Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, September 2007, p. 4373-4385, Vol. 75, No. 9
0019-9567/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/IAI.00497-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
,
Division of Biological Sciences, The University of Montana, Missoula, Montana 59812
Received 6 April 2007/ Accepted 8 June 2007
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Living between the clothing and skin, body lice normally take several blood meals per day and acquire B. quintana by imbibing the blood of a bacteremic human (12). To generate disease, B. quintana must survive and proliferate throughout the human-louse-human cycle and must respond to the disparate environments of the human and body louse. An environmental change of particular interest is the concentration of heme, which is used as a prosthetic subunit in a large number of proteins and consists of an iron atom contained in the center of porphyrin. (The Fe3+ oxidation product of heme is called hemin.) Free heme is quite rare in humans (5), whereas potentially toxic levels are generated in the louse gut during blood meals (26, 49, 65), which can occur several times daily (12). B. quintana has the greatest known bacterial requirement for exogenous heme (42, 43, 67), and it is generally accepted that this extraordinary supplement is needed by all members of the Bartonellaceae, because erythrocytes, hemoglobin, or hemin (20 to 40 µg/ml of medium) is essential for in vitro cultivation (8). Since combinations of iron and porphyrin cannot substitute for heme in cultivation, researchers have hypothesized that high levels are necessary for one or more of the following: a source of iron (14, 59) or porphyrin (43), a hydrogen peroxide-detoxifying agent (42), or a means to establish a microaerobic intracellular environment (7) (as leghemoglobin functions for nitrogen-fixing rhizobia [2]). Considering the fluctuations in heme levels throughout the human-louse-human cycle and the extraordinary concentration required, it is obvious that heme acquisition mechanisms are essential for the replication and ultimately the pathogenesis of B. quintana.
Previously, we discovered a family of hemin-binding proteins (HbpA to HbpE) synthesized by B. quintana that serve as outer membrane hemin receptors yet share no similarity to known bacterial heme binding proteins (14, 41). Hbp orthologues are found throughout the Rhizobiales. In fact, the Brucella outer membrane protein (omp) family (16, 58, 68) has become a major focus of vaccine development (10, 22, 27), and recently it was demonstrated that Omp31 is also a hemin-binding protein (17). The obvious similarity between the Bartonella hbp family and the Brucella omp family was the impetus for the inclusion of batR transcript analysis in the present study (see below), since BvrR (the Brucella orthologue) has been implicated in the regulation of Brucella abortus Omp25 synthesis (23, 61). Orthologues of Hbp's are termed Rop's in the rhizobia and have been identified and partially characterized (18, 54, 55). Finally, the prediction of a beta-barrel porin-like structure for Hbp's (as well as its orthologues) suggests that Hbp's may function to bind heme and subsequently transport some portion of it (15, 73).
Recently (7), we showed that environmental signals that simulate oxygen, heme, and temperature conditions encountered by B. quintana in the human bloodstream (37°C, 5% O2, low hemin) and the insect vector (30°C, high hemin) significantly influence the expression of the hbp family in a coordinated and differential manner. These environmental stimuli generated transcript profiles that were either "louse-like" (relatively high for hbpC and hbpB [subgroup I] and low for hbpA, hbpD, and hbpE) or "bloodstream-like" (relatively high for hbpA, hbpD, and hbpE [subgroup II] and apparently repressed for hbpC and hbpB). The most dramatic change in the transcript profile of the hbp family occurred in response to a "louse-like" temperature of 30°C (34, 39), where a >100-fold increase in the hbpC mRNA transcript level was demonstrated relative to the level at the human bloodstream temperature (37°C). We proposed that subgroup I (HbpC and, to a lesser extent, HbpB) is preferentially synthesized in the louse and that subgroup II proteins (HbpA, HbpD, and HbpE) are employed for heme acquisition in humans. Accordingly, it was recently shown that HbpE is a dominant immunoreactive surface antigen in humans infected with B. quintana (9). Finally, we demonstrated the existence of a cis-acting regulatory element located in the hbpA promoter region (7). The goal of the present study was to elucidate the coordinated and differential regulation of the hbp family, with a focus on identification of a transcriptional regulator responsible for the apparent repression of hbpC observed at 37°C compared to 30°C (>100-fold increase).
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Bacterial strains and plasmids
|
, and M15(pREP4), employed in cloning experiments, were cultivated using Luria-Bertani medium with standard concentrations of antibiotic supplements (4) when required. Nucleic acid isolation, purification, and manipulation. The plasmids used in this study are described in Table 1. For primers, see Table S1 in the supplemental material. Standard restriction endonucleases, PCR, and cloning procedures were employed for the construction of plasmids (4). The Perfectprep Plasmid Mini kit (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) and the QIAquick spin kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA) were used for plasmid isolation and DNA purification, respectively, during routine cloning procedures. Plasmids employed in electroporation were prepared using the Wizard Midiprep kit (Promega, Madison, WI). Bartonella genomic DNA was prepared with the DNeasy tissue kit (QIAGEN) for the PCR template. Primers for PCR and sequence analysis were synthesized by Sigma-Genosys (The Woodlands, TX). Nucleic acids were quantified by using a Spectronic Genesys 2 spectrophotometer (Milton Roy, Rochester, NY).
