Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, June 2007, p. 2765-2775, Vol. 75, No. 6
0019-9567/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/IAI.00079-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Toledo Health Science Campus, 3055 Arlington Avenue, Toledo, Ohio 43614,1 Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Georgia College of Veterinary Medicine, Athens, Georgia 306022
Received 12 January 2007/ Returned for modification 15 February 2007/ Accepted 9 March 2007
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
In addition to these major adherence factors, several outer membrane (OM) proteins have been shown to contribute to the binding of M. catarrhalis to epithelial cells. McaP (49), which also exhibits phospholipase B activity, mediates attachment to several human cell lines, including A549, NCIH292, and HEp2, while another previously characterized OM protein, OMPCD (23, 35, 36), facilitates binding to A549 cells (21). Preincubation of M. catarrhalis cells with a monoclonal antibody against lipooligosaccharides was reported to significantly reduce adherence to Chang human conjunctival cells, implying a role for lipooligosaccharides in adherence (24).
This array of adherence factors likely allows the organism to efficiently colonize several different areas of the human respiratory tract and thus represent attractive vaccine candidates. Antibodies to these surface molecules would presumably opsonize M. catarrhalis and block its binding to human mucosal surfaces, thereby interfering with colonization and subsequent development of infection. Adhesins have proven to be effective vaccine antigens. For instance, all vaccines currently licensed for use in the United States against Bordetella pertussis, the causative agent of whooping cough, target the filamentous hemagglutinin adhesin (FHA) (3). In this study, we report the identification and characterization of two filamentous hemagglutinin-like adhesins expressed in the OM of M. catarrhalis strain O35E.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Bacterial strains and plasmids
|
Construction of isogenic mutations in the mhaC, mhaB1, and mhaB2 genes. The Kanr cassette from pUC4K (GE HealthCare Life Sciences) was introduced into a unique NsiI site near the middle of the O12E mhaC ORF of pELO12EC, yielding the plasmid pELO12EC-K. This construct was used to electroporate strains O12E, McGHS1, and O35E using a method previously described by Holm et al. (22). These electroporated cells were next plated on medium containing kanamycin, and colonies were screened by PCR with primers P1 and P2 (see above) to identify the mhaC isogenic mutants O12E.C, McGHS1.C, and O35E.C (data not shown). Lack of expression of MhaC in these mutants was verified by Western blotting (see Fig. 2 and Fig. 5).
![]() View larger version (33K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Western blot analysis of selected OM proteins expressed by M. catarrhalis strain O35E and isogenic mha mutants. OM vesicles were obtained from the WT isolate O35E (lane 1) and from its mhaC (lane 2), mhaB1 (lane 3), mhaB2 (lane 4), and mhaB1 mhaB2 (lane 5) mutant strains and analyzed by immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies (Ab). Molecular mass markers are shown to the left in kilodaltons.
|
![]() View larger version (40K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Western blot analysis of selected OM proteins expressed by M. catarrhalis O35E, O12E, and McGHS1 and strains derived from these isolates. OM preparations from the WT, mhaC mutants, and repaired mhaC strains were electrophoresed, transferred to PVDF membranes, and analyzed by immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies (Ab). Molecular mass markers are shown to the left in kilodaltons.
