Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, July 2007, p. 3462-3469, Vol. 75, No. 7
0019-9567/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/IAI.01470-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Departments of Internal Medicine and Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Center for Comparative Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California
Received 13 September 2006/ Returned for modification 26 November 2006/ Accepted 2 May 2007
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Mucosal immunization is a route commonly used to induce mucosal immunity. While immunizing through a mucosal route seems optimal for eliciting mucosal immunity, no studies have reported its success in the generation of H. pylori immunologic memory. Unlike for Helicobacter felis, against which long-term protection can be achieved through immunization, a long-term-protection model for H. pylori has yet to be reported (27, 33). Recent studies have demonstrated that immunization through a combination of mucosal and systemic routes may increase mucosal immunity (22, 25, 39, 40).
The mechanisms by which protection against H. pylori occurs are still unknown. In general, immune responses, such as local and systemic antibody and cytokine production, may be used as immunological surrogate markers for protection. For H. pylori, recent literature shows that, except for the interleukin-12 (IL-12) response, most cytokine and antibody responses do not directly correlate with short-term protection. After immunization, IL-12 knockout mice maintained bacterial levels equivalent to those of unimmunized controls when challenged with H. pylori, while wild-type animals had a decrease in bacterial load in the stomach (2). In addition to the IL-12 response, a strong adaptive Th1 immune response has been shown to aid in protection (3, 5, 9, 44). However, these data were generated during the acute effector phase; thus, identifying correlates of protection following a long-term resting period is of great interest.
Herein, we compared immunization methods that combined both mucosal and systemic routes in order to determine which prime/boost regimen would be most effective in eliciting long-term mucosal immunity and protection from H. pylori challenge. Mice were immunized orally alone (oral group), intramuscularly (i.m.) alone (i.m. group), orally followed by i.m. (oral/i.m. group), or i.m. followed by orally (i.m./oral group) and then challenged orally with live H. pylori 3 months following the final immunization. Our goal was to establish the most efficient route(s) of immunization for induction and maintenance of long-term immunity and to more accurately identify immunologic correlates of protection.
|
|
|---|
H. pylori culturing and vaccine preparation. H. pylori mouse-adapted Sydney strain 1 (SS1) was subcultured on brucella agar for 48 h prior to passage into brucella broth, both supplemented with 5% newborn calf serum. For H. pylori challenge, the liquid culture was harvested, with the final concentration adjusted to 109 bacteria/ml for each single dose of 0.1 ml in brucella broth (108). For vaccine preparation, the liquid culture was harvested at mid-log phase (optical density at 600 nm of 0.4 to 0.6) and pelleted by centrifugation. Pellets were resuspended in sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and sonicated (Sonic Dismembrator 550; Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) on ice with five 10-s pulses at an amplitude between 7 and 9. Protein was measured via a protein concentration measurement assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) at an optical density of 595 nm. H. pylori SS1 sonicate was used for both vaccination and immunoassays (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA], Luminex assay, and enzyme-linked immunospot [ELISPOT] assay).
Immunizations, challenge, and experimental design. Five groups of mice were immunized five times at 10-day intervals. Oral immunizations consisted of 100 µg of H. pylori sonicate and 10 µg cholera toxin (CT) (Sigma) suspended in 0.5 ml of 3% sodium bicarbonate, administered by gavage, whereas i.m. immunizations contained 10 µg H. pylori sonicate and 1 µg CT injected into the right thigh muscle. The groups were structured as follows. The i.m. group (n = 12) received five immunizations i.m., the oral group (n = 12) received five immunizations orally, the oral/i.m. group (n = 9) received three oral followed by two i.m. immunizations, the i.m./oral group (n = 10) received two i.m. followed by three oral immunizations, and the mock-infected (mock) control group (n = 10) received three oral immunizations and two i.m. immunizations of 3% sodium bicarbonate (oral) or PBS (i.m.) (Table 1). Sera were collected 7 days after the final immunization, 3 months after the final immunization prechallenge, and 7 days postchallenge. Animals were challenged 3 months after the final immunization and sacrificed 8 days later. Mice were challenged with three doses of 108 CFU of H. pylori SS1, suspended in 0.1 ml brucella broth, at 2-day intervals. Doses were administered by oral gavage using a ball-end feeding needle. Mice were euthanized with an overdose of pentobarbital sodium solution (Nembutal; Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, IL). Peyer's patches, spleens, and stomachs were sterilely collected from all mice at the time of sacrifice.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Schedule of immunization, challenge, and sacrifice
|
Antigen-specific cytokine assays.
