Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current Issue
• Archive
• Alerts
• About ASM
• Contact us
• Tech Support
• Journals.ASM.org

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Krawczyk, C. M. Articles by Pearce, E. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Krawczyk, C. M. Articles by Pearce, E. J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Infection and Immunity, July 2007, p. 3556-3560, Vol. 75, No. 7
0019-9567/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/IAI.00086-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Memory CD4 T Cells Enhance Primary CD8 T-Cell Responses

Connie M. Krawczyk,^1,2 Hao Shen,^2* and Edward J. Pearce^1*

Department of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine,¹ Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104²

Received 15 January 2007/ Returned for modification 23 February 2007/ Accepted 5 April 2007

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS AND DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
CD4 T-cell help is required for optimal memory CD8 T-cell responses. We have found that engaging preexisiting CD4 Th1, but not Th2, memory cells at the time of CD8 T-cell priming results in increased CD8 effector responses to both bacterial and viral pathogens. The enhanced responses are characterized by increased numbers of cytokine-producing, antigen-specific cells. These findings suggest that engaging endogenous memory Th1 cells may increase cellular responses in an immunotherapy or vaccination setting.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS AND DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
CD4 T-cell help influences the magnitude and quality of the CD8 T-cell response. In some systems, the primary CD8 T-cell responses primed in the absence of CD4 T-cell help are deficient relative to those primed in the presence of T-cell help (1, 4, 12). In other experimental systems, CD4 cells are not required for effective primary CD8 responses (7, 9). However, more profound and consistent deficiencies are observed in memory CD8 T-cell populations when they are generated in the absence of CD4 T-cell help (4, 7, 9, 10). During a primary immune response, CD4 and CD8 T cells expand and differentiate simultaneously, acquiring an effector function 2 to 5 days following antigenic challenge, suggesting that the delivery of help by Th cells may be delayed. In contrast, memory CD4 T cells respond rapidly in response to antigenic challenge, potentially allowing the immediate delivery of help to CD8 T cells, which could influence early events in CD8 T-cell responses. Here we used a system in which CD8 T-cell responses are primed in the presence of T-cell help from preexisiting memory CD4 T cells. Specifically, mice primed with dendritic cells (DCs) pulsed with a major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC-II)-restricted peptide, LLO₁₉₀ (NEKYAQAYPNVS), from the listeriolysin O protein of Listeria monocytogenes, which generates an LLO₁₉₀-specific Th response, are subsequently challenged with recombinant L. monocytogenes expressing the MHC-I-restricted epitope of ovalbumin (Ova₂₅₇, SIINFEKL) (rLMova) (8). This experimental system allows analysis of the primary CD8 T-cell response to Ova in a setting where the LLO₁₉₀-specific memory CD4 T-cell population has been engaged. In this study, we showed that engaging memory T helper cells at the time of naïve CD8 T-cell priming enhances CD8 T-cell responses. The enhanced responses are characterized by increased numbers of cytokine-producing, antigen-specific cells. These findings suggest that engaging endogenous memory Th1 cells may increase cellular responses in an immunotherapy or vaccination setting.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS AND DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Mice and reagents. C57BL/6 (B6) mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratories and were housed according to animal care guidelines at the University of Pennsylvania. Conjugated antibodies used to detect CD4, CD8, gamma interferon (IFN-), interleukin-2 (IL-2), and IL-4 for fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis were purchased from Pharmingen. LLO_190-201 (NEKYAQAYPNVS) and Ova_257-264 (SIINFEKL) were purchased from Invitrogen. Ova-specific T cells were detected using MHC-I tetramers (K^b/Ova_257-264). rLMova was prepared as described previously (2, 8) and was grown in brain heart infusion medium for 15 h at 37°C; 3 x 10⁴ CFU per mouse was injected intravenously unless otherwise indicated.

DC culture. Bone marrow DC precursors were differentiated for 8 to 10 days in the presence of 20 ng/ml of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in RPMI containing 10% fetal calf serum, 100 U/ml penicillin/streptomycin, 50 µM ß-mercaptoethanol, and 2 mM L-Glu (6). On days 8 to 10 of culture, DCs were pulsed for 18 h with 10 µg/ml Propionibacterium acnes and 50 µg/ml schistosome egg antigen (SEA) with or without 10 µg/ml LLO₁₉₀ peptide. Following incubation with antigens, cells were washed in phosphate-buffered saline, and 5 x 10⁵ DCs were injected intraperitoneally into each mouse.