|
1.4-kb PCR fragment from strain O12E with primers P9 (5'-TGA CTG CGG TCC ATC CTA ATG AGT-3') and P10 (5'-GCC GTC AGT TAA TTA AGC GAT TCA TGG TGG ACT GTC CTT G-3'; PacI site underlined). This amplicon corresponded to 1.3 kb at the 5' end of mhaC, the intergenic region between mhaC and mhaB1, and the first 3 codons of mhaB1 at the end of which a PacI site was engineered. This PCR product was cloned into pCC1 using the CopyControl PCR cloning kit (Epicenter) to yield the plasmid pRBO12EB1NT. The plasmid pRBO12EB1, which contains the entire O12E mhaB1 (see above), was restricted with PacI and EcoRI to generate a 1.5-kb fragment that corresponds to the 3' end of mhaB1. This DNA fragment was excised from an agarose gel, purified with the High-Pure PCR product purification kit (Roche) according to the manufacturer's guidelines, and ligated into the plasmid pRBO12EB1NT which had been previously digested with PacI and EcoRI. The resulting plasmid, pRBO12EB1KO, was linearized with PacI and ligated with the spectinomycin resistance cassette from pSPECR (56) to yield pRBO12EB1KO-S. This construct, corresponding to the mhaB1 gene in which 4.4 kb of the 5.2-kb ORF had been replaced with the 1.2-kb spectinomycin-resistant cassette, was introduced into strain O35E by electroporation, and spectinomycin-resistant transformants were screened by PCR with primers P3 (see above) and P11 (5'-TTG GGC GTT GAT AGG AAT GCC TTG-3'). This primer pair yielded a PCR product of
6-kb in the WT strain O35E and a smaller amplicon of 2.8-kb in the isogenic mutant O35E.B1, thereby confirming proper allelic exchange (data not shown). To engineer a mutation in the mhaB2 gene, a 1-kb amplicon corresponding to the DNA located upstream of O12E mhaB2 and including the first 3 codons of the ORF was first amplified using oligonucleotides P12 (5'-ACA GGC AAC CCA AGG ATA CCA TCT-3') and P10 (the end of which contains the first 3 codons of mhaB2 preceded by a PacI site, see above) and cloned into the vector pCC1; the resulting plasmid was designated pRBO12EB2NT. Concurrently, a PCR product of 1 kb specifying the 3' end of O12E mhaB2 was amplified with P13 (5'-TGA ATC GCT TAA TTA ATG TCG CCA GTG AGA TCT TTA CCG A-3'; PacI site underlined) and P14 (5'-TTA TGC ACC CAC ACC CCA TA-3') and cloned in pCC1 to yield pRBO12EB2CT. The latter was restricted with PacI and EcoRI, and a digestion product of 1 kb was purified from agarose slices and ligated with the plasmid pRBO12EB2NT, digested with PacI and EcoRI, to generate the construct pRBO12EB2KO. This plasmid was finally linearized with PacI to introduce the 0.4-kb zeocin-resistant cassette from pEM7/ZEO (Invitrogen), and the resulting construct was named pRBO12EB2KO-Z. This construct, specifying the O12E mhaB2 gene in which 4 kb of the 5,385-nucleotide (nt) ORF has been replaced with the 0.4-kb zeocin cassette, was used to electroporate strain O35E, yielding the zeocin-resistant strain O35E.B2. Allelic exchange was confirmed by PCR (data not shown).
The double-mutant strain O35E.B1B2 was obtained by electroporating the mhaB1 mutant, O35E.B1, with pRBO12EB2KO-Z and selecting for zeocin-resistant, spectinomycin-resistant colonies. Allelic exchange was confirmed by PCR (data not shown). Lack of expression of MhaB1 and MhaB2 was also verified by Western blotting (see Fig. 2A). It should be noted that all cloned inserts described in this section were sequenced to ensure fidelity.
Repair of isogenic mutations in the mhaC gene of strains O35E.C, O12E.C, and McGHS1.C by the use of congression. A streptomycin-resistant mutant of strain O35E, designated O35E.SM100, was obtained as previously reported by Attia and colleagues (4). The rpsL gene of O35E.SM100, which specifies resistance to streptomycin, was amplified with primers PsmF and PsmR, purified, and mixed with PCR products corresponding to the wild-type (WT) mhaC genes of strain O35E, O12E, or McGHS1. These amplicons were then mixed with a few colonies of the appropriate recipient strain (i.e., O35E.C, O12E.C, or McHGS1.C), placed in the middle of a TH agar plate, and incubated at 37°C for 3 h (natural transformation). Bacteria were aseptically suspended in broth and spread onto agar plates supplemented with streptomycin. Resistant colonies were next tested for the loss of Kanr, which is the marker that was used to disrupt the mhaC gene in the recipient strains O35E.C, O12E.C, and McGHS1.C (see above). This overall strategy yielded strains O35E.CR1, O12E.CR1, and McGHS1.CR1 in which the WT mhaC gene has been reintroduced in the chromosome. PCR was used to verify allelic exchange (data not shown), and the repaired strains were shown to express MhaC in their OM (see Fig. 5).