B. quintana mRNA used for quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) and transcriptional start site (TSS) mapping was prepared using the RiboPure-Bacteria kit with Turbo DNase I treatment (Ambion, Austin, TX) and a FastPrep bead homogenizer (Qbiogene, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturers' instructions. The primers and probes used for qRT-PCR analysis of the hbp family have been described previously (41). The irr, rirA, and fur primer-probe sets, as well as the batR primer set, used for qRT-PCR analysis were designed with Beacon Designer, version 4.0 (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) and are listed in Table S1 in the supplemental material. Dual-labeled irr, rirA, and fur probes were synthesized with fluorescent tags as described for the hbp family (41); 5-carboxyfluorescein and N,N',N'-tetramethyl-6-carboxyrhodamine were covalently linked to the 5' and 3' ends, respectively (Sigma-Genosys). The irr, rirA, fur, and batR primer pairs were synthesized by Applied Biosystems (ABI; Foster City, CA).
qRT-PCR. qRT-PCR using RNAs derived from bacteria subjected to altered growth environments (hemin, O2, or temperature) or from genetically modified bacteria (containing multiple copies of a specific transcription factor) was used to calculate the "fold difference," defined as the amount of a specific target mRNA normalized to an endogenous reference and relative to a calibrator. For example, the amount of a specific transcriptional regulator (irr, rirA, fur, or batR) mRNA in 30°C preparations (target) was normalized to the amount of 16S rRNA (endogenous reference) and is relative to the quantity of that particular transcriptional regulator mRNA in the 37°C preparations (calibrator). Specifically, hbp, irr, rirA, and fur qRT-PCR results were obtained using One-Step RT-PCR Master Mix, MultiScribe, and RNase inhibitor reagents (ABI) with the MyiQ Real-Time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad) and Optical System software, version 1.0 (Bio-Rad), as previously described (7). Each reaction mixture included 0.7 ng template RNA, 67 ng probe, and 167 ng of each primer in a 25-µl volume and a 96-well format. Cycling parameters were 50°C for 30 min, 95°C for 10 min, and then 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 60 s. Fold differences in transcript levels were calculated by using the comparative cycle threshold method (3, 33). Because our laboratory is transitioning to the use of more cost-effective RT-PCR reagents, batR qRT-PCR results were obtained by using the iScript One-Step RT-PCR kit with SYBR green (Bio-Rad) per the manufacturer's instructions. Protocols and equipment were the same as those described above, except that the reaction conditions were 50°C for 10 min, 95°C for 5 min, and then 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 30 s. Three independent determinations of fold differences were used to calculate the average fold difference values and associated standard deviations reported here.
Construction of irr, fur, and rirA overexpression plasmids. Primers were designed to generate irr, fur, and rirA PCR amplicons from B. quintana that contained the open reading frame (ORF) as well as flanking sequence. (i) The irr amplicon is 782 bp with 181 bp upstream and 99 bp downstream of the ORF; (ii) the fur amplicon is 533 bp with 82 bp of upstream and 53 bp of downstream flanking sequence; and (iii) the rirA amplicon is 740 bp with 185 bp of upstream sequence and 107 bp downstream of the ORF (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). Amplicons were cloned into pCR2.1TOPO, resulting in pCR2.1TOPO-IRR, pCR2.1TOPO-FUR, and pCR2.1TOPO-RIRA. Each target ORF and specified flanking sequence was cloned into pBBR1MCS. (i) The KpnI/XbaI fragment from pCR2.1TOPO-IRR was cloned into KpnI/XbaI-digested pBBR1MCS, resulting in pBBR-IRR; (ii) the XbaI/HindIII fragment from pCR2.1TOPO-FUR was cloned into XbaI/HindIII-digested pBBR1MCS, resulting in pBBR-FUR; and (iii) the KpnI/XbaI fragment from pCR2.1TOPO-RIRA was cloned into KpnI/XbaI-digested pBBR1MCS, resulting in pBBR-RIRA. Plasmid contents were verified by sequence analysis.
Transformation of B. quintana.
pBBR1MCS overexpression constructs were introduced into B. quintana by electroporation as previously described (6, 7). Briefly, strain JK31 (in vitro passages 5 to 8) was harvested into heart infusion broth, washed in 10% glycerol, and diluted to 3 x 1010 cells/ml with 10% glycerol. A 44-µl volume of bacteria was combined with 5 µl of plasmid DNA (
3 µg/µl) in a 2-mm-gap electroporation cuvette (BTX, Holliston, MA) and pulsed with a GenePulser (Bio-Rad) at 2.5 kV, 25 µF, and 400
. Several chloramphenicol-resistant clones were further examined and verified as stable transformants by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of plasmid preparations.
