,3'-dipropylthiadicarbocyanine iodide. A strong membrane potential was generated by the efflux of K⁺ ions from the vesicles in the presence of the potassium ionophore valinomycin. Under these conditions, preincubation of the vesicles with STb efficiently depolarized the membrane in a dose-dependent and saturable manner. This activity was independent of pH, however, at least between pH 5.5 and 8.0. On the other hand, in the absence of valinomycin, STb had no significant influence on the measured fluorescence levels, indicating that it was unable to modify the ionic selectivity of the intact membrane. In agreement with the fact that the integrity of the disulfide bridges of STb is known to be essential for its biological activity, a reduced and alkylated form of the toxin was unable to depolarize the membrane in the presence of valinomycin. Furthermore, two previously described poorly active STb mutants, M42S and K22A-K23A, showed no membrane-permeabilizing capacity. These results demonstrate for the first time that STb can permeabilize its target membrane and suggest that it does so by forming nonspecific pores.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS AND DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli strains cause severe diarrhea in humans and animals. In large-scale farms, this disease brings about significant losses in pig herds, mainly in newborn and recently weaned animals (29). Diarrhea depends on the production of a variety of toxins belonging to two different groups, the heat-labile toxins (LTI and LTII) and the heat-stable toxins (STa and STb). The heat-stable enterotoxins share no homology and appear to differ in their mechanisms of action (11, 12). STb is synthesized as a 71-amino-acid precursor that undergoes cleavage of its signal sequence of 23 residues (24). A nuclear magnetic resonance study revealed that STb is composed of two antiparallel -helices connected by a glycine-rich loop (39). Its tertiary structure is stabilized by two disulfide bridges (Cys10-Cys48 and Cys21-Cys36) (9), and both bridges are necessary for secretion and toxicity (2, 9, 30).

Until now, the interaction of STb with the intestinal epithelium has not been studied in detail. An acidic glycosphingolipid, sulfatide [Gal(3-SO₄)ß1Cer], has nevertheless been identified as a functional receptor for STb at the level of the luminal surface of pig jejunal epithelial cells (34). The fact that this toxin is composed of an amphipathic (Cys10-Lys22) and a hydrophobic (Gly38-Ala44) -helix suggests that it could possibly insert into the cell membrane and form a pore. This possibility is further suggested by our recent demonstration that STb undergoes oligomerization in vitro (26), a process that constitutes a well-documented characteristic of many pore-forming bacterial toxins (1) and antimicrobial peptides (44).

In the present study, the ability of STb to permeabilize brush border membrane vesicles isolated from piglet jejunum was demonstrated by using a fluorescent membrane potential-sensitive probe, 3,3'-dipropylthiadicarbocyanine iodide [diS-C₃(5)], and a procedure that was recently developed to study the properties of bacterial pore-forming toxins in membrane vesicles (23).

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS AND DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Purification of STb. Unless specified otherwise, all chemicals were from the Sigma Chemical Co. (Oakville, Ontario, Canada). The method used to prepare wild-type and mutated (M42S and K22A-K23A) (25) STb toxins was modified from a previously described protocol (7). An E. coli HB101 strain harboring the plasmid pMal-STb, which is responsible for the expression of a maltose-binding protein-mature STb fusion protein, with or without the selected mutation, was grown in Luria broth containing 50 µg of ampicillin/ml until the optical density at 600 nm (OD₆₀₀) reached 0.5. Then, 0.3 mM IPTG (isopropyl-ß-D-thiogalactopyranoside) was added to induce the synthesis of the fusion protein. Three hours after induction, cells were harvested by centrifugation at 4,000 x g for 10 min at 4°C. The pellet was gently resuspended in 500 ml of 30 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) containing 20% (wt/vol) sucrose and 1 mM EDTA. After centrifugation at 8,000 x g for 10 min at 4°C, the cells were resuspended in 500 ml of 5 mM MgSO₄ and incubated at 4°C for 10 min. After centrifugation at 8,000 x g for 10 min at 4°C, the fusion protein was affinity purified from the supernatant representing the osmotic shock fluid by using an amylose resin (New England Biolabs, Pickering, Ontario, Canada). The amylose-purified fusion protein was dialyzed against Xa buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM CaCl₂) and then cleaved with protease factor Xa (GE Healthcare, Baie d'Urfé, Quebec, Canada). The cleaved material was loaded onto a C₈ reversed-phase microbore column (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) using an Ákta Purifier10 system (GE Healthcare) and eluted with a linear gradient of acetonitrile (5 to 100%) in a water solution containing 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid. Wild-type and mutant STb preparations were quantified at 214 nm using aprotinin as the reference. The purified STb toxin was lyophilized and kept at –20°C until use. The identity and purity of the toxin was verified by N-terminal sequence analysis using Edman degradation (Model 494 CLC Procise Sequencer; Applied Biosystems) as described earlier (28).