Construction of a plasmid expressing O12E MhaB1 and MhaC. A 2.1-kb amplicon corresponding to the intergenic region between O12E mhaC and mhaB2 was generated with primers P17 (5'-CAC CGC CTT TCT GCC AAA GT-3') and P18 (5'-TTG GCA AAT GCA GAA CCG CTA CAG-3') and cloned into pCC1 to yield the plasmid pSVCdwn. The plasmid was then mutagenized with the EZ::TN <KAN2> system (Epicenter) to obtain a construct containing a kanamycin-selectable marker near the middle of this region. The resulting plasmid, pSVCdwn-K, was electroporated in strain O12E, and kanamycin-resistant colonies were screened by PCR with primers P17 and P18 to identify the isogenic mutant strain O12E.dwn. Chromosomal DNA was isolated from this strain and used to create a plasmid-based library of large DNA fragments using the CopyControl Fosmid Library production kit (Epicenter). This library was introduced in the nonadherent E. coli cloning strain EPI300, and recombinant clones were selected for resistance to both chloramphenicol (vector marker) and kanamycin (chromosomal DNA from O12E.dwn downstream of the mhaC gene). This strategy identified the plasmid pRB.O12E.B1C, which specifies expression of O12E MhaC and MhaB1 (see Fig. 7A) and contains a kanamycin resistance marker in the intergenic region between mhaC and mhaB2. This construct was also used as a sequencing template.
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Western blot analysis and adherence assays of recombinant E. coli bacteria expressing O12E MhaC and MhaB1. (A) Sarkosyl-insoluble OM proteins were extracted from E. coli strains carrying the plasmids pCC1.3 (lane 1) and pRB.O12E.B1C (lane 2) and were then analyzed by immunoblotting with murine sera against MhaB and MhaC; molecular mass markers are shown in kilodaltons. (B) Duplicate adherence assays were performed on at least four separate occasions. The adherence is expressed as the percentage (±standard error) of inoculum bound to epithelial cells following a 3-h incubation. The Mann-Whitney test was used to determine whether the increase in adherence was statistically significant (*, P < 0.05). Ab, antibody.
|
Production of polyclonal antibodies. To obtain polypeptides for antibody production, a 0.7-kb PCR product encompassing amino acids (aa) 72 to 399 of O12E MhaB1 was amplified with primers P19 (5'-CCC AAG CTT GTT ATT TCT GAC AGT CAA GCA-3'; HindIII site underlined) and P20 (5'-CCT TAA TTA ACC AAT ACC TTG CAA GTT GGC AGT-3'; PacI site underlined), restricted, and cloned into the HindIII and PacI sites of the pETcoco-1 vector (Novagen). This yielded the plasmid pRBHis.MhaB.72.399 which encodes the in-frame, N-terminally histidine-tagged protein designated His-MhaB. A similar strategy was used to construct the plasmid pRB.His.MhaC.61.690 using the oligonucleotides P21 (5'-CCC AAG CTT CTT TCT GCA ATA ACG GAT GAT-3'; HindIII site underlined) and P22 (5'-CCT TAA TTA ACC AAA TTC AGG CGT CTT AAT TCC-3'; PacI site underlined). This construct specifies aa 61 to 690 of O12E MhaC joined to six N-terminal histidines and is referred to as His-MhaC. Both plasmid inserts were sequenced to verify fidelity.
The aforementioned recombinant proteins were individually overexpressed in the E. coli strain TUNER, extracted from inclusion bodies with the BugBuster HT protein extraction reagent and rLysozyme, and purified under denaturing conditions using the His-Bind resin system (Novagen). The protein refolding kit from Athena Enzyme Systems Group was used to determine the buffer composition suitable for refolding purified His-MhaC and His-MhaB proteins, and urea was removed from these preparations by dialyzing overnight at 4°C while gradually decreasing its concentration (4 M
2 M
1 M
no urea) over a period of 4 days. BALB/c mice were immunized with His-MhaB or His-MhaC as described elsewhere (30). Of note, the serum raised against His-MhaB reacts both with MhaB1 and MhaB2 because of the sequence identity in the N-terminal region of these proteins. Antibodies were demonstrated to specifically recognize MhaC or MhaB1/MhaB2 using whole-cell or OM preparations of the WT strain O35E, the mhaC mutant O35E.C, and the mhaB1 mhaB2 mutant O35E.B1B2 (data not shown). The MhaB antibodies cross-reacted with only one E. coli protein of
20 kDa (see Fig. 7, lane 1). The MhaC antibodies cross-reacted with a single E. coli protein of
20 kDa (data not shown). When testing M. catarrhalis preparations, the MhaB antibodies showed a low level of cross-reactivity with one protein of
60 kDa (data not shown), and the MhaC antibodies reacted only with the 65-kDa MhaC protein (Fig. 2B and 5B). The Western blotting results in Fig. 2, 4, and 5 only show the gel areas pertaining to the antigens under study (i.e., MhaC, MhaB1, and MhaB2).