Cloning, expression, and purification of rIrr. Primers were designed (see Table S1 in the supplemental material) to generate a 500-bp amplicon that contained the irr ORF, which was subsequently cloned into pCR2.1TOPO. The HindIII/PstI fragment from this plasmid was then cloned into compatible sites of pQE30, resulting in pQE30-IRR. Following transformation of E. coli M15(pRep4), induction and purification of His6-tagged recombinant Irr (rIrr) (under native conditions) were accomplished using the manufacturer's protocols (QIAGEN).
EMSA analysis. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) analysis was accomplished with the LightShift chemiluminescent EMSA kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Initially, four overlapping PCR products specific to the hbpC promoter region were generated with primer pairs listed in Table S1 in the supplemental material and B. quintana JK31 genomic DNA. Amplicons were then biotinylated with the biotin 3' end DNA labeling kit (Pierce) according to the manufacturer's instructions, and these biotinylated amplicons are referred to as "probes" below. EMSA reaction mixtures were prepared as follows: 10x binding buffer (2 µl), 50% glycerol (1 µl), 1-µg/µl poly(dI-dC) (1 µl), 1% NP-40 (1 µl), and 40 fmol of a biotin-labeled probe. rIrr alone (1.4 µM) or in combination with an unlabeled probe (8 pmol) was added, and the final volume was brought to 20 µl with distilled H2O. Following a 20-min incubation at room temperature, reaction mixtures were loaded onto a 5% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel and electrophoretically separated at 4°C using 0.5% Tris-borate-EDTA buffer. The biotinylated probes were then transferred at 4°C to Immobilon-NY+ membranes (Millipore, Bedford, MA) by using 0.5% Tris-borate-EDTA and a Mini Trans-Blot cell (Bio-Rad) and were cross-linked by a 15-min exposure on a UV transilluminator. Finally, biotinylated probes were visualized using a chemiluminescent nucleic acid detection module (Pierce) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Determination of TSSs of hbp genes and irr.
TSSs were analyzed using primer extension (PE) and random amplification of cDNA ends (RACE). Total RNA for TSS mapping was isolated from B. quintana (96-h cultures) with a Ribopure-Bacteria kit according to the manufacturer's instructions (Ambion). To analyze TSSs by PE, HBP-PE primers (see Table S1 in the supplemental material) (10 pmol) were end labeled using [
-32P]ATP (New England Nuclear, Boston, MA) and T4 polynucleotide kinase as instructed by the supplier (Promega). Labeled primers were annealed to 100 µg RNA in hybridization buffer [40 mM piperazine-N,N'-bis(2-ethanesulfonic acid) (PIPES; pH 6.4), 1 mM EDTA, 0.4 M NaCl, 80% formamide] for 16 h at 50°C. The resulting hybrid was precipitated with 95% ethanol and the pellet dried in vacuo. PE was carried out using Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase and a supplied buffer containing deoxynucleoside triphosphates and RNasin according to the manufacturer's instructions (Promega). Extension products were loaded onto a sequencing gel adjacent to DNA sequencing reactions generated with a Sequenase 2.0 kit (U.S. Biochemicals, Cleveland, OH) using the same TSS primer, a plasmid DNA template containing the respective hbp gene plus flanking sequences cloned into pBluescript SK (41), and
-35S-labeled dATP (New England Nuclear). To analyze TSSs by RACE, the 5' RACE system (Invitrogen-Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) was used according to the manufacturer's instructions along with GSP1 and GSP2 primers specific to each target (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). cDNAs of each target transcript were synthesized using a GSP1 primer and Superscript II reverse transcriptase. Following addition of a 3' dC tail to the cDNA, a nested GSP2 primer and the 5' Abridged Anchor Primer were used to PCR amplify the target cDNA. The amplicons were cloned into pCR2.1TOPO, and plasmid preparations of E. coli TOP10 transformants were sequenced in both strands.
Nucleotide sequencing and analysis. DNA was sequenced with an automated DNA sequencer (ABI 3130x1) and a BigDye Terminator cycle sequencing ready reaction kit (ABI). Sequence analysis was accomplished with MacVector software, version 9.0 (Accelrys, San Diego, CA). Genomic DNA sequences of B. quintana strain Toulouse (NC_005955), Bartonella henselae strain Houston-1 (NC_005956) (1), and Bartonella bacilliformis strain KC583 (NC_008783) were obtained from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov).