Antigen-specific IL-4 responses in lymphocytes from immunized mice were measured using an ELISPOT assay as previously described (40). Briefly, 2 x 106 lymphocytes were added to polyvinylidene difluoride plates (Millipore) precoated with rat anti-mouse IL-4 (Endogen, Woburn, MA) and blocked with complete RPMI-10% FBS. Cells were then incubated with 50 µg/ml of H. pylori sonicate for 13 h at 37°C. Following incubation, supernatants from all ELISPOT assay plates were collected and frozen at 80°C for use in Luminex assays. Plates were washed with PBS-0.02% Tween 20 and incubated at room temperature for 2 h with biotinylated rat anti-mouse IL-4 (Endogen) in PBS-0.02% Tween 20-0.1% bovine serum albumin. Plates were washed and incubated with avidin-peroxidase (1 h at 37°C), followed by diaminobenzidine substrate in Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) buffer for 15 min. Spots were counted by use of a Zeiss KS automatic ELISPOT reader. Luminex technology was used to detect the remaining cytokines from 50 µl of previously frozen cell culture supernatant. IL-1ß, IL-2, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, gamma interferon (IFN-
), and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-
) levels were measured according to the manufacturer's instructions by using a Beadlyte mouse multicytokine detection system 2 (Upstate, Lake Placid, NY) and Luminex 100 (Luminex, Austin, TX). A minimum of 100 beads were read, and data were analyzed by MasterPlexQT software (MiraiBio, Alameda, CA) using five-parameter logistics.
Antigen-specific antibody assays. H. pylori-specific IgG1, IgG2a, and IgA titers were measured from both serum and cell culture supernatant from lymphocytes isolated as described above and cultured overnight in complete RPMI-10% FBS at 2 x 105 cells/ml. U-bottomed, 96-well ELISA plates (Nunc Maxisorp, Denmark) were coated with 5 µg/well H. pylori sonicate in PBS overnight at 4°C. Plates were washed with PBS-0.3% Tween 20 and then blocked with PBS-2% goat serum (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA) for 1 h at 37°C. Serum samples were added at an initial dilution of 1:200 in duplicate, with 1:3 serial dilutions performed in PBS-2% goat serum. Cell culture supernatant was serially diluted 1:3 in PBS-2% goat serum. Plates were incubated for 1 h at 37°C and then washed in PBS-0.3% Tween 20. A 1:10,000 dilution of biotinylated goat anti-mouse IgG1, IgG2a, or IgA (Southern Biotech, Birmingham, AL) was added to the plates for 1 h at 37°C. Plates were washed and then incubated with a 1:1,000 dilution of streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase (BD/Pharmingen) for 1 h at 37°C. Plates were again washed, developed with tetramethylbenzidine (Kirkegaard and Perry, Gaithersburg, MD) for 10 min, and stopped with 2 M HCl. The optical density of each well was measured at 450 nm on a VMax plate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA).
Quantitative H. pylori culture from gastric tissue. Stomachs were divided in half longitudinally for quantitative analysis of H. pylori infection. Briefly, samples were placed in 300 µl of brucella broth, weighed, and homogenized using a sterile ground-glass pestle. Tenfold serial dilutions were plated on brucella agar plates and incubated in a 5% CO2 incubator for 5 to 7 days. H. pylori isolates were identified by colony morphology, microscopy, and biochemistry. The CFU per gram of gastric mucosa was calculated by enumerating colonies, adjusting for the dilution, and dividing by the tissue weight.
Statistical analysis. The primary analysis was a comparison between immunized groups and mock controls. Secondary comparisons among immunized groups were performed selectively as described in Results. Statistical significance was assessed by a nonparametric Mann-Whitney test for multiple comparisons. Differences between groups were considered statistically significant at a P value of <0.005 based on a Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. SPSS (Statistical Product and Service Solutions) comprehensive statistical software was utilized for all analyses.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (13K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. H. pylori-specific IgG1 and IgG2a titers measured by ELISA during the acute effector phase (after the fifth immunization) and prechallenge. Sera were collected 7 days after the fifth immunization, during the acute effector phase (a and b), and prior to challenge, 3 months later (c and d) (means ± standard errors of the means). IM, i.m.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Serum IgG1/IgG2a titer ratios
|
![]() View larger version (7K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Bacterial loads in stomach after oral challenge. Mean log10 CFU/gram of tissue obtained 8 days after challenge. Open symbols denote unprotected groups, and filled symbols denote protected groups. IM, i.m.
|
![]() View larger version (20K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Serum and Peyer's patch antibody responses following oral challenge. H. pylori-specific antibody titers in sera were measured by ELISA 7 days after challenge (a, b, and c) or in culture supernatant from Peyer's patches 8 days after challenge (d) (means ± standard errors of the means). IM, i.m.
|
Innate-type cytokine responses following challenge.