Ex vivo cytokine production analysis. Splenocytes were harvested and restimulated for 6 h at a concentration of 15 x 10⁶ cells/ml with or without 1 µg/ml LLO₁₉₀ in the presence of 50 U/ml human IL-2 (Peprotech) and Golgistop (Pharmingen) in Iscove's medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum or 5% normal mouse serum, 100 U/ml penicillin/streptomycin, 50 µM ß-mercaptoethanol, and 2 mM L-Glu. Cytokine production was determined by using a BD Cytofix/Cytoperm kit according to the manufacturer's protocol. Data were collected using a BD FACSCalibur and LSRII and were analyzed using FlowJo.

Ad construction and preparation. The Ad hu5 adenovirus (Ad) with E1 and E3 deleted was constructed to express green fluorescent protein (GFP) containing the LLO₁₉₀ and Ova₂₅₇ epitopes (Ad.LLO.Ova). Ad.LLO.Ova was prepared as described previously (3). pAD-TrackCMV containing LLO.Ova.GFP was cotransformed with pADEasy-1 into BJ5183 bacteria, and pADTrack/pADEasy recombinants were amplified and transfected into 293 cells. Virus was harvested by multiple rounds of freezing and thawing. A purified Ad construct was prepared by serial infection of 1 plate to 5 plates to 20 plates to 50 150-mm plates of cells. The purified Ad construct was purified by two rounds of buoyant density ultracentrifugation using CsCl, and the preparation was desalted using a desalting column. The genome titer was determined by determining the optical density at 260 using a spectrophotometer.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS AND DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
CD4 T-cell help influences the magnitude and quality of the CD8 T-cell response. In some systems, the primary CD8 T-cell responses primed in the absence of CD4 T-cell help are deficient relative to those primed in the presence of T-cell help (1, 4, 12). In other experimental systems, CD4 cells are not required for effective primary CD8 responses (7, 9). However, more profound and consistent deficiencies are observed in memory CD8 T-cell populations when they are generated in the absence of CD4 T-cell help (4, 7, 9, 10). During a primary immune response, CD4 and CD8 T cells expand and differentiate simultaneously, acquiring effector function 2 to 5 days following antigenic challenge, suggesting that the delivery of help by Th cells may be delayed. In contrast, memory CD4 T cells respond rapidly in response to antigenic challenge, potentially allowing the immediate delivery of help to CD8 T cells, which could influence early events in CD8 T-cell responses. Here we used a system in which we primed CD8 T-cell responses in the presence of T-cell help from preexisiting memory CD4 T cells. Specifically, mice primed with DCs pulsed with the MHC-II-restricted peptide LLO₁₉₀ (NEKYAQAYPNVS) from the listeriolysin O protein of L. monocytogenes, which generated an LLO₁₉₀-specific Th response, were subsequently challenged with rLMova (8). This experimental system allowed analysis of the primary CD8 T-cell response to Ova in a setting where the LLO₁₉₀-specific memory CD4 T-cell population was engaged.

Mice were immunized with DCs pulsed with LLO₁₉₀ plus heat-killed P. acnes (DC/P. acnes/LLO₁₉₀) to generate LLO₁₉₀-specific Th1 CD4 T cells (6). Seven days later, splenocytes were harvested, stimulated with the LLO₁₉₀ peptide, and stained for intracellular IFN-. In line with previous findings (6), DC/P. acnes/LLO₁₉₀-immunized mice generated Th1 responses as LLO₁₉₀-specific CD4 T cells produced IFN- and IL-2 but not IL-4 (Fig. 1A and data not shown).

View larger version (30K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 1. DC immunization generates peptide-specific Th1 effector cells in vivo. (A) Mice were immunized with DCs pulsed for 18 h with P. acnes with or without LLO190 peptide, as indicated. Seven days following immunization, splenocytes were harvested from immune mice and restimulated ex vivo for 6 h with medium or LLO190. IFN- production was determined by intracellular staining and FACS. A live splenocyte gate was used, and the numbers indicate the percentages of lymphocytes that were CD4+ and producing IFN-. The results are representative of three experiments in which there were three mice per group. (B to D) Mice were immunized with DCs pulsed with P. acnes with or without LLO190. More than 60 days following DC immunization, the mice were each challenged with 3 x 104 CFU of Listeria (rLMova). Seven days following infection, splenocytes were harvested from immune mice and restimulated ex vivo with LLO190. IFN- and IL-2 production was determined by intracellular staining and FACS. A live (B) or live/CD4+ (C) gate was used. (D) Bar graphs indicating the percentages and numbers of IFN--producing cells/spleen (three mice per group). Data from one of five experiments are shown. An asterisk indicates that the P value is <0.05 as determined by Student's t test. IMM, immunization; CHG, challenge; PA, P. acnes.