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (14K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Environmental stimuli generate parallels within transcriptional regulator mRNAs. Shown are average fold differences in the mRNA quantities of transcriptional regulators irr, fur, rirA, and batR, relative to the quantities from the control environment (21% O2, 37°C, 0.15 mM hemin), following growth under conditions that simulate the oxygen, temperature, and heme conditions of the host and vector. At 96 h, the amount of transcription factor mRNA from each environment (5% O2, 30°C, low or high hemin) was normalized to the amount of 16S rRNA. Error bars represent standard deviations from three independent triplicate determinations. ND, not detectable, i.e., the average cycle threshold value is statistically indistinguishable from that for the no-template control.
|
![]() View larger version (24K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. qRT-PCR analysis of a hyper-Irr strain at 37°C and 30°C. Shown are average fold differences observed at 37°C (A) and 30°C (B) between the mRNA quantities of hbp genes and transcription factors irr, fur, rirA, and batR from a hyper-Irr strain (JK31+pBBR-IRR) and those from a control strain (JK31+pBBR). At 96 h, the amount of target mRNA from JK31+pBBR-IRR was normalized to the amount of 16S rRNA. Error bars represent standard deviations from three independent triplicate determinations. The asterisk indicates that the error bar is not drawn to scale.
|
Average fold differences were calculated for hbpA to hbpE, irr, fur, rirA, and batR from RNA preparations of JK31+pBBR-IRR (target) and JK31+pBBR (calibrator) cultivated in a control environment (HIB, 37°C, 21% O2). The results of this experiment are shown in Fig. 2A. Multiple copies of irr and flanking sequence generate interesting profiles for both the hbp family and the transcriptional regulators. First, it is obvious that the presence of multiple copies of irr (with an endogenous promoter) leads to a marked increase (>380-fold) in the quantity of irr mRNA and is likely a result of the copy number of pBBR1MCS. A commensurate difference in the level of Irr protein between these two strains was confirmed by immunoblot analysis using rabbit anti-Irr antiserum (data not shown), showing that JK31+pBBR-IRR is, in effect, an Irr-hyperexpressing (hyper-Irr) strain. Second, we previously hypothesized that expression of subgroup I (hbpC and hbpB) was "louse specific," because these transcripts predominated following "louse-like" stimuli (30°C, high hemin), and that subgroup II expression was "human specific," because "bloodstream-like" stimuli (37°C, low hemin) resulted in significant increases in hbpA, hbpD, and hbpE levels (7). The subgroup I repression exhibited by the hyper-Irr strain, combined with the substantial increase in subgroup II expression, is analogous to a "bloodstream-like" hbp family transcript profile under normal growth conditions (Fig. 2A). Collectively, these data suggest that Irr plays a role in regulating the hbp family. Lastly, levels of rirA transcripts exhibit the largest overall fold change among the remaining transcriptional regulators, followed by fur and batR in this strain.
Since the hyper-Irr strain exhibits a "human-specific" hbp family transcript profile in a control environment, we set out to learn more about the relationship between Irr and hbp expression by studying the effects of a "louse-like" stimulus on JK31+pBBR-IRR. The response of wild-type B. quintana JK31 to a "louse-like" temperature was a dramatic (>100-fold) increase in hbpC transcript levels (7) and a >5-fold decrease in irr levels, as demonstrated here (Fig. 1). These changes constitute the largest overall fold difference seen for any hbp and for all transcriptional regulators tested. Therefore, if Irr is involved in hbpC repression, we would best observe this event at 30°C. Average fold differences were calculated for hbpA to hbpE, irr, fur, rirA, and batR from RNA preparations of JK31+pBBR-IRR grown at a "louse-like" temperature (HIB, 30°C, 21% O2) (target) compared to the control environment (HIB, 37°C, 21% O2) (calibrator) and are shown in Fig. 2B. First, the insignificant change in the irr transcript quantity (1.33) implies that the hyper-Irr phenotype is maintained at 30°C. Second, in comparison to the >100-fold increase in hbpC levels observed for wild-type B. quintana at 30°C (7), the hyper-Irr strain generates only a small increase in hbpC transcript levels at 30°C (Fig. 2B), yet it is not fully repressed, as demonstrated at 37°C (Fig. 2A). These data show that Irr and temperature have significant and inversely related effects on hbpC transcription; hbpC expression is seemingly repressed by Irr and is greatly enhanced at 30°C. Third, the hyper-Irr strain exhibits a noteworthy reduction in hbpA, hbpD, and hbpE transcript quantities at a "louse-like" temperature (Fig. 2B) compared to growth at 37°C (Fig. 2A) or wild-type expression at 30°C (7). This suggests that expression of hbp subgroup II is also influenced by temperature and Irr; hbpA, hbpD, and hbpE are up-regulated in the presence of Irr and are repressed at 30°C. Taken together, it appears as if the hyper-Irr strain augments the effect of the temperature stimulus on hbp expression. Last, although changes observed in the remaining transcriptional regulators are not as extreme, two points are worth mentioning: (i) neither rirA nor fur transcripts were detectable in wild-type B. quintana at 30°C (Fig. 1), yet these transcripts are relatively abundant in the hyper-Irr strain at both temperatures (Fig. 2), implying that Irr plays a role in their expression; and (ii) batR transcript levels have thus far been observed to increase only at a "louse-like" temperature, and as with the hbp genes, the hyper-Irr strain appears to augment the 30°C response (Fig. 2B) compared to that for the wild type (Fig. 1).