It is unclear how immunization through different routes may affect innate immune responses following H. pylori challenge. Although innate responses are induced early after immunization or challenge, we reasoned that some innate-type cytokine responses may persist postchallenge. Therefore, we next measured several innate-type cytokines thought to be involved in H. pylori infection. Innate-type cytokines were found only in splenocytes and were not detected from Peyer's patches or gastric lymphocytes. All immunized groups secreted significantly more granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, IL-1ß, and TNF-
than the mock control group. However, no significant differences were seen among the groups (data not shown). The i.m., oral, and oral/i.m. groups all produced more IL-10 than the mock control group, while the i.m./oral group did not (P < 0.005) (Fig. 4a). Only i.m.-immunized mice secreted increased levels of IL-12 that were significantly higher than those for the mock controls (P < 0.005) (Fig. 4b). While oral/i.m.-immunized mice also secreted increased levels of IL-12, these levels did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.02). Overall, these data show that while all routes of immunization produced significant innate-type cytokine responses, enhanced IL-12 secretion was detected in the protected groups.
![]() View larger version (8K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. IL-10 and IL-12 responses following oral challenge. Splenocytes were cultured with H. pylori sonicate and assayed for IL-10 (a) and IL-12 (b) production by Luminex assay. Open symbols denote unprotected groups, and filled symbols denote protected groups. IM, i.m.
|
and IL-2 than the mock controls (P < 0.005) (Fig. 5a and b). There was no significant difference among the experimental groups when measuring IFN-
. However, the oral and the oral/i.m. groups produced more IL-2 than the i.m. group (P < 0.005). Mice receiving systemic immunizations (i.m., oral/i.m., and i.m./oral) produced significantly more IL-5 (P < 0.005) than the mock group, while the oral group did not (Fig. 6a). Although there was no difference in IL-6 production among the groups, these levels were all significantly higher than that for the mock controls (P < 0.005) (Fig. 6b). All groups secreted significantly more IL-4 than the mock group (P < 0.005), with the i.m./oral group secreting the largest amount (Fig. 6c). Together, these data suggest that the combinations or single routes of mucosal/systemic immunizations stimulated both Th1 and Th2 adaptive responses following challenge.
![]() View larger version (8K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. IFN- and IL-2 antigen-specific responses following oral challenge. Splenocytes were cultured with H. pylori sonicate and assayed for IFN- (a) and IL-2 (b) production by Luminex assay. Open symbols denote unprotected groups, and filled symbols denote protected groups. IM, i.m.
|
![]() View larger version (7K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. IL-5, IL-6, and IL-4 antigen-specific responses following oral challenge. Splenocytes were cultured with H. pylori sonicate and assayed for IL-5 (a) and IL-6 (b) production by Luminex assay. IL-4 (c) secretion was measured by ELISPOT assay. Open symbols denote unprotected groups, and filled symbols denote protected groups. IM, i.m.
|
|
|
|---|
Many studies have shown that protection against H. pylori can be achieved through vaccination by either the mucosal or the systemic route (11, 13, 15, 20, 24, 34, 35, 43). Immunogenicity studies have also shown that the combination of mucosal priming followed by systemic boosting results in high antigen-specific antibody responses (25, 39, 40). However, in most H. pylori vaccine/protection studies immunized animals were challenged within a month after immunization, whereas we challenged the animals 3 months after immunization (11, 13, 15, 20, 24, 34, 35, 43). Challenging animals while still in the acute phase after vaccination (1 to 6 weeks) does not predict immunity during the resting memory phase, when the host would most likely be exposed to H. pylori.
A study by Garhart et al. focusing on H. pylori eradication postchallenge reported that there were no significant differences in H. pylori bacterial load between vaccinated and unvaccinated mice 1 week postchallenge and that there was only a slight difference at 2 weeks postchallenge (10). However, a significant reduction in bacterial load was observed by week 4 and remained up to a year. To observe peak humoral and cellular immune responses, mice in our study were sacrificed 8 days after challenge, which, according to the Garhart study, was not optimal for measuring decreased colonization. This observation likely explains why our study showed only a modest (less than 2 log), yet still significant, decrease in bacterial load. It is likely that the decreases would have been greater if the mice had been sacrificed at a later time point. Therefore, in this study we have defined protection as a statistically significant decrease in bacterial load in vaccinated groups compared to that for mock controls.
It is commonly accepted that systemic immunization (specifically i.m.) is not optimal for inducing long-term mucosal immunity (7, 17, 30, 42). However, we found that 3 months after i.m. or oral/i.m. immunization mice were protected from oral H. pylori challenge, whereas after oral or i.m./oral immunization mice were not protected. These data suggest that i.m. immunizations induce immune effector functions that can reach the stomach mucosa and may confer protection following a long-term resting period.