Preparation of reduced and alkylated STb. Purified STb toxin was modified by reduction and alkylation with the method described by William et al. (42). Briefly, STb was reduced with 45 mM dithiothreitol in 100 mM NH₄HCO₃ at 60°C for 30 min and alkylated with 100 mM iodoacetamide in 100 mM NH₄HCO₃ for 30 min at room temperature in the dark. The reduced and alkylated STb toxin was dialyzed (membrane cutoff of 3.5 kDa) against 50 mM NH₄HCO₃ (pH 8.5) for 2 h and against water for another 2 h.

Preparation of brush border membrane vesicles. Four-week-old weaned piglets from a conventional herd were obtained from a local producer. The animals were killed the day they arrived at the university. In the meantime, the piglets were cared for in accordance with the Guidelines of the Canadian Council for Animal Care. They were sedated by intramuscular injection of a mixture of 10 mg of ketamine hydrochloride (Biomeda-MTC, Cambridge, Ontario, Canada) per kg of body weight and 20 mg of xylazine (Bayer, Toronto, Ontario, Canada) per kg of body weight. Euthanasia was carried out by an intracardiac injection of 540 mg of sodium pentobarbital (Pharmacy, Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Saint-Hyacinthe)/ml, and 30 cm of jejunum was recovered, rinsed thoroughly with ice-cold physiological buffer, and stored at –80°C until use.

Brush border membrane vesicles were prepared with a modification of the MgCl₂-precipitation method (18). All manipulations were carried out on ice or in a centrifuge refrigerated at 4°C. Frozen jejunum segments were thawed and scraped by using a spatula, weighed, and homogenized in 50 mM mannitol-5 mM EGTA-2 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.0) (20 ml for each g of tissue). The mixture was stirred for 10 min after the addition of MgCl₂ to a final concentration of 10 mM and centrifuged at 7,700 x g for 15 min. The supernatant was centrifuged for 30 min at 20,000 x g. The pellet was resuspended in 250 mM KCl-125 mM mannitol-0.1 mM MgSO₄-50 mM Tris-HEPES (pH 7.5). The preparation was then centrifuged for 15 min at 1,900 x g, and the resulting supernatant was centrifuged for 15 min at 30,900 x g. The final membrane preparation was resuspended in 250 mM KCl-0.1 mM MgSO₄-50 mM MES (morpholineethanesulfonic acid)-Tris (pH 5.8) and stored at –80°C until use. In preparation for the experiments, the vesicles were diluted to 2.0 mg of protein/ml with this same solution.

Protein concentrations were estimated by using a BCA protein assay kit (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL) and bovine serum albumin as the standard. Leucine aminopeptidase activity, assayed with L-leucine p-nitroanilide as the substrate (16), was enriched 10-fold (±1; average of seven independent preparations) relative to the epithelium homogenate.

Fluorescence measurements. The membrane-permeabilizing effects of STb were monitored with a membrane potential-sensitive fluorescent probe, diS-C3(5) (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) (23). Experiments were carried out at room temperature in polystyrene cuvettes containing 1.5 µM diS-C₃(5), from a 1 mM stock solution in dimethyl sulfoxide, in 2 ml of the appropriate buffer solution, using a Spex Fluorolog CM-3 spectrofluorometer (Jobin Yvon Horiba, Edison, NJ) at a frequency of 10 Hz, an excitation wavelength of 620 nm, and an emission wavelength of 670 nm. Before each experiment, the mixture was stirred for 10 min in the dark to allow fluorescence to reach a steady level (22, 36). Vesicles were preincubated for 15 min in the presence or absence of STb at room temperature. A few seconds after the beginning of the recording, vesicles were injected into the cuvette at a final concentration of 5 µg of protein/ml. In some experiments, 7.5 µM valinomycin was added to the cuvette from a 5 mM stock solution in ethanol. Fluorescence values were normalized relative to the level measured before addition of the vesicles. For each experimental condition tested, the fluorescence level was measured in the absence of a membrane potential by injecting vesicles into the same solution as that with which they were loaded.