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Western blot analysis of selected OM proteins expressed by M. catarrhalis isolates of various origins. OM vesicles were resolved on 7.5% polyacrylamide gels, transferred to PVDF membranes, and probed with murine sera against MhaC and MhaB. McaP antibodies (Ab) were also included in these experiments as loading indicators. Molecular mass markers are shown to the left in kilodaltons. This figure is a composite of separate Western blots, and therefore, O35E (lanes 1 and 10) was included as a reference strain.
|
Nucleotide sequence analysis. PCR products and plasmids were sequenced at the University of Michigan Sequencing Core. Chromatograms were assembled using the Chromatool software (Biotools). Nucleotide sequences were deposited in GenBank (see "Nucleotide sequence accession numbers" below). Sequence analysis was performed using Vector NTI 10.1 (Invitrogen).
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers. The nucleotide sequences of the O12E mhaC (EF362391), O35E mhaC (EF362390), McGHS1 mhaC (EF362392), Mc34F mhaC (EF362393), O46E mhaC (EF362394), TTA37 mhaC (EF362395), V1171 mhaC (EF362396), O12E mhaB1 (EF362386), O35E mhaB1 (EF362385), McGHS1 mhaB1 (EF362387), O12E mhaB2 (EF362389), and O35E mhaB2 (EF362388) ORFs were deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers indicated.
|
|
|---|
QI), indicating that the M. catarrhalis gene product is likely secreted. Further analysis with PSIPRED revealed that the ORF potentially contains 18 to 22 β-strands, suggesting a porin conformation. Database searches using Pfam also demonstrated that the N terminus of the O35E gene product possesses a POTRA2 domain (PF08479), which is present in a number of porin-like proteins responsible for the transport of polypeptides across the OM of gram-negative bacteria. Together, these observations suggest structural and functional similarities between the B. pertussis fhaC gene product and the M. catarrhalis O35E ORF. Thus, the ORF was named mhaC for Moraxella catarrhalis FhaC-like protein.
Sequence analysis upstream of O35E mhaC revealed the presence of a diverging ORF beginning 50 nt from the mhaC ATG start codon (Fig. 1). This ORF was found to be 5,181 nt in length and predicted to specify a protein of 184 kDa that resembles FhaB (expect value, 2e–28), the precursor of the adhesin FHA from B. pertussis BP536 (GenBank accession no. AAA22974) (40). A signal sequence cleavage site was detected between aa 69 and 70 (FA
NV), indicating that this M. catarrhalis gene product is likely secreted, and database searches revealed the presence of a carbohydrate-dependent hemagglutination activity domain (pfam05860.4) between aa 74 to 197. Hemagglutination activity domains are found in a number of proteins including the adhesins FhaB (B. pertussis) (31) and HMW1/HMW2 (Haemophilus influenzae) (11, 46), the Serratia marcescens hemolysin ShlA (43), and the large secreted proteins LspA1 and LspA2 of Haemophilus ducreyi (53-55). These proteins belong to the TpsA family of molecules, which are exoproteins secreted in a two-partner secretion (TPS) manner (27). Upon closer examination, we noted that residues 143 to 146 (NPFL) and 183 to 187 (NPSGI) of the O35E ORF correspond to two amino acid motifs present in the hemagglutination domain of most TpsA molecules and have been shown to be important for the proper secretion as well as activation of these exoproteins. Analysis of the O35E ORF also revealed another domain between aa 1221 to 1385 that is frequently associated with TpsA molecules (pfam04830.6). The similarities to B. pertussis FhaB and other TPS exoproteins prompted us to designate this ORF MhaB1 (Moraxella catarrhalis FhaB-like protein 1).
|
View larger version (4K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Schematic representation of the M. catarrhalis mhaB1 mhaC mhaB2 locus. The open bars represent the regions of the mhaB1 and mhaB2 gene products that are virtually identical, whereas the patterned arrowheads illustrate the regions of divergence.