EMSA demonstrates binding of rIrr to the hbpC promoter.
The qRT-PCR data presented thus far suggest a role for Irr in (i) the differential regulation of the hbp family, (ii) the regulation of fur, rirA, and batR, and (iii) the differential response to temperature. We therefore focused on the strongest correlation revealed in these qRT-PCR results by further investigating the role of Irr in hbpC repression. Specifically, we wanted to determine if this repressive effect was the direct result of Irr activity at the hbpC promoter. Thus, four primer pairs (P1, P2, P3, and P4 [see Table S1 in the supplemental material]) were used to generate four overlapping PCR fragments (
200 bp) from the promoter region of B. quintana JK31 hbpC. Following biotinylation, these overlapping probes (p1 to p4) (Fig. 3A) were used in EMSA reactions to determine if the presence of rIrr retarded their electrophoretic migration on a polyacrylamide gel (indicating that rIrr is binding to that particular probe).
![]() View larger version (45K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. rIrr EMSA of the hbpC promoter region. (A) Diagram of the hbpC promoter and relevant characteristics. The locations of biotin-labeled probes (p1, p2, p3, p4) used for EMSA are indicated, as are the relative locations of the H-box, the hbpC TSS, and the EcoRV restriction site that eliminates the rIrr-specific shift. Tick marks are placed every 100 bp. (B) Comparison of the mobilities of the four hbpC promoter probes (40 fmol) alone (lanes x), in the presence of 1.4 µM rIrr (lanes y), and combined with 1.4 µM rIrr and 8 pmol of an unlabeled probe (lanes z). Solid arrowheads indicate shifted probes; open arrowheads indicate the normal migratory position.
|
To further address the specificity and location of rIrr binding within the hbpC promoter, we focused on probe 4 and used two common variations of EMSA described above. The results of these experiments are shown in Fig. 4. First, additional evidence regarding specificity was achieved by adding increasing amounts of rIrr to 40 fmol biotin-labeled probe 4. Compared to the biotin-labeled probe alone (Fig. 4A, lane 1), the intensity of the mobility shift is increasingly enhanced upon incremental addition of rIrr, demonstrating a specific interaction between probe 4 and rIrr. Second, we further defined the location of the rIrr cis-acting element by EMSA analysis with EcoRV-digested probe 4. Specifically, the PCR fragment generated from primer pair P4 was restricted with EcoRV prior to purification and biotinylation. These probe 4 derivatives are of nearly equal size and comigrate during electrophoresis (Fig. 4B, lanes 3 and 4). Compared to the obvious mobility shift of probe 4 in the presence of rIrr (Fig. 4B, lane 2), neither of the EcoRV probe 4 fragments demonstrates a shift in the presence of rIrr (Fig. 4B, lane 4). This strongly suggests that the rIrr-specific cis-acting promoter element has been disrupted and that the motif is located in close proximity to the EcoRV site (Fig. 3A and 5).
![]() View larger version (70K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. EMSA of hbpC probe 4 demonstrates the specificity and location of the rIrr cis-acting element. (A) An increase in the intensity of the EMSA shift of hbpC probe 4 (40 fmol) (lane 1) is apparent upon addition of increasing amounts of rIrr—1.4 µM (lane 2), 2.0 µM (lane 3), and 3.0 µM (lane 4)—demonstrating the specificity of binding. (B) Comparison of the mobility of hbpC probe 4 (lanes 1 and 2) to the mobility of the two nearly equal sized EcoRV fragments of probe 4 (lanes 3 and 4). A mobility shift is apparent when 40 fmol of probe 4 alone (lane 1) is combined with 1.4 µM rIrr (lane 2), yet neither of the probe 4 EcoRV fragments (lane 3) demonstrates a shift when combined with 1.4 µM rIrr (lane 4), indicating that the rIrr cis-acting element is in close proximity to the EcoRV site. Solid arrowheads mark shifted probe 4, and open arrowheads point to the normal migratory position of probe 4, or probe 4 fragments (double open arrowhead). The asterisk indicates residual undigested probe 4, which is present in equal amounts in lanes 3 and 4, and not a mobility shift.