To determine whether DC immunization generates functional memory T cells, mice were immunized with DCs pulsed with P. acnes alone or with P. acnes and LLO₁₉₀ and >60 days later were challenged with rLMova. Seven days following challenge, splenocytes were harvested and stimulated with the LLO₁₉₀ peptide. Compared to mice immunized with DCs pulsed with P. acnes, mice which had been immunized with DC/P. acnes/LLO₁₉₀ exhibited a significantly enhanced Th1 response upon challenge with rLMova (Fig. 1B), demonstrating that DC immunization generates functional CD4 memory T cells, which are capable of responding to subsequent L. monocytogenes infection.

To examine the effects of engaging CD4 memory during the CD8 primary response, mice were first immunized with DCs pulsed with P. acnes or with DC/P. acnes/LLO₁₉₀ and then >60 days later challenged with rLMova. Seven days following challenge, splenocytes were harvested, the numbers of Ova₂₅₇-specific CD8 T cells were determined by tetramer staining, and IFN-- and IL-2-producing cells were identified by intracellular staining (7). We found that the size of the primary CD8 T-cell response, as assessed by each of these parameters, was significantly greater in mice with LLO₁₉₀-specific memory Th1 cells than in mice that had no CD4 memory for L. monocytogenes (Fig. 2). These data demonstrate that CD4 memory T cells enhance the primary CD8 T-cell response.

View larger version (42K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 2. CD4 memory T cells enhance the CD8 primary response. Mice were immunized with DCs pulsed with P. acnes with or without LLO190 and challenged 60 days later with rLMova. Splenocytes were analyzed for Ova antigen-specific cells by Kb/Ova tetramer staining. Cytokine production was determined as described in the legend to Fig. 1. (A) Cells gated on live CD8+ splenocytes. The numbers indicate the percentages of gated cells which are tetramer positive (top panels) or produce the cytokines indicated (bottom panels). (B) Percentages of CD8+ splenocytes which are Ova specific or produce IFN- or IFN- and IL-2. The results for three mice from one of three experiments are shown. An asterisk indicates that the P value is <0.05 as determined by Student's t test. IMM, immunization; CHG, challenge; PA, P. acnes.

Differentially activated DCs can induce either Th1 or Th2 effector differentiation. DCs pulsed with Toll-like receptor ligands promote differentiation of CD4 T cells to the Th1 lineage (5, 6). Conversely, DCs pulsed with helminth antigens, such as soluble SEA, promote the differentiation of CD4 T cells to the Th2 lineage (6). We took advantage of this system to determine whether the ability of CD4 memory T cells to help the CD8 primary responses was characteristic of CD4 T cells in general or specifically a quality of memory Th1 cells and not Th2 cells. Mice were immunized with DC/P. acnes/LLO₁₉₀, which generated LLO₁₉₀-specific memory Th1 cells, or DCs pulsed with LLO₁₉₀ plus SEA, which induced LLO₁₉₀-specific memory Th2 cells. After 60 days, mice were challenged with rLMova. Activating memory Th2 cells did not increase the primary CD8 T-cell response, suggesting that the ability to enhance primary CD8 T-cell responses is a specific property of Th1 memory cells (Fig. 3).

View larger version (43K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 3. Th2 memory CD4 T cells do not enhance the primary CD8 response. Mice were immunized with DCs pulsed with P. acnes with or without SEA and LLO190 and challenged 60 days later with rLMova. Splenocytes were analyzed for Ova antigen-specific cells by Kb/Ova tetramer staining. (A) Cells gated on live CD8+ splenocytes. The numbers indicate the percentages of gated cells which are tetramer positive. (B) Total number of Ova-specific CD8 T cells. The data are the data for three mice from one of three independent experiments. DC/PA/LLO values differed significantly (P < 0.05, Student's t test) from DC/PA or DC/SEA/LLO values. IMM, immunization; CHG, challenge; PA, P. acnes.