After clearance, H. pylori reinfection can occur readily even in the face of a robust antibody response (1, 26, 31, 41). It has been shown that vaccination through a mucosal route can provide long-term protection against other pathogens (19, 23, 27, 33). However, unlike immunity against H. felis, long-term protective immunity against H. pylori has yet to be achieved (27, 33, 38). Our study is the first of its kind to demonstrate that protection against H. pylori can occur 3 months after immunization, when responses are beyond the acute effector phase, and that protection can occur in mice immunized either systemically alone or through mucosal followed by systemic routes. It is of interest to note that the two routes leading to protection ended with systemic (i.m.) boosts.
The correlates of protection for H. pylori immunity are not clearly defined. However, recent studies have suggested the importance of IL-12 as a correlate of protection against H. pylori challenge. Secreted factors from H. pylori have been shown to inhibit IL-12 production (16), and IL-12 genetic polymorphisms in H. pylori-infected patients may play a role in cancer acquisition (28). Additionally, Akhiani et al. determined that IL-12 is necessary for protection against H. pylori infection in studies where IL-12 knockout mice were unable to mount a protective immune response upon challenge (2). The increase in IL-12 that we report for protected groups (i.m. and oral/i.m. groups) is consistent with these results, indicating that IL-12 may be a correlate of protection. Many other cytokines, such as IL-2, IL-4, IFN-
, and TNF-
, have been suggested to correlate with protection (3, 29, 35, 40). However, we were unable to detect a direct correlation between protection and these cytokines (Fig. 4 to 6). Since the mechanisms of H. pylori clearance in protected animals are still not well established, more-detailed studies that focus on antigen-specific cytokine and cellular responses in local tissues, comparing before and after challenge (i.e., vaccinated, uninfected controls), as well as gastritis following immunizations and a long-term resting phase would shed more light on this issue.
In contrast to results with cytokine production, several studies have suggested that H. pylori-specific antibodies do not appear to play a role in protection (9). Specifically, Garhart et al. showed that immunized, antibody-deficient mice were protected from H. pylori challenge similarly to their wild-type counterparts (9). Our results, however, demonstrate that IgG1 and IgG2a titers may serve as a correlate of protective immunity, with an increase in both IgG1 and IgG2a after challenge in the protected groups (i.m. alone and oral/i.m.). These results are consistent with a previous study in which mucosal followed by systemic immunizations with H. pylori NAP and CagA yielded higher IgG1 serum responses than either the mucosal or the systemic route alone (40).
IgA, on the other hand, is considered the primary mucosal antibody and is suggested in some studies to be necessary for protection against H. pylori (11, 29). However, a study by Akhiani et al. recently reported that production of IgA and IL-10 is disadvantageous because they can suppress the protective inflammatory Th1 response at the site of infection (4). Our study supports these findings in that mice immunized through the oral route alone or the i.m./oral routes had high H. pylori-specific IgA titers from both splenocytes and Peyer's patches and were not protected from challenge. Similarly, IL-10 production appeared to be slightly higher (though not statistically significant) in the oral and i.m./oral groups.
Immunization solely through a mucosal route is commonly employed to induce mucosal immunity. However, our study showed that the systemic route alone or the mucosal followed by the systemic route was protective against oral challenge 3 months after immunization, while the mucosal route (oral) or the combination of i.m./oral routes was not. These studies were performed with CT as the adjuvant for all groups, indicating that the sole factor of protection is the route of immunization. This concept is made even clearer when considering the differences between the oral/i.m. and the i.m./oral groups. These two groups differed only in the order in which the vaccine was given, but one was protective (oral/i.m.) and the other was not (i.m./oral). The processes regulating these differing responses are unknown yet have been described for other systems. Studies of vaccines against polio (14) and influenza (8) have shown enhanced immunity from i.m. boost only in individuals that were preexposed mucosally. Thus, there appears to be a protective benefit when the final boost is given systemically.
In this study, the only two routes of immunization tested were i.m. and oral. Evaluations of combinations of other systemic and mucosal routes, such as subcutaneous, intraperitoneal, and intranasal immunizations, would be of great interest. Intranasal immunizations against H. pylori have been shown to be effective against challenge (20, 35). While the oral and i.m. routes of immunization may be clinically the most practical, exploring other routes will be of scientific interest.
We thank Giuseppe del Giudice and Paolo Ruggiero (helpful discussion), Paul Luciw and Imran Khan (technical support and assay development), Jennifer Huff (animal handling, technical support, and helpful discussion), and Jerome Braun (statistical support).
Published ahead of print on 14 May 2007. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»