|
![]() View larger version (59K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Analysis of the B. quintana hbp family promoter. The hbpC promoter region from the 5'-most end of the probe 3-probe 4 overlap to the start codon of the hbpC ORF is shown aligned by ClustalW with the B. quintana hbpA, hbpB, hbpD, and hbpE promoter sequences (180 bp 5' of the ATG start codon). The EcoRV site and the putative B. quintana Irr cis-acting element (H-box) are indicated. The TSSs of three hbp genes were mapped by PE (circles) or RACE (diamonds) and are located 32 bp from the H-box.
|
40-bp consensus sequence that is common to all hbp genes. For clarification, hbpD and hbpE sequences were not found in B. bacilliformis and thus were not included in Fig. 6. Third, we determined that a distance of
32 bp separates the H-boxes and TSSs of the three hbp genes mapped thus far (Fig. 5), suggesting that the transcriptional initiation complex is assembled in close proximity to the Irr binding site. Repeated attempts to map the hbpB and hbpE TSSs by both PE and RACE were unsuccessful. Finally, the TSS of B. quintana irr was mapped by RACE at two locations in the irr promoter (T-N89-ATG and T-N39-ATG), and an H-box sequence (with four mismatches) was found nearby (N119-ATG), a 29-bp separation from the most distal TSS, suggesting that Irr may interact with its own promoter. Collectively, these data demonstrate a correlation between the H-box and B. quintana Irr that could possibly explain hbp regulation.
![]() View larger version (40K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Alignment of Bartonella hbp family promoter regions. ClustalW alignment of all hbp promoter region sequences (180 bp 5' of the ATG start codon) from B. quintana (B.q.), B. henselae (B.h.), and B. bacilliformis (B.b.) demonstrates that the H-box is a highly conserved region of a larger ( 40-bp) consensus shown here. Distances to the ATG codon are indicated. Note that sequences coding for hbpD and hbpE are absent in the B. bacilliformis genome.
|
![]() View larger version (35K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Other B. quintana promoters contain the H-box. A search for the H-box sequence (5'-TTTTTACTACAGAT) in the B. quintana genome with a tolerance of 3 mismatches, within 150 bp of the predicted start codon of the indicated ORF and in the same orientation with respect to the ORF as that of the H-box relative to the hbp genes, identifies 26 H-box sequences. The four hbp genes are each marked with a diamond. The H-box also occurs in five of six members of the cohemolysin autotransporter family (solid circles), heme O synthase, and several potential virulence factors. Distance to the predicted start codon (-n-ATG), gene name, and a brief description are provided. The brace indicates two H-box sequences found in the bq10400 promoter.
|
First, average fold differences were calculated for hbpA to hbpE, irr, fur, rirA, and batR from RNA preparations of JK31+pBBR-FUR (target) and strain JK31+pBBR (calibrator) cultivated in a control environment (HIB, 37°C, 21% O2). The results of this experiment are shown in Fig. 8A. Although the increase is far less than that observed for pBBR+JK31-IRR, the presence of multiple copies of fur and flanking sequence results in a significant increase in fur transcript levels. A corresponding difference in Fur protein levels between these two strains was confirmed by immunoblotting using rabbit anti-Fur antiserum (data not shown). However, changes in the quantities of all other target mRNAs were unremarkable except for hbpC, where a noteworthy decrease was observed. We are downplaying the role of Fur in the regulation of B. quintana hbp genes for a number of reasons: (i) no parallels between hbp family expression and fur are apparent; (ii) environmental stimuli did not significantly alter the low-level transcription of fur throughout this study, with the exception of the "louse-like" temperature, where no fur transcript was detected (Fig. 1); and (iii) as discussed below, a disparity exists within the Rhizobiales regarding a role for Fur when RirA is present (28, 56).
![]() View larger version (24K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. qRT-PCR analysis of B. quintana Fur and RirA overexpression. (A) Average fold differences observed in the mRNA quantities of the hbp genes and irr, fur, rirA, and batR from the Fur overexpression strain (JK31+pBBR-FUR) compared to those for a control strain (JK31+pBBR). At 96 h, the amount of target mRNA from JK31+pBBR-FUR was normalized to the amount of 16S rRNA. Error bars represent standard deviations from three independent triplicate determinations. (B) Average fold differences observed in the RNA quantities of hbp genes and irr, fur, rirA, and batR from the rirA overexpression strain (JK31+pBBR-RIRA) compared to those for the control strain (JK31+pBBR). At 96, h the amount of target mRNA from JK31+pBBR-RIRA was normalized to the amount of 16S rRNA. Error bars represent standard deviations from three independent triplicate determinations.