|
MhaB1, MhaB2, and MhaC are expressed in the OM of the M. catarrhalis strain O35E and are involved in attachment to epithelial cells in vitro. To test the hypothesis that these gene products are involved in adherence, we disrupted the ORFs specifying these proteins and measured the binding of the resulting isogenic mutant strains to epithelial cell lines that are relevant to pathogenesis by M. catarrhalis. To verify that the mutants lacked expression of the intended gene products, OM preparations were obtained from WT and isogenic mha mutants and tested by Western blotting with antibodies against MhaC or antibodies binding to both MhaB1 and MhaB2 (MhaB reactive). The latter antibodies were obtained by immunizing mice with the purified recombinant protein His-MhaB which corresponds to aa 72 to 399 of MhaB1 fused to six N-terminal histidine residues (see Material and Methods). This portion of MhaB1 is identical to residues 72 to 399 of MhaB2 (data not shown), and therefore, antibodies raised against this polypeptide were expected to react with both MhaB1 and MhaB2. Blots were also probed with antibodies to the M. catarrhalis adhesin McaP as an indicator of protein loads in these experiments.
As shown in lane 2 of Fig. 2B, disrupting mhaC (strain O35E.C) resulted in the absence of a band reacting with MhaC-specific antibodies. In the WT strain, this band migrated with an apparent mass of
65 kDa, which is smaller than predicted by sequence analysis of the O35E mhaC gene (i.e., 78,589). MhaC is present in greater quantities in the OM of strains with mutations in mhaB1 (O35E.B1) (lane 3 in Fig. 2B), mhaB2 (O35E.B2) (lane 4 in Fig. 2B), or both (O35E.B1B2) (Fig. 2B, lane 5). Western blot analysis with antibodies against His-MhaB indicated that the WT isolate O35E (which should express both MhaB1 and MhaB2) and the mhaB1 isogenic mutant O35E.B1 (which should express only MhaB2) both yielded MhaB-reactive bands migrating with a similar apparent size of
120 kDa (Fig. 2A, lanes 1 and 3, respectively). These immunoblot experiments also revealed that the mhaB2 mutant O35E.B2 (presumably expressing only MhaB1) produces a protein that reacts with the MhaB antibodies and appears slightly larger than the MhaB-reactive band observed in O35E and O35.B1 (compare lane 4 to lanes 1 and 3 in Fig. 2A). Of note, this difference in size between MhaB1 and MhaB2 is reproducible and has been observed in several experiments involving electrophoresis of OM preparations for varying periods of time. These observations suggest that MhaB2 is primarily expressed in the parent strain O35E and that the slightly larger MhaB1 protein is expressed at detectable levels only in the absence of MhaB2. As expected, the His-MhaB antibodies no longer reacted with an
120 kDa band in the OM of the mhaB1 mhaB2 double mutant O35E.B1B2 (Fig. 2A, lane 5). Furthermore, it was discovered that the His-MhaB antibodies did not react with this
120-kDa band in the OM of the mhaC mutant O35E.C (Fig. 2A, lane 2), although the antibodies clearly recognized the antigen in whole-cell preparations of the mutant (data not shown). These results support the hypothesis that these proteins are OM located and comprise a TPS system where MhaC functions as a transporter which is necessary for the secretion and localization of MhaB1 and MhaB2 in the OM of M. catarrhalis strain O35E.
When the mha mutants were tested in attachment assays, it was discovered that all mutations significantly decreased binding to HEp2 monolayers (Fig. 3A). The absence of MhaC (O35E.C) or MhaB2 (alone in O35E.B2, or together with MhaB1 in O35E.B1B2) in the OM of mutants also resulted in a statistically significant decrease in adherence to 16HBE14o– cells, whereas the mhaB1 mutant (O35E.B1) attached at WT levels to these monolayers (Fig. 3B). Binding to Chang monolayers was found to be reduced only in the isogenic mutant strain lacking expression of both MhaB1 and MhaB2 (i.e., O35E.B1B2) (Fig. 3C). Disruption of the mha genes did not have a statistically significant effect on the attachment of M. catarrhalis O35E to NCIH292 or A549 cells (Fig. 3D and 3E). Of note, the reduction in adherence of the O35E mha mutants was not due to lower expression of other known M. catarrhalis adhesins, as the presence of Hag, McaP, OMPCD, and UspA1 was verified by Western blot analysis (data not shown). These results demonstrate that the mhaC and mhaB2 gene products are involved in the adherence of M. catarrhalis strain O35E to HEp2 and 16HBE14o– cells and that MhaB1 participates in the binding of this isolate to HEp2 cells. Expression of both MhaB1 and MhaB2 also appears to contribute to adherence to Chang monolayers.