One impediment in vaccination research is the difficulty of eliciting the magnitude of response that is necessary to establish protection. For example, the immunogenicity of nonreplicating Ad can be compromised by preexisting immunity to Ad or the toxicity of high viral loads (11). To determine whether primary CD8 T-cell responses to Ad could be enhanced by existing memory CD4 T cells, mice immunized with DCs pulsed with P. acnes or with DC/P. acnes/LLO₁₉₀ >60 days previously were vaccinated with Ad.LLO.Ova. The number of Ova₂₅₇-specific CD8 T cells induced by Ad.LLO.Ova was increased approximately 3-fold when LLO₁₉₀-specific memory Th1 cells were present at the time of vaccination (Fig. 4A and B). To examine whether preexisting immunity elicited by infection might be utilized to enhance vaccine efficacy, mice were infected with L. monocytogenes and >60 days later were vaccinated with Ad.LLO.Ova. Similarly, when LLO₁₉₀-specific memory CD4 T cells were generated by L. monocytogenes infection, the primary Ova₂₅₇-specific CD8 T-cell responses were >5-fold greater than those in mice that had never been infected with L. monocytogenes (Fig. 4C). Importantly, in response to immunization with lower doses of Ad, the CD8 T-cell responses in the presence of preexisiting Th1 help were comparable to those elicited by a 10-fold-greater Ad titer, indicating that priming CD8 T cells in the presence of Th1 memory could significantly reduce the viral load required to generate productive CD8 T-cell responses (Fig. 4C and data not shown).

View larger version (38K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 4. CD8 T-cell responses to Ad immunization can be enhanced by activating endogenous memory CD4 T cells. (A and B) Mice were immunized with DCs pulsed with P. acnes with or without LLO190 and challenged 60 days later with recombinant Ad expressing a modified GFP which contained the Ova257 and LLO190 epitopes (Ad.LLO/Ova). Seven days following challenge, splenocytes were analyzed for Ova antigen-specific cells by Kb/Ova tetramer staining. (A) Cells gated on a live gate. The numbers indicate the percentages of CD8+ cells which are tetramer positive. (B) Total numbers of Ova-specific cells from three mice from one of two independent experiments. An asterisk indicates that the P value is <0.05 as determined by Student's t test. (C) Mice were infected with 3 x 104 CFU L. monocytogenes. More than 60 days later, mice were challenged with109 PFU of Ad.LLO.Ova. Seven days following challenge, splenocytes were analyzed for Ova antigen-specific cells by Kb/Ova tetramer staining. An asterisk indicates that the P value is <0.05 as determined by Student's t test. IMM, immunization; CHG, challenge; PA, P. acnes.

Lastly, we asked whether the enhanced primary CD8 T-cell response elicited in mice that have preexisting pathogen-specific Th1 cells could confer a protective advantage during challenge infection. Mice were immunized with DCs pulsed with P. acnes or with DC/P. acnes/LLO₁₉₀ or were infected with L. monocytogenes and >60 days later were challenged with L. monocytogenes. The bacterial numbers in the spleens of mice immunized with DC/P. acnes/LLO₁₉₀ were significantly lower than those in the spleens of mice that did not have preexisting Th1 memory (Fig. 5). As expected, mice preinfected with L. monocytogenes were completely protected against challenge infection.

View larger version (10K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 5. Enhanced CD8 T-cell responses are protective. Mice were immunized with DCs pulsed with P. acnes with or without LLO190 and challenged 60 days later with a 50% lethal dose of rLMova (1 x 105 CFU). Four days following challenge, spleens were harvested, and the numbers of bacteria in the spleens were determined by serial dilution. The double line indicates the limit of detection. Each data point represents the total number of CFU/spleen for one mouse (three mice per group). The data are representative of three independent experiments. The asterisk indicates that the P value is <0.05 as determined by Student's t test. n.d., not detected; IMM, immunization; PA, P. acnes.

CD4 T-cell responses are known to influence the magnitude and quality of CD8 T-cell responses. Here we show that engaging CD4 memory T cells at the time of naïve CD8 T-cell activation enhances the number of antigen-specific CD8 cells capable of producing IFN- and IL-2. Interestingly, Th1, but not Th2, memory cells are capable of providing this help to CD8 cells. Our data suggest that preexisting Th1 immunity resulting from vaccination or infection could be harnessed to enhance vaccine-induced CD8 T-cell immunity in an immunotherapy setting or against pathogens for which defined MHC-I-restricted, but not MHC-II-restricted, epitopes are available.