|
|
|
|---|
Niches occupied by bacteria are predicated on their ability to adapt to a specific environment, survive, and replicate. Bartonella requires a mammalian host and is typically transmitted by hematophagous insects, whereas Rhizobium and Bradyrhizobium form a symbiotic relationship with their legume host plant by fixing atmospheric nitrogen in root nodules. For nitrogen fixation to occur, a microaerobic environment must be established for the bacteria. This is accomplished by the binding of plant-generated leghemoglobin (a molecule similar to hemoglobin, the major source of heme for Bartonella) to the rhizobial surface, effectively shielding the bacteria, and O2-labile nitrogenase, from oxygen (2, 46). Interestingly, the heme prosthetic group of leghemoglobin is produced by rhizobia (47), whereas in silico analysis of available bartonellae suggests that they are incapable of de novo heme synthesis, since genes for nearly all porphyrin biosynthetic enzymes are absent (7). In addition, it has been shown that a number of Rhizobium and Bradyrhizobium species can use bovine hemoglobin as an iron source, a feature thought to be restricted to animal pathogens (45), and a heme uptake system was subsequently described for Bradyrhizobium japonicum (44). To our knowledge, the capacity of Bartonella to utilize leghemoglobin in place of hemoglobin, or how the presence of these molecules influences respiration, has not been studied. The majority of studies regarding the regulation of iron- and/or heme-related genes in the Rhizobiales have focused on B. japonicum and Rhizobium leguminosarum and thus provided a basis for the selection of candidate transcription factors in this study (for recent reviews, see references 28 and 56). To our knowledge, the transcriptional regulation of these candidate transcription factors or Hbp orthologues has not been studied directly in conjunction with temperature and oxygen stimuli, and thus, further discussion is speculative. Furthermore, since B. quintana requires heme for growth, it appears impossible to differentiate a low-iron environment from a low-heme environment. If it is assumed that high-heme conditions are equivalent to high-iron conditions (and low-heme to low-iron conditions), parallel regulatory patterns are evident for B. quintana Irr, Fur, and RirA throughout the Rhizobiales.
Irr, the iron response regulator, was first identified in B. japonicum (24), where aberrant protoporphyrin accumulation (under iron-limited conditions) was attributed to an irr mutation and concurrent derepression of hemB (encoding the heme biosynthetic enzyme
-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase), and is a member of the Fur (ferric uptake regulator) superfamily. Since this initial description, a number of reports have demonstrated that Irr is involved in the regulation of iron- and heme-associated genes in B. japonicum (44, 52, 57, 71), R. leguminosarum (63, 69), and B. abortus (35, 36). The general consensus of these studies is that (i) Irr activity is highest under iron limitation, (ii) Irr can function as a transcriptional repressor as well as an activator, (iii) heme itself can degrade Irr (51), and oxidative stress promotes degradation (70). Accordingly, we provide evidence that (i) irr transcript quantity is significantly increased under low-hemin (0.05 mM) conditions and is reduced under high-hemin (2.5 mM) conditions (Fig. 1); (ii) Irr can function as both a negative (hbpC) and a positive (hbpA, hbpD, hbpE) regulator (Fig. 2); and (iii) Irr has an effect on the expression of other transcriptional regulators (Fig. 2A). Finally, the hyper-Irr strain generated an augmented "bloodstream-like" hbp transcript profile (Fig. 2A). Further study is required to determine if one of these other transcription factors is, along with temperature, participating in hbp expression. Irr is considered to be restricted to the Rhizobiales, and this is the first analysis of irr in Bartonella.
A cis-acting regulatory sequence associated with Irr function has been proposed for B. japonicum (44, 53, 57). First, it is worth mentioning that the original description of Irr was based on regulation of B. japonicum hemA and hemB components of the heme biosynthetic pathway (24). Since Bartonella lacks these genes (and a mechanism for heme biosynthesis), we could not perform a direct comparison. Second, the initial "A/T-rich imperfect inverted repeat" description of the Irr cis-acting element was established by studying the divergently transcribed hmuR and hmuT genes, encoding a putative heme receptor and a periplasmic heme binding protein, respectively, in B. japonicum (44). Although B. quintana does contain orthologous sequences (hutA and hutB), the ORFs are not divergently transcribed, making direct comparison impossible. The
40-bp consensus derived from all hbp genes (Fig. 6) is similar to this initial description (44) in that it is A/T rich, yet if a repeat exists, it would appear to be direct. Third, a less stringent Irr-associated iron control element (ICE) consensus (5'-TTTA-N9-TAAA) (57) is found 266 times in the B. quintana genome, and the closest site is >1,500 bp away from the probe 3-4 overlap region (Fig. 3). Fourth, the most recently published consensus of the B. japonicum ICE (5'-TTTRGAAYNRTTCYAAA) (53) is not found in the probe 3-4 overlap region (with a tolerance of 3 mismatches), and the closest ClustalW alignment of ICE to the hbpC probe 3-4 overlap is 74 bp upstream of the EcoRV site, with 8 mismatches. Using this 8-mismatch tolerance to search the B. quintana genome results in 431,602 ICE sites (approximately 1 site every 3 bp). We hypothesize that either the B. quintana Irr cis-acting promoter element is distinct from that described for B. japonicum or the footprint size and exact nucleotide contacts therein preclude a precise consensus.