![]() View larger version (18K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Adherence of M. catarrhalis strain O35E (black bars) and mha mutants (open bars) to human epithelial cells in vitro. Adherence is expressed as the percentage (±standard error) of inoculated bacteria bound to epithelial cells following a 5-min incubation (shown on y axes). The Mann-Whitney test was used to determine whether decreases in adherence were statistically significant (*, P < 0.05).
|
120 kDa were also detected in the OM preparations of 7P94B1, 11P29B1, and TTA24 (data not shown). The mhaC genes from six isolates (O12E, McGHS1, Mc34F, TTA37, O46E, and V1171) were amplified by PCR and sequenced to assess conservation. The mhaC gene products from these strains (and O35E) were found to be highly conserved (98 to 99% identity). The mhaC ORFs from O12E, O35E, McGHS1, Mc34F, and O46E were each 705 aa in length, whereas those from V1171, TTA37, and the previously published ATCC 43617 strain (nt 58937 to 61048 of GenBank accession no. AX067458) were lacking a phenylalanine at codon 140, resulting in the smaller ORFs of 704 aa. Of note, the mhaC gene was amplified from strain TTA37 which did not demonstrate expression of either MhaC- or MhaB-reactive proteins in its OM (Fig. 4).
The nucleotide sequences of the mhaB1 ORFs from strains O12E and McGHS1 were also determined, and their gene products were found to be highly conserved (90% identity) (Table 2). The MhaB1 proteins of strains O12E and O35E were virtually identical (98%), whereas the McGHS1 gene product shared 90% identity with the O12E and O35E MhaB1 proteins (Table 2). The dissimilarity among these molecules was localized to their C termini, as residues 1 to 1,552 were 99.2% identical (data not shown). Nucleotide sequence analyses of mhaB2 from strains O12E and O35E revealed that the gene products also diverged toward their C termini. Amino acids 1 to 1,200 were found to be 99.5% identical, while the remainder of these two MhaB2 molecules only exhibit 19.3% identity (data not shown); O12E and O35E MhaB2 were well conserved with an overall identity of 68.8% (Table 2). It should be noted that even though strain McGHS1 appears to contain a mhaB2 gene based on PCR analysis, several attempts at amplifying and sequencing this gene in its entirety were unsuccessful. Comparison of O12E-MhaB1 and O12E-MhaB2 indicated that these proteins were better conserved than their O35E counterparts (82.4% versus 69.5%) (Table 2). This higher level of identity between the O12E MhaB proteins was due to the fact that their first 1,441 residues, as opposed to 1,200 in the O35E molecules, were perfectly conserved; the remainder of the O12E MhaB proteins only displayed 10.8% identity (data not shown).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Comparison of predicted amino acid sequences of the mhaB1 and mhaB2 genes of M. catarrhalis strains O35E, O12E, and McGHS1a
|
When the adherence of the mhaC mutants was compared to that of their respective parent strains, substantial decreases in adherence were observed (Fig. 6). Disruption of the mhaC gene in McGHS1 significantly reduced binding to HEp2 and A549 but not NCIH292, 16HBE14o–, or Chang cells. The absence of the Mha proteins in the OM of the mutant O12E.C resulted in decreased adherence to HEp2, NCIH292, 16HBE14o–, and Chang monolayers. Although the adherence of the O12E mhaC mutant to A549 cells appeared lower, this difference was not statistically significant. Interestingly, the contribution of the Mha proteins to epithelial cell binding varies among the isolates tested. For example, disruption of mhaC affects adherence of strains O35E and O12E to 16HBE14o– cells but not that of McGHS1, whereas McGHS1.C is the only mutant exhibiting significantly lower binding to A549 pneumocytes (Fig. 6). Overall, our data clearly demonstrate that the role of these TPS proteins in adherence is conserved among M. catarrhalis isolates.
![]() View larger version (14K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Adherence of M. catarrhalis WT (black bars) and mhaC mutant (open bars) strains to human epithelial cells in vitro. Adherence is expressed as the percentage (±standard error) of inoculated bacteria bound to epithelial cells following a 5-min incubation (shown on y axes). The Mann-Whitney test was used to determine whether decreases in adherence were statistically significant (*, P < 0.05).