Statistical analyses. Unless specified otherwise, values presented in the text and figures are means ± the standard error of the mean (SEM). Statistical analyses were carried out by using the linear model of the SAS package (version 9.0; SAS Institute, Cary, NC). We also performed a priori contrasts to examine differences between levels of the different factors.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS AND DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Generation and reduction of a membrane potential in piglet jejunal brush border membrane vesicles. The membrane-permeabilizing ability of STb was analyzed with a fluorescence assay (23) using diS-C₃(5), a membrane-potential-sensitive probe (40). In this assay, vesicles loaded with 250 mM KCl and preincubated with or without STb were first injected in the presence of the fluorescent probe and the potassium ionophore valinomycin into cuvettes containing the same solution as that with which they were loaded (Fig. 1). This procedure allowed the measurement of the fluorescence level in the absence of ionic gradients and therefore in the absence of a membrane potential. The slight decrease in fluorescence was due to the association of some of the fluorescent probe with the membrane vesicles. Under these conditions, STb had no influence on the fluorescence level attained after the injection, an indication that the toxin does not interact directly with the probe. When vesicles were injected into cuvettes in which the KCl solution was replaced by an isotonic solution of N-methyl-D-glucamine hydrochloride, fluorescence decreased to a much greater extent, a finding indicative of the presence of an inside-negative membrane potential generated by the preferential efflux of potassium ions induced by valinomycin. The resulting concentration and aggregation of the positively charged probe within the vesicles and their membranes caused a strong quenching of the fluorescence (33, 36, 41). The fact that a strong membrane potential can be generated under these conditions in the presence of valinomycin demonstrates that the vesicles used in the present study were tightly sealed. In the presence of STb, less quenching of the fluorescence signal, indicative of a lower membrane potential, demonstrated an increased permeability of the membrane to at least one of the other ions present, N-methyl-D-glucamine and chloride.

View larger version (16K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 1. Effect of the potassium transmembrane gradient, valinomycin, and STb on the membrane potential generated in brush border membrane vesicles isolated from piglet jejunum epithelial cells. Vesicles loaded with 250 mM KCl-0.1 mM MgSO4-50 mM MES-Tris (pH 5.8) were incubated for 15 min with or without 12.5 nmol of STb/mg of membrane protein. Fluorescence was monitored in a Spex Fluorolog spectrofluorometer as described in Materials and Methods. Five seconds after the beginning of the recording, vesicles were injected into cuvettes containing 1.5 µM diS-C3(5), 7.5 µM valinomycin, and either the same solution as that with which they were loaded (KCl) or a solution of similar composition in which KCl was replaced by N-methyl-D-glucamine hydrochloride (NMDGCl). Each curve corresponds to a representative experimental record.

Calibration of the fluorescence signal. Relative fluorescence measured in the presence of valinomycin varied as a sigmoid-like function of the logarithm of the intravesicular and extravesicular potassium concentration ratio (Fig. 2). This result deviates from the linear relationship predicted by the Nernst equation, although a straight line can be fitted reasonably well to the data for ratios of 1 to approximately 10. At higher concentration ratios, however, the slope of the curve increases sharply before starting to level off gradually as predicted by the Goldman-Hodgkin-Katz equation which, in contrast with the Nernst equation, takes into account the permeability of the membrane to each of the ionic species present (19). The fact that the calibration curve is not linear indicates a complex relationship between fluorescence, membrane permeability, and membrane potential. Nonlinear relationships have nevertheless been reported for experiments performed with diS-C₃(5) and other cyanine dyes with lepidopteran insect larval midgut brush border membrane vesicles (23, 31) and various cell types (8, 13, 22). Interestingly, linear relationships were reported for experiments performed with rabbit renal brush border membrane vesicles but, in these studies, the potassium concentration ratio was only varied from 1 to 10 (6, 43).

View larger version (9K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 2. Calibration of the fluorescence signal as a function of the transmembrane potassium concentration ratio. Fluorescence was monitored by using a protocol similar to that illustrated in Fig. 1. Vesicles loaded with 250 mM KCl-0.1 mM MgSO4-50 mM MES-Tris (pH 5.8) were injected into cuvettes containing the appropriate concentration of KCl, enough N-methyl-D-glucamine hydrochloride to maintain osmolarity and ionic strength constant, 0.1 mM MgSO4, 50 mM MES-Tris (pH 5.8), 1.5 µM diS-C3(5), and 7.5 µM valinomycin. Values are means ± the SEM for nine experiments, each performed with a different membrane preparation.