 
We thank J. Northrop, E. L. Pearce, J. DiSpirito, and A. Troy for critical comments. We thank B. Murphy, A. Bantly, and C. H. Pletcher of the Flow Cytometry and Cell Sorting Resource Laboratory for invaluable assistance.

This work was supported by grant NIH AI53825 to E.J.P. and by grant NIH AI45025 to H.S. E.J.P. is a Burroughs Wellcome Fund Scholar in Molecular Parasitology. C.M.K. is supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the International Human Frontier Science Program Organization.

 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address for Edward J. Pearce: Department of Pathobiology, Room 318 Hill Pavilion, School of Veterinary Medicine, 380 South University Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4539. Phone: (215) 573-3493. Fax: (215) 746-2295. E-mail: ejpearce{at}mail.med.upenn.edu. Mailing address for Hao Shen: Department of Medicine, Room 303C Johnson Pavilion, 3610 Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6076. Phone: (215) 573-5259. Fax: (215) 573-9068. E-mail: hshen{at}mail.med.upenn.edu

Published ahead of print on 16 April 2007.

Editor: J. L. Flynn

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS AND DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 

1
1. Bourgeois, C., B. Rocha, and C. Tanchot. 2002. A role for CD40 expression on CD8⁺ T cells in the generation of CD8⁺ T cell memory. Science 297:2060-2063.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2
2. Foulds, K. E., L. A. Zenewicz, D. J. Shedlock, J. Jiang, A. E. Troy, and H. Shen. 2002. Cutting edge: CD4 and CD8 T cells are intrinsically different in their proliferative responses. J. Immunol. 168:1528-1532.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3
3. He, T. C., S. Zhou, L. T. da Costa, J. Yu, K. W. Kinzler, and B. Vogelstein. 1998. A simplified system for generating recombinant adenoviruses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:2509-2514.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4
4. Janssen, E. M., E. E. Lemmens, T. Wolfe, U. Christen, M. G. von Herrath, and S. P. Schoenberger. 2003. CD4⁺ T cells are required for secondary expansion and memory in CD8⁺ T lymphocytes. Nature 421:852-856.[CrossRef][Medline]
5
5. Kapsenberg, M. L. 2003. Dendritic-cell control of pathogen-driven T-cell polarization. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 3:984-993.[CrossRef][Medline]
6
6. MacDonald, A. S., and E. J. Pearce. 2002. Cutting edge: polarized Th cell response induction by transferred antigen-pulsed dendritic cells is dependent on IL-4 or IL-12 production by recipient cells. J. Immunol. 168:3127-3130.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7
7. Shedlock, D. J., and H. Shen. 2003. Requirement for CD4 T cell help in generating functional CD8 T cell memory. Science 300:337-339.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8
8. Shen, H., J. F. Miller, X. Fan, D. Kolwyck, R. Ahmed, and J. T. Harty. 1998. Compartmentalization of bacterial antigens: differential effects on priming of CD8 T cells and protective immunity. Cell 92:535-545.[CrossRef][Medline]
9
9. Sun, J. C., and M. J. Bevan. 2003. Defective CD8 T cell memory following acute infection without CD4 T cell help. Science 300:339-342.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10
10. Sun, J. C., M. A. Williams, and M. J. Bevan. 2004. CD4⁺ T cells are required for the maintenance, not programming, of memory CD8⁺ T cells after acute infection. Nat. Immunol. 5:927-933.[CrossRef][Medline]
11
11. Tatsis, N., and H. C. Ertl. 2004. Adenoviruses as vaccine vectors. Mol. Ther. 10:616-629.[CrossRef][Medline]
12
12. Wang, J. C., and A. M. Livingstone. 2003. Cutting edge: CD4⁺ T cell help can be essential for primary CD8⁺ T cell responses in vivo. J. Immunol. 171:6339-6343.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

---

Infection and Immunity, July 2007, p. 3556-3560, Vol. 75, No. 7
0019-9567/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/IAI.00086-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Krawczyk, C. M. Articles by Pearce, E. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Krawczyk, C. M. Articles by Pearce, E. J.