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Adherence of M. catarrhalis strains to HEp2 cells
|
|
|
|---|
First, MhaB1, MhaB2, and MhaC were identified on the basis of the similarity of their sequences, as well as predicted structural features, to the well-characterized FHA proteins of B. pertussis. Secondly, we discovered that, like FHA and other TPS exoproteins such as H. influenzae HMW1 and HMW2, MhaB1 and MhaB2 are involved in adherence to certain human epithelial cell types. Upon closer examination of the attachment assays with our panel of O35E mutants to Chang, NCIH292, and 16HBE14o– cells (Fig. 3), we noted a conserved pattern of adherence. The strains exhibiting the lowest level of binding were consistently O35E.B1B2 and O35E.C, both of which lack MhaB1 and MhaB2 in their OM (Fig. 2A). The mhaB2 mutant O35E.B2, which only expresses MhaB1 in its OM, also displayed reduced adherence to epithelial cells, though not to the same extent as O35E.C and O35E.B1B2. The mutant O35E.B1, which only expresses MhaB2 in its OM, attached to monolayers at levels undistinguishable from that of the WT strain O35E. Although some of the decreases in adherence to Chang and NCIH292 cells were not statistically significant (Fig. 3), the aforementioned attachment pattern of the mutants is clearly distinguishable. These observations indicate that expression of MhaB2 in the OM of strain O35E is necessary for WT levels of adherence, which is consistent with the Western blot analysis of our panel of mutants in which MhaB2 appears to be the TPS exoprotein that is primarily expressed by strain O35E (Fig. 2A), and thus, one might expect MhaB2's contribution to adherence by this WT isolate to be greater than that of MhaB1.
This adherence pattern of O35E mha mutants to NCIH292, 16HBE14o–, and Chang cells suggests that MhaB1 plays little or no role in adherence by M. catarrhalis strain O35E. This interpretation, however, is contradicted by the results of attachment assays using HEp2 cells in which comparable decreases in adherence were seen for O35E.B1, O35E.B2, O35E.C, and O35E.B1B2 (Fig. 3A). MhaB1 thus appears to be involved in M. catarrhalis adherence to HEp2 monolayers, and this hypothesis is supported by the fact that expression of MhaB1 and MhaC in the OM of a nonadherent cloning strain of E. coli leads to a gain of adherence to these laryngeal cells (Fig. 7). Clearly, the adhesive properties of the MhaB1 and MhaB2 proteins are complex. Studying their expression under conditions resembling those in attachment assays, using methods such as Western blotting with monoclonal antibodies specific for each adhesin or quantitative real-time PCR, may help in elucidating their respective contributions to M. catarrhalis adherence.
Because we were not able to express MhaB2 in recombinant E. coli, it is not clear whether this protein directly mediates adherence to epithelial cells or if MhaB2 expression is necessary for proper display of MhaB1 (or other adhesins) on the surface of M. catarrhalis cells. However, our data support a direct involvement for MhaB2. Our panel of mutants were found to express WT levels of Hag and UspA1 (data not shown), which have been previously shown to play major roles in the binding of strain O35E to Chang (1) and A549 cells (22), respectively. Based on these reports, one might expect that improper surface display of UspA1 and/or Hag to result in 60-fold (for Chang cells) and 10-fold (for A549 cells) reductions in attachment. As shown in Fig. 3C and E, the lack of expression of MhaB2 in the mutant O35E.B2 did not result in such decreases. Furthermore, expression of MhaB1 by recombinant E. coli increased binding to HEp-2 cells (Fig. 7), thus demonstrating that MhaB2 expression is not necessary for MhaB1 to function as an adhesin.
Our Western blot analysis of the O35E mutants suggests that MhaB1 migrates with a different mass than, and is present at detectable levels in the OM only in the absence of, MhaB2 (Fig. 2A). Interestingly, a similar occurrence has been reported by Ward and colleagues (53) for the H. ducreyi TPS system specifying the large supernatant proteins LspA1 and LspA2. Using monoclonal antibodies, these investigators demonstrated that culture supernatants of the H. ducreyi WT strain 3500HP contain LspA1 but barely detectable levels of LspA2. It was also discovered that an lspA1 mutant expressed greater levels of LspA2 than the WT strain 3500HP. Whether MhaB1 and MhaB2 are coordinately expressed in a similar manner remains to be determined by the use of monoclonal antibodies specifically recognizing each molecule.