Membrane-permeabilizing ability of STb. The membrane potential generated by the diffusion of potassium ion was analyzed in the presence of a variety of salt solutions (Fig. 3). In the absence of valinomycin (Fig. 3A), similar fluorescence levels were measured irrespective of the salt solution used. This observation indicates the absence of a strong preferential permeability of the vesicles for any of the ions tested. In contrast, when a preferential permeability for potassium ions was introduced by the addition of valinomycin, a strong membrane potential was generated in the presence of every salt solution except KCl and potassium gluconate (Fig. 3B). The latter two solutions served as negative controls designed to allow fluorescence levels to be measured in the absence of a potassium gradient. Taken together, these results suggest that the vesicles were largely impermeable to the ions tested, as should be expected from the fact that the intestinal brush border membrane plays a critical role in the absorption of various nutrients, a process which is mediated by a variety of sodium gradient-dependent cotransporters (38).

View larger version (20K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 3. Effect of STb on the membrane potential generated in the presence of various electrolyte solutions. Vesicles loaded with 250 mM KCl-0.1 mM MgSO4-50 mM MES-Tris (pH 5.8) were incubated for 15 min in the presence () or absence () of 12.5 nmol of STb/mg of membrane protein. Fluorescence was monitored by using a protocol similar to that illustrated in Fig. 1. The vesicles were injected in cuvettes containing 1.5 µM diS-C3(5) and either the same solution as that with they were loaded (KCl) or a solution of similar composition in which 250 mM KCl was replaced by the same concentration of either NaCl, N-methyl-D-glucamine hydrochloride (NMDGCl), LiCl, potassium gluconate (KGlu), tetramethylammonium chloride (TMACl), or tetraethylammonium chloride (TEACl), in the absence (A) or presence (B) of 7.5 µM valinomycin. Values are means ± the SEM for five experiments, each performed with a different membrane preparation. Means labeled with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05).

Preincubating the vesicles with STb had little effect on the fluorescence signal measured in the absence of valinomycin (Fig. 3A). However, this signal was quenched to a significantly lesser extent when measured in the presence of both valinomycin and a potassium ion gradient (Fig. 3B). Taken together, these results indicate that STb permeabilizes efficiently the membrane for other ions than potassium and thus reduces the potential generated by the efflux of this ion. This depolarizing effect of STb was observed for a variety of chloride salts of monovalent cations, including sodium, N-methyl-D-glucamine, lithium, tetramethylammonium, and tetraethylammonium, suggesting that, in the presence of the toxin, the membrane discriminates poorly between different cations. The fact that STb has little effect on the membrane potential generated in the absence of valinomycin also suggests that its effects on the membrane are poorly selective. The possibility remains, however, that the lack of apparent selectivity for cations could result from a strong selectivity for chloride ions. This appears nevertheless unlikely since, according to this hypothesis, an inside-positive membrane potential would have been generated when KCl-loaded vesicles were diluted in a solution of potassium gluconate, in the absence of valinomycin. This situation, which could have been detected as an increased fluorescence level (6, 43) over that measured in the absence of STb, was not observed in the experiments illustrated in Fig. 3A. These results therefore appear to be best explained by the fact that STb permeabilizes the membrane in a nonselective manner, possibly by the formation of poorly selective pores. This conclusion is consistent with our recent observation that STb increases the uptake of trypan blue by susceptible cells (4).

Evidence for pore formation by STb. To test the possibility that STb forms pores, its permeabilizing effect was measured in vesicles preincubated with various concentrations of the toxin and diluted in a solution of N-methyl-D-glucamine hydrochloride in the presence of valinomycin (Fig. 4). Fluorescence levels increased rapidly at the lower STb concentrations but soon leveled off as the toxin concentration was further increased. The data presented in Fig. 4 were well fitted with the Michaelis-Menten equation, with relative fluorescence levels reaching a plateau at 0.81 ± 0.01 and an apparent half-saturation constant of 1.8 ± 0.4 nmol STb/mg membrane protein (corresponding to 1.1 ± 0.2 µM). This value matches reasonably well the earlier published estimates of 2 to 6 µM for the dissociation constant of STb binding to its receptor, sulfatide, obtained with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (3).

View larger version (9K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 4. Effect of STb concentration on membrane potential. Experiments were carried out by injecting KCl-loaded vesicles, previously incubated with the indicated concentrations of STb, in an isotonic solution of N-methyl-D-glucamine hydrochloride as described in the legend of Fig. 1. The fluorescence level measured in the absence of a membrane potential was 0.963 ± 0.008. Values are means ± the SEM for four experiments, each performed with a different membrane preparation. The datum points were fitted with the Michaelis-Menten equation using the software Origin (version 7.5; OriginLab Corp., Northampton, MA).