RirA, the rhizobial iron regulator, was first identified in R. leguminosarum (64), where derepression of iron- or heme-associated operons was ascribed to a rirA mutation. Further studies describe the global effect of this regulator (62, 66, 72) and show that RirA activity is highest under iron-replete conditions. A hypothetical regulatory network was proposed (63) where Irr and RirA sense the physiological consequences of extraneous iron rather than the concentration of iron, i.e., RirA is active under high-iron conditions, and Irr is active under low-iron conditions. Indeed, models of interplay between Irr, RirA, and Fur regulons have been proposed (28, 56). One noteworthy distinction is the role of Fur, depending on whether RirA is present in a particular species. In the absence of RirA (as is evident for B. japonicum), Fur assumes a more dominant regulatory role. Alternatively, RirA assumes the dominant iron-responsive role if present, and the function of fur is then downplayed (as is evident for R. leguminosarum). This dichotomy, although relatively unstudied, appears to exist in Bartonella: ORFs encoding all three of these transcription factors (Irr, Fur, and RirA) occur in B. quintana and B. henselae, yet B. bacilliformis does not appear to have a rirA gene. In accordance with these data, we demonstrate that (i) under low-hemin conditions, rirA transcript levels are decreased, and at high heme concentrations, an increase is apparent (Fig. 2A); (ii) rirA overexpression results in a significant increase in irr and fur transcript quantities, suggesting that RirA can influence the expression of these transcription factors (and in fact this is where we observed the largest average fold difference in fur transcript levels [Fig. 8B]); and (iii) fur overexpression had almost no impact on irr and rirA transcript quantities and had the least effect on the hbp transcript profile. Finally, this is the first analysis of rirA in the bartonellae, and a rirA overexpression strain generated a "bloodstream-like" hbp transcript profile. It is tempting to speculate that due to the presence of rirA, iron regulation in B. quintana and B. henselae (50) is like that in R. leguminosarum, whereas the regulation strategy of B. bacilliformis is predicted to be more akin to that of B. japonicum.
cis-acting regulatory elements related to the functions of Fur and RirA in the Rhizobiales have been described (21, 53, 72), but to our knowledge, such elements have not been described for any orthologue of batR. First, footprint analysis of the B. japonicum irr promoter demonstrates that B. japonicum Fur protects a 29-bp region (5'-AGTTGCGAGAAACTTGCATCTGCATCAT) from DNase I digestion (21). A search of the B. quintana genome, with a tolerance of 12, detected this sequence at 573 locations. The closest location to the B. quintana irr ORF is >1,600 bp upstream, and the nearest proximity to fur, rirA, batR, or an hbp is located within the hbpB ORF. Remarkably, of the 429 locations identified using the Fur-box as described for E. coli (5'-GATAATGATAATCATTATCG) (13), 19 are found within the hbpB ORF (with a tolerance of 6). Second, the newly proposed RirA-box (5'-TGA-N9-TCA) (53) is found at 1,556 locations in the B. quintana genome, and the nearest proximity to fur, rirA, batR, or an hbp is also found within the hbpB ORF. It is tempting to speculate that Fur or RirA represses hbpB, which could explain the low quantities of hbpB transcripts observed throughout these studies, as well as the questionable role of HbpB in B. quintana (7, 41).
In this study, we used the "H-box" to search for other ORFs in the B. quintana genome that could potentially be regulated in the same manner as the hbp genes. We initially discovered the Hbp's by hemin blot analysis of B. quintana cellular lysates (14, 41), yet they shared no homology with other known hemin-binding proteins. Here, by studying the regulation of the hbp genes by using biologically relevant environmental stimuli, we have identified a cis-acting element that is located in the promoter regions of known heme- or iron-related ORFs (cohemolysins, heme O synthase [Fig. 7]), thereby fortifying the hypothesized function of the Hbp's in the absence of sequence-defined structural similarity. Other than the ability to bind heme (14, 17, 41, 73), the overall function of the Hbp family (or the Omp and Rop orthologues in the Rhizobiales) has yet to be clearly defined. "H-box" identification of a family of secreted cohemolysins is quite intriguing and, with further study, could lead to a better understanding of the function of the Hbp family, especially considering that a B. henselae cohemolysin orthologue causes lysis of red blood cells (32). Finally, it is tempting to speculate that heme (synthesis, acquisition, or regulation) had a major evolutionary role in defining the niches occupied by present-day members of the Rhizobiales.
This work was supported by Public Health Service grant R01 AI053111 from the National Institutes of Health.
Published ahead of print on 18 June 2007. ![]()
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://iai.asm.org/. ![]()
|
|
|---|

CT method. Methods 25:402-408.[CrossRef][Medline]
-Proteobacteria. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2:e163. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020163.[CrossRef][Medline]This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»