The predicted amino acid sequences of MhaB1 from strains O35E, O12E, and McGHS1 were 90 to 98% identical, indicating a high level of conservation. The mhaB2 gene products, however, were more divergent (68.8% identity), particularly in the last one-third of the proteins (19.3% identity). It is tempting to speculate that this higher level of sequence divergence in the MhaB2 proteins might be the result of selective pressure for antigenic variation in vivo. This hypothesis would be consistent with our Western blot analysis, suggesting that MhaB2 is primarily expressed (relative to MhaB1) in the wild-type isolate O35E. The high level of sequence homology between these proteins makes them attractive as vaccine targets. In addition, our Western blots indicate that at least 63% of isolates express MhaB-reactive antigens in their OM. Of note, these preparations were obtained from cultures grown at 37°C in TH broth which may not represent the optimal conditions for expression of these TPS proteins. This hypothesis is supported by our finding that strain TTA37 specifies a mhaC gene product which does not appear to be expressed in the OM of this isolate (Fig. 4).
MhaC appears to comply with what is known of the TPS transporter family. These molecules are well-conserved among various organisms at the amino acid level as well as structurally (26, 27) and are considered members of the Omp85 family of proteins (15, 50). As observed with other Omp85-like proteins, the secondary structure of MhaC is predicted to be rich in β-strands, which is suggestive of a β-barrel porin-like conformation in the OM. Another characteristic of these β-barrel proteins is aberrant migration when resolved by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. As shown in Fig. 2B, the mature MhaC protein, predicted to be 78 kDa, resolves at
65 kDa, which is substantially smaller than its predicted size. Whether MhaC forms a β-barrel structure that permits the specific passage of MhaB1 and MhaB2 across the OM of M. catarrhalis remains to be elucidated. Fleckenstein and colleagues recently reported data suggesting an adhesive role for the transporter of a TPS system expressed by uropathogenic E. coli (12), a finding which had not been previously reported for other TPS systems. Our results showing that mhaC mutants of strains O35E, O12E, and McGHS1 all exhibit reduced binding to epithelial cells (Fig. 7) raises the possibility that the M. catarrhalis MhaC protein might directly mediate adherence. The fact that the O35E.B1B2 mutant, which lacks expression of MhaB1 and MhaB2 but expresses MhaC in its OM (Fig. 2), exhibits the same defect in adherence as the O35E mhaC strain O35E.C, which lacks OM expression of all three proteins, argues against this possibility. Furthermore, while attempting to identify recombinant E. coli bacteria expressing both the M. catarrhalis MhaC and MhaB2 proteins, we generated several clones that expressed MhaC in their OM. When tested in attachment assays, these constructs did not bind to epithelial cells (data not shown). Thus, it is unlikely that the M. catarrhalis transporter MhaC itself possesses adhesive properties.
In summary, our data show that MhaC, MhaB1, and MhaB2 are highly conserved OM proteins expressed by several M. catarrhalis isolates. In strain O35E, MhaB1 and MhaB2 function as adhesins, though their specific contribution to human cell attachment remains to be elucidated. The role of MhaB1 and MhaB2 in adherence appears to be conserved, as isogenic mutants of strains O12E and McGHS1 lacking expression of MhaB-reactive antigens in their OM also have reduced binding to human epithelial cells. Furthermore, our results demonstrate that MhaB1 and MhaB2 rely on the transporter protein MhaC to reach the OM of M. catarrhalis, and as such, these three molecules constitute a novel TPS system. Future studies will be aimed at determining the cell-binding specificities of the MhaB proteins as well as to explore the vaccinogenic potential of these surface-located antigens.
We thank Anthony Campagnari and Pascale Plamondon at the State University of New York at Buffalo for providing strain 7169. We also thank Eric Hansen at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas and Tim Murphy at the State University New York at Buffalo for providing M. catarrhalis strains and antibodies. We also express our thanks to Brian Bullard, Christine Akimana, William Grose, Robert Blumenthal, Mark Wooten, and Randall Worth for their helpful comments on the manuscript.
Published ahead of print on 19 March 2007. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»