The fact that a maximum level of fluorescence was reached as the concentration of STb was increased indicates that its permeabilizing effect is probably not attributable to a membrane-destabilizing detergent-like effect but depends on its interaction with its receptor. These considerations suggest that the permeabilizing activity of STb could result from the formation of a pore-like structure within the membrane (5). This conclusion is supported by the results of a preliminary study suggesting that STb can form ion channels in planar lipid bilayers (V. Labrie, L. Potvin, J. Harel, J. D. Dubreuil, and J.-L. Schwartz, unpublished data). The receptor appears to act by facilitating the insertion of STb and the formation of pores within the membrane, thus increasing its permeability. However, because the experiments performed here measure the permeability resulting from the accumulation of new pores during the 15-min incubation period rather than the rate of pore formation, the observation of a plateau in the fluorescence levels suggests that sulfatide does not simply catalyze the insertion of toxin molecules in the membrane but remains associated in some way with STb molecules rather than becoming available for binding new toxin molecules once the insertion has been completed.

Lack of effect of pH on the membrane-permeabilizing ability of STb. Because somewhat contrasting results have been published regarding the effect of pH on the binding of STb to the piglet jejunal luminal membrane (35) and to its receptor (3), vesicles incubated in the presence or absence of toxin were injected in solutions of KCl or N-methyl-D-glucamine hydrochloride at various pH values ranging from 5.5 to 8.0 in the presence of valinomycin (Fig. 5). This range comprises the pH values reported for the jejunal contents of piglets, 2 weeks after weaning (pH 5.5 to 7.0) (37). Fluorescence levels were not affected significantly by pH in the absence of a membrane potential. However, in the N-methyl-D-glucamine hydrochloride solution, both in the presence and in the absence of STb, fluorescence levels decreased gradually as pH was increased. This result is consistent with earlier studies indicating that, although the fluorescence of diS-C₃(5) is independent of pH in solution, it is strongly pH dependent in the presence of cells or cell membranes (13, 21, 23, 41). The pattern illustrated in Fig. 5 can be simply explained by the fact that, as pH is increased, an increasing number of amino groups belonging to membrane proteins lose their charge, thus rendering the membrane more negatively charged and causing an increase in the number of positively charged probe molecules interacting with the vesicles.

View larger version (11K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 5. Membrane-permeabilizing ability of STb at various pH values. Experiments were carried out as described in the legend of Fig. 1 except that the KCl solutions were buffered with a 50 mM concentration of either MES-Tris at between pH 5.5 and 6.5, HEPES-Tris at pH 7.0 and 7.5, or Tris-HCl at pH 8.0. Values are means ± the SEM for four experiments, each performed with a different membrane preparation.

For all pH values tested, fluorescence levels were higher in the presence of STb than in its absence (Fig. 5). However, the difference between the levels measured, at each pH value, in the presence of the toxin and in its absence was not significantly altered. The absence of an apparent effect of pH on membrane permeabilization by STb is consistent with the results of a previous study in which the binding of STb to its sulfatide receptor was observed to be pH independent (3). On the other hand, it is difficult to reconcile our data with the results of another study in which a sharp peak in the ability of STb to bind to piglet jejunal epithelial tissue was observed between pH 5.0 and 7.0 (35). It should be pointed out, however, that the three techniques used for this comparison differ substantially, a situation that may contribute to the observed differences.

Only functional STb displays a membrane-permeabilizing ability. The membrane-depolarizing capacity of STb was compared to those of three inactive forms of the toxin (Fig. 6). STb in which disulfide bonds have been chemically removed by reduction and alkylation has long been shown to be nonactive (9). Similarly, the single mutant M42S and the double mutant K22A-K23A have been shown to bind poorly to sulfatide and to be poorly active in the ligated rat jejunal loop assay (25). In contrast to intact STb, none of the three inactive forms of the toxin was able to increase the fluorescence level above that measured in the absence of toxin, even when they were added at twice the concentration used for STb (Fig. 6). The ability of STb to depolarize the brush border membrane therefore correlates well with its enterotoxicity.

View larger version (10K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 6. Comparison of the permeabilizing ability of STb with that of its reduced and alkylated derivative (STb/AR) and of two of its mutants (M42S and K22A-K23A). Experiments were carried out by injecting KCl-loaded vesicles, previously incubated with either 12.5 nmol of STb/mg of membrane protein or 25 nmol of either one of the other toxins/mg of membrane protein, in an isotonic solution of N-methyl-D-glucamine hydrochloride (NMDGCl) as described in the legend of Fig. 1. The fluorescence level measured in the absence of a membrane potential was 0.948 ± 0.008. Values are means ± the SEM for three experiments each performed with a different membrane preparation. The asterisk indicates a significant difference with the corresponding value measured in the absence of toxin (P < 0.05).

Role of membrane permeabilization in the toxicity of STb. The results of the present study clearly demonstrate the ability of STb to increase the permeability of its target membrane. On the other hand, STb has recently been shown to be internalized within rat intestinal epithelial cells (27). The demonstration of this increase in membrane permeability may therefore have been facilitated by the fact that the endocytotic machinery of the cell is absent from the isolated membrane vesicles used in the present study. This finding raises the question, however, of the role of membrane permeabilization in diarrhea and of its relation with a number of cellular events that have been identified as resulting directly from the interaction of STb with the cell membrane. For instance, STb has been reported to open GTP-binding protein-dependent calcium channels in the plasma membrane (10). The resulting increase in the cytosolic calcium level may regulate phospholipases A₂ and C, which catalyze the release of arachidonic acid from membrane phospholipids, and finally the formation of a secretory agent, prostaglandin E₂ (14, 17, 20, 32). Elevated intracellular calcium levels also appear to be involved in the activation of a calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (15). Among other things, it remains to be understood how the signal constituted by the binding of STb to its sulfatide receptor, a membrane lipid, can be transmitted to the intracellular metabolic machinery. The formation of pores within the plasma membrane, or the membrane disturbance caused by their presence, may possibly constitute a signaling event contributing to trigger the induction of the mechanisms of fluid secretion associated with diarrhea.

 
We gratefully acknowledge the contribution of the following coworkers from the Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire, Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec, Canada: John M. Fairbrother and Francis Girard for providing piglet jejunal tissue and Guy Beauchamp for help with the statistical analyses.

This study was supported by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council research grant 139070-01 to J.D.D., by a Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec research group grant to J.-L.S., and by the Groupe d'Étude des Protéines Membranaires (grant 5252).

 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Groupe de Recherche sur les Maladies Infectieuses du Porc, Département de Pathologie et Microbiologie, Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, 3200 Sicotte Street, Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec J2S 7C6, Canada. Phone: (450) 773-8521, ext. 18433. Fax: (450) 778-8108. E-mail: daniel.dubreuil{at}umontreal.ca

Published ahead of print on 16 February 2007.

Editor: J. F. Urban, Jr.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS AND DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 

1
1. Alouf, J. E. 2001. Pore-forming bacterial protein toxins: an overview. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 257:1-14.[Medline]
2
2. Arriaga, Y. L., B. A. Harville, and L. A. Dreyfus. 1995. Contribution of individual disulfide bonds to biological action of Escherichia coli heat-stable enterotoxin B. Infect. Immun. 63:4715-4720.[Abstract]
3
3. Beausoleil, H.-E., and J. D. Dubreuil. 2001. In vitro binding characteristics and affinity for sulfatide of Escherichia coli STb enterotoxin. Receptors Channels 7:401-411.[Medline]
4
4. Beausoleil, H.-E., V. Labrie, and J. D. Dubreuil. 2002. Trypan blue uptake by Chinese hamster ovary cultured cells: a cellular model to study Escherichia coli STb enterotoxin. Toxicon 40:185-191.[Medline]
5
5. Bechinger, B. 1997. Structure and functions of channel-forming peptides: magainins, cecropins, melittin, and alamethicin. J. Membr. Biol. 156:197-211.[CrossRef][Medline]
6
6. Beck, J. C., and B. Sacktor. 1978. Membrane potential-sensitive fluorescence changes during Na⁺-dependent D-glucose transport in renal brush border membrane vesicles. J. Biol. Chem. 253:7158-7162.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7
7. Bossé, M., C. E. Handl, L.-A. Lortie, J. Harel, and J. D. Dubreuil. 1993. Fusion of the genes encoding Escherichia coli heat-stable enterotoxin b (STb) and the maltose-binding protein to obtain mature STb enterotoxin. J. Gen. Microbiol. 139:631-638.[Medline]
8
8. Burckhardt, G. 1977. Non-linear relationship between fluorescence and membrane potential. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 468:227-237.[Medline]
9
9. Dreyfus, L. A., R. G. Urban, S. C. Whipp, C. Slaughter, K. Tachias, and Y. M. Kupersztoch. 1992. Purification of the ST_B enterotoxin of Escherichia coli and the role of selected amino acids on its secretion, stability and toxicity. Mol. Microbiol. 6:2397-2406.[CrossRef][Medline]
10
10. Dreyfus, L. A., B. Harville, D. E. Howard, R. Shaban, D. M. Beatty, and S. J. Morris. 1993. Calcium influx mediated by the Escherichia coli heat-stable enterotoxin B (ST_B). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:3202-3206.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11
11. Dubreuil, J. D. 1997. Escherichia coli STb enterotoxin. Microbiology 143:1783-1795.[Free Full Text]
12
12. Dubreuil, J. D. 2006. Escherichia coli heat-stable enterotoxin b, p. 491-503. In J. E. Alouf and M. R. Popoff (ed.), The comprehensive sourcebook of bacterial protein toxins, 3rd ed. Academic Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
13
13. Freedman, J. C., and J. F. Hoffman. 1979. The relation between dicarbocyanine dye fluorescence and the membrane potential of human red blood cells set at varying Donnan equilibria. J. Gen. Physiol. 74:187-212.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14
14. Fujii, Y., Y. Kondo, and K. Okamoto. 1995. Involvement of prostaglandin E₂ synthesis in the intestinal secretory action of Escherichia coli heat-stable enterotoxin II. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 130:259-265.[CrossRef][Medline]
15
15. Fujii, Y., T. Nomura, H. Yamanaka, and K. Okamoto. 1997. Involvement of Ca²⁺-calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II in the intestinal secretory action of Escherichia coli heat-stable enterotoxin II. Microbiol. Immunol. 41:633-636.[Medline]
16
16. Hafkenscheid, J. C. M. 1984. Aminopeptidases and amino acid arylamidases, p. 2-34. In J. Bergemayer (ed.), Methods of enzymatic analysis, vol. V. Enzymes 3: peptidases, proteinases, and their inhibitors. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, Germany.
17
17. Harville, B. A., and L. A. Dreyfus. 1995. Involvement of 5-hydroxytryptamine and prostaglandin E₂ in the intestinal secretory action of Escherichia coli heat-stable enterotoxin B. Infect. Immun. 63:745-750.[Abstract]
18
18. Hauser, H., K. Howell, R. M. C. Dawson, and D. E. Bowyer. 1980. Rabbit small intestinal brush border membrane preparation and lipid composition. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 602:567-577.[Medline]
19
19. Hille, B. 1992. Ionic channels of excitable membranes, 2nd ed., p. 1-20. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
20
20. Hitotsubashi, S., Y. Fujii, H. Yamanaka, and K. Okamoto. 1992. Some properties of purified Escherichia coli heat-stable enterotoxin II. Infect. Immun. 60:4468-4474.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21
21. Hladky, S. B., and T. J. Rink. 1976. Potential difference and the distribution of ions across the human red blood cell membrane: a study of the mechanism by which the fluorescent cation, diS-C₃(5) reports membrane potential. J. Physiol. 263:287-319.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22
22. Hoffman, J. F., and P. C. Laris. 1974. Determination of membrane potentials in human and Amphiuma red blood cells by means of a fluorescent probe. J. Physiol. 239:519-552.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23
23. Kirouac, M., V. Vachon, S. Rivest, J.-L. Schwartz, and R. Laprade. 2003. Analysis of the properties of Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal toxins using a potential-sensitive probe. J. Membr. Biol. 196:51-59.[CrossRef][Medline]
24
24. Kupersztoch, Y. M., K. Tachias, C. R. Moomaw, L. A. Dreyfus, R. Urban, C. Slaughter, and S. Whipp. 1990. Secretion of methanol-insoluble heat-stable enterotoxin (ST_B): energy- and secA-dependent conversion of pre-ST_B to an intermediate indistinguishable from the extracellular toxin. J. Bacteriol. 172:2427-2432.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25
25. Labrie, V., H.-E. Beausoleil, J. Harel, and J. D. Dubreuil. 2001. Binding to sulfatide and enterotoxicity of various Escherichia coli STb mutants. Microbiology 147:3141-3148.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26
26. Labrie, V., J. Harel, and J. D. Dubreuil. 2001. Oligomerization of Escherichia coli enterotoxin b through its C-terminal hydrophobic -helix. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1535:128-133.[Medline]
27
27. Labrie, V., J. Harel, and J. D. Dubreuil. 2002. Escherichia coli heat-stable enterotoxin b (STb) in vivo internalization within rat intestinal epithelial cells. Vet. Res. 33:223-228.[CrossRef][Medline]
28
28. Ménard, L.-P., J. G. Lussier, F. Lépine, C. Paiva de Sousa, and J. D. Dubreuil. 2004. Expression, purification, and biochemical characterization of enteroaggregative Escherichia coli heat-stable enterotoxin 1. Protein Expr. Purif. 33:223-231.[CrossRef][Medline]
29
29. Nagy, B., and P. Z. Fekete. 1999. Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) in farm animals. Vet. Res. 30:259-284.[Medline]
30
30. Okamoto, K., T. Baba, H. Yamanaka, N. Akashi, and Y. Fujii. 1995. Disulfide bond formation and secretion of Escherichia coli heat-stable enterotoxin II. J. Bacteriol. 177:4579-4586.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31
31. Parthasarathy, R., and W. R. Harvey. 1994. Potential differences influence amino acid/Na⁺ symport rates in larval Manduca sexta midgut brush-border membrane vesicles. J. Exp. Biol. 189:55-67.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32
32. Peterson, J. W., and S. C. Whipp. 1995. Comparison of the mechanisms of action of cholera toxin and the heat-stable enterotoxins of Escherichia coli. Infect. Immun. 63:1452-1461.[Abstract]
33
33. Pláek, J., and K. Sigler. 1996. Slow fluorescent indicators of membrane potential: a survey of different approaches to probe response analysis. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 33:101-124.[CrossRef][Medline]
34
34. Rousset, E., J. Harel, and J. D. Dubreuil. 1998. Sulfatide from the pig jejunum brush border epithelial cell surface is involved in binding of Escherichia coli enterotoxin b. Infect. Immun. 66:5650-5658.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35
35. Rousset, E., J. Harel, and J. D. Dubreuil. 1998. Binding characteristics of Escherichia coli enterotoxin b (STb) to pig jejunum and partial characterization of the molecule involved. Microb. Pathog. 24:277-288.[CrossRef][Medline]
36
36. Sims, P. J., A. S. Waggoner, C.-H. Wang, and J. F. Hoffman. 1974. Studies on the mechanism by which cyanine dyes measure membrane potential in red blood cells and phosphatidylcholine vesicles. Biochemistry 13:3315-3330.[CrossRef][Medline]
37
37. Snoeck, V., E. Cox, F. Verdonck, J. J. Joensuu, and B. M. Goddeeris. 2004. Influence of porcine intestinal pH and gastric digestion on antigenicity of F4 fimbriae for oral immunization. Vet. Microbiol. 98:45-53.[CrossRef][Medline]
38
38. Stevens, B. R., J. D. Kaunitz, and E. M. Wright. 1984. Intestinal transport of amino acids and sugars: advances using membrane vesicles. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 46:417-433.[CrossRef][Medline]
39
39. Sukumar, M., J. Rizo, M. Wall, L. A. Dreyfus, Y. M. Kupersztoch, and L. M. Gierasch. 1995. The structure of Escherichia coli heat-stable enterotoxin b by nuclear magnetic resonance and circular dichroism. Protein Sci. 4:1718-1729.[Medline]
40
40. Tsien, R. Y., and S. B. Hladky. 1978. A quantitative resolution of the spectra of a membrane potential indicator, diS-C₃-(5), bound to cell components and to red blood cells. J. Membr. Biol. 38:73-97.[CrossRef][Medline]
41
41. Waggoner, A. S. 1979. Dye indicators of membrane potential. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng. 8:47-68.[CrossRef][Medline]
42
42. William, K., M. LoPresti, and K. Stone. 1997. Internal protein sequencing of SDS-PAGE-separated proteins: optimization of an in gel digest protocol, p. 79-90. In D. Marshak (ed.), Techniques VIII. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA.
43
43. Wright, S. H., S. Krasne, I. Kippen, and E. M. Wright. 1981. Na⁺-dependent transport of tricarboxylic acid cycle intermediates by renal brush border membranes. Effects on fluorescence of a potential-sensitive cyanine dye. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 640:767-778.[Medline]
44
44. Zasloff, M. 2002. Antimicrobial peptides of multicellular organisms. Nature 415:389-395.[CrossRef][Medline]

---

Infection and Immunity, May 2007, p. 2208-2213, Vol. 75, No. 5
0019-9567/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/IAI.01829-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gonçalves, C. Articles by Dubreuil, J. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gonçalves, C. Articles by Dubreuil, J. D. Pubmed/NCBI databases Gene Substance via MeSH